First time visitor? Learn more.

The first post-racial President? It’s black and white: Obama to blame for increased racial violence

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, government, Hate Speech, History, Marxism, Media, Politics, Progressives at April 12th, 2012 - 8:00 am

Remember when we were all told that the Marxist occupying the White House would be the first post-racial President and would bring all Americans, regardless of their skin color, together?

GMAFB! We all knew that was a load of crap, just like everything else the mainstream media official propaganda department of the Obama regime and the dumocrat party tried to tell us would happen if this Marxist was elected. What we have is the most racist administration regime in over 100 years.

I saw this coming when the Regime’s Department Of Justice Injustice refused to prosecute the new black panthers for voter intimidation in Philadelphia on election day, 2008, and when the racist Attorney General, the disgraceful Eric Holder, said he didn’t want to prosecute “our people”, even if they committed a crime.

This regime and Obama himself are more like that racist anti-Semitic dirtbag Calypso Louie Farrakhan than Martin Luther King Jr.

All the proof we need is the fact that for over 20 years, Obama sat there in the pews of that POS Jeremiah Wright’s church and listened to Wright’s racist, hate-filled, anti-American, and anti-Semitic sermons every Sunday. And if’s that’s not bad enough, he also allowed the preacher racist hatemonger to marry him and Moochelle, and to baptize his daughters.

OBAMA TO BLAME FOR INCREASED RACIAL VIOLENCE
Exclusive: Roger Hedgecock notes that president is ‘encouraging payback mentality’

Too many white Americans voted for Barack Obama for president in 2008 because they wanted to prove they weren’t racists. They believed Obama’s promise that his election represented a triumph over racism. Those white Obama voters have been betrayed.

Then and now, opponents of Barack Obama are routinely labeled racist. Hillary supporters found that out in 2008. Nothing’s changed. The president, who promised a post-racial presidency, has played the race card ever since.

From “the Cambridge police acted stupidly” to “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama has deliberately fanned the flames of racial resentment among black Americans.

The racial divisions in American society are worse now than when Obama took office.

When the black woman coming out of an Obama Miami campaign rally in 2008 proclaimed, “He’s gonna take care of my mortgage; he’s gonna buy my gas,” the stage was set for sky-high expectations and crushing disappointment for black Americans.

Today, blacks suffer the highest unemployment, most crime and highest dependency on government assistance of any group of Americans.

Obama maintains black-voter support by signaling that white racism is holding him back, preventing him from accomplishing everything he promised. It’s the oldest excuse for black failure. And it is the gateway to the “payback time” mentality of too many young black males – a mentality that is claiming lives all across the U.S. today.

In a horrible crime reported only in the Tulsa World, the U.K. press and some blogs on March 14, a 20-year-old black man named Tryone Woodfork led an invasion of the North Tulsa, Okla., home of Bob and Nancy Strait, ages 90 and 85.

He and his friends beat the old white couple and shot Bob in the face with a BB gun. Tyrone beat and raped Nancy Strait until she died. Bob is still in the hospital, suffering from a broken jaw, severe bleeding and broken ribs.

Tyrone and friends got away with $200, an old Plymouth Neon and a TV. Tyrone was arrested the next day.

Bob was awarded the bronze star as a World War II paratrooper in the 101st Airborne Division. He and Nancy had been married more than 65 years. They raised six kids and were blessed with 18 grandchildren and 50 great and great, great grandchildren.

When told Nancy was dead, he murmured, “I loved her. I loved that old woman.”

If Bob had defended his home by shooting Tyrone, the national media would be all over this story; Al Sharpton would be leading protests in Tulsa. Apparently, when whites are the victims of black crime, it isn’t news.

Anger over this crime has boiled over in Tulsa. Someone described as white driving a pickup truck is randomly shooting blacks walking in the streets. These shootings have been reported all over the national media.

In another horrible example, two black teenagers followed a younger white teenager home from school. They caught him the porch of his house, doused him with gasoline and lit him on fire as one of the black teenagers said, “This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy.”

No national media (except Fox News) reported the story.

The “payback time” mentality was expressed by Attorney General Eric Holder when he refused to prosecute Voting Rights Act violations by the New Black Panther Party, whose members were intimidating white voters outside Philadelphia polling places in 2008. According to Department of Justice lawyers, Holder believes that only whites can violate the Voting Rights Act.

In schools, in colleges, in courtrooms and in too many workplaces, white Americans are feeling the “payback time” attitude of too many black Americans.

Obama has tolerated and even encouraged black triumphalism, played to the black grievance culture and encouraged the “payback time” mentality.

American voters pinned their hopes for racial healing on Barack Obama. They got Louie Farrakhan instead.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

113 Responses to “The first post-racial President? It’s black and white: Obama to blame for increased racial violence”
( jump to bottom )

  1. MikeA
    1 | April 12, 2012 8:09 am

    Sorry to go OT so soon…

    And the Religion of Peace is at it again. But I am sure its not based on anything to do with islam. The state dept told me so.


  2. coldwarrior
    2 | April 12, 2012 8:43 am

    i want to thank the obama administration for beating the dread of being labeled a racists right out of me.

    now i dont care anymore! i am emancipated from that foolish line of thought!


  3. mawskrat
    3 | April 12, 2012 8:48 am

    @ coldwarrior:

    when my kids were young they asked me if I was
    a racist. I told them I was a realist and in time
    they would see how the world works. after they got
    out of high school it did not take the long to figure
    things out when they got into the real world


  4. mawskrat
    4 | April 12, 2012 8:50 am

    @ mawskrat:

    boy did I butcher that>LOL…english
    my second language


  5. 5 | April 12, 2012 8:55 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i want to thank the obama administration for beating the dread of being labeled a racists right out of me.

    now i dont care anymore! i am emancipated from that foolish line of thought!

    It’s really quite liberating isn’t it? Carrying around all of that white guilt and apologizing for my race was difficult and time consuming. I know what I am and if someone gets the wrong impression, it’s their problem, not mine


  6. Prebanned
    6 | April 12, 2012 9:01 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    @ mawskrat:
    The Democrats divide by race, class, ethnicity, they will think of something.
    In my mind the only division is US and Them.


  7. 7 | April 12, 2012 9:04 am

    @ Prebanned:

    Republicans aint much better either. But Obama is evil and his removal must be priority.


  8. Prebanned
    8 | April 12, 2012 9:05 am

    @ MikeA:
    Amazing how sane and happy Iranian Christians look compared to the rest of them.


  9. 9 | April 12, 2012 9:05 am

    @ MikeA:

    McCain applauds!


  10. Prebanned
    10 | April 12, 2012 9:06 am

    @ Rodan:
    It is the power that corrupts, the government is better with less power.


  11. 11 | April 12, 2012 9:09 am

    Along that line, some VDH goodness. Go thou and read thereof. I don’t have time, or I’d make an article about it.


  12. citizen_q
    12 | April 12, 2012 9:11 am

    @ coldwarrior:
    @ MacDuff:
    I feel the same way. In fact I have posted similar previously.


  13. 13 | April 12, 2012 9:12 am

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    @ mawskrat:
    The Democrats divide by race, class, ethnicity, they will think of something.
    In my mind the only division is US and Them.

    This country has a higher level of race, class and ethnic harmony than is found anywhere in the world. They’re not attacking at our weakest point, they’re attacking at out strongest point. Methinks they’re miscalculating. There’s a lot of middle-class and affluent blacks that find the Sharptons and Jacksons of this world demeaning and insulting. That Obama and Holder still seem to view life through the prism of race is an example of their shortcomings, not those of our country.


  14. citizen_q
    14 | April 12, 2012 9:17 am

    American voters pinned their hopes for racial healing on Barack Obama. They got Louie Farrakhan instead.

    I saw obama as a racist and bigot from a long way off in the run up to the election as have many who have paid attention. There was too much smoke for there not to have been a fire. From his decades long association with rev. wright and black liberation theology and farrakhan, khalid rhashidi, to acorn, and his dismissive and racist characterization of the grandmother who raised him as a typical white women.


  15. Prebanned
    15 | April 12, 2012 9:18 am

    @ MacDuff:
    Probably because they are racist themselves.
    They think everybody else is.


  16. MikeA
    16 | April 12, 2012 9:26 am

    Prebanned wrote:

    @ MikeA:
    Amazing how sane and happy Iranian Christians look compared to the rest of them.

    Thats cause you have to have the “real” faith to be a Christian there. You can’t be a wanna be or a twice a year Christian in a muzzie country. You are in whole hog.


  17. huckfunn
    17 | April 12, 2012 9:26 am

    Mike Tyson brings his thoughtful and reasoned views to the debate. “Forget about him being arrested--the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”


  18. 18 | April 12, 2012 9:27 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Most people aren’t into the race stuff in real life. It’s an artificially created nonsense to cause division.


  19. 19 | April 12, 2012 9:28 am

    @ huckfunn:

    That sounds like a Mike Tyson thread for me!

    :lol:


  20. 20 | April 12, 2012 9:28 am

    @ huckfunn:

    They think they want a race war. That is because they suck at math. I can look at the numbers and tell them how a race war ends, and they aren’t going to like it one bit.


  21. citizen_q
    21 | April 12, 2012 9:30 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Mike Tyson brings his thoughtful and reasoned views to the debate. “Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

    IF Zimmerman can get a fair trial, and what I have read of the case is true, a lot of the lynching thugs are going to be a bit more disappointed when Zimmerman walks.


  22. huckfunn
    22 | April 12, 2012 9:30 am

    @ Rodan:
    @ Iron Fist:
    I suggest that all avatars arm themselves.


  23. Prebanned
    23 | April 12, 2012 9:30 am

    MikeA wrote:

    Prebanned wrote:
    @ MikeA:
    Amazing how sane and happy Iranian Christians look compared to the rest of them.
    Thats cause you have to have the “real” faith to be a Christian there. You can’t be a wanna be or a twice a year Christian in a muzzie country. You are in whole hog.

    Life here on earth is very short compared to eternity, choose wisely.


  24. 24 | April 12, 2012 9:31 am

    We should have a “National STFU About Race Week”. For an entire week, any mention of race in the media, TV shows and personal conversation would be socially unacceptable.

    I can see bumper stickers and t-shirts adorned with “STFU About Race!”. It’s the ultimate grass-roots movement.


  25. Prebanned
    25 | April 12, 2012 9:32 am

    @ citizen_q:
    I bet this blows up worse than Rodney King.
    Bad things coming.


  26. Tanker
    26 | April 12, 2012 9:35 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Mike Tyson brings his thoughtful and reasoned views to the debate. “Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

    I really wish his opinion was an exception to the attitudes out there in the black community. After some conversations with (used to be) black friends, it has become the norm. Most blacks I’ve talked to pretty much say, it doesn’t matter what the courts do…he is a dead man!

    Of course they add the caveat, “it’s not fair to him, but it’s the way it is!”

    Sickens me to think this is what’s become of the nation I love!


  27. huckfunn
    27 | April 12, 2012 9:37 am

    Obama, Holder and the Congressional Black Caucus (I almost forgot the MFM; can’t leave them out of this) have set U.S. race relations back at least 30 years. That will have a negative impact on our society at large but a greater negative impact on black America. White Americans being fearful of black Americans does not bode well for the blacks.


  28. 28 | April 12, 2012 9:38 am

    @ citizen_q:

    Yeah, I read earlier today that based on the facts the judge may throw it out before it goes to trial. Zimmerman has a pretty solid self-defense case. And they are going for a murder charge. That has a pretty high bar to cross to prove. According to the article, well:

    The prosecutors must prove Zimmerman’s shooting of Martin was rooted in hatred or ill will and counter his claims that he shot Martin to protect himself while patrolling his gated community in the Orlando suburb of Sanford. Zimmerman’s lawyers would only have to prove by a preponderance of evidence — a relatively low legal standard — that he acted in self-defense at a pretrial hearing to prevent the case from going to trial.

    If he has competant attourneys, it sounds like his case is pretty strong. The judge may still want to hear what a jury thinks. It’ll depend on the judge. If you get a law-and-order type, the case may be thrown out. If you get a “social justice” type, well, Zimmerman is screwed.


  29. coldwarrior
    29 | April 12, 2012 9:38 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Mike Tyson brings his thoughtful and reasoned views to the debate. “Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

    i see mr tyson has not learned the micheal jordan rule


  30. citizen_q
    30 | April 12, 2012 9:41 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    Most people aren’t into the race stuff in real life. It’s an artificially created nonsense to cause division.

    and for personal and political gain.

    Race hustler is too nice a name, they are pimps, race and class pimps.


  31. mawskrat
    31 | April 12, 2012 9:42 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    Most people aren’t into the race stuff in real life. It’s an artificially created nonsense to cause division.

    stan loves this stuff…nothing artificial about it


  32. citizen_q
    32 | April 12, 2012 9:43 am

    @ Prebanned:
    That is a strong possibility, and I am afraid just what obama, holder et al want. To what use?


  33. huckfunn
    33 | April 12, 2012 9:44 am

    coldwarrior wrote:

    huckfunn wrote:

    Mike Tyson brings his thoughtful and reasoned views to the debate. “Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

    i see mr tyson has not learned the micheal jordan rule

    I remember when you did that Mike Tyson thread awhile back… and a very nice thread it was. I didn’t comment but I remember thinking that Mike will find a way to remind us that he is still Mike. :mrgreen:


  34. citizen_q
    34 | April 12, 2012 9:45 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    This article from American Thinker this morning provides a good summary.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/medildos_the_media_and_the_zimmerman-martin_case.html


  35. 35 | April 12, 2012 9:47 am

    Obama Boom™ continues:

    More people sought unemployment benefits last week, pushing the number of applicants to the highest level in two months.

    The Labor Department said Thursday that weekly unemployment benefit applications jumped 13,000 to a seasonally adjusted 380,000. The previous week’s figures were also revised higher. The four-week average, a less volatile measure, rose to 368,500.

    So naturally Obama wants to focus on race. God, this election should be a slam dunk, but Romney is such a weak candidate…


  36. coldwarrior
    36 | April 12, 2012 9:47 am

    FORE!!!

    See you all later at the clubhouse for drinks and lunch!

    Regards,
    Coldwarrior
    President, BGGCC
    Awards Committee Chair
    Captain, Golf Team


  37. Prebanned
    37 | April 12, 2012 9:52 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ Prebanned:
    That is a strong possibility, and I am afraid just what obama, holder et al want. To what use?

    I guess they are out of a job if things get too post racial.
    Democrats need racial tensions to operate.


  38. 38 | April 12, 2012 9:57 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    The Obama Boom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  39. 39 | April 12, 2012 10:01 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Romney is such a weak candidate…

    He is the most Leftwing Republican since Teddy Roosevelt. This is a Center-Left Republican vs. a Far Left Democrat. Sad choice. :-(


  40. huckfunn
    40 | April 12, 2012 10:03 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    This article from American Thinker this morning provides a good summary.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/medildos_the_media_and_the_zimmerman-martin_case.html

    That is a great read and a perfect description of the medildos who ARE the MFM.


  41. RIX
    41 | April 12, 2012 10:08 am

    Kelli O’Laghlin of Indaian Had Park,lL would have celebrated
    her 15th birthday two weeks ago.
    She was unable because she was murdered five months
    ago.
    She came home from school & suprised a robber in her room.
    He stabbed the teenager repeatedly until dead & left with
    jewelry & her cell phone.
    He used the phone to call & torment kelis mother.
    The perp is Black, the victim White.
    No national outcry.


  42. 42 | April 12, 2012 10:11 am

    RIX wrote:

    Kelli O’Laghlin of Indaian Had Park,lL would have celebrated
    her 15th birthday two weeks ago.
    She was unable because she was murdered five months
    ago.
    She came home from school & suprised a robber in her room.
    He stabbed the teenager repeatedly until dead & left with
    jewelry & her cell phone.
    He used the phone to call & torment kelis mother.
    The perp is Black, the victim White.
    No national outcry.

    “Dog bites man”. Nothing to see here, move along.


  43. 43 | April 12, 2012 10:11 am

    @ RIX:

    Hell, given the track record of Sharpton and the like, they will whine and protest when the perp is given the death penalty (if the perp is given the death penalty). Look at how they went nuts for Tookie Williams.


  44. RIX
    44 | April 12, 2012 10:13 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Dog bites man”. Nothing to see here, move along.

    Sad , but true.


  45. 45 | April 12, 2012 10:13 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Almost half of the murders in the United States are committed by black men, mostly age 15-29. If Trayvon had killed Zimmerman (perhaps with his own gun), there would have been nothing said. It would have been a non-story.


  46. RIX
    46 | April 12, 2012 10:14 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Hell, given the track record of Sharpton and the like, they will whine and protest when the perp is given the death penalty (if the perp is given the death penalty). Look at how they went nuts for Tookie Williams.

    “Fair is foul & foul is fair.”
    We are in some serious shit.


  47. mawskrat
    47 | April 12, 2012 10:19 am

    time to work the gardens
    Ya’ll be good now yah hear


  48. 48 | April 12, 2012 10:20 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    Almost half of the murders in the United States are committed by black men, mostly age 15-29. If Trayvon had killed Zimmerman (perhaps with his own gun), there would have been nothing said. It would have been a non-story.

    I wonder how many nameless, young black men and children have died at the hands of other black men since Treyvon breathed his last?


  49. citizen_q
    49 | April 12, 2012 10:23 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    3 inches of space buried in the local paper would be my guess would be the extent.

    As others have not only dog bites man, but it rides against the preferred narrative.


  50. 50 | April 12, 2012 10:23 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Hell, given the track record of Sharpton and the like, they will whine and protest when the perp is given the death penalty (if the perp is given the death penalty). Look at how they went nuts for Tookie Williams.

    The African-American community repeatedly chooses to celebrate and rally around murders, rapists, thieves, robbers, thugs, pimps, dope dealers and gangsters. From Tookie Williams to OJ Simpson to Lovelle Mixon to Mumia Abu-Jamal. Each proclaimed throughout the Black community as “Hero’s”. The African-American community has some very serious problems.


  51. 51 | April 12, 2012 10:25 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Hell, given the track record of Sharpton

    Oh, and given the track record of Al NotsoSharpton, he should have been strapped to the gurney right next to Tookie Williams.


  52. 52 | April 12, 2012 10:25 am

    @ MacDuff:

    It is in double-digits in Chicago alone. God knows what it is nation wide. That is a big part of the stench of hypocracy that we are seeing from the Left here. They don’t see this as an unfortunate thing. They see it as a vehicle to promote their agenda. They are like vampires, feeding on death fo rpolitical gain. I hope that the majority of Americans are as sickened and angry about it as I am. If they are, we’ll never hear about it in the MFM, but Obama will have made a bad mistake wading in and politicizing this.


  53. 53 | April 12, 2012 10:31 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    If they are, we’ll never hear about it in the MFM, but Obama will have made a bad mistake wading in and politicizing this.

    I truly fear that their is only one cure for the Fifth Column Treasonous Media, and it involves Stout Hemp Rope and Streetlamps.


  54. 54 | April 12, 2012 10:33 am

    I was once beaten for no reason, other than my race. In 1972, there was fairly widespread racial violence aboard several US Navy ships serving off the coast of VietNam, a little known fact. I was one of the sailors beaten aboard the USS Hassayampa, AO145:

    Four days later, a group of about 12 black sailors aboard the USS Hassayampa, a fleet oiler docked at Subic Bay, told ship’s officers that they would not sail with the ship when the ship put to sea. The group demanded the return of money that allegedly had been stolen from the wallet of one of the group. The ship’s leadership failed to act quickly enough to defuse the situation and later that day, a group of seven white sailors were set upon by the group and beaten. It took the arrival of a Marine detachment to restore order. Six black sailors were charged with assault and rioting.

    I was beaten by people I knew. People I thought were my friends. Unable to flee, I assumed a fetal position as they stood over me and beat me with hand-carved Philippine canes that were bought in Subic Bay. I ended up with two broken ribs and my entire torso was black and blue.


  55. 55 | April 12, 2012 10:48 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    I was beaten by people I knew. People I thought were my friends.

    Startling revelation isn’t it. To discover that people you trusted, people you thought were your friends could in a single second turn on you and attempt to beat you within an inch of your life and that those very same people would never even consider their actions wrong.


  56. 56 | April 12, 2012 10:52 am

    @ MacDuff:

    I wonder how many nameless, young black men and children have died at the hands of other black men since Treyvon breathed his last?

    No outcry over that!


  57. citizen_q
    57 | April 12, 2012 10:55 am

    @ MacDuff:
    Wow!

    Terrible story.

    Did they ever find out who actually stole the money or if there was any money stolen?


  58. citizen_q
    58 | April 12, 2012 10:56 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    MacDuff wrote:
    I was beaten by people I knew. People I thought were my friends.
    Startling revelation isn’t it. To discover that people you trusted, people you thought were your friends could in a single second turn on you and attempt to beat you within an inch of your life and that those very same people would never even consider their actions wrong.

    Worse, justified on racist grounds.


  59. 59 | April 12, 2012 10:58 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    Wow!
    Terrible story.
    Did they ever find out who actually stole the money or if there was any money stolen?

    Probably spent on hookers in Olongapo…


  60. 60 | April 12, 2012 10:59 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    MacDuff wrote:

    I was beaten by people I knew. People I thought were my friends.

    Startling revelation isn’t it. To discover that people you trusted, people you thought were your friends could in a single second turn on you and attempt to beat you within an inch of your life and that those very same people would never even consider their actions wrong.

    Yeah, quite an unforgettable life-lesson. I was 19, raised in a middle class suburb and a product of Catholic schools. I came away not so much racist, but keenly aware of what happens when people are forced to choose between “tribes”. As I said yesterday, the civilizational veneer is as thin as an eggshell and equally as brittle.

    BTW, a you can imagine it was a lot worse than described. The Navy, understandably, really tried to pat this down as best they could and they did a pretty good job.


  61. 61 | April 12, 2012 11:04 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Zimmerman requests a bench trial. And I don’t believe there’s anything Smiley and her minions can do about it. It’s the DEFENDANT who has the right to demand trial by jury.

    @ RIX:

    I’m sure Holder is working overtime filing civil rights charges against this animal. Get busy jerk! The filing window closes at 4:30.


  62. 62 | April 12, 2012 11:07 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ RIX:

    I’m sure Holder is working overtime filing civil rights charges against this animal. Get busy jerk! The filing window closes at 4:30.

    By filing Charges, I presume you mean that Holder will be filing charges against the victim.


  63. MikeA
    63 | April 12, 2012 11:07 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Thats the key part here. If Zimmerman goes free, and from the articles above and other reading, it looks likely, Holder will go after him for violating civil rights. Then Zimmerman’s lawyer can ask why the NBPP isn’t getting charges for violating Zimmerman’s rights. This will be intertesting.


  64. 64 | April 12, 2012 11:12 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    Wow!

    Terrible story.

    Did they ever find out who actually stole the money or if there was any money stolen?

    ng for

    Actually, I knew nothing about the “stolen money” until I saw the article. Personally, I think it was an explosion looking for a spark. We were on an extended WesPac cruise and were working 16 on 8 off schedules. The black guys were increasingly discontented and saw racism in everything. Tensions were very high and for weeks, and they were buying these carved Philippine canes/clubs and wielding them menacingly. One day, quite unexpectedly, it exploded. Black guys were roaming the ship, beating their white shipmates at random and I was in the wrong place at the wrong time.


  65. 65 | April 12, 2012 11:12 am

    MikeA wrote:

    Then Zimmerman’s lawyer can ask why the NBPP isn’t getting charges for violating Zimmerman’s rights. This will be intertesting.

    Hell, Zimmerman’s Lawyer if he/she has a single functional braincell in his/her head can demand that the NBPP be brought up on Federal RICO charges for placing a million dollar dead or alive bounty on Zimmerman.


  66. 66 | April 12, 2012 11:15 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Of course! I mean here was this guy minding his own business robbing a house and she interfered.

    @ MikeA:

    Holder’s all gin and no fizz -- just wanted to get down with “the brothers” in this case. He’d have to prove Zimmerman’s actions were based on race. Good luck with that, after the information on his defense of the homeless black man. Second of all, Zimmerman was acting under color of authority, which is usually what these actions are reserved for.


  67. 67 | April 12, 2012 11:16 am

    Excuse me…..Zimmerman was NOT acting under color of authority.
    Back to Starbucks -- apparently I haven’t fueled up enough.


  68. huckfunn
    68 | April 12, 2012 11:22 am

    @ MacDuff:
    There was quite a bit of racial tension when I was in the Army from 1972 to 1974. When I was at Camp Samaesan, Thailand (on the Gulf of Thailand about 80 miles south of Bangkok) there was some group of black agitators on base who held meetings and would post notices about who was the “racist of the week” and crap like that. Nothing ever came of it while I was there, but I remember thinking that if any white soldier, singlely or as a group, would have done the same thing or made the same statements, they would have immediately gone to the slammer.


  69. RIX
    69 | April 12, 2012 11:24 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    @ RIX:

    I’m sure Holder is working overtime filing civil rights charges against this animal. Get busy jerk! The filing window closes at 4:30

    Holder only sees a Civil Rights violation when
    the alleged crime is against “my people”
    If it is perpetarted by “my peope”,
    hey he didn’t see anything.


  70. 70 | April 12, 2012 11:25 am

    @ RIX:

    Just as he doesn’t see the crime of assault that Treyvon Martin apparently committed against Zimmerman. That doesn’t fit the narrative, so it can be overlooked.


  71. lobo91
    71 | April 12, 2012 11:26 am

    @ huckfunn:

    There was quite a bit of racial tension when I was in the Army from 1972 to 1974.

    It wasn’t all that much better when I joined in 1979.


  72. 72 | April 12, 2012 11:27 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Just as he doesn’t see the crime of assault that Treyvon Martin apparently committed against Zimmerman. That doesn’t fit the narrative, so it can be overlooked.

    Overlooked my shiny white ass, it’s pretty damned obvious that as far as Erick Holder is concerned a Black man assaulting a White man isn’t a crime at all, but a heroic act of valor and courage to be publicly celebrated.


  73. 73 | April 12, 2012 11:29 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    There was quite a bit of racial tension when I was in the Army from 1972 to 1974. When I was at Camp Samaesan, Thailand (on the Gulf of Thailand about 80 miles south of Bangkok) there was some group of black agitators on base who held meetings and would post notices about who was the “racist of the week” and crap like that. Nothing ever came of it while I was there, but I remember thinking that if any white soldier, singlely or as a group, would have done the same thing or made the same statements, they would have immediately gone to the slammer.

    Yeah, my cousin was in the Air Force and told me similar stories. Many people don’t realize that “The 60s” were happening in the military, just like they were happening “back in the world”. The military is a microcosm of society and suffers the same ills; they just suffer them differently.


  74. 74 | April 12, 2012 11:33 am

    @ lobo91:

    What about in the 80′s? My Uncle was in the Amy 82-87 and he never said anything about race relations.


  75. 75 | April 12, 2012 11:33 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Holder views it as an act of Liberation!


  76. 76 | April 12, 2012 11:36 am

    New Thread.


  77. citizen_q
    77 | April 12, 2012 11:36 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ huckfunn:
    There was quite a bit of racial tension when I was in the Army from 1972 to 1974.
    It wasn’t all that much better when I joined in 1979.

    Same here, I joined the same year. I had a black guy in basic that freely spouted the most vile Jew hatred I had every heard, and that was just basic.


  78. huckfunn
    78 | April 12, 2012 11:36 am

    @ lobo91:
    @ MacDuff:
    There were several blacks in my company (MPs, no less) who simply refused to show up for morning formation. The were simply left alone. They should have been put in jail, processed and dishonorably discharged.


  79. lobo91
    79 | April 12, 2012 11:38 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ lobo91:

    What about in the 80′s? My Uncle was in the Amy 82-87 and he never said anything about race relations.

    Things were somewhat better by then.

    We got a little pickier about recruiting, for one thing.


  80. huckfunn
    80 | April 12, 2012 11:40 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    Overlooked my shiny white ass, it’s pretty damned obvious that as far as Erick Holder is concerned a Black man assaulting a White man isn’t a crime at all, but a heroic act of valor and courage to be publicly celebrated.

    What Eric Holder carries in his wallet:

    Holder also carries in his wallet a card on which is written: “a black man’s race defines him more particularly than anything else.” Holder explained its meaning:
    I am not the tall U.S. Attorney, I am not the thin U.S. Attorney. I am the black U.S. Attorney … There’s a common cause that bonds the black U.S. Attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.” All blacks share a “common cause.”


  81. lobo91
    81 | April 12, 2012 11:40 am

    @ huckfunn:

    I was one of 6 whites in my first unit.

    It was also before they did chain of custody on routine urinalysis tests, which meant that they were useless as evidence.

    Interesting times…


  82. 82 | April 12, 2012 11:43 am

    @ huckfunn:

    So much for the “not color of his skin, but the content of his character” pipe-dream. I’ve become convinced that that isn’t what a majority of the black people in th eUnited States want. They want to be judged by their skin color, it is just that they want their skin color to be a pass.


  83. 83 | April 12, 2012 11:44 am

    @ lobo91:

    Ah OK!


  84. RIX
    84 | April 12, 2012 11:44 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    Just as he doesn’t see the crime of assault that Treyvon Martin apparently committed against Zimmerman. That doesn’t fit the narrative, so it can be overlooked.

    I think that we are seeing the attitude during the OJ Trial
    in the Fed Government, particularly the DOJ.
    “Hey we have been oppressed for 2000 years, now it’s
    payback.”


  85. huckfunn
    85 | April 12, 2012 11:47 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    I was one of 6 whites in my first unit.

    It was also before they did chain of custody on routine urinalysis tests, which meant that they were useless as evidence.

    Interesting times…

    When I was in Thailand (73-74) the only people who were drug tested were those who had been caught in possession. There was no base-wide regime for random drug testing of everyone. Thailand was the Big Rock Candy Mountain of the world’s most powerful pot and heroin. Strange days indeed.


  86. 86 | April 12, 2012 11:48 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ Carolina Girl:
    @ RIX:
    I’m sure Holder is working overtime filing civil rights charges against this animal. Get busy jerk! The filing window closes at 4:30
    Holder only sees a Civil Rights violation when
    the alleged crime is against “my people”
    If it is perpetarted by “my peope”,
    hey he didn’t see anything.

    WORST. ATTORNEY. GENERAL. EVER.


  87. huckfunn
    87 | April 12, 2012 11:49 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ huckfunn:

    So much for the “not color of his skin, but the content of his character” pipe-dream. I’ve become convinced that that isn’t what a majority of the black people in th eUnited States want. They want to be judged by their skin color, it is just that they want their skin color to be a pass.

    It’s what they’ve been taught for the past 40 years… race is the most important component of who they are.


  88. lobo91
    88 | April 12, 2012 11:51 am

    @ RIX:

    I think that we are seeing the attitude during the OJ Trial in the Fed Government, particularly the DOJ.
    “Hey we have been oppressed for 2000 years, now it’s
    payback.”

    Didn’t one of Holder’s “people” in that Black Panther voter intimidation case say something along the lines of, “You are about to find out what it means to be ruled by the black man”?

    I guess he was right…


  89. 89 | April 12, 2012 11:54 am

    BTW, I have yet to hear what precisely Zimmerman was doing wrong that day that justified Trayvon Martin jumping him. He saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood. He followed him. He did not confront him, he did not accost him. He was not the aggressor. If the facts as I have them are correct, it was Trayvon who turned around and assaulted Zimmerman after he had broken off pursuit and was returning to his car.

    Unless the special prosecutor has evidence that proffer a different set of facts, not only is she going to have a tough time, but Holder is whistling through his ass if he thinks he can make a civil rights charge stick. Which is what I imagine the Bureau has already told him.


  90. 90 | April 12, 2012 11:56 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    They want to be judged by their skin color, it is just that they want their skin color to be a pass.

    Well, if all of your hero’s were murderers, drug dealers, rapists and armed robbers, you just might not want to be judged by the content of your character either.


  91. 91 | April 12, 2012 11:57 am

    @ huckfunn:

    It is really sad. They are no different than the white supremacists of the Jim Crow era, only they lack the power to force society to live according to their racist views.


  92. Buckeye Abroad
    92 | April 12, 2012 12:12 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    i want to thank the obama administration for beating the dread of being labeled a racists right out of me.

    now i dont care anymore! i am emancipated from that foolish line of thought!

    You bought into that? Collective guilt is for suckers.

    This whole media trial is nothing but a distraction from real national issues and Barry and his hate merchants are using it for all its worth. It’s easy to see through, but distance does that. Sorry to hear the thug-want-to-be died, but that happens would you assault people. From what I read, sounds like the local DA called it right but I really don’t care.

    Zimmermann will be railroaded, he’ll appeal and win. By then the election will be long over and he’ll be forgotten about.


  93. RIX
    93 | April 12, 2012 12:24 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Didn’t one of Holder’s “people” in that Black Panther voter intimidation case say something along the lines of, “You are about to find out what it means to be ruled by the black man”?

    I guess he was right…

    I seem to recall that. Our post racial President has
    done a stellar job uniting us./


  94. taxfreekiller
    94 | April 12, 2012 1:12 pm

    Obama, Holder, Big Sis, Rev. Sharpton, Rev. Jackson, New Black Panthers and all that commie Earth First, we will tell you if you need a doctor or not radical shit,the low dog union thugs of the Red Commie Democrat Party are into.

    On Ammunition and amounts of Ammunition.

    http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/this-time-the-arms-race-is-domestic-146576805.html

    Who, What, When, Where,,,Why


  95. taxfreekiller
    95 | April 12, 2012 1:14 pm

    It is clear now that the jury in Fl. on Zimmerman will have one black person on said jury.

    The next jury,
    The next jury,
    “—”—-”

    Until


  96. taxfreekiller
    96 | April 12, 2012 1:23 pm

    Jury selection is a new world order art form.

    ie the jury in Amarillo Texas selected by Phil McGraw for Opra Winfrey when she slandered the meat packing companies.

    All they have to do is do a phy study to find the weak ones and put them on the jury.

    We live in a society filled with weak ones developed by the union thug teacher unions.

    @ Carolina Girl:


  97. soulstraw
    97 | April 12, 2012 7:15 pm

    Jesus Christ I’ve never seen a more disgusting attempt to past blame of the damages YOU people caused thann this. Borderline disgusting.

    Even though one thing you were right about. Obama being President would damage race relations, but the truth is people like you caused it. YOU a-holes are the real racists!

    Worse than they’ve been in years? The African American community accounts for 13% of the total population. The new voting laws passed by conservative state legislatures, and the immigation laws passed by these same legislatures are from predominately 99% of white males. The daily drumbeat of rightwing talkradio dedictes whole shows towards blatant racial stereotyping. The teaparty phenomena sprang up the day Obama took office with all kinds of coloful signage, and language towards the first African American President. They now have stooped to attacking his wife and daighters. I wonder just who it is that’s responsible for all of these racial woes? Hint: look in the mirror!

    Obama is the most divisive president in history, Please? that it is a ludicrously stupid thing to claim.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

    ” Second, Laura Bush and the Bush daughters were vilified by the left and I’m sure you took part in that as well.”
    The “Progressives were mean to Laura Bush!” meme is something that’s sprung up, I think, as a result of the unprecedented torrent of hatred toward our current First Lady.
    My recollection is that Laura Bush was generally respected. A few weeks back, I wondered if my memory was deceiving me, so I spent a few minutes searching the archives of Daily Kos, one of the most strongly left-wing blogs. It’s also a good choice because it’s driven by reader submissions with little filtering, as opposed to left-wing blogs like Talking Points Memo, which are the product solely of professional journalists.
    Here’s the search term:
    http://bit.ly/yhrfzo
    Of the some 1,300 hits found, the vast majority appear to be casual mentions, as she’s in the news.
    Some are negative when her name is attached to GW’s. Example:
    http://dailykos.com/story/2009/01/07/681086/-George-Bush-going-back-to-his-roots?via=search
    Some are positive — if perhaps backhanded compliments:
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/01/29/12991/-Thank-the-Gods-for-Laura-Bush?via=search
    I also found some occasional speculation on the state of the Bush marriage, and other musings on whether she was secretly Democratic-leaning.
    I could not find any posts that were dedicated to Laura Bush and which had the intent of painting her in a negative light. A good way to summarize DK’s coverage of Laura Bush over the eight years is that she was treated coolly — they rarely heaped praise on her, but she was largely treated with respect.
    I don’t think I need to show the data to draw a distinction vs. the right-wing media’s treatment of the current first lady. There are, of course, the common nicknames — “Wookie” and “Moochelle” — stuff that just didn’t happen with Laura Bush (the worst I could find in my search was a post that referred to Barbara Bush as “Babs”). But beyond that, there’s the stream of blog posts *dedicated* to the first lady. She has a big butt! She shouldn’t tell my children what to eat! She takes too many vacations! Her outfits are too expensive! Her outfits are too ugly! And so on — with the meme being that she’s simply not fit for the White House. These aren’t casual mentions — *entire blog posts* are regularly written.
    I may have missed some examples. Again, here’s the search:
    http://bit.ly/yhrfzo

    When you have recist remarks like Stephen.George’s “MOOCHELLE” it makes me sick to see it in print.

    Right wing loonies and racists are angry that a black woman can be First Lady and eat lobster, they want black women serving them food, not eating with them.

    Obama is not a Marxist. He is more of a social democrat. Marxists wish to overthrow the capitalist system to end exploitation. Social democrats wish to reform the current system to reduce inequality. based on his policies which all support capitalism.

    Obama is NOT a fraud! He’s exactly what he claims to be. A lawyer, former State and US Senator, who was born in Hawaii grew up in Indonesia.

    You can’t compare a person to an event, it doesn’t really make sense. 9/11 killed thousands and caused billions in damage. The President is rebuilding America. You inhumane racist and bornderline disgusting to compare a Presidency to the Worst Event EVER in American History.

    To say Obama is anti-American is to be anti-American.

    Calling the President a terrorist and domestic enemy is somewhere between insubordinate and treasonous. Unacceptable for anyone to say such things about the commander in chief. To publicly call the President a domestic enemy and a terrorist is seditious at best and mutinous at worst. So…Are you stupid because you believe such nonsense or are you a traitor for perpetuating known lies against your President? It’s quite simple, really. If he was the ‘worst criminal ever’, he would be in jail. He’s not. So you are either stupid or a traitor. So…Which is it? Time to start holding you dolts accountable for your nonsense again.

    You people are sick. Calling Obama evil because he doesn’t think or look like you. Bush doesn’t think or look like me, But never have I thought of him as evil.

    Obama is on the record saying he isn’t a Muslim, he’s a Christian. What else would you like him to do? Has anyone asked you to prove your religion?

    And since you defend your lies with another, I’ll assume Obama being Bi-sexual is a lie, too created by the homophobic right trying to make a quick buck.

    Sorry, YOU scumbags are the real racists here. The GOP is the party of racists, bigots, extremists, homophobes,etc.

    The Party of Hate.


  98. soulstraw
    98 | April 12, 2012 7:19 pm

    test


  99. soulstraw
    99 | April 12, 2012 7:20 pm

    Jesus Christ I’ve never seen a more disgusting attempt to past blame of the damages YOU people caused thann this. Borderline disgusting.

    Even though one thing you were right about. Obama being President would damage race relations, but the truth is people like you caused it. YOU a-holes are the real racists!

    Worse than they’ve been in years? The African American community accounts for 13% of the total population. The new voting laws passed by conservative state legislatures, and the immigation laws passed by these same legislatures are from predominately 99% of white males. The daily drumbeat of rightwing talkradio dedictes whole shows towards blatant racial stereotyping. The teaparty phenomena sprang up the day Obama took office with all kinds of coloful signage, and language towards the first African American President. They now have stooped to attacking his wife and daighters. I wonder just who it is that’s responsible for all of these racial woes? Hint: look in the mirror!

    Obama is the most divisive president in history, Please? that it is a ludicrously stupid thing to claim.

    ” Second, Laura Bush and the Bush daughters were vilified by the left and I’m sure you took part in that as well.”
    The “Progressives were mean to Laura Bush!” meme is something that’s sprung up, I think, as a result of the unprecedented torrent of hatred toward our current First Lady.
    My recollection is that Laura Bush was generally respected. A few weeks back, I wondered if my memory was deceiving me, so I spent a few minutes searching the archives of Daily Kos, one of the most strongly left-wing blogs. It’s also a good choice because it’s driven by reader submissions with little filtering, as opposed to left-wing blogs like Talking Points Memo, which are the product solely of professional journalists.

    Of the some 1,300 hits found, the vast majority appear to be casual

    I also found some occasional speculation on the state of the Bush marriage, and other musings on whether she was secretly Democratic-leaning.
    I could not find any posts that were dedicated to Laura Bush and which had the intent of painting her in a negative light. A good way to summarize DK’s coverage of Laura Bush over the eight years is that she was treated coolly — they rarely heaped praise on her, but she was largely treated with respect.

    I don’t think I need to show the data to draw a distinction vs. the right-wing media’s treatment of the current first lady. There are, of course, the common nicknames — “Wookie” and “Moochelle” — stuff that just didn’t happen with Laura Bush (the worst I could find in my search was a post that referred to Barbara Bush as “Babs”). But beyond that, there’s the stream of blog posts *dedicated* to the first lady. She has a big butt! She shouldn’t tell my children what to eat! She takes too many vacations! Her outfits are too expensive! Her outfits are too ugly! And so on — with the meme being that she’s simply not fit for the White House. These aren’t casual mentions —
    When you have recist remarks like Stephen.George’s “MOOCHELLE” it makes me sick to see it in print.

    Right wing loonies and racists are angry that a black woman can be First Lady and eat lobster, they want black women serving them food, not eating with them.

    Obama is not a Marxist. He is more of a social democrat. Marxists wish to overthrow the capitalist system to end exploitation. Social democrats wish to reform the current system to reduce inequality. based on his policies which all support capitalism.

    Obama is NOT a fraud! He’s exactly what he claims to be. A lawyer, former State and US Senator, who was born in Hawaii grew up in Indonesia.

    You can’t compare a person to an event, it doesn’t really make sense. 9/11 killed thousands and caused billions in damage. The President is rebuilding America. You inhumane racist and bornderline disgusting to compare a Presidency to the Worst Event EVER in American History.

    To say Obama is anti-American is to be anti-American.

    Calling the President a terrorist and domestic enemy is somewhere between insubordinate and treasonous. Unacceptable for anyone to say such things about the commander in chief. To publicly call the President a domestic enemy and a terrorist is seditious at best and mutinous at worst. So…Are you stupid because you believe such nonsense or are you a traitor for perpetuating known lies against your President? It’s quite simple, really. If he was the ‘worst criminal ever’, he would be in jail. He’s not. So you are either stupid or a traitor. So…Which is it? Time to start holding you dolts accountable for your nonsense again.

    You people are sick. Calling Obama evil because he doesn’t think or look like you. Bush doesn’t think or look like me, But never have I thought of him as evil.

    Obama is on the record saying he isn’t a Muslim, he’s a Christian. What else would you like him to do? Has anyone asked you to prove your religion?

    And since you defend your lies with another, I’ll assume Obama being Bi-sexual is a lie, too created by the homophobic right trying to make a quick buck.

    Sorry, YOU scumbags are the real racists here. The GOP is the party of racists, bigots, extremists, homophobes,etc.

    The Party of Hate.


  100. Brick
    100 | April 12, 2012 7:34 pm

    @ soulstraw:
    Welcome to Blogmocracy, Soulstraw.


  101. yenta-fada
    101 | April 12, 2012 7:38 pm

    @ soulstraw:

    Stop by anytime without the name-calling, and we can take it point by point. For example, why did Obama and his wife both lose their licenses to practice law? The massive coverup of the president’s past is indefensible and unprecedented. If he would just tell the truth (simple ones at that), the conjecture would go away. You lose all credibility by lumping us into the “Hater” category and running away.


  102. Brick
    102 | April 12, 2012 7:43 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    @ soulstraw:
    Stop by anytime without the name-calling, and we can take it point by point. For example, why did Obama and his wife both lose their licenses to practice law? The massive coverup of the president’s past is indefensible and unprecedented. If he would just tell the truth (simple ones at that), the conjecture would go away. You lose all credibility by lumping us into the “Hater” category and running away.

    All the Left has anymore is invective and ad hominems. If their ideas were really superior, they wouldn’t have to lie about them to get folks to buy in.

    How’re things up north?


  103. yenta-fada
    103 | April 12, 2012 7:45 pm

    @ soulstraw:

    By the way, the first lady has EARNED her reputation with a huge staff, a make up artist that charges $15,000 per DAY, extravagant vacations, and the use of the supposedly revered White House as a constant place to invite movie stars and atheletes. They have demoted themselves to celebrities who do not respect the seriousness and responsibilities of office. Moochelle describes her actions while she is telling everyone else how to eat and that they will have to make sacrifices. Ridicule is a fair response. Bush tolerated it.


  104. yenta-fada
    104 | April 12, 2012 7:47 pm

    @ Brick:

    Still Canadian up North. :-) Trying to be good neighbors.


  105. coldwarrior
    105 | April 12, 2012 7:50 pm

    soulstraw wrote:

    Obama is on the record saying he isn’t a Muslim, he’s a Christian. What else would you like him to do? Has anyone asked you to prove your religion?

    “my muslim faith”

    said obama on with stephie…

    remember that? outta the prez’s own mouth.

    care to continue?


  106. huckfunn
    106 | April 12, 2012 7:51 pm

    soulstraw wrote:

    test

    YOU FAIL. Off to the infantry. There’s a good lad.

    Next.


  107. Lily
    107 | April 12, 2012 7:57 pm

    @ soulstraw:

    OMG!!! Such hate and vile! Projection much.
    Do your research instead of going on your precious *feelings*.
    Can I say you disgust me? Because you do.

    On that test you had. You flunked.


  108. m
    108 | April 12, 2012 9:53 pm

    @ Lily:

    Notice how he dropped it and left? That comment was so full of bullshit where do you even begin?

    Showing id to vote is a conservative plot :roll: Showing id to get cash a g’vment check isn’t? The tea parties sprang up the day obama was elected? Really? Love how they try to rewrite history. The nic “Moochelle” has nothing to do with race and everything to do with mooching lavish vacations while the country drowns in debt.

    On and on and on…

    This person is delusional.


  109. 109 | April 12, 2012 9:56 pm

    @ soulstraw:

    The Democrats are the Party of hate also. Your rant is full of hyberbole. How the hell is requiring ID to vote racist? many states provide Ids for the poor. I don’t get how its racist?


  110. 110 | April 12, 2012 9:57 pm

    @ m:

    Showing ID is racist.
    ///
    I can’t figure it out.


  111. Buckeye Abroad
    111 | April 13, 2012 8:25 am

    @Strawsoul

    I feel doubly, relating back to your invectives, about you. Your choice of nick fits well considering the amount of strawmen you set up.

    Don’t choke on your hate.. you’ll need that to keep yourself warm.


  112. Prebanned
    112 | April 13, 2012 9:13 am

    soulstraw wrote:

    To say Obama is anti-American is to be anti-American.
    Calling the President a terrorist and domestic enemy is somewhere between insubordinate and treasonous. Unacceptable for anyone to say such things about the commander in chief. To publicly call the President a domestic enemy and a terrorist is seditious at best and mutinous at worst. So…Are you stupid because you believe such nonsense or are you a traitor for perpetuating known lies against your President? It’s quite simple, really. If he was the ‘worst criminal ever’, he would be in jail. He’s not. So you are either stupid or a traitor. So…Which is it? Time to start holding you dolts accountable for your nonsense again.

    Somewhere between insubordinate and treasonous is a pretty big range!
    Can you narrow it down a little?
    What part of the Bill of Rights applies to us little people?
    Free Speech, Freedom of Religion, Right to keep and bear arms, Limited Federal Powers?

    You will just have to choke on your hate until YOUR President can strip us of our Natural Rights, then you can ship us off to the reeducation camps.
    First things first.

    Article 3 -- The Judicial Branch
    Section 3 -- Treason

    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

    The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.


  113. Lily
    113 | April 13, 2012 3:11 pm

    @ m:

    Yep dropped a loaded strawman comment and left without even debating, not to mention he left it on thread that was no longer even active.
    Shows how much of a coward that poster was.
    Yeah everything is racist. Showing an ID to vote is not racist, but then again everything is racist now days. *spit*


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David