Roxeanne De Luca at Da Tech Guy’s Blog has the story:
Pointing out the obvious: we don’t have to sit around and take it
Stacy McCain has a great post up about the “bizarre statistical improbabilities” of Obama winning over 99% of the vote in some districts that also have over 100% turnout.
We can complain about voter fraud and sound like a bunch of conspiracy theorists and/or sore losers, or we can prove voter fraud and thwart it in the future.
Let’s talk about thwarting voter fraud. Indiana has one of those nifty photo-ID laws (which also helps the poor, in that the state gives free photo IDs to those who cannot afford them). Work to get one in your state. Remember, we swept state legislatures and governorships in 2010, and continued to pick up governorships in 2012. We have friendly legislatures and friendly executive offices.
If you aren’t able to get “show ID to vote” laws passed, why not try to lobby for the low-tech, tried-and-true purple finger approach? Sure, it won’t eliminate absentee voter fraud, but people will have to work a lot harder to commit voter fraud if they can only vote once on Election Day.
Troops, those are your marching orders. Get it done in your states.
Now, the tedium of proving voter fraud. What you need to do is prove that people who voted do not actually exist, do not live in the district, or are otherwise ineligible to vote (e.g. are not citizens).
[...]
Click HERE to learn how to gather the evidence to prove vote fraud.
Admittedly, purple fingers are just a start.
- Paper ballots are an absolute requirement. Electronic voting systems cannot be made secure.
- Early voting is a bad idea from the get-go.In those states that allow early voting, the ink used for the purple finger must be so difficult to remove that detectable traces will remain from the first early voting day through the election day itself. That would be the only way to put a stop to the “vote early and often” scenario.We still need many, many other measures to combat election fraud, including better auditing and counting of all ballots (especially absentee ballots), safeguards for military voters, and forfeiture of political offices gained via any form of election fraud. There should definitely be prison time for anyone who submits an absentee ballot and then casts a second vote in person at a precinct polling place.
- Even with the purple finger, we must continue to work for voter ID laws in every State. We must fight back against all attempts to insinuate that we are using voter ID laws to disenfranchise people. Whenever our opposition comes up with that one rare individual who is obviously American born but who cannot get a valid ID because of some bizarre paperwork error, we must insist that State legislators enact legislation to resolve that individual’s particular problem in a timely manner, and not use him or her as a pawn in the vote fraud game.
Tags: Election Fraud, purple finger, vote fraud
“you can judge a culture by the honesty of their election process”
Heysoos The First
WASS*
*We Are So Screwed
Early voting is fine when system is working perfectly on normal election day. That means normal elections with zero frauds. When that has been accomplished, early voting is good convenience and can be monitored by the very same system that monitors the normal voting.
My state has already voter I.D. …
So they are calling for the killing of white people???? The insanity since the election is mind-boggling.
new-black-panther-leader-obamas-bombed-black-and-brown-people-but-hasnt-killed-one-white-man-yet
For some reason I don’t think voting with a purple finger is going to work here. The system is rather broke and not all states will go for it.
@ Lily:
@ Lily:
BO killed 4 white guys in Libya recently, you ignorant simp
@ Lily:
he is such a punk.
@ Lily:
Link….darn it.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/14/new-black-panther-leader-obamas-bombed-black-and-brown-people-but-hasnt-killed-one-white-man-yet/
@ heysoos:
Apparently that wasn’t enough or he didn’t get the memo about what happened in Benghazi.
coldwarrior wrote:
Yes indeed he is a punk. Just sickening too.
Unbelievable…still going on about abortions…so which side is really on the social-con agenda??? The leftists.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/14/dnc-chief-wasserman-schultz-tells-pro-abortion-fanatics-we-have-to-double-down-in-2014/
@ heysoos:
That’s just what I was thinking -- four dead men in Libya would beg to differ. Of course, we won’t be hearing from anyone how this is a raaaacist bunch of thugs, oh no, nuttin’ like dat.
Which always tells me that they don’t believe any of the violent racist crap any of them spew about the TEA Party or the NRA. Because they’d be too damned afraid the raaaacist violent Jim Crow hicks would come after them.
@ Lily:
Debbie wants Nancy’s job and is probably no doubt pissed as hell that Nazi Nancy isn’t stepping aside to give it to her.
Greetings & salutations.
Hey, if you are looking for a good movie, “Argo”
A really well done, gut wrenching flick.
RIX wrote:
Aside from the opening.
When Obama wins his last election, hurrah, hurrah!
He’ll have lots more flexibility then, hurrah, hurrah!
The men will cheer, the boys will shout
At the hundred-and-ten-percent turnout
And folks will wed gay when Barack Obama wins!
Get ready to come into your own, hurrah! hurrah!
Everybody gets a free Obamaphone™—hurrah! hurrah!
Who cares about the economy?
We all are living off EBT
We’ll loll around all day when Barack Obama wins!
For sexual diseases we don’t care, hurrah! hurrah!
We’ve got abortions and Obamacare, hurrah! hurrah!
Though it’s like going to the DMV
Whoever’s paying, it isn’t me
We can wait all day, since Barack Obama wins!
Who cares about the financial cliff? hurrah! hurrah!
The doomsayers are a bunch of stiffs! hurrah! hurrah!
They print more currency day and night
To ensure that we will be all right
We’ll piss it all away, now Barack Obama wins!
Carolina Girl wrote:
What a freak choice there. Of course San Fran Nan isn’t going to step down.
Carolina Girl wrote:
I brawled all through my early adult years and beyond…tough talk doesn’t do anything to intimidate me
@ buzzsawmonkey:
your brain must race a mile a minute…how do you sleep bro?…
excellent
lobo91 wrote:
Yeah, the opening was a little weird.
But it is a really good flick.
At his presser today BHO got all bent out of
shape that Susan Rice is under scrutiny for
her remarks about Benghazi.
He claims that as the UN Ambassador she had nothing
to do with any of it.
Yet, they sent out to five Sunday morning programs
with the bull shit story.
Why is that?
RIX wrote:
Isn’t that the Affleck film which is all about “Hollywood saves lives!”?
@ RIX:
Didn’t he say blame me? Plus it was the White House that sent Susan Rice out the Sunday after? Obama has no fear of the hearings about Benghazi in the least bit. I wonder why? Arrogance? Or he knows something everyone else doesn’t know.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
The very one, but for Affleck it is pretty patriotic
& the Hollywood twist is very clever.
RIX wrote:
Given that none of the hostages in Teheran died—that includes those who were not smuggled out as Canadians pretending to be a bogus film crew—it sounds to me as though this “patriotic film” is about the overwhelming incompetence of US intelligence and covert operations, and about minimizing, if not sloughing, the terror that bandit mobs once had of the US, in favor of aggrandizing the brilliant deus-ex-machina saviorship of Hollywood (and, of course, dismissing the mullahs’ terror of Reagan).
Of course, not yet having seen the film, I could be wrong.
The arrogance of this man is off the charts…..I wonder how the people feel not the president.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/14/obama-praises-his-response-to-hurricane-sandy-its-been-aggressive-strong-fast-and-robust/
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I get your apprehension about the film.
Actually it glorifies Tony Menedez, the CIA Agent who pulled it off.
Our Marines & the Canadian Ambassador come across great.
And the movie ruse that they used was brilliant.
See Argo, you will enjoy it.
@ RIX:
I’ll take your recommendation seriously.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I may be overselling , & I don’t want you to expect too much.
But it is a good movie.
RIX wrote:
I haven’t been to a new commercial film in some time. I may make an exception.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Most of the Hollywood product isn’t worth seeing.
This movie is an exception.
See y’all later.
I don’t do movies, I don’t support people that hate me…
Hollywood could fall off the map, I could care less….Hollywood before a certain time is okay with me…now, they can be run over by a garbage truck, don’t give a rats ass
Lily wrote:
Because it doesn’t count anymore whatever Petraeus will say. He is ultimately discredited. No one left to speak the truth after this soap opera.
Guggi wrote:
Just because Petraeus got his dick caught in a mousetrap doesn’t mean he isn’t capable of speaking the truth regarding other matters.
@ heysoos:
In many ways, that’s what conservatives need to do -- not attend movies designed to smear America and conservatives and the GOP — look at that piece of crap “Lions for Lambs” -- died miserably at the box office. I think Brian DePalma did a hate America movie that also flopped. Americans do not like to see movies slandering the armed forces. I believe even though “Hurt Locker” got the Oscar, it was not a pro-forces movie IIRC so didn’t do well.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
agreed…his testimony might be priceless…all these predictions are boring…wait and see what he says
For anyone who is interested in some US-budget history
(pdf-file)
and another interesting book from the same author, Henry Hazlitt: The Conquest of Poverty (free download from Mises Institute)
Carolina Girl wrote:
it’s all make believe…I’m fed up with make believe…it’s ruined our country
Guggi wrote:
Will Petraeus even have the back-bone to even to tell the truth now? He has nothing to lose…now that obama has let the hammer fall…oh but he didn’t see that coming because he went with the obama administration meme about Benghazi…he actually trusted obama not to let the hammer fall after the election the man is a damn fool.
hey ya’ll
got a double crust pizza in the oven, a cold one of these in my hand, my new favorite beer of the
week,…errr.. monthand I’ve only had to work at one job today whoo hooo!
anything interesting happen today?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Excatly. He thought if he went along with obama’s meme about Benghazi he could just retire quietly if he did what they wanted him to do. Now that they have crushed him (not to mention he did this to himself he should have known better what a dolt) …what is he going to do?
Lily wrote:
I guess he has still a lot to lose.
Lily wrote:
I think he does…he appears to not be a chronic womanizer and this was his one gig, I’ll give him that at this point…I think he’ll tell the truth as he knows it…I’m a softie like that, give the guy a chance to explain what he knows, then kill him (Ghengis Khan)
Guggi wrote:
Not much after the total smear campaign…is he going to tell the truth now??? /I’m not all that sure he will tell the truth in fact I’d be more surprised if he did.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Whatever he will say one side will say it’s a lie because O./government can still humiliate him even more than they have already done and the other side will say it’s only a revenge because they didn’t protect him and his job.
He has lost all credibility even if he is saying the truth.
Lily wrote:
why wouldn’t he tell the truth?
Petraeus will stick to the script
he lied once,he’s not about to change his story now
@ Lily:
aka the BBB!
Guggi wrote:
I disagree…he’s finished, at least he can do is clear the air…if I’m wrong it will by by his own words, not speculation on a blog
@ heysoos:
Not sure..I don’t think him having a affair makes whatever he says not the truth..but will he tell the truth? He seemed to have been black-mailed into thinking if he went along with the obama’s administration meme..he could quietly exit stage left…didn’t happen.
Guggi wrote:
telling ? speaking ?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/1114/Angus-King-of-Maine-helps-Senate-tilt-toward-Democrats
Here’s why we can never trust a f-ing independent. They are actually democrats in disguise.
Olympia Snowe was no benefit to us, but at least she would vote our way once in a while. This assclown ran as an independent and is going to be a demonrat.
Lily wrote:
right, that was then…the sitrep has evolved fast, he’s Airborne, he will revert back to simpler times…bet me
Lily wrote:
one would think that someone with that much military experience has a backup plan… we shall see.
Guggi wrote:
Not unless he can send them down the path of truth or have some evidence or anything.
Someone will have to back up what he says if he doesn’t just plead the 5th and say nothing.
heysoos wrote:
Why lots of reasons….one: obama
rain of lead wrote:
And there is is..he lied once already.
@ Lily:
PIMF = It Is
I would like Petraeus to take the Samson route. As Samson pulled down the temple of Dagon he said, “Let me die with the Philistines.”
@ heysoos:
Apparently you under-estimate the obama administration a lot.
rain of lead wrote:
Obituary: Ahmed Said Khalil al-Jabari, Hamas commander
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Indeed.
I don’t trust high ranking military at all. While I was in I realized they are nothing but political tools. All he will do is stick to the script and sign off on a ghost written book once he’s retired. The book will continue to parrot the admins story and will be declared incredible by the NYT book section and they will rave about the “revalations” in the book that will be nothing more than more O ass kissing.
Mars wrote:
Corrected my error.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
See here.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
/sooo, you like to play with rockets, eh?
Guggi wrote:
Telling the truth. He didn’t the first time because basically he was being black-mailed and apparently he believed if he did what he was told to do all would be okay and he could get on with his life…big mistake for ever believing the obama administration for one. Now on the revenge ..oh hell yeah believe that obama is going to bring revenge to Americans..now there obama is telling the truth.
heysoos wrote:
Bullshit. He was bought and bought is exactly how he will remain. He has no honor to protect he flushed it down the toilet long ago.
heysoos wrote:
No..not putting money on that. Never under-estimate obama…he seems waaaaaaaay too confident here concerning the Benghazi.
Lily wrote:
it depends on what the meaning of is, is
@ Lily:
@ Lily:
the whole point of the exercise is to find where BO’s loyalty lies and if the general supports BO to the dire end…non of this is clearcut yet and any prediction is just that…we need a detailed testimony and if he agrees to give it then cut him some slack…if it goes bad or him that’s a different story
brookly red wrote:
I would hope so…all we need is just one..ONE Patriot ….and then the rest might follow and stand up and the house of cards will fall. Not sure what his B plan is …stay safe and continue the charade or actually stand up and tell the truth.
Lily wrote:
he is way too confident period.
heysoos wrote:
Obama’s loyalty begins and ends with himself.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
There’s a novel idea…one can only hope. But when it concerns anything with obama ..I cannot predict what will happen.
doriangrey wrote:
Yep.
Allen’s gotta go and might as well bring the troops home
rain of lead wrote:
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
yes, but he has to have a very few people close to him to shield him…we should find out regarding the general soon enough
Lily wrote:
It won’t be a patriot (well one acting out of patriotism anyway) that brings O down. Libs suffer from the sin of envy (hence the class warfare) it will be a scorned and jeleaous insider.
heysoos wrote:
You are misreading me. I’m not demonizing the General (he did that himself with the affair)..but I don’t see him doing what he needs to do and tell the truth. I just don’t. Obama is waaaaaaay too confident concerning these hearings and has the General’s balls in a vice. I see it for what it is…he lied the first time and he will stick to that lie. By all means I hope he doesn’t but I don’t see him standing up to obama.
brookly red wrote:
Indeed..and so far there is something to that confidence..I would have never thought he would be re-elected. The man is teflon. Never seen anything like it before concerning a politician.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Always and he will do anything to mantain that too. Screw the country just as long as he is okay.
heysoos wrote:
I don’t know there have been rumors before about cheating his wife.
heysoos wrote:
The general already showed were his loyality lays..with obama …he lied the first time. You think he is going to re-cant? I don’t.
By all means I hope he does..put really that is a fairy tale.
You know what would be refereshing?
For David Petraeus to stand up before Congress in a public forum and say, “The last time I spoke to this body I had my dick caught in a mousetrap. I am now going to tell you the full, unvarnished truth—about Benghazi, about what the President did and did not do, about what the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense did and did not do, about what I did and did not do, and what I and what they knew. My honor is besmirched, and the only way I can clear my honor is to tell what I know.”
Lily wrote:
ever have a teflon fry pan? they are freaking fantastic until the teflon gets one tiny nick…
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
dream on
brookly red wrote:
Well obama has certainly scorned a lot of people and nothing has come from that…who knows someone, anyone needs to expose this fraud of a president. But you may be right. Who knows…
Lily wrote:
/you know lying and cheating are resume enhancers for dems…this may all be just a set up to run him in 2016
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
While it would in fact be refreshing, it is exactly what will not happen.
Guggi wrote:
Hey, I said it would be refreshing. I didn’t say I expected it to happen.
Lily wrote:
well one has to get caught and plea bargin, same as in the private sector.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Now that would be good….let congress know he was being black-mailed and then spill his guts about the whole horrid thing.
Guggi wrote:
There, fixed that for ya!
Of course, if Petraeus did indeed say what I dreamed of him saying above, I suspect that Congress would be furious—because then it would mandate that they take action against the bandit occupier in the White House, and they would not welcome that in the slightest.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
that’s why I said “dream on”
brookly red wrote:
Ah yes ….if you happen to burn something on telfon might as well trash the pan. I see where you are going here. Even telfon has it’s weaknesses.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Isn’t that the truth…they have been letting obama get away with anything.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
BINGO… On the other hand… if we made it a pay per view event, we could probably pay off the national debt as folks watched their favorite politician’s head explode… Over and over and over again…
Guggi wrote:
Hey sometimes Dreams can come true!
doriangrey wrote:
Oh hell yes….obama likes to be on TV….let this happen live on TV him being taken down from his imaginary god-like throne.
The best we can hope for with this administration is a pissed off leftists who feels O hasn’t given them the acclaim/position/bribes they deserve.
Liberals love their vengeance.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I for one would love to see an all out war break out between the Orcs of Mordor on the Potomac and the Chicago Orcs. That would really make my day…
Mars wrote:
I’m pretty sure that’s what yesterday’s White House meeting with MoveOn and the unions was about.
Now that the election’s over, they want him to stop being so conservative.
Lily wrote:
don’t think for a moment they aren’t looking for a chink in the armor… and you never know where you will find one.
heh
just gave the girl a lession in how to plunge a toilet
teachable moment in how to deal with lifes shitty issues
Mars wrote:
Indeed…but even before the leftists thought he wasn’t doing enough yet still voted for him. Strange people. People are strange now days.
rain of lead wrote:
WOW…how odd…husband just had a moment with sons toilet too…
/odd…
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
you know that is a pretty good chance right there
brookly red wrote:
I have been wondering about that. At first I thought well they are waiting for the election and let the people take care of it ..so they will not have to deal with obama and appear racist. But now …now what are they going to do? He has made enemies with the democrats and the Republicans. So what are they going to do about this occupier of the White House.
@ rain of lead:
@ Lily:
well the powers that be are telling us we don’t need a tea party we need a plunger party
@ brookly red:
can you find a plunger the size of the superdome?
brookly red wrote:
Apparently we need to plunge the toilet that is D.C. now doesn’t it?
/I don’t believe in coincidences this is a omen.
LOL!
BTW—one of the reasons I said it would be “refreshing” in my #89 for Petraeus to stand up and say what I suggested is, that I would like to see if the Big Shot Generals actually believe in any of that “honor” stuff that the military is supposed to be about.
rain of lead wrote:
If you build it …people will come.
Lily wrote:
same thing they do with any well connected criminal, go after the underlings till one cracks and implicates the boss… fast and furious has not gone away that may be angel. bengazi, maybe… all it could take is one slip up.
rain of lead wrote:
Newark?
Lily wrote:
Stimulis the remix… plunger ready jobs
Bad to worse.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/14/israel-says-jihadist-rebels-in-syria-now-control-almost-the-entire-border/
lobo91 wrote:
I’m positive. The union thugs are going to be pressing him hard as hell for full nationalization of industry.
brookly red wrote:
So far that slip hasn’t occurred and I tired of waiting on it. But I hope it comes soon.
@ Mars:
Apparently, someone asked Trumka what they discussed, and he said that they told Obama not to even think about any cuts to entitlement programs.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I concur where is this so called *honor*?
Mars wrote:
A Bad moon is rising..isn’t it?
lobo91 wrote:
So thugs are telling obama what to do? Wow …just groovy isn’t it?
lobo91 wrote:
Oh I’m sure that’s part of it.
Funny thing is that by all rights the unions shouldn’t have any interest at all in getting entitlements expanded and increased.
Yet since they are totally controlled by the international marxists they have to do this crap.
By the way, where did Trumka get his mustache? Do they have a shop called Stalins Mustache?
@ brookly red:
Mars wrote:
/were gonna party like its 1917
Lily wrote:
Since day one.
Lily, trust me when I say you should go to the Freedom Center website and get one of their booklets. Once you get one they keep sending you free ones.
That is the only place I’ve found that sends material that is willing to connect ALL the dots.
@ Mars:
The Freedom Center?
Oh I had figured that the thugs were behind obama since day one. He doesn’t hide it all that well.
brookly red wrote:
I think what drives me crazy is the fact they do this over and over again.
Everyone should read again Mussolinis planks of facism. What is the difference between that and what the dems have forced on us over the last century?
@ Mars:
This one?
http://www.horowitzfreedomcenter.org/
Lily wrote:
And, while Lenin read a book on Marx the quartet practiced in the park, and…
We sang dirges in the dark the day the music died
We were singing, bye bye Miss American Pie…
brookly red wrote:
Amazing how history repeats itself….
Lily wrote:
http://www.horowitzfreedomcenter.org/
https://secure.donationreport.com/productlist.html?key=5DGIXYHTRFJI
That’s the pamphlet link. They are really worth it. The last one I got was about the Muslim Brotherhoods huge infiltration of the O admin.
Mars wrote:
And, as I watched him on the stage my hands were clenched in fists of rage
No angel born in Hell could break that satan’s spell
And, as the flames climbed high into the night to light the sacrificial rite, I saw…
Satan laughing with delight the day the music died
@ brookly red:
@ Mars:
Got a link for that??
@ Mars:
Will do on the pamplets …I knew about the Muslim Brotherhood …especially when obama took them off the list of terrorist groups..I went WTH? They are the head of all terrorist groups. I know also how welcome they are to the White House.
Mars wrote:
that is nonsense, the word infiltration implys they were not welcomed with open arms…
brookly red wrote:
No, no, Senor! Las palabras son,
Buy, buy Mesoamerican pie…
@ Lily:
Who do you think owns their party?
Lily wrote:
and that is disturbing… the other night we mused at the petitions to succeed. but there are 10s of millions of people that fear this administration’s intent. I just don’t see this ending peaceably
Lily wrote:
Didn’t Bush host them after 9/11? And sent CAIR to teach the CIA and FBI on how to be sensitive to Muslims?
ROPMA
lobo91 wrote:
Thugs. They aren’t all that good on hiding it this time around.
@ Lily:
That’s because they aren’t trying to.
Rancher wrote:
The Muslim Brotherhood? Don’t know …maybe CAIR…I think the Muslim Brotherhood was still on the terrorist watch list then. But I could be wrong. But I do believe it was Obama who took them off the terrorist watch list.
brookly red wrote:
Have you looked at the map now of the states that want to secede? Texas got the amount of votes and so does Louisiana. They have the map on Drudge. I have never seen anything like it.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/14/white-house-secede-petitions-reach-660000-signatures-50-state-participation/#ixzz2CFgOEC14
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
For what?
brookly red wrote:
How he got re-elected is beyond belief. Really it is. Oh one could say this or that..or that other thing over there. But it is truly unbelievable.
@ Lily:
I think CAIR is now actually running the FBI.
It was simpler that way.
@ Lily:
It depends on the meaning of “re-elected”…
@ Lily:
Plus I am sure those numbers are growing daily….and the number they have is already old.
@ Mars:
For the Freedom Center. But I see that was later posted by L. Thanks anyway…
lobo91 wrote:
True. Like stolen?
@ Lily:
You’re catching on.
brookly red wrote:
I should have said infestation.
lobo91 wrote:
No they aren’t even trying to hide it..and our media cloaks it. Treasonous.
/does that word have any meaning anymore?
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
I also posted the link directly to the pamphlets.
@ Lily:
I think it means “someone who eats at Chik-fil-a” now.
//
Lily wrote:
not stolen, bribed fair and square
lobo91 wrote:
Actually I think you are correct. Isn’t there anyone saying anything about this??? Anyone?
@ Lily:
Only people who eat at Chik-fil-a.
lobo91 wrote:
I kinda got that impression when they were calling states for obama with 0% reporting in. Now that was a red flag there if there ever was one.
brookly red wrote:
No, I’m pretty sure that a good portion of it was stolen, too.
brookly red wrote:
Stolen, bribed, votes for Romney went to obama..it’s a mixed soup.
@ Lily:
That didn’t bother me. They only did that with states where everyone knew what the outcome would be.
Now, the fact that there are still 300,000 uncounted ballots in Ohio, where the margin of victory was a little over 100,000 votes bothers me.
lobo91 wrote:
Or if they want to secede from the United States.
But most certianly if you eat at Chik-fil-a.
Lily wrote:
Or if you eat at Papa Johns on this Friday.
@ Lily:
When it comes to stealing elections, the Democrats are professionals.
They’ve been perfecting their technique for 150 years, after all.
lobo91 wrote:
Well that is troublesome there. What bothered me also is the votes that were cast for Romney went to obama..or NBP still watching over voting sites or murals of obama at voting sites.
lobo91 wrote:
I can see that..now how do we correct it..there is the question.
Lily wrote:
I think you might be right, I might have gotten the meet and greet Obama had with them mixed up with Bush’s freedom agenda. Bush pressured Mubarak and Israel to open up their elections more and the MB made gains in Egypt’s parliament and Hamas got elected in Gaza. He also coined the Religion of Peace crap. I used to think Islam could exist with democracy and used Turkey as an example. Then I saw where Turkey was headed, watched the cartoon riots, etc. and realized I was being naive. However the Republican establishment still thinks it can work.
New Thread.
@ Lily:
It’s really too bad that we don’t have a group of people who could go out and look at things like that, and write stories about them so that the rest of us would know what’s going on, isn’t it?
I know it’s a radical concept…
@ Rancher:
Hell, the Republican establishment still believes that democracy can coexist with Democrats.
Rancher wrote:
Let’s also not forget that the man heading the fight on fiscal responsibility on the right may be in the pocket of the Muslim Brotherhood too.
lobo91 wrote:
Oh you mean like in the old days when reporter’s would actually report the news? That is too radical lobo waaaaaaaay too radical!
@ Lily:
That “press conference” today was a disgrace.
Ruh roh…looks like Fox News didn’t get the memo.
Here’s the top headline on their site:
Rice Had ‘Nothing to Do’ With Libya,
So Why Was She Asked to Explain?
Funny…I had that exact same thought about 3 seconds after Obama said that.
How come nobody asked him about it?
Mars wrote:
Lindsey Grahm? McCain? Who are you refering too?
@ Rancher:
Grover Norquist
@ lobo91:
How about the reporter that congratulated Obama on his victory?
She went on to say she has seen all of his victories and closed her
eyes the only time that he lost.
Pat Cadell is right about the Media, they are the enemy of the
American people.
lobo91 wrote:
Ah yes, he worked for them.
@ RIX:
I loved the way he told them to leave Rice alone and go after him if they had questions about Benghazi.
And then Ed Henry asked him a question about it and he got all indignant.
Rancher wrote:
And his wife is a Muslim.
Speaking of Norquist maybe I was thinking of Suhail Khan when I said Bush had MB at the White House, he actually worked there or something.
lobo91 wrote:
Obama was trying to come across all heroic. He is a fraud.
I don’t care about Petreaus having a girl friend.
I want to know why those guys weren’t rescued in Benghazi.
@ RIX:
Well, Obama says he’s responsible.
Just don’t actually ask him any questions about it or anything.
lobo91 wrote:
@ 73 heysoos: It will be the time where Petraeus gets to set the record straight and is he just a company man to the end or is he a man for the country. One legacy is big the other very very small.
@ lobo91: I guess she was asked to explain because she had noting to do with it. lol on obama
Rancher wrote:
Grover Norquist.
lobo91 wrote:
Didn’t notice you already answered. Sorry.
lobo91 wrote:
I have been on a jury before and sounds like a a confession to me.
rain of lead wrote:
I’m late to the party but one reason for him not to lie is that he will be under oath this time. On top of everything else, the last thing he needs is a perjury charge.
livefreeor die wrote:
Presidential pardons all around. Step right up, buy your pardon. We take all major credit cards, cash, blood, souls, and loyalty.
@ Mars:
Speaking of which, the person most bummed out by Obama’s winning reelection-Mumia!
@ livefreeor die:
Heh.
livefreeor die wrote:
Why? He’s a state prisoner. Obama can’t pardon him.
@ lobo91:
I thought he was Federal. My bad.
livefreeor die wrote:
Nope. He killed a local cop.
Sounds good. I am too cynical to believe it will ever happen. Why, it would racist!