Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
The Diary of Daedalus
website design was Built By David
I think it’s even worse than that — the media has become an “Enemy Of The American People” Our media is a tool of “organized governmental power”. If you haven’t seen Pat Caddell’s powerful speech from a month ago, it’s well worth your time:
You don’t need to be psychic to make this prediction: After Romney wins next week (God willing!), the media will stop covering up news stories unfavorable to our corrupt regime — and to start making up false news stories for the next eight years to bring down the Romney/Ryan administration.
@ Fritz Katz:
When Romney is elected, the media will immediately discover that the economy is awful, and even if Romney gets unemployment down in the 5% range and growth up to 4% the economy will still be awful. Rodan is right, we don’t have a free press. They aren’t journalists anymore. They are Democrat operatives with by-lines.
Woods thought help was coming…he died because of it…..he painted a target with his laser for a plane that never came….Obama is a ZERO.
@ Storagemanager:
If the reports are right, the plane was there. It just wasn’t allowed to fire. Whomever gave that order comited voluntary manslaughter.
This story needs to stay hot….the dead can not rest without the TRUTH.
@ Storagemanager:
I agree. This should be the story of the election. If it were President McCain who has done this, it would be the story oof the election. The press has never been more in th ebag for a President ever. Only Fox News is giving this story anything like the coverage that it deserves. Of course, Fox has the most viewership, so the story is getting out.
Obama leaves nobody behind.
He just turns them into speed bumps.
@ Iron Fist:
Drudge and Beck also…
I still say…when Woods found Stevens was gone…someone in the Whitehouse said oh shit….we need an excuse for Stevens being dead….lets blame the video.
@ Storagemanager:
I’m glad I don’t Facebook much. A little with my sister is about it, and even there not much. I’ve seen it put this way: Take a picture of two pigs in a pen, eating from a trough. One pig says “Boy, the food sure is good!” The caption: if you aren’t paying for it, you’re the product. That’s Facebook.
Obama is the worst President in American history….Carter was better.
Democrat leader U.S. Senate member John F. Kerry advised there would have been an easy way to deal with this. Just cut a treason deal behind the American Peoples back like he helped do pror with the NVA/VC in Paris France.
@ Iron Fist:
Right now they’re the White House Stenographic Pool. That will change in January 2013, when they will tell us about their sacred duty to “speak truth to power” once more.
Obama means what he says “he leaves nobody behind” If you are somebody to his racial radical consciousness he will help out, else you are a nobody to him. Obama counts the tea party, the police, handicapped kids, and his grandmother as nobodies.
@ darkwords:
And veterans.
Storagemanager wrote:
CIA hosts training by Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas supporter.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/cia-hosts-training-by-muslim-brotherhood-leader-and-hamas-supporter.html
Carolina Girl wrote:
That is a sadly accurate expectation. These people are transparent except to the willfully blind. PRAVDA R US
http://www.punditandpundette.com/2012/10/we-leave-nobody-behind.html
Storagemanager wrote:
At the last moment how did they even know about the video? That video was on the internet for months and all of a sudden on 9/11 of this year outrage broke out. Naw something more nefarious was going on.
If the rumors concerning his sexuality are true, he may have actually said “we leave nobody’s behind.”
Here’s my question: Was it wise to depend on a Libyan militia that clearly wasn’t up to the job?
Isn’t there a more fundamental problem here, namely that a Libyan militia is Muslim?
Uhhhh, i , uhhhhhh killed unnnn OBL, uhhhhh and FOUR AMERICAN heroes!
@ randian:
Only if you believe they’re all the same and on the same side.
@ Moe Katz:
They are not all the same and on the same side, but stereotypes are difficult to avoid while observing from across the pond.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/9515684/US-suspends-Afghan-militia-training-after-attacks-on-Nato-forces.html
Moe Katz wrote:
That is the baseline a lot of Folks start from since 9-11-01.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Yes, stupid, aren’t they?
@ Moe Katz:
Sorry to intrude, but 9/11 was the first introduction to Islam for most Americans. And, it left a bitter taste in our psyche.
@ Calo:
This is going to leave a bitter taste in your psyche and mine, I’m going to do my stationary bike before my inner troll comes out any further.
@ Moe Katz:
Good night Moe.
I always enjoy your company, even if we disagree.
*frantically checking my grammar and punctuation*
G’night Calo — and don’t worry, I don’t correct anybody for free.
Moe Katz
Yes, stupid, aren’t they?
I know we’re so stupid. Evidence that Muslims bat for team Islam first, last, and always is the product of our paranoid imagination. Protecting an infidel against other Muslims? That could be construed as befriending an infidel in preference to the believers, an act of apostasy punishable by death under Islamic law. What Muslim obeys Islam in preference to infidel paymasters? Nah, I am surely delusional.
@ randian:
I’m leaving now and won’t see the reply till tomorrow morning. Y’all’s response to 9-11 reminds me of some punch-drunk palooka with a room temperature IQ that took one on the proboscis and got blinded, and so is charging around the ring swinging at air.
I know I’m out of the consensus here on that question, and I’m outta here for the night.
@ Moe Katz:
My private opinion on politics is usually kept quiet and is not aired on a blog.
But, you are pushing me tonight, Moe. Despite your call for sleep.
Most Americans before 911 were oblivious to Islam.
However, thank you for reminding us as to why we are just elephants in a room charging our drunk, dead trunks about after 911. We are a forgiving country, but we won;t forget.
911 taught us who the enemy was. And, Islam keeps reminding us every day that we are not welcome in their worldview.
Just an average American with an opinion, and a vote.
@ Moe Katz:
My response to 9/11? Pre 9/11 I had an ok view of islam. had visited several Islamic countries and didn’t find anything really disturbing. Just a lot of third world superstition and ignorance mixed in with a few educated rich people. I had thought of studying sufism. Post 9/11 i watched the islamic folly. I’ve met plenty of nice muslims since then. But I don’t think they control their own future. They come fundamentally from violence and hate. That is the face of islam. Christianity is fundamentally about love. Big difference. I would say i am more knowledgeable about sharia and suras now. I am also more consciousness that islam is something that should be stopped in its tracks and force-ably evolved. Like post war Japan.
@ Calo:
I’m sorry.
@ darkwords:
I do wish, just as fervently as you, that we could just magically change their culture but we plainly can’t. Genocidal ranting of the sort we hear on this forum on a regular basis may be fun and cathartic for some, but it’s not constructive. Reality sucks, but it’s better than the alternatives.
@ Moe Katz:
Moe, read Andrew McCarthy’s “The Grand Jihad.” Are all Muslims violent? No. But do they agree with the aims of the Islamofacists to conquer the West and impose Shar’ia Law in a global caliphate? Yes.
Carolina Girl wrote:
And the other problem is that the “violent/non-violent” categories are fluid.
There are countless examples of Muslims who grew up in the west, spent their entire lives in a “secular” manner, and then something happened to cause them to become jihadists.
Nidal Hassan is a perfect example.
@ Carolina Girl:
Exactly! They aren’t all terrorists, no, but they nearly all support the broad goals and aims of the terrorists. And the ones that do not are considered “apostates”, which is worse than being an infidel.Islam is no more compatible with civilization than Nazism was. We didn’ thave to kill off all Nazis to win that war (neo-Nazis still exist), but we had to utterly destroy their ability to wage war or to be of any significant import on world matters.
Moe Katz wrote:
Look at the percentage of non-muslim people in Pakistan since partitian as an example of what an islamic takeover does to a country.
islam is murder, 9-11 is nothing compared to the bloodbath islam has created since the 7th century. 9-11 was a wake up call, if you still think islam is all sweet and nice that says something about you, not us.
@ Carolina Girl:
@ lobo91:
@ Iron Fist:
@ Prebanned:
Difficult to debate when you’re outnumbered like this.
I think the Muslim world is evolving and the struggle has only begun. There are Islamofascists and there are liberals, and many in between. Any opinion poll I’ve seen shows that the Taliban are generally disliked and most don’t believe in that caliphate stuff. Tens of thousands of Pakistanis have been killed by Islamist terrorists. I certainly agree that jihadists are a threat, but I believe we need to stay rational, avoid overgeneralizing, and learn to distinguish friends from enemies.
Malala Yousafzai is a 14 year-old girl who stood against the Taliban in the Swat Valley of Pakistan and advocated for girls’ rights to go to school. She is a Muslim too, and she is not alone.
It is easy to find exceptions from both sides of the issue. The challenge is to figure out where the average falls. For now there are a lot of Folks that are willing to error on the side of caution regardless of the facts.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Here’s a fact for ya: Islamists lost the elections in Libya. Liberal secularists hold a plurality.
Moe Katz wrote:
True. But that didn’t help our Ambassador when push came to shove.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
My only point is that these societies are a mixed bag, full of contradictions and fault lines. You need to work with the good guys as well as kick butt with the bad guys. There is no purely military solution, that’s a crock.
Moe Katz wrote:
I agree with that. The trick is finding the right balance between the carrot and the stick. I am one that believes that we must treat our Friends well and should show our Enemies no mercy. I also realize that shorting Friend from Foe is no easy task even under the best conditions.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
And mistakes will be made….
@ Moe Katz:
And the Islamists hold a majority of the guns.
I think that gives them an effective veto.
Moe Katz wrote:
“Bumps in the road.”
lobo91 wrote:
“Might makes right.”
Is still the primary method of gaining and holding power in a lot of places.
@ lobo91:
Lobo, are you sure about that? My understanding is that the forces who committed the Benghazi attacks had been neutralized and at least some other militias disarmed.
In the broader picture, speaking of the Islamic world as a whole, the Islamists have been better armed and prepared in the wake of the Arab Spring because only Muslim organizations were permitted under the existing dictatorships. So they got a head start when the dictatorships were removed. Still, I dare to think we’re only in the first quarter and a touchdown behind.
@ lobo91:
Your irony is understood and I appreciate where you’re coming from. It’s just that I don’t see any alternative.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Sometimes, though, the people can rise up and defeat the bullies, just on the strength of their courage and will alone. Like Malala, or the Iranian girl who punched out the Mullah who was telling her how to dress. I think there’s reason for hope.
@ Moe Katz:
My doctor just got back from France. He was staying in a hotel across the street from a synagogue. That House of Worship had barbed wire around it, lights on all night, and armed guards. Turkish Jews, German Jews, British Jews, French Jews, Israeli Jews….see a pattern. Read Bruce Bawer, a gay writer who was hounded by Muslim harrassment out of Amsterdam and then moved to Norway with his partner. His books are a wake up call and very accessible to read. They are excellent for giving you the sense of the gathering storm in a way that few other writers can. At least check his reviews at amazon.com. There is a large piece here I think you are missing.
@ yenta-fada:
Our little synagogue in Quebec City got firebombed back in the 90′s. You don’t have to tell me about these things.
It’s a mixed picture, Yenta, and it’s in flux. The attacks on synagogues are part of the truth. And the schoolgirls in Pakistan coming out and marching in support of Malala is another part of the truth.
Exclusive: Romney’s heading to Pennsylvania as GOP drops millions on ads
ht drudge.
They say it is going to be a huge turnout
wrong thread
waldensianspirit wrote:
Thanks for dropping by.
Moe Katz wrote:
The LEADERSHIP of the Muslims in Western countries are Islamists. Organizations like CAIR and its Canadian counterpart, ISNA in U.S. and Canada, Muslim Student Associations of both countries, Canadian Arab Foundation, I could go on and on. (and I have, lol) The Imams are trained in the same way in backward Islamist States. The problem for the ‘moderate’ Muslims EVERYWHERE is that their own families, friends, and mosques will turn against them if they say ‘boo’! Look at the death threats made against Tarek Fatah in Toronto for trying to keep a single moderate Muslim group going. This is why totalitarians like Ergogan in Turkey are very accurate in saying “There is no moderate Islam, there is only Islam” In order for Muslims to integrate with democratic societies, they either have to leave their communities/families (which IS possible in a non-Muslim country), or stay silent while their leaders speak for them. I don’t think you understand how many Muslims there are in Toronto who are fully separated from the society at large and how much political influence they wield. That is partly the Leftist/Islamist axis Rodan is always talking about. The Unions give the Islamists great backing. Sid Ryan of CUPE, and the NDP/CAW stronghold in Windsor are perfect examples. It is complex, made more so by political correctness which silences any conversation involving Muslims as ‘Islamophobic’. It’s not that we are a bunch of haters. It is that we refuse to be blind to the insidious effects of Stealth Jihad on the Western world. That’s precisely what Bruce Bawer is so effective at defining with real world examples.
I don’t believe that stuff. Spencer and the rest; I think they’re hucksters. From time to time I look at Spencer’s site and try to identify the logical fallacies and rhetorical tricks. There aren’t that many of them, and he uses a lot of repetition. You’ll certainly never hear a single positive thing about any Muslims or Muslim country from any of these people; they rely on selectivity and innuendo. They also lead their readers to draw conclusions they would not themselves state openly, but of course they never correct the readers for drawing such conclusions. Yet they can’t be accused of saying these things because they don’t. Pipes is honorable, others less so IMHO.
Moe Katz wrote:
No problem Moe.
I usually just scroll past the keyboard warrior posts I see on the innertubes here and elsewhere.
Calo wrote:
I wasn’t at my best.
@ Moe Katz:
I wasn’t talking about Spencer. I’ve been following the rise of Canadian anti-Semitism for a decade online. I used to read a great guy out of Quebec. David Oulette? I can’t recall his name at the moment, but he reported daily. He may have gone on to become part of honest reporting Canada. Then there was the Canadian Coalition of Democracies run by Al Gordon. He was really patient and objective, but he got so much spam and threats, he shut down after a few years. Very few private individuals can keep this up month after month, year after year. The mainstream Jewish Community, imo, would vote for Obama if they could. I also read Scaramouche, blazingcatfur, smalldeadanimals, and a couple other Canadian sites. I buy a lot of books to support authors who write on jihad. Two of them have been lawfared out of existence. “Alms for Jihad” and Rachel Ehrenfeld’s “Funding Evil” Saudi oil money sues fact based books, magazines, and newspapers all over the world. So, I’m not relying at all on Spencer because the Canadian experience is unique. We are experiencing the exact same form of stealth jihad, it’s just that we enable it much better than the Americans, imho. Ergo, it’s more successful in Canada. Canada is a major destination for wealthy immigrants who seek a second passport. Has been for years. Quebec has been for longer, since French is a major language for North African/Lebanese Muslims. Bruce Bawer is not a huckster, nor is Ayaan Ali Hirsi for openers.
@ yenta-fada:
Well, I don’t trust Ayaan at all, something fishy about her. Bruce Bawer I don’t know. Most of this literature is riddled with fallacies and hidden agendas, IMHO.
@ Calo:
My metaphor about the punch-drunk fighter was over the top and I know it angered you, but it wasn’t intended for you.
@ yenta-fada:
There’s an Islamophobia industry out there.
@ Moe Katz:
Yes, I know it wasn’t intended for me.
@ Moe Katz:
Agreed, that is what I meant when I said I usually just scroll on by those posts/sites.
@ Moe Katz:
p.s. you didn’t address any of the points or Canadian Islamic groups that I posted about in #70. You just sort of went on about Robert Spencer.
Moe Katz wrote:
That is a broad and sweeping statement that doesn’t address any of my points again.
Moe Katz wrote:
Still not talking about all of the Canadian Muslim associations, are you? Nor do you (apparently) read of any of Canadian bloggers who are anti-Jihad.
@ yenta-fada:
Yenta, I’m sorry but I wouldn’t believe anything from the people you cite without checking other sources, and I don’t have the time to do that. The Blazing Catfur lady, whatever her name is, is a nasty piece of work and a racist and I wouldn’t touch her with a man from Poland who was ten feet tall.
If I may be permitted to change the subject, how are you health-wise?
@ Moe Katz:
Blazingcatfur is a guy. You didn’t mention the books I’ve read on the funding of Jihad and its many tentacles. You merely dismissed all of the blogs and authors I mentioned except for the one you don’t like.
I consider that a poor excuse for a well-reasoned response. If you just toss off the main body of my references and jump on the one or two you don’t like, I’ll take that as putting your fingers in your ears and yelling lalalala or not wanting to do your homework. I’ve been at this a long time. I am not taking this personally or casting aspersions on your belief system. However, I am thinking you are not as educated on this topic as you would like to believe.
Changing the subject doesn’t answer a single point. No, I’m not mad at you at all. I am not without a sense of humor, but this is the subject that originally led me to the swamp. I came over here after a couple of years and posted once. Got the old kickaroo. I’m not even a big Chuckie blaster because, in a free society, I can still change the channel. In a Sharia state……totalitarianism.
Moe Katz wrote:
Hell NO.
CzechRebel and I have been running a counterjihad blog for over five years. We get occasional contributions but nowhere near enough to defray our out-of-pocket expenses for Internet hosting & connectivity to keep the site up, and certainly not for the vast amounts of time and effort we and our contributors spend on getting material to put on it.
None of us are in this for the money, and you can take THAT to the bank.
Oh, and by the way, the term “Islamophobia” was, and is, an invention of the Muslim Brotherhood.
@ yenta-fada:
Blazing Cat Fur and his wife Five Feet of Fury (a/k/a Arnie Lemaire and Kathy Shaidle) are real heroes. They know what they’re talking about.
@ yenta-fada:
lalalalalala
@ 1389AD:
It’s pretty hard to sum up years of work against jihad in a short post to anybody. Heck, my family and most friends don’t listen to me no matter how many facts I give them. That’s because they are leftists first. They have lived in a golden age, so to speak, and they cannot imagine that things could be different and freedoms could be lost.
@ Moe Katz:
Some nights, I do the same.
@ yenta-fada:
Even in a technically non-Sharia Muslim state, like Kuwait.
The internet is filtered. Movies and TV shows are edited.
How long before countries like Canada or the UK, which don’t value free speech the way the US does, begin doing the same in the name of “tolerance”?
@ Calo:
Ya gotta….
Moe Katz wrote:
Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate
Contents:
Introduction
So why learn logical fallacies at all?
Logic as a form of rhetoric
Committing your very own logical fallacies
The list of fallacies:
argumentum ad antiquitatem
argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad ignorantiam
argumentum ad logicam
argumentum ad misericordiam
argumentum ad nauseam
argumentum ad numerum
argumentum ad populum
argumentum ad verecundiam
circulus in demonstrando
complex question
dicto simpliciter
naturalistic fallacy
nature, appeal to
non sequitur
petitio principii
post hoc ergo propter hoc
red herring
slippery slope
straw man
tu quoque
@ yenta-fada:
See also: Obama 2012, “Tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires”
lobo91 wrote:
We still have our kangaroo ‘human rights’ commission, but it has been expensively and privately challenged with some success. We self-censor much more like the Brits. i.e. If someone steps on our toes, we apologize. Not all Canadians are stupid enough to play by these rules. e.g. the permanently victimized and their enabling media and government agencies.
lobo91 wrote:
Leia says *woof, woof*.
@ yenta-fada:
One of the biggest problems is the difference between your legal standards for libel and slander and ours.
The truth is an absolute defense under US law for such charges. It’s not in Canada, Australia or the UK.
lobo91 wrote:
is now one word; millionairesandbillionaires. Should be added to the dictionary
waldensianspirit wrote:
Make sure to note that it’s actually defined as “anyone who makes more money than we think they need.”
@ yenta-fada:
If I see a “UN Observer” near my polling place I will raise the most ruckus possible without causing harm to myself or others.
The event will be recorded, and I would expect the same from any other American citizen concerned about their rights.
Bumr50 wrote:
I’m pretty sure that nobody from the UN would make it into the city limits here.
Bumr50 wrote:
I believe you would. Most would not. We are being conditioned to follow orders. I’m not confrontational in person. Part of that is I react emotionally first, and figure out what I should have said afterwards. When I have the time to think, as I do online, I
use that luxury. Putin is, as we speak, erasing the ability of the Russian people to use the internet freely. Could that happen here? OF COURSE it could!!
@ yenta-fada:
And most people would never know it.
If this site were shut down tomorrow morning, how many people would actually be aware of it? A few hundred, at most.
lobo91 wrote:
If they weren’t wearing uniforms, almost anybody from the UN would fit into Toronto. That is a GOOD thing. At least it used to be before November, 2004 when Muslims in Ontario ALMOST suceeded in putting a form of Sharia Law on the books of the Province. Who stopped them? NOBODY until some Iranian women from Quebec got on the case and found a Liberal Cabinet Minister who was sympathetic to their plight in their former country. The NDP/Socialists were completely caught off guard. They only listened to the Muslims, not the other people of Ontario. I have seen Sharia in action in my neighborhood and it is UGLY.
lobo91 wrote:
Exactly. Therein lies the problem.
@ lobo91:
Meh, talk travels quickly via social media sites these days.
I have no doubt if this site, or any Conservative site, was taken down it would be noticed by more than a few hundred people.
@ yenta-fada:
If anyone did ask why, all the powers that be would have to do is make something up about racism, threats of violence, child pornography, or the like. That would pretty much shut down any complaints. Nobody’s going to go on record as supporting a site accused of hosting child pornography, after all.
Calo wrote:
Which is why the loss of Andrew Breitbart was so strongly felt in the blogger community. If you look at history (generalization) often a relatively small number of people brought about great change. Good and bad.
lobo91 wrote:
It would be tragic to lose hard won freedoms. I am baffled by those who cannot see this, but it possibly stems from my age and my own circumstances.
I recently began reading Brad Thor’s novels, which are interesting because most of them involve current events. The bad guys are often (but not always) Muslim terrorists, for example. He hasn’t given in to the PC demands and changed them to Russian neo-Nazis or some other silliness. His characters frequently discuss the same kinds of things we do here, as well.
His most recent book involves a plot to carry out a “digital Pearl Harbor,” a cyber-attack so massive that it would completely cripple the infrastructure of the US. The interesting thing about the plot, though, is that it isn’t being planned by foreign enemies. Those behind it are the executives of a technology company associated with the government. They realize that in today’s society, real power requires control of the flow of information. Once the dust settles, they intend to implement what’s known as “Internet 2.0,” which would be under their control.
‘night, lobo, Leia, Calo, Moe, lurkers, and the usual and unusual suspects.
http://www.jsmineset.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/clip_image00112.jpg
@ yenta-fada:
The younger generation can’t comprehend a world that’s different from today’s.
Unfortunately, they also mostly don’t understand how fragile it all really is.
@ yenta-fada:
Good night
@ lobo91:
Actually Panetta came out a couple of weeks ago and warned about a CYBER Pearl Harbor type of attack. He wasn’t even using the term ‘cyber’ correctly. I might have a glass of sherry. I feel the vapours coming on…..
@ yenta-fada:
Nite Yenta.
And, thank you for your Canadian perspective on sleep aides.
yenta-fada wrote:
Of course he wasn’t. Do you think he has the slightest idea how computers or the Internet work?
That’s one of the problems with the system as it exists today. The people “in charge” mostly don’t understand what they’re actually in charge of. They rely on a bunch of 20-somethings to tell them what’s going on.
@ lobo91:
So, it’s just us two again left awake?
Calo wrote:
Looks that way
Ugh. I just saw a commercial for FEMA’s flood insurance program.
Just what we need…more taxpayer subsidies to allow people to live in places they shouldn’t.
@ lobo91:
Leia sleeping yet?
I got a wolf on the couch invading my space and a cat in my spot on the bed… I might have to sleep on the patio instead.
Night Lobo.
@ Calo:
Leia sleeps in her own bed in the corner of my bedroom, which is where she is now.
I’m headed that way myself.
Night
@ Moe Katz:
There were good Nazis. Not many, but they were there. I’d say they were about a plentiful as good Muslims. We didn’t let the presance of the Oskar Schindlers stop us from doing what was necessary to stop Nazism, nor did we say “Well, the Nazis are evolving. Things will be better when Hitler dies”, and try to wait them out. We are dealing with Islam as it exists today, not some fantasy of what it could be in 500 years. Islam as it is today is a vile, violent, repressive ideology, and nothing about little girls that occasionally stand up to the oppressors (and get shot for it) will make it better. Di d the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising make Hitler’s Germany more tolerable? Andf the comparison to Nazi Germany is most apt. Islam is expansionist and wants to conquer the world. It is violent and repressive, allowing almost no freedom of conscience or thought. I could go on, but as I said in my last post, Islam is not compatible with civilization. We didn’t try to understand the Nazis. We made sure that they’d never be a threat again. We should do the same with Islam.
@ Iron Fist:
Well, needles to say, I don’t share your view of it. Again, I think we’re in the first quarter of the game and at most a touchdown behind. Open a beer, grab a sandwich, and stay tuned.