Blogmocracy in Action
Guest Blogger: Macduff
What Americans must understand is that the Democrats don’t simply want to defeat Republicans, they want to kill and bury us as a party then salt the Earth where we once thrived…and they won’t rest until that has been accomplished. They will lie, cheat, steal and have no qualms against permanently slandering a good man’s reputation, as we saw in this cycle, to get what they want. We’ve had nasty politics in this country since our founding, but instantaneous modern communication, the inherent vulnerability of electronic voting systems and “data mining”, which the Obama campaign almost pioneered, and definitely perfected (to the delight of Democrats, everywhere), “nasty” has been raised to a level heretofore unknown.
This isn’t about simple mudslinging, it’s about permanent scarlet letters tattooed upon the foreheads of anyone who dares to oppose them. There are those who advocate our descent into the muck and matching them handful for handful, but I’m not convinced that’d work, even if I could convince myself to support a candidate who could excel at such woeful behavior. The Obama campaign ran one of the most vile, negative campaigns in memory, then had the temerity to tag Romney’s campaign as negative….and it stuck!
We can talk all we want about the “messiah” schtick, and it’s absolutely pivotal, but we must talk about how he was able to sell that schtick in the first place as well as the gullibility and low self-esteem of the majority of voters that bought it two cycles in a row.
This isn’t a problem so much with Republicans as it is with the American electorate. Yeah, we’ve had some real duds, but the Democrats haven’t exactly been producing stellar examples of statesmanship either (Elizabeth Warren? Really?). Hell, Obama himself is an urban myth (and yes, I meant that just the way it sounds), wrapped around a set of grievances and sold as a savior — and people not only bought it, they practical pee on themselves in his presence!
We’re definitely in “Brave New World” territory here — with the country in shambles, demonstrably worse than when he took over, no president should have been reelected. Again, ascribing this phenomenon to the messiah schtick is only half of the problem, even “messiahs” need loyal followers and in this case, they’re the real issue.
(Cross Posted @The Weeks Review)
Tags: American Pharoah, God-King Obama, MacDuff
This post dovetails beautifully with the entire winning the culture meme being posited all over this blog so far. You’re absolutely correct in your observations.
Everything that has transpired over the last 15 months has been related to us losing the cultural war, and not at all to do with any political arguments. That’s not to say that we necessarily would have won a political debate, but the other side refused to meet us on those grounds. They beat us in the war we wouldn’t fight.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Yes and now their will pay the price, grow up and rebel against their values (or in this case the lack of them) and the cycle continues…
brookly red wrote:
the ‘young’ during the 20′s were derided…
Flyovercountry wrote:
Thank you and yes, it the two segway rather nicely! Contemporary pop culture will always push the envelope, and culture, in general tends to always evolve toward liberalism, but what’s happening now is increasingly slovenly and disconnected to reality.
I made a point that, in constantly pegging the Outrage-O-Meter, Obama has succeeded in desensitizing the public -- once you peg the meter, everything else is invisible.
It’s like living among zombies. Seriously.
The problem in 2012 was the American electorate.
@ Storagemanager:
Someone in the Vatican needs to muzzle that Jew hating idiot.
yenta-fada wrote:
ASAP.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Fighting a culture war is a losing battle (I cringe whenever O’Reilly goes on his “Culture Warrior” shtick). We need to co-opt as much of it as we can. Putting down (or deriding) music, movies, TV et al is a stupid, stupid, stupid idea.The culture may be debased but it could never have gotten that bad without the approval or collaboration of a great part of the public. Buchannan’s “Culture War” speech at the 1992 R.N.C.was the death knell for the Republican Party in so many geographic areas that they used to be competitive in. We have lost the popular vote in 5 out of the lsat 6 elections and we better start understanding why.
@ yenta-fada:
He’s done.
@ Speranza:
That was the most disastrous speech ever.
Flyovercountry wrote:
Something Iran is expecting to do, too.
@ Flyovercountry:
These posts are complimenting each other.
MacDuff wrote:
kinda like the big lie…
yenta-fada wrote:
He can kiss our ass.
@ MacDuff:
Great post!
Speranza wrote:
there are shit-heads in every organization.
@ MacDuff:
Mac, great post.
The SEIU disrupted travelers getting to the terminal
at LAX today. Many missed their flights.
The issue is that the employees of a company with
a contract with LAX voted down the SEIU.
So, they brought in 1,000 SEIU thugs that have nothing
to do with the airport to punish travelers.
Speranza wrote:
The problem was not the speech; the problem was that Buchanan was blowing a bunch of hot air at the wrong time and in the wrong place.
You don’t make policy at a convention, in any meaningful way. Buchanan should have been working with other Republicans to fight the culture war—if he wanted to aid the conservative cause—and kept his mouth shut at the convention.
In other words, the problem was that Buchanan made a speech when he should have been taking action beforehand and afterwards and keeping his mouth shut.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
It doesn’t help that Buchanan is a National Socialist scumbag.
Rodan wrote:
Combine that with nice guy block head Dan Quayle running against a TV character named “Murphy Brown” and you can see why the GOP is referred to as “The Stupid Party”.
@ coldwarrior:
He’s done, he’ll be removed.
So, Obama “pardoned the Turkey” by making the sign of the cross.
Erdogan was not amused.
MacDuff wrote:
Indeed it is. The way I see it the Russians in 1917 thought they were the ones they had been waiting for too… it took awhile but they got over it. Someday we will too.
@ Speranza:
Dan Quayle admitted it was a mistake. Yeah thanks buddy. What’s crazy is that Bush and Quayle didn’t even believe that shit.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
The speech was vapid and stupid. A call for a return to the 1950′s TV era which really never existed except on T.V. When you cannot run on your economic record (unless you are Barack Obama) you are toast. GHW BUsh allowing that neo-fascist to have a speaking role at the convention was another example of how he pandered to the yahoo crowd.
@ Speranza:
@ RIX:
@ coldwarrior:
@ MacDuff:
We are still living with the consequences of the 92 election.
Well the Hospital sent mom home today, they said that her heart is stronger now than it was last year and everything look really good. Now I just have to make sure she doesn’t forget to take her diuretics.
Rodan wrote:
Talk about pouring fuel on a fire…
92 was 20 years ago. A whole generation has been raised viewing Republicans as cranky scolds.
@ doriangrey:
Good to hear. My prayers are with her!
Rodan wrote:
yep…the pope wont put up with that.
doriangrey wrote:
Keep your eye on her.
@ yenta-fada:
I’d drop him in Gaza let him see what Hamas thinks of Christians. Just ask the Pali Christians they kicked out.
Rodan wrote:
shit, were still living with the consequences of the 63 election.
Speranza wrote:
No disagreement there.
My point, however, is that the culture war is real, and it must be joined—but making a speech at a convention, which leads to no action and to no policy, but merely puts rhetoric out there on which you can be attacked, is the stupidest and least effective way to do it.
If Buchanan had been serious about “the culture war” he would have been fighting it before and after the convention by trying to change things in the schools and the media and keeping his fat mouth shut. He was not serious, however—he was merely being an extremely destructive blowhard.
Rodan wrote:
Correctamundo.
doriangrey wrote:
excellent!
hctz or lasix
Rodan wrote:
And it gets worse,, not better.
@ coldwarrior:
@ yenta-fada:
@ Speranza:
Want to bet this clown is Liberation Theology aka Jesuit?
coldwarrior wrote:
INDEED!
@ Speranza:
The crazy part is the GOP is the party of liberty. That’s what is ironic.
Gotta run all!
Rodan wrote:
He profanes the sacred collar he wears.
Rodan wrote:
“Escape from Freedom” written in 1941 by Erich Fromm is still very prescient. People prefer handouts to freedom.
doriangrey wrote:
That is great news! Popping a pill or so should be easy for her.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
well if you want to win the “culture war” methinks you gotta start by bringing down the teachers union first.
Speranza wrote:
some people do. others will wander 40 years in the wilderness. i prefer to judge mankind the best not the average, but that is just me.
See ya.
@ Speranza:
Not sure if you’ve gotten my points or not. In your post, you’ve both agreed and simultaneously disagreed with what I’ve said. I do not want to do what Bill O’Riley has done, mostly because I am in no way a fan of his. My point is to start grabbing onto these tactics and marrying them with our message instead. Not fighting against the culture, but embracing our own culture and showing why it is better to live in a free society than as a slave. There is a difference here, and it is an important one.
coldwarrior wrote:
lasix
@ Rodan:
@ RIX:
Thanks.
doriangrey wrote:
glad to hear the good knews dorian.
doriangrey wrote:
What happened?
brookly red wrote:
No; one starts by getting conservative people on the school board, and keeping an eye on the schools—and not being afraid to take on the local teachers.
You don’t take the teacher’s unions on first or head on; you take over the boards that control the schools and then bend the teachers to your will.
doriangrey wrote:
pretty good, tried and true and really safe.
the only thing is the chance of low potassium because of the way it works in the distal loop and the loop of henle in the kidneys.
it blocks the absorption of sodium and chloride casing a very noticeable increase in urine.
it wastes potassium as well but i dont want to get into the cation reasons here.
Rodan wrote:
I remember 92 and I was a young mother raising two sons. I didn’t view the Republican party as something awful for saying something about the decaying culture. I think like MacDuff said what happened with this election isn’t so much the Republicans (it was a tight race) but more to do with the voters…
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
yeah that is a good granular plan to get to the first milestone
Rodan wrote:
what?
i don’t see anything that indicates that the Jesuits officially, as an organization, embrace liberation theology here http://www.jesuit.org/
brookly red wrote:
A culture war that has not been fought for fifty years is not won overnight.
Kirly wrote:
the jesuits single handedly spread liberation theology through latin america and through the catholic church from the 1960′s-1980′s until jp 2 put the clamps on them.
seriously, that organization went hard core left / commie.
Lily wrote:
yes we have gotten soft. In 92 a drug addict was a criminal, in 2012 a drug addict is a victim. In 92 an illegal was illegal, in 2012 an illegal is a victim. In 92 a terrorist was a terrorist, in 2012 a terrorist is a political activist (and a victim). I could go on all night.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
exactly like my previous posts… the children of today’s liberals will realize their lot in life sucks and act accordingly.
coldwarrior wrote:
so, they have been beaten back then and are under control now? that would explain the “clean” website.
brookly red wrote:
they will be sullen and lazy?
brookly red wrote:
Not necessarily. Unless they are given a well-articulated history of what brought them to where they are, and shown how the alternative can work, they will merely do what Obama and the Democrats count on—double down on demonizing the eeevil conservatives who have stood in the way of the success of their programs.
Kirly wrote:
no they have been oppressed by the man… LOL
brookly red wrote:
I could go on all night too between now and 1992….it’s amazing what is considered *okay* now days!! When it use to be WRONG! Not to mention we didn’t have all the hypen-Americans now we ______-American instead of American. High-school football teams can’t even say a prayer before a game without someone being offended or suing. It has gotten insane all of this pc crap…it hasn’t made our culture better it has put a huge rock around it’s neck.
Kirly wrote:
Yes they have been beaten back…it is true the Jesuits really did bring in the left into the Church for a time. I am sure there is some hold-overs.
Kirly wrote:
it was an epic struggle within the catholic church and the leadership all the way to doctrine and cannon.
there are still remnants and outspoken proponents of liberation theology but it has been reduced and derided especially in 1984 by the then cardinal ratzinger. the jesuits werent the only order infested with this disease.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
with all due respect that is almost liberal. so people must be given something to act in their own best interest?
doriangrey wrote:
That’s great news, Dorian!
beer run bbiab
coldwarrior wrote:
No they weren’t the only ones…but right now the Church is doing it’s best to drive this smoke out.
@ Lily:
And yet Father Pfleger is still preaching hate in Chicago…
Flyovercountry wrote:
Exactly my point on last nights thread. We need to coopt the media with our own message. It’s possible. If we buy into the media we can even the playing field. Taking on the school boards is a great idea too. Even here our school boards are dominated by libs and conservatives don’t win.
brookly red wrote:
No they need to be given the true history instead of doubling-down on the same. As with this last election with the media totally in the tank for obama we see what happens when people are ignorant of what is truly going on..they double-down on the same.
lobo91 wrote:
That’s unique case I do believe they tried to remove him but the people threw a hell-fit. Rix would know better concerning him. He doesn’t represent the Church very much.
Has anyone realized the dems have elected two drug addicts as president? Their only two president wins and both are druggies.
brookly red wrote:
I think you are misunderstanding me.
I say, yes—the children of today’s liberals must be given an alternative vision, and it is up to us to give it. For where else are they to obtain it? From their liberal parents? From their Leftist public-school teachers? From their Marxist college professors? From the Leftist mainstream media? From the Left-slanted films?
Or do you trust children and young adults who have never been taught the concept of independent inquiry, have never been taught to reason or analyze, to somehow magically stumble upon a conservative alternative? Ain’t happenin’, and to expect it to happen is abdication of a duty.
Yes, I’ll say it again—they have to be given an alternative vision. Not free cheese, free rubbers, and Obamaphones™—they have to be given the awareness that their current misery comes from the very ideology that has promised all their lives to shield them from misery—for the adherents of that ideology, who surround them, will surely not guide them to an alternative.
some light reading.
section ‘XI ORIENTATIONS’ is quite clear
Mars wrote:
Amazing isn’t it…although clinton smoking weed but didn’t inhale isn’t quite on par as obama’s coke habit.
Lily wrote:
Sort of makes all those conspiracy movies and books about the Vatican look silly, doesn’t it?
The Pope is secretly running the world, but can’t get rid of one dipshit priest?
@ Mars:
Dealing with the media is part three of my own series, as yet unwritten, except for my outline. It can be done, and a Republican President has actually succeeded in this endeavor, and it wasn’t Ronald Reagan. He was a master of something far more impressive. Much of what I have to say was actually laid out in a blue print written by the guy who used to have the task of following Hunter S. Thompson around the country and bonding him almost daily out of jail.
Lily wrote:
The problem is that without Clinton’s debasement of the presidency, we never would have had Obama.
lobo91 wrote:
Pfather Pfleger is pfull of pshit.
lobo91 wrote:
Monica “got her Presidential kneepads” for Bill Clinton.
Obama has issued “presidential kneepads” to the nation.
lobo91 wrote:
Don’t know if the Pope is aware of it…it would fall first to the Bishop in that Parish and then the Cardinal who is over that parish concerning that priest.
lobo91 wrote:
henry II knew how to get rid of troublesome clergy…
“Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?”
lobo91 wrote:
Along with society as well or you wouldn’t of had Clinton.
Lily wrote:
chicken, egg,? satan.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Not exactly. Remember he does not play for that team. It feels more as though we’ve been raped in the other end of the anatomy.
brookly red wrote:
Well you have to look at the people who voted for Clinton and Obama to see these are the men that the people want to be thier president. Although obama is much worse than Clinton he is a symptom of our society by large. When more people think free things and envy and class warfare are more important than the massive debt this country has we have a problem Houston.
@ 1389AD:
Now there’s a visual I didn’t need heading into Thanksgiving. I can see that I’m going to need two shots before beddy bye time this evening.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
They all need to be hit over the head with a clue-by-four.
1389AD wrote:
Supposedly—and I have no idea whatever as to the truth of these allegations—Obama used to sneak off to Chicago’s Man’s Country bath house in order to be gone down on by white men. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that these unconfirmed rumors are true, such behavior would be wholly consistent with the mindset of someone who likes to see himself in the “dominant position.”
Lily wrote:
yeah we got a problem, people worship mammon… this is not a new development.
1389AD wrote:
Perhaps. But whacking someone over the head, however satisfying in the short term, does not win converts to a mindset.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
and yet he married Moochell… my,my,my.
brookly red wrote:
No it isn’t a new problem but it is getting worse by light speed lately.
Like the Good Book says, “There is nothing new under the sun.”
1389AD wrote:
well also remember his definition of “we” does not include us.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
That…would mean he’s a Pitcher, wouldn’t it?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Perhaps one day, someone will bite his dick off….
well it seems that the natural order of the universe continues…
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/11/21/report-jesse-jackson-jr-resigning-from-congress/
Macker wrote:
/oh great, our first transgendered president…
WOW! I never would have known…
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/21/msnbc-president-this-channel-has-never-been-the-voice-of-obama-ever/
brookly red wrote:
He already is that…oh wait Newsweek said he was our first Gay President with the rainbow halo.
Lily wrote:
Newsweek…didn’t they go the way of twinkies ?
@ brookly red:
Yep …I think their last issue is in December if I remember correctly.
Lily wrote:
well if CJ is reading this I guess it is proof of evolution
Nite all ….have HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!
coldwarrior wrote:
And he was indeed turbulent. Great scene.
@ doriangrey:
Awesome.
brookly red wrote:
They make vegetarian beer?
Rodan wrote:
Quite right -- it was pandering at its worst.
Flyovercountry wrote:
I was not disagreeing with you at all, just stating my opinion.
doriangrey wrote:
hops are not a critter, you do know that?
brookly red wrote:
Have you ever seen a hop?
doriangrey wrote:
Besides, everybody knows vegetarians only drink Soy Wine…
doriangrey wrote:
yes, I know more than one brewing wench
The blue states will be singin the blues.
OWN IT: Top 5 States to be Hit Hardest by 2013 Tax Increases — Supported Obama!
HopDevil
huckfunn wrote:
Suckers.
MacDuff wrote:
I see what you did there!
doriangrey wrote:
Yep!
doriangrey wrote:
I am not a veggie, I eat fish, eggs, cheese etc. I just don’t eat commercially produced meat products… hey if you wanna pop a cap in Bambi’s ass I am down for the neck roast but no growth hormones for me.
brookly red wrote:
You don’t know no wenches…
doriangrey wrote:
I’ve seen bunnies…
@ MacDuff:
Love it.
huckfunn wrote:
well if they didn’t mean to take it they should have not bent over…
brookly red wrote:
Oh, I loves poppen a cap in Bambi’s ass…
Get’s me some least twice a year… 
doriangrey wrote:
your still pissed bout the Chevy… time to get over it
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Thar’s a joke in their somewhere… I just knows it…
@ Lily:
@ coldwarrior:
i’m not Catholic and knew nothing of the Jesuit involvement with the hideous ideology of liberation theology. it’s shocking and disgusting.
@ Bumr50:
@ huckfunn:
brookly red wrote:
Can’t get over it till it sells…
brookly red wrote:
BO will have the Czar of Exemptions and Dispensations review this policy on a blue state by blue state level.
G’night all!
@ MacDuff:
G’nite Mac. Good post.
doriangrey wrote:
OK now we can talk. I like the neck roast and the ribs. I don’t usually get my own but when I do .243 Win Mag is how I roll.
doriangrey wrote:
Jimmy Carter
doriangrey wrote:
Bunnies:
@ lobo91:
Oh the horror…
doriangrey wrote:
It was the only bunny song I could think of…
brookly red wrote:
Macker wrote:
People are remarkably innocent, it seems, about sexual pathologies.
I know someone who is homosexually inclined, yet who has an adulation for certain women, including “Buffy” and Sarah Palin.
I know of people who dress up in leather sadomasochistic drag to seek sexual partners, yet who are pussycats in normal life.
There is no contradiction between Obama being the servile toady of one or more strong women, and his seeking to reassert his “dominance” in another area; indeed, his servility in the one area makes his preening performance in the other area more likely rather than less.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
yeah kinky … this dude fucked 300 million people.
brookly red wrote:
And 175 million of them LIKED IT…
doriangrey wrote:
There’s got to be a morning after
If we can hold on through the night
We have a chance to find the sunshine
Let’s keep on looking for the light
yes we can!
Did we just pressure Israel to lift the blockade in return for Egypt’s promise to keep arms from interring Gaza? Please tell me I’m wrong!
Rancher wrote:
Something like that, yeah.
brookly red wrote:
Actually you aim for the heart. Going for the butt just leaves a wounded and very angry buck that might bleed to death someplace, or on the other hand, if he isn’t wounded that badly, he just might come back and look for you.
doriangrey wrote:
Not in person.
Rancher wrote:
According to Carl in Jerusalem:
This very brief, unsourced piece in Hebrew perhaps explains everything that’s going on. It explains why Hillary Clinton is suddenly here. It explains why Israel is sitting at the edge of Gaza without going in. It explains why there have been less bombing missions today (Wednesday) than any other day.
The piece claims that President Obama has agreed in principle for the IDF to conquer Gaza and throw Hamas out. (Link in Hebrew only).
But… and it’s a huge but. He wants Gaza turned over to ‘moderate’ ‘Palestinian’ President
Mahmoud AbbasAbu Mazen and, so that this can be portrayed as Abu Mazen ‘saving’ the ‘Palestinians’ and to strengthen Abu Mazen’s position, he wants Israel to immediately declare a ‘Palestinian state’ in wide swaths of Judea and Samaria, which would of course also be turned over to Abu Mazen.As a bonus (not mentioned in the article), Abu Mazen would presumably then drop his appeal to the United Nations.
The Israeli government is said to be furious because if Israel does not agree, Obama will not back a ground operation, effectively a veto.
Although this has no sourcing, it makes too much sense. It explains why the Israeli government has not agreed to it. We’re being asked to choose our poison.
What could go wrong?
UPDATE 10:09 PM
A cease fire was declared an hour ago. Prime Minister Netanyahu apparently decided he would rather let Hamas live to fight another day than give Fatah all of Gaza and most of Judea and Samaria for their ‘state.’ Probably the right move under the circumstances.
Rancher wrote:
what part of hope and change did you not understand? this is no longer of men, the antichrist will back the Jews up into a corner where they will be forced to use nuclear weapons to survive another day. Please don’t use the word “we” when discussing it… we had nothing to do with it.
Netanyahu should simply have pretended not to receive any messages from Hillary, Obama, et. al.
And then have unexpected delays at the airport if any of them tried to come in.
If anybody complained, he could have asked: “Where were you when your own ambassador pleaded for your help?”
The Wreck of the Old ’87
—apologies to “The Wreck of the Old 97″
Well, they gave us our blueprint back in Philadelphia
Sayin’ “This is the Constitution.
It is a republic, if you can but keep it
But if you stray from this the country’s done.”
Then we took that document and started building a nation
For a couple hundred years or so
And though we amended it upon occasion
That blueprint helped our country grow
But alas, over time people slowly discovered
That they could tap into the treasury
Voting benefits that they called entitlements
And they thought that all of it was free
What could this do but lead to a major disaster?
They elevated to be President
Someone who could not even pass a basic budget
But who set records for the cash he spent.
He has grabbed for himself unconstitutional power
Trying to rule by presidential decree
And to replace the blueprint for limited government
With a regulatory jamboree
So now all you voters better take a warnin’
From this time on and learn
Never trade your freedom for government promises
If you want to retain what you earn
Where is everybody?
Busy cooking food ahead of time?
@ 1389AD:
I’ve been watching Expendables 2. I think it was sponsored by AARP
1389AD wrote:
YUP
just got tom all prepped
I don’t do “stuffing” we have dressing
ole tom is full of onions,garlic,carrots, and celery
@ rain of lead:
gonna do a slow roast
300d till done
about 170d
Either everybody is asleep, or they’re wrestling with that not-quite-thawed turkey…
Good morning everyone. Just winding up the anniversary party. Probably won’t be a post tomorrow. Have a happy Thanksgiving.
@ PaladinPhil:
Good night shot of the lights…
the tentative schedule for today is an educational Thanksgiving open thread at 0700est.
maybe another open if needed
at 1700est some interesting articles on the Mayan calendar.
at 2200est, BunkX’s thanksgiving OOT.
@ Mike C.:
Yonge St this time of year has lighted displays like that all over. Will probably do a wander down the strip later this month early December to catch them all.
Lawdy. I arose to find Mrs. MacDuff having departed on an early commerce sortie. Geez, better her than me.
She made coffee, though……..
@ MacDuff:
good on her!
i was scheduled to work today (would have been on double time $$$$) but it looks like i am going to be cancelled for the day, so I will start the turkey now!
coldwarrior wrote:
The Mayan calendar does not include leap years. The World has already ended.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
DAMN! i knew something was amiss!
coldwarrior wrote:
… and I feel fine …
coldwarrior wrote:
coldwarrior wrote:
Money tends to come and go, but we’ve a finite number of Thanksgivings, and I certainly hope you enjoy yours. I hope Mrs. CW is well and continues to improve, no doubt that’ll be high on your list of thanksgivings!
I sprang for a fried turkey breast from a local butcher (I’ve become quite Tim Tayloresque since the stroke -- staying away from vats of boiling oil is…..prudent). I will, however, be starting my decadent corn pudding, shortly.
‘Tis just Mrs. MacDuff and myself as it is most every year. We’ve considered going to a restaurant, but that just wouldn’t feel quite right. Traditions can exist with two as well as with 22.
Have a wonderful Thanksgiving, all!
new thread y’all / yinz!
Guggi wrote:
Thanks for posting that, he’s as relevant now as he ever was!