First time visitor? Learn more.

Anti-white bigotry goes mainstream

by Speranza ( 211 Comments › )
Filed under Bigotry, Media at November 28th, 2012 - 8:00 am

Nothing so obnoxious as the bigoted use of the description “old white guys” or just plain “white males” being used so casually.  A pasty faced, aging, paunchy,  white blogger who used to be somewhat relevant has indicated his self loathing by constantly referring to “old, white males” without seeing the irony of that statement.

 

by James Taranto

Everytime [sic] I think the Democratic race card players could not get more vile, more deranged, more patronizingly demeaning to blacks, someone manages to defy even my vivid imagination,” thunders blogger William Jacobson. He’s referring to a passage in a Washington Posteditorial about critics of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice–a passage that in our view is useful for its clarity.

At issue is a Nov. 19 letter to the President Obama, written by Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina and signed by 97 House Republicans, which declares that the signatories are “deeply troubled” that the president is considering nominating Rice secretary of state, and that they “strongly oppose” such a nomination.

[..........]

The Post focuses on the critics rather than their choice of words. Here’s the passage that outrages Jacobson: “Could it be, as members of the Congressional Black Caucus are charging, that the signatories of the letter are targeting Ms. Rice because she is an African American woman? The signatories deny that, and we can’t know their hearts. What we do know is that more than 80 of the signatories are white males, and nearly half are from states of the former Confederacy.”

Let’s examine this argument carefully. The Post acknowledges that “we can’t know their hearts.” But it finds a (literally) prima facie reason to suspect them of invidious motives: Almost all of them are persons of pallor. The Post is casting aspersions on Duncan and his colleagues based explicitly on the color of their skin. And it is accusing them of racism!

A couple of other items related to race and politics caught our attention over the Thanksgiving weekend. First, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., an Illinois Democrat and CBC member, resigned from Congress “amid federal ethics investigations and a diagnosis of mental illness,” as the Chicago Tribune reports. That sets up a special election to fill the vacancy:

[........]
This passes with neither editorial comment nor a disapproving quote. It’s hard to imagine the same absence of reaction if a group of pols offered “to broker a nominee” with the goal of preventing a black candidate from winning a white-majority district.

Then there’s the email from the Obama campaign–yeah, they’re still coming, though at a slower pace than before the election–inviting supporters to take a survey. Among the questions: “Which constituency groups do you identify yourself with? Select all that apply.”

There are 22 boxes you can check off. Some are ideological (“Environmentalists” and perhaps “Labor”), some occupational (“Educators,” “Healthcare professionals”), some regional (“Americans abroad,” “Rural Americans”). There’s a box for “Women” but none for men, though there’s a separate “Gender” question, which hilariously has three options: “Male,” “Female” and “Other/no answer.” Touré will no doubt soon inveigh against the “otherization” of the Gender No. 3.

What caught our attention were the ethnic categories: “African Americans,” “Arab-Americans,” “Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders,” Jewish Americans,” “Latinos” and “Native Americans” (the last, of course, refers to American Indians, not natural-born citizens).

[........]

One explanation for the absence of a “white” or “European-American” category (or, alternatively, several dozen specific European ethnicities) could be that whites tend to vote Republican, and the campaign is interested in Democratic-leaning voting blocs. But several other of the Obama survey categories lean toward the GOP, too: “People of faith,” “Rural Americans,” “Seniors,” “Small business owners” and “Veterans/military families.” Counterpart groups that are Democratic-leaning or swing-voting are missing from the list, too, including nonbelievers, urban and suburban dwellers, and the middle-aged (though there are categories for both “Young professionals” and “Youth”).

The reason for the absence of a “Whites” category is that white identity politics is all but nonexistent in America today. That wasn’t always the case, of course: For a century after the Civil War, Southern white supremacists were an important part of the Democratic Party coalition. They were defeated and discredited in the 1960s, and the Democrats, still the party of identity politics, switched their focus to various nonwhite minorities.

Obama’s re-election was a triumph for this new identity politics–but the Post’s nasty editorial hints at a reason to think this form of politics may have long-term costs for both the party and the country.

The trouble with a diverse coalition based on ethnic or racial identity is that solidarity within each group can easily produce conflicts among the groups. Permissive immigration policies, for example, may be good for Hispanics and Asians but bad for blacks. Racial preferences in college admissions help blacks and Hispanics at the expense of Asians.

One way of holding together such a disparate coalition is by delivering prosperity, so that everyone can feel he’s doing well. Failing that, another way is by identifying a common adversary–such as the “white male.” During Obama’s first term, the demonization of the “white male” was common among left-liberal commentators, especially MSNBC types. The Post has now lent its considerably more mainstream institutional voice to this form of bigotry.

This seems likely to weaken the taboo against white identity politics. Whites who are not old enough to remember the pre-civil-rights era–Rep. Duncan, for instance, was born in 1966–have every reason to feel aggrieved by being targeted in this way.

The danger to Democrats is that they still need white votes. According to this year’s exit polls, Obama won re-election while receiving only 39% of the white vote. But that’s higher than Mitt Romney’s percentage among blacks (6%), Latinos (27%), Asian-Americans (26%) or “Other” (38%). It’s true that Republicans suffer electorally for the perception that they are hostile to minorities, but Democrats also stand to suffer for being hostile to whites.

The danger for the country is that a racially polarized electorate will produce a hostile, balkanized culture. In 2008 Obama held out the hope of a postracial America. His re-election raises the possibility of a most-racial America.

Read the rest -  Most-racial America

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

211 Responses to “Anti-white bigotry goes mainstream”
( jump to bottom )

  1. ferb123
    1 | November 28, 2012 8:19 am

    OMG. Romneys final share of popular vote is 47%

    XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/26/romneys-final-share-of-the-vote-you-guessed-it-47-percent/


  2. Storagemanager
    2 | November 28, 2012 8:19 am

    Muslims Claim Netanyahu Plans to Build ‘False’ Holy Temple

    Netanyahu’s latest building plan for Jerusalem is none other than for the Third Temple, claims Al Aqsa Foundation. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/162621


  3. heysoos
    3 | November 28, 2012 8:21 am

    more proof the internet is making people hysterical


  4. 4 | November 28, 2012 8:26 am

    @ heysoos:

    How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.


  5. Storagemanager
    5 | November 28, 2012 8:28 am

    At some point, Beck decided that submerging an Obama “bobblehead” doll in urine (later revealed to be completely fake) was necessary to convey his artistic message. He of course realizes this will be controversial and that many will find his use of the Obama figurine to be disrespectful. The idea, for Beck however, is not to be untoward, but through irony, to highlight the hypocrisy of those who would shout in defiance at defacing the image of a sitting U.S. president, but not that of an image so sacred to Christianity — the world’s largest religion. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/you-wont-believe-what-glenn-beck-plans-to-do-to-an-obama-bobblehead-tuesday-evening/


  6. heysoos
    6 | November 28, 2012 8:29 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.

    the reference was to our pal furb…my bad


  7. heysoos
    7 | November 28, 2012 8:30 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.

    and btw, I agree with you


  8. 8 | November 28, 2012 8:33 am

    @ heysoos:

    I see. Yeah, Ferby is a little touched… :mrgreen:


  9. citizen_q
    9 | November 28, 2012 8:42 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    @ heysoos:

    Trouble is it has been around for a very long time. PC, tolerance, and good taste misguided me to just let it go. It was just until relatively recently has it become so toxic and a staple of mainstream demoncrapic discourse and strategy, that I could not ignore or laugh it off any more. My tolerance for it is at an end, be it the so-called comedy of Garrett Morris or Tyler Perry sitcoms, to obvious anti-white assaults by black mobs.


  10. buzzsawmonkey
    10 | November 28, 2012 8:43 am

    Why is there a picture of a grub at the top of the thread?


  11. buzzsawmonkey
  12. Storagemanager
    12 | November 28, 2012 8:46 am

    Egyptian court sentences seven Christians to death for Muhammad video

    Since Obama has repeatedly condemned this video, don’t expect him to stand up for the freedom of speech or say a word about this new advance of Sharia in glorious “Arab Spring” Egypt.

    “Egyptian Christians sentenced to death for anti-Islam film,” from Reuters, November 28 (thanks to Twostellas):

    CAIRO -- A Cairo court on Wednesday sentenced to death seven Egyptian Christians tried in absentia for participating in an anti-Islam video that was released on the Internet in September and had prompted violent protests in many Muslim countries.
    “The seven accused persons were convicted of insulting the Islamic religion through participating in producing and offering a movie that insults Islam and its prophet,” Judge Saif al-Nasr Soliman said….
    http://www.jihadwatch.org/


  13. Speranza
    13 | November 28, 2012 8:51 am

    ferb123 wrote:

    OMG. Romneys final share of popular vote is 47%
    XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/26/romneys-final-share-of-the-vote-you-guessed-it-47-percent/

    Hardly a blow out scheisskopf!


  14. Speranza
    14 | November 28, 2012 8:53 am

    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.


  15. 15 | November 28, 2012 8:53 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Diversity! That is the natural end of Left-wing diversity efforts. They would have no standards of decency, because they are indecent people.


  16. Speranza
    16 | November 28, 2012 8:53 am

    47% means that it is a divided country.


  17. Storagemanager
    17 | November 28, 2012 8:54 am

    Speranza wrote:

    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.

    hahahahahahahahahahahaha


  18. heysoos
    18 | November 28, 2012 8:56 am

    Speranza wrote:

    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.

    looks rodentesque to me….beedy eyed


  19. buzzsawmonkey
    19 | November 28, 2012 8:57 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.

    The Civil Rights Movement challenged the larger society to confront and address the entrenched racism that did indeed exist there. But the hijacking of that movement by the Left ensured that while the white community was working to eliminate racism and render expressions of it unacceptable, the black community did no such thing. For forty years it has been doubling down on the racism that already existed there, and fostering resentment and a victim mentality. The Left has protected this by claiming that “racism” is not prejudice based on race, but a function of “who has the power”—and, since it defined blacks/women/gays, indeed, anyone and everything except white males, as “not having the power,” these entrenched bigotries have not only never been addressed, but have been exacerbated.


  20. Storagemanager
    20 | November 28, 2012 9:00 am

    Real Islam

    Ayatollah Khomeini… “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world”


  21. waldensianspirit
    21 | November 28, 2012 9:00 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Well that’s changed


  22. MikeA
    22 | November 28, 2012 9:05 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    Then lets oblige him…


  23. Storagemanager
    23 | November 28, 2012 9:06 am

    Move over Chuck Norris

    The terrorist turned on the light and said something in Arabic, she recalled. He had a knife in one hand and a metal pipe in the other. Suddenly he lunged at Yael, stabbing her in the face and shoulder.

    What the terrorist did not know is that Yael is an athlete trained in Krav Maga, Israeli military hand-to-hand combat. She used her skills to drive him back and into the bathroom, and locked him in. At the same time, she pushed her young children to safety.
    http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/israeli-mother-of-four-fights-off-terrorist-with-martial-arts/


  24. Storagemanager
    24 | November 28, 2012 9:06 am

    MikeA wrote:

    @ Storagemanager:
    Then lets oblige him…

    Got President?


  25. 25 | November 28, 2012 9:10 am

    Storagemanager wrote:

    Got President?

    Unfortunately, no…


  26. Speranza
    26 | November 28, 2012 9:13 am

    @ Storagemanager:
    I took Krav Maga.


  27. 27 | November 28, 2012 9:14 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.

    All created by Progressive whites. That is the irony of this.


  28. 28 | November 28, 2012 9:15 am

    Speranza wrote:

    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.

    He’s a very disgusting looking.


  29. Speranza
    29 | November 28, 2012 9:16 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.

    He’s a very disgusting looking.

    he looks like a pervert.


  30. Speranza
    30 | November 28, 2012 9:16 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ heysoos:
    How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.

    All created by Progressive whites. That is the irony of this.

    Self hating white people.


  31. 31 | November 28, 2012 9:18 am

    Speranza wrote:

    47% means that it is a divided country.

    It means the Republcians better get their act together. If they nominate Jeb, Christie, Santorum or Huckabee, they will be lucky to get 37% next time since many will split off.


  32. 32 | November 28, 2012 9:21 am

    @ Speranza:

    I don’t think they are self hating. They view themselves as more enlightened Whites hence Post Race. They view NOn whites as their slaves and use them for power.


  33. 33 | November 28, 2012 9:21 am

    @ Speranza:

    He looks souless.


  34. 34 | November 28, 2012 9:21 am

    @ Speranza:

    No, they don’t hate themselves. They are mostly the children of privilege, and they are very protective of that privilege. Like the people who claim they want taxes to go up, they mean to decry “white privilege” for other people. White privilege now being defined as lacking discrimination in favor of certain minorities. But they don’t want to give up their place at the top of the pile. The Kennedys and the Kerreys of this world are the model for this.


  35. heysoos
    35 | November 28, 2012 9:22 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    47% means that it is a divided country.
    It means the Republcians better get their act together. If they nominate Jeb, Christie, Santorum or Huckabee, they will be lucky to get 37% next time since many will split off.

    Santorum is already begging to run…no class at all


  36. citizen_q
    36 | November 28, 2012 9:23 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    Well said. I don’t think I have seen a better description of the problem.


  37. texasam7
    37 | November 28, 2012 9:28 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    Totally true, that. As long as they rule the roost, the eloi are content.


  38. 38 | November 28, 2012 9:29 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    They are mostly the children of privilege, and they are very

    Bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    They view themselves as enlightened feudal lords!


  39. 39 | November 28, 2012 9:29 am

    texasam7 wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Totally true, that. As long as they rule the roost, the eloi are content.

    Read Plato’s the Republic, it is the blueprint.


  40. texasam7
    40 | November 28, 2012 9:35 am

    @ Rodan:
    After reading books like “Inside The Third Reich”, I was struck by the banality of evil and how ordinary it can look. Sometimes, it’s just a complete lack of empathy that can allow someone to commit the worst atrocities.


  41. rain of lead
    41 | November 28, 2012 9:37 am

    @ texasam7:

    well hey there newnic
    pull up a chair and sit a spell

    oh yeah

    please don’t crap on the floor


  42. buzzsawmonkey
    42 | November 28, 2012 9:42 am

    The Left continues to justify its anti-white racism by pointing to its ever-swelling hatred as a self-fulfilling prophecy; claiming to be all about “peace and love,” they clearly could not hate whites generally, and white males in particular, unless there were reasons for doing so.

    In fact, however, this hatred exists and metastasizes in inverse proportion to any actual issue. Look at the black commentators in the media; Toure, Michael Eric Dyson, Cornel West—the entire rogue’s gallery. A very few, such as West, are old enough to have experienced the last dying gasps of Jim Crow in their earliest childhood, but most have not; and, indeed, all have benefited handsomely from the larger society’s efforts to eliminate even the tiniest vestigial legacy of race prejudice. Yet these people, and their unhinged race-baiting fellow travelers such as Chris Matthews, cannot let a day go by without decrying prejudices and societal disabilities which have long ceased to exist, in any meaningful way.

    Their cries of “racism” are in inverse proportion to racism’s actual existence, as their hatred of “white privilege” is in inverse proportion to its actual existence; they must maintain the fiction of these things to justify their own privilege.


  43. 43 | November 28, 2012 9:45 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    All true. The worship of “diversity” is what I find particularly dangerous (and annoying), it’s fractured our culture into countless groups and sub groups, all with some manner of grievance or perceived grievance. Sure, we’re always going to have differing races and source ethnicities, but our strength has always been our ability to absorb these differences with the various parts becoming one with the whole and the whole being enhanced and improved by the process. I’ll stipulate it was never particularly easy or quick, but immigrants strove to assimilate into our culture and our culture evolved accordingly.

    Not only does assimilation seem to have fallen out of favor with some immigrants groups, we are seeing native-born Americans de-assimilating, forming ethnicity-based enclaves that delight in being perpetually at odds with the larger culture. This is becoming increasingly evident in national elections with, what seems to be an ever-lengthening list of groups that demand their issues to be addressed -- even though “Issues” are pretty homogenous across racial/ethnic lines.


  44. Speranza
    44 | November 28, 2012 9:47 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I don’t think they are self hating. They view themselves as more enlightened Whites hence Post Race. They view NOn whites as their slaves and use them for power.

    Good point. In fact they are narcissists who want the easy life so for them it is easier to trash their own race.


  45. 45 | November 28, 2012 9:47 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:

    He looks souless.

    That’s precisely the word I had in mind.


  46. Speranza
    46 | November 28, 2012 9:47 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    He looks souless.

    He has no character and looking into his beady eyes you can tell.


  47. Speranza
    47 | November 28, 2012 9:49 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    No, they don’t hate themselves. They are mostly the children of privilege, and they are very protective of that privilege. Like the people who claim they want taxes to go up, they mean to decry “white privilege” for other people. White privilege now being defined as lacking discrimination in favor of certain minorities. But they don’t want to give up their place at the top of the pile. The Kennedys and the Kerreys of this world are the model for this.

    That is why I have no problems on raising taxes on the rich -- they all voted for Obama in the hopes that the Republicans will not approve any tax increases for them.


  48. 48 | November 28, 2012 9:50 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:

    I don’t think they are self hating. They view themselves as more enlightened Whites hence Post Race. They view NOn whites as their slaves and use them for power.

    It’s curious that those who claim to be “post racial” have a near psychotic obsession with race.


  49. Speranza
    49 | November 28, 2012 9:55 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    It’s curious that those who claim to be “post racial” have a near psychotic obsession with race.

    The very definition of racism.


  50. buzzsawmonkey
    50 | November 28, 2012 9:56 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    It’s curious that those who claim to be “post racial” have a near psychotic obsession with race.

    Again—you have to understand the language. Just as “diversity” means “surface differences of appearance masking an enforced lockstep uniformity of thought,” “post-racial” does not mean “getting past racial differences”—far from it.

    To any sane person, unmarinated in Leftist jargon, “post-racial” would mean “getting past racial differences.” But that is not what the Left means by it. Since in Leftist World white people are always racist, whether consciously or not, and black people are always the non-racist victims, regardless of the level of power or privilege or wealth they attain, “post-racial” means “deposing the racists and having the non-racists run things.”

    In other words, Obama was very consciously sold to the American people on a “post-racial” basis by people who knew that the term would be taken as reconciliatory by most people of good will. They, however, used the term to mean something wholly different from reconciliation; they used it as the code-word for the establishment of a revanchist regime based upon the principle of “we’re in charge, now we’re gonna get ours.” And that is what we have.


  51. buzzsawmonkey
    51 | November 28, 2012 9:57 am

    In other words, the entire Obama sales effort was a matter of race-bait-and-switch.


  52. 52 | November 28, 2012 9:58 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Post Racial = Post White


  53. 53 | November 28, 2012 9:58 am

    @ MacDuff:

    They are racists, but a slicker version of it. White Progressives envision a racial caste system.


  54. 54 | November 28, 2012 9:59 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    Sure, we’re always going to have differing races and source ethnicities

    Yes, bt you no longer see prejudice against the Irish, Italians, Poles, or other groups that were discriminated against every bit as much as blacks 100 years ago, nor do you see ethnic grievance groups from these groups. Instead, they are now all the hated “white man”. The Conservative goal is that none of these grievance groups exist. That we truly become a society where people are judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not surprisingly, the Democrats want exactly the opposite. They’d bring back Jim Crow, just change the color of the skin discriminated against. Look at how they place Susan Rice above question because she is nominally black.


  55. 55 | November 28, 2012 10:02 am

    @ Speranza:
    @ MacDuff:
    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I know coworker who saw Lincoln. She was surprised that he was a Republican. She was talking with someone else and I overheard her saying “I didn’t know Republicans were against slavery. They really changed and are like Nazis now.” Those were exact words. I did not say anything because I did not want to blow my cover.

    This is the mentality we are dealing with.


  56. 56 | November 28, 2012 10:03 am

    @ Speranza:

    I have no problems raising the taxes on the real rich, but those whom Obama calls rich are mostly upper middle class (doctors and lawyers and such) or small businesses that pay taxes as individuals because they are so small. It is the latter that is the most troubling. Unemployment is at a real rate of about 11%, and they want to raise taxes on small businesses? Repoublicans don’t make that arguement, though. It is as though they want to lose. The real rich, the Kerreys and Kennedys, will continue to only pay nominal amounts, though. I’d put a sur-tax on trust fund disbursements. Say 50%. Hit them where they live.


  57. 57 | November 28, 2012 10:04 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Susan Rice above question because she is nominally black.

    In a Latin country, Rice would not be white Black. She would be considered Mix race. Actually the biggest joke is that the majority of Black Americans are NOT Black!


  58. 58 | November 28, 2012 10:05 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    I say Republicans should put tax raises at 1 Million dollars. Also a 30% excise tax on Entertainment industry profits.


  59. RIX
    59 | November 28, 2012 10:05 am

    Good morning. That is really a nice picture of Johnson.
    The guy stays is shape & dresses well./


  60. 60 | November 28, 2012 10:06 am

    RIX wrote:

    Good morning. That is really a nice picture of Johnson.
    The guy stays is shape & dresses well./

    This picture is nearly 3 years old. I can imagine how much worse he looks.


  61. EBL
    61 | November 28, 2012 10:08 am

    I am willing to give Chunky Boo Boo a pass on this. With his moobs and obvious mood swings, he may be hormonally closer to female than male.


  62. 62 | November 28, 2012 10:11 am

    EBL wrote:

    I am willing to give Chunky Boo Boo a pass on this. With his moobs and obvious mood swings, he may be hormonally closer to female than male.

    :lol:


  63. 63 | November 28, 2012 10:12 am

    @ Rodan:

    You can’t cure stupid…


  64. 64 | November 28, 2012 10:12 am

    The great news keeps on coming!

    Will Italy Need a Bailout in 2013?


  65. 65 | November 28, 2012 10:13 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    You can’t cure stupid…

    The Media-Entertainment Industry Complex! Until this is addressed we can come up with the greatest ideas in the world and nothing will come out of it.


  66. RIX
    66 | November 28, 2012 10:20 am

    Rodan wrote:

    RIX wrote:

    Good morning. That is really a nice picture of Johnson.
    The guy stays is shape & dresses well./

    This picture is nearly 3 years old. I can imagine how much worse he looks.

    No doubt there has not been a positive transformation.


  67. taxfreekiller
    67 | November 28, 2012 10:22 am

    That person up top, the one in the photo, is that of a high school lunch room lady, sure looks like one I remember.


  68. 68 | November 28, 2012 10:23 am

    @ heysoos:

    He looks like what Greg Gutfeld calls, ironically, “frilly lizards assuming human form.”


  69. 69 | November 28, 2012 10:24 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Yes, bt you no longer see prejudice against the Irish, Italians, Poles, or other groups that were discriminated against every bit as much as blacks 100 years ago, nor do you see ethnic grievance groups from these groups.

    All of these groups found a way to make their place in our culture and, as I said above, our culture was the better for it. The Irish were the lowest of the low in NYC and were forced to do jobs that were not exactly preferred -- being cops and firemen. Irish cops and firemen became part of the lore of New York and many of them trace their cop/fireman roots back for generations. The number of Irish names on the list of those firemen killed on 9/11 is rather breathtaking.

    These groups assimilated on their own and they’re now as much a part of America as those who can trace their roots to the Mayflower. I’m convinced that, had the Civil Rights movement stopped at guaranteeing rights and allowed our culture to do what it always has done we would have been much better off. Instead, we’ve kept blacks on “the short bus” for 50 years, thus imprinting on multiple generations the false idea that they’re incapable of making it on their own.


  70. taxfreekiller
    70 | November 28, 2012 10:24 am

    All Hail King Obama.

    Strangleflation is his goal.


  71. 71 | November 28, 2012 10:25 am

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    That person up top, the one in the photo, is that of a high school lunch room lady, sure looks like one I remember.

    :lol:

    OMG!


  72. 72 | November 28, 2012 10:25 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.
    He’s a very disgusting looking.

    I imagine the way he smells would probably require a heavy dosing of Freshnet. Bathing might help, too.


  73. bluliner10
    73 | November 28, 2012 10:25 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Speranza wrote:
    Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.
    He’s a very disgusting looking.

    He is not an “old white guy” notice the very hip flannel shirt and pony tails. Very modern. The very embodiment of manhood. I for one would follow him into a burning building…oh wait it is November 28th and not April 1st…sorry scratch all that.


  74. 74 | November 28, 2012 10:27 am

    @ Rodan:

    Yep. If you want to know what happened to Romney, all you need do is read the threads at Free Republic. I get what they’re saying as far as we’re sick of non-conservative candidates, but how about put it aside just this once and get a very dangerous man out of the White House and let him take his criminal enterprise with him?


  75. buzzsawmonkey
    75 | November 28, 2012 10:27 am

    Rodan wrote:

    In a Latin country, Rice would not be white Black. She would be considered Mix race. Actually the biggest joke is that the majority of Black Americans are NOT Black!

    “Race” is pseudoscience.

    It is a clumsy classification system based upon appearance that came into being when appearance was the most readily available means of classification. Yes, there are various genetic markers which show up differently in the various “races”—but since Frenchmen tend to look like Frenchmen, Germans like Germans, and Poles like Poles, there are doubtless similar markers, whether currently detectable or not, that would show up in all manner of subdivisions of each “race,” should anyone care to look for them.

    It was the racist Democrats who promulgated the “one drop rule,” and disputes over whether someone was a quadroon or an octoroon or a macaroon. Why play their game by discussing whether someone is “black” or not?


  76. RIX
    76 | November 28, 2012 10:28 am

    If you look at Susan Rice on Wiki, she has always feared that her
    accomplishments would be attributed to Affirmative Action.
    I can understand that, but you can’t have it both ways and
    hide behind race now.


  77. 77 | November 28, 2012 10:28 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I agree, the race crap is pseudoscience. Then again, the Left loves pseudoscience!


  78. 78 | November 28, 2012 10:30 am

    @ bluliner10:

    He is not an “old white guy” notice the very hip flannel shirt and pony tails. Very modern. The very embodiment of manhood. I for one would follow him into a burning building…oh wait it is November 28th and not April 1st…sorry scratch all that.

    :lol: ! The sad part is this man thinks he got Obama re-elected!


  79. Storagemanager
    79 | November 28, 2012 10:30 am

    bluliner10 wrote:

    pony tails. Very modern.

    Didn’t they wear pony tails 40 years ago?


  80. 80 | November 28, 2012 10:30 am

    @ Rodan:

    If Boehner and the conservatives are serious -- they should ask Obama -- show us your plan first.

    THEN, and only then, tell him they’ll raise taxes on the “1%” -- but only for those making over $1,000,000 a year. Period. None of this $250,000 stuff, or even $500,000 stuff. Then tell him in return, the budgets of every federal department -- EXCEPT defense -- be cut 10%.

    And elimination of the Earned Income Tax Credit.

    For once, make Obama give up something before you fold the hand, okay, Boehner?


  81. 81 | November 28, 2012 10:31 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    I think it was a combination of factors that did Romney in. I think 70% of Romney’s defeat is attributed to the Media-Entertainment Industry Complex. They have turn Obama into a cultural symbol.


  82. 82 | November 28, 2012 10:32 am

    @ EBL:

    I believe he was spotted going into a Lane Bryant at the Fashion Island mall last year.


  83. 83 | November 28, 2012 10:32 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    For once, make Obama give up something before you fold the hand, okay, Boehner?

    He is too busy crying!


  84. bluliner10
    84 | November 28, 2012 10:33 am

    Storagemanager wrote:

    bluliner10 wrote:
    pony tails. Very modern.
    Didn’t they wear pony tails 40 years ago?

    Pony tails are timeless! As are flannel shirts! Don’t be fooled by the bald head, goatee wearing peoples. They are a mere flash in the pan!


  85. Storagemanager
    85 | November 28, 2012 10:35 am

    bluliner10 wrote:

    Pony tails are timeless!

    That must be why ponies wear them.


  86. 86 | November 28, 2012 10:35 am

    @ bluliner10:

    As are flannel shirts!

    Hey Charles is bringing back the early to mid 90′s look!


  87. buzzsawmonkey
    87 | November 28, 2012 10:35 am

    RIX wrote:

    If you look at Susan Rice on Wiki, she has always feared that her
    accomplishments would be attributed to Affirmative Action.

    Rightly so.


  88. 88 | November 28, 2012 10:35 am

    @ Rodan:

    Indeed, plus the whole “Mormon” thing was hard for some (don’t know why, I know a lot of Mormons and can’t find anything to dislike in any of them). Where he really lost was with young, unmarried women, who are apparently easily duped into believing the stupidest crap imaginable.

    (You single guys should find out where they hang out on Saturday nights -- I’m thinking they’ll believe you if you tell them they look just like Gwyneth Paltrow).


  89. 89 | November 28, 2012 10:37 am

    @ bluliner10:

    There are 60-year-old ponytailed, flannel-wearing surfers hanging around The Wedge that would be embarrassed by this guy.


  90. Storagemanager
    90 | November 28, 2012 10:37 am

    Why do we often say ‘truth hurts’, ‘the hard truth’, ‘you can’t handle the truth’, etc? Truth in and of itself need not be hard to bear or painful. It is only after becoming accustomed to living in lies that it becomes such. In my humble experience I’ve found the more one accepts the truth it generally becomes enjoyable, soothing, even blissful. — Elliot Arnold


  91. buzzsawmonkey
    91 | November 28, 2012 10:37 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    For once, make Obama give up something before you fold the hand, okay, Boehner?

    Rodan wrote:

    He is too busy crying!

    While John Boehner Gently Weeps.


  92. 92 | November 28, 2012 10:38 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    with young, unmarried women, who are apparently easily duped into believing the stupidest crap imaginable.

    Santorum really did damage here. He gave the Dems ammo to use against republicans. Akins and Mourdock didn’t help.


  93. taxfreekiller
    93 | November 28, 2012 10:40 am

    “Little Green Lunch Room Lady”


  94. taxfreekiller
    94 | November 28, 2012 10:40 am

    LGLRL


  95. 95 | November 28, 2012 10:40 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Great song parody!


  96. eaglesoars
    96 | November 28, 2012 10:40 am

    THANK YOU FOR THIS THREAD.

    Busy today, can’t stop/talk but this is something I’lve been howling about for awhile, so thank you.

    Just a reminder -- thanks to Glenn Reynolds -- I completely forgot that 75 watt lightbulbs are banned as of Jan 1 -- so stock up.

    If anyone here lives in Michigan’s 6th -- Fred Upton is your congress person who promised to get rid of this nonsense and he’s done exactly squat. Pick up the fucking phone.


  97. 97 | November 28, 2012 10:40 am

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    “Little Green Lunch Room Lady”

    :lol:

    OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You are killing me!


  98. buzzsawmonkey
    98 | November 28, 2012 10:41 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    young, unmarried women, who are apparently easily duped into believing the stupidest crap imaginable.

    Look at who they go out with, and how many of them believe they can change the guy they’re dating, that he “doesn’t mean it” when he slaps them around, etc., etc.


  99. 99 | November 28, 2012 10:42 am

    @ Rodan:

    This was going to be the game plan for Obama’s re-election no matter what -- as I said yesterday -- that left-field birth control question to Romney by Stephanopolous. Then he says he “made a bet” with Diane Sawyer about asking the question when he was asked about it the next day. He couldn’t very well admit that the White House had told him to plant it.


  100. taxfreekiller
    100 | November 28, 2012 10:42 am

    If you do not agree with the LGLRL you get buggers in your oat meal, then deleted for all time.


  101. bluliner10
    101 | November 28, 2012 10:42 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ bluliner10:
    There are 60-year-old ponytailed, flannel-wearing surfers hanging around The Wedge that would be embarrassed by this guy.

    Well, then it just reminds me of a poet…Duvall who said…”Charlie don’t surf!”.


  102. 102 | November 28, 2012 10:43 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    My ex-husband hit me -- ONCE. His ass then made friends with my cast-iron roux pan.


  103. Storagemanager
    103 | November 28, 2012 10:44 am

    Is Mitt about to get revenge on the American people or does he just like kissing ass?

    President Barack Obama will host former Republican candidate Mitt Romney for a private lunch at the White House on Thursday, their first meeting since Obama defeated him in this month’s presidential election.

    The encounter follows Obama’s promise, in the aftermath of the Nov. 6 election, to consult the former Massachusetts governor before the end of the year. It also comes amid Obama’s efforts to work out with congressional leaders a way to avoid a looming “fiscal cliff” that could push the US economy back into recession.
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/1,7340,L-4312980,00.html


  104. 104 | November 28, 2012 10:44 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    This was going to be the game plan for Obama’s re-election no matter what — as I said yesterday — that left-field birth control question to Romney by Stephanopolous. Then he says he “made a bet” with Diane Sawyer about asking the question when he was asked about it the next day. He couldn’t very well admit that the White House had told him to plant it.

    The worse was Santorum jumped on that question and said he was OK with banning contraceptives. He went on about it for days. It was the WH plan because they knew that dork Santorum could not help himself.


  105. taxfreekiller
    105 | November 28, 2012 10:45 am

    “You there,, Iron Fist” back to the end of the line, do 100 push ups then get in line at the rear and then you must agree with my LGLRL crap or you get no lunch and all your post are mine.”


  106. 106 | November 28, 2012 10:46 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    Instead, we’ve kept blacks on “the short bus” for 50 years, thus imprinting on multiple generations the false idea that they’re incapable of making it on their own.

    Affirmative Action is predicated on black inferiority, yet blacks vigorously defend it and consider it “racist” to want to get rid of it!


  107. taxfreekiller
    107 | November 28, 2012 10:48 am

    McCain will pay for the food, Susan Collins will be the food server and Boner will cry and pray that King Obama will like them all now that they have learned to bow just like Obama does.@ Storagemanager:


  108. 108 | November 28, 2012 10:48 am

    @ taxfreekiller:

    She’s a very important person now!


  109. Storagemanager
    109 | November 28, 2012 10:49 am

    It’s almost like the Obama regime is coddling the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Via NRO:

    After the Egyptian president claimed unprecedented powers, prompting protests by various moderate and liberal factions across the country, the U.S. State Department has this to say:

    “As we called for last week, when confronted with concerns about the decree that he issued, President Morsi entered into discussions with the judiciary, with other stakeholders in Egypt. As I said, I think we don’t yet know what the outcome of those are going to be, but that’s a far cry from an autocrat just saying my way or the highway.”

    The emanations from State’s press secretary, Victoria Nuland, are downright surreal, and I delve into them more below.
    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/28/obama-state-department-defends-morsi-a-far-cry-from-an-autocrat/


  110. eaglesoars
    110 | November 28, 2012 10:50 am

    The bill to rescind the light bulb ban -- didn’t pass -- but it came out of the energy and commerce committee. Should have mentioned that.

    energy and commerce

    sorry to be a pain.

    as for Santorum -- I have spoken of him at length here. Whenever Hubby had to go to the Hill to meet with him, stomach cramps ensued. He treated people with contempt and disdain. Hubby wanted to punch his lights out.

    ok, I gotta go. Again, thanks for this thread.


  111. 111 | November 28, 2012 10:51 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    (You single guys should find out where they hang out on Saturday nights — I’m thinking they’ll believe you if you tell them they look just like Gwyneth Paltrow).

    Chrome won’t get you home, but it will get you laid! :mrgreen:


  112. 112 | November 28, 2012 10:53 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    He said he will stand with the Muslims. He did not lie!


  113. 113 | November 28, 2012 10:54 am

    @ Rodan:

    I’m sure @ Storagemanager:

    This inept administration has us hurtling forward in the WWIII Express Lane.

    In other news at Zip, via the AP:

    Iran is planning to build a nuclear bomb with at least triple the force of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima in World War II, diagrams obtained by the Associated Press indicates.According to AP, the diagrams were first discovered by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) scientists after an inspection of an Iranian nuclear facility. The document was published by the AP Tuesday after, the news agency said, it was leaked by officials critical of the way the West has been handling the Iran issue.

    Time for Israel to light the fires and kick the tires…..


  114. heysoos
    114 | November 28, 2012 10:54 am

    I hate this petty shit…another town, another cross gets canned

    http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/kansas-town-forced-to-remove-cross.html


  115. Storagemanager
    115 | November 28, 2012 10:55 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Storagemanager:
    He said he will stand with the Muslims. He did not lie!

    He is one…..I know it in my heart.


  116. 116 | November 28, 2012 10:56 am

    @ heysoos:

    Makes me sick. They tried to remove the cross at Mt. Davidson in San Francisco and lost. They did, however, remove the cross from the logo for Los Angeles (I guess the irony of removing a religious symbol for a the “City of Angels” is lost on them).


  117. Storagemanager
    117 | November 28, 2012 10:57 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Iran is planning to build a nuclear bomb with at least triple the force of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima in World War II,

    Ayatollah Khomeini… “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world”


  118. 118 | November 28, 2012 11:00 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    The fact that the filmmaker of the Islam video is being locked up over the silliest of pretenses tells me that he lusts after the power of the Islamofacist dictators in the ME and wishes he were one. Egypt, in a Cairo court, has issued a “death sentence” by the way, against all those involved in the video and they were tried in absentia. I will wait patiently for the outrage by this administration.


  119. Storagemanager
    119 | November 28, 2012 11:01 am

    Most Cubans have not paid taxes for half a century, but that will change under a new code starting January 1.The landmark regulations will change the relations of Cubans with their government and are a signal that market-oriented reforms, launched since President Raul Castro succeeded his brother, Fidel Castro, in 2008, are here to stay.

    The recently published code constitutes the first comprehensive taxation in Cuba since the 1959 revolution abolished just about all taxes.

    In the 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the country’s main benefactor, the Cuban government imposed a few scattered taxes, but mostly preferred to maintain low wages so it could fund free social services.

    The government’s free market reforms introduced over the last two years, are designed to encourage small businesses, private farming and individual initiative, along with plans to pay state workers more. Under the new tax code the state hopes to get its share of the proceeds.

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/49989684


  120. 120 | November 28, 2012 11:01 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    The Ayatollahs hate the Persian people. They want to destroy Iran, knowing it will be the Arab Caliphate that benefits.


  121. Storagemanager
    121 | November 28, 2012 11:02 am

    Storagemanager wrote:

    The government’s free market reforms introduced over the last two years, are designed to encourage small businesses, private farming and individual initiative, along with plans to pay state workers more. Under the new tax code the state hopes to get its share of the proceeds.

    Obama take note.


  122. Storagemanager
    122 | November 28, 2012 11:04 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Storagemanager:
    The Ayatollahs hate the Persian people. They want to destroy Iran, knowing it will be the Arab Caliphate that benefits.

    No…they really believe the Hidden Imam is on earth and Islam will rule the world.


  123. 123 | November 28, 2012 11:04 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Obama wantsIran to get nuclear weapons. He can't just give them to them, but he is doing everything in his power to keep Israel from interfering with their acquisition. And once Iran gets nukes, they will use them.Bare minimum, they grab Saudi Arabia and Mecca for themselves. Anschluss with Iraq is also likely. We have the bestest foreign policy in the world!


  124. bluliner10
    124 | November 28, 2012 11:05 am

    Storagemanager wrote:

    Carolina Girl wrote:
    Iran is planning to build a nuclear bomb with at least triple the force of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima in World War II,
    Ayatollah Khomeini… “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world”

    I think we need to let his land go up in smoke, rather we should help it.


  125. buzzsawmonkey
    125 | November 28, 2012 11:05 am

    Rodan wrote:

    He said he will stand with the Muslims. He did not lie!

    He bows to them, too.


  126. Storagemanager
    126 | November 28, 2012 11:05 am

    We may believe the hidden Imam is nonsense….they do NOT!


  127. Storagemanager
    127 | November 28, 2012 11:06 am

    bluliner10 wrote:

    I think we need to let his land go up in smoke, rather we should help it.

    Got President?


  128. heysoos
    128 | November 28, 2012 11:07 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    Makes me sick. They tried to remove the cross at Mt. Davidson in San Francisco and lost. They did, however, remove the cross from the logo for Los Angeles (I guess the irony of removing a religious symbol for a the “City of Angels” is lost on them).

    a number of years ago the ACLU came after Las Cruces, New Mexico for the same reason, the city logo…they told the ACLU to bring it on or fuck off…there was no more about it..why can’t people mind their own damned business?….these friggin militant atheists bore me to death


  129. buzzsawmonkey
    129 | November 28, 2012 11:07 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Obama wants Iran to get nuclear weapons.

    I’ve been saying this from the beginning, but there are still people who don’t believe it.


  130. Speranza
    130 | November 28, 2012 11:08 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    I imagine the way he smells would probably require a heavy dosing of Freshnet. Bathing might help, too

    Ewwwww. But you are most probably correct.


  131. Storagemanager
    131 | November 28, 2012 11:08 am

    Merry Christmas

    Colorado Springs Kicks Out Salvation Army for Panhandling http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/


  132. Speranza
    132 | November 28, 2012 11:09 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Carolina Girl:
    I think it was a combination of factors that did Romney in. I think 70% of Romney’s defeat is attributed to the Media-Entertainment Industry Complex. They have turn Obama into a cultural symbol.

    The Republican Party dragged Romney down.


  133. Storagemanager
    133 | November 28, 2012 11:09 am

    Politician in Norway: “Damn Jew Whores, Wish Hitler Could Come Back and Shower You Some More” http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/11/politician-in-norway-damn-jew-whores-wish-hitler-could-come-back-and-shower-you-some-more/


  134. Speranza
    134 | November 28, 2012 11:10 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ EBL:
    I believe he was spotted going into a Lane Bryant at the Fashion Island mall last year.

    Looking for a leisure suit.


  135. bluliner10
    135 | November 28, 2012 11:10 am

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    Obama wants Iran to get nuclear weapons.
    I’ve been saying this from the beginning, but there are still people who don’t believe it.

    I believe it.


  136. heysoos
    136 | November 28, 2012 11:10 am

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    Obama wants Iran to get nuclear weapons.
    I’ve been saying this from the beginning, but there are still people who don’t believe it.

    and I like to point out how many times he’s said he will not allow it…he just blurts out all sorts of crazy shit


  137. Storagemanager
    137 | November 28, 2012 11:11 am

    The United Nations is expected to pass a resolution on Thursday to admit the PLO as a non-member state and recognize the “right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967,” even though its regulations require a state to have a functioning government within borders under international agreement.

    The Palestinian Authority, the administrative body of the PLO, also does not satisfy U.N. requirements that it have a functioning government over the presumed borders. PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has ruled from the PA capital of Ramallah more than two years beyond the prescribed date for new presidential elections, and the legislature has not functioned for years following the Hamas parliamentary victory in the first and only parliamentary elections.
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/162629


  138. Speranza
    138 | November 28, 2012 11:11 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Where he really lost was with young, unmarried women, who are apparently easily duped into believing the stupidest crap imaginable.

    You can thanks assholes such as Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock for that.


  139. 139 | November 28, 2012 11:13 am

    @ heysoos:

    I hear ya -- I live in the land of Michael Newddowdolt, the Ninth Circuit and the Pledge of Allegiance.


  140. Speranza
    140 | November 28, 2012 11:13 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Santorum really did damage here. He gave the Dems ammo to use against republicans. Akins and Mourdock didn’t help.

    Until we get intelligent, focused, and disciplined candidates who know how to handle “gotcha” questions on rape/incest/abortion -- we will never take back the Senate.


  141. 141 | November 28, 2012 11:13 am

    @ Speranza:

    I look at him and visualize the line in “To Kill a Mockingbird” -- an overnight soaking had deprived him of protective layers of dirt.”


  142. Storagemanager
    142 | November 28, 2012 11:14 am

    European votes on PA statehood bid begin falling into place

    Germany will not back Palestinian bid for non-members status at General Assembly; Switzerland, Denmark join France in supporting PA’s unilateral move; UK to abstain unless PA promises to restart peace talks, avoid ICC. http://www.jpost.com/


  143. Speranza
    143 | November 28, 2012 11:14 am

    Rodan wrote:

    taxfreekiller wrote:
    “Little Green Lunch Room Lady”

    OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    You are killing me!

    Charles Johnson -- lunch room attendant -- now I can picture that!


  144. 144 | November 28, 2012 11:15 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Pakistan will defend the Sunni States. The most probably Nuke exchange will be Iran and Pakistan.


  145. texasam7
    145 | November 28, 2012 11:16 am

    @ Storagemanager:
    From the land that gave birth to Quisling.


  146. Speranza
    146 | November 28, 2012 11:16 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    This was going to be the game plan for Obama’s re-election no matter what — as I said yesterday — that left-field birth control question to Romney by Stephanopolous. Then he says he “made a bet” with Diane Sawyer about asking the question when he was asked about it the next day. He couldn’t very well admit that the White House had told him to plant it.

    Is it asking too much for the Stupid Party to insist on real journalists such as Bret Baier, Chris Wallace or Brit Hume moderate these “debates”?


  147. Storagemanager
    147 | November 28, 2012 11:16 am

    The Jerusalem Municipality awarded initial approval to a plan to rebuild the iconic Tiferet Israel synagogue in the Old City’s Jewish Quarter, a magnificent domed synagogue from the 19th century which was destroyed in the 1948 War of Independence.

    The project will recreate the three-story-tall synagogue as well as the iconic dome on the top, with only minor changes to the original, such as the introduction of an elevator to make the building more accessible. On Tuesday, the municipality’s Local Planning and Building Committee approved the plan for the next step of the process, where it must receive the approval of the Interior Ministry. An anonymous donor who has been active in previous rebuilding projects in the Old City donated nearly NIS 50 million needed for reconstruction, said Shlomi Attias, the Old City project manager for The Company for the Reconstruction and Development of the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem Ltd. (JQDC). The JQDC is a public company under the auspices of the Ministry of Construction and Housing. The synagogue is located just a few hundred meters from the Western Wall Plaza, in the same plaza as the Hurva. http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=293788


  148. buzzsawmonkey
    148 | November 28, 2012 11:17 am

    heysoos wrote:

    and I like to point out how many times he’s said he will not allow it…he just blurts out all sorts of crazy shit

    He has done nothing whatever to prevent Iran’s nuclear program: sanctions are a swiss-cheese joke. He has repeatedly refused to draw a “red line,” as Netanyahu has asked him to; he has certainly not attempted to coordinate a military response with or without Israel, or to issue any form of ultimatum. All he does is posture and blather.

    More telling, he sat silent with his thumbs up his ass during Iran’s “green revolution” which was a precursor to the “Arab Spring,” which he favors. Why did he do this? Because he did not want to offend the mullahs.

    It has been clear from the beginning that Obama has wanted to use the threat of Iranian nukes to force Israel to grant the “Palestinians” everything and more they have on their wish list; “only I can save you from them, but I will only do so if…” That the Iranians could not be trusted to keep such a bargain is immaterial—indeed, when they break such an agreement after he leaves office, as they surely will, he will gladly shed crocodile tears for Israel’s demise.


  149. 149 | November 28, 2012 11:17 am

    @ Speranza:

    Akin won his nomination via a push by Democrats to get him nominated and a “split” conservative vote. When he became a liability, he should immediately have put his own ambitions aside for the good of the country. But I don’t kid myself that these guys are in it for the altruism. Rubio and West, yes — Akin and Christie -- no.

    As for Mourdock -- no excuse of this, especially after Akin made that stupid rape remark. Learn the value of being the “strong, silent type.


  150. 150 | November 28, 2012 11:17 am

    @ Speranza:

    Until we get intelligent, focused, and disciplined candidates who know how to handle “gotcha” questions on rape/incest/abortion — we will never take back the Senate.

    I think its 2018 at the earliest we take back the Senate.


  151. Speranza
    151 | November 28, 2012 11:17 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ buzzsawmonkey:
    My ex-husband hit me — ONCE. His ass then made friends with my cast-iron roux pan.

    You should have introduced his gonads to your knee.


  152. 152 | November 28, 2012 11:18 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Akins thinks he was on a mission from God. Hence his political suffering will lead to a heavenly reward.


  153. Speranza
    153 | November 28, 2012 11:18 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Carolina Girl wrote:
    @ Rodan:
    This was going to be the game plan for Obama’s re-election no matter what — as I said yesterday — that left-field birth control question to Romney by Stephanopolous. Then he says he “made a bet” with Diane Sawyer about asking the question when he was asked about it the next day. He couldn’t very well admit that the White House had told him to plant it.

    The worse was Santorum jumped on that question and said he was OK with banning contraceptives. He went on about it for days. It was the WH plan because they knew that dork Santorum could not help himself.

    I hate that mother ****** Rick Santorum. I am glad he lost in 2006.


  154. buzzsawmonkey
    154 | November 28, 2012 11:19 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Akins thinks he was on a mission from God.

    One of the Blue-State Brothers?


  155. 155 | November 28, 2012 11:19 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    I will do you one further. I think Obama wants Israel and Iran to nuke each other so the Sunni Arab Muslim Brotherhood Caliphate dominates the Mideast. With Israel and Iran out of the way, there will be nothing stopping the Caliphate.


  156. buzzsawmonkey
    156 | November 28, 2012 11:20 am

    @ heysoos:

    Oh, and don’t forget that his Communist Svengali, Valerie Jarrett, is Iranian-born.


  157. 157 | November 28, 2012 11:20 am

    @ Speranza:

    What’s the definition of “insanity” again? Repeating the same behavior hoping for a different result. Every debate season the GOP agrees to these twits moderating debates and every debate season they get burned. But every time they thing this’ll be the year the media likes them.


  158. 158 | November 28, 2012 11:20 am

    @ Speranza:

    I wish someone would knock that stupid smirk off his face. It is crazy that many people love this guy. He’s a Socialist!


  159. 159 | November 28, 2012 11:21 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    What’s the definition of “insanity” again? Repeating the same behavior hoping for a different result. Every debate season the GOP agrees to these twits moderating debates and every debate season they get burned. But every time they thing this’ll be the year the media likes them.

    They don’t get it. The GOP elites live in a bubble. Losers like Karl Rove are taken seriously.


  160. buzzsawmonkey
    160 | November 28, 2012 11:22 am

    Rodan wrote:

    I will do you one further. I think Obama wants Israel and Iran to nuke each other so the Sunni Arab Muslim Brotherhood Caliphate dominates the Mideast. With Israel and Iran out of the way, there will be nothing stopping the Caliphate.

    Interesting; a Little Black Sambo foreign policy. He sits in the tree while the “tigers” race around it until they turn into radioactive dust.


  161. Speranza
    161 | November 28, 2012 11:23 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Akin won his nomination via a push by Democrats to get him nominated and a “split” conservative vote. When he became a liability, he should immediately have put his own ambitions aside for the good of the country. But I don’t kid myself that these guys are in it for the altruism. Rubio and West, yes — Akin and Christie — no.
    As for Mourdock — no excuse of this, especially after Akin made that stupid rape remark. Learn the value of being the “strong, silent type.

    I agree on both your points. I also blame Mike Shmuckabee for not telling Akin to take one for the team and withdraw. Mourdock has got to be the spawn of a marriage between first cousins since he walked right into the trap.


  162. 162 | November 28, 2012 11:24 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Here’s the sinister reason. Obama views Jews and Persians as Whites. He views Arabs as his Black brothers. Have the 2 white nations in the Mideast destroy each other so his Black Arab Brothers take over.

    I could be wrong, but that is my theory.


  163. 163 | November 28, 2012 11:24 am

    @ Rodan:

    One of the points Andrew McCarthy makes in his book “The Great Jihad” is that the bow by Obama to the Saudi King was no “mistake” -- this king controls the holy cities of Mecca and Medina and is a high and mighty person to Muslims worthy of deference and respect.

    I think he has a pro-Islam agenda -- I mean, really, look at the ridiculous statements he makes about the Muslim contributions over American history (yeah -- always involving the deaths of civilians, and the infringement of Christian’s constitutional rights in Dearborn) and NASA’s “Muslim outreach mission”.


  164. Speranza
    164 | November 28, 2012 11:24 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    What’s the definition of “insanity” again? Repeating the same behavior hoping for a different result. Every debate season the GOP agrees to these twits moderating debates and every debate season they get burned. But every time they thing this’ll be the year the media likes them.

    Rodan wrote:

    They don’t get it. The GOP elites live in a bubble. Losers like Karl Rove are taken seriously

    There is a good reason why they are referred to as “The Stupid Party”.


  165. 165 | November 28, 2012 11:25 am

    @ Rodan:

    That wouldn’t really hurt my feelings. I am mostly worried about nuclear terrorism, though. Either against us or against Israel or both. They can build a bomb that’ll fit in a shipping container right now. They’ve probably got the requisite materials for it. The only reason to suspect that they don’t have nuclear weapons is that they haven’t used them.


  166. Storagemanager
    166 | November 28, 2012 11:25 am

    @ Speranza:
    I call him Huck A Buck.


  167. 167 | November 28, 2012 11:25 am

    @ Speranza:

    If someone were to publicly knock out Santorum on TV, I would set up a legal fund.


  168. Speranza
    168 | November 28, 2012 11:25 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    One of the points Andrew McCarthy makes in his book “The Great Jihad” is that the bow by Obama to the Saudi King was no “mistake” — this king controls the holy cities of Mecca and Medina and is a high and mighty person to Muslims worthy of deference and respect.

    I think he has a pro-Islam agenda — I mean, really, look at the ridiculous statements he makes about the Muslim contributions over American history (yeah — always involving the deaths of civilians, and the infringement of Christian’s constitutional rights in Dearborn) and NASA’s “Muslim outreach mission”.

    He really is an Islamophile. I belvieve he is an atheist at heart but has a real soft spot for “Third World” Muslims.


  169. Speranza
    169 | November 28, 2012 11:26 am

    Storagemanager wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    I call him Huck A Buck.

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    If someone were to publicly knock out Santorum on TV, I would set up a legal fund.

    Don’t physically hurt him, just slap and humiliate him


  170. 170 | November 28, 2012 11:26 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    That wouldn’t really hurt my feelings. I am mostly worried about nuclear terrorism, though. Either against us or against Israel or both. They can build a bomb that’ll fit in a shipping container right now. They’ve probably got the requisite materials for it. The only reason to suspect that they don’t have nuclear weapons is that they haven’t used them.

    Iran getting a bomb will lead to The Sunnis getting a bomb. You best bet Al-Qaeda will get a Bomb from the Sunnis and Hizballah from Iran. An Iranian Nuke will set of a chain reaction.


  171. Storagemanager
    171 | November 28, 2012 11:27 am

    @ Carolina Girl:
    I think Obama wants rid of the KING and the Muslim brother form the CALIPHATE.


  172. 172 | November 28, 2012 11:27 am

    @ Speranza:

    Just get that smirk off his face. I think Santorum is a paid agent of George Soros. How does he make a living? No one ever investigates this.


  173. buzzsawmonkey
    173 | November 28, 2012 11:28 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Here’s the sinister reason. Obama views Jews and Persians as Whites. He views Arabs as his Black brothers. Have the 2 white nations in the Mideast destroy each other so his Black Arab Brothers take over.

    I could be wrong, but that is my theory.

    Interesting. Hadn’t occurred to me, but possible.


  174. 174 | November 28, 2012 11:28 am

    By the way, appropos of nothing, I really wish the credit rating agencies would announce what the effect raising the debt ceiling would have on the United States credit rating before the vote on raising the ceiling. Instead, when they lower it after the vote, it will attributed to the debate over the raising, rather than the result.

    Of course, didn’t Obama’s DOJ threaten them with investigation when they lowered the rating last time. The criminal enterprise thinks it can intimidate and threaten at will.


  175. 175 | November 28, 2012 11:30 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    I remember how his radio show was going to be a serious threat to Rush Limbaugh. Rush’s audience is just fine and everyone I know hates Huckabee’s show.


  176. 176 | November 28, 2012 11:30 am

    @ buzzsawmonkey:

    Your theory and mine do not contradict each other. One does not rule out the other.


  177. Storagemanager
    177 | November 28, 2012 11:30 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Iron Fist wrote:
    @ Rodan:
    That wouldn’t really hurt my feelings. I am mostly worried about nuclear terrorism, though. Either against us or against Israel or both. They can build a bomb that’ll fit in a shipping container right now. They’ve probably got the requisite materials for it. The only reason to suspect that they don’t have nuclear weapons is that they haven’t used them.

    Iran getting a bomb will lead to The Sunnis getting a bomb. You best bet Al-Qaeda will get a Bomb from the Sunnis and Hizballah from Iran. An Iranian Nuke will set of a chain reaction.

    Iran will use the bomb….listen to the words…we need chaos in order for the Mahdi to rule….they tell us the plan….WE refuse to listen.


  178. 178 | November 28, 2012 11:32 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Huckabee has a show? It has to be about as popular as Randi Rhodes was, because I’ve never heard of it.


  179. 179 | November 28, 2012 11:33 am

    @ Storagemanager:

    Yup, they think a huke war will bring in the Mahdi.


  180. 180 | November 28, 2012 11:33 am

    @ Speranza:

    Obama knows no other god before himself, but he does indeed have a soft spot for the Mohammedans. It is clear from his every action.


  181. taxfreekiller
    181 | November 28, 2012 11:33 am

    The Two Party Evil Money Cult In Washington D.C. All Members Of The Low Bow Institute Of Cowards.


  182. 182 | November 28, 2012 11:35 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Carolina Girl:
    @ Speranza:

    I woukld love to set up a 4 person politician cage match.

    Bout 1: Huckabee vs. Santorum
    Bout 2: Jeb “Porky” Bush vs. Chris “the fake Guido” Christie

    Then the winner of those 2 face of in a final match. The winner takes on Hillary “Super Thighs” Clinton.

    :evil:


  183. 183 | November 28, 2012 11:35 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Obama knows no other god before himself, but he does indeed have a soft spot for the Mohammedans. It is clear from his every action.

    He loves Islam.


  184. taxfreekiller
    184 | November 28, 2012 11:36 am

    Some one needs to put together a flow chart of the lies on Bengazie.

    Should be a dozie.


  185. 185 | November 28, 2012 11:36 am

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    The Two Party Evil Money Cult In Washington D.C. All Members Of The Low Bow Institute Of Cowards.

    I think George P Bush wants to get his feet wet in politics so in 2018 he challenges Ted Cruz for his senate seat.


  186. taxfreekiller
    186 | November 28, 2012 11:37 am

    Obama is the result of a gene pool of lies.


  187. Storagemanager
    187 | November 28, 2012 11:37 am

    Iran stated they could force the return of Mahdi…in order for the return there must be chaos on Earth…Shia prophecy states Baghdad and Syria will both be destroyed before the return of the Mahdi….we have western minds….we do not think like they do or we would understand they are telling us the truth.,…they want war and destruction..


  188. 188 | November 28, 2012 11:38 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Cumulus Broadcasting launched him back in April on their stations when the contracts with Rush ran out. In San Francisco, KSFO took Rush off and put on Huckabee and Rush went to a lesser station -- and he STILL beats him by 143% in the 9-12 slot. Plus we can get Rush live on 580, a 50,000 watt station from Fresno.


  189. taxfreekiller
    189 | November 28, 2012 11:39 am

    @ Rodan:
    Do not think the kid can even get elected as Land Comm. that he is after now.

    But ya never know until the money flows.


  190. 190 | November 28, 2012 11:40 am

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Do not think the kid can even get elected as Land Comm. that he is after now.
    But ya never know until the money flows.

    I hope you guys work to defeat him!


  191. 191 | November 28, 2012 11:42 am

    Keeping on topic, over at LGF!

    361 Obdicut Wed, Nov 28, 2012 8:14:25am

    2
    down
    up
    report

    re: #355 Gus

    To be fair, they have shitloads of old white men. That’s pretty much the GOP.


  192. Storagemanager
    192 | November 28, 2012 11:43 am

    SHOCKED….( not )

    Russia to Vote in Favor of PA Bid at UN

    Russia will vote in favor of granting upgraded status to the Palestinians at the United Nations, the foreign ministry said Wednesday.

    “The Russian Federation will vote for this resolution based on our principled position,” the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement ahead of the vote in the world body’s General Assembly on Thursday
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/256203


  193. Tanker
    193 | November 28, 2012 11:56 am

    My take on the whole budget debate.

    Give Obama and the dems everything they want. Don’t vote for it, just don’t stop it. The one thing we get is a public statement from the President, Dem Senators and Democrap reps stating the following:

    “Any consequences resulting from our actions is the sole responsibility of the President and the Democrat Party”

    Make the bastards own it, lock, stock and barrel! They are going to get it anyway from what I’m seeing, but as it stands now the republicans will carry much of the blame when the shit hits the fan!


  194. Speranza
    194 | November 28, 2012 11:59 am

    Rodan wrote:

    Keeping on topic, over at LGF!

    361 Obdicut Wed, Nov 28, 2012 8:14:25am
    2
    down
    up
    report
    re: #355 Gus
    To be fair, they have shitloads of old white men. That’s pretty much the GOP.

    Obdicunt is an inbred moron.


  195. Speranza
    195 | November 28, 2012 11:59 am

    Rodan wrote:

    I think George P Bush wants to get his feet wet in politics so in 2018 he challenges Ted Cruz for his senate seat.

    I hope that every Bush gets crushed.


  196. Speranza
    196 | November 28, 2012 12:00 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Obama knows no other god before himself, but he does indeed have a soft spot for the Mohammedans. It is clear from his every action.

    He identifies them as being the oppressed when they are in actuality the oppressors.


  197. 197 | November 28, 2012 12:01 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Same here!


  198. Speranza
    198 | November 28, 2012 12:02 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    @ Carolina Girl:
    @ Speranza:
    I woukld love to set up a 4 person politician cage match.
    Bout 1: Huckabee vs. Santorum
    Bout 2: Jeb “Porky” Bush vs. Chris “the fake Guido” Christie
    Then the winner of those 2 face of in a final match. The winner takes on Hillary “Super Thighs” Clinton.

    Chris Christie would be the Haystacks Calhoun of that match.


  199. 199 | November 28, 2012 12:02 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Islam is the world’s most successful totalitarian movement.


  200. 200 | November 28, 2012 12:02 pm

    @ Speranza:

    :lol:


  201. 201 | November 28, 2012 12:02 pm

    Remind me again how the GOP is homophobic:

    Just after 6am, on “Morning Joe” this morning, Joe, Mika and guest John Heilemann were talking about yesterday’sNew York Times article about “the three amigos” Senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham, who have bonded over the last decade through international travel putting themselves at the center of the foreign policy debate at home.

    With Lieberman leaving the Senate, McCain and Graham have brought in another “amigo” SenatorKelly Ayotte. That prompted Heilemann to make a bad joke, at the expense of Graham:

    “Heilemann: They need a third amigo at all times. So now they have — now two of the three are women — now at least one of the three are women.”

    That drew hysterical laughter from Scarborough who had to turn his chair around. Mika Brzezinski took over and brought in Andrea Mitchell as Scarborough and Heilemann composed themselves.

    It seems to me every time gays are belittled or a politician is “accused” of gay activity, the finger pointing and jokes are done by those “oh so tolerant” libturds.

    I’m such the Race/Homophobe Detective pictured above will be all over this today.


  202. Speranza
    202 | November 28, 2012 12:03 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Speranza:
    Same here!

    I want to see them humiliated and discredited.


  203. 203 | November 28, 2012 12:03 pm

    New thread.


  204. Speranza
    204 | November 28, 2012 12:04 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    That drew hysterical laughter from Scarborough who had to turn his chair around. Mika Brzezinski took over and brought in Andrea Mitchell as Scarborough and Heilemann composed themselves.

    Andrea Mitchell -- that buffoon needs to go on early retirement.


  205. buzzsawmonkey
    205 | November 28, 2012 12:04 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    I hope that every Bush gets crushed.

    Obviously, you’ve seen the New York City Parks Department at work.


  206. 206 | November 28, 2012 12:05 pm

    @ Speranza:

    Check out the comment I referenced in the next thread!


  207. 207 | November 28, 2012 12:09 pm

    @ Speranza:

    If we’re doing cage matches, I’ll take on Andrea Mitchell -- battle of the blousy blondes!


  208. buzzsawmonkey
    208 | November 28, 2012 12:11 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    If we’re doing cage matches, I’ll take on Andrea Mitchell — battle of the blousy blondes!

    I want to sell tickets to the Chris Christie-Michael Moore sumo bout!


  209. RIX
    209 | November 28, 2012 12:17 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    If you look at Susan Rice on Wiki, she has always feared that her
    accomplishments would be attributed to Affirmative Action.
    Rightly so.

    And that may be the problem. At the very least
    it is for her boss.


  210. 210 | November 28, 2012 12:25 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    MacDuff wrote:
    Sure, we’re always going to have differing races and source ethnicities
    Yes, bt you no longer see prejudice against the Irish, Italians, Poles, or other groups that were discriminated against every bit as much as blacks 100 years ago, nor do you see ethnic grievance groups from these groups. Instead, they are now all the hated “white man”. The Conservative goal is that none of these grievance groups exist. That we truly become a society where people are judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not surprisingly, the Democrats want exactly the opposite. They’d bring back Jim Crow, just change the color of the skin discriminated against. Look at how they place Susan Rice above question because she is nominally black.

    She’s no darker than most of us!

    Oh, and btw, people STILL hate Serbs -- at least, those who have Muslim contacts or who are old enough to remember the 1990s.


  211. 211 | November 28, 2012 12:26 pm

    buzzsawmonkey wrote:

    Carolina Girl wrote:
    If we’re doing cage matches, I’ll take on Andrea Mitchell — battle of the blousy blondes!

    I want to sell tickets to the Chris Christie-Michael Moore sumo bout!

    I would pay money NOT to have to watch that.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David