Nothing so obnoxious as the bigoted use of the description “old white guys” or just plain “white males” being used so casually. A pasty faced, aging, paunchy, white blogger who used to be somewhat relevant has indicated his self loathing by constantly referring to “old, white males” without seeing the irony of that statement.
by James Taranto
Everytime [sic] I think the Democratic race card players could not get more vile, more deranged, more patronizingly demeaning to blacks, someone manages to defy even my vivid imagination,” thunders blogger William Jacobson. He’s referring to a passage in a Washington Posteditorial about critics of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice–a passage that in our view is useful for its clarity.
At issue is a Nov. 19 letter to the President Obama, written by Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina and signed by 97 House Republicans, which declares that the signatories are “deeply troubled” that the president is considering nominating Rice secretary of state, and that they “strongly oppose” such a nomination.
[..........]
The Post focuses on the critics rather than their choice of words. Here’s the passage that outrages Jacobson: “Could it be, as members of the Congressional Black Caucus are charging, that the signatories of the letter are targeting Ms. Rice because she is an African American woman? The signatories deny that, and we can’t know their hearts. What we do know is that more than 80 of the signatories are white males, and nearly half are from states of the former Confederacy.”
Let’s examine this argument carefully. The Post acknowledges that “we can’t know their hearts.” But it finds a (literally) prima facie reason to suspect them of invidious motives: Almost all of them are persons of pallor. The Post is casting aspersions on Duncan and his colleagues based explicitly on the color of their skin. And it is accusing them of racism!
A couple of other items related to race and politics caught our attention over the Thanksgiving weekend. First, Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., an Illinois Democrat and CBC member, resigned from Congress “amid federal ethics investigations and a diagnosis of mental illness,” as the Chicago Tribune reports. That sets up a special election to fill the vacancy:
[........]
This passes with neither editorial comment nor a disapproving quote. It’s hard to imagine the same absence of reaction if a group of pols offered “to broker a nominee” with the goal of preventing a black candidate from winning a white-majority district.Then there’s the email from the Obama campaign–yeah, they’re still coming, though at a slower pace than before the election–inviting supporters to take a survey. Among the questions: “Which constituency groups do you identify yourself with? Select all that apply.”
There are 22 boxes you can check off. Some are ideological (“Environmentalists” and perhaps “Labor”), some occupational (“Educators,” “Healthcare professionals”), some regional (“Americans abroad,” “Rural Americans”). There’s a box for “Women” but none for men, though there’s a separate “Gender” question, which hilariously has three options: “Male,” “Female” and “Other/no answer.” Touré will no doubt soon inveigh against the “otherization” of the Gender No. 3.
What caught our attention were the ethnic categories: “African Americans,” “Arab-Americans,” “Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders,” Jewish Americans,” “Latinos” and “Native Americans” (the last, of course, refers to American Indians, not natural-born citizens).
[........]
One explanation for the absence of a “white” or “European-American” category (or, alternatively, several dozen specific European ethnicities) could be that whites tend to vote Republican, and the campaign is interested in Democratic-leaning voting blocs. But several other of the Obama survey categories lean toward the GOP, too: “People of faith,” “Rural Americans,” “Seniors,” “Small business owners” and “Veterans/military families.” Counterpart groups that are Democratic-leaning or swing-voting are missing from the list, too, including nonbelievers, urban and suburban dwellers, and the middle-aged (though there are categories for both “Young professionals” and “Youth”).
The reason for the absence of a “Whites” category is that white identity politics is all but nonexistent in America today. That wasn’t always the case, of course: For a century after the Civil War, Southern white supremacists were an important part of the Democratic Party coalition. They were defeated and discredited in the 1960s, and the Democrats, still the party of identity politics, switched their focus to various nonwhite minorities.
Obama’s re-election was a triumph for this new identity politics–but the Post’s nasty editorial hints at a reason to think this form of politics may have long-term costs for both the party and the country.
The trouble with a diverse coalition based on ethnic or racial identity is that solidarity within each group can easily produce conflicts among the groups. Permissive immigration policies, for example, may be good for Hispanics and Asians but bad for blacks. Racial preferences in college admissions help blacks and Hispanics at the expense of Asians.
One way of holding together such a disparate coalition is by delivering prosperity, so that everyone can feel he’s doing well. Failing that, another way is by identifying a common adversary–such as the “white male.” During Obama’s first term, the demonization of the “white male” was common among left-liberal commentators, especially MSNBC types. The Post has now lent its considerably more mainstream institutional voice to this form of bigotry.
This seems likely to weaken the taboo against white identity politics. Whites who are not old enough to remember the pre-civil-rights era–Rep. Duncan, for instance, was born in 1966–have every reason to feel aggrieved by being targeted in this way.
The danger to Democrats is that they still need white votes. According to this year’s exit polls, Obama won re-election while receiving only 39% of the white vote. But that’s higher than Mitt Romney’s percentage among blacks (6%), Latinos (27%), Asian-Americans (26%) or “Other” (38%). It’s true that Republicans suffer electorally for the perception that they are hostile to minorities, but Democrats also stand to suffer for being hostile to whites.
The danger for the country is that a racially polarized electorate will produce a hostile, balkanized culture. In 2008 Obama held out the hope of a postracial America. His re-election raises the possibility of a most-racial America.
Read the rest - Most-racial America
Tags: James Taranto
OMG. Romneys final share of popular vote is 47%
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/26/romneys-final-share-of-the-vote-you-guessed-it-47-percent/
more proof the internet is making people hysterical
@ heysoos:
How so? We are seeig racism at levels not seen in my lifetime, not from whites, but from anti-white minorities.
Iron Fist wrote:
the reference was to our pal furb…my bad
Iron Fist wrote:
and btw, I agree with you
@ heysoos:
I see. Yeah, Ferby is a little touched…
@ Iron Fist:
@ heysoos:
Trouble is it has been around for a very long time. PC, tolerance, and good taste misguided me to just let it go. It was just until relatively recently has it become so toxic and a staple of mainstream demoncrapic discourse and strategy, that I could not ignore or laugh it off any more. My tolerance for it is at an end, be it the so-called comedy of Garrett Morris or Tyler Perry sitcoms, to obvious anti-white assaults by black mobs.
Why is there a picture of a grub at the top of the thread?
Heavy Petting Zoos: animal prostitution in Germany.
ferb123 wrote:
Hardly a blow out scheisskopf!
Looking at that photo of Charles Johnson all I can say is that I would not want any little children to be around him.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Diversity! That is the natural end of Left-wing diversity efforts. They would have no standards of decency, because they are indecent people.
47% means that it is a divided country.
Speranza wrote:
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Speranza wrote:
looks rodentesque to me….beedy eyed
Iron Fist wrote:
The Civil Rights Movement challenged the larger society to confront and address the entrenched racism that did indeed exist there. But the hijacking of that movement by the Left ensured that while the white community was working to eliminate racism and render expressions of it unacceptable, the black community did no such thing. For forty years it has been doubling down on the racism that already existed there, and fostering resentment and a victim mentality. The Left has protected this by claiming that “racism” is not prejudice based on race, but a function of “who has the power”—and, since it defined blacks/women/gays, indeed, anyone and everything except white males, as “not having the power,” these entrenched bigotries have not only never been addressed, but have been exacerbated.
Real Islam
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Well that’s changed
@ Storagemanager:
Then lets oblige him…
Move over Chuck Norris
MikeA wrote:
Got President?
Storagemanager wrote:
Unfortunately, no…
@ Storagemanager:
I took Krav Maga.
Iron Fist wrote:
All created by Progressive whites. That is the irony of this.
Speranza wrote:
He’s a very disgusting looking.
Rodan wrote:
he looks like a pervert.
Rodan wrote:
Self hating white people.
Speranza wrote:
It means the Republcians better get their act together. If they nominate Jeb, Christie, Santorum or Huckabee, they will be lucky to get 37% next time since many will split off.
@ Speranza:
I don’t think they are self hating. They view themselves as more enlightened Whites hence Post Race. They view NOn whites as their slaves and use them for power.
@ Speranza:
He looks souless.
@ Speranza:
No, they don’t hate themselves. They are mostly the children of privilege, and they are very protective of that privilege. Like the people who claim they want taxes to go up, they mean to decry “white privilege” for other people. White privilege now being defined as lacking discrimination in favor of certain minorities. But they don’t want to give up their place at the top of the pile. The Kennedys and the Kerreys of this world are the model for this.
Rodan wrote:
Santorum is already begging to run…no class at all
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Well said. I don’t think I have seen a better description of the problem.
@ Iron Fist:
Totally true, that. As long as they rule the roost, the eloi are content.
Iron Fist wrote:
Bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
They view themselves as enlightened feudal lords!
texasam7 wrote:
Read Plato’s the Republic, it is the blueprint.
@ Rodan:
After reading books like “Inside The Third Reich”, I was struck by the banality of evil and how ordinary it can look. Sometimes, it’s just a complete lack of empathy that can allow someone to commit the worst atrocities.
@ texasam7:
well hey there newnic
pull up a chair and sit a spell
oh yeah
please don’t crap on the floor
The Left continues to justify its anti-white racism by pointing to its ever-swelling hatred as a self-fulfilling prophecy; claiming to be all about “peace and love,” they clearly could not hate whites generally, and white males in particular, unless there were reasons for doing so.
In fact, however, this hatred exists and metastasizes in inverse proportion to any actual issue. Look at the black commentators in the media; Toure, Michael Eric Dyson, Cornel West—the entire rogue’s gallery. A very few, such as West, are old enough to have experienced the last dying gasps of Jim Crow in their earliest childhood, but most have not; and, indeed, all have benefited handsomely from the larger society’s efforts to eliminate even the tiniest vestigial legacy of race prejudice. Yet these people, and their unhinged race-baiting fellow travelers such as Chris Matthews, cannot let a day go by without decrying prejudices and societal disabilities which have long ceased to exist, in any meaningful way.
Their cries of “racism” are in inverse proportion to racism’s actual existence, as their hatred of “white privilege” is in inverse proportion to its actual existence; they must maintain the fiction of these things to justify their own privilege.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
All true. The worship of “diversity” is what I find particularly dangerous (and annoying), it’s fractured our culture into countless groups and sub groups, all with some manner of grievance or perceived grievance. Sure, we’re always going to have differing races and source ethnicities, but our strength has always been our ability to absorb these differences with the various parts becoming one with the whole and the whole being enhanced and improved by the process. I’ll stipulate it was never particularly easy or quick, but immigrants strove to assimilate into our culture and our culture evolved accordingly.
Not only does assimilation seem to have fallen out of favor with some immigrants groups, we are seeing native-born Americans de-assimilating, forming ethnicity-based enclaves that delight in being perpetually at odds with the larger culture. This is becoming increasingly evident in national elections with, what seems to be an ever-lengthening list of groups that demand their issues to be addressed -- even though “Issues” are pretty homogenous across racial/ethnic lines.
Rodan wrote:
Good point. In fact they are narcissists who want the easy life so for them it is easier to trash their own race.
Rodan wrote:
That’s precisely the word I had in mind.
Rodan wrote:
He has no character and looking into his beady eyes you can tell.
Iron Fist wrote:
That is why I have no problems on raising taxes on the rich -- they all voted for Obama in the hopes that the Republicans will not approve any tax increases for them.
Rodan wrote:
It’s curious that those who claim to be “post racial” have a near psychotic obsession with race.
MacDuff wrote:
The very definition of racism.
MacDuff wrote:
Again—you have to understand the language. Just as “diversity” means “surface differences of appearance masking an enforced lockstep uniformity of thought,” “post-racial” does not mean “getting past racial differences”—far from it.
To any sane person, unmarinated in Leftist jargon, “post-racial” would mean “getting past racial differences.” But that is not what the Left means by it. Since in Leftist World white people are always racist, whether consciously or not, and black people are always the non-racist victims, regardless of the level of power or privilege or wealth they attain, “post-racial” means “deposing the racists and having the non-racists run things.”
In other words, Obama was very consciously sold to the American people on a “post-racial” basis by people who knew that the term would be taken as reconciliatory by most people of good will. They, however, used the term to mean something wholly different from reconciliation; they used it as the code-word for the establishment of a revanchist regime based upon the principle of “we’re in charge, now we’re gonna get ours.” And that is what we have.
In other words, the entire Obama sales effort was a matter of race-bait-and-switch.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Post Racial = Post White
@ MacDuff:
They are racists, but a slicker version of it. White Progressives envision a racial caste system.
MacDuff wrote:
Yes, bt you no longer see prejudice against the Irish, Italians, Poles, or other groups that were discriminated against every bit as much as blacks 100 years ago, nor do you see ethnic grievance groups from these groups. Instead, they are now all the hated “white man”. The Conservative goal is that none of these grievance groups exist. That we truly become a society where people are judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not surprisingly, the Democrats want exactly the opposite. They’d bring back Jim Crow, just change the color of the skin discriminated against. Look at how they place Susan Rice above question because she is nominally black.
@ Speranza:
@ MacDuff:
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I know coworker who saw Lincoln. She was surprised that he was a Republican. She was talking with someone else and I overheard her saying “I didn’t know Republicans were against slavery. They really changed and are like Nazis now.” Those were exact words. I did not say anything because I did not want to blow my cover.
This is the mentality we are dealing with.
@ Speranza:
I have no problems raising the taxes on the real rich, but those whom Obama calls rich are mostly upper middle class (doctors and lawyers and such) or small businesses that pay taxes as individuals because they are so small. It is the latter that is the most troubling. Unemployment is at a real rate of about 11%, and they want to raise taxes on small businesses? Repoublicans don’t make that arguement, though. It is as though they want to lose. The real rich, the Kerreys and Kennedys, will continue to only pay nominal amounts, though. I’d put a sur-tax on trust fund disbursements. Say 50%. Hit them where they live.
@ Iron Fist:
In a Latin country, Rice would not be
whiteBlack. She would be considered Mix race. Actually the biggest joke is that the majority of Black Americans are NOT Black!@ Iron Fist:
I say Republicans should put tax raises at 1 Million dollars. Also a 30% excise tax on Entertainment industry profits.
Good morning. That is really a nice picture of Johnson.
The guy stays is shape & dresses well./
RIX wrote:
This picture is nearly 3 years old. I can imagine how much worse he looks.
I am willing to give Chunky Boo Boo a pass on this. With his moobs and obvious mood swings, he may be hormonally closer to female than male.
EBL wrote:
@ Rodan:
You can’t cure stupid…
The great news keeps on coming!
Will Italy Need a Bailout in 2013?
Iron Fist wrote:
The Media-Entertainment Industry Complex! Until this is addressed we can come up with the greatest ideas in the world and nothing will come out of it.
Rodan wrote:
No doubt there has not been a positive transformation.
That person up top, the one in the photo, is that of a high school lunch room lady, sure looks like one I remember.
@ heysoos:
He looks like what Greg Gutfeld calls, ironically, “frilly lizards assuming human form.”
Iron Fist wrote:
All of these groups found a way to make their place in our culture and, as I said above, our culture was the better for it. The Irish were the lowest of the low in NYC and were forced to do jobs that were not exactly preferred -- being cops and firemen. Irish cops and firemen became part of the lore of New York and many of them trace their cop/fireman roots back for generations. The number of Irish names on the list of those firemen killed on 9/11 is rather breathtaking.
These groups assimilated on their own and they’re now as much a part of America as those who can trace their roots to the Mayflower. I’m convinced that, had the Civil Rights movement stopped at guaranteeing rights and allowed our culture to do what it always has done we would have been much better off. Instead, we’ve kept blacks on “the short bus” for 50 years, thus imprinting on multiple generations the false idea that they’re incapable of making it on their own.
All Hail King Obama.
Strangleflation is his goal.
taxfreekiller wrote:
OMG!
Rodan wrote:
I imagine the way he smells would probably require a heavy dosing of Freshnet. Bathing might help, too.
Rodan wrote:
He is not an “old white guy” notice the very hip flannel shirt and pony tails. Very modern. The very embodiment of manhood. I for one would follow him into a burning building…oh wait it is November 28th and not April 1st…sorry scratch all that.
@ Rodan:
Yep. If you want to know what happened to Romney, all you need do is read the threads at Free Republic. I get what they’re saying as far as we’re sick of non-conservative candidates, but how about put it aside just this once and get a very dangerous man out of the White House and let him take his criminal enterprise with him?
Rodan wrote:
“Race” is pseudoscience.
It is a clumsy classification system based upon appearance that came into being when appearance was the most readily available means of classification. Yes, there are various genetic markers which show up differently in the various “races”—but since Frenchmen tend to look like Frenchmen, Germans like Germans, and Poles like Poles, there are doubtless similar markers, whether currently detectable or not, that would show up in all manner of subdivisions of each “race,” should anyone care to look for them.
It was the racist Democrats who promulgated the “one drop rule,” and disputes over whether someone was a quadroon or an octoroon or a macaroon. Why play their game by discussing whether someone is “black” or not?
If you look at Susan Rice on Wiki, she has always feared that her
accomplishments would be attributed to Affirmative Action.
I can understand that, but you can’t have it both ways and
hide behind race now.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I agree, the race crap is pseudoscience. Then again, the Left loves pseudoscience!
@ bluliner10:
bluliner10 wrote:
Didn’t they wear pony tails 40 years ago?
@ Rodan:
If Boehner and the conservatives are serious -- they should ask Obama -- show us your plan first.
THEN, and only then, tell him they’ll raise taxes on the “1%” -- but only for those making over $1,000,000 a year. Period. None of this $250,000 stuff, or even $500,000 stuff. Then tell him in return, the budgets of every federal department -- EXCEPT defense -- be cut 10%.
And elimination of the Earned Income Tax Credit.
For once, make Obama give up something before you fold the hand, okay, Boehner?
@ Carolina Girl:
I think it was a combination of factors that did Romney in. I think 70% of Romney’s defeat is attributed to the Media-Entertainment Industry Complex. They have turn Obama into a cultural symbol.
@ EBL:
I believe he was spotted going into a Lane Bryant at the Fashion Island mall last year.
@ Carolina Girl:
He is too busy crying!
Storagemanager wrote:
Pony tails are timeless! As are flannel shirts! Don’t be fooled by the bald head, goatee wearing peoples. They are a mere flash in the pan!
bluliner10 wrote:
That must be why ponies wear them.
@ bluliner10:
Hey Charles is bringing back the early to mid 90′s look!
RIX wrote:
Rightly so.
@ Rodan:
Indeed, plus the whole “Mormon” thing was hard for some (don’t know why, I know a lot of Mormons and can’t find anything to dislike in any of them). Where he really lost was with young, unmarried women, who are apparently easily duped into believing the stupidest crap imaginable.
(You single guys should find out where they hang out on Saturday nights -- I’m thinking they’ll believe you if you tell them they look just like Gwyneth Paltrow).
@ bluliner10:
There are 60-year-old ponytailed, flannel-wearing surfers hanging around The Wedge that would be embarrassed by this guy.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Rodan wrote:
While John Boehner Gently Weeps.
@ Carolina Girl:
Santorum really did damage here. He gave the Dems ammo to use against republicans. Akins and Mourdock didn’t help.
“Little Green Lunch Room Lady”
LGLRL
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Great song parody!
THANK YOU FOR THIS THREAD.
Busy today, can’t stop/talk but this is something I’lve been howling about for awhile, so thank you.
Just a reminder -- thanks to Glenn Reynolds -- I completely forgot that 75 watt lightbulbs are banned as of Jan 1 -- so stock up.
If anyone here lives in Michigan’s 6th -- Fred Upton is your congress person who promised to get rid of this nonsense and he’s done exactly squat. Pick up the fucking phone.
taxfreekiller wrote:
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are killing me!
Carolina Girl wrote:
Look at who they go out with, and how many of them believe they can change the guy they’re dating, that he “doesn’t mean it” when he slaps them around, etc., etc.
@ Rodan:
This was going to be the game plan for Obama’s re-election no matter what -- as I said yesterday -- that left-field birth control question to Romney by Stephanopolous. Then he says he “made a bet” with Diane Sawyer about asking the question when he was asked about it the next day. He couldn’t very well admit that the White House had told him to plant it.
If you do not agree with the LGLRL you get buggers in your oat meal, then deleted for all time.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Well, then it just reminds me of a poet…Duvall who said…”Charlie don’t surf!”.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
My ex-husband hit me -- ONCE. His ass then made friends with my cast-iron roux pan.
Is Mitt about to get revenge on the American people or does he just like kissing ass?
Carolina Girl wrote:
The worse was Santorum jumped on that question and said he was OK with banning contraceptives. He went on about it for days. It was the WH plan because they knew that dork Santorum could not help himself.
“You there,, Iron Fist” back to the end of the line, do 100 push ups then get in line at the rear and then you must agree with my LGLRL crap or you get no lunch and all your post are mine.”
MacDuff wrote:
Affirmative Action is predicated on black inferiority, yet blacks vigorously defend it and consider it “racist” to want to get rid of it!
McCain will pay for the food, Susan Collins will be the food server and Boner will cry and pray that King Obama will like them all now that they have learned to bow just like Obama does.@ Storagemanager:
@ taxfreekiller:
She’s a very important person now!
The bill to rescind the light bulb ban -- didn’t pass -- but it came out of the energy and commerce committee. Should have mentioned that.
energy and commerce
sorry to be a pain.
as for Santorum -- I have spoken of him at length here. Whenever Hubby had to go to the Hill to meet with him, stomach cramps ensued. He treated people with contempt and disdain. Hubby wanted to punch his lights out.
ok, I gotta go. Again, thanks for this thread.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Chrome won’t get you home, but it will get you laid!
@ Storagemanager:
He said he will stand with the Muslims. He did not lie!
@ Rodan:
I’m sure @ Storagemanager:
This inept administration has us hurtling forward in the WWIII Express Lane.
In other news at Zip, via the AP:
Time for Israel to light the fires and kick the tires…..
I hate this petty shit…another town, another cross gets canned
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/kansas-town-forced-to-remove-cross.html
Rodan wrote:
He is one…..I know it in my heart.
@ heysoos:
Makes me sick. They tried to remove the cross at Mt. Davidson in San Francisco and lost. They did, however, remove the cross from the logo for Los Angeles (I guess the irony of removing a religious symbol for a the “City of Angels” is lost on them).
Carolina Girl wrote:
Ayatollah Khomeini… “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world”
@ Storagemanager:
The fact that the filmmaker of the Islam video is being locked up over the silliest of pretenses tells me that he lusts after the power of the Islamofacist dictators in the ME and wishes he were one. Egypt, in a Cairo court, has issued a “death sentence” by the way, against all those involved in the video and they were tried in absentia. I will wait patiently for the outrage by this administration.
@ Storagemanager:
The Ayatollahs hate the Persian people. They want to destroy Iran, knowing it will be the Arab Caliphate that benefits.
Storagemanager wrote:
Obama take note.
Rodan wrote:
No…they really believe the Hidden Imam is on earth and Islam will rule the world.
@ Carolina Girl:
Obama wantsIran to get nuclear weapons. He can't just give them to them, but he is doing everything in his power to keep Israel from interfering with their acquisition. And once Iran gets nukes, they will use them.Bare minimum, they grab Saudi Arabia and Mecca for themselves. Anschluss with Iraq is also likely. We have the bestest foreign policy in the world!
Storagemanager wrote:
I think we need to let his land go up in smoke, rather we should help it.
Rodan wrote:
He bows to them, too.
We may believe the hidden Imam is nonsense….they do NOT!
bluliner10 wrote:
Got President?
Carolina Girl wrote:
a number of years ago the ACLU came after Las Cruces, New Mexico for the same reason, the city logo…they told the ACLU to bring it on or fuck off…there was no more about it..why can’t people mind their own damned business?….these friggin militant atheists bore me to death
Iron Fist wrote:
I’ve been saying this from the beginning, but there are still people who don’t believe it.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Ewwwww. But you are most probably correct.
Merry Christmas
Rodan wrote:
The Republican Party dragged Romney down.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Looking for a leisure suit.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I believe it.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
and I like to point out how many times he’s said he will not allow it…he just blurts out all sorts of crazy shit
Carolina Girl wrote:
You can thanks assholes such as Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock for that.
@ heysoos:
I hear ya -- I live in the land of Michael Newd
dowdolt, the Ninth Circuit and the Pledge of Allegiance.Rodan wrote:
Until we get intelligent, focused, and disciplined candidates who know how to handle “gotcha” questions on rape/incest/abortion -- we will never take back the Senate.
@ Speranza:
I look at him and visualize the line in “To Kill a Mockingbird” -- an overnight soaking had deprived him of protective layers of dirt.”
Rodan wrote:
Charles Johnson -- lunch room attendant -- now I can picture that!
@ Iron Fist:
Pakistan will defend the Sunni States. The most probably Nuke exchange will be Iran and Pakistan.
@ Storagemanager:
From the land that gave birth to Quisling.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Is it asking too much for the Stupid Party to insist on real journalists such as Bret Baier, Chris Wallace or Brit Hume moderate these “debates”?
heysoos wrote:
He has done nothing whatever to prevent Iran’s nuclear program: sanctions are a swiss-cheese joke. He has repeatedly refused to draw a “red line,” as Netanyahu has asked him to; he has certainly not attempted to coordinate a military response with or without Israel, or to issue any form of ultimatum. All he does is posture and blather.
More telling, he sat silent with his thumbs up his ass during Iran’s “green revolution” which was a precursor to the “Arab Spring,” which he favors. Why did he do this? Because he did not want to offend the mullahs.
It has been clear from the beginning that Obama has wanted to use the threat of Iranian nukes to force Israel to grant the “Palestinians” everything and more they have on their wish list; “only I can save you from them, but I will only do so if…” That the Iranians could not be trusted to keep such a bargain is immaterial—indeed, when they break such an agreement after he leaves office, as they surely will, he will gladly shed crocodile tears for Israel’s demise.
@ Speranza:
Akin won his nomination via a push by Democrats to get him nominated and a “split” conservative vote. When he became a liability, he should immediately have put his own ambitions aside for the good of the country. But I don’t kid myself that these guys are in it for the altruism. Rubio and West, yes — Akin and Christie -- no.
As for Mourdock -- no excuse of this, especially after Akin made that stupid rape remark. Learn the value of being the “strong, silent type.
@ Speranza:
I think its 2018 at the earliest we take back the Senate.
Carolina Girl wrote:
You should have introduced his gonads to your knee.
@ Carolina Girl:
Akins thinks he was on a mission from God. Hence his political suffering will lead to a heavenly reward.
Rodan wrote:
I hate that mother ****** Rick Santorum. I am glad he lost in 2006.
Rodan wrote:
One of the Blue-State Brothers?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I will do you one further. I think Obama wants Israel and Iran to nuke each other so the Sunni Arab Muslim Brotherhood Caliphate dominates the Mideast. With Israel and Iran out of the way, there will be nothing stopping the Caliphate.
@ heysoos:
Oh, and don’t forget that his Communist Svengali, Valerie Jarrett, is Iranian-born.
@ Speranza:
What’s the definition of “insanity” again? Repeating the same behavior hoping for a different result. Every debate season the GOP agrees to these twits moderating debates and every debate season they get burned. But every time they thing this’ll be the year the media likes them.
@ Speranza:
I wish someone would knock that stupid smirk off his face. It is crazy that many people love this guy. He’s a Socialist!
Carolina Girl wrote:
They don’t get it. The GOP elites live in a bubble. Losers like Karl Rove are taken seriously.
Rodan wrote:
Interesting; a Little Black Sambo foreign policy. He sits in the tree while the “tigers” race around it until they turn into radioactive dust.
Carolina Girl wrote:
I agree on both your points. I also blame Mike Shmuckabee for not telling Akin to take one for the team and withdraw. Mourdock has got to be the spawn of a marriage between first cousins since he walked right into the trap.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Here’s the sinister reason. Obama views Jews and Persians as Whites. He views Arabs as his Black brothers. Have the 2 white nations in the Mideast destroy each other so his Black Arab Brothers take over.
I could be wrong, but that is my theory.
@ Rodan:
One of the points Andrew McCarthy makes in his book “The Great Jihad” is that the bow by Obama to the Saudi King was no “mistake” -- this king controls the holy cities of Mecca and Medina and is a high and mighty person to Muslims worthy of deference and respect.
I think he has a pro-Islam agenda -- I mean, really, look at the ridiculous statements he makes about the Muslim contributions over American history (yeah -- always involving the deaths of civilians, and the infringement of Christian’s constitutional rights in Dearborn) and NASA’s “Muslim outreach mission”.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Rodan wrote:
There is a good reason why they are referred to as “The Stupid Party”.
@ Rodan:
That wouldn’t really hurt my feelings. I am mostly worried about nuclear terrorism, though. Either against us or against Israel or both. They can build a bomb that’ll fit in a shipping container right now. They’ve probably got the requisite materials for it. The only reason to suspect that they don’t have nuclear weapons is that they haven’t used them.
@ Speranza:
I call him Huck A Buck.
@ Speranza:
If someone were to publicly knock out Santorum on TV, I would set up a legal fund.
Carolina Girl wrote:
He really is an Islamophile. I belvieve he is an atheist at heart but has a real soft spot for “Third World” Muslims.
Storagemanager wrote:
Rodan wrote:
Don’t physically hurt him, just slap and humiliate him
Iron Fist wrote:
Iran getting a bomb will lead to The Sunnis getting a bomb. You best bet Al-Qaeda will get a Bomb from the Sunnis and Hizballah from Iran. An Iranian Nuke will set of a chain reaction.
@ Carolina Girl:
I think Obama wants rid of the KING and the Muslim brother form the CALIPHATE.
@ Speranza:
Just get that smirk off his face. I think Santorum is a paid agent of George Soros. How does he make a living? No one ever investigates this.
Rodan wrote:
Interesting. Hadn’t occurred to me, but possible.
By the way, appropos of nothing, I really wish the credit rating agencies would announce what the effect raising the debt ceiling would have on the United States credit rating before the vote on raising the ceiling. Instead, when they lower it after the vote, it will attributed to the debate over the raising, rather than the result.
Of course, didn’t Obama’s DOJ threaten them with investigation when they lowered the rating last time. The criminal enterprise thinks it can intimidate and threaten at will.
@ Storagemanager:
I remember how his radio show was going to be a serious threat to Rush Limbaugh. Rush’s audience is just fine and everyone I know hates Huckabee’s show.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Your theory and mine do not contradict each other. One does not rule out the other.
Rodan wrote:
Iran will use the bomb….listen to the words…we need chaos in order for the Mahdi to rule….they tell us the plan….WE refuse to listen.
@ Carolina Girl:
Huckabee has a show? It has to be about as popular as Randi Rhodes was, because I’ve never heard of it.
@ Storagemanager:
Yup, they think a huke war will bring in the Mahdi.
@ Speranza:
Obama knows no other god before himself, but he does indeed have a soft spot for the Mohammedans. It is clear from his every action.
The Two Party Evil Money Cult In Washington D.C. All Members Of The Low Bow Institute Of Cowards.
@ Iron Fist:
@ Carolina Girl:
@ Speranza:
I woukld love to set up a 4 person politician cage match.
Bout 1: Huckabee vs. Santorum
Bout 2: Jeb “Porky” Bush vs. Chris “the fake Guido” Christie
Then the winner of those 2 face of in a final match. The winner takes on Hillary “Super Thighs” Clinton.
Iron Fist wrote:
He loves Islam.
Some one needs to put together a flow chart of the lies on Bengazie.
Should be a dozie.
taxfreekiller wrote:
I think George P Bush wants to get his feet wet in politics so in 2018 he challenges Ted Cruz for his senate seat.
Obama is the result of a gene pool of lies.
Iran stated they could force the return of Mahdi…in order for the return there must be chaos on Earth…Shia prophecy states Baghdad and Syria will both be destroyed before the return of the Mahdi….we have western minds….we do not think like they do or we would understand they are telling us the truth.,…they want war and destruction..
@ Iron Fist:
Cumulus Broadcasting launched him back in April on their stations when the contracts with Rush ran out. In San Francisco, KSFO took Rush off and put on Huckabee and Rush went to a lesser station -- and he STILL beats him by 143% in the 9-12 slot. Plus we can get Rush live on 580, a 50,000 watt station from Fresno.
@ Rodan:
Do not think the kid can even get elected as Land Comm. that he is after now.
But ya never know until the money flows.
taxfreekiller wrote:
I hope you guys work to defeat him!
Keeping on topic, over at LGF!
SHOCKED….( not )
My take on the whole budget debate.
Give Obama and the dems everything they want. Don’t vote for it, just don’t stop it. The one thing we get is a public statement from the President, Dem Senators and Democrap reps stating the following:
“Any consequences resulting from our actions is the sole responsibility of the President and the Democrat Party”
Make the bastards own it, lock, stock and barrel! They are going to get it anyway from what I’m seeing, but as it stands now the republicans will carry much of the blame when the shit hits the fan!
Rodan wrote:
Obdicunt is an inbred moron.
Rodan wrote:
I hope that every Bush gets crushed.
Iron Fist wrote:
He identifies them as being the oppressed when they are in actuality the oppressors.
@ Speranza:
Same here!
Rodan wrote:
Chris Christie would be the Haystacks Calhoun of that match.
@ Speranza:
Islam is the world’s most successful totalitarian movement.
@ Speranza:
Remind me again how the GOP is homophobic:
It seems to me every time gays are belittled or a politician is “accused” of gay activity, the finger pointing and jokes are done by those “oh so tolerant” libturds.
I’m such the Race/Homophobe Detective pictured above will be all over this today.
Rodan wrote:
I want to see them humiliated and discredited.
New thread.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Andrea Mitchell -- that buffoon needs to go on early retirement.
Speranza wrote:
Obviously, you’ve seen the New York City Parks Department at work.
@ Speranza:
Check out the comment I referenced in the next thread!
@ Speranza:
If we’re doing cage matches, I’ll take on Andrea Mitchell -- battle of the blousy blondes!
Carolina Girl wrote:
I want to sell tickets to the Chris Christie-Michael Moore sumo bout!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
And that may be the problem. At the very least
it is for her boss.
Iron Fist wrote:
She’s no darker than most of us!
Oh, and btw, people STILL hate Serbs -- at least, those who have Muslim contacts or who are old enough to remember the 1990s.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I would pay money NOT to have to watch that.