Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan has done something not seen this election. For the first time since 2010, the Tea Party and Base Conservatives are extremely energized. With the selection of Ryan, Romney has sent a big signal. For the first time since Ronald Reagan, the GOP has a Center-Right Fiscal/Economic Conservative ticket.
The Human Events 2011 Conservative of the Year, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), will be announced this morning as Mitt Romney’s vice presidential running mate, according to early reports. Romney will formally announce his choice at a news conference this morning as early as 8:45 a.m.
Reaction from Republicans was swift — and enthusiastic.
“In choosing Paul Ryan, Gov. Romney is signaling he wants to change the course of government, not manage it. This is the start of an aggressive, ideas campaign!”
So said California’s Republican State Chairman Tom Del Beccaro Friday night, shortly after television news reports strongly suggesting that Romney was planning to name House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as his vice presidential running mate Saturday morning. Del Beccaro was hosting a private party of fellow California GOP leaders in his suite at the Burbank Marriott here during the state Republican convention. To a person, the other party activists were genuinely excited about the 42-year-old Ryan’s selection, and all echoed their chairman’s confidence that this was a first step in what would be a campaign grounded in conservative ideas and change.
“I’m as grassroots as you can get and I’m thrilled about Ryan!” Alameda County GOP Vice Chairman Hugh Busell told Human Events, “He had the courage to say why we needed to eventually change the nature of entitlements such as Medicare, and he could explain it.”
Mitt Romney has turned his back on the Rockefeller/Bush Wing of the Republican party and has embraced the Goldwater/Reagan/Tea Party/Economic Conservative wing of the Republican party. Welcome aboard Mitt to the side of the GOP that knows how to defeat the Progressives. Make no mistake, the selection of Paul Ryan is a victory for the Tea Party over the Establishment.
Compassionate Conservatism is dead and good riddance to that Progressive ideology.
Tags: Economic Conservatism, Paul Ryan, Tea Party
actually I would prefer a Ryan/Romney ticket but it is what it is.
I was afraid that Romney’s veep selection would be weak tea. But Ryan appears to be well steeped in fiscal conservatism.
@ brookly red:
Me too. But at least if we win it, it’s buying time until we can really get our house in order. Can’t wait for the Ryan/Biden debates. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
Urban Infidel wrote:
I don’t think there are going to be any… letting Biden debate would be like letting Barney Franks box.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Bloodbath isn’t even the half of it, on this you can count, the Biden/Ryan debates will leave Biden looking like he’s sing the “Villages” all over again while Barack Hussein Obama get’s mauled in the crossfire.
brookly red wrote:
Who was it during the Primaries that when his opponent refused to debate him debated a cardboard cutout? Ryan should do that if they refuse to allow Biden to debate him.
I think after the Ryan nomination the team Obarky are getting nervous. Ryan is a real opponent, someone armed with the facts.
The Photos That Now Keep Obama – Biden Up At Night…
Same effect as ’08. The base is energized like mad over the VP selection. The top name on the ticket both cycles was perceived to be moderate. The VP slot was clearly further right. Hmmm…you might think that would catch somebody’s attention.
Yup, he did go Tea party with this pick.
Now have Palin speak to balance the “moderates”
that are schedueled.
Get all hands on deck & take it to Obama.
Urban Infidel wrote:
I, for one, would gladly pay to see Ryan annihilate Biden!
doriangrey wrote:
Or, they would set up a TV to constantly play Biden singing “The Villages”!
doriangrey wrote:
It was Dan Liljenquist on Orrin Hatch.
Paul Ryan on Israel
Macker wrote:
ROTFLMAS… Yup, that would work even better…
@ Macker:
Biden will be the opponent that shows up, but
he is not the enemy. That gutteral smear mechant Obama is the enemy.
It doen’t matter what the question is, Ryan should
make it a crtique on Obamas failures.
Macker wrote:
Another thing I like about Ryan, he’s not squishy on the Global Warming Hoax ™ . He gave a big time smackdown to Cap & Tax.
Romney has only begun to take the fight to obama. With Ryan as his pick for VP … and this isn’t 2008 redo… I do believe it was Romney who slammed McCain for how Palin was treated.
Lily wrote:
I hope it was Romney who slammed McCain for going too soft on Obama.
This is what they are going to try and attack Romney and Ryan with while obama is already gutting mediacare….
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/12/dnc-chief-wasserman-schultz-attacks-paul-ryan-using-politifacts-2011-lie-of-the-year-claims-he-wants-to-end-medicare-as-we-know-it/
The GWH ™ is one of the biggest threats to our economy and our freedom. Here’s more Ryan on the subject:
Misplaced Priorities
@ Lily:
Think about it this way: Romney and Ryan would end Medicare as the Demo☭rats have come to know it!
@ Urban Infidel:
I don’t know on McCain going soft on obama. But I remember him slamming McCain for how Palin was treated.
I think Romney and Ryan know what they are up against. They will be called racists, wanting to kill elderly people and completely destroy the United States..Projection much obama campaign??
What does obama have to say about Romney’s VP pick ?
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/11/obama-ignores-questions-on-ryan-vp-pick/
Am I the only one not celebrating this? I think Ryan was FAR better in his position in the House. Do you guys trust Boehner in the house without a Ryan in the Budget/Ways Means committee? Romney was supposed to be ‘an economic guru’ -- why select someone else of the same expertise instead of ’rounding out’ the platform.
Whether we like to admit it or not, Romney had our votes just b/c Obama (well, don’t need to go on there). Ryan is NOT going to put anything new in place, and would probably scare the hell out of the ignorant electorate once they hear him. They should’ve been scared all along, but ignorance is bliss for them. Dems will run on ‘Happy Times’ and Romney will lose by a sliver.
I think this was a losing move for Romney and all of us. (since either ryan gets pulled out of office, or we get Obama again -- ich).
Another Tea Party victory.
We dodged a bullet.
Why Christie not picked as Mitt’s VP
@ legacyweapon:
No, he was sold as a Moderate/Liberal who win win disaffected Democrats. Romney was NOT liked by Economic/Fiscal Conservatives.
Paul Ryan can keep his House seat under Wisconsin law. SO if god forbid they lose, he will still be in the House. Should they win, his buddy Eric Cantor is still there, so Boehner will be held in check.
Yes, he energizes the Tea party, Economic Conservatives and can appeal to younger voters.
@ legacyweapon:
Pardon me for this but I respectfully disagree with your comment.
I think Ryan is an excellent pick for VP. I think there will be people that no matter what Romney does he isn’t going to do it the way they want. This constant complaining about Romney isn’t going to help get him elected either.
@ Lily:
This is an awesome VP pick.
@ Rodan:
Yes it is Rodan and remember I told you not to give up hope!
Don’t get down, Romney is going to have to do this election different because obama is certainly a different poltical animal and will throw everything he has at Romney. I told you Romney will do better than we would have thought.
I look at it this way obama is playing *checkers* and Romney is going to have play *chess*.
/oh and obama doesn’t play checkers too well either.
@ Lily:
Check out DOD. Charles takes a swipe at Paul Ryan for being Catholic.
And the attacks are already coming…
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/12/obama-shamelessly-lies-claims-romney-ryan-will-raise-your-taxes/
Rodan wrote:
Naturally he would …he hates Catholic’s to the bone.
Well, I don’t know if the selection of Ryan has energized the base, but it has certainly energized you, Rodan. Not that long ago, you were decidedly luke-warm about Romney, eh?
I’m not trying to be snarky, just making an observation here. For the record, I’m glad that the Ryan pick has cheered you up.
And legacyweapon? I’ve never seen that nic before. Can you say “concern troll”?
@ Rodan:
Oh good grief!!! I’m a tradional Catholic I don’t think I’m persceuting anyone. Good gried he really is reaching.
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
I know my oldest son was very happy with the pick as was I. Excellent pick in my opinion.
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
He hasn’t backed up his views just dropped a bomb comment and left.
Lily wrote:
That’s not what I heard…
Many threads cried out from the graves that you persecuted them to DEATH… 
doriangrey wrote:
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
Ryan has energized me. he’s an economic/fiscal Conservative. he comes from the Goldwater/Reagan wing of the GOP. I am glad the Republican party has decided to end the Bush error (88-08) and embrace Reaganism again.
@ Lily:
But Islam is awesome!
Lily wrote:
ROTFLMAO… With apologies, but you walked right into that one Lily dear…
http://hkdp.deviantart.com/art/Who-Voted-For-This-Idiot-248439094
Here is what we are against.
I also think that Ryan might draw some of the Paulbots that are actually concerned about the economy and not just being obsessed asses.
@ Mars:
The Paulians love Paul Ryan. He’s an admirer of Ayn Rand.
Rodan wrote:
Hmmm, can we combine that Islamic awesomeness with Obama’s NASA Islamic Outreach Program and give the Muslim their very own colony on Venus?
Rodan wrote:
He has become nuttier than a fruit cake to honest.
@ doriangrey:
How about we ship Islam out of this galaxy.
@ doriangrey:
Oh yeah I did. Big Time!
@ Lily:
He’s had a nervous breakdown.
@ Mars:
Good one…he has disgraced the Oval Office completely.
Rodan wrote:
He’s had something and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a nervous breakdown. A man his age twittering away and just basically destroyed his own blog..and got no love for it either.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/12/liberal-group-to-run-new-ad-depicting-paul-ryan-throwing-elderly-woman-off-a-cliff/
@ legacyweapon:
Per Wisconsin law Ryan can still/run keep his House seat while campaigning as vp. I’m sure he’s actively engaged in finding a suitable replacement to run in his place that would be in the same mold as himself.
Wan’t a Romney fan but he’s our candidate now and i will support him 100%. However his picking Ryan has relived me greatly as far as any doubt or reservations I’ve had about him in the past.
My one big problem with him is of course Romney care, the very program Obamacare is modeled after. I’ve thought that will be the albatross around his neck when it’s brought up during the debates. My other problem is with this, stop saying what works in Mass. doesn’t necessarily work in the other 50 states. It doesn’t work in Mass. either and is billions in the red.
Don’t go down that road, say it was a bad decision you’ve learned from it and have moved along.
Rodan wrote:
<—-- hint hint… Surface temperature on Venus (which interestingly enough is their God Allah, and the star so often seen with their Crescent) is 930 Degrees Fahrenheit…
Rodan wrote:
I don’t even see him in my Twitter timeline anymore and I have close to 500 followers. I wouldn’t even know he or his blog even exists if it weren’t for checking into DoD once or twice a week.
@ Urban Infidel:
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you, The Vice President of The United States of America, Joe Biden.
@ Flyovercountry:
Yep that is our Village Idiot ….for all the world to see.
@ Flyovercountry:
Paul Ryan will eat him alive in a debate. Hands down.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Heh heh heh, I have Macker working on a Video that shows 10 seconds of that video with 25 seconds of Paul Ryan schooling Obama on Obamacare, then back to Biden, then back to Ryan then back to Biden than back you Ryan with a text overlay.. Which one of these men would you feel safer being one step away for being President of the United States of America…
@ doriangrey:
Good one. I am anxious to see it. Have him title it our Village Idiot.
The village idiot and the slacker king. What a freaking pair.
@ doriangrey:
Paul Ryan of course and thank God Pelosi isn’t third in succession anymore.
@ doriangrey:
How about we throw some “hemp” into the mix!
@ Flyovercountry:
How does it feel to finally have an Economic/Fiscal Conservative on the GOP ticket? No more Compassionate Conservatism or Kinder Gentler nation crap. The Bush Error of the GOP is over!
It’s been a nightmare the last 24 years.
Rodan wrote:
They do? He is? Did not know that.
Rodan wrote:
I thought that was the choom wagon
Rodan wrote:
Well obviously, how else are we going to get them to keep up with the Rocket going to Venus if we don’t tie some Stout Hemp Rope around their necks and daisy chain them together and tie the Stout Hemp Rope to the Rocket????
@ Flyovercountry:
I know! Today is the first time I’ve seen that video of Biden and it’s un-friggin’-believable!
Urban Infidel wrote:
The Village idiot singing “The Villages”. Talk about irony.
John Difool wrote:
Somewhere “The Villages” are missing their Idiot…
legacyweapon wrote:
i believe in promoting talent, not leaving it in place becasue it is the safe thing to do. someone will just have to step up and take ryan’s place in the house.
@ doriangrey:
Heh. Touching upon an indelicate subject, there is often talk made about the VP candidate being chosen as “assassination insurance” for the President. Kind of ignores the fact that nearly all Presidential assassins and wanna-bes for the past 2 centuries have come from the Left of the spectrum, excluding the few who were just plain nuts.
But Ryan as VP will certainly provide some deterrence for a murderous Leftist who might contemplate an assault upon Mr. Romney.
@ coldwarrior:
didn’t I see somewhere that his term as committee chair was about to expire anyway?
hmmmm
don’t think this is good news
Muslim Brotherhood member President Mohamed Morsi has sacked the senior Egyptian military command, the primary secular counterweight to Islamist fundamentalist control of Egypt.
http://legalinsurrection.com/
rain of lead wrote:
dunno ’bout that.
Now this is interesting, especially this part:
I’m sure this has already been discussed but worth a repost: Saudi Arabia to Build Women-Only City.
@ Urban Infidel:
Yeah I saw that…beyond words.
@ rain of lead:
A dog & pony show, smoke & mirrors. Morsi sacked them and then made them all presidential cabinet members/advisers. Guess it’s the old saying ” keep your friends close but your enemies closer” except thats not exactly right in this case, this was just showmanship attempting to fool the public he’s in control when this was most likely the military’s idea and they got to pick their own successors.
At any rate Morsi knows who runs the country and it’s the military. This was nothing but theater.
@ rain of lead:
C’mon say it with me, folks “military coup”. That’s good, I knew you could.
If there aren’t tanks surrounding the Presidential Palace within 24 hours, color me surprised.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
See my above. Morsi just playing the game and this was nothing but public relations, a facade.
@ John Difool:
I get you. Smoke and mirrors.
Lily wrote:
I wonder what took them so long. Thought it could be a relief for the women, so they can leave their houses, drive and wear what they want. But something tells me that even in their women-only ghetto, they’d still have no freedom.
@ Urban Infidel:
We should have a city-naming contest!
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
Don’t…tempt…me….
Urban Infidel wrote:
In the comments section of the article
What in the world?
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
If you read the Breitbart article you’ll notice the officers he sacked convienently got cabinet posts afterward. Probably to better keep a watchful eye on him and no doubt the sacked officers picked their own replacements.
ADMINS: Please check your e-mail in about 10 minutes…I’m uploading the video to you!
Urban Infidel wrote:
Yeah I don’t think this woman only *ghetto* (and that is excatly what it is and excellent wording on your part UI) is going to make it anymore easier for the women. They really do hate women …yet the world says … *crickets*.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Dameascus
Haghdad
Baberuit
Calo wrote:
Will only encourage feminist lesbianism? Whoa now that is out there. Really out there.
Urban Infidel wrote:
You wouldn’t think Saudi Arabia could get more Fellini-esque, but with the plans for their own City of Women, they’ve proved it possible.
Calo wrote:
Actually, being married to muslim men probably encourages feminist lesbianism way more than a woman only city ever could.
@ John Difool:
Nodickabad.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Catfightmandu
@ John Difool:
Actually I think it would drive them more towards chasity to be honest.
John Difool wrote:
Lesbanon
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Dar al *….* fill in the blank Arabic word for ‘castration’.
@ Rodan:
Ryan is a great pick. I’ve been waiting since Reagan for an economically literate politician to emerge anywhere near any ticket. Now we not only have somebody to fill that role, but a guy who is able to articulate it clearly. The Dims have been gleefully frittering about proclaiming that this is what they’ve wanted all along. All I can say is I’m glad to see that this pick has made everyone happy.
4 years ago, Obama ran a campaign promising to be a tax reforming hawk, and now that vision is impossible for him to maintain. So far this year, he has been running on a vision of being a full blown Socialist in the bold tradition of the murkiest nightmares of the Frankfort School, and Romney has been campaigning as the heir apparent to Reagan. Ryan serves to cement that choice for Americans, and while I am not guaranteeing the victory, I can guarantee that at the very least, we are about to have the fight that we’ve been avoiding as a nation for the past 20 years. Banzai!
@ Urban Infidel:
Burqaville?
Urban Infidel wrote:
LMFAO !
@ doriangrey:
I can not wait to see that video! Even sober, Biden is truly no intellectual giant. He was that special child in the back of every class eating paste, in other words, a future Senator from the Democrat Party.
@ Flyovercountry:
Like I have been saying … I thought Romney would actually surprise us…and he is doing just that with Ryan as the VP pick. It is just about time to start to rumble.
@ Flyovercountry:
Oh I can never forget his …. “It’s about a three letter word
J-O-B-S.”
Urban Infidel wrote:
Since Christie seems fairly pro-Muslim, maybe he can help them build their own Maddowlands arena.
Flyovercountry wrote:
I’m going to guess that that is what Macker is talking about here. 90
I assume Saudi Arabia wants to build a women-only city because these are women that not even a muslim man would f**k. If so they should call it…
Mos Ugly
@ buzzsawmonkey:
MadCowistan?
@ doriangrey:
@ Flyovercountry:
Not quite back and forth, but you’ll get the point!
@ John Difool:
It’s a fucking shithole…fucking shithole….
Macker wrote:
Yup… I saw it, maybe get rid of Odumbo giving Ryan the finger, but otherwise cool…
@ Macker:
“You will never find a more wretched hive of fugliness and bitchiness in the universe. We must be cautious.”
estrogenistahn
@ doriangrey:
Actually, I think that should stay. It just goes to show the utter contempt Обама has for The American People.
coldwarrior wrote:
St. Penislessburg
@ Flyovercountry:
Perot tried, but that allowed Billy Boy to sneak in.
John Difool wrote:
the mayor could be called ‘your penislessness’
@ Flyovercountry:
the choices are very defined and very different and very very clear
See? I just knew we could come up with any number of respectful and sensitive names for the place////
Rodan wrote:
That worthless fatass POS now hates Christians and Jews, but loves the muzz swine.
I hate that motherfucker…He’s such a phony asshole.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
I disagree. I think he’s a genuine asshole. And a phony.
@ coldwarrior:
Or, “You’re on her”.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
ahhhhh!
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Most of the liberal asswipes that vote for Obama in the northeast are Catholic. I say more power to lardass.
@ John Difool:
I don’t know if obama will have those Catholic’s this time around. Sure there will be some but not all by a long shot.
Just saw a Tweet that said attendance in Waukeshia at double-R event is 15,000 +
BTW, don’t know if anyone mentioned this, but unfortunately there’s only one veep debate. It will be at Centre College ib Danville, KY, on Oct. 11, 2012.
Gov. Romney and the Marxist will have three.
And Romney and Ryan will be interviewed together on “60 Minutes” tonight. Let’s see if whomever interviews them is decent, fair, and will try to hide their contempt.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Excellent point! My bad.
Catholics will vote for Romney/Ryan. Buttholicks will vote for Obama/Biden.
@ John Difool:
Also not all Catholic’s vote democrat..yeah some do…but this time around he will not have a large Catholic voting block.
Lily wrote:
The majority of them he will. Not so much a religion thing but most folks in New England are perpetually stuck-on-stupid.
@ John Difool:
I don’t know obama has made it very clear how he dislikes Catholic’s.
John Difool wrote:
I’d bet that the vast majority of Catholics who regularly attend Mass will vote for Romney/Ryan. I think Romney picked Ryan to get the Irish vote.
Lily wrote:
And Jews, He hates them too.
@ coldwarrior:
@ John Difool:
RFZ -- Rape Free Zone
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Yep he hates them too.
Lily wrote:
He dislikes Jews too but I’ll bet a majority of them will still vote for him again.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Obummer is a god hater and a narcissist. He covets total power.
@ Lily:
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
I honestly hope you guys are right. If so, well Obama can kiss California goodbye. Because without 80 percent of the Catholics here, he will never get a majority.
Urban Infidel wrote:
If we ever have to occupy that city during the synchronized menstruation cycle of millions of pissed off women it should be called “The Red Zone”
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
Except for those Father Flager type of liberation theology Catholics.
@ John Difool:
There is some erosion going on with the Jews and Catholic’s concerning voting for obama/biden. Sure your hard-core never can vote R ones will vote for obama. But he has also lost a lot of votes from those two voting blocks. I’m not going to tell you there isn’t the hardcore voting D Catholic’s or Jews aren’t going to vote for him.
John Difool wrote:
That’s funny because it’s proven that women in close quarters gradually their cycles start to sync up, so what you’ll have is literally millions of women all PMS’ing at the same time. LOL!!
Urban Infidel wrote:
Pfather Pflager is a pflaming asshole.
doriangrey wrote:
I am going out on a limb here..but there will be some Catholic’s who still vote for obama no matter what. Why? Hell if I know…it really has nothing to do with religion..mainly they are hard-core democrat voters who would rather die than vote Republican. Trust me there some of those in my family. Apparently they aren’t listening in Mass.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Wow, what a scary thought. I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit.
It’s the only way to be sure.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Hags in the bag, all on the rag?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Don’t lean on me man ’cause I can’t afford the ticket, back in Suffrabitch Citay
@ Urban Infidel:
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Agreed.
@ John Difool:
Hold the nukes for now, because the fallout from millions of PMS’ing Arab women finally releasing generations of rage could prove to be the middle eastern conflagration of the final tipping point, where Islam has no choice but to destroy itself.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
That would make me gag.
Good pick for Veep. Too bad Romney is the other pick. Oh well, still looks like a winner.
Awww, this makes me sooooo sad I just might cry…Nah.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
I really hope they have lots of air-conditioning and running water in that city because millions of women on the rag at the same time is liable to…..
I think you guys know where I’m about to go with this, so I’ll just spare you the mental picture.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
I hope it’s because they raised their daughter.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
LOL! Actually, raising your kid to be a lib should be classified as child abuse, if you axe me.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
That put a warm bubbly feeling in my heart
Calo wrote:
(Radical) feminist lesbians destroyed the women movement during the 1970′s in the West. Thanks to them words like “emancipation” are no longer usable and the women movement has become a bad joke.
John Difool wrote:
Too bad they can’t put Blabbermouth-Shultz in jail for continuing stupity.
Guggi wrote:
I detest femi-nazis. But it’s like Rush Limbaugh says, the “women’s movement” was started to make ugly women acceptable.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
We already know she’s inept as DNC chair and a useful idiot for our side but what does it say as a Congresswoman when you’re that politically connected to The Whitehouse and you still can’t keep your own parents out of jail.
I’ll bet her parents wish they had a daughter that lived.
Bob in Breckenridge wrote:
and what makes fugly men like Rush Limbaugh acceptable ?
Guggi wrote:
large wallets.
large wallets makes even the ugliest guy very attractive to many many women
Guggi wrote:
Millions of dollars. Next question.
@ coldwarrior:
@ John Difool:
LOL!!! Eggs-zactly! :0
Guggi wrote:
What makes guys like 83 year old liberal George Soros acceptable to young women more than half their age?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48636830/ns/business-us_business/t/billionaire-george-soros-marrying-rd-time/?ocid=ansmsnbc11#.UCgvYKN0h1g
When it comes to large bank accounts I’m pretty sure it doesn’t matter what political or religious affiliation you are, women will be on you like peanut butter on jelly.
@ coldwarrior:
@ John Difool:
ok, so they rely on prostitutes. If I were Limbaugh I wouldn’t open my trap about the uglyness of some women.
Guggi wrote:
But you’re not Limbaugh, you don’t get paid millions of dollars to talk. Next question.
John Difool wrote:
Yep. Remember when Anna Nicole Smith married that 94 yr old guy who was a multi-millionaire worth like $600 million? I’m certain she didn’t marry him ’cause he was good in the sack.
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
I believe what Guggi is saying is Limbaugh is not allowed to comment on the state of feminazism in this country because he’s not a Calvin Klein underwear model and has millions of dollars even though his wife worked for the NFL and comes from a rich family and had lots of money of her own.
John Difool wrote:
I understand: if you’re male, prominent and rich AND fugly you can call every woman everything you want. Is this a conservative or only a stupid opinion ?
@ Guggi:
an opinion, exactly just that, an opinion.
he gets paid big money for his opinions. and frankly what he has said about the ‘feminazis’ is right on.
Guggi wrote:
You’re mad that no multimillionaire would marry you huh…
Guggi wrote:
If you’re a rich liberal man/woman you can call a woman everything you want too, even have murder & rape fantasies about them & their children and as long as you’re a liberal you can get away with it so spare me your moral equivalency bullshit.
@ coldwarrior:
Feminism has gotten very tedious.
Not all women, but a lot of the Feminists
aren’t really after equality, they want preference.
When is the last time that you heard one of those
androginous types scremaing to break the glass
ceiling to be a lathe operator?
John Difool wrote:
red herring
@ Bob in Breckenridge:
I love it when they pan the crowd at the Super Bowl &
you see all of those old guys with their super hot
daughters/
RIX wrote:
No longer necessary, there work actually quite a few (at least in Germany) in these jobs. Women are no longer restricted to certain jobs.
@ Guggi:
That may be true in Germany, but it plays out differently
here.
The activist feminists have always demanded white color
jobs and to be on a fast track for no real meritorious
reason.
On the other hand, I have worked with lots of competent
women & invariably they are not man haters with a grudge.
@ Guggi:
Women aren’t restricted from working any job anymore (except sperm donor type of paying gigs).
Feminism is an needless movement at this point. I hear none of the females I speak with laboring under the notion that we need to bring back that particular movement.
The FemiNazis Rush ridicules are rightfully ridiculed.
Romney/Ryan live speacjifying in Wisconsin…
@ Calo:
You refer to feminism, I refer to women’s movement. Different concepts, different goals.
Guggi wrote:
I agree.
brookly red wrote:
Moi aussi.
@ Speranza:
Please explain.
I always view the two to be equivalent.
Calo wrote:
Feminism is identity, women’s movement is civil rights.
Guggi wrote:
Not a red herring when you brought it up and basically said it was exclusive to a conservative opinion thought process.
@ Guggi:
Feminism blames men for their suppression in society and thus forms its identity based on that false assumption.
The Women’s Movement is about gaining civil rights for women from men.
What rights am I missing that men don’t have and which men are suppressing me in society?
I seem to be a well adjusted female who has my own business that can support my family.
@ John Difool:
And you keep quiet about me being well adjusted Mr DiFool!
@ coldwarrior:
This is very true. No money ? No woman.
And now for the news ABC News wants you to know. Will Paul Ryan Release His Tax Returns?
Calo wrote:
Give me some credit. At least I stuck to misogyny and never once brought up how a yuropoor from a third world socialist country has no business commenting on superior American affairs. You see, I stuck to misogyny and never once mixed jingoism/nationalism into the convo…..and for that I should be rewarded.
Baby steps.
@ Urban Infidel:
I just watched the R/R interview with Bob Schieffer on 60 minutes. About what I expected. Schieffer was the loyal Obama foot soldier, getting in all the talking points about Bane, fairness and tax returns. He forgot to ask anything about the Regime’s policy failures, corruption and cronyism. R/R did just fine. Straight forward, honest, “we’re in this for the country”. Schieffer’s line of questioning reminded me of why I haven’t watched 60 Minutes in over a decade.
@ John Difool:
Don’t misunderstand me.
I actually enjoy Guggi and her insight on American politics.
And, her shoe collection is to die for.
I like Paul Ryan and am pleased with Romney for choosing him. And I’m especially looking forward to seeing Romney pick John Bolton for Secretary of State. Also, I just bought two Romney/Ryan bumper stickers!
John Difool wrote:
1. I didn’t claim that this was an exclusive con servative opinion but asked you if this was either an conservative OR stupid opinion.
2. If your neighbor beats his wife is this an excuse for you to beat your wife also ?
BlogTalkRadio time.
See you in chat.
New thread! — Blogmocracy LIVE at Blogtalkradio!
Calo wrote:
I enjoy her too, especially when she’s bashing conservatives and our military in her passive/aggressive way and making it appear like she’s just asking questions.
@ Calo:
Female employees get still less paid than male employees (77 ct. vs 100 ct.)
Stuck at the airport. CNN playing some story about evil racist Tennesseans trying to stop a mosque.
Good night @all (it’s 2:00 am)
@ John Difool:
That’s where you are wrong.
Guggi actually likes Americans and our culture.
But, she can speak for herself at this point.
Guggi wrote:
Is this a conservative or only a stupid opinion ?
Passive aggressive line of questioning. You didn’t say “is this a conservative or liberal opinion”.
Newsflash: It’s neither a conservative nor liberal opinion it’s just fact. Women will flock to a man who wields power or money no matter their political or religious affiliation or the ones they’re pursuing.
Calo wrote:
Ask Princess Natasha about that and get back to me.
Romney ‘applauds’, doesn’t ‘embrace’ Ryan plan
@ My 2 Cents:
Bolton would be a great pic for Sec of State.
Prawn Roll for Sec of Treasury OR to head up the Federal Reserve
Herman Cain at Commerce
Other suggestions?
mfhorn wrote:
2008 Redux
mfhorn wrote:
Gen. Petreus Sec. of Defense
Sherrif Joe Arpaio head of DoJ
@ John Difool:
Hey, I like those!
I’d kinda like to see someone like Col West in a powerful position, too. And in a few years, NM Gov. Susanna Martinez.
@ legacyweapon:
I agree with you, here. Who will carry the “football” now that Ryan is the VP ? VPs, unless they are Dick Cheney, historically have been politically powerless.