When it comes to foreign policy, I am very disgruntled with the Republican Party. Learning the wrong lesson from 9/11, the GOP now has Nation Building as one of it’s core ideological tenets. American interests are no longer the Party’s concern. It’s all about Global and Islamic interests. Like the Democrats, The GOP supports the agendas of the Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
Radio host Michael Savage has had enough. He is now calling for a new Nationalist Party to challenge the GOP from the right.
The conservative radio host Michael Savage Sunday called for a third, “nationalist” American political party to challenge the Republican Party on the right of the political spectrum.
“We need a nationalist party in the United States of America,” said Savage on Aaron Klein’s WABC radio show.
“You have the rudiments of a new party in this country called a Tea Party. They need to restructure their party. They need a charismatic leader, which they don’t have,” he said. “When you say Tea Party no one knows who the leader is because there is no leader. No man has stepped forward who can lead that party.”
Savage is the third-most widely heard radio talker in the country, and a leading voice among conservatives seeking an alternative to the Beltway Republican Party.
I agree with Michael Savage. Some may cringe at the term Nationalists since the Leftist Nazis used that term. Nationalism just means putting your national interests first.
Personally, I wish the Republican Party would adopt a national interest based foreign policy. But just like the Democrats, they are Transnational Progressives who do the bidding of Islamic interests. When someone challenges the The GOP’s Pro-Globalist/Islamic foreign policy, they get called isolationist and areshunned.
Despite Michael Savage’s call I don’t see anything changing. Too many Republican voters blindly support any military action whether it’s in America’s interest. One day the American Right will wake up and realize they have been fooled. A strong defense does not mean getting involved in conflicts on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia and Gulf States.
Tags: Michael Savage, Nationalism
It’s pure suicide for conservatives/libertarians to form a third party and split their votes with the weakened RINO-Republican party. The country is divided about 50/50. (actually Obama got 50.4% in the last election) If the new “Tea” party gets 25%, and the old RINOs get 25% the Commie/Socialist/Progressive Democrats will skunk them in the election.
A better strategy would be for the Tea party to take over the Repubs. Vote the RINOs out in the primaries like Ted Cruz did to the RINO Dewhurst in Texas, or Mike Lee to the RINO Bennet in Utah.
So, get involved with your local Republican Central Committee, become a precinct captain. Maybe run for local office, … Don’t just sit there.
One of my co-workers I think is precinct captain. One of a surprising number of conservatives at my office- a call center where most of us make about $12/hr, including bonus.
Welcome to the Stout Hemp Rope Party…
Fritz Katz wrote:
Using that logic I might just as well join the Democrat party, because they don’t represent my political views either.
Fritz Katz wrote:
Trying.
In case you hadn’t noticed, the Republicans are a bit uneasy about the whole thing…
Why Nationalist Party when the Balanced Party would do?
@ Fritz Katz:
The problem is that even the local GOP is controlled by a click that takes orders from the RNC. There is no originality in thinking nor tactics. On foreign policy the GOP is all about nation building and interventionism on behalf of global and Islamic interest.
@ Bumr50:
Plus some ion the Tea Party support nation building. It’s time for a new movement about America’s interests.
Nacionalista? Al igual que Francisco Franco?
If it’s called the Nationalists, it will be at war with the Eastern Alliance very very soon!
[Plunks down 10,000 Quatloos to The Osprey]
No one can convince my that starting a third party could make things any worse than they already are or will be in the near future. Supporting the Gutless Old Party is a dead end.