First time visitor? Learn more.

Romney to Obama: “It’s still about the economy…and we’re not stupid.”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Business, Conservatism, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Energy, government, Healthcare, History, immigration, Inflation, Media, Misery Index, Mitt Romney, Multiculturalism, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Republican Party, Socialism, taxation, Transportation, unemployment, Unions at April 27th, 2012 - 8:00 am

Predicting “a campaign of diversions, distractions, and distortions” from Obama over the next six months, Romney warned his opponent: “That kind of campaign may have worked at another place over in a different time. But not here and not now. It’s still about the economy…and we’re not stupid.”

I have to admit that so far I’m getting stoked listening to Mitt Romney in the early stages of the race for the White House. Romney came out with both guns blazing and ripped Obama for his distortions, distractions, obfuscations, and lies and warned the Obama regime that he’s not just going to sit back and take more of their distortions, distractions, obfuscations, and lies like that loser John McCain did in 2008.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I think we’re actually going to have a GOP fighter for the White House, who will fight to win, unlike what we had in 2008, which was an old man who was too concerned about being labeled a racist to put up a fight. McCain proved that just because you were a war hero almost half a century ago it doesn’t mean you still have that warrior’s mentality when it comes to doing everything you can to defeat your opponent.

McCain seemed just happy to be there, and if he won, he won, and if he didn’t, oh well, he still had his senate seat to go back to. So what we got was a pathetic campaign, run by a pathetic candidate, and that, along with the deification of our Dear Leader, by the propaganda wing of the dumocrat party, the mainstream lib media, and their tingling legs, etc., well, McCain was destined to lose.

But just listening to Gov. Romney lately, since he has locked up the GOP nomination has given me hope that thankfully, for once, we’re going to have a candidate who will not worry about offending Obama and being labeled a racist by libtard detractors, since we all know that will be coming down the road.

So, what should Romney do? As Former Clinton adviser James Carville summed it up nicely, back in 1992, when he was asked what the race between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush would hinge on, he said “It’s the economy, stupid”.

If Romney continues down this path and ignores the distortions, distractions, obfuscations, and lies that we’ll be hearing ad nauseum from the libs and their allies for the next 6 months, then this race will be what it should be- A plebiscite about Obama and his disastrous economic and fiscal policies that have not only not helped, but have made things exponentially worse for the vast majority of Americans since Obama took office in Jan. 2009.

We know Obama will still be blaming George W. Bush, and his lackeys will be using the same old tired libturd rhetoric they have used in every election, going back to Harry Truman, about Republicans being extremists who want the poor living in the streets and kids to starve, the air and water polluted, the non-existent war on women, illegals rounded up and deported, and claiming that they’ll take away grandma and grandpa’s social security.

So, Romney’s campaign needs to ignore the distortions, distractions, obfuscations, and lies, and focus like a laser beam on “It’s the economy, stupid”, and, as President Reagan asked in 1980, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”.

If he does that, then on Jan. 20, 2013, he will be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, and this 4 year reign of terror on our liberty and economy, by the Obama regime, will be thrown into the dustbin of history.

Then it will be left to the adults, the Republicans, who will also have control of the House and the Senate, to clean up the mess that has been made for the last four years by the children, the Obama regime and the dimocrats in congress.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

89 Responses to “Romney to Obama: “It’s still about the economy…and we’re not stupid.””
( jump to bottom )

  1. MikeA
    1 | April 27, 2012 8:17 am

    There isone thing in your line above that I actually would want:

    illegals rounded up and deported

    This should be US govt policy at all times. If you are here illegally then you will be deported. Simple. Other than that, agree with you 100%. Romney is sounding like a fighter and is punching back. Obama has never had someone who has fought back and it will be intersting to see him in a real fight.


  2. 2 | April 27, 2012 8:31 am

    Are you better off than you were four years ago? It all comes down to that, really, and how many of us can answer “Yes” to that question? If you aren’t part of the Dependant (Parasite) Class, chances are the answer to that question is “No” with loud emphasis. Politics is War. I hope Romney realizes that. Obama will be out to destroy him, so he should be out to destroy Obama. We shouldn’t go for squeaking by like Bush did, either. We should try to destroy Obama electorally. Go for a real mandate, and that may have enough coat-tails to bring us a solid Senate. I am afraid to hope too much, though. The GOP has disappointed me too many times for that.


  3. 3 | April 27, 2012 8:39 am

    One of the long shadows cast by presidents are Supreme Court nominations, not to mention Federal judgeships; let the current docket of the high court drive this point home. We must ask ourselves if even a “moderate” Republican President would have nominated Kagan or Sotomayor then do our damnedest to ensure no more Obama appointments.


  4. 4 | April 27, 2012 8:41 am

    @ MacDuff:

    A solid Republican minority would have kept Kagan off the Court. We need Republicans we can trust in the Senate, no matter who is President.


  5. MikeA
    5 | April 27, 2012 8:45 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    The problem with the parasite class is they will vote for whom ever will promise them the most stuff. Class warfare works on them since they want what those evil rich people have. Of course they don’t want to work for it and just want Obama to pay their mortgage. Those are a lost cause. The middle class can be swayed by the “Are you better off now?” argument.


  6. citizen_q
    6 | April 27, 2012 8:51 am

    @ MikeA:
    They seem to feel entitled to it. Why work for something that should be yours to begin with?

    They are pathetic and dangerous at the same time.


  7. citizen_q
    7 | April 27, 2012 8:55 am

    I hope we have a fighter this time.

    It was painful watching McCain rollover.


  8. lobo91
    8 | April 27, 2012 9:07 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    I hope we have a fighter this time.

    It was painful watching McCain rollover.

    The only trick I saw him do was play dead.


  9. citizen_q
    9 | April 27, 2012 9:11 am

    LOL! Another obama myth bites the dust!

    CIA Memo Reveals Admiral Controlled bin Laden Mission

    Today, Time magazine got hold of a memo written by then-CIA head Leon Panetta after he received orders from Barack Obama’s team to greenlight the bin Laden mission. Here’s the text, which summarized the situation:

    Received phone call from Tom Donilon who stated that the President made a decision with regard to AC1 [Abbottabad Compound 1]. The decision is to proceed with the assault.

    The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven’s hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out. Those instructions were conveyed to Admiral McRaven at approximately 10:45 am.

    Only the memo doesn’t show a gutsy call. It doesn’t show a president willing to take the blame for a mission gone wrong. It shows a CYA maneuver by the White House.

    The memo puts all control in the hands of Admiral McRaven – the “timing, operational decision making and control” are all up to McRaven. So the notion that Obama and his team were walking through every stage of the operation is incorrect. The hero here was McRaven, not Obama. And had the mission gone wrong, McRaven surely would have been thrown under the bus.

    The memo is crystal clear on that point. It says that the decision has been made based solely on the “risk profile presented to the President.” If any other risks – no matter how minute – arose, they were “to be brought back to the President for his consideration.” This is ludicrous. It is wiggle room. It was Obama’s way of carving out space for himself in case the mission went bad. If it did, he’d say that there were additional risks of which he hadn’t been informed; he’d been kept in the dark by his military leaders.


  10. citizen_q
    10 | April 27, 2012 9:11 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    citizen_q wrote:

    I hope we have a fighter this time.
    It was painful watching McCain rollover.

    The only trick I saw him do was play dead.

    What about biting the hand that feeds him?


  11. 12 | April 27, 2012 9:27 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    One of the long shadows cast by presidents are Supreme Court nominations, not to mention Federal judgeships; let the current docket of the high court drive this point home. We must ask ourselves if even a “moderate” Republican President would have nominated Kagan or Sotomayor then do our damnedest to ensure no more Obama appointments.

    Good morning Mac, I actually heard something out of Sotomayor that makes me think she might not be as liberal as we have been led to believe (apparently she seems to be leaning towards being pro Arizona’s SB 1020) . I am hoping against all hope that she ends up giving Obama a serious case of buyers remorse. :twisted:


  12. 13 | April 27, 2012 9:29 am

    What’s with all of this “Obama’s cool” crap? I just saw GW Bush mountain biking with disabled vets; he looked trim, healthy, impeccably dressed for the occasion and wearing very nice shades. When Obama’s shown on a bike, he looks like a nerd who’s never really done such a thing and is praying he doesn’t fall over in front of the press. Yeah, he has a pretty good jump shot, but he doesn’t exactly strike one as “athletic”.


  13. mawskrat
    14 | April 27, 2012 9:32 am

    @ MacDuff:

    remember Obamies flat tire photo?


  14. 15 | April 27, 2012 9:35 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    Yeah, he has a pretty good jump shot, but he doesn’t exactly strike one as “athletic”.

    Even Erkel had a pretty good jump shot… When photographed from just the right angle…


  15. 16 | April 27, 2012 9:36 am

    doriangrey wrote:

    Good morning Mac, I actually heard something out of Sotomayor that makes me think she might not be as liberal as we have been led to believe (apparently she seems to be leaning towards being pro Arizona’s SB 1020) . I am hoping against all hope that she ends up giving Obama a serious case of buyers remorse.

    Top o’ da mornin’, Dorian. Yeah, she was kinda ripping into that Solicitor General….she said something to the effect of “do you have anything else?”, as I recall. I was a bit shocked. Then again, the administration’s case seems pretty weak and is being argued by a Solicitor General who’d increasingly looking like a punching bag.


  16. citizen_q
    17 | April 27, 2012 9:37 am

    @ MacDuff:
    Buyer’s remorse for backing such a horrid loser. Hand in hand with rationalizations to ease the cognitive dissonance not being able to dump him.


  17. 18 | April 27, 2012 9:38 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Obama can’t run on his record. Romney will destroy him if this election becomes a refferendum on Obama’s performance in office. So they have to come up with some other reason to vote for Obama. If this is really the best they can come up with, they are in trouble. The candidate’s “coolness” is something you see when running for President of the szenior class in high school, not when running for President of the United States.


  18. 19 | April 27, 2012 9:38 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    she said something to the effect of “do you have anything else?”, as I recall.

    Yup, she also said, “You’re really not doing a very good job of selling this” Which is SCOTUS speak for, dude your argument sucks…


  19. 20 | April 27, 2012 9:39 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Even more damaging than the Supreme Court is the circuit courts. That’s where Presidents can do damage.


  20. 21 | April 27, 2012 9:40 am

    mawskrat wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    remember Obamies flat tire photo?

    I do :D Who the hell rides a bike in long pants? Geez……


  21. 22 | April 27, 2012 9:40 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Romney needs to run on the Obama Boom! I am doing a headline, GDP came in lower than expected!


  22. 23 | April 27, 2012 9:41 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Its a media image created to make Obama a divine like Pharaoh.


  23. lobo91
    24 | April 27, 2012 9:43 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama can’t run on his record. Romney will destroy him if this election becomes a refferendum on Obama’s performance in office.

    Well, that depends on the meaning of “record,” to borrow a Clintonism.

    Do you mean the actual facts of what he’s done while in office, or what he claims to have done, with the full backing of the MSM and the resources of Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks to help?


  24. 25 | April 27, 2012 9:43 am

    Rodan wrote:

    GDP came in lower than expected!

    Expected by whom? Certainly not by me.


  25. 26 | April 27, 2012 9:45 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Obama can’t run on his record. Romney will destroy him if this election becomes a refferendum on Obama’s performance in office.
    Well, that depends on the meaning of “record,” to borrow a Clintonism.
    Do you mean the actual facts of what he’s done while in office, or what he claims to have done, with the full backing of the MSM and the resources of Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks to help?

    Good morning Lobo, hows the shoulder doing? How’s Leia?


  26. lobo91
    27 | April 27, 2012 9:47 am

    @ doriangrey:

    The shoulder’s fine. I’m going in tomorrow to have the stitches removed. That should make things a little easier, at least when taking a shower.

    As for Leia, she doesn’t call or email much. Last I heard, she was doing fine.


  27. mawskrat
    28 | April 27, 2012 9:48 am

    yep Obamie is a dork


  28. 29 | April 27, 2012 9:52 am

    @ lobo91:

    what he claims to have done, with the full backing of the MSM and the resources of Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks to help?

    They will go all out for their beloved Pharaoh!


  29. 30 | April 27, 2012 9:54 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    As for Leia, she doesn’t call or email much. Last I heard, she was doing fine.

    What? After all the peanut-butter pretzels? How dare she be so caviler… :grin:


  30. lobo91
    31 | April 27, 2012 9:58 am

    @ Rodan:

    We’ll probably see 3-d campaign ads with CGI crowds of admirers…


  31. 32 | April 27, 2012 10:03 am

    @ lobo91:

    I wish you were joking, but That’s what they will do. They might even do a CGI scene where Obama is floating in the air and parting the clouds!


  32. lobo91
    33 | April 27, 2012 10:05 am

    @ Rodan:

    They’ll create crowds of happy people who are driving new Volts they paid for with money from the jobs Obama created for them.


  33. 34 | April 27, 2012 10:08 am

    @ lobo91:

    Don’t forget the negative advertising. There will be video of Romney killing puppy-dogs and throwing grandmothers off of cliffs. Really. Unfortuantely that i sno exaggeration. I expect that this will be the nastiest, most negative campaign ever. I just hope Romney is prepared for what is coming, and will punch back twice as hard. Politics is War…


  34. mawskrat
    35 | April 27, 2012 10:11 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    knife to the hilt


  35. 36 | April 27, 2012 10:13 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Don’t forget the negative advertising. There will be video of Romney killing puppy-dogs and throwing grandmothers off of cliffs. Really. Unfortuantely that i sno exaggeration. I expect that this will be the nastiest, most negative campaign ever. I just hope Romney is prepared for what is coming, and will punch back twice as hard. Politics is War…

    Yes, Obama and company are going to go negative, but it may not work as well for them as they expect, it hasn’t been working very well against Romney so far, and we know all to well that if the Romney people decide to go negative, they can get very nasty. So Obama and company going negative might just well bite their own asses off.


  36. 37 | April 27, 2012 10:14 am

    @ mawskrat:

    Absolutely. Take no prisoners. The Democrats are the number one enemy. We have to understand that if we are going to win. This isn’t some Marquis of Queensbury rules match. This is a knife fight. Obama understands that. We are already seeing him testing the waters for his direction of attack.


  37. 38 | April 27, 2012 10:17 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    This is a knife fight. Obama understands that. We are already seeing him testing the waters for his direction of attack.

    And by the grace of God Romney seems at this point to understand it as well, let us hope and pray that the indications are correct and that Romney doesn’t puss out.


  38. 39 | April 27, 2012 10:18 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Romney is a Nixon Republican, he will fight.


  39. RIX
    40 | April 27, 2012 10:26 am

    It’s time to pay Christina Eilman and her family for what city did to her
    Police released the disturbed woman into a dangerous neighborhood, where she was attacked and thrown out a 7th-floor window

    This is from this mornings Chicago Tribune.
    Six years ago a young woman from Caliornia created
    a disturbance at Midway Airport in Chicago. She is bipolar.
    Police took her into custody & kept her overnight at the lock
    up at 51st & Wentworth where she asked fot transport to
    a hospital & was unruly.
    In the morning the police released Christina Ellman on her
    own , ignoring repeated calls from the womans mother from
    Sacramento, to take her to a hospital.
    They notorious crime ridden Robert Taylor Homes are two
    blocks away. She was lured into it & was sexually assaulted
    and wound up flying out of a seventh floor window and
    suffered serious injuries. The perp just got let out
    after serving six years.
    An appellate court just ruled that the Chiacgo Police Dept
    can be sued for negligence.
    In the opinion a justice said that it was like releasing her
    into the Lions Den at Brookfield Zoo or a snake pit.
    The Radio is reporting the story with the big issue being,
    “Judge compares Black neighborhood to a zoo.”
    Can’t make this up.


  40. RIX
    41 | April 27, 2012 10:27 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Romney is a Nixon Republican, he will fight.

    Yes.


  41. 42 | April 27, 2012 10:36 am

    @ RIX:

    We are going to see more racial division in this election than we have seen since the Civil War. OR, at least, that appears to be Obama’s plan. How successful he will be at it is up in the air, but there are a lot of people on the Left that are receptive to that message. I think it is scary what they are trying to do. I hope that they fail completely.


  42. mawskrat
    43 | April 27, 2012 10:37 am

    time to head to the barn and get
    some stuff done


  43. 44 | April 27, 2012 10:42 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    The race stuff is a distraction. They want a Leftist popular Uprising ™.


  44. 45 | April 27, 2012 10:44 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    The truth is the Republican vs. Democrat thing is also a distraction. But I will explain that after the election. Obama must go first, then I will tell the truth as to what is really going on.


  45. 46 | April 27, 2012 10:53 am

    Krauthammer calling for War in Syria.

    But that’s false. It’s not the only alternative. Why aren’t we organizing, training, and arming the Syrian rebels in their sanctuaries in Turkey? Nothing unilateral here. Saudi Arabia is already planning to do so. Turkey has turned decisively against Assad. And the French are pushing for even more direct intervention.

    I wonder how much money the Saudi embassy is giving this tool.


  46. spinmore
    47 | April 27, 2012 10:53 am

    Hurry up Akmed, you’ve only got 3 hours left!

    And, oh look, there’s a 12 year-old . . .

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2135434/Outrage-Egypt-plans-farewell-intercourse-law-husbands-sex-dead-wives-hours-AFTER-death.html


  47. 48 | April 27, 2012 10:54 am

    On Fox they’re showing the Shuttle atop the 747 doing a flyover of NYC en route to Dulles and the Smithsonian. Say what you may about the Shuttle program, this has a distinct flavor of “man, we really used to be something!”

    We need to get rid of this SOB -- he’s killing our soul.


  48. spinmore
    49 | April 27, 2012 10:56 am

    @ MacDuff:
    you got dat right :(


  49. 50 | April 27, 2012 10:59 am

    @ MacDuff:

    I hate to break it to you, but Romney is against the Space Program also. He views it as a waste. This is a bi-partisan failure and one that will haunt this country in the future. Getting rid of Obama will not bring back the Space Program.

    The Chinese and Russians get it, we don’t. Read about Ming China when they scrapped their fleets. America thanks to Democratic sabotage and Republican short sightedness will regret the scrapping of the space program.


  50. 51 | April 27, 2012 11:01 am

    @ RIX:

    I think Chicago needs to find a Giuliani -- Daley jr, and Emanuel ain’t it.


  51. RIX
    52 | April 27, 2012 11:03 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    Yup,I blame Obama for picking the scab & ginning
    up racial animosities.


  52. citizen_q
    53 | April 27, 2012 11:04 am

    @ Rodan:
    Let the muslims murder each other. Its what they are. Its what they do. Who cares who ultimately wins? They will be our enemies nevertheless. Let them spend themselves on each other.


  53. spinmore
    54 | April 27, 2012 11:06 am

    Ukraine bomb attacks

    . . . i wouldn’t want to speculate as to who might do such a thing.
    ///


  54. RIX
    55 | April 27, 2012 11:06 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I think Chicago needs to find a Giuliani – Daley jr, and Emanuel ain’t it.

    The original Mayor Daley (Da Mare) knew how to run a city.
    He was mocked all over thhe countty, particularly for
    his diction, but we got it.


  55. 56 | April 27, 2012 11:07 am

    @ citizen_q:

    That’s my attitude. But the Democrats and Republicans do whatever the Muslim Brotherhood and House of Saud tell them to do. Expect a US war in Syria next year regardless of who wins.


  56. RIX
    57 | April 27, 2012 11:12 am

    Darryl Issa has prepared a contempt citation against
    the DOJ for being uncooperative during the Fast & Furious
    investigation ,by the House committee.
    I hope that this is a raging public scandal going into
    the election.


  57. 58 | April 27, 2012 11:12 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    I hate to break it to you, but Romney is against the Space Program also. He views it as a waste. This is a bi-partisan failure and one that will haunt this country in the future. Getting rid of Obama will not bring back the Space Program.

    The Chinese and Russians get it, we don’t. Read about Ming China when they scrapped their fleets. America thanks to Democratic sabotage and Republican short sightedness will regret the scrapping of the space program.

    I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it. What I’m positive of right now is that Obama’s even more unfit than he was in ’08 and I don’t have any inclination to constantly lash out at the only man on Earth than can remove him from office.

    Maybe you do, Rodan, but I don’t. Have at it and have a pleasant afternoon.

    Later.


  58. 59 | April 27, 2012 11:14 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    I hate to break it to you, but Romney is against the Space Program also. He views it as a waste. This is a bi-partisan failure and one that will haunt this country in the future. Getting rid of Obama will not bring back the Space Program.

    He may see it as a waste right now, but I suspect he is also a very fierce competitor, it wasn’t his belief in science for the sake of science that led John F Kennedy to go all in on the space program, it was his fierce competitive nature that did that. Romney could well be led to follow JFK’s lead for the exact same reasons.


  59. 60 | April 27, 2012 11:17 am

    @ MacDuff:

    I’m talking about the Space Program. This is a bi-partisan failure. When Newt brought up more space exploration, Romney called it a waste. His words not mine. The GOP Congress in the Ryan Budget is planning on slashing the Space program. Those are the facts.

    Getting rid of Obama is important. But lets not delude ourselves that it will usher in a golden age.

    Have a good afternoon and have a cold one on me!
    :-)


  60. 61 | April 27, 2012 11:20 am

    @ doriangrey:

    In all seriousness, come on. You guys are really starting to sound like the Obamabots in 2008. What next Romney will make the oceans recede and the dead walk.

    I will vote for Romney against Obama, but I refuse to worship him like Conservatives are doing now. Count me out in that regard.


  61. lobo91
    62 | April 27, 2012 11:21 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Romney could well be led to follow JFK’s lead for the exact same reasons.

    Let’s hope that he doesn’t follow JFK’s lead in any other areas…
    //


  62. Speranza
    63 | April 27, 2012 11:23 am

    I just saw the Space Shuttle fly over the World trade Center. Rodan check your email.


  63. 64 | April 27, 2012 11:26 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    In all seriousness, come on. You guys are really starting to sound like the Obamabots in 2008. What next Romney will make the oceans recede and the dead walk.
    I will vote for Romney against Obama, but I refuse to worship him like Conservatives are doing now. Count me out in that regard.

    No, I am doing something you are not. I am giving him the benefit of the doubt until he proves otherwise. A concept apparently completely alien to you.


  64. 65 | April 27, 2012 11:26 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Point of Clarification: Actually, that’s SB1070. 8)


  65. 66 | April 27, 2012 11:28 am

    @ MacDuff:

    No, the Enterprise is being flown FROM Dulles to NYC.


  66. 67 | April 27, 2012 11:29 am

    @ doriangrey:

    Anyone who supports the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda gets no benefit of the doubt from me.


  67. 68 | April 27, 2012 11:32 am

    Macker wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Point of Clarification: Actually, that’s SB1070.

    Stupid typos… :mad:


  68. 69 | April 27, 2012 11:35 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    Anyone who supports the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda gets no benefit of the doubt from me.

    Attacking and insulting people here isn’t making your case, it just makes you look unhinged and unreasonable.


  69. spinmore
    70 | April 27, 2012 11:35 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:

    Anyone who supports the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda gets no benefit of the doubt from me.

    What agenda? (read the link at #47)
    /


  70. 71 | April 27, 2012 11:39 am

    @ doriangrey:

    I’m not attacking anyone here. I am pointing out Romney’s and the GOP Establishment wanting war in Syria on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood. I am trying to wake people up that they are being misled on this and to not view Romney as a savior.

    Honestly I’m getting disgusted with politics. I see my nation committing suicide and being played for fools by the Muslims and no one else sees it.

    I rather talk about Charles Johnson honestly. Its more fun.


  71. 72 | April 27, 2012 11:41 am

    @ spinmore:

    The Arab Spring supported aint it grand!


  72. spinmore
    73 | April 27, 2012 11:43 am

    @ Rodan:
    Un-Friggin’ believable. Truth is stranger then fiction.
    These F’krs are nuts beyond belief.


  73. 74 | April 27, 2012 11:45 am

    @ Rodan:

    Regarding Romney…”Доверие, но проверяй!”


  74. 75 | April 27, 2012 11:46 am

    @ Rodan:
    @ spinmore:

    “Get away from Freedom…Escape to Arab Spring!”


  75. Bob in Breckenridge
    76 | April 27, 2012 11:47 am

    RIX wrote:

    “Judge compares Black neighborhood to a zoo.”
    Can’t make this up.

    I agree 100% with the judge. Sometimes hearing the truth hurts. But it is what it is.


  76. 77 | April 27, 2012 11:47 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    I’m not attacking anyone here. I am pointing out Romney’s and the GOP Establishment wanting war in Syria on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood. I am trying to wake people up that they are being misled on this and to not view Romney as a savior.
    Honestly I’m getting disgusted with politics. I see my nation committing suicide and being played for fools by the Muslims and no one else sees it.
    I rather talk about Charles Johnson honestly. Its more fun.

    @ doriangrey:
    In all seriousness, come on. You guys are really starting to sound like the Obamabots in 2008. What next Romney will make the oceans recede and the dead walk.

    If you don’t think this is insulting you are seriously mistaken. If you don’t know it isn’t even remotely true, then their is something wrong with you. I am trying really hard not to over react, but honestly rodan, your hyperbolic rhetoric is way over the top on this.


  77. spinmore
    78 | April 27, 2012 11:47 am

    Macker wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    @ spinmore:

    “Get away from Freedom…Escape to Arab Spring!”

    . . . sounds like a soap commercial :)


  78. Bob in Breckenridge
    79 | April 27, 2012 11:54 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:
    I hate to break it to you, but Romney is against the Space Program also. He views it as a waste. This is a bi-partisan failure and one that will haunt this country in the future. Getting rid of Obama will not bring back the Space Program.

    ROMNEY WILL RESTORE AMERICA’S SPACE PROGRAM
    That’s not correct…

    Leaders in America’s Space Program Write Open Letter in Support of Mitt Romney

    OMNEY WILL RESTORE AMERICA’S SPACE PROGRAM

    The U.S. space program is a strategic national asset, which makes critical contributions to our scientific knowledge, technological innovation, economic competitiveness, national security, and international leadership. We have watched with dismay as President Obama dismantled the structure that was guiding both the government and commercial space sectors, while providing no purpose or vision or mission. This failure of leadership has thrust the space program into disarray and triggered a dangerous erosion of our technical workforce and capabilities. In short, we have a space program unworthy of a great nation.

    Restoring the U.S. space program to greatness will require the leadership, management skill, and commitment to American exceptionalism possessed by only one candidate in this race: Mitt Romney. We support Mitt’s candidacy and believe that his approach to space policy will produce results instead of empty promises. As his long record of success in both the private and public sectors attests, Mitt will do more than provide our space program with an inspiring vision and mission of exploration. He will also set aggressive yet achievable goals, adhere to realistic budgets, and execute on a carefully drawn plan.

    As president, Mitt Romney will facilitate close collaboration not only within the government’s civil and national security space sectors, but also with the private sector and with research institutions. He will create conditions for a strong and competitive commercial space industry that can contribute greatly to our national capabilities and goals. And he will ensure that NASA returns its focus to the project of manned space exploration that uniquely affirms American strength and values around the globe. Under his leadership, America will once again lead the world in space.

    Scott Pace, Chair of the Romney Space Policy Advisory Group
    Director, Space Policy Institute, The Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University
    Former Assistant Director for Space and Aeronautics, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

    Mark Albrecht
    Chairman of the Board, USSpace
    Former Executive Secretary, National Space Council

    Eric Anderson
    Chairman and CEO, Space Adventures

    Gene Cernan
    Commander, Apollo XVII

    Bob Crippen
    Pilot, First Space Shuttle Mission
    Former Director, NASA Space Shuttle Program

    Michael Griffin
    Former NASA Administrator
    Former Head of the Space Department, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

    Peter Marquez
    Former Director of Space Policy, National Security Council
    Former Director of Special Programs, Department of Defense

    William Martel
    Associate Professor of International Security Studies, The Fletcher School at Tufts University
    Former Alan B. Shepard Chair of Space Technology and Policy Studies, Naval War College


  79. Bob in Breckenridge
    80 | April 27, 2012 11:59 am

    PIMF…

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    Rodan wrote:
    @ MacDuff:
    I hate to break it to you, but Romney is against the Space Program also. He views it as a waste. This is a bi-partisan failure and one that will haunt this country in the future. Getting rid of Obama will not bring back the Space Program.

    That’s not correct…

    ROMNEY WILL RESTORE AMERICA’S SPACE PROGRAM

    Leaders in America’s Space Program Write Open Letter in Support of Mitt Romney

    ROMNEY WILL RESTORE AMERICA’S SPACE PROGRAM
    The U.S. space program is a strategic national asset, which makes critical contributions to our scientific knowledge, technological innovation, economic competitiveness, national security, and international leadership. We have watched with dismay as President Obama dismantled the structure that was guiding both the government and commercial space sectors, while providing no purpose or vision or mission. This failure of leadership has thrust the space program into disarray and triggered a dangerous erosion of our technical workforce and capabilities. In short, we have a space program unworthy of a great nation.
    Restoring the U.S. space program to greatness will require the leadership, management skill, and commitment to American exceptionalism possessed by only one candidate in this race: Mitt Romney. We support Mitt’s candidacy and believe that his approach to space policy will produce results instead of empty promises. As his long record of success in both the private and public sectors attests, Mitt will do more than provide our space program with an inspiring vision and mission of exploration. He will also set aggressive yet achievable goals, adhere to realistic budgets, and execute on a carefully drawn plan.
    As president, Mitt Romney will facilitate close collaboration not only within the government’s civil and national security space sectors, but also with the private sector and with research institutions. He will create conditions for a strong and competitive commercial space industry that can contribute greatly to our national capabilities and goals. And he will ensure that NASA returns its focus to the project of manned space exploration that uniquely affirms American strength and values around the globe. Under his leadership, America will once again lead the world in space.

    Scott Pace, Chair of the Romney Space Policy Advisory Group
    Director, Space Policy Institute, The Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University
    Former Assistant Director for Space and Aeronautics, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

    Mark Albrecht
    Chairman of the Board, USSpace
    Former Executive Secretary, National Space Council

    Eric Anderson
    Chairman and CEO, Space Adventures

    Gene Cernan
    Commander, Apollo XVII

    Bob Crippen
    Pilot, First Space Shuttle Mission
    Former Director, NASA Space Shuttle Program

    Michael Griffin
    Former NASA Administrator
    Former Head of the Space Department, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

    Peter Marquez
    Former Director of Space Policy, National Security Council
    Former Director of Special Programs, Department of Defense

    William Martel
    Associate Professor of International Security Studies, The Fletcher School at Tufts University
    Former Alan B. Shepard Chair of Space Technology and Policy Studies, Naval War College


  80. waldensianspirit
    81 | April 27, 2012 12:08 pm

    Romney is a Planetist. Of course he’s for space program


  81. 82 | April 27, 2012 12:09 pm

    @ Bob in Breckenridge:

    Getting into space is amazingly complex, there is a reason that only the United States has ever managed to place a man on another celestial body, let alone put one there and bring him back alive.

    I personally am a member of one of the smallest fraternities on earth, mother f#$ker’s whose graffiti is currently on another planet and orbiting the earth. So I do know a little something about what it takes to get into space. :mrgreen:


  82. RIX
    83 | April 27, 2012 12:09 pm

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    “Judge compares Black neighborhood to a zoo.”
    Can’t make this up.
    I agree 100% with the judge. Sometimes hearing the truth hurts. But it is what it is.

    Which is another reason why there can never be an honest
    discussion of race in this country.
    If you committ the crime of truth, the race card comes out.


  83. waldensianspirit
    84 | April 27, 2012 12:15 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Getting into space is amazingly complex

    Na it’s smple. You put a bigass fire cracker underneath. The North Koreans did it just the other day


  84. RIX
    85 | April 27, 2012 12:16 pm

    Bob in Breckenridge wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    “Judge compares Black neighborhood to a zoo.”
    Can’t make this up.
    I agree 100% with the judge. Sometimes hearing the truth hurts. But it is what it is.

    Claification, the media spun it that way.
    The judge said the “Lions Den at Brookfied Zoo.”


  85. 86 | April 27, 2012 12:22 pm

    I’ve had about as much as I can stand for a while. It seems that trying to get behind Obama’s opponent in order to defeat him is the same as “worship” and expecting a “Golden Age”. Clearly I’m a rube for withholding judgement, and I’d be wise to enthusiastically embrace the dismemberment and deposing of both parties forthwith because in the very near future leaders not associated with either party will be running the country.

    Sorry, I’ve heard the “burn the whole thing down” strategy before. Venting is fine, but when negativism, vitriol and hyperbole is thematic, it becomes problematic -- it’s not only unhelpful, it’s destructive.

    Y’all can discuss, or not discuss, but I’m outta here for a week or so. I’m going to Disney World where, hopefully, skepticism and cynicism aren’t the primary motivators.

    I’ll see y’all when I see y’all, take care.


  86. SciFiGuy
    87 | April 27, 2012 12:43 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:

    Getting into space is amazingly complex

    Na it’s smple. You put a bigass CONTROLLED fire cracker underneath. The North Koreans did it just the other day

    Better..


  87. Will Consult for Food
    88 | April 27, 2012 2:20 pm

    MacDuff wrote:

    mawskrat wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    remember Obamies flat tire photo?

    I do Who the hell rides a bike in long pants? Geez……

    Do not give his image consultants any ideas. We do not need to see a photo of Teh Won in Spandex bicycle shorts.


  88. waldensianspirit
    89 | April 27, 2012 2:34 pm

    @ Will Consult for Food:
    And further revelation of his Biden mentioned stick


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David