This man is evil, and there is no credible way to defend him.
Before you watch the video, here is the Webster definition of the word Demagogue:
A political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
The above link will take you to Gateway Pundit, where I also found the above youtube clip. It was evil enough that the Sandy Hook Tragedy was used as a political football, once again bringing out the same shrill voices who wish to disabuse us of our Second Amendment Rights, but this is something far worse and far more insidious. While the anti-gun lobby have no shame in setting up straw men, using deflection from pertinent issues in order to sway public opinion, torture non-sequiturs to the point of ridiculous, have perfected ad hominems, and have no qualms with appearing at every tragic event and shamelessly pimping out crocodile tears in an effort to make ordinary people believe that they really care one wit about their anguish, they are at least sincere in their belief that they know what’s best for others and should be the defacto group put in charge of all others due to being better suited to control the lives of those of us less qualified to be breathing. What the President did in his speechifying today during the daily press briefing was far worse, and in fact the single greatest act of pure evil ever perpetrated by an American President.
Barack Obama has openly attempted to prey on American fear in order to push his agenda, and not just the straw man related agenda of gun control, but is attempting to use our national sorrow as a justification for supporting our own economic collapse. This is the Administration that verbalized in February of 2009 that a good crisis should never be allowed to go to waste. It should surprise no one now that they are milking our current anguish for all it is worth.
I keep waiting for the inevitable fall that every charismatic cult leader suffers when people who blindly follow him to their self destruction so slickly disguised as salvation to start. By the way, make no mistake about that, it will one day start, as it has with every such example history has provided thus far. When people realize that he is not interested in delivering their salvation, but only in enhancing his own power at the expense of, well everything and anything that stands in his way to that power, those that followed blindly will be the most angered by the betrayal. History is replete with these types of demagogues, and Barack Obama is no more remarkable, nor any smarter than any of those. He simply is a silver tongued devil, who’s competency begins and ends with his ability to read pre-written words off of a teleprompter.
My faith in my fellow American is this, eventually, we will rid ourselves of this malignancy, we will survive it, and we will do the right thing. As Winston Churchill once quipped, “Americans will eventually do the right thing once they have exhausted all other options.” 10 Million fewer people voted for Barack Obama in 2012 than did in 2008, and my belief is that through each one of these types of incidents, more and more people will realize the truth of this man, who is after all, the least competent man in any room that he enters.
Through two Presidential campaigns, and 4 years in office, Barack Obama has yet to make any kind of political argument for anything that he has done, or plans to do. It sickens me to watch the GOP leadership, capitulate to this evil in so obvious a manner. They too will pay the price for their part in what happens next. Those who fail to stand up to evil bear some responsibility for its fruits, and the upcoming frightful consequence will be no exception to that rule.
Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.
Flyovercountry I keep waiting for that fall too.
When people realize that he is not interested in delivering their salvation,
I don’t think many of them care. Obama got the low info voters. By definition they don’t pay attention. I doubt they’ll be starting any time soon. When they watch the financial collapse, it won’t be Obama they blame. It will be the ‘unfairly’ rewarded ‘rich’.
eaglesoars wrote:
Yep.
BTW, in case you missed it: “My Favorite Things.”
eaglesoars wrote:
Indeed! Whoever gets the blame will not be the one responsible for it for sure. With this past re-election it showed quite clearly obama doesn’t have to answer for anything. Which in and of itself is a tragedy.
It really is going to be a very long 4 years……..
all over the net their is somewhere you can sign to ban assualt weapons. Crazy week.
.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/12/20/holder-says-obama-will-use-his-dictator-like-executive-actions-to-enact-gun-control-policy/
Lily wrote:
Apparently neither does Hillary -- which pisses me off no end.
How are you feeling today?
@ eaglesoars:
It ticks me off too.
I’m feeling all right considering that I was cracked open like a walnut. LOL! I go today for a check-up. Today it’s been two weeks since they did the triple by-pass. As long as they don’t touch me today I think I’ll do fine. LOL!
/yousers I’m very sore and still hurt a little bit.
@ Lily:
That could start a civil war. The people who are buying guns in record numbers today aren’t buying them to just hand them over when the god-king decrees that they do.
Lily wrote:
I can believe it!
Rush is reporting that Scott Brown -- who incredibly lost to Elizabeth Warren -- is writing gun control legislation. How the Stupid Party loses………..
@ Iron Fist:
Indeed that could cause some problems. With obama you never know what in the hell he is going to do. If he does do this…it isn’t going to be good at all.
@ eaglesoars:
Gun Controll laws? Boy they certainly didn’t waste anytime nor did they even wait for the dust to settle on this.
@ eaglesoars:
See why I say RINOs aren’t worth the trouble? All they do is make “bipartisan” partisan issues. You never see conservative Democrats swing the other way. You don’t see Joe Manchin crafting legislation to block gun control, do you? Maybe he won’t vote for it (his job is pretty much on the line), but he won;t do anything substantive to impede it.
Lily wrote:
Back to SCOTUS. I can imagine that some states’ attorneys general will start a 10th amendment fight. Texas. Virginia.
What exactly does Holder think Obama can do? Physically disarm this house?
pfft. Don’t think so.
@ Iron Fist:
You have a point.
Iron Fist wrote:
And the guy is from West Virginia fer cryin’ out loud! That’s not exactly a ‘gun free zone’ last time I checked.
A caller on Rush is saying we have to figure out who the Dems are going to run in 2016 and start destroying him NOW. Rush sez ‘yep, look what the Dems are already doing to Rubio’
A very slow day today.
@ Lily:
akon needs some spelling lessons (where do you FIND this stuff?)
@ Lily:
I’m here, Lily, I just went to get lunch.
.
I want to believe that, but this is a change in the voters.
It will take a lot of time to undo this.
Time to give Molly more meds. Another 10 minute fight……..
brb
@ eaglesoars:
Even worse when you consider that his big commercial airing in West Virginia was him taking his high powered rifle and using it to shoot something that was supposed to be the Cap and Trade Bill being considered at the time. He clearly ran on a pro Second Amendment promise. I hope West Virginia holds him accountable.
@ Flyovercountry:
Oh jeez, I’d forgotten about that!
What wonderful and nice people they are:
@ Guggi:
Barbarians being barbaric. Ino order to have civilization, the civilized have to be willing to do what it takes to silence the barbarians. In Pakistan (and worse in Afghanistan) the barbarians are winning.
@ Iron Fist:
They prefer to let their children die because of
Can we now blame O. for the death of these people ?
eaglesoars wrote:
All the chicken innards and astrology charts point to Deval Patrick.
No one in the R party has the balls to go after him.
Iron Fist wrote:
Mars wrote:
Another ‘get back, he’s BLACK’ dynamic…..
@ eaglesoars:
That’s going to get old pretty quick. I think political correctness has already passed its half-life. People are going ot get fed up with it, especially when you have black racists like Jamie Foxx spouting off their hate whitey script. Either racism is vile and reprehensible, or it isn’t. Given the race-monger’s reactions to the likes of Foxx and all, I’m figuring that they don’t really have a problem with racism per se, only with certain races.
Iron Fist wrote:
Tim Scott is a ‘token’.
From a Univ Penn poli sci prof.
He should be denied his tenure and fired.
@ eaglesoars:
Yes, just like the blatantly racist editorial cartoons that were ran about Condi Rice (some sexism there, too. I don’t recall similar things bout Colin Powell). Racism is only bad if it is the wrong racism. Otherwise it is perfectly acceptible behavior. Look at all the blatant anti-Semitism from the anti-Israel camp. They’d have to be wearing swastika armbands to get any more anti-Semitic, yet they are tenured professors and “respected” community “leaders”. I include our current President in that camp.
Iron Fist wrote:
I was looking at stuff differently the last few days and came to the conclusion that the Foxx stuff was planned.
After he said it they waited a couple days to see how much outrage occurred and then they proceeded to reward him.
It was announced that he was up for several awards, and then announced that he will be playing a primary villain in the next spiderman movie.
They planned it, he followed through, and now he’s being rewarded for his servitude.
The election emboldened these scumbags and now they are just testing the waters to see how much they can get away with without any backlash.
Speaking of racism, is it my imagination or is Quentin Tarantino truly the despicable violence-porn huckster, and now racism pimp, that I think he is?
Don’t know what Mike C. has to say to this but:
One of the great surprises to almost everyone in this early part of the 21st Century is the explosion of American energy production. It is almost as shocking as the fall of the Berlin Wall, if not quite as iconic.
and again:
@ Iron Fist:
The election is over so now he does the National Party’s bidding.
@ 35 buzzsawmonkey: He has smoked too much liberal crack and is chafing that it’s illegal. He thinks it advantageous to sell an idea of destruction of tradition. So he can smoke crack legally.
@ Mars:
‘Of course it is. It was to generate controversy (ticket sales) and get Conservatives worked up. Now he is reaping the reward of his actions.
He’s an actor and does what he is told.
@ Mars:
Yeah, they are all getting off on the “super-minority” shit, but sooner or later the majority is going to get tired of being demonized. They are going to remember that there are more of them than there are of the minorities, so why, again, should they put up with it?
@ 25 Guggi: illiteracy. I haven’t kept up with the cultures but I think there is a conspiracy theory abroad that rumor that vaccinations have nefarious purposes. It means instead of throwing a doctor into a remote area, some diplomacy and buy in needs to occur first.
Guggi wrote:
Watch Obama kill it. There’s no way he wants the U.S. to be successful at anything except groveling.
@ Iron Fist:
Racism towards certain groups in America is acceptable. It’s the way elites divide people and rule over serfs.
Mars wrote:
Well, it was bad timing -- so close to Newton.
@ Rodan:
Yep. Democrats are Democrats first, and any principles that they might entertain having are definately secondaryto party loyalty. Republicans are different in that. We kowtow to the RINOs, and then act surprised when they stab us in the back. What did Arlen Specter ever do for the Party that he was rewarded with chairmanship of the Judiciary Comittee for? He voted with the Democrats as often as not before he jumped ship to provide a filibuster-proof senate to get ObamaCare through. His priorities were always that of the Democrat Party. When he could best serve the Democrats as a “Republican” he was a Republican, but when it was more advantageous for him to show his true colors he didn’t hesitate.
Rodan wrote:
I don’t even think that was it. They rushed around deleting all the copies they could find off of youtube as fast as possible.
I think it was a test of the media control. They wanted to make sure they could get away with whatever they want before moving to whatever their next phase is.
darkwords wrote:
This fits for Sudan and some other parts of Africa not for Pakistan. In Pakistan Islamists like al Qaeda and the Taliban are behind this.
@ Iron Fist:
David Frum, Joe Scarborough, Colin Powell and David Brooks come to mind.
eaglesoars wrote:
On the other side he would be seen as economic genius who boosted welfare and helped the economy.
It is my understanding, as regards the vaccination killings, that the guy who dug up bin Laden for the SEALS (and is now languishing in a Pakistani prison for doing so) was gathering intelligence under the cover of a traveling vaccine program.
If that is the case, it is understandable why PakiTaliban™ would be killing vaccination teams.
@ Mars:
Yup, Jamie Foxx is an actor, he does what he is told.
eaglesoars wrote:
Yeah but Newtown was unpredictable.
Doesn’t matter Foxx has been rewarded for service to his masters.
Has anyone ever though if this whole Democrat vs. Republican is a dog and pony show to divide Americans? I have been wondering sometimes if politics is just show put on so global elites can manipulate people and achieve power.
Rodan wrote:
Exactly. And the timing of all of these roles and gifts he’s being offered was just a blatant payoff.
@ Mars:
He did his job!
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I had the pleasure of calling Quentin Tarantino a jackass backstage at a Tragically Hip concert in Austin, TX. I had not yet seen pulp fiction and had no idea of who he was. He was an inglorious jackoff who nearly was pummeled to pulp by a pleasantly numb Marine…I think the feeling ended up mutual. Not that I care, I don’t think I am planning to audition for him anytime soon.
heh
@ Mars:
It’s not a coincidence.
Rodan wrote:
You’re starting to sound like the IWW.
@ bluliner10:
He did True Romance, but wasn’t that well known yet.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Yeah, I recall that too. The cover for the Doctor was vax.
When is the next time that a local will cooperate after this
guy was tossed off of the sled?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Yup, what nice people they are. They let their children rather become polio to punish the “Americans”. Cowards.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
What’s that?
@ eaglesoars:
Job creation!
Rodan wrote:
The Industrial Workers of the World—the “wobblies” or “I Won’t Works.” Joe Hill’s outfit. The anarcho-syndicalists who stood for the One Big Union, which would follow after the General Strike when the workers of the world refused to work for the bosses any more.
@ eaglesoars:
The only jobs Obama has created that aren’t for the Government. But, of course, Obama is working to put those people out of work by outlawing the product that they sell. Obama won’t be satisfied until everyone who doesn’t work for the government is on unemployment.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Er, “International Workers of the World”.
Mike C. wrote:
Not unless they’ve changed their name in the last 30 years.
VDH on the new racism.
@ Mike C.:
Crap -- I’m wrong again…
This is getting to be a bad habit…
@ Mike C.:
@ buzzsawmonkey:
…and a very quick Google check indicates they haven’t.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
That’s anti-Capitalist. Mine is coming from a Pro-Capitalist/Nationalist/Anti-Islamic angle. So their conclusions are wrong. But there are too many things not adding up.
Check out the conversation between Aussie Infidel and I. He’s very well connected in New Zealand. He agrees something is not right.
I would like to say what I think is going on, but people would dismiss it. So I stick to the conventional political viewpoint.
@ Mike C.:
That is a different Communist front group. They all sound the same because they all are the same. It is just totalitarianism dressed up in drag. Just like Obama and the Democrats.
Iron Fist wrote:
That is the end game of the elites. Pit Americans of different ethnic groups against each other.
I am starting to become convinced that the elites of both parties want to end America and place us under some Global Government. What better way than to divide us by ethnicity and race. Once again, VDH nails it!
@ Rodan:
I did a 3 year tour of recruiting 94-97 in Austin, TX. During that time I had the pleasure of meeting the crew of one morning show KLBJ-FM. Dale Dudley and Bob Fonseca they had a lady named Debra too, I cannot think of her last name. Dale and I were politically polar opposites, Bob was the son of retired AF Chief Master Sergeant and had a pretty good rapport. But they allowed me on the air, and I became the military advisor when Howard Stern attempted to syndicate to an opposing channel. This is a real live ‘no shit there I was’ story. That association was awesome as potential recruits knew who I was “Sgt Steve the Dudley, Bob and Debra Military Advisor”. And I got some cool bennies too. Backstage to the Black Crowes and the Tragically Hip, free passes to South by Southwest, and when the Austin Ice Bats arrived, I helped on the original commercial and got Marine Corps advertising on the boards of the fledgeling Western Professional Hockey League rinks. And I met a lot of hot women.
One last piece on QT, Dale, Bob and Debra did a menagerie of their “greatest hits” pranks, comic bits and studio guests. On the CD liner, I was listed…right above Quentin Tarantino. The cover of the CD was Dale dressed in drag copying the Pulp Fiction movie poster. To Quentin Tarantino…Semper F U.
Rodan wrote:
There is one party controlling everything. The elite party. The difference is that one half is controlled by die hard socialists that want a one world communist utopia, and the other half are power hungry jackasses who will do anything to remain in Washington and go to all the right parties.
@ Rodan:
I think the Democrats want to bring an end to America, and think that they can ride the storm to take over whatever comes out of that. I disagree about the Republicans, though. There are stark differences between the parties. We’re going to see that as the drive for gun control progresses over the next couple of months. You can’t really blame the Republicans for the results of the election. Frankly, I don’t think going more for the low information voters would have made any difference. The low-info voters want the easy answer, and they are allergic to anything resembling personal responsibility. There’s no way that Romney could have won their votes without promising them the “cool, hip” responsibility-free lifestyle in their parent’s basement that Obama promised them.
Rodan wrote:
Not all of us, Sparky. I followed that conversation between you and Aussie last nite. You two were so circumspect that it wasn’t terribly obvious to me what’s going on, but I know damn well SOMETHING is.
Agenda 21?
Gotta run an errand. Back in a bit.
@ bluliner10:
That was around the time I was Djing Rap in NYC. So I do know what environment you were dealing with. That’s cool you had a radio gig for a bit. ALot of primadonnas in that scene if you know what I mean.
My favorite scene from True Romance was the Dennis Hooper and Chris Walken scene about Sicilians!
Alot of people who became big were in that movie.
@ Iron Fist:
This is where we disagree. Many of those people you dismiss did not vote for free stuff. They voted for Obama because he outreached to them and told them Republicans hate them. Because Republicans did not go for these voters, they believed them.
I know you say Republicans are not bad, but ask yourself this. Why do Republicans support military action for the Muslim Brotherhood? If they are better than Dems, why do their foreign policy Pro-Islamic as much as the Dems.
At the local level, yes the GOP is light years ahead of the Democrats. But at a national level, I am starting to become convinced the GOP does not exist. It’s the straw man of the Democrats.
Speaking of the crisis at hand, Harry Reid has already said that the Senate isn’t going to do anything about the Fiscal Cliff:
I’ve been saying for some time that the Democrats want to go over the Fiscal Cliff. They get tax increases and get to gut the military without having to take a vote on it. What could be better for them? Boehner was an idiot for not simply refusing to raise the Debt Ceiling without substantive cuts, and I mean taking spending back to around 1996 levels. Instead, Obama is going to spend upwards of two trillion mor ethan we take in this year, and he is going to gut the military and raise taxes. And the Republicans will probably allow the Democrats to get away with this.
@ Iron Fist:
The media will blame Republicans. The Democrats will not get any damage.
New Thread.
Rodan wrote:
Oh yeah, the media is already put the frame in place. Republican “obstructionism”. Totally disregarding that Boehner just offered them everything they asked for last time.
@ Rodan:
Even on the pro-Islamist stuff you are mistaken. You take the blatherings of John McCain and Lindsey Graham as being indicitive of wht the Republicans as a whole think. I do not believe that this is the truth. Take the Libyan fiasco for example. If Obama had thought he could get his military adventurism through both the House and Senate, he would have brought it to a vote. He didn’t have the votes, and probably some Democrats would have even voted against him. Certainly most Republicans in the House would have voted against him, and he didn’t want to lose the vote. If the Republicans were really just a straw man for the the Democrats, Obama woudl have gotten approval for his actions. It would have shielded him some when it inevitibly blew up, as it did in Benghazi. Now, I agree that the Republican leadership is more interested in getting invited to tony Washington parties than they are winning or principles, but that is corruption, not simply being owned by the Democrats.
@ Mars:
Yup.
@ Iron Fist:
I am going to do a thread on this subject. Should make for an interesting conversation.
Rodan wrote:
I think you and Aussie are a little off base.
The problem is that there are three groups in politics, in the guise of two:
1) The far left—which, whether or not it is still organized under a central committee somewhere, is ideologically unified enough to know what it wants to do and where it wants to go. They run the Democrats here now;
2) The Perk Party, half of which is with the Democrats and half of which is with the Republicans. The members of the Perk Party don’t give a shit what happens to anyone, as long as they get theirs;
3) The conservatives. These are a mixed bunch, some being more social-conservative, some less so—and “social conservative” can mean a number of different things. This means that the conservatives are the most divided, the least unified, both temperamentally and by reason of their holding to different strains of conservatism. Plus, because they see human beings as individual actors, they tend not to see people as the cogs in a movement which the far-left ideologues are. They don’t understand the nature of the enemy and are temperamentally ill-suited to dealing with an enemy of that kind, anyway.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Exactly as I see it. The Right isn’t unified because we are a collection of individuals, not merely part of the collective. So when Rodan and I disagree on social policy, neither of us has the right or authority to demand the other “get with the program”. On the Left there is an over-riding uniformity of thought and process. You don’t have pro-life or pro-gun Democrats anymore, whereas you have pro-abortion and pro-gun contrl Republicans (though these are more in the Perks Party than they are Republicans).
Iron Fist wrote:
It isn’t that the left doesn’t have pro-life or pro-gun dems, they do, but they are often marginalized.
What the left has instead of individuals, is special interest groups. On the right we all have our own ideas and contributions. On the left they all sublimate their own beliefs in order to fit with whatever special interest group fits their one big issue.
Mars wrote:
Name one pro-life Democrat at the national level. Bart Stupak was the last, and when the rubber met the road he cast the sdeciding vote in favor of ObamaCare and its abortion mandate in spite of being “pro-life”. He used being “pro-life” to sucker the voters in his state until he really needed to show his true colors, but when the time came he was no more pro-life than Nancy Pelosie. The same is no doubt true of the so-called “pro-gun” Democrats. They’ll be showing their true colors over the next few weeks, I expect, unless Obama decides to drop such a politically charged hot-potato. He may. The last time the Democrats forced gun control through the legislature they controlled both houses of COngress, and they promptly lost control of both houses of congress. We’ll se if they remember that lesson.
Rodan wrote:
that’s exactly what it is
Iron Fist wrote:
Bob Casey but I don’t think he’s around anymore.
Am I the only person whose teeth grate when Obama uses the word “folks”? I can’t imagine he actually speaks like that in private.