First time visitor? Learn more.

Caturday: Things cats eat but shouldn’t

by 1389AD ( 77 Comments › )
Filed under Caturday, Open thread at March 3rd, 2012 - 4:00 pm

cat versus human: Monday, January 23, 2012

(h/t: Johanna)

Things cats eat but shouldn't

I tell people not to bring me flowers when they come to my home.

——
Oh, and hi new readers. Just an FYI, click here for CvsH’s
Facebook Page (for updates)
Facebook Group (for LOTS of cat photos, advice, etc…)
Twitter

More here.




Things Cat’s Shouldn’t Eat?

 

Watch Out!

 

You Might Be Next!

12 Hungry Kittehs Devour Their Owner!

The grisly skeletal remains of a 62-year-old man who had been eaten by his 12 hungry cats — possibly while still alive — were discovered recently in Rostov-on-Don.

Officials say it was impossible to determine whether the man — whose name was not released — had died and then was eaten by the famished felines or whether the animals had caused his death by eating him alive, as his body had been mostly consumed.

Police made the horrific discovery after relatives reported that he had not answered his phone or opened his door for several days.

When the cops forced open the door, they found the man’s cats, with blood on their noses and hissing as they prowled around his skeletal remains.

“It is impossible to establish the cause of death,” senior investigator Sergei Udovenko told Express Gazeta.

 

NOM!! NOM!! INDEED!

 

(added by Coldwarrior)

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

77 Responses to “Caturday: Things cats eat but shouldn’t”
( jump to bottom )

  1. momcat
    1 | March 3, 2012 4:20 pm

    I want one!

    Researchers develop ‘SpeechJammer’ gun that can quash human utterances

    Imagine sitting around a conference table with several of your colleagues as you hold an important meeting. Now imagine your boss pulling out what looks like a radar gun for catching speeding motorists and aiming at any of you that speak to long, very nearly instantly causing whoever is speaking to start stuttering then mumbling and then to stop speaking at all. That’s the idea behind the SpeechJammer, a gun that can be fired at people to force them to stop speaking. It’s the brainchild of Koji Tsukada and Kazutaka Kurihara, science and technology researchers in Japan


  2. momcat
    2 | March 3, 2012 4:32 pm

    HUGE!!!!

    Gingrich co-chair resigns and endorses Santorun

    State Sen. Stacey Campfield, co-chairman of Newt Gingrich’s campaign in Tennessee, announced today he is quitting that position to support Rick Santorum in the Republican presidential race.

    The Knoxville Republican made his announcement in a post on his blog. In an interview, Campfield said he believes that conservatives need to unite behind a single candidate and that Santorum is best positioned to defeat “establishment Republican” candidate Mitt Romney


  3. Da_Beerfreak
    3 | March 3, 2012 4:41 pm

    Saintorum will only draw enough support away from Gingrich to guarantee a Mitt-Witt McRomney win. Much to the delight of the Gutless Old Party Leadership. :evil:

    Looks like I’ll be voting third-party again this year. :roll:


  4. 4 | March 3, 2012 4:53 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:

    Let’s see how Newt does on Super Tuesday….


  5. Da_Beerfreak
    5 | March 3, 2012 5:03 pm

    Macker wrote:

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    Let’s see how Newt does on Super Tuesday….

    I’m looking forward to seeing who comes out on top Tuseday. But I’m afraid even Newt doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in Minnesota. This is not a swing state. :evil:
    On the other hand this is the kind of strange State that Ron Paul just might… :shock:

    Obama [pb&j] FUBAR :twisted:


  6. brookly red
    6 | March 3, 2012 5:05 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Saintorum will only draw enough support away from Gingrich to guarantee a Mitt-Witt McRomney win. Much to the delight of the Gutless Old Party Leadership.

    Looks like I’ll be voting third-party again this year.

    *sigh* I will be voting against Obama even if it means holding my nose while I do it. (and it probably will) But I am sorry, a vote for anyone other than the GOP candidate IS a vote for Obama, and as the Godfather said “this I shall not forgive”.


  7. 7 | March 3, 2012 5:06 pm

    Looks like I’ll be voting third-party again this year.

    Oh, voting for Obama, eh?


  8. brookly red
    8 | March 3, 2012 5:07 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    Looks like I’ll be voting third-party again this year.

    Oh, voting for Obama, eh?

    again.


  9. Da_Beerfreak
    9 | March 3, 2012 5:09 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    Looks like I’ll be voting third-party again this year.
    Oh, voting for Obama, eh?

    Sure. Why not??

    Let the Fools have their Prince.


  10. brookly red
    10 | March 3, 2012 5:13 pm

    I used to have this highly pedigreed Persian cat that I needed to lock in a closet before bringing shrimp of any kind into the apartment… she became absolutely berserk about shrimp.


  11. brookly red
    11 | March 3, 2012 5:14 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Sure. Why not??

    sorry to damn much at risk, we could lose the country for good.


  12. Da_Beerfreak
    12 | March 3, 2012 5:16 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    I used to have this highly pedigreed Persian cat that I needed to lock in a closet before bringing shrimp of any kind into the apartment… she became absolutely berserk about shrimp.

    Cats are funny that way. The one I had would touch shrimp but would go nutz over fresh cooked beef liver. Go figure??


  13. taxfreekiller
    13 | March 3, 2012 5:23 pm

    OK, so that I have it correct and understood.

    Eric Holder and the ATF, FBI, DEA, all with hands in the fast and furious operations get a pass on a INS and BP officers being shot and killed with walked guns, together with hundreds of Mexicans and more to come of both.

    5 grunts who burn trash in Afganistain as that is their job, who happen to be on duty when some books get burned with other stuff and it turns out the books were korans,,, these five are going to be court marshaled.

    That about it.

    But for the grace of God go any one of U.S..

    Something bad wrong with our country.

    Bad.


  14. Da_Beerfreak
    14 | March 3, 2012 5:24 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Sure. Why not??
    sorry to damn much at risk, we could lose the country for good.

    There’s a lot more to this great Country then the handful of Fools in DC that think they run things. The States and the People would do a lot better without the deadweight of DC dragging everybody down.

    This Country will be lost without real change and I don’t see the Orcs in DC changing anytime soon…


  15. NoThreat2U
    15 | March 3, 2012 5:24 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:
    No shit. Teh Won is a muzz lovin’ bastard. No doubt about it.


  16. 16 | March 3, 2012 5:26 pm

    @ momcat:

    That is huge! I don’t think Newt is going to be able to go the distance. Tuesday is going to be very interesting…


  17. brookly red
    17 | March 3, 2012 5:36 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Something bad wrong with our country.

    it’s not our country that’s what is bad wrong


  18. yenta-fada
    18 | March 3, 2012 5:41 pm

    Surprised kitty

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Bmhjf0rKe8&feature=email


  19. Da_Beerfreak
    19 | March 3, 2012 5:41 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Something bad wrong with our country.

    Something Someone is very rotten in Mordor on the Potomac.


  20. yenta-fada
    20 | March 3, 2012 5:44 pm

    At a fundraiser, a woman yelled out ‘Don’t go to war with Iran’ Obama jokes about ‘jumping the gun’.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/video/87557364/


  21. Da_Beerfreak
    21 | March 3, 2012 5:49 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    At a fundraiser, a woman yelled out ‘Don’t go to war with Iran’ Obama jokes about ‘jumping the gun’.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/video/87557364/

    Obama is currently engaged in a full scale war against reality. :evil:
    A war his supporters are dumb enough to think they are winning. :twisted:


  22. brookly red
    22 | March 3, 2012 5:51 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    At a fundraiser, a woman yelled out ‘Don’t go to war with Iran’ Obama jokes about ‘jumping the gun’.

    Translation: I would love to burn those people (because they oppose me) but I need to think about the election.


  23. brookly red
    23 | March 3, 2012 5:52 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Obama is currently engaged in a full scale war against reality.
    A war his supporters are dumb enough to think they are winning.

    well actually they are, reality is getting it’s ass kicked.


  24. Da_Beerfreak
    24 | March 3, 2012 5:54 pm

    @ brookly red:
    Only a battle or two… :twisted:


  25. brookly red
    25 | March 3, 2012 5:54 pm

    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?


  26. brookly red
    26 | March 3, 2012 5:55 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    @ brookly red:
    Only a battle or two…

    Oh reality will win eventually, I just don’t want to be collateral damage.


  27. yenta-fada
    27 | March 3, 2012 5:55 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:
    At a fundraiser, a woman yelled out ‘Don’t go to war with Iran’ Obama jokes about ‘jumping the gun’.
    Translation: I would love to burn those people (because they oppose me) but I need to think about the election.

    One of the things that is jaw-dropping to me is the light-hearted, joking manner of the imam in chief at the prospect of people dying. Psychopathic much?


  28. brookly red
    28 | March 3, 2012 5:57 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:
    At a fundraiser, a woman yelled out ‘Don’t go to war with Iran’ Obama jokes about ‘jumping the gun’.
    Translation: I would love to burn those people (because they oppose me) but I need to think about the election.

    people don’t get it… we really are in deep shit.

    One of the things that is jaw-dropping to me is the light-hearted, joking manner of the imam in chief at the prospect of people dying. Psychopathic much?


  29. Da_Beerfreak
    29 | March 3, 2012 5:58 pm

    Someone is going to start a major war in the Middle East, it’s just a question of who and when. :evil:


  30. yenta-fada
    30 | March 3, 2012 5:58 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?

    Hit job. No way this was natural causes. If you mean a natural consequence of opposing the establishment, well that’s a different story. Sherlock Holmes would agree with me. Means, motive, opportunity. Why yes, I do read a lot of detective fiction. Even so….


  31. brookly red
    31 | March 3, 2012 6:00 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Someone is going to start a major war in the Middle East, it’s just a question of who and when.

    the war has been started long ago. there may be a major battle in the ME , but we have been at war for a very long time.


  32. yenta-fada
    32 | March 3, 2012 6:02 pm

    @ brookly red:

    People didn’t get the rise of Hitler either, until it was too late. Blaming the Joooos is looking like history rhyming. Economic crisis, blame the Joooos, war, blame the Joooos, etc.


  33. brookly red
    33 | March 3, 2012 6:02 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Hit job. No way this was natural causes. If you mean a natural consequence of opposing the establishment, well that’s a different story. Sherlock Holmes would agree with me. Means, motive, opportunity. Why yes, I do read a lot of detective fiction. Even so….

    funny… someone just 86ed my avatar.


  34. brookly red
    34 | March 3, 2012 6:03 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Hit job. No way this was natural causes. If you mean a natural consequence of opposing the establishment, well that’s a different story. Sherlock Holmes would agree with me. Means, motive, opportunity. Why yes, I do read a lot of detective fiction. Even so….

    funny… someone just 86ed my avatar.

    ahhh it’s back


  35. yenta-fada
    35 | March 3, 2012 6:05 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Someone is going to start a major war in the Middle East, it’s just a question of who and when.
    the war has been started long ago. there may be a major battle in the ME , but we have been at war for a very long time.

    It certainly feels that way, doesn’t it? The wannabe John Birchers are Ron Paul supporters (from what I follow online) and they are strong isolationists. As if that would stop the bad guys. It just shows you that we are creatures of emotion much more than creatures of reason.


  36. Da_Beerfreak
    36 | March 3, 2012 6:07 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:
    Someone is going to start a major war in the Middle East, it’s just a question of who and when.
    the war has been started long ago. there may be a major battle in the ME , but we have been at war for a very long time.

    Let me put it this way then. Someone is about to make a very big mistake and the shit is going to hit the fan big time. :shock:


  37. brookly red
    37 | March 3, 2012 6:07 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ brookly red:

    People didn’t get the rise of Hitler either, until it was too late. Blaming the Joooos is looking like history rhyming. Economic crisis, blame the Joooos, war, blame the Joooos, etc.

    I don’t go all bible thumping on line. having said that, there is a darkness growing and there is no political solution.


  38. brookly red
    38 | March 3, 2012 6:09 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Let me put it this way then. Someone is about to make a very big mistake and the shit is going to hit the fan big time.

    well let’s hope it happens before O disarms us completely.


  39. 39 | March 3, 2012 6:10 pm

    @ taxfreekiller:

    I wonder what he demographic breakdown of those soldiers are….


  40. brookly red
    40 | March 3, 2012 6:12 pm

    Macker wrote:

    @ taxfreekiller:

    I wonder what he demographic breakdown of those soldiers are….

    I checked the USPS website… up shit’s creek don’t have a zip code.


  41. taxfreekiller
    41 | March 3, 2012 6:28 pm

    Eat or be eaten.


  42. taxfreekiller
    42 | March 3, 2012 6:28 pm

    Fight or die.


  43. taxfreekiller
    43 | March 3, 2012 6:29 pm

    No decision is a decision.


  44. taxfreekiller
    44 | March 3, 2012 6:29 pm

    If they can not look you in the eye, they are not on your side.


  45. 45 | March 3, 2012 6:30 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?

    Natural causes.


  46. taxfreekiller
    46 | March 3, 2012 6:31 pm

    Commies have nothing unless its your stuff.


  47. taxfreekiller
    47 | March 3, 2012 6:32 pm

    5 gunts in Afgaistain will get courts marshalled, by Natural Causes.


  48. yenta-fada
    48 | March 3, 2012 6:47 pm

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    brookly red wrote:
    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?
    Natural causes.

    They were announcing ‘natural causes’ before the autopsy. I am open to both points of view. It is something we will likely never know.


  49. yenta-fada
    49 | March 3, 2012 6:47 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    If they can not look you in the eye, they are not on your side.

    Sociopaths can look you in the eye and lie to your face.


  50. yenta-fada
    50 | March 3, 2012 6:48 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    Commies have nothing unless its your stuff.

    Governments have nothing unless its your taxes.


  51. Da_Beerfreak
    51 | March 3, 2012 6:51 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    taxfreekiller wrote:
    Commies have nothing unless its your stuff.
    Governments have nothing unless its your taxes.

    Long past time to revoke the consent of the governed. :evil:


  52. 52 | March 3, 2012 6:56 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.


  53. 53 | March 3, 2012 6:58 pm

    I was just reading about !!CHU’CHE!! in NorKo, “The Cleanest Race”. The author got his information from reading Nork stuff that they teach their own kids and in propaganda they give to *South* Koreans; not the poo they serve out to us bignoses.

    The North Koreans are even more fucked up than I thought.

    Some highlights:

    – Basically Norks are told over and over that they are all children; the Party is their mother, and they need the Party to protect them. From us.

    – “Juche” is poo. Meaningless. “Not Even Wrong”. No North Korean would be able to explain it to you.

    – “Korean Nationalism” before 1945 meant collaboration with the Japanese. The Japanese had put themselves out as the Koreans’ liberator from the inferior races. Those other races are all unclean, starting with the Chinese. [On the Japanese side, that goes some way toward explaining why Nanking happened in China and not in Korea.] All the Party did in the late 1940s was to erase “Japan” from all those references.

    – Korea barely had any Marx. Stalin and Mao tried to teach it to the Koreans, but then the two gave up.

    – It follows that the Nork state / Party did “Juche” AND “Communism” for overseas consumption. Really the state believes in racial purity and in the citizen as infant.

    – The famine in the 1990s didn’t hurt the Kims and the Party. In a way everything they did prepared the state for the famine. Communism promises free shit for the working man, so when it doesn’t do that – as in East Germany in the 1980s – the people get mad. If the ideology is all about the pure wee Korean children, though, the state only loses legitimacy when it fails to protect the race from Americans.


  54. 54 | March 3, 2012 6:59 pm

    Here’s a great video documentary on the Barbary Wars, and the birth of the US Marine Corps. 197 years ago today the United States declared war on Algeria and won.

    httpv://youtu.be/sB5BNDyGq1c


  55. 55 | March 3, 2012 6:59 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Urban Infidel wrote:
    brookly red wrote:
    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?
    Natural causes.
    They were announcing ‘natural causes’ before the autopsy. I am open to both points of view. It is something we will likely never know.

    They were announcing “Natural Causes” before the autopsy for a reason. Andrew suffered a massive heart attack that almost killed him about 5 months ago, he refused to follow his doctors orders. When the paramedics responded to the call about him collapsing their EKG machine told them Andrew was having another massive heart attack, they tried to save him but were unable to get him stabilized on route to the hospital and he died on route.


  56. Bumr50
    56 | March 3, 2012 7:01 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:

    Bill Whittle, when asked the day afterwards whether or not the death surprised him, immediately responded “No.”

    He already had one major heart attack, and apparently couldn’t let go of the reins.


  57. yenta-fada
    57 | March 3, 2012 7:03 pm

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.

    I hear what you are saying about a conspiracy industry. That’s one of the key things that made Breitbart outstanding. He brought evidence to people, not theories. btw, I have a Michael Scheuer interview where he endorses Ron Paul. Just thought you might be interested. I would have to hunt for it because there’s no organizing priniciple for my bookmarks. lol


  58. 58 | March 3, 2012 7:04 pm

    Bumr50 wrote:

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Bill Whittle, when asked the day afterwards whether or not the death surprised him, immediately responded “No.”
    He already had one major heart attack, and apparently couldn’t let go of the reins.

    Exactly, while the public didn’t know about Andrew’s previous heart attack, all of Andrew’s close friends and family did.


  59. Dolphin
    59 | March 3, 2012 7:04 pm

    @ Urban Infidel:
    Have had two family members and a friend die of aortic dissection this past year. Two were under 50, one was under 40. All were very sudden and death was very quick.

    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/aortic-dissection/DS00605


  60. yenta-fada
    60 | March 3, 2012 7:06 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:
    Urban Infidel wrote:
    brookly red wrote:
    so… Breitbart. Natural causes? yes or no?
    Natural causes.
    They were announcing ‘natural causes’ before the autopsy. I am open to both points of view. It is something we will likely never know.
    They were announcing “Natural Causes” before the autopsy for a reason. Andrew suffered a massive heart attack that almost killed him about 5 months ago, he refused to follow his doctors orders. When the paramedics responded to the call about him collapsing their EKG machine told them Andrew was having another massive heart attack, they tried to save him but were unable to get him stabilized on route to the hospital and he died on route.

    I did not know that. Thanks. We certainly didn’t get much on Breitbart in Canada.


  61. Da_Beerfreak
    61 | March 3, 2012 7:10 pm

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.

    Where there’s no trust in government the conspiracy industry will bloom. There’s no stopping it. :evil:


  62. 62 | March 3, 2012 7:10 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    I did not know that. Thanks. We certainly didn’t get much on Breitbart in Canada.

    I’m in California, Andrew lived about 225 miles away form me, the details got out here pretty fast.


  63. 63 | March 3, 2012 7:10 pm

    @ yenta-fada:
    Oh, I am familiar with Scheuer’s support of Ron Paul. There’s a lot of things I agree with Scheuer about and then there’s the issues I don’t, like his views on Israel and Ron Paul.


  64. 64 | March 3, 2012 7:12 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    Urban Infidel wrote:
    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.

    Where there’s no trust in government the conspiracy industry will bloom. There’s no stopping it.

    America’s conspiracy industry is not just blooming it’s a damned hostile invasive species taking over the country.


  65. 65 | March 3, 2012 7:13 pm

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    Yep. And sometimes a pipe is just a pipe.


  66. 66 | March 3, 2012 7:16 pm

    Breitbart was still in the middle of a massive heart attack when the paramedics arrived. He could not be stabilized enroute.

    His death was not called until he was in the ER. Thus (as I understand it) in CA he died under Medical Care and a preliminary call of Natural Causes should be made.

    Due to this being a high profile death an autopsy will still be performed but will not have the urgency or priority on Lab time as a open case would receive.

    Anybody in CA who can confirm, correct or expand?


  67. Da_Beerfreak
    67 | March 3, 2012 7:16 pm

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ Da_Beerfreak:
    Yep. And sometimes a pipe is just a pipe.

    Or a handle is just a handle.

    A Guy from Hibbing said that a long time ago.


  68. coldwarrior
    68 | March 3, 2012 7:17 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Andrew suffered a massive heart attack that almost killed him about 5 months ago, he refused to follow his doctors orders. When the paramedics responded to the call about him collapsing their EKG machine told them Andrew was having another massive heart attack, they tried to save him but were unable to get him stabilized on route to the hospital and he died on route.

    the cardiac docs and nurses are pretty bright peeps…he shoulda listened.

    oh well

    pulled pork and fresh buns are done —->

    (call yer cardiac doc first!)

    :lol:


  69. brookly red
    69 | March 3, 2012 7:40 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    America’s conspiracy industry is not just blooming it’s a damned hostile invasive species taking over the country.

    taking over the country ehh? sounds like a conspiracy to me. ;)


  70. brookly red
    70 | March 3, 2012 7:46 pm

    AZOlddog wrote:

    Breitbart was still in the middle of a massive heart attack when the paramedics arrived. He could not be stabilized enroute.

    His death was not called until he was in the ER. Thus (as I understand it) in CA he died under Medical Care and a preliminary call of Natural Causes should be made.

    Due to this being a high profile death an autopsy will still be performed but will not have the urgency or priority on Lab time as a open case would receive.

    Anybody in CA who can confirm, correct or expand?

    well assuming a heart attack was the cause of death is all good. there are ways/drugs to induce one… and for that matter a previous cardiac incident could also be “un natural” although possibly self inflicted.


  71. Lily
    71 | March 3, 2012 7:46 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:

    Andrew suffered a massive heart attack that almost killed him about 5 months ago, he refused to follow his doctors orders. When the paramedics responded to the call about him collapsing their EKG machine told them Andrew was having another massive heart attack, they tried to save him but were unable to get him stabilized on route to the hospital and he died on route.

    the cardiac docs and nurses are pretty bright peeps…he shoulda listened.

    oh well

    pulled pork and fresh buns are done —->

    (call yer cardiac doc first!)

    Sounds like the type of heart attack that is called a “Widow Maker”.
    A type personalities and men in their 40’s. He got a warning and didn’t heed it.


  72. 72 | March 3, 2012 7:57 pm

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.

    Agreed!


  73. brookly red
    73 | March 3, 2012 8:06 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Urban Infidel wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    I’d hate for a whole conspiracy industry to start blooming around this sad event. The medical examiner will provide their findings. Personally, I think he just may have worked too hard.

    Agreed!

    what is this? an OWS channeling? “work kills?” really?


  74. 74 | March 3, 2012 8:09 pm

    @ brookly red:

    No he had a weak heart and over did it.


  75. 75 | March 3, 2012 8:09 pm

    New thread.


  76. Canoe Convoy
    76 | March 4, 2012 12:00 pm

    @ momcat:
    I can just see how this would be misused. I would want one, if only to use it on folks who are using theirs to silence others. Given the quality of political discourse in this nation, I could see this device being used to silence a lot of folks. Someone who you don’t like is talking ? Use this device. No need to bother with being polite, or working at winning the argument — just use this device.


  77. Canoe Convoy
    77 | March 4, 2012 12:05 pm

    @ momcat:
    Think of how you would feel or react if someone used this device against you, relentlessly, all while espousing an idea or point of view you find stupid, or wrong, or angering. Think of that situation before endorsing this device — how would you like it used against you (especially in a hurtful, mean-spirited fashion) ?


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David