Progressives accuses Conservatives of advocating violence. Yet it is the Left that has violent fantasies. A High School halftime show had a routine where Big Bird knocks out Mitt Romney.
Can you imagine the uproar if there was a halftime show having a children’s character knocking out Barack Obama?
Tags: Big Bird, Progressive Violence








He who laughs last…
Sometimes it’s hard to keep the leftist attitude out of school displays. Back in 84 we did a music concert with skits. One of them played off on M*A*S*H with them in their 80′s and being moved from Vietnam to Nicaragua.
Big Bird in High School? And some faculty member thought that the senior class would find Big Bird humorous? How infantile are these kids?
@ pat:
These are today’s kids, so much more infantile and entitled than we were at that age. I’d have been insulted by Big Bird when I was in High School. I certainly didn’t watch Sesame Street by then. You have to question yourself about the qualifications of the staff that approved this. Polls show that we are a 50-50 nation. Why piss on 50% of the people watching your game? These are the people who will vote in the School Board Elections next time around. Maybe they won’t like your trying to indoctrinate little Johnnie and Suzie into the greatness of the Obamessiah.
And you know that they’d have never permitted anything so disrespectful of Obama. Nor should they have, but th ebias is palpable.
You’re making a big deal about this. Is that your High School Rodan?
@ theoutsider:
How would you feel if they showed them knocking out the Obamessiah? It is a matter of decorum and professionalism, which the school is completely lacking here.
I am one of those apparently rare individuals that has never managed to get through a whole minute of Sesame Street.
theoutsider wrote:
You think its OK showing a violent act against a Presidential candidate? Look I thought the skit was funny, but it is advocating violence against Romney.
@ Rodan:
Yeah, you do have to wonder how amused the Secret Service is about this. They aren’t notoriously humorous folks, and they may be tasked with Defending Romney for the next four years starting tomorrow night.
Oh, and Rasmussen has Ohio tied:
It’s a get out the vote election. Whomever gets their people to the polls most successfully will probably win. I think that will be us. We have enthusiasm on our side, and that’ll count a lot. Who wants to stand in line four hours to vote for four more years of economic and national decline? Oh, there will be people who will, but I’m betting far fewer of them than in 2008. And Obama has to duplicate or exceed his 2008 numbers to win. I just don’t see that happening.
@ Iron Fist:
There would be an uproar if there was a skit having Obama knocked out.
@ Rodan:
I think a Medicare recipient or a coal worker punching out Obama would immediately be viewed as RAAAAACIST and juvenile by the MSM. Madcow would get the vapors.
@ Rodan:
The Secret Service would at least interview everyone involved. There was a guy in California who thought it would be a brilliant Halloween gag to hang Obama in effigy in his seasonal display. As I said, the Secret Service aren’t norotiously humorous folks. They interviewd him, but didn’t (that I am aware of) arrest him. I don’t see how this is substantively different, with the exception that there were adults who are responsible for teaching children involved.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3kK5neqzHE
13%. That could be all the difference we need.
ms tfk still has her 20 or so phone bank up and going.
she will shut it down late this afternoon
they have worked for a month now
calling to help get out the vote in Ohio
90% of the call response was great, the people in Ohio say they are going to vote in large numbers, hope the follow up.
make a few call each of you and ask those you call to do the same.
Caption time!
There is going to be an uproar when Obama gets knocked out tomorrow in the election.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Zig Zags?, right here Mr President
heysoos wrote:
I have a feeing i’ve never had one of those
Anyone notice anything interesting about the high school students in the video?
father_of_10 wrote:
sure did, and I didn’t even play it
@ father_of_10:
na nothing
Another bit of good news:
This is based on the D+11 (11ty!!) poll CNN did. I’ll go out on a limb here and predict that there is no way Obama gets D+11 (he got D+7 or D+8 in 2008). Still, the important thing to look at is indeendents. If we really wind up with th ekind of split Gallup is predicting, Romney should win handily.
waldensianspirit wrote:
Barry definitely has.
heysoos wrote:
They’re all wearing the same uniform?/?/?/
Sad day yesterday at the father of 10 house. Spot died.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
What kind of high school would do an anti-Romney skit at half-time?
Urban Infidel wrote:
Ahhh CHA Cha cha chaaa
father_of_10 wrote:
@ father_of_10:
Spot? My condolences.
This is Mother of 10′s blog post abut spot:
http://goldenbeehive.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-memory-of-spot.html
father_of_10 wrote:
a school that is mostly black students, like the vid shows
@ father_of_10:
My condolences and hope the grief will be short.
father_of_10 wrote:
A kind of school where the admins are knuckleheads.
heysoos wrote:
Bingo.
From Althouse:
Paul Ryan had them standing outside the venue yesterday in (was it?)Ohio (I think; might have been Pennsylvania, though). Again, this points to enthusiasm. We’ve got it, they don’t. And Wisconsin is one of the three critical states, one I think we’ll almost certainly win. Rasmussen has it tied, but polls don’t measure the people on the ground. And our people onthe ground in Wisconsin have delivered four straight elections since 2010. That’s a winning record. The latest was in June, so it is a current record, too. The Democrats have a recent history of losing in Wisconsin, no matterhow it went for Obama in 2008. This isn’t going to be 2008 redeaux. That is certain.
@ heysoos:
Yeah, skin color seems to trump everything for some people. They certainly aren’t judging Obama by the content of his character.
@ Iron Fist:
Read the polls? Can it be any clearer?
@ theoutsider:
No, it looks like it is over for Obama. If D+11 only gets him even, there’s no way he can win, not even with a D+7 like 2008. And he isn’t going to get D+7. Gallup is predicting R+0 or R+1. If we get that this will be a landslide election against Obama. Did you look at how CNN’s biased poll showed independents breaking? 59-35 in Romney’s favor! Obama can’t survive the independents breaking like that.
@ Iron Fist:
You do know that the outsider doesn’t care about facts and keeps parroting his talking points. Its almost like he/she is brain washed to just keep repeating the same line. Its sad really… Almost makes me feel pity.
father_of_10 wrote:
As you can see by his arms, the “Romney” character is a black student with A) a white Romney mask and B) white gloves. If that were reversed, everyone on MSNBC would be screaming “blackface!”. Liberals, thy name is hypocrisy.
@ Iron Fist:
My wife is reporting that Gallup’s final numbers are in and they favor Romney, but they aren’t up on their website yet. I’ll post the final numbers when I get them.
theoutsider wrote:
typical 47% lib…always demanding without ever giving back, just take take take
@ Iron Fist:
Come on IF, Are You serious, if not, you are the last person on the planet that knows it. It’s Over.
@ Iron Fist:
It’s over man. Give it up.
Has anyone lost a sock while getting up this morning?
its pretty bad when the dem have to send in bill clinton to pittsburgh the day before the election to rah rah support for a dem president.
this is unprecedented!
0 is that unpopular with the dems in allegheny county. this is a very very bad sign for 0;s chances in PA tomorrow.
@ MikeA:
Oh, I know. I have no desire to convert the Outsider. I am doing this for two reasons: 1) it amuses me, and 2) for the benefit of our readers. The Outsider is simple to counter, but most of our casual readers may not have time to dig up and analyse the relevant data. It is pretty simple to provide a link and a little analysis on the poll here. If the CNN poll is right about independents, then Obama is done. I’d say his internal pollsters have already told him to prepare a concession speech. And I don’t see CNN reporting such dismal numbers unless they were certain that they were solid. I mean, they went to the trouble to skew the poll with a D+11 sample to try and make Obama’s numbers look good, and they probably diddled with how they determined “likely” voters to his favor as well. Even was the best they could do for him. You know they wouldn’t have reported the independent vote, even if it was burried, if they thought they could have gotten away with it. This is something that the casual observer would likely miss, though, because CNN burried the lede. The headline should have been “Romney trounces Obama among Independents”. That is the unbaised take on the CNN poll.
coldwarrior wrote:
donks admire and respond to liars, grifters, grafters, cheaters and other male scum…so Clintons the perfect choice to speak for BO
@ coldwarrior:
Hope Clinton sees a lot of stoic faces
@ heysoos:
they dare not send 0. he is incredibly unpopular with the old school dem machine in pgh.
they fact that the dems had to send anyone to allegheny county a day before the election spells really really bad news for the dems on election night. that county/city should be an easy lock for these guys.
there is something happenin’ here…
@ theoutsider:
@ theoutsider:
Oh, give it up, man. Nobody’s buying your line of bullshit. You can’t deny what CNN’s biased poll states about the way the independents are breaking, and you surely do not believe that Obama will turn out D+11 crowds at the polls tomorrow. I’d honestly be surprised if he broke D+1. Enthusiasm is on our side, and that is critical in an election like this. Even you aren’t enthusiastic about Obama. You don’t trumpet all the good he’s supposedly done for our country. You just run down Romney every chance you get. That’s the Dem talking points, almost verbatim from their campaign website. Nobody but the hard-core Leftists believe that tripe.
@ coldwarrior:
That’s a move to motivate thei base. Clinton is enormously popular with the Democrat base. Romney is cleaning up with independents while Obama is trying to motivate his base. It is 2008 in reverse. You don’t have to be a weatherman to see which way this wind is blowing…
@ Iron Fist:
d+11 isnt reality, it is a masturbatory fantasy of the left.
Last poll from Michigan, Romney +1
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/link/597723/final-michigan-election-poll-for-2012-election
Iron Fist wrote:
0′s base in alleghey county undervoted him 30% in the primary.
one 1 out of 3 dems refused to vote for him. 0 is in huge trouble in sw pa and that spell sure doomage.
coldwarrior wrote:
and I’d add something fishy is happening in Chicagoland and even in CA…BO’s support is eroding…I’d like to see the numbers after the smoke clears…it could be a mandate blowout by popular vote
Daffy Duck wrote:
well then…
@ Iron Fist:
I do appreciate you putting the polls up with the analysis. Its excellent work. Its just I am getting tired of the idiot outsider who keeps spouting stuff but offers no proof. Its like that drunk guy at the bar who sits next to you and keeps acting like an ass. You just wish the bouncer would come by and throw him out.
on the other hand, radical Muslim support for BO continues to grow…
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/161726#.UJgEzoaN1by
@ coldwarrior:
Yep. Like I said, I’d be surprised if it were D+1 overall this election. The Republicans are too motivated, and our stock has gone up too much. And there is no way on a remotely even field that Obama can survive losing the independents 59-35. Not even if he turns out his base at 110% through fraud.
heysoos wrote:
Even after Obama went out and personally slew the Leader of the islamic spear. Who knew
Iron Fist wrote:
keep an eye on phillie county….
@ MikeA:
he gets email marching orders every day. the talking points are in there.
Turn on FOX News -- Adm Ham I believe is gonna be interviewed about Libya in a minute or two (1:33pm EST time now)…
hmmm…local dem rag is only showing tight in pics of billie jeff in pgh, guess not a lot of folks turned out or i would see the pics with a throng hundreds and thousands of happy people, instead, no mention of the crowd size.
FLOP!!!
4_Sticks wrote:
Nope. First, it General Ham, not Admiral.
Megyn Kelly is going to have a retired admiral on who used to be the commander of the Pacific fleet.
@ coldwarrior:
Yeah, the Democrats have telegraphed that fraud will be an important part of their strategy this year, but it is in every election. That is why they are so resistent to Voter ID and similar measures to keep only legal voters voting. They count on fraud to win close elections. That is my only worry in Ohio, too. It could be close, and there could be enough fraud to tip it. But I don’t think so. And I don’t think there’s any way they managet o steal Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Obama’s got to have all three. If Romney wins one of them, it’s Hello Mr. President Romney. I am so looking forward to that moment.
Sorry, ‘General’ … just caught it outta the corner of my eye. Its supposed to be coming up shortly.
coldwarrior wrote:
“Shun the unbeliever! Shuuun! Shuuun!”
--The Outsider
A smart @ coldwarrior:
Bubba isn’t used to that
last of the honest old-school patriotic dems says goodby
he is the only dem i ever voted for.
Fifth Column Treasonous Media Mendacious Malfeasance in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.
Gallup numbers from Businessweek:
Close, but Romney is still leading. It again points to turnout and enthusiasm being key. If the polls are this close, Romney has to get his better-motivated voters to the polls in large enough numbers to beat the inevitible fraud. Will he succeed? We’ll know tomorrow night.
She made it sound like it was coming up right after the commercial break so I type it up as fast as my fingers could type (difficult for me). I didn’t want anyone to miss it -- my primary concern. Sorry for the error …
must. go. buy. beer….
bbib
4_Sticks wrote:
admiral, general..same thing. high level flag officer.
Someone earlier asked what to serve tomorrow night.
Here’s my suggestion:
doriangrey wrote:
good post….thanks
@ coldwarrior:
My point was that it’s not General Ham. It’s a retired officer who wrote an editorial about Obama’s lousy leadership.
I seriously doubt that General Ham is going to be doing any interviews about Libya anytime soon.
Retired Adm. James A. Lyons maybe ??
@ coldwarrior:
It’s not just legislators. The entire federal government does that, including the military.
4_Sticks wrote:
Yup
@ 4_Sticks:
Yep.
@ lobo91:
He really couldn’t, except to give Administration talking points, couold he? That was what got McCrystal cashiered.
4_Sticks wrote:
Here’s the op-ed piece he wrote:
LYONS: Obama needs to come clean on what happened in Benghazi
lobo91 wrote:
And the sciences. Massive accepted corruption in overselling of break throughs and technologies. Massive
Iron Fist wrote:
Pretty much
suffering in the Far Rockaways?….need supplies and generators?
go to Central Park where Bloomberg keeps his stash…
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/running_into_brick_wall_O7eD7uSm23n0BLdYhMz9eJ
Pew finds Obama up by three, but below 50%. They had predicted Obama would be at 50% or better by now:
The Pew poll is at D+6 to get those results. I think that is dreaming. Like I’ve said, Gallup is estimating R+0 or R+1. The Republicans have the more motivated base, and the independents are swinging our way. The linked article doesn’t give Pew’s breakdown or how the independents swing in the poll. Critical details that are left out because they don’t favor Obama.
@ waldensianspirit:
True, but that’s not what he was talking about.
Every September, the entire federal government typically spends every last penny of its budget buying crap with whatever money is left from the year, rather than leaving it unspent.
The reasoning is that if you don’t spend it all, they’ll give you less next fiscal year.
waldensianspirit wrote:
very revealing…so I say the solution is cuts in education!….vote for me!
@ lobo91:
Don’t have time to read the entire article. The first 2 paragraphs are powerful and chilling.
What will happen when, those SA-7s are used to take out civilian passenger aircraft.
More bumps in the road?
@ lobo91:
And this goes for at least one States agencies … always ask for a 3% increase for next year and spend every cent by end of this fiscal/budget year: SOP.
@ lobo91:
It is the same thing in the sciences. Spend or lose it and lose grant monies from NIH DOE etc
@ citizen_q:
If Obama is in office, he’ll blame Bush.
@ lobo91:
ANd in general the People simply accept that. Nothing will get better until we take that away. America is going broke. We can look forward to a blank wall and know approximately when we will go broke. Yet nobody really wants to change that.
heysoos wrote:
Thanks, I pretty much only write about what I think is important, and this is something I think is important.
doriangrey wrote:
Your post is now up on Special Report. I have a post coming up at 1500 giving the MSM both barrels.
@ 4_Sticks:
And the stockpiling that results from the last minute mad dash to spend down this years money on redundant/often useless crap leads to ‘mis appropriation’ like ya wouldn’t believe. Your tax dollars hard at work …
If the average tax payer only knew.
@ huckfunn:
I’ve go t a meeting at 3, but I absolutely despise the MFM. My wife was just emailing me that Fox has unedited CBS footage of Obama on 9-12, and he most definately does not call Benghazi a terror attack. Fox is the only network that is worth a bucket of warm piss.
The video is from Central High School, in Beaumont Texas. Beaumont is now a Democrat run city, with all that entails and Central High is a classic inner city ‘school.’ Sad really, Beaumont is the home of the Spindletop oil discovery and was once a great place to live.
@ lobo91:
Thank you for that. Reading bottom to top again … just caught it
He certainly called out the msm too !
lobo91 wrote:
I’m probably going to go in big for tequila.
@ Iron Fist:
I hope the Romney admin will have a special media office devoted to countering the lies of MSM. GWB let those bastards roll right over him.
Urban Infidel wrote:
I’m not really going to buy a bottle of Utopias. I just thought it was a nice coincidence that they released it now.
That’s not the most expensive product Sam Adams makes, believe it or not.
Bordm wrote:
LOL! What a coincidence! That’s my wife’s hometown and that might be her alma matter.
huckfunn wrote:
Cool, I hope you loaded with quarter or dines…
This can’t be good.
Iron Fist wrote:
and FN has a ton of time and money into a story they know will be told….they are all alone so far out in front, they will never give it up….toss in the victims peeps, SEAL types and pissed off bloggers, BO will answer, somehow, some way….I believe that
@ doriangrey:
Have to be dimes! If you’ve got a shotgun that’ll shoot quarters< I don';t want to be the one that shoots it. That'd be, what, about a 1 gauge?
Slick Willy Clinton calls our Military “racist, sexist and homophobic’.
Holy sh*t, I always figured but … wow, just wow.
lobo91 wrote:
That’s insane. It’s beer!
Urban Infidel wrote:
Last time I saw a bottle of their Millennium Ale for sale, it was around $1,000
Iron Fist wrote:
I saw a program where they debunked the idea of loading shogun shells with dimes, Mythbusters-style.
It really isn’t very effective. Regular shot works better.
Urban Infidel wrote:
DHS--and particularly TSA--has had morale problems from day one.
TSA’s turnover rate is the worst in the entire federal government. It rivals some private security companies.
lobo91 wrote:
heh, I saw it too and
was gonna mention that very factoid…dimes bounced of a riding duster….low velocity, but a cool old Billy the Kid myth…”oh Bob!”
Here’s a link about the SeeBS “news” outtakes of Obama:
SeeBS doing for Obama what they tried to do to Bush. They got caught this time too.
Iron Fist wrote:
Not sure, but it looks really cool in the Resident Evil movie when Alice does it to kill the Zombie hordes…
@ Iron Fist:
is that a throbbing I sense?
@ citizen_q:
IIRC, Central was formed a few years ago, by merging the old French High School and Beaumont High School. Sigh, change is never for the better, when it’s Democrats applying the change.
@ doriangrey:
This will work much better for killing zombies.
hey ya’ll
rain here
home for lunch and following up on something I heard at work
and guess what…..
bwahahahahahahahah
I don’t think this is gonna work the way they wanted it to.
California: Brown Signs Electoral College Revision
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: August 8, 2011
Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill on Monday that would award all 55 of California’s Electoral College votes to the winner of the national popular vote. The movement behind the effort, by a group called National Popular Vote, seeks to prevent a repeat of 2000, when Al Gore won the popular vote but George W. Bush won the electoral vote. California is the eighth state to sign on
@ Urban Infidel:
Hmm, and I figured 400,000,000 rounds of ammo would have cheered them up.
/ (it would cheer me up)
@ momcat:
are you SURE that is law in CA????
@ momcat:
I linked that earlier. Carolina Girl says they’;ve already crawfished on it. Not going to happen. I guess they figured out that they might elect a Republican that way.
momcat wrote:
SIGH… You too momcat? Really? Have you read the Bill? It ONLY goes into effect if 51 percent of the States adopt it. Not even close right now, in other words, it does nothing. Has no impact what so ever.
@ momcat:
I don’t think that’s going to actually have any effect on this election, because it isn’t operative yet:
@ coldwarrior:
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee (gasp) eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!
@ Iron Fist:
@ coldwarrior:
No, it’s not. It’s an interstate compact, and it’s not in effect.
doriangrey wrote:
Did Jerry Brown read it before signing it? That is a more pertinent question. This was meaningless fluff from a State that is rapidly going bankrupt. Really, can it get more silly? Don’t answer. It is California. Y’all have sodomy as the Official State Sex Act…
coldwarrior wrote:
Yes, but you NEED to read the law. It’s just a goofy proposition that like 8 other states also signed on to.
@ coldwarrior:
@ doriangrey:
@ lobo91:
not momcat
me rain
I knew it was too good to be true but could not find any info
debunking it
@ Iron Fist:
That thing will likely never go into effect. It needs states totalling 51% of the electoral votes to sign on first, and if they ever do get to that level, it’ll undoubtedly be challenged in court.
I doubt that the Supreme Court would let it stand.
momcat wrote:
It doesn’t matter either way since it can’t pass the Article I, Section 10 of the US Constitution test.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power.
lobo91 wrote:
I don’t know about that. IIRC, the States select the method that is used to Select the Electors. If a State wanted to say that they wanted to use the national popular vote to select their Electors, it would probably stand if the voters of the State let it. I don’t see why the voters of any State, let alone a State that swung as big n electoral hammer as California, would want to dilute their individual votes so much, though. Effectively, it would give me as much a say as Dorian in how California’s electors were selected.
@ momcat:
Doriangray can explain this -- it means nothing for this election and is actually part of a national movement that will require 3/4ths of the states to sign on. I mentioned it on the radio show a couple months ago, and Dorian gave a more complete explanation of what it meant. I wish it did. It would SO definitely be over.
another reason my faith in the feds is zero…this is unforgivable, and I recall the same ‘problem’ in 04….this really sucks and hard to believe it’s not contrived so I ain’t fallen for it
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/265925-gop-senators-thousands-of-ballots-unlikely-to-reach-military-voters
@ doriangrey:
That clause isn’t absolute. It’s been ruled on by the Supreme Court several times. It only prohibits agreements or compacts that infringe on federal powers. There are all sorts of interstate compacts in effect on different issues.
Having said that, though, this would probably be seen as one of those issues that are prohibited, but the courts would have to decide it.
What is kind of interesting is knowing California and our incredible stockpile of unhappy far left voters and the fact that they are really unhappy that O isn’t radical enough and they have their choice of all kinds of asshat people to vote for …. heck, Romney could win it here if enough of them vote for Rosanne Barr or just stay home.
@ Iron Fist:
That’s not the issue. If it were just one state deciding to do that on its own, it’s free to do so. In fact, there are already a couple of states that use different procedures to award their electoral votes.
The issue with this compact is that it only goes into effect when they get states totalling 51% of the total electoral vote to sign on, which would then give those states effective veto power over the election process.
lobo91 wrote:
there is a pact between Great Lakes states that I believe was challenged and upheld by the SC
Heh

huckfunn wrote:
oh look at the little toddler racist!
@ heysoos:
There’s a big potential clusterfuck in Ohio, too. They sent out absentee ballot applications to every single registered voter in the state. A couple hundred thousand of the people who returned those applications and were sent ballots haven’t sent them back in.
If those people instead show up at the polls tomorrow to vote in person, they’ll be given provisional ballots. So far, so good.
The problem is that Ohio doesn’t count provisional ballots until November 17th (ten days after the election date).
If they have a couple hundred thousand provisional ballots, that could be the difference in the election. If it comes down to Ohio, we could be waiting until a week from Friday to hear who won.
@ lobo91:
I don’t know the relevant case law on that. The Supreme Court would have to weigh in on that, and hat is going to depend on how invested the individual Justices are in the traditional definition of Federalism. I’d say Sontomayor and Kagan would be just fine with this. The Conservative Justices would not.
@ heysoos:
There are interstate compacts covering all sorts of things. As long as they don’t interfere with federal powers, they’re fine.
There’s one addressing the apportionment of water from the Rio Grande, for example.
@ heysoos:
You left four “A”s out of RAAAAACIST…
heysoos wrote:
He’s probably a tea pottier.
@ Iron Fist:
I doubt that they’ll ever get enough states to sign on to make it an issue, so it’s a moot question.
Iron Fist wrote:
Notify the disciplinary committee and have him dealt with.
@ lobo91:
precisely why we need a friggin blowout…somehow avoid the blizzard of lawsuits we know are coming…it’s disappointing to me that we cannot design a flawless voting machine, figure out the absentee system, a way to collect the votes and count them properly etc…it seems contrived to me…that Al Franken gig was really a telling embarrassment
lobo91 wrote:
yeah , I don’t know much about, so I rely on you…good job btw
@ heysoos:
I used to work for the NM legislature. There was a committee that mostly dealt with compacts.
lobo91 wrote:
Smells of a Al Franken styled plot…
heysoos wrote:
It can be done easily.
It hasn’t been done because the Democrats don’t want it to be done. It would eliminate their chances to steal elections.
@ doriangrey:
I don’t know who’s idea it was to send abesntee ballot applications to every registered voter in the state, but it was a dumb one. Half the people receiving them probably didn’t even understand what it was and just signed it and sent it back.
@ Bordm:
If Central was formed only a few years ago, it’s not my wife’s Alma Matter. She as I have been our of High School for several decades.
I don’t remember the name of her high school, guess I could ask, only that their mascot was the Trojans, so I had to tease her about that and why I remember that tid bit.
New thread
Top military brass endorse Romney.
The list is here.
Gallup
RV: Obama 49(+1) -- Romney 46(-2)
LV: Obama 48(+2) -- Romney 49(-2)
wow a 4 point swing in favor of Obama
Obamentum is growing XDDDDD
Urban Infidel wrote:
Make that ‘retired’ military brass.
Shepard Smith just showed a clip of Obama at a campaign stop complaining about Romney’s use of his “change” mantra, and how he’s the real candidate of “change.”
How, exactly, can the incumbent claim to be the candidate of “change”?
lobo91 wrote:
actually the only reason I mentioned the Great Lakes is because I’m intrigued by the whole thing….the pacts involving the Rio Grande and the Colorado river are really interesting to me…I visit my kin in Yuma and am always amazed at the complexity of the canal, acequias, drainage systems of the farming basins over there….really amazing, who gets what, how and when
@ heysoos:
There are loads of them.
The laws that allow you to use your concealed carry permit in other states are interstate compacts, for example.
Teh Other McCain on Fear and Loathing in Ohio:
I hope Akbar is right. Ohio will seal Obama’s defeat, even if we lose Pennsylvania. So, too, would Wisconsin. It doesn’t look good for Obama, but anything could happen. We’ll likely know by midnight tomorrow night, barring some grave and unfortunately foreseeable circumstance. Then we may not know for another ten days.
@ heysoos:
The Colorado River compact and issues surrounding it are so complex that my masters program actually had an optional concentration in it.
ferb123 wrote:
getting a little boner?
lobo91 wrote:
When he is the candidate of pocket change. As in that is all we will have left when he and his merry band of marxists are through with us.
@ heysoos:
Pretty sure that’s the only kind he could get…
//
lobo91 wrote:
I don’t claim to understand much of that, I’ve never studied that part of it, but the actual dynamics involved are mind boggling…it’s my understanding that both those rivers have created the largest system of it’s type in the world
citizen_q wrote:
I have a bumper sticker on my car that says “Obama spent my change.”
@ 44 heysoos: heh so true
@ heysoos:
There have been numerous cases before the Supreme Court over them, which is probably getting old for them. It’s one of the few times the Supreme Court acts as a trial court.
I thought all this Big Bird hoopla was just the case where Obama gave the big middle finger to hilary.
heysoos wrote:
hey, the avatar on the left is not me XDDDDDDDD
@ lobo91:
Good one!
I saw a Veterans for Obama bumper sticker last night. Wifey advised me not offer him condolences on his head injury. Told the wife a head injury is the only explanation for anyone but especially a veteran to be supportive of comrade zero.
heysoos wrote:
hmmm, maybe I should change my avatar XDDDDDDDD
@ citizen_q:
No kidding.
ferb123 wrote:
I don’t give a damn what your avatar is, but if you’re considering a change, why not change forums?
lobo91 wrote:
They found that one guy. Kind of like Chickens for Colonel Sanders.
This has nothing to do with skin color if thats what your referring to.
@ song_and_dance_man:
correction, not all of the band members are black it just appears that way. I know this because I happen to attend this school and I refuse to sit and watch people make false judgements about something that they have only seen and not witnessed. Another thing, the skit is not about racism. It’s about who we are voting for and why. We are not racis, if anything I think the real ones being racis are you guys. Everything is not about the color of peoples skin. Lets be mature please.