This editorial makes perfect sense to me. Honestly; what is the case for Obama’s re-election? If there was one, he’d be making it. Yet all he has is attack smears, lies and more freebies for the freeloaders. The polls that show Obama tied or ahead arrive at their results only by oversampling democrats. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Barry is losing voter share in just about every one of the sectors that gave him the presidency in 2008. Jews, blacks, whites, yoots, and Catholics. What about the undervotes in PA, AR and CA where tens of thousands of voters in democrat primaries who went to the polls and either didn’t vote for Obama or voted for someone else?
Most polls see the presidential race as a dead heat. But several pundits, such as Dick Morris, say that Barack Obama should be well ahead some 90 days out if the incumbent is to win. Morris points out that historically, 75 percent of undecided voters ultimately fall to the challenger. If that were to happen, Mitt Romney will become the next president of the United States in a landslide.
The U-T believes there will be a landslide win for Romney, largely due to the failure of the Obama economic policies and repudiation of his attempt to move the country toward European socialism.
[...]
This country was founded upon Judeo-Christian values of free speech and freedom of religion. A tea party revolution launched the Revolutionary War and Americans in the colonies stood up against tyranny and those who attempted to change our beliefs. Obama’s European socialism and his high taxes, high unemployment, high gasoline prices and huge debt are being rejected at each turn. Americans are mad as hell and they are not going to take it anymore! We see, “Romney in a landslide!”
Read the entire article here. Romney in a Landslide. Hat tip Real Clear Politics
I, for one, would love to see this kind of Landslide!
Macker wrote:
BWAHAHAH…. That would work for me…
Baby Doc Baraq ain’t going to leave the White Hut without putting up one hell of a fight. His plans on stealing a second term have already started. Watch Holder’s DOJ trash the coming election with lawsuits against all the red states by November. The lawsuit against Ohio is just the start, it’s going to get a lot worse.
Wish I shared your optimism. Harry Reid (the Pederast) easily won re-election despite massive disapproval ratings by demonizing his opponent. As did DeVal Patrick and Michigan’s idiot governess (and Obama economic advisor) Jenni Granholm.
As someone once said, “If you don’t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.” I forget who it was.
In circumstances such as these, landslides toward Republicans are rarely foreseen by the “experts”. We will, however have to endure the “America had a tantrum” meme, but I don’t think that’ll surprise any of us.
@ V the K:
Baby Doc does have a record of using the Courts to spread Fear, Uncertainty, and Dread(FUD) of any one foolish enough to oppose him.
V the K wrote:
Um, the governor of Michigan is Rick Snyder (R)…
@ MacDuff:
BTW, If the Nevada GOP had run Danny Tarkanian against Harry Reid, instead of the incompetent Sharron Angle, Reid would be unemployed now.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
Part of the 2010 ass-stompin’ of the Left.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Fortunately for Romney (and us), there’s no divorce records to be used to vilify him.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Yep, with a repeat later this year.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
Rino Snyder hasn’t *always* been the Governor of Michigan.
Jeni Granholm easily won re-election in 2006 despite doing as much damage to Michigan’s economy as Dear Reader has done to the national one. She succeeded by demonizing her Republican opponent; a successful Republican businessman.
Don’t think Dear Reader wasn’t taking notes.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
If Danny Tarkanian was so great, how come he couldn’t beat the incompetent Sharron Angle?
Granted, her campaign sucked, Harry Reid successfully demonized her (as “pro-rape” in one memorial ad), and the establishment Nevada GOP turned on her out of pure spite. But I don’t think Tarkanian or that chick who lost would necessarily have prevailed either.
And I say this as someone who donated to Tarkanian’s primary campaign.
Romney and o-bumbler had better watchout! They have competition! roseann barr and chindy sheehan!
America one step closer to President Roseanne
TRENDING: America one step closer to President Roseanne
mug.yoon
Posted by
CNN Political Research Director Robert Yoon
Oh, brother!
“I tell you, he voted 37 times and I need the dough to pay him off!”
@ citizen_q:
Roseanne Barr doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell. Why? She deserted her husband and children when started to become famous. Not to mention there is so much that has come out of her mouth.
The only thing one could hope is she pulls some obama voters away from him.
Not to mention she wouldn’t know what the hell to do once she was in the White House …much like who we have in the White House now.
@ Lily:
It is dark comedy of farce and ego.
Anyone hear anything about the shooter and motive at that the Sikh Temple Shooting in Wisconsin today?
citizen_q wrote:
Indeed … I doubt she will ever be on the ticket. She is crazy on steroids.
@ Lily:
Sometimes even crazies have some redeeming qualities. Not so with this ticket.
I bet a pair of mirrors would double their audience.
I don’t see a landslide either way. Let’s stop thinking we have this election in the bag. We are up against formidable machine. We need to fight to get a victory.
Ask Dewey in 48 about thinking that an election was a given.
FYI I think Romney will win, but it will be very narrow.
@ citizen_q:
Barr has an ego the size of the moon and other planets. She is irrelevant and has lost the shine of (if there every was ) star.
She is white trash that made it to Hollywood somehow and she talks like it too.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Totally agree. Tarkanian would have clean Harry Reid’s clock. Angle I believe was a Democratic operative. Reid ran commercials attacking Tarkanian and Lowden to help her get the GOP nomination.
@ Rodan:
Oh I agree…it ain’t over til it’s over. I will not be confident of bho’s being voted out of the White House until he is actually voted out.
citizen_q wrote:
i bet the shooter thought that the sikhs are muslim.
citizen_q wrote:
Shooting at Sikh temple in Wisconsin leaves at least 7 dead, including gunman
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/05/possible-injuries-after-shooting-at-sikh-temple-in-wisconsin/#ixzz22iL1IO3P
Civilizations come and go. This one’s going. It just a matter of speed
@ coldwarrior:
That was what I am thinking as well.
@ Lily:
Doesn’t say who are what the shooter was. If it were a conservative it would be all over the place. Says nothing about him other than he was male and killed.
/sounds kinda shady.
waldensianspirit wrote:
waldensianspirit wrote:
as for myself, I’m becoming more uncivilized every day…you can’t stop me
Lily wrote:
a white male
@ Guggi:
Forgot to mention that..they sure did make sure that was put in.
@ Lily:
Thank you
This is all that I had heard about the shooting. He shot an officer multiple times and was killed. However no identity info is given, nor is there info if the person killed was the only one involved. Yet they quickly escalated the incident to one of domestic terrorism. Which is interesting.
@ Guggi:
@ Lily:
Sorry, jumping back and forth between cooking diner.
citizen_q wrote:
Trying to gun control laws passed. First I want to know who this person was…..they leaved that out …other than male. I didn’t see him being called white though. No information on the killer other than it being demestic terrorism. WTH? How do they know that?
Lily wrote:
In that article I didn’t see white male.
@ Lily:
My spelling is horrible today. Sorry!
Why the GOP picked Romney is beyond me. Drudge’s virulent attacks against Rick Santorum were a show case of blithering idiocy
frankly I could care less what color this guy is, his age, his motives, his choice of shoes…what good does any of that do?….’understanding his motives helps’ what?…you have to be anti social and even rude to go off and kill a bunch of people….wondering who he hates and why is irrelevant, just noise for the media…he just found a bunch of people he didn’t like and lit it up…there is no more to it of any value
I seem to recall a lot of violence between Sikh factions a few years ago, when Sikhs were agitating for an independent “Khalistan” separate from India.
Sikhs and Muslims have often been in conflict with each other back home on the subcontinent.
Rodan wrote:
We need to stop pumping up Obama. He’s no steenkin god-king. He’s a dork, a goon, a punk. He’s the most unpresidential POS to ever occupy the office. He needs to be treated with the scorn, disdain and derision that he deserves.
In Kashmir, it seems, you’re never too young for Jihad.
Looks like they’ve raised up a whole crop of Islamic Rage Boys.
@ Lily:
I find the quick jump to domestic terrorism…… well interesting.
The cynic in me suspects the grabbermint trying to gin up single non-muslim psychos to be terrorists so they can massages the stats like they do the jobs numbers in an effort to make it look like others engage in terrorism like muslims do.
Remember how much made of timothy McVeigh in many circles trying to cover for islam? My muzzie convert sister in-law tried that on me and I laughed in her face and threw it right back at on on serveral aspects. McVeigh did not commit mass murder in the name of Christianity, and Christianity does forbids such things. Islam commands it, and promises allah’s cosmic bordello to those who die doing it, etc… Plus the numbers.
Sorry got to run again to attend to make dinner.
The Osprey wrote:
The Osprey wrote:
not disregarding what you say, but there is plenty of murder and mayhem in this world…non of it shocks me…how do you prevent people from killing each other?…you can’t, it’s just that simple….humans are killers, and no gun law, rehab, prayer or anything else will change the facts
heysoos wrote:
Actually no. Lots of information to gather. At least there isn’t a trial going to happen.
coldwarrior wrote:
Within days of 9/11, there was some guy in Arizona, I think, who blew away a Sikh shopkeeper thinking he was a muslim. I think that guy got the death penalty. At any rate, I agree it may be not just a lunatic, but a misguided lunatic.
Please tell me Weasel Zippers isn’t going Charles Johnson on us.
@ Lily:
For one the victims families DO WANT AN ANSWER.
@ Lily:
the information is forensic…all added up makes no difference in the bigger picture…it’s for the media and their viewers…stand by for the next event
Lily wrote:
what is the question?…why did he do it?
he’s dead, unavailable for explanation
huckfunn wrote:
Yes, and the guy who did it was a Hispanic, so they couldn’t do the “deranged White guy” routine in the media. Or they had not yet thought up the concept of “White Hispanic” a la George Zimmerman.
The Osprey wrote:
whoops!…oh well, shit happens
@ The Osprey:
What in the world??? They think Jihad Watch is toxic for some reason.
Money? $$$$$$$$
The Osprey wrote:
They did add dingy dingies
heysoos wrote:
You really don’t get it do you? Victim families want to know why ..no matter how deranged the answer their loved one was killed and taken away from them for life.
Just because you don’t want to know the ‘why’ is because you didn’t have a loved one murdered in that slaughter. Until you walk a mile in those shoes you don’t know. So yeah…you are wrong.
@ huckfunn
Yes he is a fraud, but he has Popular Culture, Entertainment and media behind him. This is not an easy task. Whether we like it or not, to too many Americans he is viewed as some light worker. This is a cult of personality.
Obama’s campaign team are ruthless. These guys are not push overs. Don’t underestimate what we are up against. This is a street fight and Obama needs to be destroyed personally.
After defeat of Senate cybersecurity bill, Obama weighs executive-order option
ht drudge
Hmmm, I’ll bet making fun of The One is a cybersecurity threat
Rodan wrote:
I totally agree. Because they scare people. Just wait if he is voted out all the crap that will come out about him and his reign in the White House.
waldensianspirit wrote:
Another EO…who would have thunk it???
////////////////
@ Lily:
Obama can and probably will be beaten. But its going to be a tough fight. Obama and his minions will throw everything at us.
@ Rodan:
@ Lily:
Obama needs to be treated with scorn, just like Carter was going into the election. He’s a small, petty, thin-skinned bully and bullies are always cowards. Piss on ‘im.
@ Lily:
And Van Jones going against Reid and defends Romney!!?!?!?!!!!
Something’s gotten into the water supply
@ Lily:
@ Rodan:
Obama and the dims are whiners and crybabies. Americans don’t like whiners and crybabies.
Rodan wrote:
They certainly play dirty and really criminal in my opinion. So yeah we have to be tough going into this election no matter what.
/I do know this the more pressure on obama the more squirrely he will become and that is a good thing.
huckfunn wrote:
Or wimps! Only the hard-core voting D’s will vote for him and make up excuses for him doing an incrediably horrible job.
The Osprey wrote:
I can’t speak to the Spencer/Geller/Zip contretemp but it makes sense to me that other right wing writers/bloggers stopped focusing on Islam because Obama became the more immediate threat. That’s a priority analysis I can support.
waldensianspirit wrote:
I saw that…it’s nutty out there these days. Reid defends Romney..surely isn’t a good sign for obammer.
@ huckfunn:
What worries me is that Romney is not fighting back effectively. He should have called out Harry Reid as a liar and gotten attack dogs on him.
eaglesoars wrote:
I just took a look at WZ and he is still reporting on Islam. But you are right..we haven’t had any attacks on our soil lately and obammer is certainly more of a threat for us at this moment in time. For some reason it isn’t Jihad Watch it’s Pamela Geller they don’t want to be associated to.
Rodan wrote:
Given time …..so far he is doing better than anyone thought. Plus if I was him I would wait till after the Convention to really hammer obammer…catch him off guard. Right now obammer is spending money right and left. Romney is waiting for the right moment.
Lily wrote:
With some men it’s a Bobby Fischer thing where he said women are stupid and shouldn’t attempt things only men should be doing.
And the VP nod will really have an impact either way
Rodan wrote:
Actually, I’ve been fairly pleased with Romney’s efforts. Yes, he does need to sharpen his tone. However, using the invective of “liar” is not presidential and should be left to the surrogates… and they are already doing it. I expect there will be more.
waldensianspirit wrote:
Until they are actually out-smarted by a woman.
@ Lily:
they cannot know why…the killer is dead…pretty simple, unless he left an explanation in a diary or whatever, and then what good would that do?…sometimes the unknown is all you get, or maybe you get lucky and he just hates sikhs according to his words…then what? is that some sort of closure?
Obama has the race ace and he’ll play it….it’s a big deal, and I would not cut him any slack….Mitt has to go for the jugular, but be nice about it….lol
I don’t want to be the wet blanket, but look what Romney
is up against. The MSM is completely in the tank
for Obama, we are witnessing a quasi-Bolshevik revolution,
only this time Czar Obama is the revolutionary.
The Justice Department will supress the Republican vote
and will not move against vote theft & intimidation
by their shock troops.
Romney can win , but there will have to be a massive
turn out & a swat team of Republican lawyers on the
ground in battleground states.
@ heysoos:
Sorry I disagree. Apparently you don’t know how to do a profile of a person…and a person who does this type of thing…says things to people or writes things about. It is called a forensic psych evalution and yes you get the answers…even if they are crazy. They leave a trail of the type of person they are no matter what you think.
And yes family memembers do want to know why their loved one was killed…no matter how nutty the reason.
@ RIX:
Not a wet blanket at all…obammer will be tough to beat. Hands down.
Lily wrote:
Robert had an argument with the guy who runs Weasel Zippers at a lunch meeting and the guy accused Robert of being responsible for Breivik’s massacre!
I’m sorry, that is full on Johnson in my book.
Lily wrote:
This is the Revolution, flat out.
All of the stops will be pulled out & nobody should
stay home because they think that Romney is not conservative
enough.
If Obama wins I seriously think that it is the tipping
point. Capital & people will book out of here.
@ The Osprey:
Sounds like it.
@ RIX:
I agree totally here. There are still people out there that think things are bad is because of GWBush but obama owns it now.
Lily wrote:
It’s a coup d’etat via vote theft & bribery.
This is uber serious & I really don’t think
that I have been an alarmist in the past.
We need to out vote them by a big margin.
@ Lily:
so how will the forensic evidence effect the survivors?…a lot a of stuff that means little in the long run…why would it help sikhs to hear some words that a guy hated them, or whatever scenario?…it’s done move on…killers kill
heysoos wrote:
At one level, I hear you loud and clear. But on another -- I suspect we are not catching mentally ill people as we could/should. I think that needs to be looked at more thoroughly.
eaglesoars wrote:
Different bait, maybe?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I can’t tell whether you’re being facetious or not.
But. Yes. IF we could predict the bait that attracts them in the first place. With mentally unstable people, how do you do that?
Off to do some reading. Nite all.
We’ve got to beat the Obamessiah outside the margin of theft. Won’t happen in Illinois of course, since there’s at least a 200% margin there.
The Osprey wrote:
Do you even read WeaselZippers? Why would anyone think that Zip is doing the Johnson?