Some things in life defy description. Yesterday, one of those things happened. Our Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, finally put an end to her long, and often comical delay of answering any questions relating to the single worst foreign policy debacle since 1978. The tactics used to delay the on-the-record Q & A included birthday parties abroad for foreign dignitaries never before seen in the presence of any U.S. diplomat, let alone our very top one, faking several, as in more than two, illnesses which magically occurred at the last moment, and of course simply refusing to appear for months on end.
Of all of the quotes that came out of yesterday, this one has to be top of the list of any American who cares in the slightest about any reasonable semblance of accountability that our Executive Branch should be held to.
What’s the Difference why these people were killed?
Putting aside for the moment that righteous indignation is a faux tactic only ever employed by the incredibly guilty, I nearly jumped through the office television in a vain attempt to confront a woman who clearly holds a low opinion of the American People, those brave souls who died as a direct result of her incompetence, and more specifically the very few public officials who dared to ask questions of a member of the self anointed elite class of dictatorial rulers known as the Obama Administration.
Hillary hardly faced the tough questions yesterday that were deserved of such a travesty. Two, count them two Senators dared to cross that line separating fawning dotage and actual inquiry. Ron Johnson and Rand Paul seem to be the only two Senators on the Foreign Affairs Committee interested in understanding what accountability for the consequences of stupidity should look like.
Bear in mind that the whole goings on in Benghazi represent that rare instance in American political scandal where the crime was far, far, worse than the pitiful attempt at cover up. The crime was that we put into place the world’s dumbest foreign policy, a second time. Not content with the unmitigated disaster suffered time and again during the Carter years, the Kumbayah School of foreign policy again was instituted. Shockingly, the very same result was gleaned as the last time we tried to pretend that projecting American weakness abroad would really get our enemies to respect us. The plan was, that when we extended an olive branch to the Muslim world in response to their giving us the finger, they would suddenly realize that we meant them no harm, and Unicorns would begin shooting rainbows out of their hind parts, and all would be well in the world.
Unfortunately, that worked no better in 2012 than it did in 1978. Four Americans paid for the naivete with their lives, and the cover up of this stupidity went almost completely unreported by a sycophantic American Media.
The difference dear Hillary, and any who took the inexplicable position of championing her obfuscation today, is that these people died as a direct result of the idiotic policy agenda enacted by Hillary Clinton. Rather than beef up security in a world hot spot in response to the danger there, created by herself, She attempted to keep Americans from realizing that she had put our interests abroad in that danger. As a result, four people lost their lives, and after begging her to do something in order to help them stay safe.
The pitiful lies told by the Administration in the aftermath of this lunacy are only secondary to the real problem at hand. The real problem here is that our foreign policy is at best moronic, and at worst, treasonous. Pretending that Islamofascism does not exist will only lead to more of these disasters in the future. Guess what, we just sold these very same people in the Muslim Brotherhood some F-16′s.
Let’s not forget the small fact that the producer of that moronic film, seen by no one coincidentally, is still imprisoned, because apparently the First Amendment does not protect the rights of those who are a convenient scapegoat for our President.
We are halfway through this thing, officially on the back nine. Hunker down, thank God that it can all be corrected, and realize that no changes to our Constitution have been permanently enacted yet.
Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.
We haven’t had a good foreign policy since the end of the Reagan era, although you can make a case for Poppy. Clinton, Bush and Obama all suck on foreign policy.
“What’s the difference?” Well, that’s fine if she’s talking about Bill cheating on her left and right, but this is about national security and the death of Americans here.
I don’t think we really have a foreign policy…at least well defined and articulated…these frat boys just react and make stuff up as they go along, oblivious to the body count…and nobody calls them out
@ heysoos:
Our foreign policy is either Nation Building or Appeasement. There’s no realistic course.
Only Prince Harry of the elite goes into battle
@ heysoos:
Probably just as well, since we’ll no longer have a military:
Hillary rolled the Senate & House Committees.
The Dems drolled all over her being totally impressed
that she is a frequent flyer.
The Republicans with the exceptions of Ron Johnson,
Rand Paul & John McCain were unprepared.
The unprepared members should have givenn their time
to those three.
We do have a foreign policy.
Buttcrack Obama’s foreign policy is to treat our Friends as Enemies and our Enemies as Friends. His goal is to destroy all trust and respect any Country had in America.
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Standards For Combat Units Then Standards May Be Lowered…
This is a very stupid statement. planned destruction of the UNited States.
waldensianspirit wrote:
Can we revert back and have him as a leader???
@ lobo91:
The real goal is to demilitarized the military.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
The Republican foreign policy of nation building and supporting the Muslim Brotherhood isn’t a better alternative. Both parties suck at foreign policy.
That is why I don’t take Republican criticisms of Obama on foreign policy serious. What’s their alternative?
@ SciFiGuy:
The higher the rank of the military officers, the more they remind
me of corporate execs trying to please the CEO.
it just seems to me like Lt. Cols are the most focused on their
actual job descriptions.
@ 6 lobo91: If he wants to lead the lower standard trained troops into combat personally, then I could reserve my judgement of him as being hopelessly out of touch with the enemy.
Keynote Speaker for Association of Teacher Educators: Bill Ayers
Cory Booker should rescue Chris Christie from his carb overload. Bloomberg would approve.
@ RIX:
Maybe they get Derek Jeter as a spokesman!
@ darkwords:
I like Corey Booker. Too bad he’s Democrat, he would be formidable for our side.
Jeter seems like a good guy, but he is over his head.
Maybe he can join with Sheryl Crowe & the renowned
Climatologist Charles Foster Johnson & form a think tank.
So Trumka isn’t happy, boo efin hoo.
Doesn’t this thug remind you of a cast member on the Sopranos?
Rodan wrote:
What we have today is the result of not teaching honest History in the schools. Both Parties are filled with ignorant idiots that are clueless about making real foreign policy based on the historical facts of what works and what doesn’t.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Yup! Add in Saudi and Gulf money and presto, a perfect storm!
@ RIX:
The Unions will go ballistic once this ruling has a little time to sink in…
Rodan wrote:
History also shows us that these storms never end well…
Hard to see how this will be overturned. Technically the Senate was
still in session.
Obama got too cute by half.
@ lobo91:
That is exactly why women shouldn’t be allowed into combat. Decisions like this will get people killed. That is what they want.
@ RIX:
The ruling actually went a good deal further than that. Take a look over at The Volokh Conspiracy.
Wanna know why I hate Slate?
Iron Fist wrote:
I see you are at DOD. Did you check out the Ludwig banning?
Rodan wrote:
I like that he went out of his way to help that dog. That’s really endearing, and Booker has demonstrated common sense in the past but was too easily smacked down by the Progs in charge.
@ Rodan:
I saw that! Most of the time I can’t read DoD during the day. My work firewall has it blocked as “Adult Material”
@ Iron Fist:
I have a post tomorrow on the origins of Dogs. This will be the Left’s next targets, Pets. Just you wait and see.
@ Iron Fist:
Probably because of the Penis Penis stuff that goes on over there.
Newt gives the smackdown to the soutpiel!
Newt Gingrich to Piers Morgan: “Lovely Propaganda”
@ Urban Infidel:
He will go nowhere in the national Democrat Party. They maybe interested at first because he’s Black, but once they see he’s not a Leftist, he will be shunned.
Rodan wrote:
Soutpiel soutpiel soutpiel! LOL.
Buzz Ballad: “The Difference Made.”
How Romney Lost: How Obama Won.
I’m posting this for the tech types here. The cover post is over at the Tatler here.
There is a link to a download which I hope the tech folks here will look at.
I hope they study it and consider what it means—for the country, for conservatives, for themselves in terms of what they can glean from this to assist conservative candidates in the next election. I understand only some of it.
The upshot is that Obama’s campaign built a truly formidable tracking, testing campaign using online means, to target donors, to track voters, to shape the campaign’s advertising. Romney’s campaign failures with his untested get-out-the-vote software was nothing; he had already lost, or nearly so, by the time it failed.
Go and look.
Thanks, i just looked over there.
Even if the Supreme Court takes it on appeal, I expect the decision to
be affirmed.
Technically the NLRB couldn’t have a quorum during those rulings.
I think that not only is this latest Supreme Court ruling going to drive the unions crazy but when their man Obama tries to take their guns they are going to go off the reservation big time.
Just a hunch.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Oh, good, I was looking for you. Have a look at this when you get the chance. Shabbat Shalom.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
There’s no way the Republican Party as structured can compete with this. The Dems will win every election until the GOP gets rid of the old guard.
This is scary stuff and the foundations of a One Party State.
Moe Katz wrote:
Interesting. Yet another attempt to make fragmentary scientific data substitute for morality and justify political constructs.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
So now you’re a neuroscience maven?
Moe Katz wrote:
Apparently you neither understand how to read popular press articles critically, nor are aware that they must be read critically, nor are aware that what is passed off as “science” has for decades been busy trying to put a “scientific” gloss on social agendas to remove the social agendas from debate—particularly, though not solely, in this area.
RIX wrote:
White Hut is already making it clear that they will continue to ignore court rulings they don’t agree with because they know nobody will stop them from doing what they want to to do anyways…
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Yeah, but that’s a two-edged knife. They can ignore the court here, but the businesses negatively impacted can ignore the NRLB, and the Courts will back them up. What you are seein g is the break-down of the rule of law from these unlawful and unwise actions by the Obama Administration.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
from the article:
Guillamon isn’t sure whether the four regions are at all associated with notions of gender, but Ivanka Savic-Berglund at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, thinks they might be. One of the four regions – the superior longitudinal fascicle – is particularly interesting, she says. “It connects the parietal lobe [involved in sensory processing] and frontal lobe [involved in planning movement] and may have implications in body perception.”
In other words, a guess
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Maybe that was true but maybe it ain’t.
Look the inducements don’t necessarily have to be money — at least not up front.
My impression is this. Obama had twice as much staff for the same cost that Romney was expending if you looked at what they were “officially” paid. But the difference is that Obama gave these folks a seat at the table sort-of-speak rather than make them subserviant to political operatives. This is a non-monetary exchange that encouraged participation. It is not really technology as much as psychology.
@ Iron Fist:
Read Buzz’s #38. This should send chills down the spine of any Democrat Party opponent.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
I am not familiar with White Hut. Did they get a bad NLRB ruling?
whosoever wrote:
The Microbe
—Hillaire Belloc
The Microbe is so very small,
You cannot make him out at all,
Yet many sanguine people hope
To see him through a microscope.
His jointed tongue which lies beneath
A hundred curious rows of teeth;
His seven tufted tails with lots
Of lovely pink and purple spots,
On each of which a pattern stands,
Composed of forty separate bands;
His eyebrows of a tender green;
All these have never yet been seen—
But Scientists, who ought to know,
Assure us that they must be so…
Oh! let us never, never doubt
What nobody is sure about!
@ unclassifiable:
The Democrats have their stuff together when it comes to campaigns. The current Republican Party can not compete against this.
Iron Fist wrote:
Not just a small break down, but a full collapse could be beginning here if enough companies take this ruling and run with it.
whosoever wrote:
It’s what us tech folks call a swag, a Scientifically Wild Ass Guess.
RIX wrote:
Obama’s White Hut is located at 1600 Pennsylvania Av., Washington DC, 20006.
@ The Osprey:
Bet that left a mark.
EgyptAir reviews in-flight movies after Islamist complaint
Put a fork in ‘em. They’re done.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I’ve read a statement by someone who stated he knew Obama would win before the election because of how the campaign was using “big data”, basically tools that are capable of extracting information from very large data stores. One of the observations made was that the Jugears campaign was able to target advertising down to the household level. One example given was that the campaign identified donors to pro-abortion groups and would send campaign advertising propaganda a our the Republican “war on womenses” to those households, even if they were in neighborhoods that were strongly pro-life (think heavily catholic areas) while sending advertising about entitlement compassion to the neighbors, thus motivating the abortion supporters while not alienating those voters who were not thrilled about supporting a baby killer but who supported having other people pay the living expenses of those not working. (OK, those weren’t his exact words, but that was the bottom line). Basically the obummer campaign targeted its positions down to the household level. That is not so much smart as devious. Dude who wrote the exposition was gushing about how smart it was to use big data to target the message.
@ Rodan:
That was not always the case.
Do you really think “The Plumbers” just died a quiet death?
There are many manifestations of them now in both parties and they have gotten slick enough to avoid detection and arrest.
What buzzsawmonkey is focusing on is a different aspect. The technology is the pointer dog on this but you still have to handle the quarry sort of speak.
I am still reading the Analytics brief for that piece of the election machine.
This really is an outrage. They should entertain all credible proposals.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Got it. There actually is a White Hut hamburger restaurant.
@ RIX:
It is much more important that people live in a tent city until Union labor can be used to get them out, than it is to get them out with non-union labor.
@ Rodan:
I read it, but I’m not sure I believe it. If Obama had perfected the Election Machine, he’d have won the Hous and a filibuster-proof Senate.
RIX wrote:
Fast-food hamburger joints, back in the Twenties and Thirties, used to be called “whitefronts”; it was common for a burger quickie lunch counter to have a street facade, even in an urban commercial row on an old-fashioned street, that was done in white tile. It was a common thing, even if it was not a chain—white-tile front meant “quickie hamburger joint” the same way swinging doors meant “saloon.”
White Castle, which became a chain, was only one of the thousands of “whitefronts”; it became a white freestanding building as America moved to the suburbs. I was not aware that there were other “whitefront” chains, but apparently White Hut is one.
Iron Fist wrote:
Not if he only used it for himself, and figured his coattails would suffice.
RIX wrote:
There’s a White Castle not far from me. First time hearing about White Hut hamburgers.
@ AZfederalist:
Spot on AZ!
Tell a different lie to different people and make them all think they are getting something. They used the general increasing isolation of the population (neighbors don’t know neighbors) to fashion a strategy were everyone who voted for O thought they were going to get something.
On a different note, returning to my “buy in” theme there is this:
Again when your soldiers get in on the spoils they tend to fight better. In this case they were in control of the message and new it. They did not have to worry that some political consultant pinhead was going to waste all that effort by some fuzzy emotional fiat.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Always learning something new around here…
Rodan wrote:
Whether it be Democrat or Republican, LIBERAL policies are designed to fail in protecting America’s interests, at home or abroad.
Rodan wrote:
Reagan scholars may be able to find the exact quote or the context, but I believe when asked what his foreign policy was, Reagan replied: “It’s simple. We win.”
@ Carolina Girl:
Hey, CG! Two Ballads up at the Tatler, if you haven’t seen ‘em; haven’t the time to post links right now.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I’ll take a peek, Buzz!
Sorry I have been so neglectful to my brothers and sisters in arms this week, but I’ve been buried in witness interviews, and Speranza and Rodan will vouch that I haven’t been on the email either.
(Twitter yes -- there’s an APP for that!)
@ AZfederalist:
Now let’s fast forward to now.
Obama has won.
But now he must govern.
Can he take guns from unions and please them?
Can he enroll Catholics in an anti-gun crusade and force them to fund contraception through Obamacare?
Can he expect support from Jews when he bolstering Muslim Brotherhood?
There are these little bubbles one can see developing. The realization that you have been had.
On our side of the fence this is easy. We already thought Obama was a terrible president and we still lost. Our pre-election pissed-offedness is just transaitioning to post-election pissed-offedness.
But when you are happy and you know it and you dutifully clap your hands over his re-election and you find they are full of shit — what then?
I suspect this is intentional but it goes more towards part of the Cloward-Piven strategy than anything else. They have to destroy rule of law. That will give entre to rule by raw power. This is the key ingredient to totalitarianism.
@ Iron Fist:
You know pretty early on the Obama campaing told the down ticket Dems not to expect any help because Obama campaign was trailing in fundraising to Romney. The documentation buzzsawmonkey provided via PJM showed that at one point the Obama campaign was extremely worried about the fund raising gap. But through the approach AZfederalist outlined and described in the document in more detail they were able to target their fundraising to be more efficient — more productive.
That is a disgrace.We are sending aid all over the World.
These re our people. Take the lowest credible bids (They will be non-union)
and get these people back into their homes.
@ unclassifiable:
Of course, having a trillion-dollar slush fund to give your your donors in the form of “grants” so that they in turn funnel it back to you is helpful, too. And he’s had one every year he’s been in office thanks to baseline budgeting. Everyone says the Senate Dems refused to pass a budget because we’d know what the spending was. I say it’s because if they didn’t, that trillion dollar stimulus from the previous budget stayed in there and Obama was able to funnel more and more money. Pass a budget and that slush fund is removed. Of course, the Dems thought that Obama would share this largesse. I imagine they were more than a little annoyed when he didn’t.
@ unclassifiable:
And those that should know better remain clueless:
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus has been overwhelmingly re-elected to his post by committee members.
BTW Rodan -- if we ever do another “Diary of Daedalus” edition of the radio show, we should get Drew from Weasel Zippers as a guest.
White Hut is in Mass.
White Castles are the best at two in the morning after adult beverage.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
I’m sure that committee was chock-full of Reagan conservatives.
Carolina Girl wrote:
There’s also a piece—now off the front Tatler page, but in the archives—called “Reason not the Need”, which is a short essay, not a verse parody, that I think will interest you.
@ RIX:
In Mass. my favorite was Friendly’s. Are they still around? The Fribble was to die for.
Carolina Girl wrote:
they are big in Wisconsin.
When I am in the Boston Area, I like Legal Seafood.
RIX wrote:
Oh don’t I know it…
@ Carolina Girl:
I think some Team Obama post-election forensics would be interesting.
RIX wrote:
Man comes to Boston, gets in a cab, has the cabbie drive him around to look at the city. Taps on the divider, and asks him, “Where can I get scrod?”
The cabbie says, “I’ve been driving a cab for twenty years, and that’s the first time I’ve ever heard someone use the pluperfect of that verb.”
This girling by the joint chiefs and commie Obama etal.
My bet is they think the real fighting men of the all vol. military will start to leave the f’d up place and only the go along types will joins and or stay.
They want an Army that will turn its guns on U.S., the current ones will not obey those orders. If they by hook or crook or lie and fruad and diliberate pissing off the good guys and they leave the commie hate American Democrat Party just might manage to get enough thugs in to shoot at U.S. from behind and for sure out in the islamic world let the evil ones win for the commies goals.
In My Not So Humble Opinion
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I am not sure if White Hut is a chain or a single Restaurant.
I used to have White Castle as a client.
There Corporate offices were a store front in a strip mall
in Bridgeview, Il.
At that time they never took a bank loan, but built all of their stores with cash.
I am sure that has changed.
taxfreekiller wrote:
Speaking of that, and of the end of DA/DT, one of the early slogans of the (communist) Gay Liberation Front was, “An Army of Lovers Cannot Lose!”
@ buzzsawmonkey:
That’s good.
@ unclassifiable:
Then there are the irrregularities in his website turning the verification features on and off to keep foreign contributions out. I know that in 2008, many people complained that donations were being made on their credit cards and then credited right back. Federal Election Commission totally ignored it.
I think he believes he’s safe in what he does until 2014. That’s why he really wants to get amnesty going -- I think he’s quite worried about a Republican Senate coming after him. Right now if the House impeached him for his criminal acts, it wouldn’t matter. Senate would never convict.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Yeah, I’m sure al-Qaeda will take that into account. Right after they behead them for being lovers.
Put ms tfk’s idea of funding the NRA big time for two to four years all around today.
Vote yes around 80%
Vote no fund the RNC 10%
Vote for NRA and real conservatives direct 10%
so there she goes with the idea, will report how the rest of her buddies think on this later
@ Carolina Girl:
Clinton actually became more popular after the House impeached him.
Obama has the race thing working & his popularity would go through
the roof.
Only the mean ass drill sgt. line in the sand keeps U.S. free now.
Should that group slow or missplace its work, we of the U.S. are in big trouble.
So far the commies and the elites have prevented the draft from forceing some decipline on many 18 year olds, now they step it up to force the drill sgt.’s to do things they know are bad and will not work. They want to cut the pride, the spirt of the corps. To mold the civil society to their dark ends.
@ RIX:
Yeah, but with Clinton, it was basically about the lying under oath and subornation of perjury about sex, which many thought was overboard and harmless (they were wrong -- you might ask Mark Fuhrman about how harmless perjery is). This creep and his criminal enterprise are committing actual violations of the Constitution and are indirectly responsible for the deaths of 300 Mexican nationals and Brian Terry. They make Richard Nixon look like an amateur.
Would the House impeach? Probably not. But that lying sack of shit criminal in the White House knows he’s safe as long as there aren’t 60 GOP in the Senate.
Mark Levin pointed out that if they are planning a program of women in combat, if they ever have to re-instate the draft for any reason, they will be hard pressed to explain why it should be limited to just men.
I imagine that “women in combat” policy will last right up until the time the daughter or granddaughter of a Democrat Congress Critter gets a low lottery number.
@ RIX:
Obama is impeachment proof. It’ll never happen. It is slightly more likely (though still unlikely) that Obama will have a veto overriden and an executive order or two nullified. That isn’t likely, but it is far more likely than impeachment. They wouldn’t impeach Obama if he cut Michelle Antionette’s head off in th eOval Office on camera.
@ Carolina Girl:
I agree with every word of that. But Obama has the race card and a slobbering
Media.
he runs a criminal enterprise and should be read his Miranda Rights, though.
unclassifiable wrote:
Not a SCOTUS ruling -- a panel ruling of the Federal District Court for DC. That’s two steps down.
Second Obama agency ignores an appellate court ruling:
From the NLRB:
Let’s all remember that Interior didn’t lift the drilling ban after being told to my a judge.
Carolina Girl wrote:
To convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required.
@ Mike C.:
I’m sorry. I was wrong.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
And there’s the rub. The Democrats control the Senate. There’s no way enugh of them would vote to vcconvict for it to actually be possible. I frankly doubt you could get one Democrat Senator to vote for conviction, no matter what the charge.
Iron Fist wrote:
It was after watching the farce that was the Clinton Senate trial I realized just how bad the 17th Amendment was screwing the country over.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
I don’t suppose we could arrange for all the Democrats in the Senate to dine at “Botulism in the Box” the night before?
“Criminal Records?” This joke tells itself.
Carolina Girl wrote:
That would be worth looking into. There’s always the “bad shell fish” way too…
True, he will not be impeached.
Obama impeached??
Hell no!!
This Congress is afraid to even criticize him…
@ RIX:
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Soetoro could get caught with kiddie porn red-handed and most of this congress wouldn’t vote to impeach.
No joke.
Bumr50 wrote:
BO is the OJ of DC.
unclassifiable wrote:
My money is on them skipping right over an appeal for an en banc District Court hearing and going straight to SCOTUS, probably on a rush basis to be heard this season.
@ Mike C.:
Er, “session”, not “season.”
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Or the Jim Harbaugh “I think I just ate bad shrimp” look.
would the feds squeeze private business to support their political agenda?…of course
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/01/25/rahm-goes-fascist-on-firearms/
@ Mike C.:
And actually, “term” would be better than “session.” CRS Syndrome strikes again…
@ Mike C.:
You and me both.
I wish I had CRS for the last 4+ years.
And then you couple it with CTS and CSS and it is a wonder I can even post an intelligble comment.
Bloomberg and Biden and Commies…oh my
Can we quit pretending that there’s a difference between the DNC and the CPUSA now?
And the Roe v. Wade celebration continues:
Calls to God for comment were not immediately returned.
//
@ Mike C.:
It was the DC Appeals court. That’s one level down.
@ lobo91:
Yep -- but I wouldn’t be surprised if they requested and got an “en banc hearing -- the liberal judge mobthink might not want to pass up that opportunity.
@ Carolina Girl:
I can’t see any way this gets overturned.
If it does, you may as well just toss the Constitution into the shredder. It means the president has unlimited power.
Just a drive-by. Judicial Watch has just put out a report that concludes the Benghazi fiasco was a direct result of systematic failures at the State Department.
Read the entire report here.
@ huckfunn:
“What difference does it make who’s responsible?
--Hillary Clinton
@ huckfunn:
How dare you suggest that Saint Hillary screwed up! She earned over 1 million frequent flyer miles!
//
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
If you want actual articles in the peer-reviewed journals I can give you those too, but I tried to give you something at your level of scientific sophistication. The consensus in the literature seems pretty solid that something developmental and biological is going on in these cases. But if you’re determined to believe it’s all a liberal plot to promote “immorality” I doubt anything could convince you.