They’re outraged! They’re mad as hell and they’re not going to take it anymore! So being loser liberals, rather than just choosing not to go there, they have to try to organize protests and boycotts against the company.
Did you ever notice the similarities between liberals and children? How they have a temper tantrum if anybody does something they don’t like or don’t agree with?
Of course, the difference is, children are, well, children, whereas liberals are supposed to be adults. But do or say something that upsets them, and their inner-child comes out for all of us to see. And it’s pretty damn pathetic, if you ask me.
Us conservatives, being normal, don’t need to organize protests if somebody does something inconsequential that we don’t agree with.
The losers in Hollywood and the entertainment industry, for instance, do everything they can to push their anti-God, anti-family, and pro-gay agenda.
They literally try to jam it down our throats while calling us intolerant, all the while claiming that they’re “tolerant” of however others choose to live their lives. Yeah right. Liberals are, in fact, the most intolerant, hateful, and bigoted people you’ll ever meet (So try not to meet any. You’ll feel better).
Our way of “protesting and boycotting” those who offend our values is to simply not purchase the products the offenders are trying to sell. We actually have lives that are worth living, and to us, our free time is precious, so we choose to spend it with our families and friends, rather than marching in front of some business banging on drums and shouting stupid “Hey hey, ho, ho” rhymes that sound like they were written by a six year old.
So, to all you libs who love to protest, go ahead. Maybe one of these days you’ll eventually wake the hell up and ask yourself “I’m 70 years old and I’m still standing around shouting at those I disagree with, but to no avail. What is wrong with me?”.
What’s wrong with you is your ideology. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Chick-Fil-A Publicly Acknowledges It’s Conservative, Media Upset
When the head of a major fast food chain underscores his support for traditional marriage, lefty heads explode. Dan Cathy, son of Chick-fil-A founder S. Truett Cathy, told the Baptist Press July 16, that the conservative restaurant chain is, in fact, still conservative.
In response to a question pertaining to the franchise’s support of the traditional family, Cathy replied “guilty as charged.” The president and chief operating officer continued, “We are very much supportive of the family – the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that… we know that it might not be popular with everyone, but thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and operate on biblical principles.”
He reiterated his stance on the Ken Coleman radio show the next day. “As it relates to society in general, I think we’re inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say, ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage. I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think we can try to define what marriage is all about,” he explained.
Naturally, the Huffington Post, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and Advocate.com were among the many that were upset by the comments. Boycotts are now being organized, buzz is flying around the blogosphere, and people are leaving heated messages at both Chick-fil-A’s and Cathy’s Facebook pages.
Huffington Post contributor Lorraine Devon Wilke wrote an article ironically titled “Chicken with a side of Bigotry, Chick-Fil-A’s Ungodly Business Plan “His stance against gays and lesbians is not only distasteful,” she said. “It is stupidly counterproductive to business, and what could be holier than the bottom line?” she wrote.
Post food writer Tim Carman, who once pledged to stop buying Godfather’s Pizza because of his dislike of Herman Cain, created a poll to see who would join him in a boycott. The overwhelming majority of the respondents clicked the ‘everyone is entitled to their own opinion’ option so far.
This wasn’t the first time that Chick-Fil-A has been criticized for its conservative outlook though.
It has promoted Biblical values for 66 years. This is best exemplified by its closed policy on Sundays and philanthropic efforts.
Pro-gay groups have been claiming that the company donated almost $2 million to what were labeled “anti-gay groups” in 2010 by its charitable arm called the WinShape Foundation. The Marriage & Family Foundation received the bulk of the funds, but the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, National Christian Foundation, and Family Research Council received sizable sums too.
Tags: Leftists, Moonbats, Progressives
If they came out as Progressives, the media would cheer.
Their idea of an anti-Chick-fil-A chant is:
“Hey Hey! Ho Ho!
Anti-[Effeminate]s got to go!”
It’s still a free country and to be honest I hope it opens the floodgates that more conservative compainies aren’t going to crap shoved down their throats. I bet their stock goes up.
I like Chick-fil-a!
Chick Fil A has always been a faith based organization
& that is well known.
Why bother with a a temper tantrum if you are a Lib?
Just don’t go there.
I can’t stand Jane Fonda, but I never thought of
organizing a boycot of her movies.
But, I did get to piss on a photo of her face at the
Welcome Home Parade 26 years ago. Her likness was
at the bottom of urinals. Guys drank heavy to keep
pissing on her. Good times!
Here’s more tolerant lib scumbag politicians…
if i go for fast food, i go to chic-fil-a
i knew about their beliefs and practices years ago and have been a happy customer since.
@ RIX:
Every urinal at our VFW has a sticker with Jane Fonda’s face in a bullseye in it.
@ Dolphin:
@ coldwarrior:
I’ve never been there, but I’ll make to go there soon. The sandwich, Fries and brownie in the pic look yummy.
Y’all come on down to Georgia and we will fill you up with chicken biscuits and lemonade!
Truett Cathy and his family are pure class and not afraid of their convictions. They don’t open on Sunday to observe the Sabbath and they donate gazillions to worthwhile charities.
The entitled libs who have never created anything as substative as Chick-fil-a need to go soak their heads in a barrel of sprouts.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Isn’t that restraint of trade? How can you bar legitimate
company that presents np threat to the Community from
getting proper licenses?
Maybe they can fust call the stores Mosque Fil A
in Boston.
Chick -- Fil -- A is my daughters and her friends favorite fast food hang out place. They have generous franchise owners and donate to various organizations out here.
The corporation’s WinShape Foundation is impressive.
http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Company/Winshape
@ Lily:
The Dark Knight rises was a very Rightwing movie. Chick-Fil-A is very successful company. Conservatism sells.
@ RIX:
They just won’t give them a permit.
@ Will Consult for Food:
Yep,^^^^^^^^^^^^ what he said.
BTW, Chicago tried to keep Wal-Mart, another successful company the libs hate, out of the city. So Wal-Mart built stores in suburbs of the city, sometimes right across the street from city limits, so they not only saved their customers money from having to pay Chicago’s much higher sales tax, the suburbs gladly collected the sales tax revenue Chicago didn’t seem to care about or want. Like I’ve always said, the stupidity of liberals is astounding. But they wised up. There’s now 4 or 5 Wal-Marts in Chicago, and every time one opens, they get dozens of people applying for each job.
RIX wrote:
See my post above…
@ Calo:
The Winshape fouindation is the problem, according to some lib pro-gay rights groups. They claim it only gives money to conservative causes (which is good, if you axe me).
I’ve probably been in a Chic-fil-a only twice. However, I’ll now make it a point to go there when possible.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
Thst’s why I brought it up.
Rodan wrote:
There has to be a valid, and legal reason for a government entity to deny a permit. A principled stand for traditional marriage by the owners doesn’t indicate a bias against gays in their stores. The mayor’s statements have exposed him (and the city) to charges of bigotry. I hope the Chics go after his ass.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
That is a beautiful thing!
Rodan wrote:
No doubt, but I am wndering if Chic Fil A can dreag them
into court. The mayor has already made his reasoning
public.
huckfunn wrote:
It would be sweet irony if the Chics enlisted the ACLU to file a lawsuit against the City of Boston.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
I reread the post & I must be missing a section on
restraint of trade.
That doctrine generally refers to an attempt to stifle
competition, so it may not have any application.
huckfunn wrote:
Hoist em on their own petard!
What the hell is a petard anyway?
Lily wrote:
I am glad this thread pardon the pun came out. I read that the Mayor of Boston was going to try to block them from opening in his city. WTF! this is still America and what gives that gas bag the right to tell a private company what they can think? They should sue him big time.
huckfunn wrote:
A lot of cities run by libs use “living wage” laws to keep companies like Wal-Mart out. And the unions fight tooth and nail to keep them out, claiming they’ll lower wages for everyone, which is idiotic at its core.
huckfunn wrote:
Big F’en time
RIX wrote:
A small grenade or a fart, depending on which definition you prefer.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
They really are a good company and do make really good chicken! They were also my step sons first job and really made an effort to instill a good work ethic and worked around his school schedule.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
pay as much or better than McDonalds 7 they got nothing
Rodan wrote:
Yes it does.
RIX wrote:
That’s another thing the cities say when trying to keep Wal-Mart out, that it will cause small businesses to close. But I don’t see how that applies to Chick-Fil-A.
huckfunn wrote:
That’s what I think. Tje mayor has already tipped his hand.
I hve to trow some dead nimal on the grill.
Should be picking up Chick Fil A.
heh, heh, heh now O is gonna have to send the SS out at night to get waffel fries for Mooch.
brookly red wrote:
Big time. Sorry but people are getting real tired of leftists saying what they can and cannot do…sick and tired of this type of crap!
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
Yeah, they use that on Walmart, but it would be an absurd
Arguement here.
Hey {Calo}!
brookly red wrote:
Bloomberg, Charles Barron, and I believe Christine Quinn have all been involved in keeping Wal-Mart out of New York. Wal-Mart owns the land it wants to build on, but they keep coming up with excuses to block it.
Ikea had to fight tooth and nail to build a store down in Red Hook.
Rodan wrote:
Seems like that is setting themselves up for a lawsuit. A city cannot issue permits for one business owner and deny same to a business owner setting up an equivalent business. Wouldn’t want to have to endure the permitting and inspection processes however. Would enjoy advertising in that city’s market and building franchises on the city borders.
Chik-Fil-A is actually the only ‘fast food’ sandwich (the originsl) I ever eat any more, and that only rarely. Been that way for almost two decades, because everything else makes me regret eating it within 20 minutes, tops. Has absolutely nothing to do with the owners’ stance on social/religious/political issues. I’m an atheist, but I think it’s kind of nice that their employees can count on getting at least Sunday off (unless I happen to want one of their sandwiches on Sunday, of course.)
Lily wrote:
Viva los big gulp! death to tyrants!
@ Dolphin:
I’ve hired a few kids that started off in Chick-Fil-A.
Excellent customer service skills are instilled in their employees.
brookly red wrote:
Prejudice against large soft drinks is big-gulp-try, pure and simple.
Lily wrote:
{{LILY}}
Nice to see you here tonight.
but you know I kinda like when libs boycott things… it helps me to decide what to purchase and in the case of restaurants I know that I can enjoy my meal in a lib free environment… so rare in NYC
but you know I kinda like when libs boycott things… it helps me to decide what to purchase and in the case of restaurants I know that I can enjoy my meal in a lib free environment… so rare in NYC
when my local pizza guy throws a-holes out for wearing a Che t-shirt it makes the pizza taste better.
@ brookly red:
I don’t envy your geographical location brookly.
But, you made me laugh with that comment.
Who put me on the “your comment is awaiting moderation” list?
Is it just me or is the site running slow tonight?
Calo wrote:
Unlike?http://shine.yahoo.com/shine-food/burger-king-employee-stands-lettuce-busted-internet-163700384.html
http://shine.yahoo.com/shine-food/burger-king-employee-stands-lettuce-busted-internet-163700384.html
Identity politics is what the libs are all about and identity politics is all about bigotry. Divide and conquer. Pit one group against the other. The president of the U.S. or the mayor of Boston should represent all of their constituents to the exclusion of none. The bigotry of democrat regimes, from local to federal, is open, notorious and visible to all.
FYI--
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Not surprisingly, NYC will let Target build in the city even though they’re non-union like Wal-Mart. Why? Target is a subsidiary of Dayton-Hudson, and who used to run Dayton-Hudson? Matk Dayton, the dumocrat governor of Minnesota.
@ waldensianspirit:
Not just a little prick, but a tech-ignorant one, at that. Probably has a Darwin Award in his future -- I hope.
@ Bunk X:
Thanks Bunk, I didn’t even drop an F-bomb and got caught up in the filter.
@ Bunk X:
Yah, so I noticed…
huckfunn wrote:
yes but even more the suppression of business on the grounds of religious convictions is sooo unconstitutional and so un-American in nature it can not be ignored or waved away. The mayor must be made to back down in the name of religious freedom anything less is unacceptable.
Dolphin wrote:
google is displeased…
@ Calo:
Getting the same -- guess we’ve been bad! LOL
Mike C. wrote:
Dolphin wrote:
It’s running slowwwwwwwwww………
i have no comments in spam or in to be approved….
and somewhere out there a fat pony-tailed bastard eats a chicken sandwich alone in the dark…
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
its OK now i pointed my finger at google and they don’t like the light of day…
coldwarrior wrote:
I got an email a couples days ago from wordpress that one of Bunk’s comments was waiting for me to approve it. I’ve never had one of those before.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
see that is my problem with globalism… I can’t trust some scumbag from Minnesota to deal the cards but I am supposed to trust the UN? No it ain’t gonna happen.
@ coldwarrior:
Mine was the comment about running slow. It was eventually released. Site seems a little better right now. Of course it is now time to go finish dinner!
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
and freedom just an other word for nothing left to lose …
sure hope this generation is up for the challenge
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
No one’s immune when the spaminator is being dickish.
@ Dolphin:
When the spaminator is being a dick, insulting it just makes it mad.
hey it’s Sunday evening… I am thinking (fried) shrimp parm on linguine in a hot red sauce, side of broccoli-rabe, garlic bread and beer… sorry chick-fil-a, Vinny the pooch has been doing the right thing for 40 years now
everything seems to working properly now…
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
odd…
Blame it on Java
coldwarrior wrote:
yeah, just call them out and they back off…
waldensianspirit wrote:
coldwarrior wrote:
I don’t find it odd Bunk’s comments get quarantined.
waldensianspirit wrote:
The spaminator doth not have a sense of humor!
brookly red wrote:
The fact that so many people would vote for Obama is Exhibit “A” to the further fact that so few understand the nature or cost of their freedom.
huckfunn wrote:
/and so many of them are dead and reached back from the beyond to vote for him time & time again in divers places… oh my.
@ huckfunn:
I think that it exhibits that when people have a choice
between freedom & other peoples stuff, too many will
choose other peoples stuff.
RIX wrote:
yes, but then other people take their stuff elsewhere… damned fools.
@ brookly red:
Yup, people & capital will flee a second BHO term.
RIX wrote:
It is happening in France
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
This will have several unintended consequences:
1) Things that are banned in Boston tend to be a hit everywhere else. If Chick Fil A weren’t family-owned, people would be buying stock in it.
2) A lot of non-gay voters, and maybe even some gays, will be extremely reluctant to vote for any gay or lesbian candidate, for fear that he or she will irrationally push the gay agenda at the expense of everything else.
3) This will remind people that Boston is a town run by nanny-state jerks (the more things change, the more they stay the same) and they’ll have even less reason to visit or transact business there. The economy will suffer.
@ 1389AD:
To your #2..
I have several gay/les friends -- now maybe it is because it is in Texas, but almost all are conservative and not looking for any special laws or hand outs because of their orientation.
@ brookly red:
It is always the same. I used to work for a very wise
man who said that if you took all of the money & spread
it evenly, in two years the wealthy would again be
wealthy.
They won’t stay where there is no opportunity & their
money goes with them.
waldensianspirit wrote:
Oh yes it does. Especially when one carries spam in their boots. That’s always a tell.
huckfunn wrote:
The reality is that many will toss out whatever they know about their ‘man’ and vote for whoever is running on the Left. And that comprises about everyone short of 1%.
RIX wrote:
Substitute stuff with stash and we arrive at what the entitlement ignorants are talking about. Although they aren’t aware of the facts they fantasize about.
Carney: Obama Will Not Push For New Gun Control Laws In Wake Of Colorado Movie Shooting…
…for another 107 days
@ song_and_dance_man:
Think about how far things have gone. Five years ago
attacking success like Barack Hussein does would have
been met with derisiom.
Today it is debated.
1389AD wrote:
1. I guess California has lost it’s golden touch on spring-boarding new trends.
2. That makes sense, but try finding one that doesn’t want to push. They must understand that is why they must remain on the sidelines.
3. Every town, city or state that upholds the kind of socialism that is advocated by the Left is falling into disrepair. Who wants to set up shop in a big city that is going bankrupt like San Bernardino.
RIX wrote:
God willing next year it will be prosecuted, 300 million is a lot to enslave… 300 million armed? good luck with that.
Bunk X wrote:
I thought maybe it just doesn’t like you. You must have pissed it off somehow (again).
100!
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Geepers must be napping
@ waldensianspirit:
Just like the real damage of his Health Care plan will not be felt economically till he is long out of office.
These suckers are on the a fast track agenda ala the Japanese, but they are condensing the shebang.
brookly red wrote:
Me too, but I’m doubtful.
@ brookly red:
I am with you on that, but my concern is fraud, theft
& voter intimidation.
This election is going for broke & the Justice Department
is down with the criminals.
Hell, Holder is a criminal.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
and people are getting it… nothing like being out of work and having some inbred creation axing you questions to see if you be qualify fo benefits to make you see something is wrong.
RIX wrote:
but you can’t fool all the people all of the time… the worm is turning.
brookly red wrote:
Heads up: Marine Corps creates law enforcement battalions
huckfunn wrote:
yes I saw that… and I also see Assad being brought down by his
Alright, there is a vigil for the victims of the Aurora
shootings.
The Mayor has just introduced every city council member!
WTF does this have to do wthh anything except TV face
time?
RIX wrote:
Never let a crisis….
@ huckfunn:
Yes
RIX wrote:
well nothing really but what do you want them to do? call for gun control in an election year? take responsibility? offer an intelligent helpful solution?
Obama was just on punishing the nation with a speech.
He is in Aurora as “A husband & a father”
He went to the hospital just “To hug the victims”
Really, where was he when the Honkys in Joplin, MO
got clobbered?
I forgot, he wasn’t running for anything then.
RIX wrote:
The Left and the RINO Right ruined the Reagan Revolution.
What irks me is all too many miss what he is really saying. For instance, he clearly stated he has a Muslim faith. He says the state of the economy is fine. In my mind, in this case. he says what he means. It is in shambles and is fine with that. He bows to the Sauds. He preaches(speachifies) in Cairo, of all places. And I could go on about his many shady acquaintances throughout his somewhat hidden past.
And to your point, yeah, the Left give him a pass. I have no idea what they are thinking. Is it because he is not on the right that they give him license to push for a socialist state just because they hate the Right?
If that is the case then they are tools to the nth. If not, they are complicit to advocating the destruction of America as we used to know it.
Dolphin wrote:
If conservative, your friends presumably didn’t vote for BHO in the first place, unless the scales fell from their eyes since BHO took office. But this issue isn’t about the voters being gay or not -- I know that some gays don’t want gay marriage and some straights do. it’s about the candidates and whose agendas they fulfill.
If I recall, BHO said during his campaign that he was against gay marriage -- then he flip-flopped decided to support it afterward. Dunno if his reversal was because he had been promised big contributions from fundraisers supporting gay marriage, or because somebody was blackmailing him by threatening to “out” him.
Either way, many Americans are hurting these days in the bank account. As a matter of survival, they want to see a business-friendly agenda in their city, county, and state, as well as in the US as a whole. They do NOT want any roadblocks in the way of business development, especially if those roadblocks are based on pandering to identity-group politics. If somebody excludes a new employer from their city on the basis of the gay agenda, that hurts them in the pocketbook. If Boston voters can’t figure out what’s business-friendly and what isn’t, their city can end up going the way of Detroit.
George Costanza is wetting his bed
RIX wrote:
But the general level of wealth will be much lower, because of having grievously messed up the workings of civil society.
OK so the UN vote on small arms is coming up… I really hate to be this cynical but I gotta question the timing. Fast and furious is starting to take hold, I gotta question the timing. Something stinks here
Obama was just on punishing the nation with a speech.
me and 200 million other Americans didn’t bother to watch it.
@ song_and_dance_man:
?
I think that much of the Dem Party yearns for European
Socialism.
They ignore that BHO is a different cat. He sees no place
for religion in public life, well except for one.
brookly red wrote:
heaven yeah they are. I was thanking bout getting some ol clothes just to make the cheese line.
*note* This is bebonics. Cause I be.
brookly red wrote:
You saved yourself.
Oh man, Gov Higgenloper of CO is saying that the President
should have been gone an hour an a half ago. His staff is trying to make him leave , but Obama just
won’t leave the people.
They are shamelessly exploiting this.
@ 1389AD:
.
That is true, that’s how it works.
Good night y’all.
Bloomberg: Obama, Romney must ‘stand up,’ pledge to enforce current gun laws
Astounding irony and idiocy blend! Fast and Furious for $100, Bloomberg please
so when is the Honorable Mayor Mumbles going to deny permits to all Muslim businesses?
just askin’
@ 1389AD:
I wonder how the Sheriff of Pinal County is doing in his Congressional Campaign these days….
waldensianspirit wrote:
I don’t either, but when it happens I go for more.
Hickenlooper is turning out to be decent as governor here -- Clintonian, one might say. His tea-party legislature has kept him from enacting obvious boondoggles, and he’s restrained himself to fighting fires and cheerleading local businesses.
Colorado is #11 in best places to do business; last year it was #12. Mind you, this is a relative ranking and mainly due to Nevada hitting the skids . . . but at least Hickenlooper hasn’t made this place worse.
(I changed my registration too late to vote here in 2010; instead I voted by mail in the Texas election then. I would have voted Tancredo if I could. But I’ve been pleasantly surprised. If, G-d forbid, the GOP runs someone like Maes again and there’s no third-party alternative, I’ll vote for Hickenlooper.)
RIX wrote:
It was about B. Husseins criticism of success and how it’s acceptance, at least to him and the most faithful Left Wing radicals, came to be.
The subject of Moderate Muslims comes up here a lot. And let me bounce this meme off the walls and what we are dialoguing about.
I have always held the notion that most Muslims are not moderate but merely less faithful practitioners. This holds true in almost all faiths. There are those who associate themselves with their given faith, but they are only loosely affiliated. They go to the church, synagogue, temple or mosque of their faith only because they were grandfathered and is a measure of convenience due to other circumstances. They are the ones who attempt service but are more inclined to handle their holy book and do what is required to fit in.
We will find these people in every faith or cult. But if you look at Islam the most radical of the bunch—that do the most damage—are those who claim to be closest to Allah.
The moderates or rather slightly practicing Muslims are silent. They accept the consequences and conflicts the radicals of their cult promulgate. It is only when the radicals achieve victory do the so called moderates voice their absolute adherence.
RIX wrote:
the tin horn dictators in the ME are being offed…
brookly red wrote:
Have you noticed that some imams in Russia are also being offed? Not sure whatthat’s about. I’m sure it has something to do w/Syria but the details escape me.
A finer point.
Those who adhere to the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob strive towards a certain plan.
Those who adhere to the god of Ismael strive to disrupt the plan.
went to Louisville for a funeral today
his trucker buds are gonna sprinkle
his cremaines in all 48 states he drove
his big rig in.
how cool is that
song and dance man, to tie in your two threads: the reign of BarryOchus Epiphanes has convinced me that liberalism works the same way as Islam.
BarryOchus has pulled off the veil entirely. I am now convinced that there is no longer any such animal as a liberal. Any “liberal” now supporting this god-king and his mighty works (like Obamacare) is revealed as a Progressive at “best” and a worshipper of naked State power at worst.
@ song_and_dance_man:
Ishmael was not a muslim nor the father of it
I think Hickenlooper should re-register as an Independent.
Holmes’ Gun Club Membership Rejected Over ‘Bizarre’ Behavior
ht drudge
gotta go.
brookly red wrote:
And being replaced by some that have not been vetted. Well, at least some we hardly know anything about.
I have a gut feeling B. Hussein is warmed by what is going on in the ME.
@ song_and_dance_man:
A guy I work with, and that lives just a block or so away, is a Muslim convert. I haven’t asked why he converted, but have to admit I’m curious.
waldensianspirit wrote:
You’re right, and I did not key that.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
The ‘god of Ismael’ is no god at all…that is why I fixed that for ya!
mfhorn wrote:
To understand it is to first experience and admit spiritual force.
People who pursue spirituality can find it. Some find Islam, others astrology, and others some other mystical sideshow.
Today even, cosmologists are in agreement there is some ethereal substance, some factoring agent that sort of congeals the universe. I call that God. The God that made the Universe.
What people are looking for, and focusing on your acquaintance, is something that makes sense of the enigma of life. What is unfortunate is Islam focuses towards death while the rest of nature leans towards life.
@ Zimriel:
They are a cult.
@ Zimriel:
and I agree.
What the Left is ignorant of—maybe they don’t see it yet, or are comfortable with it—or agreeing with Islam is a fait accompli.
Rodan wrote:
Or worse
eaglesoars wrote:
\
the Russians don’t do PC
song_and_dance_man wrote:
A Disease, wrapped around an Ideology, inside a Cult!
Macker wrote:
lemmie break it down fo ya… if your not for me your against me
who said that?
brookly red wrote:
Yep. The Russians like the Chinese take matters of state and sovereignty seriously.
Macker wrote:
A cult wrapped around a bomb headed Hipster traveling in a Goat on every nations route 66.
brookly red wrote:
That would be the right wing radical two centuries ago that changed a perception of the world. Well at least for some.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
well the left likes to claim him for their own but he is kinda above politics if you know what I meam
song_and_dance_man wrote:
and it was 20 centuries, juss sayin
brookly red wrote:
Heh. One could have thought I was speaking of Smith.