First time visitor? Learn more.

Book claims Republicans are genetically inferior

by Rodan ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Cult of Obama, Liberal Fascism, Nazism, Progressives, Republican Party, Special Report, Tranzis at April 26th, 2012 - 12:37 pm

I am no fan of the Republican Party as I feel that they are too beholden to Islamic interests and are run by a bunch of fraudulent mobsters, but I do not have a beef with the average Republican voter. Most Republicans still don’t realize the fraud being perpetrated on them by the corrupt party leaders. The Republican Party claims to stand up for Judeo-Christian values,  yet all they do is cater to Islamic interests and ignore the plight of Middle East and South Sudanese Christians. In reality they use well meaning  conservative religious Christians and Jews, but don’t give a damn about their interests. The opinion of the Saudi Ambassador or the Muslim Brotherhood representative counts more than the opinion of the Republican voter. However a new book by some Progressive loon takes it too far.

Chris Mooney claims that Republicans are biologically inferior. That’s right, in a theory that the Nazis would feel comfortable exposing, this Leftist claims that Republicans are mentally defective. This is nothing the typical Progressive mentality that their opponents are inferior.

Are Republicans genetically inferior to Democrats? That might sound like a preposterous question, but essentially that is the thesis of Chris Mooney’s latest book The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science — and Reality.

In a recent article, Mooney summarizes his case. “[I]t often seems there are so many factually wrong claims on the political right that those who make them live in a different reality.” He continues, “So here’s an idea: Maybe they actually do. And maybe we can look to science itself…to help understand why it is that they view the world so differently.”

Translation: Republicans are stupid and there has to be a biological explanation for it.

If Mooney’s argument sounds familiar to you, it should. It’s called “eugenics,” and it was based on the belief that some humans are genetically inferior. Taken to an extreme, it encouraged people to selectively breed in order to improve the gene pool and eliminate those who the elites determined were unfit. It was rightfully dismissed decades ago, but this does not stop a modern-day science writer from resuscitating it and applying it to political adversaries.

He isn’t the first to invoke dubious scientific reasoning to support a pet political belief. Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa got there first when he tried to make the case that liberals are more intelligent. Progressives applauded him for his keen scientific insight until he also tried to claim humans evolved to find African-American men attractive but African-American women ugly.

This is one of the long term goals of Obamacare, they want to determine who lives or dies. By trying to find traits that genetically determine who will be on the Right or Left, they will have mandatory abortions to eliminate the inferior. This is one of the reasons abortion is encouraged in the African American community.  Progressive whites and conservatives as inferior and thus need to be eliminated. That’s why they use terms like Neanderthal,  to imply genetic superiority over conservatives.

For as much as the Progressives like Charles Johnson rail against Nazis, Americans Leftists are their ideological cousins. Both American progressives and the Nazis believe in a master race and are Socialists. This book proves the evil nature of the Progressive movement.

 

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

7 Responses to “Book claims Republicans are genetically inferior”
( jump to bottom )

  1. eaglesoars
    1 | April 26, 2012 1:06 pm

    Progressives view Conservatives as inferior

    I’m going to take issue with this. I think progressives view conservatives as an existential threat because in general we avoid group-think.

    Liberals have a great need for external validation. That’s why they form hives -- they need some place to belong. conservatives, not so much. We don’t need AN OTHER to know our value.

    This Mooney book -- it is so typical. Do these people ever think about the world they advocate? If their intent is to murder -- and that IS their intent what happens when all their target population is actually dead?

    The power to kill with impunity and moral justification. Now THAT’S really validating, don’t you think?


  2. Speranza
    2 | April 26, 2012 1:29 pm

    Did selrahC write the introduction?


  3. Bob in Breckenridge
    3 | April 26, 2012 1:33 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Did selrahC write the introduction?

    If it’s written in crayon, yep. :)


  4. Mars
    4 | April 26, 2012 1:36 pm

    The continuing of support for Planned Parenthood by liberals exposes their worship of eugenics. They still praise Margaret Sangers name at University Campuses including here in MT.

    This is about the 20th thing I’ve read in the last year or two trying to show conservatives as inferior or mentally deficient.

    The odd part is this is coming from people that literally live in a different reality from the rest of us, the liberal world view is so twisted around and upside down, they would suffer a mental break if required to explain all the contradictions, if they didn’t have the support of the rest of the drones.


  5. Daffy Duck
    5 | April 26, 2012 1:37 pm

    This book appears to be another example of leftist projection.

    @ eaglesoars:

    Good analysis, I agree.


  6. Bob in Breckenridge
    6 | April 26, 2012 2:42 pm

    Proof that liberals are intellectually inferior to us…

    Sheila Jackson Lee

    Maxine Waters

    Nancy Pelosi

    Cynthia McCommie

    John Conyers

    Debbie Blabbermouth-Schultz

    Jan Schakowski

    Michelle Obama

    Barack Obama

    Hillary Clinton

    Eric Holder

    Timothy Geitner

    Stephen Chu

    Van Jones

    Alan Colmes

    Chrissie Matthews

    Ed Schultz

    Keith Olbermann

    Bob Beckel

    Leslie Marshall

    Rachel Madcow

    Al Sharpton

    Jesse Jackson

    David Axelrod

    Joe Biden

    And on and on and on I could go. F**kin’ libs are dolts.


  7. mfhorn
    7 | April 28, 2012 10:36 am

    Cindy Sheehag

    The vast majority of Hollyweird


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David