First time visitor? Learn more.

Corpulent Fake Guido attacks NRA over anti-Obama ad

by Rodan ( 147 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2016, Progressives, Republican Party, Second Amendment at January 18th, 2013 - 7:00 am

The loudmouth Corpulent Guido rushes to Obama’s aid again. The NRA ran a very effective ad showing the hypocrisy of Obama’s position of armed guards in schools. They pointed out that Obama’s daughters go to a school that has armed guards. Christie condemns the brutal ad exposing the ads of his god-king.

Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ), who has been campaigning for the media’s new favorite Republican, is now making his journey toward the dark side complete with a misguided assault on a new ad from the National Rifle Association. The NRA ad points out that President Obama is more than happy for his children to have security guards, but thinks that proposals regarding more security in schools for other children is out of the question. Christie said today:

To talk about the president’s children, or any public officer’s children, who have not by their own choice, but by requirement, to have protection, and to use that somehow to try to make a political point is reprehensible …. To somehow feel, as it said in the commercial, “Well, the president has armed bodyguards for his children but thinks it’s not good enough for your children,” the president doesn’t have a choice …. It’s awful to bring public figures’ children into the political debate. They don’t choose to be there. For any of us who are public figures, you see that kind of ad and you cringe.

Christie has a press conference where he ranted about gun violence.

Chris Christie is enjoying the favorable coverage he is receiving from the Progressive Media. He wants the love of the Left, so he goes after the NRA. He thinks the support of the media will help win the GOP nomination by claiming to be the most electable who can win. The media once loved John McCain before he took on the god-king and they turned on him. Christie is a fat pig being set up for the slaughter.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

147 Responses to “Corpulent Fake Guido attacks NRA over anti-Obama ad”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | January 18, 2013 7:38 am

    He couldn’t get elected National Dog Catcher (if there were such a thing)…


  2. Prebanned
    2 | January 18, 2013 7:49 am

    @ Mike C.:
    No but he could win the Republican primary.
    sadly

    I saw Chris being interviewed and he said he had no idea why he was so fat and if he knew he would do something about it.

    Chris, do you exercise?
    Chris, have you tried a low carb diet?


  3. eaglesoars
    3 | January 18, 2013 7:51 am

    But he’s putting together a TASK FORCE people!! He’s DOING something!!

    The task force’s review comes in the context of a state with among the toughest gun laws in the nation, including an existing assault weapons ban. Nonetheless, Governor Christie wants a full assessment to consider whether additional common sense measures are appropriate for New Jersey.

    There’s that term again -- ‘common sense’.


  4. 4 | January 18, 2013 7:51 am

    Christie is, himself, reprehensible. I don’;t see how anyone considers him fit for higher office. He may be the best New Jersey can do, but that is because New Jersey is a waste. I wouldn’t live there for any amount of money.


  5. 5 | January 18, 2013 7:52 am

    The “Gun Rights” debate illuminates the stark differences between “Urban” and “Rural” America and underscores why the tyranny of the majority has been the fundamental liberal key to victory. We’re amidst a Cultural Cold War with deep chasms between the large urban areas and smaller cities/rural areas that shows no signs of abatement.


  6. citizen_q
    6 | January 18, 2013 7:57 am

    What will be funny and oh so predictable is how the MFM and his demoncrap supporters putting this corpulent opportunistic POS will turn on him if he opposes a demonrat in an election with import.

    Look at how they luved mcshame until he ran his half-assed campaign against comrade zero.


  7. 7 | January 18, 2013 7:59 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    He may be the best New Jersey can do, but that is because New Jersey is a waste. I wouldn’t live there for any amount of money.

    By Jersey standards, he’s “conservative”. You and I live in a similar area, demographically speaking, and we’re speaking a wholly different language than these urban north easterners.


  8. 8 | January 18, 2013 7:59 am

    @ MacDuff:

    It also underscores who takes the Constitution seriously. You will note that the most strident anti-gun voices are also some of the most radically “pro-choice” voices out there. They have no real respect for the Second Amendment (“shall not be infringed…”), but believe a right found nowhere in th etext of the Constitution should be the most protected right of all.


  9. 9 | January 18, 2013 8:04 am

    @ MacDuff:

    I realize that, but people like Christie are too regional for a national ticket. He’d lose in a landslide if he somhow won the nomination. It isn’t just that I wouldn’t vote for him. His opinion on gun rights (and therefore the Constitution) are so far out of the mainstream of Republican thought that most Republicans wouldn’t vote for him. I don’t see how he wins the Primaries, myself. We’d do better nominating a “conservative” Democrat like Phil Bredesen if we are going to go that far.


  10. 10 | January 18, 2013 8:16 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    I realize that, but people like Christie are too regional for a national ticket. He’d lose in a landslide if he somhow won the nomination. It isn’t just that I wouldn’t vote for him. His opinion on gun rights (and therefore the Constitution) are so far out of the mainstream of Republican thought that most Republicans wouldn’t vote for him. I don’t see how he wins the Primaries, myself. We’d do better nominating a “conservative” Democrat like Phil Bredesen if we are going to go that far.

    All true, anyone who thinks Christie could win nationally is sadly mistaken; he’s unappealing on any number of levels and is a creature that can only politically prosper in a place like New Jersey. He has his entertaining moments, but he’s bereft of the tools and temperament to be President.


  11. 11 | January 18, 2013 8:17 am

    This is good news:

    GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) — From Oregon to Mississippi, President Barack Obama’s proposed ban on new assault weapons and large-capacity magazines struck a nerve among rural lawmen and lawmakers, many of whom vowed to ignore any restrictions — and even try to stop federal officials from enforcing gun policy in their jurisdictions.

    “A lot of sheriffs are now standing up and saying, ‘Follow the Constitution,’” said Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilbertson, whose territory covers the timbered mountains of southwestern Oregon.

    The article is wrong about one thing, though:

    But their actual powers to defy federal law are limited. And much of the impassioned rhetoric amounts to political posturing until — and if — Congress acts.

    If they refuse to arrest people, refuse to prosecute people for violating these laws, the law is pretty impotent. As I pointed out the other day, the BATF simply doesn’;t have enough Agents to actually police the entire United States. They rely on local law enforcment to do this. If local law enforcement does nothing, there isnt a whole lot the Feds can do to them. It is like the “Sanctuary Cities” that are popular with the Left. We can have entire Sanctuary States where the Federal gun laws simply aren’t enforced.


  12. 12 | January 18, 2013 8:17 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    If Christie was the GOP nominee, I bet you the other Center-Right Candidate let’s say Rand Paul would probably out poll Christie. The Fat Guido probably would end up in 3rd place.


  13. 13 | January 18, 2013 8:19 am

    @ eaglesoars:

    ‘common sense’ aka the common good aka Communism.


  14. 14 | January 18, 2013 8:21 am

    @ MacDuff:

    By Jersey standards, he’s “conservative”.

    The funny part is that Chris Christie is actually a Social Conservative. he’s against Gay Marriage and Anti-Abortion. He’s more of an opportunist than a Progressive.


  15. 15 | January 18, 2013 8:24 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    If local law enforcement does nothing, there isnt a whole lot the Feds can do to them. It is like the “Sanctuary Cities” that are popular with the Left. We can have entire Sanctuary States where the Federal gun laws simply aren’t enforced.

    That’s when the “Cultural Cold War”, mentioned above, becomes a bit warmer. Polarization is the life blood of the Obama Administration and they see this as a gold-plated opportunity.


  16. rain of lead
    16 | January 18, 2013 8:26 am

    mornin ya’ll
    it’s Friday!


  17. 17 | January 18, 2013 8:28 am

    @ rain of lead:

    Morning!


  18. RIX
    18 | January 18, 2013 8:28 am

    Good morning. Was Christie offended that Obama used children as props,
    to exploit the Sandy Hook children?


  19. 19 | January 18, 2013 8:29 am

    @ MacDuff:

    the one advantage The Left has is that the Right is fractured.


  20. 20 | January 18, 2013 8:29 am

    @ rain of lead:

    We have snow! Yay! It wasn’t enough to keep me out of th eoffice, but it was real snow. We haven’t had a real snow in several years.


  21. rain of lead
    21 | January 18, 2013 8:30 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    awww!
    I miss snow


  22. 22 | January 18, 2013 8:34 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Yes, I refer to it as the Cold Civil War, a turn of phrase I stole from Mark Steyn. Back in the ’90s, I used to work uot from time to time with a police officer who told me point blank that he wouldn’t enforce any gun control laws. He’s just one officer, though. He didn’t make department policy. These sherrifs can. Sherrif is usually an elected position, so these people are more in tune with the electorate than Police Chiefs who are usually appointed. My experience in this state is that law enforcement officers in general don’t want anything to do with gun control. That is probably different in the Northeast and on the Left Coast.


  23. 23 | January 18, 2013 8:37 am

    @ Iron Fist:
    Nice. We are expecting for of the hated stuff and lows next week of -21 Celsius.


  24. rain of lead
    24 | January 18, 2013 8:37 am

    But, will they listen?
    (magic 8-ball says no)

    Rank and file tell GOP leaders to keep sequester, shutdown ‘on the table’

    GOP leaders on Thursday heard from rank-and-file members in a closed-door session, with many urging sequester cuts or a government shutdown to take effect in hopes of forcing the White House into accepting spending cuts.

    Those options are “very much on the table,” veteran Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters on Thursday, from Virginia, where House GOP lawmakers are meeting for their annual retreat.

    The goal of the battles to come, as one high-ranking GOP leadership aide explained to The Hill, “is to force a process where the House acts, the Senate acts and the two bodies work it out.”

    Influential GOP lawmakers such as former vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.) say that the House wants to “force” the Senate to act independently on extending the debt limit, rearranging the sequestered cuts and extending current government funding, but many lawmakers and aides concede privately that it will be difficult to do so.


  25. 25 | January 18, 2013 8:40 am

    @ RIX:

    He has said nothing.


  26. RIX
    26 | January 18, 2013 8:42 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:

    He has said nothing.

    And I doubt that he will. He seems to have a man crush on
    Obama & Bruce Springsteen.


  27. 27 | January 18, 2013 8:43 am

    Christie is doing what he is doing because he knows the Republican Party is hated by most of the public including many Republicans. So he’s trying to paint himself as not tied to the Party. That’s part of what is at work here.


  28. bluliner10
    28 | January 18, 2013 8:45 am

    Dear mainstream media, Governor Christie and everybody else who hyperventilated regarding the NRA advertisement regarding the school the President’s daughters attend. It is not that the Secret Service has a detail to ensure their safety. That is a fact. Yes, if the President’s daughters were harmed in anyway, that would indeed be damaging to the security of the Nation, as the President would be focused on more personal concerns than the general welfare of the American People. No, the point of the ad was that the school itself has 11 full-time armed security personnel regardless of whose child is attending. Quit twisting the facts to suit your narrative. For the reason stated above, I might acquiesce that the Obama girls are more “important” than mine, but David Gregory’s children are not worth a bucket of spit on a cold day.


  29. rain of lead
    29 | January 18, 2013 8:46 am

    I am SHOCKED! SHOCKED I say…..
    wait…. no I’m not,not really

    Fast and Furious Gun Found at Murder Scene Was Purchased By Embattled ATF Supervisor

    A Fast and Furious gun found at the murder scene of Mexican beauty queen Maria Susana Flores, appears to have been purchased by embattled ATF supervisor George Gillett. Flores was used as a human shield before she was shot and killed by Mexican cartels during a shootout with the Mexican military.

    According to documents obtained by Senator Chuck Grassley, it appears Gillett purchased a number of different firearms at a gun dealership in Phoenix as part of Operation Fast and Furious. It also appears Gillett lied on 4473 forms by using an address that does not lead to his residence, which is a felony


  30. 30 | January 18, 2013 8:47 am

    @ RIX:

    He’s 2 face backstabber. I despise Chris Christie and wish nothing well for him. I get he has beef with the GOP, so do I but the way he’s going about it is wrong.


  31. 31 | January 18, 2013 8:49 am

    @ bluliner10:

    Good morning to you!

    No, the point of the ad was that the school itself has 11 full-time armed security personnel regardless of whose child is attending. Quit twisting the facts to suit your narrative. For the reason stated above, I might acquiesce that the Obama girls are more “important” than mine, but David Gregory’s children are not worth a bucket of spit on a cold day.

    There is a double standard for the media. They are Feudal elitists. In their world view, the elites get to have their kids in safety, while the peasants do not. What you see is Elitism. The NRA ad struck A NERVE AND I am glad.


  32. 32 | January 18, 2013 8:50 am

    @ rain of lead:

    Nothing will come out of this. The Obama Regime will get away with this.


  33. RIX
    33 | January 18, 2013 8:51 am

    @ rain of lead:
    In a non bizzaro world Fast & Furious would have brought down
    Obama & Holder etal.
    Watergate was a two bit burglary with a ridiculous coverup.
    But nobody died.


  34. 34 | January 18, 2013 8:52 am

    @ RIX:

    Obama could rape a boy on TV and the public will appluad. He’s invincible politically at this point.


  35. RIX
    35 | January 18, 2013 8:53 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:

    He’s 2 face backstabber. I despise Chris Christie and wish nothing well for him. I get he has beef with the GOP, so do I but the way he’s going about it is wrong.

    i had higher hopes for Christie, but he is headed down a bad road.
    When you become the Democrats favorite Republican, it’s time to
    stop what you’re doing.


  36. 36 | January 18, 2013 8:54 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ rain of lead:

    We have snow! Yay! It wasn’t enough to keep me out of th eoffice, but it was real snow. We haven’t had a real snow in several years.

    I hope you guys down there enjoy it, thank gawd we missed this round! Winter in the bane of my existence.


  37. bluliner10
    37 | January 18, 2013 8:55 am

    @ Rodan:
    Oh yes it did. I have been quietly biting my tounge for a few days now…before I could type something that would not get me charged with contempt for officials…


  38. RIX
    38 | January 18, 2013 8:55 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:

    Obama could rape a boy on TV and the public will appluad. He’s invincible politically at this point.

    The media would gush at how elegantly he performed the rape.
    “Bravo never done better!”


  39. rain of lead
    39 | January 18, 2013 8:55 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ RIX:

    Obama could rape a boy on TV(then rip out his heart and eat it) and the public will appluad. He’s invincible politically at this point.

    fify
    all good demons eat their victims hearts when they are done with them.


  40. 40 | January 18, 2013 8:57 am

    bluliner10 wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Oh yes it did. I have been quietly biting my tounge for a few days now…before I could type something that would not get me charged with contempt for officials…

    Gotcha man and just be careful, you will be out soon enough and can say what’s really on your mind.


  41. RIX
    41 | January 18, 2013 8:58 am

    All of this fuss about Manti T’eo & the imaginary girlfriend.
    Imaginary people vote in Chicago all of the time, along
    with people that no longer exist.


  42. 42 | January 18, 2013 8:58 am

    @ rain of lead:

    You are right on that. Obama can institute Aztec human sacrifice and the Media would justify and the public support it.


  43. bluliner10
    43 | January 18, 2013 8:59 am

    @ Rodan:
    My wife now can explain the bolt assembly, the upper and lower receiver of the AR-15 though! Next stage is taking one down and putting it back together.


  44. 44 | January 18, 2013 9:00 am

    @ RIX:

    When you become the Democrats favorite Republican, it’s time to
    stop what you’re doing.

    He’s being set up for a big fall. He should ask John McCain and Mitt Romney. yes Romney got favorable press coverage up until the GOP nomination fight. They kept saying how formidable he is. As we saw, he was a terrible candidate.


  45. 45 | January 18, 2013 9:01 am

    bluliner10 wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    My wife now can explain the bolt assembly, the upper and lower receiver of the AR-15 though! Next stage is taking one down and putting it back together.

    That’s really a good skill to know. I’m pretty stacked up on ammo and some prepper stuff myself.


  46. RIX
    46 | January 18, 2013 9:04 am

    @ Rodan:
    Do you remember all of the Libs saying that they feared Huntsman?
    Man, they wanted to run against him.


  47. rain of lead
    47 | January 18, 2013 9:04 am

    *blink**blink*
    bwahahahahahahaha

    Awkward: Why isn’t FLOTUS following her hubby on Twitter?

    As Twitchy reported, Michelle Obama has snagged herself a second Twitter account for her birthday. The thing is, out of the 15 lucky souls she currently follows, her hubs isn’t one of them


  48. RIX
    48 | January 18, 2013 9:05 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ rain of lead:

    You are right on . Obama can institute Aztec human sacrifice and the Media would justify and the public support it.

    They would gush over his cultural sensitivity.


  49. 49 | January 18, 2013 9:10 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Do you remember all of the Libs saying that they feared Huntsman?
    Man, they wanted to run against him.

    They were going to destroy him. The media was hyping Rick Santorum during the primary. The truth is the Democrats do not fear any Republican. They know they have an infrastructure advantage and will destroy any GOP who runs.

    That is why I really do not want Marco Rubio to run. First in the GOP primaries there is an element of the Party that will go all out to destroy him. If he survives that, you will see the racist nature of the Left on full display. He’s a good guy even though I disagree with his foreign policy, I do not want to see him destroyed personally.

    The reason I want Rand Paul is because he will give the Left the fight of their lives. They will destroy him, but he will move on. Rubio should wait until 2020.


  50. MikeA
    50 | January 18, 2013 9:13 am

    @ Rodan:

    Thats good. Pity I lost all of my guns in a tragic boating accident.


  51. 51 | January 18, 2013 9:15 am

    MikeA wrote:

    Pity I lost all of my guns in a tragic boating accident.

    Pity I lost all of my guns in a tragic boating accident.

    What happened?


  52. RIX
    52 | January 18, 2013 9:16 am

    @ Rodan:
    Yup , the Media would set out to destroy Rubio.
    They tried to make paul Ryan look evil!


  53. 53 | January 18, 2013 9:17 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Yup , the Media would set out to destroy Rubio.

    They will have help from many on the GOP side in that. He needs to stay put until 2020. He’s young and doesn’t have to rush things.


  54. 54 | January 18, 2013 9:19 am

    @ RIX:

    I saw a report yesterday abou thow the media is ignoring the story of a real dead girl from Notre Dame. She apparently comitted suicide after being sexually assaulted by a football player. The article was in Salon. I don’t have the link this morning, but it is an interestin gpoint abou tthe priorities of the MFM.


  55. MikeA
    55 | January 18, 2013 9:19 am

    @ Rodan:

    Right after Obama signed his executive orders, they were lost. Darn shame. ;)


  56. 56 | January 18, 2013 9:20 am

    @ MikeA:

    I sold all my guns at gun shows. I didn’t even give a receipt for them.


  57. 57 | January 18, 2013 9:23 am

    MikeA wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Right after Obama signed his executive orders, they were lost. Darn shame.

    Gotcha! An Alligator ate mine!


  58. 58 | January 18, 2013 9:24 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ MikeA:
    I sold all my guns at gun shows. I didn’t even give a receipt for them.

    I got rid of mine because a psychiatrist could rule me insane!
    ///


  59. 59 | January 18, 2013 9:25 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:
    I saw a report yesterday abou thow the media is ignoring the story of a real dead girl from Notre Dame. She apparently comitted suicide after being sexually assaulted by a football player. The article was in Salon. I don’t have the link this morning, but it is an interestin gpoint abou tthe priorities of the MFM.

    Funny how that works?


  60. MikeA
    60 | January 18, 2013 9:27 am

    @ Rodan:

    Too late. You are conservative (and I know where you work) so you are CERTIFIABLY INSANE!!!!!


  61. eaglesoars
    61 | January 18, 2013 9:28 am

    sure are a lot of tragic boating accidents ’round these parts.


  62. eaglesoars
    62 | January 18, 2013 9:30 am

    Gun owners who fear the agenda of creeping confiscation are soundly justified. “What we can when we can” is no empty slogan. It was part of the strategy that resulted in the full-scale gun bans that were recently overturned by the United States Supreme Court. When gun owners objected in the 1970s that Washington, D.C.’s gun registration program was never supposed to be used to confiscate guns, they were rebuffed by the bureaucratic response, that “someone else made that promise we didn’t say that”.

    Sure, the Supreme Court has said there is a right to keep and bear arms. But that was a 5-4 decision, and members of the Court, Justice Ginsburg, notably, have openly hoped that a “future wiser court” will reconsider the question.


  63. eaglesoars
    63 | January 18, 2013 9:31 am

    linky for my #62


  64. 64 | January 18, 2013 9:33 am

    MikeA wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Too late. You are conservative (and I know where you work) so you are CERTIFIABLY INSANE!!!!!

    Plead guilty to my insane beliefs in free markets, individualism and hate of Islamism.


  65. 65 | January 18, 2013 9:33 am

    @ eaglesoars:

    It is too bad Ginsberg didn’t die when W was President.


  66. 66 | January 18, 2013 9:33 am

    eaglesoars wrote:

    sure are a lot of tragic boating accidents ’round these parts.

    I had an alligator incident!


  67. 67 | January 18, 2013 9:34 am

    @ MikeA:

    That is what the Left would like to do about guns. They don’t mind guns in the hand sof rich Liberal Elites. Nor do they mind them in the hands of minority gangbangers in the inner city. It is when peasants like us have them that they are worried.


  68. 68 | January 18, 2013 9:35 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ eaglesoars:
    It is too bad Ginsberg didn’t die when W was President.

    That would have been no guarantee. See John Roberts.


  69. 69 | January 18, 2013 9:38 am

    @ Rodan:

    Roberts is better than Ginsberg. Even on the ObamaCare decision. Ginsberg would have upheld it as partt of the Commerce clause. That would have been a much worse disaster. I still think Roberts is a coward. I think he made the decision because he didn’t want the Court to be called “Partisan”, but that doesn’t change the fact that he made it. We’ll see what he does with the religious liberty questions that are coming before the Court. He has made one bad decision so far. Let’s hope he finds his spine and doesn’t make others.


  70. Speranza
    70 | January 18, 2013 9:39 am

    Christie’s speech at the RNC in Tampa was awful. It was all about his fat self while never praising Romney or criticizing Obama.


  71. eaglesoars
    71 | January 18, 2013 9:40 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ eaglesoars:

    It is too bad Ginsberg didn’t die when W was President.

    Before John Roberts’ ruling on Obamacare I would have agreed with you

    Rodan wrote:

    I had an alligator incident!

    Yeah, it ate your boat……….

    gotta go


  72. RIX
    72 | January 18, 2013 9:40 am

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ RIX:

    I saw a report yesterday abou thow the media is ignoring the story of a real dead girl from Notre Dame. She apparently comitted suicide after being sexually assaulted by a football player. The article was in Salon. I don’t have the link this morning, but it is an interestin gpoint abou tthe priorities of the MFM.

    That was Lizzy Seeberg, a St. Marys student across the road from ND.
    She brought sexual assault charges against an ND player to Campus
    Police. Coach Kelly never made the player available.
    The poor girl committed suicide. Problem solved, no witness.
    Also under Kelly a student, Declan Sullivan was sent up on a sissors lift
    to film apracice in 60 mile an hour winds.
    He was killed when the lift blew over.


  73. Speranza
    73 | January 18, 2013 9:40 am

    eaglesoars wrote:

    But he’s putting together a TASK FORCE people!! He’s DOING something!!

    “Task force” another term along with “catfishing” and “fiscal cliff” I never want to hear.


  74. The Osprey
    74 | January 18, 2013 9:45 am

    That’s right, you’re not from Texas, but Texas wants you anyway.

    Texas AG runs ads in New York urging NY gun owners to move to Texas and bring their guns.

    http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/18/texas-attorney-general-runs-ads-in-new-york-inviting-gun-owners-to-move-to-texas/


  75. citizen_q
    75 | January 18, 2013 9:49 am

    O/T

    During the National Rifle Association’s meeting with Vice President Joe Biden and the White House gun violence task force, the vice president said the Obama administration does not have the time to fully enforce existing gun laws.

    Jim Baker, the NRA representative present at the meeting, recalled the vice president’s words during an interview with The Daily Caller: “And to your point, Mr. Baker, regarding the lack of prosecutions on lying on Form 4473s, we simply don’t have the time or manpower to prosecute everybody who lies on a form, that checks a wrong box, that answers a question inaccurately.”

    Submitting false information on an ATF Form 4473 — required for the necessary background check to obtain a firearm — is a felony punishable by up to ten years in prison, depending on prior convictions and a judge’s discretion, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    Yet if you listen to comrade zero and the other totaltarians trying to eliminate our civil rights under the 2nd Amendment you’d think there were hardly any laws at all rather than a confusing constellation of them that by bite-me’s own admission they can’t follow.

    They still demagogue wanting more to restrict our rights, and if you look at comrade zero’s proposals wants to intrude on the doctor patient relationship to make medical professionals agents of the government.


  76. 76 | January 18, 2013 9:51 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Odd, isn’t it? If they refuse to arrest illegals under the law, this administration applauds them.

    @ Rodan:

    As usual, the MSM has a comprehension problem. The point of the ad was not that the President’s photo props daughters don’t deserve protection -- they do; as do mine if I want the school to have it. He’s against it. Just like he let the school voucher program lapse and sends his photo props girls to private school.


  77. The Osprey
    77 | January 18, 2013 9:52 am

    Speranza wrote:

    eaglesoars wrote:

    But he’s putting together a TASK FORCE people!! He’s DOING something!!

    “Task force” another term along with “catfishing” and “fiscal cliff” I never want to hear.

    “Common sense gun laws” and “reasonable restrictions”.


  78. citizen_q
    78 | January 18, 2013 9:52 am

    The Osprey wrote:

    That’s right, you’re not from Texas, but Texas wants you anyway.

    Lived in Dallas from 94 to 99. Moved back to MD in my townhouse I had been renting out while I was living in TX. Just bought a house a couple of years ago, and can’t bear the thought of moving again and going through that whole process.

    But I have been thinking of moving back to TX and America.


  79. 79 | January 18, 2013 9:53 am

    citizen_q wrote:

    if you look at comrade zero’s proposals wants to intrude on the doctor patient relationship to make medical professionals agents of the government.

    That is OK as long as it doesn’t interfere with abortion. Anything that interferes with abortion has to be put aside, because the Constitution says that the right of the people to abortion shall not be infringed8O


  80. RIX
    80 | January 18, 2013 9:53 am

    Rodan wrote:

    RIX wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    Yup , the Media would set out to destroy Rubio.

    They will have help from many on the GOP side in that. He needs to stay put until 2020. He’s young and doesn’t have to rush things.

    Any Republican has to think about he & his family being smeared.
    They went after Ann Romney in a vicious way.
    Moochelle? Never happen.


  81. 81 | January 18, 2013 9:54 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    We’ll see what he does with the religious liberty questions that are coming before the Court.

    I’m not holding my breath.


  82. bluliner10
    82 | January 18, 2013 9:54 am

    @ Carolina Girl:
    Spot on analysis. Exactly the topic of my rant.


  83. 83 | January 18, 2013 9:55 am

    Wonder if the Fatass from Trenton will find THIS reprehensible as well:

    http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/17/unreal-anti-gun-group-releases-ad-tying-gop-congressman-to-newtown-massacre/


  84. 84 | January 18, 2013 9:55 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    I don’t think it’s comprehension problem. i think it’s outright propaganda.


  85. 85 | January 18, 2013 9:57 am

    @ Rodan:

    Oh, I’m hopeful on this one. They could have just said the Obamacare issue was settled and refused to grant cert. I’m crossing my fingers that Roberts wants a “do-over” and this is the way to get it.

    Of course, it’s the Friday before a 3-day weekend, the local team is in the NFC conference championship and I scored two great bottles of 2007 Merlot, so I’m filled with optimism this morning.


  86. citizen_q
    86 | January 18, 2013 9:57 am

    RIX wrote:

    Any Republican has to think about he & his family being smeared.
    They went after Ann Romney in a vicious way.
    Moochelle? Never happen.

    Don’t forget the media lynching of Sahara Palin and her family, especially Tryig.

    One of the most disgusting displays I’d seen to date.


  87. 87 | January 18, 2013 9:58 am

    @ Rodan:

    I was trying to be kind, which is, I know, completely out of character for me.


  88. 88 | January 18, 2013 9:58 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    This is where having a good Republican propaganda corps would be useful. We need to get the fact out that the gun controllers want you unarmed in the face of a mass shooting. They are trying to take away your civil rights. There is no difference between President Obama standing behind his Presidential Podium and Orville Faubus standing in the schoolhouse door. There is no difference between being pro-gun control and being pro-segregation. Both are anti-civil rights positions.


  89. 89 | January 18, 2013 10:01 am

    Speranza wrote:

    Christie’s speech at the RNC in Tampa was awful. It was all about his fat self while never praising Romney or criticizing Obama.

    He’s a an opportunist and backstabber.


  90. 90 | January 18, 2013 10:02 am

    I also am wondering, by the way, if the word went out to the media from the Obama (criminal enterprise) Administration that they were to couch any opposition or criticism of their 23 Strongly Worded Letters from Wednesday as like fighting for the Civil Rights Act. Because several pundits have raised that specter and it is absolutely not on point, but it sure sounds good. The analogy is bogus.

    The NRA is doing exactly what Republicans did in the Civil Rights Act debates. Securing the rights guaranteed to a group of individuals who would have it abridged by a goverment.


  91. 91 | January 18, 2013 10:05 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama picked on the wrong rights group when he thought he could attack the NRA with impunity. People are joining the NRA now that don’t even OWN guns. A membership is $25/year -- that means the NRA has collected over $6 million in dues in the last MONTH. And word spreads -- via Twitter and the blogs!


  92. RIX
    92 | January 18, 2013 10:05 am

    @ citizen_q:
    The assault on the Palin family was despicable.
    The Libs particularly like the description by a female Canadian journalist,
    “A hillbilly married to an Eskimo, wit a slut daughter & a crazy baby.”


  93. 93 | January 18, 2013 10:06 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    The NRA is a civil rights organization. That can’t be stressed often enough. They are, in fact, one of the oldest civil rights organizations in the nation.


  94. 94 | January 18, 2013 10:07 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    I was trying to be kind, which is, I know, completely out of character for me.

    You’re slipping!

    :lol:


  95. 95 | January 18, 2013 10:08 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Yep. I’m a life member, but I’ve got to get the Old Lady signed up. This has really motivated her on the Second Amendment. She sees what they are trying to do to us. After living with me all these years, she has a better appreciation of the Second Amendment and its place in the constellation of our rights and liberties.


  96. 96 | January 18, 2013 10:11 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    I wish I had your optimism!


  97. 97 | January 18, 2013 10:11 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Obama picked on the wrong rights group when he thought he could attack the NRA with impunity. People are joining the NRA now that don’t even OWN guns. A membership is $25/year — that means the NRA has collected over $6 million in dues in the last MONTH. And word spreads — via Twitter and the blogs!

    My cousin emailed the other day to tell me that he joined the NRA….he doesn’t own, nor has he ever owned a gun.


  98. 98 | January 18, 2013 10:14 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Have you seen OFA now claiming they will destroy the NRA?


  99. huckfunn
    99 | January 18, 2013 10:19 am

    West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S.
    Of all of the terrorist groups targeting the U.S., it seems a bit peculiar that this “think tank” would see “right wing extremists” as worthy of comment. I wonder if they’ll do a piece regarding the known violence of the SEIU, OWS and the democrat party. Hmmmm… scratches head.


  100. 100 | January 18, 2013 10:21 am

    @ Rodan:

    “Segregation yesterday, segregation today, segregation forever!”

    Those were Democrats, too. The tide of history is against them here. Even with control of the media, the NRA has higher favorables than the President on this issue. Obama is picking a fight he can’t win, and one that could have consequences for 2014. I bet that most of the 20 Democrat Senators who are up for re-election in 2014 wish Obama ould just shut up on this issue. Even Al Franken has doubts about renewing the AWB. I doubt that Reid can get the 60 votes necessary to move such legislation forward, and he might have trouble getting the 50 votes needed to pass it. It’ll go nowhere in the House. Not unless the Republicans decide to comitt suicide. I think they like their cushy jobs too much to do that.


  101. RIX
    101 | January 18, 2013 10:28 am

    @ huckfunn:
    I remember well when Johnson went on a rant about violence
    from veterans & the Tea Party. He sounded like an imbecile.


  102. 102 | January 18, 2013 10:29 am

    @ Rodan:

    It’s the prospect of good football and merlot. Plus I’m having a new stove delivered tomorrow! Cheap thrills.


  103. 103 | January 18, 2013 10:31 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama would be stupid to push on this issue. He has the GOP on the verge of collapse and has made the part become despised by the American public. If he goes full throttle on Gun bans, it will give the GOP a lifeline. That is why Harry Reid will not bring it up. The Dems are looking at dominating the nation until the 2020′s, why blow it?


  104. 104 | January 18, 2013 10:31 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ Rodan:
    It’s the prospect of good football and merlot. Plus I’m having a new stove delivered tomorrow! Cheap thrills.

    AH OK, gotcha!


  105. 105 | January 18, 2013 10:31 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S.
    Of all of the terrorist groups targeting the U.S., it seems a bit peculiar that this “think tank” would see “right wing extremists” as worthy of comment. I wonder if they’ll do a piece regarding the known violence of the SEIU, OWS and the democrat party. Hmmmm… scratches head.

    They’re regurgitating out an old meme, aren’t they? As I recall, Napolitano was grousing about this more than two years ago.


  106. 106 | January 18, 2013 10:32 am

    @ Rodan:

    They’re planning a nationwide whistle-stop campaign to promote their “common sense” gun proposals. I’m still waiting for a reporter to ask about the 500 murders in Chicago last year. Personally, I think it’s all bluster to gin up money from the base.

    They can’t beat the NRA. Isn’t tomorrow, by the way, “stand up for gun rights day”? Hope it is and that everyone hasn’t forgotten. I’d love to see turnout in the millions. I’m checking on it and if true, I’m heading to the gun store in Vacaville (and maybe get some time on the indoor range).

    I


  107. 107 | January 18, 2013 10:33 am

    @ Rodan:

    You and Speranza want to talk for a spell on Sunday? Same time, same channel? See if “M” wants to play, too?


  108. 108 | January 18, 2013 10:34 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Obama is really overconfident. His arrogance is the only thing that might save the GOP. He has the Republican Party on the verge of irrelevancy at the national level, why would he give them a lifeline? The election really got to his head.


  109. 109 | January 18, 2013 10:34 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    Sounds like a plan!


  110. huckfunn
    110 | January 18, 2013 10:35 am

    RIX wrote:

    @ huckfunn:
    I remember well when Johnson went on a rant about violence
    from veterans & the Tea Party. He sounded like an imbecile.

    Number of rapes, assualts and murders at Tea Party events still at zero. The other noteworthy point about that article is that the “Combating Terrorism Center” is actually a part of West Point. A couple nights ago we had a brief discussion of how the left has now co-opted our military institutions. When the military has muzz sensitivity training and a “green fleet”, there’s not much doubt that they have won.


  111. huckfunn
    111 | January 18, 2013 10:38 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    They’re regurgitating out an old meme, aren’t they? As I recall, Napolitano was grousing about this more than two years ago.

    Is it any wonder that Homeland Security has bought up over a billion bullets in the past year?


  112. 112 | January 18, 2013 10:40 am

    @ huckfunn:

    That’s why Civil War talk is silly on the part of Conservatives. There’s no guarantee the military would be on our side. Plus they can always bring in NATO and the Jihadists.


  113. The Osprey
    113 | January 18, 2013 10:43 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    They can’t beat the NRA. Isn’t tomorrow, by the way, “stand up for gun rights day”? Hope it is and that everyone hasn’t forgotten. I’d love to see turnout in the millions. I’m checking on it and if true, I’m heading to the gun store in Vacaville (and maybe get some time on the indoor range).

    Yes, it is. We’re having a rally here in Phoenix at the State Capitol at noon.


  114. RIX
    114 | January 18, 2013 10:46 am

    @ huckfunn:

    Number of rapes, assualts and murders at Tea Party events still at zero. The other noteworthy point about that article is that the “Combating Terrorism Center” is actually a part of West Point. A couple nights ago we had a brief discussion of how the left has now co-opted our military institutions. When the military has muzz sensitivity training and a “green fleet”, there’s not much doubt that they have won.

    The Left is relentless in pushing their agenda. They learn
    nothing from history.
    The secret to their success is an obedient Entertainment/Media
    Complex.


  115. huckfunn
    115 | January 18, 2013 10:47 am

    It’s all very disturbing. The Dept. of Injustice sells thousands of guns to drug cartels which results in the slaughter of uncounted Mexicans. Not one U.S. official has been prosecuted. The Top-Turd-in-Chief ™ goes on a gun-grabbing campaign. DHS buys a billion rounds. Not good.


  116. 116 | January 18, 2013 10:48 am

    @ Rodan:

    Rodan, interesting Goldberg blog post, as well as an equally interesting column in the same vein.


  117. huckfunn
    117 | January 18, 2013 10:48 am

    I guess I’d better work on some work.

    Later…


  118. 118 | January 18, 2013 10:50 am

    @ huckfunn:

    Obama has no opposition, he can do as he pleases. When the Media is your propaganda arm, you can do what you like. This is dictatorship.


  119. RIX
    119 | January 18, 2013 10:50 am

    News for Woman smothers boyfriend with her boobs

    Daily Mail
    Woman Uses Breasts to Smother, Kill Boyfriend, Report Claims
    The Hollywood Gossip -- 4 hours ago -- 71 related articles »
    A Washington woman is accused of using her breasts to smother and kill her boyfriend after an altercation at their mobile home

    Clearly Boobs must now be regulated.
    I will volunteer for Boob Czar. This will take intense &
    lengthy research.


  120. 120 | January 18, 2013 10:51 am

    @ RIX:

    The secret to their success is an obedient Entertainment/Media
    Complex.

    Yup, hence Obama can do what he likes right now.


  121. 121 | January 18, 2013 10:52 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    Is it any wonder that Homeland Security has bought up over a billion bullets in the past year?

    No it isn’t. It makes me wonder if DHS is being morphed into that “Civilian National Security Force” he spoke of in 2008.


  122. 122 | January 18, 2013 10:53 am

    RIX wrote:

    Clearly Boobs must now be regulated.
    I will volunteer for Boob Czar. This will take intense &
    lengthy research.

    “Assault Breasts”


  123. RIX
    123 | January 18, 2013 10:54 am

    @ Carolina Girl:

    They’re planning a nationwide whistle-stop campaign to promote their “common sense” gun proposals. I’m still waiting for a reporter to ask about the 500 murders in Chicago last year. Personally, I think it’s all bluster to gin up money from the base

    Chicago is the proof statement for how silly most gun laws are.
    Criminals job description is breaking laws.
    Let’s look at real guns abuse, Fast & Furious.


  124. heysoos
    124 | January 18, 2013 10:55 am

    @ Rodan:
    which will hopefully lead to his downfall…his attitude sucks and more people are getting the picture…he’ll do something really stupid, but will he pay the price for it?…shit happens, people change their minds


  125. lobo91
    125 | January 18, 2013 10:56 am

    @ huckfunn:

    I just downloaded a copy.

    I’ll take a look at it when I get a chance.


  126. RIX
    126 | January 18, 2013 10:57 am

    MacDuff wrote:

    RIX wrote:
    Clearly Boobs must now be regulated.
    I will volunteer for Boob Czar. This will take intense &
    lengthy research.
    “Assault Breasts”

    How many in a boobs “Magazine Clip?”
    Boobs kill, keep them away from children.
    Sandra Fluke will soon become the spokes thing.


  127. 127 | January 18, 2013 10:57 am

    @ lobo91:

    Lobo -- do you get credit if I buy NRA merchandise using your link?


  128. 128 | January 18, 2013 10:57 am

    @ MacDuff:

    Great article! I’ll do a headline on them.


  129. RIX
    129 | January 18, 2013 10:58 am

    @ MacDuff:
    Hey, Obama is coming for your boobs!
    “Out of my cold, dead hands.”


  130. 130 | January 18, 2013 10:59 am

    @ MacDuff:

    That is why when the GOP if it ever gets back power, should dismantle the police state.


  131. RIX
    131 | January 18, 2013 10:59 am

    Later Gators.


  132. 132 | January 18, 2013 11:00 am

    Rodan wrote:

    @ MacDuff:

    Great article! I’ll do a headline on them.

    Libertarianism is going mainstream.


  133. 133 | January 18, 2013 11:00 am

    New Thread.


  134. taxfreekiller
    134 | January 18, 2013 11:01 am

    This Christy Cream Christy, he fart this loud all the time?

    Can you imagine the sounds his poor wife must endure every night?


  135. 135 | January 18, 2013 11:01 am

    Thug the President now apparently trying to “regulate” what he couldn’t pass into law:

    http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/18/after-failing-to-pass-disclose-act-obama-bypasses-congress-attempts-to-force-companies-to-reveal-political-donations-through-the-sec/#disqus_thread

    Uh, Jerk and rest of criminal enterprise. The State Bar of New York thanks you. You just put thousands of billable hours on the table for some of the best corporate lawyers in the U.S.


  136. 136 | January 18, 2013 11:01 am

    @ Rodan:

    The State can’t win an assymetric war. In fact, had the South chosen to fight an assymetric war in 1861 instead of a heads-up confrontation they might very well would have won. In any event, a Sherman=style March Through Georgia isn’t on the Military’s todo list. What you’d have wouldn’t be set-piece battles. It would be resistance to things like unconstitutional gun sweeps and mass arrests.


  137. 137 | January 18, 2013 11:04 am

    huckfunn wrote:

    The Top-Turd-in-Chief ™ goes on a gun-grabbing campaign. DHS buys a billion rounds. Not good.

    In the last two months, though, Americans have bought over 2 million new guns.
    These people aren’t buying them to turn them in when Obama says to.


  138. taxfreekiller
    138 | January 18, 2013 11:05 am

    Well if Obooba thinks he can rule the U.S. with his over weight and brain dead DHS people, wow,,, me I would say not fair to go there,
    I would have a hard time giving the order to fire on those hapless things if Obooba and the commie Democrats ever sets them aginst U.S..

    Hopeless in uniforms.


  139. 139 | January 18, 2013 11:07 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    There is a way to win. But it would require many Conservatives ( not your or I) to give up their hatred of the Russians. Russia is a Rightwing Capitalist Christian nation. In a civil war scenario If the American Right reaches out, I would not be shocked if the Russians assist the Conservative insurgency. Also, in my case because of family connections, I can actually get some Colombians who might be down to help out.

    But all this is just theories and remote. Hopefully it will never come to pass.


  140. Speranza
    140 | January 18, 2013 11:07 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    Speranza

    I’m up for the “foursome”. lol.


  141. 141 | January 18, 2013 11:07 am

    @ Speranza:

    Hey check out the new thread!


  142. 142 | January 18, 2013 11:11 am

    Rodan wrote:

    But all this is just theories and remote. Hopefully it will never come to pass.

    Hopefully. The States are our surest defense, or at least our front-line defense. Did you see the article I linked about the sherrifs who are saying they’ll refuse to enforce these laws? There aren’t enough BATF fanatics to police the entire United States. They have to rely on local law enforcement in these things. It’ll be like th esanctuary cities in California. The law will be on the books, but the locality will simply refuse to do anything about it.


  143. 143 | January 18, 2013 11:21 am

    @ Iron Fist:

    Yes I read that. During Prohibition, many localities ignored it.


  144. lobo91
    144 | January 18, 2013 11:58 am

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ lobo91:

    Lobo — do you get credit if I buy NRA merchandise using your link?

    Just memberships


  145. darkwords
    145 | January 18, 2013 1:59 pm

    Walks like a democrat, talks like a democrat, cracks like a democrat.


  146. darkwords
    146 | January 18, 2013 2:00 pm

    @ 144 lobo91: I’ll re up my laxed membership through your link


  147. darkwords
    147 | January 18, 2013 2:01 pm

    @ 142Iron Fist: we need to make it known to federal officials that they are persona non grata in local towns and cities. They can all live in Canada or Mexico.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David