It amuses me how many politicians in both the Republican and Democrat parties claim they are against terrorism. Yet, both parties are looking for an excuse to attack Syria in support of the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda. In the Libyan War the national Republican Party led by John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum gave cover for Obama’s illegal war in Libya. Time and time again, the US under both parties has assisted Islamic terrorists.
The origins of the rise of Islamists is raced back to the Bosnian War. At that time the Bosnian Muslims leader and former Nazi collaborator Alija Izetbegovic who was also a member of the Muslim Brotherhood wanted to create an Islamic state. The Serb refused and began a resistance. Then Osama bin laden, Hassan Nasrallah, The Saudi and Iranians sent fighters to prop up the Islamic regime in Sarajevo. The International media demonized the Serbs, when in fact they were resisting Islamic rule. Israel to its credit sent weapons to Bosnian Serbs who were protecting Bosnian Jews and fighting Hizb’Allah.
“We don’t take sides in the conflict”, insists the Foreign Ministry spokesman, adding: “Because of anti-Semitic sentiments in (Croat president) Franjo Tudjmans’s book and the Hizballah-Iran help to the Muslims, you may draw the conclusion where our sympathies lie”.
In 1993 Bill Clinton with the backing of Democrats and Republicans in Congress, began a program to aid Islamic fighters in the Balkans. Even the Pro-Islamists Guardian admits the US/NATO was supporting the Jihadists.
The official Dutch inquiry into the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, released last week, contains one of the most sensational reports on western intelligence ever published. Officials have been staggered by its findings and the Dutch government has resigned. One of its many volumes is devoted to clandestine activities during the Bosnian war of the early 1990s. For five years, Professor Cees Wiebes of Amsterdam University has had unrestricted access to Dutch intelligence files and has stalked the corridors of secret service headquarters in western capitals, as well as in Bosnia, asking questions.
His findings are set out in “Intelligence and the war in Bosnia, 1992-1995″. It includes remarkable material on covert operations, signals interception, human agents and double-crossing by dozens of agencies in one of dirtiest wars of the new world disorder. Now we have the full story of the secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamist groups from the Middle East designed to assist the Bosnian Muslims – some of the same groups that the Pentagon is now fighting in “the war against terrorism”. Pentagon operations in Bosnia have delivered their own “blowback”.
In the 1980s Washington’s secret services had assisted Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran. Then, in 1990, the US fought him in the Gulf. In both Afghanistan and the Gulf, the Pentagon had incurred debts to Islamist groups and their Middle Eastern sponsors. By 1993 these groups, many supported by Iran and Saudi Arabia, were anxious to help Bosnian Muslims fighting in the former Yugoslavia and called in their debts with the Americans. Bill Clinton and the Pentagon were keen to be seen as creditworthy and repaid in the form of an Iran-Contra style operation – in flagrant violation of the UN security council arms embargo against all combatants in the former Yugoslavia.
The result was a vast secret conduit of weapons smuggling though Croatia. This was arranged by the clandestine agencies of the US, Turkey and Iran, together with a range of radical Islamist groups, including Afghan mojahedin and the pro-Iranian Hizbullah. Wiebes reveals that the British intelligence services obtained documents early on in the Bosnian war proving that Iran was making direct deliveries.
Iranian and Afghan veterans’ training camps had also been identified in Bosnia. Later, in the Dayton Accords of November 1995, the stipulation appeared that all foreign forces be withdrawn. This was a deliberate attempt to cleanse Bosnia of Iranian-run training camps. The CIA’s main opponents in Bosnia were now the mojahedin fighters and their Iranian trainers – whom the Pentagon had been helping to supply months earlier.
Meanwhile, the secret services of Ukraine, Greece and Israel were busy arming the Bosnian Serbs. Mossad was especially active and concluded a deal with the Bosnian Serbs at Pale involving a substantial supply of artillery shells and mortar bombs. In return they secured safe passage for the Jewish population out of the besieged town of Sarajevo. Subsequently, the remaining population was perplexed to find that unexploded mortar bombs landing in Sarajevo sometimes had Hebrew markings.
Here are 3 videos showing the Islamists in Bosnia and how the UN assisted them.
Next time you hear a Republican or Democrat claiming they are against Terror, keep in mind they are lying. As of this writing The Obama Regime and the national GOP are looking for a pretext to intervene in Syria. Once again America will back Jihadists. When will this madness stop? Why don’t more Conservatives speak out about this? Instead they blindly follow The GOP’s pro-Islamic foreign policy. I found it disturbing that while Democrats are split on getting involved and Independents oppose, a majority of Republicans support helping Islamic terrorists!
When it comes to the suggestion of Washington using military airplanes or missiles in the conflict, there appears to be a partisan divide and a gender gap, with Democrats divided, Republicans slightly in favor and independents opposed, and with men divided and women opposed.
This result is a disgrace and boggles my mind. Republicans should oppose intervention in Syria. This leads me to one conclusion, many Republicans are phonies about being opposed to Islamic terror. They just like nation building and support any war even if it’s not in our interests!
This nation’s foreign policy has been Pro-Islamic foe the last 20 years. I find this is a disgrace and the reason I can’t get worked up about Obama’s foreign policy. The Republicans are not offering an alternative and are addicted to nation building. We need a foreign policy based on national interests and opposition to Islamic aggression. Rand Paul is correct. How can we claim to support Israel, yet arm it’s enemies like Muslim Brotherhood Egypt and Hizb’Allah Lebanon (more on that later). Why don’t Conservatives speak against this madness, instead of supporting it?
Rodan Note: Treat this as an open thread if you choose.
Tags: Bosnian War