Mitt Romney was being asked by a Colorado reporter questions about in state tuition, Gay Marriage and Medical Marijuana. Instead of playing the reporter’s game, he confronts her. Romney asks why is she not talking about important issues like the economy.
The confrontation begins at 2:10 in.
I hope Romney keeps this up and not play’s the media’s game.
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
The Diary of Daedalus
website design was Built By David
YESSSSS!!!
m wrote:
Make the fifth Column Treasonous Media look like the fools they are…
BWAHAHAHAAHAAAA!!!!!
sankehead carville smiles.
A guy like Rick Santorum would have waded into the trap.
While he does not have Reagan’s easy way with a joke while doing it, he does manage to deflect the MSMer away from her lib talking points while still being polite and friendly instead of openly confrontational like Newt, which as exciting as ti was to us, might have been a turnoff to “independents”.
This can work to our advantage. Some of these reporters may not agree with the scripted questions they are being handed.
Speranza wrote:
Yeah, Santorum built swamps then alerted the media as to when and where he would wade into them….
@ MacDuff:
Would have been a disaster. He probably would have lectured on the evils of homosexuality and call for holy damnation. He really was a straw-man.
Ya’know, we agree on far more than we disagree.
Methinks you’re evolving quite nicely…
My reply would be “Can a person be gay if they have no job and income?”