First time visitor? Learn more.

Yitzhak Shamir R.I.P.

by Speranza ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines, Israel, Palestinians at July 1st, 2012 - 8:28 am

Although much derided as a “hard liner” – Yitzhak Shamir has been proven to be right more often than not.

 

Editorial, New York Sun

It is with great sadness that the Sun has received the news of the death of Israel’s seventh prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir. He deserved a great deal more regard than he was accorded in the bien pensant precincts in America and Europe, where he was set down as an extremist and a stubborn … what? simpleton? Yet a decade after he left power it can be said that his policies, had they been pursued, would have put us in a better place than we are in today. His career, his character will repay careful study in a time when friends of both Israel and America are being serenaded by the sirens of appeasement.

Your editor first met Shamir in the early 1980s, when he was foreign minister of the Jewish state on a visit to New York. The minister received the young newspaperman and another editor of the Wall Street Journal for breakfast in his suite at the Hotel Regency. When he was asked about the issue of the day — external gas tanks for planes Saudia Arabia wanted — he replied with the word “oil.” All he said was: “Oiiiiiiil, Oiiiiiiiil.” Several years later, the young editor met with him again, this time in Brussels, when Shamir was on another mission as foreign minister, and asked him what he was doing in the capital of Europe. “Oranges,” he replied. “Orrrranges.”

Those exchanges are recounted in the Wall Street Journal in a review of Shamir’s memoir, “Summing Up.” They give a sense of one of his qualities, which is that he often seemed impatient or bored with the workaday details of modern diplomacy. This may have contributed to his perception as a simple man. Instead it no doubt reflected his higher priorities, based on a clear-eyed view of what mattered most in the long struggle of the redemption of the Jews in their own state in the land of Israel. What an extraordinary role he played in it, from his days in the underground organization known as Lehi through the search for peace that brought him in 1991 to Madrid, which might be called the last realistic parley.

Shamir was in the leadership of Lehi when, in 1944, its agents assassinated Lord Moyne, the highest British official in the Middle East. Moyne had been responsible for, among other things, Britain’s default in the affair of the Struma. The refugee vessel was sunk by the Russians after the Turks and British failed to find way to get its 768 mostly Jewish passengers to Palestine. The assassination shocked the world, including one of Zionism’s greatest friends, Winston Churchill. “If our dreams for Zionism are to end in the smoke of an assassin’s pistol, and the labors for its future produce a new set of gangsters worthy of Nazi Germany,” Churchill rumbled, “then many like myself will have to reconsider the position we have maintained so consistently and so long in the past.”

Yet Shamir never had any apologies for any aspect of his years in the underground. When, with the formation of the state in 1948, Lehi’s leaders were given amnesty, Shamir began a long and distinguished career above ground. He was the second longest-serving premier, after Ben Gurion. It was under his leadership that Israel attended the Madrid peace conference. The parley was established without crossing Shamir’s redlines; the Palestine Liberation Organization did not have a seat, nor did the Madrid talks include Arabs from Jerusalem. It was a more hard-headed, more principled process than the one for which it was abandoned, namely Oslo.

* * *

One of our favorite facts is that history doesn’t disclose her alternatives. The world will never know what would have happened had America and the other parties been held to the standards Shamir insisted on at Madrid. No doubt there are many who will scorn the very thought. But here we are a generation after Oslo, and the Iranians are building an a-bomb, the Arafat who was embraced at Oslo is gone without achievement, the Eyptians have just elected a president who will make it a priority to seek the release of the sheik who masterminded the first bombing of the World Trade Center, the Syrians are engulfed in a civil war, the Lebanese are victims of Iranian-based terror and tyranny, and the Europeans are more hostile to Israel than ever. So the world will miss this practical idealist who knew where he stood and wouldn’t budge.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

4 Responses to “Yitzhak Shamir R.I.P.”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | July 1, 2012 3:54 pm

    James “Fuck the Jews” Baker did not like him -- which made me like Shamir a lot.


  2. 2 | July 2, 2012 12:34 am

    The Brits hated him too. When I was there, Private Eye had a semi-regular lampoon of the man, “The Book of Shamir”; making Shamir out to be a warlord out of the Book of Judges.

    That just made me like him even more. But I’m evil that way. I like my people and I like civilisation. (Hi Dork!)


  3. 3 | July 2, 2012 12:38 am

    Ahem -- it wasn’t “the Brits”, it was the upper-class twits amongst the Brits. (The school I attended was the same school as produced Private Eye, and Monty Python for that matter. Think Heseltine.) As with the commenters here, I too have to remember that there’s a difference between the upper-class twits and the proles in England.

    I didn’t get to spend enough time amongst the Macc Lads set whilst I was there. I now realise that this was a failing on my part. I’d have at least got some beers out of it


  4. Speranza
    4 | July 2, 2012 8:36 am

    @ Zimriel:
    Most of the upper class Brits do not like Israelis (actually they probably can tolerate Shimon Peres).


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David