First time visitor? Learn more.

OBAMA ADMIN SENT UNARMED BRITISH FIRM TO PROTECT U.S. MISSION IN BENGHAZI

by huckfunn ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Africa, Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, CAIR, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Elections 2012, government, Hillary Clinton, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Koran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Correctness, Politics, September 11, Sharia (Islamic Law), Socialism, Special Report, Terrorism at September 18th, 2012 - 10:13 pm

The Obama regime version of the sacking of our consulate in Benghazi, and the murder of 4 U.S. citizens, is unraveling hour-by hour. Breitbart News reports that the State Department’s official policy for the Libyan diplomatic mission was intended to be “low profile” and the rules of engagement (ROE) for the Benghazi consulate was “no bullets”. Let that sink in for a moment. NO BULLETS! How does one engage any attack or any threat with no bullets? But that was the ROE order signed by SOS Hilary Clinton. The State Department hired British security company, Blue Mountain, as they agreed to provide security based upon the “no bullets” ROE and at least 5 of the security team were Libyan nationals. As I’ve said before, this entire affair is a direct result of incompetence and dereliction of duty at the highest levels of the White House, Secretary of State and Defense Department.

According to a source close to Breitbart News and high up in the intelligence community, the Obama administration’s policy following Muammar Gadafi’s death has been to keep a “low profile” during a chaotic time.

For this reason, according to the source, American Marines were not stationed at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli or the American mission in Benghazi, as would typically have been the case. In the spirit of a “low profile,” the administration didn’t even want an American company in charge of private security. Blue Mountain, the British firm the State Department hired, was willing to abide by the “no bullets” Rules of Engagement (ROE), so were a logical fit for the contract. These sub-standard protections for American diplomats were signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the ROE.

In essence, the Obama Administration tasked an unarmed British firm with security responsibilities that should have been handled by armed American servicemen, and it was all approved by the Secretary of State. Needless to say, the plan failed and an Ambassador was murdered, along with several others.

As of now, the State Department has not disclosed the full State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.

Read the whole article here. 

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

4 Responses to “OBAMA ADMIN SENT UNARMED BRITISH FIRM TO PROTECT U.S. MISSION IN BENGHAZI”
( jump to bottom )

  1. lobo91
    1 | September 18, 2012 10:50 pm

    Sounds like the “security” we had at our housing complex in Kuwait.

    One of the reasons I’m not there anymore…


  2. 2 | September 18, 2012 10:55 pm

    How does one engage any attack or any threat with no bullets?

    Harsh language?


  3. lobo91
    3 | September 18, 2012 10:58 pm

    mfhorn wrote:

    How does one engage any attack or any threat with no bullets?

    Harsh language?

    The plan in Kuwait was to call the local police.

    Most of whom are also unarmed, BTW…


  4. 4 | October 1, 2012 12:49 am

    Can we just do the bastards for treason and be done with it?


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David