David Brooks, along with Peggy Noonan, Kathleen Parker, Chris Buckley, Colin Powell, JC Watts and Susan Eisenhower were called the Obamicans. These were Republicans who in 2008 voted and supported Obama. Most of those mentioned have now turned against the Pharaoh. David Brooks is still a die hard believer. He claims that Obama is a fiscally responsible Liberal. Yes, you read that correctly, Brooks believes Obama is fiscally responsible!
I’ve been critical of President Obama’s budgets. I’ve argued that while I like the way Obama preserves spending on things like scientific research and programs for the vulnerable, he doesn’t do enough to avoid a debt crisis.
[....]
Extremely senior members of the administration believe these sorts of criticisms are completely unfair and vastly underestimate their fiscal hawkishness. In this column, I thought it only fair that I provide you with a summary of their arguments.
First, their goals. They argue that it’s foolish to try to solve the debt problem with some drastic magic bullet all at once. It’s smarter to stabilize the debt while also looking after other needs, like protecting the vulnerable and investing in things that boost growth and mobility.
They argue that the president’s 2013 budget is a step toward fiscal stability that will also pave the way for bigger steps in the years ahead. They estimate that their budget would produce $5 trillion in budget savings over a decade. It would raise $1.5 trillion in new revenue by raising taxes on those making more than $250,000 a year.
[....]
Basically, what we’re looking at is a period of stability, administration officials say, which would soothe credit markets and give us time to make further adjustments. This, they conclude, is responsible prudence.
I’m not going to pass my own comprehensive judgment on this here. I’ll just say that my conversations reaffirm my conviction that Obama is a pragmatic liberal who cares about fiscal sustainability, who has been willing to compromise for its sake, but who has not offered anything close to a sufficient program to avoid a debt crisis.
But we have a campaign in front of us. If the president is truly committed to a strategy for progressive fiscal stability, as Bill Clinton was, he’ll make that the center of his campaign. He’ll earn a mandate. He’ll win over independents who want fiscal discipline but worry about the way Republicans get there.
David Brooks will vote for Obama. This clown is not a Conservative, but a Progressives masquerading as a Conservative like David Frum. His claim that the Pharaoh’s regime wants fiscal responsibility is just laughable. David Brooks is water carrier for the regime and he should not be taken serious. To him, Obama is our divine god-king who is leading America to a greater future. Brooks would be writing favorable of Stalin, Hitler or Mao is they were still ar0ound.
This is not a serious thread because David Brooks is not a serious commentator. He’s just a saner version of Charles Johnson.
Tags: Comedy, David Brooks, NY Times
These nitwits will say anything to get invites to the in cocktail parties.
David Brooks is a Pickle Puffer who smokes crack from a penis shaped crack pipe… That is all….
Nonsense!
doriangrey wrote:
I’ve suspected that for quite some time! Good to have confirmation.
Is this report from The Onion?
@ Speranza:
It seems like it.
Speranza wrote:
Nope. THIS is from The Onion.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/fda-urges-farmers-to-eliminate-antibiotic-use,27945/
Speaking of Christopher Buckley this comment about him from four years ago still rings true.
grambo wrote:
You know that an individual has totally Fluked their own reputation when people cast the most outrageous aspersions against their character and everyone who reads those aspersions says.. Umm, well yea…
doriangrey wrote:
I don’t subscribe to the “if we do that, too, then we’re just as bad as they are” school.
I will use whatever means necessary to demean and defeat the enemy.
I will do whatever I can to spread the truth about this guy
/
OT sort of from Drudge
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/secret-looking-ted-nugents-violent-anti-obama-rant-214835918.html
The Secret Service is looking into Ted Nugent. I certainly hope he has enough hookers and booze. lol
@ Speranza:
I don’t get why David Brooks isn’t supporting Romney. That’s his kind of republican.
Rodan wrote:
Because Romney doesn’t have the right creases in his pants.
@ doriangrey:
You think its that? That David Brooks fantasizes about some Obama loving.
yenta-fada wrote:
Hmmm, the same Secret Service that just tried to set Obama up for assignation?
Rodan wrote:
He did love the crease in Obama’s pants…
@ doriangrey:
I just find it out. Romney is the most Liberal Republican since Nixon and people like Brooks are not embracing him. Mitt is one of them.
Rodan wrote:
Apparently Mitt isn’t one of them, not Marxists enough or something. Isn’t that scary…
@ doriangrey:
Yeah it is really scary.
Buffalobob wrote:
There, fixed that for ya!
@ doriangrey:
I’ve taken to simply calling Romney by his first name. Now get 20,000 screaming Hockey Fans to do the same:
“WIL-LARD!
WIL-LARD!”
Rinse & Repeat….
This is the Gergen school of conservatism. Or as we say on the internet…mobies.
doriangrey wrote:
I notice that the powers that be are giving screwy luis farrakahn a pass for his recent statement about people killing their leaders.
citizen_q wrote:
Well of course, he has two get out of jail free cards, one for being black and one for being Muslim.
ICK alert from WZ: Holder’s people go to Trayvon town.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/04/17/secretive-doj-force-watces-trayvon-protests/
@ yenta-fada:
The best quote from your link…
“I will stand by my speech,” he said, and then upped the ante by heaping more scorn on Democrats, describing Wasserman Schultz as a “brain-dead, soulless, heartless idiot.”
Most of these folks (Brooks, et al) don’t actually believe anything they are saying.
In many cases, they simply cannot admit they were SO WRONG about Obama.
I’m hoping we see this reflected among the general population in November. Many people have a hard time admitting flaws or mistakes out loud, but voting is anonymous.
I’m glad this is a comedy thread. I love comedy. This is funny too!
@ Urban Infidel:
OMG -- love the sunglasses. LOL.
Dolphin wrote:
This obscure DOJ ‘crs’ is HIRING. They are ‘assisting’ people (specifically Blacks and Muslims) who are having ‘community’ problems.
http://www.dojcrsjobs.us/about.html
Bumr50 wrote:
Most of these people are exactly like Obama: they are credentialed, but not educated.
They accepted him as one of their own because he had the proper hecksher (kosher certification): Columbia and Harvard and Sidley Austin. You can go farther than that, if you want—Alinsky, “community organizer,” nicely-mellowed Sixties radical connections which tapped into their own college nostalgia. Better accent and credentials than Al Sharpton, less angry-sounding than Jesse Jackson or Farrakhan. He was—is—credentialed up the wazoo.
If they questioned whether the credentials actually stand for anything, or merely conceal the absence of any genuine achievement, their entire worldview would crumble—because most of them are just as vacuous and ignorant as Obama himself. It goes far, far beyond admitting that “they were wrong about Obama”; if they question his credentialing they must confront the possibility that they are wrong about themselves and their friends and associates.
And that they will never do.
Dolphin wrote:
I know! The wheels! The tires! OHMGGD.
@ yenta-fada:
Shaking head in discussed.
OTOH -- job creation?
///
@ yenta-fada:
You can be a Conciliation Specialist:
http://www.dojcrsjobs.us/careers.html
yenta-fada wrote:
The dictionary in my head reads Conciliation Specialist as “appeaser” and “enforcer”, but that’s just me…
@ Dolphin:
Disgust
Stupid auto correct trying to read my mind again.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Yeah. I noticed the black paint-spraying anarchist and the other anarchist with a megaphone. OWS support vehicle. Well spotted.
David is really a democrat, thier mascot is a braying, worthless, jackass.
Prebanned wrote:
s’up!
Prebanned wrote:
I can’t stand when they describe him as a conservative. He is no where near to being a conservative.
Rodan wrote:
Nixon was very, very liberal.
Rodan wrote:
Poppy Bush was pretty liberal himself.
@ yenta-fada:
Hey ‘Fada!!
WOT WOT!
doriangrey wrote:
He actually did say that was one of his (Obama’s) virtues. I guess you have to check your integrity at the door when you work for The New York Times.
Rodan wrote:
Brooks does not want to jeopardize his Georgetown dinner party invitations.
Rodan wrote:
I wonder who David Frum will support? 60/40 he will find a reason to support Obama.
Prebanned wrote:
Speranza wrote:
See my #31.
@ Speranza:
RINO’s dilute the brand name.
The Republican Party is riddled with inflitrators.
Woo-hoo! Arizona voter ID law upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals!
If the (ultra-liberal) Ninth Circuit upheld this, I’m betting most of the other ones are upheld too.
@Speranza
@Rodan
I think Rodan should call up Ted Nugent and get him on blogtalk radio. He might just go for it. Rodan would be great at interviewing him.
@ yenta-fada:
Been workin a bunch again, which is good.
I am trying not to think about November.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
whoooT!
@ yenta-fada:
Hey, yenta. That’s a fabulous idea! lol
I can only assume Andrew Sullivan has really damning photographs of Brooks at some party and his black mailing him.
Either that or Brooks had a stroke and it turned him into a Democrat.
Speranza wrote:
“Poppy…yessss….Poppy…Poppy will put them to sleeeeeeeeeeeeeep…”
—The Wicked Witch of the West
@ Speranza:
Kinder gentler!
Prebanned wrote:
Glad to see that you’re working. I was gonna ask, but thought it might be too personal. Jeez Louise, November will be here very soon.
@ Speranza:
Actually Frum is all in for Romney. He claims the Liberal wing of the GOP has won, so he’s all for Romney. AT least he’s being honest.
@ EBL:
Brooks doesn’t want to be racist and he wants to be cool.
Rodan wrote:
There’s a “Frumious Blandness Snatch” Alice in Wonderland joke in there somewhere.
@ Speranza:
Romney comes from that wing of the GOP. So far at least Romney is fighting Obama.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
His Frum Forum went offline. He now rites for Daily Beast.
“My Way or the Highway”: the Petulant President threatens to veto the highway funding bill unless Keystone Pipeline provision is removed.
He kind of reminds me of a Muslim cabdriver refusing to take a fare unless the bottle of wine is tossed.
@ yenta-fada:
I am self-employed, and sometimes self-unemployed.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Hopefully, we show O hole the highway.
Rodan wrote:
Tina Brown’s “The Daily Beast” -- why am I not surprised? Meghan Mac and her boobs write for “The Daily Beast” too.
Prebanned wrote:
The fate of the nation depends on it.
Rodan wrote:
That is what I was hoping for. A commitment to victory.
Prebanned wrote:
Charles Johnson is also. lol
Rodan wrote:
In Frum World the perfect candidate would be the pasty faced David Cameron but alas (for him) he is British.
Prebanned wrote:
I am a big tent Republican but I cannot stand squishy candidates who refuse to fight such as McCain and the Bush’s.
@ Speranza:
Cameron who is the Left of Tony Blair. I never thought the British Tories would be the Far Left Party and Labor the conservative one.
We live in interesting times.
@ Speranza:
This election is the first American Pharaoh (Obama) vs. The Heir to Richard Nixon (Romney).
Its going to be nasty.
Obama ate dog meat.
@ Rodan:
There is something about Obama that is just not real.
Speranza wrote:
I believe that the President and Congress work for the American People, not the other way around.
The People make up this Nation, not its government.
The Constitution exists to safeguard us from the government.
That is my tent.
Rodan wrote:
Margaret Thatcher was the exception. Most Tories are as useless as Labourites.
Prebanned wrote:
Ummm, ok.
@ Rodan:
There is every indication he’s eaten an amoeba that now traverses his brain
@ Speranza:
sorry ha ha
@ Speranza:
This story is disgusting.
@ Speranza:
John Major was really lame.
Speranza wrote:
Is there really anything about Baby Doc Baraq that is real??
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Certainly not his surgically altered nose.
@ yenta-fada:
Oohh, that is a great idea.
Rodan wrote:
Actually he was not bad. His problem was coming after Thatcher whom he could never live up to, sort of like Bush I coming after Reagan.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
@ Speranza:
How do we know know his name is Barack Obama? I’m dead serious.
Rodan wrote:
You are to trust him, that’s how.
Rodan wrote:
No reason to think otherwise.
@ Speranza:
Was Major more Conservative than Poppy?
@ Speranza:
No records from his youth. For all we know his name is Frank Marshall Davis Jr. He’s a man of mystery.
Rodan wrote:
Yes he was but that is not setting the bar too high. He was more conservative than Cameron.
Rodan wrote:
I don’t care what his name is, it might have a Hajj in front of it for all I know -- but I do know he sucks as a POTUS.
@ Speranza:
Also Thatcher was not popular by the time she left in 1990 so I guess Major had to some what distance himself from her for obvious reasons.
Rodan wrote:
Good question.
Who the heck is Bathhouse Barry Sotero and where did he come from??
@ Speranza:
Its just scary that a man where there’s no paper trail gets elected. Hey did you see Michelle Obama said Obama has lead us out of the darkness and into the light? She’s playing up the god-king theme.
citizen_q wrote:
Just needed to be repeated.
The Nuge uses crude wording but all he really said was you don’t let the coyotes piss in your living room or it’s your own fault and the battlefield is the ballot box in November.
Screwy Louie wasn’t using metaphors.
Rodan wrote:
Obama has made the Bush years seem like sweetness and light to me.
Rodan, say it ain’t so about J.C. Watts! That one breaks my Heart.
@ m:
Calypso Louis is passed his prime and passed his time.
@ Speranza:
I just can’t believe they will try and play some messiah role for Obama. It’s sick.
Flyovercountry wrote:
J.C. Watts supported Obama in 2008 out of racial solidarity.
Rodan wrote:
They cannot brag about his record can they?
Speranza wrote:
I just threw up a little, in my mouth.
@ Flyovercountry:
Yup.
He apologized in 2010 for it.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Waht was so special about J.C. Watts outside of being a Black Republican?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
NO WAY!
@ Speranza:
@ Flyovercountry:
So did Condelleza Rice.
I think that it was 50/50 that Condi Rice voted for Obama too.
Obama is fiscally responsible. He’s responsible for the terrible shape the nation’s finances are in.
@ m:
That’s a very Liberal court. Even they saw its bs.
EBL wrote:
No mystery, he sold out in order to be the House Conservative at The New York Times. He is no Bill Safire.
Hannity has “the architect Karl Rove” on. Architect of Defeat is more accurate.
m wrote:
It is getting harder and harder for the democrats to steal elections aint it.
@ Speranza:
She did.
Rodan wrote:
Clueless Condi Rice was an awful Secretary of State.
Speranza wrote:
He was always one of the true House Conservatives, even up until he left the House.
O’Reilly is the dork that I watch occasionally. Tonight on the Pinheads/Patriots segment regarding the Secret Service-hooker flappadoodle someone emailed in the following: “With a name like ‘Secret Service’ one would think that they could get serviced in secret”.
Rodan wrote:
Vomit. It was a sickening read.
Flyovercountry wrote:
I never felt he was all that conservative. If he were white nobody would have noticed him (just like Mr. 9, 9, 9).
Well I feel better. At least Romney didn’t eat his dog
Speranza wrote:
Rodan wrote:
Condoleezza Rice, when still Secretary of State, compared “Palestinian” children—not the Jewish children threatened by “Palestinian” rockets, but “Palestinian” children—to the four girls killed in the Birmingham church bombing during the Civil Rights Movement.
At that moment I decided that Condi Rice was black before she was sane, or American, or working for American ally Israel in the Middle East; that it would be a cold day in Hell before I’d support her for anything; and that it would take a great deal of proof on the part of any black person—any black person—contending for national office before I would support them. The antisemitic narratives of the post-civil-rights “civil rights movement” are too strong in the black community for me to trust any of them without strong proofs.
Sorry to be blunt, but that is the way it is.
People were excited about Michael Steele (he was a good Senate candidate in Maryland and a good pundit too) until it was apparent that he sucked a big one as Chairman of The Republican National Committee. I would not be surprised if he votes for The One in November.
By the way I suspect that a lot of “Republican” elitists voted for Obama in 2008 including Meghan Mac.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
She was overrated. She was an expert about a nation that no longer existed (the U.S.S.R.) but the Establishment loved her and what can you do?
Rodan wrote:
I can’t believe America elected this man President.
Speranza wrote:
If for some reason Hillary Clinton were to run for President, I expect her to choose Michael Steele as her VP so as to run on a bogus “national unity” platform.
Speranza wrote:
She was a protege of James “Fuck the Jews” Baker.
Via Jawa Report
Swedish Official Eats ‘N-Word Cake’
Ah, that viking blood. It’s okay, though, Liljeroth is a liberal. From FriaTider:
And the best part of all? The cake screams when it’s cut!:
@ Urban Infidel:
Posted that earlier. It’s disgusting on so many levels it almost deserves a prize.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Allen West is no anti-Semite.
@ Urban Infidel:
That’s just o dehumanizing. Those tolerant Europeans! Not!
Speranza wrote:
She memorized a bunch of writings. What she didn’t develop is the ability to learn and assess quickly new events and real world systems
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
That’s exactly how I feel about it. Obama and Holder have set race relations back 30 years. And that’s a shame for people like Herman Cain and Alan West who I’m sure are unbiased, intellectual conservatives. They are the losers in the current storm of race baiting and that loss is no doubt celebrated in the liberal ranks.
huckfunn wrote:
It was undoubtedly the entire point.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
So wrong yet so good.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
A certain family in Texas loved her.
@ huckfunn:
I’m going to disagree. Allen West is beloved by many Conservatives. People will support him regardless of race. Here in Florida, despite the Martin thing, I don’t see much racial hostility.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Sadly J.C. Watts and Colin Powell too. Colin Powell owed every thing to Reagan and both Bush’s but racial loyalty and peevishness over losing a foreign policy debate were more important. Allen West is what J.C. Watts should have been.
Rodan wrote:
No, he’s not. He’s shown that in many ways. Condi Rice may not be an antisemite of the Farrakhan stripe, but she is a nicely constant, genteel antisemite who combines the anti-Jewish antipathy of a James Baker with the bedrock antisemitism of the Civil Rights Movement when it morphed/distorted itself into a “human rights” grabfest.
@ Speranza:
Are you seeing racial tensions in NY? I hear about Obama setting race relations back and I don’t see it here in Miami.
Rodan wrote:
I love Allen West’s fearlessness, patriotism, loyalty and bluntness.
Rodan wrote:
Not yet.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I have no use for Condi Rice. She’s a Muzzie lover.
Rodan wrote:
He is philo Semitic.
Rodan wrote:
A subscriber to her former boss’s “Religion of Peace” bullshit.
Speranza wrote:
We haven’t seen CAIR try him after his “NUTS!” caper
James Baker is one of the most loathsome political hacks I have ever seen.
I would be proud to be able to vote for Allen West.
I would be proud to be able to vote against Condi Rice—except that I’d be appalled if I had the opportunity.
waldensianspirit wrote:
They know better then to start with him. He is no Mike Bloomberg.
@ Speranza:
Powell is still supporting Obama.
Speranza wrote:
“One of the most loathesome political hacks” is an awfully crowded field.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I think Axelrod wins that bone.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Some folks were talking about running her for POTUS and I thought “Why because she is a woman and black?”
@ buzzsawmonkey:
What if Romney picks her?
Oh man, that would be a bad move!
Rodan wrote:
He should change the spelling of his first name to “Colon,” since he has proven himself such an asshole.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
It is a title that he has well deserved. Even though I voted for Bush in 1992 I was not upset that he lost and James Baker and Brent Scowcroft were two of the reasons.
Speranza wrote:
Yes. Labia and melanin trump experience and talent. Look at Obama’s Supreme Court picks—racist, sexist and DA/DT to the core.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Actually his name is pronounced l “Collin” not “Colon”.
@ Speranza:
The Pat Buchanan speech at the convention did damage that is still felt to this day.
Rodan wrote:
I would vote for Romney and pray for his continued good health.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Supporting Rice for those reasons actually is reverse racism.
Speranza wrote:
Not from where I stand.
Rodan wrote:
I’m not sure what part you disagree with. I’ve sent money to both Cain and West and I still believe in both of them. However I know of several people whom I have known as unbiased conservatives who are really having second thoughts about support for any black candidate.
Rodan wrote:
Major damage and the jowly ass hole eventually left the GOP anyway, thankfully. Wise people urged that Buchanan not be given a speakers slot but Bush wanting to placate the yahoos insisted that he get one. Shmuck! Bush deserved to lose.
Speranza wrote:
There is no such thing as “reverse” racism. There is only racism.
The pretense that “reverse racism” exists is what has allowed the black communities in this country to remain swamps of race prejudice while the rest of the society has altered dramatically.
On Facts:
Mike Huckabee supports David Dewhurst here in Texas for U.S. Senate.
Tax Free Killer and wife Ms Tax Free Killer support Ted Cruz for U.S. Senate in Texas.
Mike Huckabee says he cooked squirrels in his pop corn popper when he was in college.
Facts count up.
huckfunn wrote:
Money sent to 9 9 9 was wasted. Sorry to say that. Money sent to West is a good investment in America.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
What Buzz said.
@ taxfreekiller:
“David Dewhurst” -- are you making that name up?
taxfreekiller wrote:
Same here. Go Ted!
@ huckfunn:
No. Reverse racist means that in attempting to do an anti-racist thing, you are actually acting racist.
What Speranza said.
Speranza wrote:
I didn’t send money to 9-9-9 or a pizza mogul. I sent money against Romney. Wasted? Probably. I feel I sent it for the right reasons. Not the first time I lost money. Won’t be the last. Who did you send money to?
@ huckfunn:
I haven’t seen that yet.
Hey, what time you want the Doolittle Raid thread? At 8:00 AM as its set?
Speranza wrote:
No. You are chasing your tail and pissing on your boots. What Huck said.
James Baker would take a retainer as defense council from Hammibel Lecther with Hammibel chewing on a ladies fingers in his mouth at the time.
Rodan wrote:
Sounds good.
huckfunn wrote:
None of them. My guy Rick Perry flamed out and I am not a fan of Father Santorum or Newton P. Gingrich. I did send Scott Brown $20 to help him beat that anarchist Elizabeth Warren (and keep the seat in GOP hands) in Massachusetts though.
Ya, its just like spinhurtsya, you know like your silly ass name.@ Speranza:
taxfreekiller wrote:
Can you do a coherent post once in your life?
huckfunn wrote:
Now you are being insulting, condescending, and childish, goodbye. I do not want to interact with you any more.
@ Speranza:
You ever been in a fight to death in your long word, look down your nose at others life.??
Speranza wrote:
BWAHAHAHAHA. That’s a laugh coming from you. You are about the most judgmental, condescending, holier-than-thou person on this thread. Adios.
taxfreekiller wrote:
Yes while a member of the Gambino Crime Family I killed three men and all of them deserved it. The cops never solved it either.
huckfunn wrote:
Tough.
Speranza wrote:
Snort
@ huckfunn:
Fart
I call bull shit.
ass wipe@ Speranza:
Speranza wrote:
Poot
taxfreekiller wrote:
You keep thinking that peyote smoker.
low point, now go lower, its your play pen, your sand,
have at it.
Should I ever take a toke of peyote near you, smoke might get in where your eyes use to be.
@ taxfreekiller:
Fist bump….
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Everyone expected Obama to be liberal; had he been only liberal and not patently anti-American and even remotely competent, he wold have been the transformative figure many Americans had in mind when they elected him. Instead, he’s widened the racial faults that became exposed during the OJ trial. He’s been a transformative president in the way lung cancer is a transformative health condition.
When a black president is struggling in the general polls and enjoys a 90+% approval rating among blacks, there’s a serious problem -- among blacks. For far too long, being black has insulated people from all sorts of unacceptable and bizarre behaviors and it just has to stop. Obama isn’t growing unpopular because he’s black, he’s growing unpopular because he sucks at his job and the fact that his race should be a factor is testament to every ugly stereotype imaginable.
Speranza wrote:
Au contraire.
When you say, “in attempting to do an anti-racist thing, you are actually acting racist” you are referring to, e.g., whites being racist towards whites in the service of putting the thumb on the scale in favor of blacks—as in college admissions.
That sort of social self-mutilation is indeed part of “reverse racism”—but only part. The other part is the Derrick Bell Critical Race Theory belief—to which the President, his Attorney General, and many other members of the Administration subscribe—that whites cannot not be racist, and that blacks can never be racist.
This false belief is grounded in Leftist notions of “who has the power,” not on how individuals respond to other individuals. And it is from this “power, power, who’s got the power?” garbage that the whole “reverse racism” nonsense really springs.
There is no such thing as “reverse racism”; you are either responding to people on the basis of race first and foremost, or you are not. I have admitted, upthread, that I view black politicians with threshold suspicion as antisemites. Is this a “racist” position? Yes—regrettably—because it is a race-based position, that is, sadly, born of experience. Is it an impenetrable position? Absolutely not; as I said above, I would be proud to be able to vote for Allen West for higher office.
MacDuff wrote:
Barack Obama was not and never has been “liberal.” He is a revanchist. He ran as a revanchist—for anyone with the eyes to see and the ears to hear—his appointments have been revanchist, and he has governed as a revanchist.
His entire candidacy and governance have been about the black folks revenging themselves on the white folks. He is the insurgent slave in the cane thicket wielding the machete—without the nerve to actually wield the machete himself.
He is a coward and a murderer by proxy.
Ok guys, chill out we are adults here.
Very likely he did some deep thinking on how Charles Manson did his murdering…@ buzzsawmonkey:
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Yessir. I’ve wanted to do a thread which re-examines the notion that “We Are a Nation of Racial Cowards” Holder and Obama are the cowards and bullies at the same time.
Rodan wrote:
Says who?
Not all of us, some think they are teenage school teachers in training and allowed to scold any one of us at any time and we peons have to lap it up….@ Rodan:
Just give a moment to think of what the peyote slam in fact is, and if you do not know that much about race baiting you have never walked in a native Americans shoes.
Speranza wrote:
Isn’t he the son of the founder of The National Topsider, T. Coddington Van Voorhees VI?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
He’s 3rd World Liberation.
Rodan wrote:
Mugabe Lite™
The only good indian is a dead indian.
Well you know they can not hold the whiskey.
Just a freaked out apache gone nuts on peyote.
Very very nice uh?
Very mature I’m sure.
@ MacDuff:
The funny part is that Obama is not Black. He is Mulatto! He is Black for political reasons but until his Chicago days, didn’t live the Black experience in America.
Rodan wrote:
Revanchist, or 3rd world liberation -- both spell bad guy to me.
Evening, all.
The Osprey wrote:
A Romney voter is an Obama voter who’s been Mugabe’d by reality.
@ taxfreekiller:
I was just trying to get everyone to calm down, that’s all.
@ The Osprey:
Less killing!
@ Brick:
Obama is scum.
@ huckfunn:
Charles Johnson.
Rodan wrote:
“Scum?” “Scum?” That’s “alternative energy source algae” to you, pal…
@ Rodan:
Your post #197, why might I ask did you not ask some special person to tone down the race baiting comments?
Rather than “you guys”, seems single to me at that point.
@ taxfreekiller:
If you felt insulted, you had aright to answer back. I was just trying to clam everyone down, that’s all.
‘Nite, folks.
Rodan wrote:
Now, now. Scum at least has a rightful place in an organic food chain.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Sorry I just got here, Buzz -- looked like you were on quite a tear.
@ taxfreekiller:
I didn’t know the peyote comment was racist until you broke down the history. I was just trying to clam things in general. You explained why you got mad and I see why now.
Or do we have a two class posting thing just so I know my place.@ taxfreekiller:
taxfreekiller wrote:
I don’t think Rodan meant anything by it, really. Now Speranza on the other hand….
I keed.
Been awhile since I’ve seen you online, TFK…how’s life been treating you?
Life gave me my final test, Obama.@ Brick:
Rodan wrote:
Slightly less currency devaluation!
Rodan wrote:
Speranza knew exactly where he was going with that jibe and I saw it right off.
Speranza wrote:
Take the gun, leave the cannoli.
@ taxfreekiller:
No I was asking all to clam down. I didn’t know the peyote comments was racist until you told me. When I said you guys, I was talking in general for everyone to back off. I re-read it and see why you blew your gasket. I know now that the peyote reference is racist.
@ huckfunn:
I didn’t know what the Peyote reference was about until TFK explained it.
@ The Osprey:
Different asshole, same shit!
taxfreekiller wrote:
He’s testing many. I’m studying up for November. Without sounding dramatic -- November will be the crossroads for generations that follow.
jump school
run run run , pt, pt, pt.
jump off the pt stand, jump off the pt stand,
climb the 75′ tower, slip line jumb, knees and feet together,,
climb the 250 tower, jump off with the piss ant chute,
get in the plane and get pushed out and hope you packed it correct..
Obama well he packed our chute and pushed U.S. out,
Now What?
Rodan wrote:
We’re cool. I just had to flap some dust.
@ Brick:
To say the very lest. Like Rodan said eariler today obama isn’t the run of the mill liberal democrat. He is something totally different he wants the destruction the United States and has said that. Didn’t he say that the world needs to be on a better playing field? That the United States doesn’t need to keep other countries down?
He is destroying our country, our military, our economy, our standing in the world. He has been very successful at these things.
taxfreekiller wrote:
A Boy Scout, an old lady, and Obama are in an airplane that’s going down. The pilot says into the intercom -- “Good luck folks you’re on your own!” and then they hear him yelling, “Geronimo!” as he floats clear of the plane. (a little hat tip to TFK)
The three of them stare intently at each other as there are only 2 parachutes in the cabin. Obama quickly grabs one, puts it on and bails out. “So long, suckas!” he yells on the way down.
Now the old lady looks solemnly at the Boy Scout and says, “You take the last parachute young man. I’ve lived a long and happy life, and you have all of yours ahead of you.”
The Boy Scout replies, “Nonsense, ma’am.” and proceeded to strap the old woman into the parachute. “We’re both getting out of here alive.”
“What about you?” she asked with tears in her eyes.
“I’ve got the other parachute right here,” the Boy Scout said with a smile. “That jackass grabbed my backpack.”
Lily wrote:
I have to admit -- yes, he is doing all of these things and will continue to as long as he can. I can only counter with, the fabric of our republic is shockingly resilient and durable. Americans are what makes America great -- and will do so again in the not too distant future.