First time visitor? Learn more.

Santorum goes to war against Porn

by Rodan ( 37 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Theocratic Progressives at March 15th, 2012 - 8:02 pm

With America’s middle calls getting left behind, Oil prices high and our debt out of control, Rick Santorum has other concerns. He has stated that if he’s elected, he will go after Porn. That’s right, he wants to go after porn!

Internet pornography could conceivably become a thing of the past if Rick Santorum is elected president.

The unapologetic social conservative, currently in second place behind Mitt Romney for the GOP nomination, has promised to crack down on the distribution of pornography if elected.

Santorum says in a statement posted to his website, “The Obama Administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography and has refused to enforce obscenity laws.”

If elected, he promises to “vigorously” enforce laws that “prohibit distribution of hardcore (obscene) pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV, in retail shops and through the mail or by common carrier.”

[....]

Santorum’s administration could take American-based porn distributors to court for violating obscenity laws, said Volokh, and have them shuttered. But that would leave foreign-based sites untouched.

To black out foreign sites, Santorum would likely need legislative action requiring Internet service providers to use “a mandatory filter set up by the government or by the service providers,” said Volokh.

But the government could also prosecute individual citizens who view porn, and already has the legal authority to do it.

Santorum is a nanny state Republican. He wants to dictate what people do in their personal lives. If people don’t like porn, well don’t buy it or watch it.Whatever happened to the party of personal responsibility? Mike Bloomberg would be a perfect running mate for Rick Santorum. Both want a nanny state utopia

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

37 Responses to “Santorum goes to war against Porn”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | March 15, 2012 8:04 pm

    What a yo-yo!


  2. Speranza
    2 | March 15, 2012 8:05 pm

    “So you approve of Internet porn” -- is the response of the yahoos.


  3. coldwarrior
    3 | March 15, 2012 8:09 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Pennsylvania RCP Average 2/2 – 3/12 – santorum-38.5 romney-23.0 gingrich-10.8 paul-9.3
    Santorum +15.5


  4. coldwarrior
    4 | March 15, 2012 8:10 pm

    “If elected, he promises to “vigorously” enforce laws”

    enforce laws! oh my god!!!!

    enforce laws!

    how dare he!


  5. coldwarrior
    5 | March 15, 2012 8:12 pm

    when was the last big heroin bust, rodan?


  6. 6 | March 15, 2012 8:35 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    What does that have to do with this Religious-Progressive wanting to ban porn? What business is it of him what people do with their personal life.

    What next, a Saudi style morality police?


  7. Speranza
    7 | March 15, 2012 8:35 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    “If elected, he promises to “vigorously” enforce laws”
    enforce laws! oh my god!!!!
    enforce laws!
    how dare he!

    I am scared to consider what laws he considers to be laws. Does he want to go back to Prohibition, Sunday Blue Laws, have men and women sleep in separate beds on TV when they play husband and wife? There is a reason why the doofus lost by 18%. He comes across emotionally unbalanced.


  8. 8 | March 15, 2012 8:37 pm

    @ Speranza:

    He probably will want to ban divorce and mini-skirts. Santorum is the Republican version of Bloomberg.


  9. 9 | March 15, 2012 8:37 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    I won’t have a cell until Saturday. I’ll call from my parents house. SO you see an odd area code, its me.


  10. Speranza
    10 | March 15, 2012 8:38 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    He probably will want to ban divorce and mini-skirts. Santorum is the Republican version of Bloomberg.

    Both are nannny’s -- one wants to tell you what to eat, the other what to believe. I have zero use for either one of them.


  11. 11 | March 15, 2012 8:42 pm

    America has a lot of laws on the books, given that it’s not a free country. Not all of these laws are wise, given that this unfree country is run by fools.

    In the case of streaming media, banning a product in country X will just push it to country Y. So, yes, President Santorum would have to seal off the international Internet in order to protect our children from the “scourge” of pr0nz.

    Whether looking at adult noodz on your computer is a societal evil, or not, is very much open to debate. Whether it’s an evil worse than, I dunno, complete economic meltdown and an Iranian nuclear stranglehold over the Hormuz -- I’ll just say that arguing that point is not going to be easy.

    What Santorum should say, is along the lines of “I will abolish those laws that can’t be enforced internationally, and I will work with our allies to secure the Internet from criminals. Child pornography and sexual slavery will not be tolerated here or anywhere.”


  12. coldwarrior
    12 | March 15, 2012 8:44 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    I am scared to consider what laws he considers to be laws. Does he want to go back to Prohibition, Sunday Blue Laws, have men and women sleep in separate beds on TV when they play husband and wife? There is a reason why the doofus lost by 18%. He comes across emotionally unbalanced.

    ok…if that is where you are there is no way to speak rationally with you or have a decent discussion about this subject. fine by me, i dont support santorum one way or the other.


  13. coldwarrior
    13 | March 15, 2012 8:46 pm

    @ Zimriel:

    he does get it on islam, for real gets it.

    we cant have that


  14. 14 | March 15, 2012 8:53 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    he does get it on islam, for real gets it.

    Then that’s what he should concentrate on.


  15. coldwarrior
    15 | March 15, 2012 8:58 pm

    Zimriel wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    he does get it on islam, for real gets it.
    Then that’s what he should concentrate on.

    why? we arent at war with them or anything? they desire democracy just like us. hell…islam is an honorable religion, filled with peace loving folk just like yourself! give palestine a state and lets hand the egyptian govt over to the muslim brotherhood!

    :lol:


  16. 16 | March 15, 2012 9:17 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Imam: All those in favor of annihilating the JOOOOOOS say ‘Aye!’
    Muslims: AAAAAYYYYYEEEEE!
    See…that’s Muslim Democracy in action. 8)


  17. waldensianspirit
    17 | March 15, 2012 9:18 pm

    Carney To Catholic Bishops: Birth Control Decision Is Final, Now Piss Off…

    /Oh and vote Romney for tv shows with nonsegregated beds!


  18. darkwords
    18 | March 15, 2012 9:24 pm

    To me Santorum represents a division in the country that won’t have many cross over votes. Obama will set him up as a clown punching bag and box him all over the country.


  19. Speranza
    19 | March 15, 2012 9:36 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    ok…if that is where you are there is no way to speak rationally with you or have a decent discussion about this subject. fine by me, i dont support santorum one way or the other.

    Come off it. I think about as much of Santorum as you do of Romney. There is a reason why he got his ass handed to him in 2006.


  20. waldensianspirit
    20 | March 15, 2012 9:39 pm

    Something tells me Obama would want to stay far away from this topic. Very thin ice for him.


  21. Bumr50
    21 | March 15, 2012 9:45 pm

    I don’t like Santorum.

    But I’ll gladly vote for him over Mittens.

    His economic plan is better, and he hates the Muzz.

    And simply to stick a finger in the eye of the GOP establishment.


  22. coldwarrior
    22 | March 15, 2012 9:48 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    coldwarrior wrote:
    ok…if that is where you are there is no way to speak rationally with you or have a decent discussion about this subject. fine by me, i dont support santorum one way or the other.
    Come off it. I think about as much of Santorum as you do of Romney. There is a reason why he got his ass handed to him in 2006.

    i’ll still vote for romney against 0 any day.

    this will be the last time for the gop for me to do that though.


  23. coldwarrior
    23 | March 15, 2012 9:49 pm

    Bumr50 wrote:

    His economic plan is better, and he hates the Muzz.

    that isnt important.

    we cant have a prez that actually wants to fight the muzz!


  24. The Osprey
    24 | March 16, 2012 12:01 am

    Well, looks like Santorum just lost the Iceweasel vote.
    :lol:


  25. The Osprey
    25 | March 16, 2012 12:08 am

    If Santorum said he would put soldiers in Humvees with a .50 cal “Ma Deuce” on the roof
    at corner of every major intersection, with orders to open fire on every car that drives by
    blaring cRap “music” so loud the body panels shake I’d send the guy 1000 bucks!

    I got your culture war right here muhfuggahs ! :twisted:


  26. The Osprey
    26 | March 16, 2012 12:15 am

    Okay, in the spirit of Bill Murray’s “Star Wars Lounge Singer”….

    Poooooooornnnnnn Waaaaaaarrrrssss! Nothing but Porn Wars!


  27. Bob in Breckenridge
    27 | March 16, 2012 1:44 am

    With all the problems the POS occupying the White House and the other dumocrats have caused that need to be fixed, I’d put porn wayyyyyyyy down at the bottom of my “to do” list. Priorities, knucklehead…


  28. lobo91
    28 | March 16, 2012 4:49 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    “If elected, he promises to “vigorously” enforce laws”

    enforce laws! oh my god!!!!

    enforce laws!

    how dare he!

    Of course, that points out the real danger with Obama: It’s all a matter of what laws the current administration chooses to enforce (or not).

    Voter intimidation is already illegal. So is voter fraud. And illegal immigration. And plotting to commit mass murder for political aims (whether couched in religious terms or not).

    But Obama chooses not to enforce those laws.


  29. lobo91
    29 | March 16, 2012 4:51 am

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    With all the problems the POS occupying the White House and the other dumocrats have caused that need to be fixed, I’d put porn wayyyyyyyy down at the bottom of my “to do” list. Priorities, knucklehead…

    It may be down the list, but it’s all related, whether people want to admit it or not.


  30. lobo91
    30 | March 16, 2012 5:05 am

    Here’s the end result of the “social libertarian” mindset:

    “Pro-Choice” Activist: “I Love Abortion,” “Don’t Want It Rare”

    A pro-abortion activist writing at one of the leading pro-abortion websites is admitting what many in the pro-life movement has always known but what leading defenders of abortion refuse to admit. Until now.

    Jessica DelBalzo, an activist writer from Flemington, New Jersey who has written for numerous progressive websites, puts her extreme pro-abortion views on display at RH Reality Check, where she candidly admits in a headline, “I Love Abortion: Implying Otherwise Accomplishes Nothing for Women’s Rights.”

    “I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion,” DelBalzo declares.

    The pro-abortion activist categorically opposes even the “safe, legal and rare” mantra that pro-abortion politicians like Bill Clinton have used to appear to be more moderate or mainstream on abortion and that even former NARAL president Kate Michelman used to make her organization’s position appear less polemic.

    As Delbalzo writes, “And I bristle every time a fellow activist uses a trendy catch-phrase or rallying cry meant to placate pro-lifers. The first of these, “Make abortion safe, legal, and rare!” has been used for decades as a call for abortion rights.”

    “Safe and legal are concepts I fully support, but rare is something I cannot abide.”


  31. 31 | March 16, 2012 6:18 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    If Santorum said he would put soldiers in Humvees with a .50 cal “Ma Deuce” on the roof
    at corner of every major intersection, with orders to open fire on every car that drives by
    blaring cRap “music” so loud the body panels shake I’d send the guy 1000 bucks!

    I got your culture war right here muhfuggahs !

    Take all the lyrics out of any standard Hip-Hop tune and simply substitute two rhyming words (follow the beat of course):
    “Motherfucker…Cocksucker…
    Motherfucker…Cocksucker…”

    Etc. and so on and so forth…ad nauseum…See? NO change in the ‘Quality’ at all!


  32. 32 | March 16, 2012 6:19 am

    @ The Osprey:

    Um…that could be aka ‘Star Whores’!


  33. 33 | March 16, 2012 7:38 am

    @ lobo91:

    She must love to fuck and fuck and fuck and fuck and fuck and fuck and fuck and fuck…and fuck until it hurts and then fuck some more!


  34. Speranza
    34 | March 16, 2012 10:29 am

    @ lobo91:
    Nice way of tainting every one with what some radical loon says.


  35. Speranza
    35 | March 16, 2012 10:30 am

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    With all the problems the POS occupying the White House and the other dumocrats have caused that need to be fixed, I’d put porn wayyyyyyyy down at the bottom of my “to do” list. Priorities, knucklehead…

    Spot on Brother Bob! On the top 100 things afflicting America, that is like number 273.


  36. 36 | March 16, 2012 10:36 am

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    With all the problems the POS occupying the White House and the other dumocrats have caused that need to be fixed, I’d put porn wayyyyyyyy down at the bottom of my “to do” list. Priorities, knucklehead…

    You get it. Now you will join me and Speranza as being considered Evil Libertarian leaning RINOs! we have insulted our savior Santorum and have committed blasphemy and we must be punished! Welcome to the club of evil!


  37. 37 | March 16, 2012 10:38 am

    @ lobo91:

    That’s a social Progressive, not a Social Libertarian.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David