Imagine The Vatican and The Wailing Wall in Jerusalem being ripped up to make way for soulless buildings just like in Las Vegas. Or the Taj Mahal in India being demolished to replace it with something even more terrible.
Well, that’s what the Saudis have in mind for Mecca and Medina. And the Mohammedans say nothing about it:
In Mecca, the house of one of Mohammed’s wives has been demolished to make space for public lavatories. His birthplace may disappear, too, as part of King Abdullah’s scheme to complement the skyscrapers and shopping malls with a Grand Mosque fashioned from the same materials as a multi-storey car park in Wolverhampton.
As for Islam’s second holiest place, the city of Medina, a recent article by Jerome Taylor in the Independent revealed a megalomaniac plan to pull down three 7th-century mosques. Taylor added: “Ten years ago, a mosque which belonged to the Prophet’s grandson was dynamited. Pictures of the demolition that were secretly taken and smuggled out of the kingdom showed the religious police celebrating.”
Only a small minority of the world’s billion Muslims are Wahhabis, despite the tens of billions of petrodollars spent by the Saudis propagating their creed. (Bosnia, for example, is now littered with Saudi-style mosques, replacing the graceful Ottoman architecture that Wahhabis detest.) Many pilgrims to Mecca are revolted by the marriage of Puritanism and greed they find there. Yet protests are scattered and muted. Why?
That giant clock is only part of the grand scheme to ensure their followers don’t worship superstitious idols. Islam is the perfect embodiment of what George Orwell foretold in “Nineteen Eighty-Four”: “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed-if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’“
THAT…is why it must be destroyed, like dominoes.
They don’t want to die!
mornin ya’ll
gleefully awaiting our morning banter with ferb
@ rain of lead:
Yeah, the boy ain’t all there, is he? Guggi is right. He makes Germans look bad.
keep your spirits up
A Better America
@ Storagemanager:
That is the textbook definition of a sociopath. One of the things that Obama shows in spades is a flattened affect. He just doesn’t show emotion normally on any level. People joke about him being Spock, but this isnot the behavior of a well-functioning human being. In a word, he is not well. He is probably not insane, as he knows the difference between right and wrong, but he is disturbed, as he really doesn’t care when he does wrong.
could Obama lose Chicago. CHICAGO? CHICAGO!
Massive Decrease in Early and Absentee Voting—in Chicago
The Illinois Republican party claims early and absentee voting has precipitously fallen since the 2008 presidential election.
According to the numbers, at this point in 2008, there were 260,376 early voters and 304,290 absentee voters. Now, the party maintains, there are 195,064 early voters and 46,232 absentee voters. That’s a loss of 57 percent of voters, since the last election
The Chicago Board of Elections is reporting 240k in early voting and claiming it’s on track to surpass 2008 -- but they’re actually combining 2012 Early Voting and absentee voting, and then comparing that sum to 2008′s early voting numbers (excluding absentee). There is a significant 57% drop in voter participation in the City of Chicago from 2008 -- in the President’s hometown. I’d also point out that despite the Chicago Board’s point that early voting is four days shorter this year than in 2008, Illinois recently instituted “vote-by-mail” without an excuse needed, i.e. early voting by mail. This did not exist in 2008 and should have vastly expanded the numbers.”
Good morning all!
He’s to the defeat of the obama regime!
On topic, this is islam.
This is what we are importing by allowing muslim
immigrationinvasion.@ Storagemanager:
the prediction is for historically high turnout in the T in PA.
this might be a bloddy night for the dems. PA has been slowly marching toward the red since the late 80′s…the county i live in was once a bulwark of conservative dems, it is now firmly red. this is repeated elsewhere. it looks like our koke of a senator Dem Bob Casy jr will lose to former unuion coal miner and now mine owner tom smith.
(useless bob jr is the son of the brave conservative old school democrat governor bob casey Casey who is best known for leading the pro-life wing of the Democratic Party, taking the lead in fighting Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a major Supreme Court case that upheld almost all the prohibitions on abortion that Casey signed into law. He championed unions, believed in government as a beneficent force, and supported gun rights. )He was forbidden from speaking at the 82 dem convention.
it looks ugly for the dems here on the ground in PA, they have lost allegheny county as well, the dems in PGH despise these communists like obama and want the party purged of these aged hippie commies. obama has to get almost more votes on phillie county than there are voters to keep this race even close, the ‘burbs around phillie are trending to romney and as i said, the T is pissed and ready to vote in record turnout.
pennsyltucky strikes back, revenge of the bitter clingers.
so its off to the CC, bbl!
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the Keystone State finds incumbent Democratic Senator Bob Casey, Jr. with 46% of the vote, while Republican Tom Smith attracts 45%. Nine percent (9%) are still undecided…
bbl!
citizen_q wrote:
Yes, they have no need of history because they are stuck in the 7th Century anyway. They have a vastly different values system that places no value on anything outside of Imperial Islam. They have a values system that relies on a Master-Slave relationship everywhere. As the Saudis are the Masters of Mecca, what they do with it is entirely up to lem. They could raise the city and build it completely anew, and the Mohammedan world would be silent. They only recognize other Mohammedans as Masters, though, and believe that infidels in the top position must be resisted to the death.
Hello,
just 1 day to go!
An irish bookmaker already declared Obama as winner and pay out to those who bet on Obama!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/nov/4/bookie-declares-election-over-pays-out-obama-win
but its not too late. You can still bet on Obama on intrade or many other bookmaker
@ coldwarrior:
I hope you are right. If Pennsylvania goes to Romney, the election is essentially over with. It is only by keeping Pennsylvania in the Obama camp that Obama has a chance of winning. Even if he does that, he still has to win both Ohio and Wisconsin to win. If he wins all three, then we have lost the election, though. Dick Morris was on Fox yesterday predicting that Romney would win all three. HE’s saying Romney in a Landslide. I hope, I hope, I hope! If Romney wins big we’ll get the Senate as well. That’s really what we need to do to save the country. We can’t have four more years like the last four.
rain of lead wrote:
morning
Obama and McCain will be very happy…..
America has no business in a Sunni vs Shia war…no matter who wins it is a loss for Israel.
@ ferb123:
re intrade
eh, not so much
WAYYYY to many hoops to jump through to join here in the good ol US of A
intrade is mainly for suckers in Europe
@ ferb123:
A bookmaker declared it so, so it is all over! Right. So what’s he going to do when Romney wins? He’ll have paid out both sides of the bet. Did you see the poll I linked on the previous thread? CNN used a D+11 poll to get Obama even with Romney. If you believe that there will really be a D+11 vote, I might be interested in a bet with oyouon that! No way Obama gets even close to that. Gallup is predicting an R+0 or R+1 turnout, and Gallup has been doing this for a while. If Gallup is anywhere near right, Obama will lose in a historic fashion. Did you see where Minnesota is in play? I don’t really expect to win there, but that it is close is telling. Romney is up with independents in every poll. That and turnout will be telling. We have the momentum and we have the enthusiasm. Obama has nothing but the color of his skin.
@ Storagemanager:
It is a loss for America, too. Ideally, if the Sunni are winning we should help the Shia, and if the Shia are winning we should help the Sunni. Keep it going, and kill as many of the bastards as possible.
@ Iron Fist:
Obama has his hate & anger at America…for the trolls..that is enough.
Iron Fist wrote:
In a just world…but…in this world…that will never happen…
Iron Fist wrote:
The betting sites are not betting on the party ID turnout, but on who become next president.
And here all bookmaker says the same. Obama is the big fav!
http://www.oddschecker.com/specials/politics-and-election/us-presidential-election/winner
@ Storagemanager:
Yeah, and that’ll win him California and most of the NOrtheast (with the exception of New Hampshire), but that isn’t going to fly in flyover country. At the end of the day he’s been a miserable failure. That may send a tingle down Ferb’s leg, but that won’t win voters in Ohio. The only thing I am really worried about is Fraud. The Dems always have fraud on their side. That is why they’ve been so hysterical about voter ID. Cut out the fraud, and the Dems might not hold the Senate today. There is no doubt that Al Franken stole his seat.
@ Iron Fist:
IF, @ Iron Fist:
Keep Dreaming ON. Romney is toast.
Obama will make me rich tomorrow XDDDD
@ ferb123:
They are all paying attention to the same cooked polls. You aren’t going to get voters to D+11 or even D+7 (what Obama got in 2008). If you have realistic samples in these polls, Romney wins. I can’t help it if you don’t understand how that works. I’ve been patient and explained this to you many times. Tomorrow, we will demonstrate very forcefully how this works. In Europe, it may not matter who votes or who you vote for, but in America it makes a massive difference. We’ll do a better job of getting our people to th epolls in the critical states, and Romney is up among independents by double-digits. That’ll carry the day easily. If you’ve really bet a lot of money on Obama, I hope it isn’t money you need to pay the rent…
Storagemanager wrote:
Sounds like the inspiration for the demoncraps elections strategy. Can’t stand on the facts or their record; demonize and eliminate the competition.
ferb123 wrote:
hope ya didn’t bet the egg money
Congratutations on your second term President Obama.
@ theoutsider:
hahahaha
dream on
@ theoutsider:
We’ll know in 48 hours, but the undecideds at this late a date always berak for the challenger. And independents are Romney’s by double-digits. YOu have to get the D+11 turnout just to make it a tie. You don’t really believe that Obama is going to get a bigger turnout this election than he got in 2008, do you? I know I don’t, and neither does Gallup. They are predicting an R+0 or R+1 turnout, which would be in line with the Republicans having the enthusiasm this year. Obama can’t win if we get that kind of turnout. You know this. Why do you persist in denying it? You can’[t depress my vote. I’ve already voted in a state that will go heavily to Romney.
I am guessing that the Obama Storm Troopers ,SEIU, ACORN, Move On,
New Black Panthers etc. are getting ready for tomorrow.
Good morning. I have a question for the day. What is the best party food and drink for election day?
@ Iron Fist:
how big will tennessee go for romney?
the last # I heard was that 1.4 MILLION people had voted early here
Rasmussen has Romney at 50% in Virginia:
Virginia is Romney’s. yay! That is a toss-up state because of the massive presance of Federal Workers in the area around DC. Another domino falls…
@ momcat:
Bacardi 151. It is a food, a drink, and in an emergency you can run your car on it!
{momcat}
@ momcat:
not sure about the food and drink but I do know the Dems are gonna need a great big crying towel
@ momcat:
I am thinking Chili and Texas Tea!!!
momcat wrote:
buffalo wings and beer
I do have some tennessee moonshine
Storagemanager wrote:
I respectfully disagree.
They are both our fanatical enemies. We have business is goading sunni and shia to war upon each other. Let them kill each other in an attempt to sate their tribal and deity’s insatiable blood-lust.
Weakens them, and keeps their attention away from civilization.
Just my opinion, FWIW.
@ rain of lead:
Yeah, I saw that. I don’ tknow how big we’ll go for Romney, but it’ll be big. You have to remember, you have the Nashville and Memphis vote that goes Democrat. They’d go Democrat if the Dems ran Satan himself onthe ticket. But the rest of the state offsets that. I’ll be so glad when this is done and won. I am looking forward to gloating Wendesday, and then for the next four years. I am starting to smell a landslide coming on. If the Dems are having to cookthe polls to D+11 to pull even (CNN poll), then they are in deep trouble. I know their talking points are upbeat, but Obama isn’t drawing the crowds he was drawing in 2008. He has to do better than 2008 to win. I don’t see that as a reachable goal.
@ Iron Fist:
lol. Multi use is always good.
citizen_q wrote:
That is not what Obama is doing…he is letting the Sunni win one country after another…and then ruled by the Muslim brotherhood.
@ Iron Fist:
I agree memphis will go hard for Obama but Nashville might be a suprise and swing for Romney, I think it will
Iron Fist wrote:
rasmussen has also Obama and Romney tied in popular votes and they are surely not using D+11. How you explain this?
The Sunni under the Muslim brotherhood are building the Caliphate they have fought and dreamed of since 1922.
Rasmussen’s final Daily Tracking Poll is out:
\
This is still essentially a tie, but I think a tie goes to the challenger. The undecides are going to break for Romney. They’ve had four years to decide for Obama and haven’t. They aren’t going to suddenly jump on his bandwagon at this late date. Oh, some will, but th emajority will go to Romney. And we’ll win.
@ rain of lead:
A serving of crow with a nice California WHINE to go along with it.
@ ferb123:
Rasmussen is reportedly using a D+3 model. I don’t think you are going to get D+3 this time around. I’ve never denied that this is a close election. But a close election will usually go to the challenger. As I said before, the undecideds have had four years to vcome to thier conclusion about Obama. What they are deciding today is whether they will go vote or not tomorrow. A majority of those who vote will vote for Romney. Even if things are statistically tied and the models are correct, the breaking undecideds will carry the day for Romney.
ferb123 wrote:
I suspect that Romney will win the popular vote but Obama will succeed in the Electoral college. If my suspicion is well founded means a nightmare four years -- for Obama and everyone else.
@ African Moondog:
I don’t see that happening. It takes a very unusual confluence of events for that to happen. From an Electoral College perspective, Romney needs to win one of the following: Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania. You have Coldwarrior’s report from Pennsylvania upthread, and I have repeated stated my reasonss for believing that Wisconsin will fall in the Romney camp. If Romney wins all his expected states and one of the three aforementioned, it will be very difficult if not impossible for Obama to pull off an Electoral College win.
@ African Moondog:
Could happen. But you won’t hear the Democrats screeching like Banshees how the election was stolen “from the people” this time around or cries to eliminate the Electoral College.
In many ways Obama should hope he does lose the election, especially if the Republicans take both houses of Congress. Because his disgraceful handling of Benghazi is something Congress is going to take up in tne new term. These are impeachable offenses (among his others) that are more egregious than anything Richard Nixon has done.
If he is no longer in office, Congress will let it go (they shouldn’t, but they will). However, Eric Holder should get no such pass.
@ Iron Fist:
BEsides, there is this:
If Romney wins the popular vote, he wins California no matter what the voters of California decide. Sweet!
African Moondog wrote:
@all
just out of curiosity. Would you support a change of the election rules, so that popular votes decide the winner?
Storagemanager wrote:
I was speaking in general that we have a natural wedge to exploit relative to sunni and shia.
Couldn’t the argument also be made that obama is enabling the shia, by looking the other way when the opposition in iran was crushed by the mullahs, and offering what amounts to lip service to iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons?
IMHO, he is enabling the advancement of islam, irregardless of the major sect.
It look’s like Dick Morris, and Scott Rassmussen have declared the race over. I guess it is.
From Canada, where I have no real information except the ‘net, I have the opinion that there is MASSIVE resentment regarding this miserable 4 year experiment of voting solely along racial lines. He is an incompetent crook. Who cares what color he is if you are hurting as a result of his commie agenda? People don’t want to be called ‘racist’, so they have learned to shut up. That doesn’t mean they aren’t angry. They will show up to vote on the ABO ticket.
@ citizen_q:
True….Obama hates both Israel and America….he supports anyone that hates us both…..but…in the end I think it is the Muslim brother he wants to win.
If Leno could say it, he might muse ‘If your middle name is ‘Hussein’, you might be a Muslim.
Israel unveils Winston Churchill bust. (I like the timing)
http://www.jpost.com/Features/InThespotlight/Article.aspx?ID=290513&R=R1
@ theoutsider:
No, but it’ll be over tomorrow night. Everything that can be done to change the polls has been done except for the get out the vote efforts. Those will be critical, I believe. We’ll win that one because we have voter enthusiasm on our side. Will you really go stand in line for four hours to vote for four more years of the same thing we’ve gotten from Obama? Four more years of high unemployment, declining labor force participation, anemic GDP growth, and disaster abroad? What has Obama done that people should be enthusiastic about him? ObamaCare? Polls show that a solid majority of the population wants it repealled.
more polls are coming…
this one sees Obama +2,
electoral college Obama 303, Romney 235
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228171/National-poll-predicts-point-popular-vote-win-Obama-electoral-college-LANDSLIDE-Mitt-Romney.html
@ ferb123:
NO! High population cities and states like CA and NY deciding what is best for the United States is even worse than a second term for the current president.
If Obama loses (Please God make it so) he may rue how
he handled Sandy.
Just doing a fly by for a photo op reflects his character but
poor political calculation.
Imo, he would have done better looking deeply involved and
presidential, letting surrogates campaign.
You can’t purchase that kind of exposure.
@ yenta-fada:
True, correct.
Canadian blogger, Scaramouche, attempts to talk about the shifting roles of Islamist factions as they radicalize:
“Not unlike the rulers they helped depose, Islamists placate the West. Not unlike those they replaced, who used the Islamists as scarecrows to keep the West by their side, the Muslim Brotherhood waves the specter of what might come next should it fail now: the Salafis who, for their part and not unlike the Brothers of yore, are torn between fealty to their traditions and the taste of power.
It’s a game of musical chairs. In Egypt, Salafis play the part once played by the Muslim Brotherhood; the Brotherhood plays the part once played by the Mubarak regime. In Palestine, Islamic Jihad is the new Hamas, firing rockets to embarrass Gaza’s rulers; Hamas, the new Fatah, claiming to be a resistance movement while clamping down on those who dare resist; Fatah, a version of the old Arab autocracies it once lambasted.
How far off is the day when Salafis present themselves to the world as the preferable alternative to jihadists?”
(From an Israeli paper)
@ bluliner10:
Agree with bluliner, here. I don’t want my vote, and my voice, to be ignored any more than they are now.
@ bluliner10:
But it will be interesting to see what California does if that unlikely event does happen. The only reason that they changed their law was because they saw the Democrat being the one on the short end of the stick. Legally, they can do tha. It’ll be interesting watching them crawfish if Romney wins the popular vote, but Obama wins the EC. Legally, they can’t do that, but I expect them to try and possibly succeed.
Storagemanager wrote:
He has been working more with the mo-bro-hoods it seems. He met a lot with regards to egypt from news reports I have read. Who knows what obama was doing that has not been reported.
Look at Benghazi. From what I have reading we were running a Mid-East version of Fast and Furious to arm the syrian opposition. The opposition to my understanding being a smorgasbord of jihadist groups many with brotherhood and al’qaida affiliations.
@ Iron Fist:
Get your friends and family out to vote, if you want to make a difference.
Don’t make me stop this bus and tell you to stop batting around the trolls. lol
@ theoutsider:
That is one thing I agree with you on. I’ve done all I can. I wish I had had the financial resources to go to Ohio and help with their get out the vote efforts, but I simply didn’t. We’ve been ate up with medical bills this year.
@ yenta-fada:
Hey, the OUtsider and I are agreeing on something. It’s a sign of the impending apocalypse. The world will end on December 12
Iron Fist wrote:
Isnt it very unfair/undemocratic if CA do this. Because CA always goes to the democrats.
Why not introducing such a law in Texas? If democrats win populate vote, but lose electoral then Texas become blue. XDDD
ferb123 wrote:
That is, really, a question that is up to the State in question under our system. The system is designed to work with the Electoral College really determining who becomes President, irrespective of the popular vote. This is a built-in safeguard against one populous section of the country dominating the entire country. By having so many electors, California already exerts too much influence on the National Election. This is California’s attempt to make themselves more central to the Presidential election. It is about sectional politics rather than Democrat vs. Republican politics. And no, California went for Ronald Reagan twice. It is only since Clinton that California has become such a steadfast Democrat stronghold.
Iron Fist wrote:
Vote for the Mormon. Maybe he’s got ‘schlep’. (Yiddish for ‘pull’ or
‘connections’.
@ Iron Fist:
but you want protest if Texas introduces such a law,dont you ???
ferb123 wrote:
Since it’ll never happen, it’s a moot point.
yenta-fada wrote:
ooh nooooooo. Vote for Obama, he will try to prevent oceans from rising (at least in this term) XDDDD
What if Gallup is right? Fo rthe Outsider, he also has a much less rosey scenario where Nate Silver is right. I doubt that seriously. Silver uses internet polls in his formulation, and those are as valid as pissing into the wind.
This is really interesting:
I take comfort in that. The pollsters, for the most part, are part of the Democrat Machine. They are going to ridiculous lengths to keep Obama competitive. If they weren’t, the picture of this race would look different. Vastly different.
Obama’s 10 biggest terror financing blunders.
http://moneyjihad.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/obamas-10-biggest-terror-finance-blunders/
Obama could earn a record share among latino voters this time
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-latino-vote-romney-colorado-nevada-virginia-florida-2012-11
Another positive view:
A slightly less rosey take than Michael Barone or George Will (let alone Dick Morris), but certainly an acceptible result. I think we are going to get the Presidency, but we’ll see what the margins look like. I am hopeful about the Senate, but I think it is a toss-up. We’ll get it if Romney wins in a landslide, though.
@ ferb123:
Latino Decisions is a bogus poll. The more reliable polls have Romney in the mid to upper 30′s.
Polls schmolls
If Obama gets it and still continues to ignore the population and not represent all reasonable Americans the pressure will mount until there is President Biden who’ll surely be all to all. Imagine another getting the Presidency beyond their wildest dreams
President Obama is going to have a good night
theoutsider wrote:
Obama has damaged your health. There are technologies on hold because of him and his playing at “engineering” green shit
Insurance!=health
Especially the expense for expensive sake kind. And all the debt is being converted from virtual monies to cold hard decades long smothering debt.
@ waldensianspirit:
IF Obama wins re-election all bets are off. It isn’t just ObamaCare. Obama will have the National Debt over $20 trillion by 2016. Given the way GDP will fall off, that’ll be pushng 1.5 times our GDP. All that needs happen to throw us into a Greece-style economic crisis is for intrest rates to increase a little. That’ll happen eventually, just because our debt-to-income ratio will be so bad. We’re done if Obama is re-elected. I don’t know what will come thereafter. That is anybody’s guess. We’ll probably break up into regional nations, but it is hard to say just how we will crash and burn, just that a crash is inevitible. The world will go back to being similar to what it was in the late 19th and early 20th Century, except with a triumphant Islam replacing Germany as the chief threat to world peace. It is not an appealing scenario, and it is being decided tomorrow.
theoutsider wrote:
and if BO wins, you’ll be celebrating your own demise…what sort of fool are you?….you want an Ophone that bad?….4 more years of liberal engineering and your shallow snark fest will be over…how much debt is too much? and by what means would you suggest to pay it off?….BO have big night, what exactly do you win?
Vote Obama and cut the throat of America…
heysoos wrote:
Exactly! The debt is going to bury this country. I’ll admit, that could happen even if Romney wins. But it assuredly will happen if Obama wins. That’s Obama’s game plan. If Obaam wins, we’ll not get the Senate, either, so Obama will continue to preside without a budget. Sequestration will hit and We’ll go merrily off the Fiscal Cliff. We could crash and burn as early as next year.
Storagemanager wrote:
That’s one reason we may get Pennsylvania. A lot of coal miners there, and those people know that t vote Obama is to vote themselves out of a job.
I predict 50 States turns into 4 regions
waldensianspirit wrote:
Obama wants all 57 states.
@ Storagemanager:
Nah, it’s a win for Israel, and civilization as a whole. The less there are, the less there are.
Storagemanager wrote:
Oh there’ll be 7 interstitial places like Dearborn
If I were a bookmaker, I would want people to LOSE. Therefore, I would be trying to convince folks to bet on Obama for a win, make him the odds on favorite, and then make serious bank when Romney wins.
Storagemanager wrote:
He did say that he had one more to go.
Must be the Midwestern State of Oceania or the
Coastal State of East Illinois.
“He strides above us like a god.”
momcat wrote:
Well, if you were to ask this question at AOSHQ, I can guarantee you the answer would be Valu-Rite vodka, and pudding.
@ waldensianspirit:
Could be. The Old South, the Left Coast, the Northeast, and something in the middle section? Most of the Old West will go with the Old South. We are more akin than not. The Northeast might form some kind of confederation with the Left Coast. These are the Debtor States, really. You can add Illinois to that. I think it’ll be a split based on fiscal soundness, with the Solvent States splitting off from the Debtor States. That’ll happen over the question of whether to bail out one of the big debtor states like California or Illinois. That what I think will happen, anyway. There is no reason for the Solvent States of America to allow themselves to be plundered to bail out the prolifigate states like California, or, especially, their nutso public employees pension systems.
father_of_10 wrote:
Bingo! Why would you trust a bookmaker to tell you the truth about something that you were planning to bet on? Do you ask your bookmaker to recommend your horses at the track, too? It is a foolish datapoint. One hat underscores the overall unseriousness of Ferb.
@ momcat:
Bacon-wrapped shrimp and a nice glass or a couple of wine, perhaps.
@ Iron Fist:
That’s very much along the lines I’m seeing. And no joke the interstitials are gonna be painful thorn to their neighbors for the duration of the nations Farrakhan’s Nation included
@ waldensianspirit:
I can see that. We’ve imported too many Muslims. We even have a colony here in Tennessee, though it has been resisted by the local population. If everything breaks up, they won’t find themselves welcome around these parts. By much of anyone. They’ll need to migrate to Dearbornistan, and settle in their own Shariia-State hellhole.
New Thread
@ Iron Fist:
Fist, alas from what I understand this is not so. Doriangray can explain.
@ Carolina Girl:
K. I figured they’d have backed off from this the moment that they thought they might help elect a Republican rather than a Democrat.