First time visitor? Learn more.

Twins separated at birth!

by Daedalus ( 60 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Blogwars, Diary of Daedalus, LGF at January 5th, 2013 - 5:00 pm

Chris Christie is a treacherous snake and his backstabbing of Mitt Romney will go down in political history.  Another backstabbing snake might be his twin separated at birth!

Two snakes separated by birth.

Bonus: Michael Moore and Charles Johnson have a resemblance as well!

(Hat Tip: Liz_Ardoid)

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

60 Responses to “Twins separated at birth!”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | January 5, 2013 5:03 pm

    [Facepalm]….


  2. coldwarrior
    2 | January 5, 2013 5:38 pm

    jeeze, cj…lay off the hfcs and the deep fried lard balls.


  3. The Osprey
    3 | January 5, 2013 5:49 pm

    Guido and Cheeto, in their milyo…


  4. coldwarrior
    4 | January 5, 2013 5:53 pm

    who has the milyo vid…I need to see it!


  5. Calo
    5 | January 5, 2013 5:58 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    That one?


  6. Calo
    6 | January 5, 2013 6:00 pm

    Here is another one


  7. coldwarrior
    7 | January 5, 2013 6:01 pm

    @ Calo:

    :lol:

    THANKS!!!!


  8. 8 | January 5, 2013 6:24 pm

    The Osprey wrote:

    Guido and Cheeto, in their milyo…

    That rhymes! LOL!


  9. coldwarrior
    9 | January 5, 2013 6:26 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    The Osprey wrote:
    Guido and Cheeto, in their milyo…

    That rhymes! LOL!

    poetry!


  10. coldwarrior
    10 | January 5, 2013 6:32 pm

    follow the money

    Only seven companies have offered corporate cash to help fund President Barack Obama’s upcoming inaugural festivities.

    In 2009, Obama banned corporate donors from paying for his inauguration, but he was still able to raise $53 million from private donors.

    However, this month’s inauguration is being held after the most expensive presidential campaign in history, and even with the corporate donations will be a scaled-down event. This year, fewer people are expected to attend the inauguration and there are only two official balls planned.

    There are a few reasons this year’s celebration has been scaled back.

    Organizers say the ceremonies reflect the nation is facing tough economic times, and fewer ceremonies will mean less of a burden on Washington’s law enforcement and residents, along with other security personnel.

    According to the Inauguration Committee’s website, more than 400 people have donated toward the events. So far, though, the only corporate donors are AT&T, Microsoft, Centene, Financial Innovations, Genentech, Stream Line Circle, and Whittier Trust Co.

    While some of the companies aren’t as well-known as AT&T and Microsoft, they’re still powerful in their own right. Genentech is a biotechnology company owned by Swiss drugmaker Roche, while Stream Line Circle is owned by billionaire Obama backer and gay-rights activist Jon Stryker, and Centene is a Medicaid administration company that is profiting highly through Obamacare, reports the Washington Post.

    Financial Innovations, meanwhile, earned $1.8 million in business through making promotional products used in Obama’s 2012 campaign, the Post reports.


  11. coldwarrior
    11 | January 5, 2013 6:36 pm

    bullshit:

    Idaho Republican Sen. Mike Crapo, who pleaded guilty Friday to drunken driving, says he’s swearing off alcohol and only began drinking last year to relieve on-the-job stress.

    The Mormon senator told reporters he was drinking once or twice a week, and always alone in his Washington D.C. apartment, reports the Idaho Statesman. He was pulled over early in the morning on Dec. 23, and he says that was the first time he ever drove after drinking. Crapo said he’d had “two to three” vodka tonics, and went for a drive because he couldn’t get to sleep.

    “I was drinking alone at my home and I got into my car alone,” he said. “I never got out of my car and I was not going to meet anybody. It was simply a drive of frustration. I couldn’t get to sleep and I made the very poor choice that I would go out and go for a drive.”

    yeah right. dude got busted coming home from hangin with his mistress, among other things


  12. rain of lead
    12 | January 5, 2013 6:41 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    oh yeah?
    what other things?
    need some tawdry gossip


  13. coldwarrior
    13 | January 5, 2013 6:43 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    oh yeah?
    what other things?
    need some tawdry gossip

    i’m gonna bet that everything i bolded is a lie.


  14. Calo
    14 | January 5, 2013 6:52 pm

    I sent CarolinaGirl 10 pounds of Starbuck’s finest coffee beans to keep her quiet today and not post about football.

    It Worked!
    The Texans I knew earlier this season are back today. :cool:


  15. coldwarrior
    15 | January 5, 2013 6:53 pm

    @ Calo:

    ahhh…a bribe! smart move.


  16. coldwarrior
    16 | January 5, 2013 6:53 pm

    Search for Spitfires to begin

    Work is to begin on unearthing dozens of missing British Spitfires thought to have been buried in the Burmese jungle at the end of the Second World War.

    A team of experts is flying out today to search for unused and unassembled aircraft which 
they believe were packed into crates and buried by the RAF 
in 1945.

    Farmer and aviation enthusiast David Cundall, from Lincolnshire, is spearheading the dig, having spent 17 years and ­thousands of pounds researching the project.


  17. 17 | January 5, 2013 7:02 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    He’s righteous man!
    ///


  18. Dolphin
    18 | January 5, 2013 7:02 pm

    @ coldwarrior:
    Kinda like “I smoked it, but didn’t inhale”!


  19. 19 | January 5, 2013 7:03 pm

    @ Calo:

    Charles does look like a toad.


  20. coldwarrior
    20 | January 5, 2013 7:03 pm

    @ Rodan:
    @ Dolphin:

    yeah…


  21. 21 | January 5, 2013 7:10 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    Hey cut him some slack. he was stressed out defending family values!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ///


  22. huckfunn
    22 | January 5, 2013 7:24 pm

    Dolphin wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Kinda like “I smoked it, but didn’t inhale”!

    Ah, Billy Jeff; the linguistic gymnastic Olympian. “We had sex but I didn’t impale”.


  23. coldwarrior
    23 | January 5, 2013 7:26 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ coldwarrior:
    Hey cut him some slack. he was stressed out defending family values!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ///

    its a stressful life being defender of the faith family


  24. Dolphin
    24 | January 5, 2013 7:26 pm

    @ huckfunn:
    Or.. the definition of “it”


  25. coldwarrior
    25 | January 5, 2013 7:28 pm

    Dolphin wrote:

    @ huckfunn:
    Or.. the definition of “it”

    is…what the definition of ‘is’ is.

    and the gop rolled right over for him as well.


  26. song_and_dance_man
    26 | January 5, 2013 7:41 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    jeeze, cj…lay off the hfcs and the deep fried lard balls.

    And the salt lick and can of Crisco.


  27. 27 | January 5, 2013 7:42 pm

    @ coldwarrior:

    They should have hammered Clinton on his ties to the PLA via James Riaddy.


  28. song_and_dance_man
    28 | January 5, 2013 7:43 pm

    Is it just me, or do they look like they’re in a Juche march?


  29. song_and_dance_man
    29 | January 5, 2013 7:46 pm

    Dolphin wrote:

    the definition of “it”

    ‘It’ depends on what the definition of ‘it’ is.

    Slightly amended Wetspeak.


  30. song_and_dance_man
    30 | January 5, 2013 7:53 pm

    Looking at the pic, despite the photoshop job, the girth scale is fairly close. Look at the jowls of both men and the dimensions are close. Foster could be a contender for The Biggest Loser, twice over.


  31. huckfunn
    31 | January 5, 2013 7:57 pm

    song_and_dance_man wrote:

    Looking at the pic, despite the photoshop job, the girth scale is fairly close. Look at the jowls of both men and the dimensions are close. Foster could be a contender for The Biggest Loser, twice over.

    Tweedledee & Tweedledumb?


  32. song_and_dance_man
    32 | January 5, 2013 8:10 pm

    @ huckfunn:
    That’s it.

    Well back to the wild card game


  33. poteen
    33 | January 5, 2013 8:24 pm

    coldwarrior wrote:

    Search for Spitfires to begin

    Can you imagine what they are worth today? Historically, monetarily and just plain coolness.


  34. 34 | January 5, 2013 8:45 pm

    @ song_and_dance_man:I’d like to see both of them do the ReRun Dance.


  35. poteen
    36 | January 5, 2013 9:14 pm

    http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2013/01/05/a_mindless_debate_over_us_troops_in_afghanistan_100453-2.html

    At this point in time, all of these problems and issues raise more negatives than positives-a reality that no amount of shallow public affairs claims and propaganda can cover up. At the same time, much of this may reflect the Obama administration’s lack of plans, reporting, and leadership. There are many positive as well as negative indicators. It is possible that credible plans and analysis, and a focus on the real issues involved rather than meaningless manpower totals, would make the case for staying. This, however, will require the president to realize that no one follows where no one leads.


  36. eaglesoars
    37 | January 5, 2013 9:28 pm

    poteen wrote:

    This, however, will require the president to realize that no one follows where no one leads

    Did you miss the memo? He’s leading from behind…………aka using human shields


  37. 38 | January 5, 2013 9:33 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Calo:
    Charles does look like a toad.

    Hell, I bet he has even smoked a couple of toads… :shock:


  38. rain of lead
    39 | January 5, 2013 9:46 pm

    doriangrey wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Calo:
    Charles does look like a toad.

    Hell, I bet he has even smoked a couple of toads…

    no, he’s licked toads and smoked poles


  39. 40 | January 5, 2013 9:49 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    Rodan wrote:
    @ Calo:
    Charles does look like a toad.
    Hell, I bet he has even smoked a couple of toads…

    no, he’s licked toads and smoked poles

    Well,that too… :oops:


  40. huckfunn
    41 | January 5, 2013 9:51 pm

    Ol’ Sarge sez heh.


  41. rain of lead
    42 | January 5, 2013 9:55 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    besides, how would you smoke a toad?
    them things would be a bitch to light


  42. poteen
    43 | January 5, 2013 9:59 pm

    eaglesoars wrote:

    Did you miss the memo? He’s leading from behind…………aka using human shields

    He’s always behind. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more timid president. Reid and Pelosi send him out to make a speech, the same speech, whenever they want, and he obliges. Talk about your useful tools.


  43. 44 | January 5, 2013 10:13 pm

    rain of lead wrote:

    @ doriangrey:
    besides, how would you smoke a toad?
    them things would be a bitch to light

    Not to mention being all slimy they have to be a bitch to get in the bowl…


  44. Bumr50
    45 | January 5, 2013 10:14 pm

    @ rain of lead:
    @ doriangrey:

    Vaporize it.


  45. rain of lead
    46 | January 5, 2013 10:21 pm

    @ doriangrey:

    nah
    just chop it up real fine


  46. 47 | January 5, 2013 10:25 pm

    BWAHAHAHAH… Here is a little girl, that would make Charles Johnson weep like a little girl…


  47. Bumr50
    48 | January 5, 2013 10:40 pm

    I vote we put it in a blender!!

    //


  48. 49 | January 5, 2013 10:56 pm

    Bumr50 wrote:

    I vote we put it in a blender!!
    //

    Surely you mean Charles and not the poor toad… :shock:


  49. 51 | January 5, 2013 11:07 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Here we go!


  50. eaglesoars
    52 | January 5, 2013 11:15 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ eaglesoars:

    Here we go!

    I’m not sure why I think this -- but I think he’s done this before.


  51. lobo91
    53 | January 5, 2013 11:47 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    I wonder when we’ll see one to repeal the 2nd Amendment?

    Apparently Feinstein’s crap bill will be introduced on the 22nd in the Senate.


  52. eaglesoars
    54 | January 5, 2013 11:50 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ eaglesoars:

    I wonder when we’ll see one to repeal the 2nd Amendment?

    Apparently Feinstein’s crap bill will be introduced on the 22nd in the Senate.

    I forget where I read this -- probably multile sites -- or I’d post a link -- but I read that Biden’s ‘commission’ is going to focus on what can be done by executive order and there will be a blizzard of proposed regs in order to overwhelm the NRA.

    Which is probably the dumbest thing the admin can do. Obama’s ass will end up in court and probably SCOTUS to boot.


  53. lobo91
    55 | January 5, 2013 11:52 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Which is probably the dumbest thing the admin can do. Obama’s ass will end up in court and probably SCOTUS to boot.

    When did he start caring about what the courts say?


  54. eaglesoars
    56 | January 6, 2013 12:02 am

    lobo91 wrote:

    When did he start caring about what the courts say?

    Oh he doesn’t. Lisa Jackson’s EPA has lost just about EVERY lawsuit, DOJ just lost the South Carolina voter id case, Interior had ignored SCOTUS rulings -- and every time they figured they’d lose. But they think that the simple aggravation of having to go to court will over time be exhausting and people will just surrender/give up.

    SCOTUS has no enforcement ability. That no one in Interior has been frog marched to jail by U.S. Marshals for contempt of court is telling.

    But guns? That’s not something the media will ignore as it has everything else.


  55. eaglesoars
    57 | January 6, 2013 12:07 am

    off to do some reading -- nite everyone


  56. 58 | January 6, 2013 12:37 am

    @ eaglesoars:

    Oh hell, no.

    I might write this jackass and suggest he repeal the 22nd & make Obama ‘President for Life’, just to see if he’d go for it.


  57. 59 | January 6, 2013 6:01 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Calo:
    Charles does look like a toad.

    Most real toads are useful and beneficial -- except, of course, for those dratted cane toads imported into Australia.

    rain of lead wrote:

    doriangrey wrote:
    Rodan wrote:
    @ Calo:
    Charles does look like a toad.
    Hell, I bet he has even smoked a couple of toads…

    no, he’s licked toads and smoked poles

    On a more serious note, if you have a cat or dog, you’ll want to discourage them from attempting to eat toads.

    The psychoactive toxins in toad skin are intended to thwart predation -- sometimes by killing the predator.


  58. Speranza
    60 | January 6, 2013 5:29 pm

    IS that the tag team combo of Haystacks Calhoun and Gorilla Monsoon?


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David