On Saturday Afternoon, I had the privilege of using my fossil fuel burning snow removal beast to remove a full 8 inches of catastrophic global warming from my driveway. This allowed me to kill two birds with one stone. One, I was then able to leave and enter my garage with a motor vehicle. Two, and this one is the truly great thing that I did, I did my part, at least according to the lore of the most pernicious hoax every perpetrated against any society, to aid in warming up the place, meaning Planet Earth.
In the debate, which is not over by the way, as to whether the Earth is warming, and whether that warming is caused by the activity of man, including SUV’s, farting cows, air conditioning, industrialized activities, or utilizing any form of transportation that does not include walking, we have lost the fact somehow that prior periods of global warming in human history have been extremely beneficial to every inhabitant of our third rock from the sun. (I credit this reference to the Jimi Hendrix tune, and not the short lived sitcom, funny though, it may have been.)
I woke up Saturday to no less then a half dozen face book homages from my politically left of center friends to the great global warming hoax. Ban the Keystone XL pipeline, stop drinking water out of plastic bottles, (this one made me laugh, since plastic bottles were inflicted upon us all by the environazi crowd to begin with,) ban nuclear power, eat vegan since plants don’t fart carbon dioxide and methane, shut down the corporate farmer, who is more concerned with growing ample food to feed the world than the more enlightened concern that they should have, which is their carbon footprint. I noticed something about all of these posts, and it may just be coincidental. Each of the offending poster hailed from the beautiful climate experienced in either California, or Florida.
So, as I trudged out into the 5 degree temperature, to remove 8 inches of snow on Groundhog Day, cursing the rodent’s prediction of another 6 weeks of cold weather snow removal, I had another thought. I’m tired of being told by idiots, who really do not have the slightest clue as to anything actually related to science, any topic relating to anything having to do with economics, nor as to what the whether is like for anyone not living in California, what I should be hoping for in terms of wrecking our economy to combat a nonexistent problem. What it comes down to my fine leftist friends, living in climate paradise, is that if there is a choice between, (and realize that your vision of catastrophe is not one that I share,) my spending future winters in constant snow removal duty, or you having prettier bike paths to enjoy, I have one thing to say. Surf’s up!
The bulk of Robert Redford’s idiocy follows:
Real economic security is found in clean energy. That’s our future, not dirty energy that threatens us with ever worsening harm from climate change.
From rejecting the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline to limiting carbon pollution from our nation’s dirty power plants, President Barack Obama’s legacy will rest squarely on his response, resolve, and leadership in solving the climate crisis.
The Keystone XL tar sands pipeline would carry the dirtiest oil on the planet from Canada to America’s Gulf Coast’s refineries and ports, and then most of it likely exported overseas. It would promote one of the most damaging industrial practices ever devised, to coax low-grade crude oil from tar sands. We don’t need another pipeline for Canadian tar sands. It’s not in our national interest but is a profit scheme for big oil that needs to be rejected.
And in addition to the ability to say no to this dirty fuels project, the president has both the authority and the responsibility to limit the amount of industrial carbon pollution emitted from power plants. Taking this action will set the right course for reducing carbon pollution domestically and send the right signals that the U.S. is ready to lead globally. The Natural Resources Defense Council has laid out a common-sense plan that will cut carbon pollution; provide jobs to thousands of Americans; and save families real money in electricity bills.
It’s the 21st century. We’re not about to turn back now. Wind, solar, and other renewable power, now that, to me, is the future. It’s clean energy that will produce new and plentiful jobs for generations to come without the disastrous effects of tar sands and carbon-belching power plants.
Robert Redford is an actor, and a fine one at that. His expertise ends there, and that is where he should limit himself in terms of lecturing the rest of us. Redford of course has no degree in anything at all related to the field of scientific endeavor. As a matter of fact, he never actually bothered with graduating from college, where he took zero classes in the fields of mathematics or science. He also eschewed any actual study in the science of Economics, which is another pillar of his belief system. So, while about two dozen nations who followed this path to oblivion have already proven that the green economy leads to higher electricity prices, power outages, and famine, fear not, Robert Redford and his complete lack of any real knowledge is here to tell us what to do.
The truly inspirational thing to remember here, is that his life will not be impacted in the slightest with the consequences of continuing along this self destructive path. Such is the joy of liberalism. Others, who are exempted from the actual consequences of their stupidity, are able to convince many who reside in that land called reality, that they care about us all. Robert you see travels in private jets, drives the biggest cars, lives in a mansion that uses 20 to 30 times the electricity as we mere mortals, and smugly tells the rest of us that we must take the actions necessary to save the planet. While the rest of us live with the hardships inflicted by liberal policies, Robert will continue his current lifestyle, completely unchanged, totally oblivious to the very real consequences of his belief system. Consequences you see are for the little people to enjoy, and never for the liberal elite who’s guidance we followed.
It’s been over a year since I linked to this video, but just in case anyone is interested, here is the best argument against catastrophic global warming alarmism on the web. It’s an hour and a half, and well worth your time. Be forewarned, the video contains actual science, and if you are not in the mood for that sort of wonkishness, you may find it boring. I will say however that Warren Meyer does as good a job at explaining things to the lay person as it is possible to do.
Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.
Robert Redford knows as much about the complex dynamics of our environment as Foster knows about evolution or dieting.
Well, climate sensitivity to CO2 is taking a huge hit in recent peer-reviewed studies. Oops. The greenie-weenies had their shot and they blew it. Now the public has other things to worry about and their models have had their legs cut out from under them by an increasing number of studies that show they’re bullshit.
@ Mike C.:
Hence the worms. You are responsible for the worms
@ waldensianspirit:
When will the stupidity end. Uh…before major urbanization where large chunks of the earth were covered there had to be more worms than there are today.
@ waldensianspirit:
I’ve waited decades to see this spoof tune become pertinent. Thank You!
@ waldensianspirit:
Read that over at WUWT. Heh.
@ Flyovercountry:
What do buds have to do with worms? Still…funny lyrics.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
I have a better one than that. The weather prediction for me the other day was *delightful*. Really? Oh indeedy it was in the paper.
/no I’m not kidding…then I had my husband all that day say well is your day delightful…hell if I know look outside does it look delightful to you?
I wonder if the next rainy cold day they will print…colder than a witches t*t?
@ Lily:
Tomorrows forecast for here is Neato/
@ song_and_dance_man:
This particular spoof predates youtube by a good amount of time. I couldn’t find a version other than the one I played, and I did look. Other than that, I can remember being among a group truly pissed at the entire stupidity of the we-are-the-world-crowd, believing that meeting along High Street in my particular town and holding hands was going to accomplish anything other selling records for Quincy Jones and his long suffering pocket book. That’s when this tune started being played on the radio, way back in either 1984 or 1985. I thought it was Wierd Al, but I may be mistaken.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
because you would have to be stoned to come up with that I guess…
@ song_and_dance_man:
I’ll be darn you could be a meteorologist!!!! You have what it takes!
/just look outside and report what you see with different words!
Al Gore claims in “An Inconvenient Truth” that a polar bear drowned tying
to swim 60 miles to solid ice, all due to AGW.
How would anybody know that? Did the bear make his final cell phone
call, “I’m not gonna make it. I’m goin down,glug, glug, glug.”
@ RIX:
Very good question *how the hell did he know?* Fairy tales and bad ones at that too. Al Gore needs to go have a delightful day somewhere out of the public’s eye forever.
RIX wrote:
here, hold my seal…
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/4/book-polar-bear-population-rise/
brookly red wrote:
Darn…I thought stoned with rocks there at first! What a dummy I am today….or am I stoned? I did eat a couple of cookies. I don’t know… it’s kinda like waiting for a stop sign to turn green. Takes forever.
////
just kidding!
Although OT I’ll repost this here b’cause I think I have point in this:
More and more O. reminds me of the plebeian tribunes of the late Roman republic like Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus and his brother Gaius or Lucius Appuleius Saturninus and Marcus Livius Drusus. They all tried to circumvent the Senate by populism and a “popular vote” to reach their goals to alter the republic.
Obama to Visit Israel This Spring, White House Announces
(NYT)
Guggi wrote:
I think it will first have to happen first before anyone believes it.
/I’m sure something will come up to prevent it…
Guggi wrote:
Phooey.
@ Lily:
@ buzzsawmonkey:
He’s working for the midterm election.
<Lily wrote:
see I told you bad things would happen when the word got out they had oil…
@ Guggi:
Already? Makes sense though.
/either way I don’t trust him.
No Assault Weapons Ban in the Senate. It looks like their real push is going to be Universal Background Checks. That might make it through theHouse, but I doubt it. The only way to enforce Universal Background Checks is through Universal Registration, and that raises a Big Red Flag. Gangbangers, of course, will ignore all of this while running up another record-breaking season in Chicago, home of the strictest gun control in the country.
@ Flyovercountry:
Most of the time these endeavors are really about celebrities and artists to show they care. Sure the proceeds go to charities, but what happened after Band Aid, Live Aid, We Are the World and Don’t They Know it’s Christmas Time. I know what’s his name from the Boomtown Rats that put on Live Aid keep it going for a while. And people like Bono going about showcasing their ignorance. The one that is still going strong is Farm Aid. At least this one helps American farmers.
Guggi wrote:
Jerusalem
—apologies to William Blake and “Jerusalem”
And did those feet, ere election
Once walk before the Western Wall?
And did the president-to-be
E’en then plan Netanyahu’s fall?
Did his anti-colonial mind
Then clench the fist of his left hand
And dream Jerusalem held entire
By murderous Palestinians?
“Bring me my club of foreign aid!
“Bring appeasement to the UN!
“Bring a blind eye now to al-Qaed’!
“Bring the old borders up again!
“I will not cease to temporize
“Nor oppose nuclear Iran
“Till Arabs wrest Jerusalem
“From Israel’s devastated land.”
brookly red wrote:
No joke there. I wonder if Israel will be busy that week? Like just can’t fit you in….but hey call we’ll do lunch in the fall.
@ Lily:
It is never too soon to start campaigning. Obama started campaigning for his second term before he was even in office. He wants to get the House back, something Bill Clinton was never able to do. God help us if he does, because the Democrats will be in a vengeful mood.
@ Iron Fist:
Always said that Feinstein’s bill was the sacrifice/stalking horse for the real, incremental nastiness.
I’m reposting this here on the live thread to see if anyone can help explain it.
Lily wrote:
they will probably invite the Dali Lama for that week…
Flyovercountry wrote:
Did you hear it on the Dr. Demento show? That was where I first heard Weird Al. Oh and BTW I looked it up. We are The Worms is by some dude named Ken Johnson.
Guggi wrote:
Will be be wearing a bomb vest?
@ Iron Fist:
You are right. It seems like that is all he does and yes God help us if he gets what he wants.
Pentagon to extend certain benefits to same-sex spouses
Lily wrote:
Why? I could be the next Al Roker.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Still gloating about obama’s win? Or they haven’t found another republican to complain about yet? Or haven’t realized the election is over and obama won?
/I’d bank money on the third one.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Yeah, it never had a chance of passing the Senate. They want the Universal Background Check as step towards gun registration. They know the gangbangers and assorted criminals will ignore it, just as they ignore the laws in Chicago. Gun control is not and has never been about crime control. It has always been about restricting the freedom of the law-abiding. It was when it was the KKK persuing it in the post-Civil War South, it was when FDR persued it, it was when Johnson signed the ’68 GCA, and so forth. That is why all of it must be opposed.
Guggi wrote:
Probably to meet with Hamas.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
So true !!!
Urban Infidel wrote:
Could it be Mooch or Cackle?
song_and_dance_man wrote:
Indeed….all you need to do is get your thesaurus out and away you go making the big bucks. Today’s forecast will be delightfully lovely!
(Whatever that means.)
Lily wrote:
Or? Are they now going to actually start blaming things on a candidate who lost?
brookly red wrote:
Oh that is indeed a good one. LOL!
song_and_dance_man wrote:
wouldn’t it be easier to have them over to the whitehouse, again?
Lily wrote:
Camp David, golf or a vacation.
Guggi wrote:
How will we ever undo this?
We’re done.
@ song_and_dance_man:
..or the PIJ which has good ties to the MB in Egypt.
@ Iron Fist:
What is infuriating is once again the Right is allowing the Left to frame the debate. The 2nd Amendment was never about hunting or sport.
@ Urban Infidel:
devastating, isn’t it ?
Urban Infidel wrote:
Why yes! By George I think you honestly nailed it!!!
/wish I would have thought of that.
Urban Infidel wrote:
That is kind of the point. Obama’s fundamental transformation of America into something quite un-American is ongoing.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
An expensive golf vacation with his wife going to a different place so the extra plane and security. obama isn’t vacationing or happy if he isn’t spending our tax dollars on his entertainment.
Urban Infidel wrote:
It’s insane to be honest and how do you fix insane? I honestly don’t know.
Iron Fist wrote:
The Trolls in DC Town have had no problems living with several tens of million of undocumented aliens lose in the Country. They will just have to get use to living with several tens of million undocumented of Gun Owners that have been living here longer.
@ Urban Infidel:
…because he doesn’t like pot smokers on his part of the beach ?
Lily wrote:
nothing is worse than a commie with expensive tastes…
Iron Fist wrote:
When he meant change he meant change…but not the kind we will like.
It’s just crazy …and it just keeps getting worse.
@ Guggi:
(Source )
@ song_and_dance_man:
No, it was not, and the Supreme Court has even said that. It will be very interesting to see what the current court does with some of this legislation once it winds its way there. I read earlier today where they’ve already filed the papers to give a Notice of Intent to Sue to New York State over their new gun control laws. I hope the Appellate court slaps them with an injunction sometime this summer (the State has 90 days to respond). The Supreme Court has found that the Second Amendment is about Self-Defense, and who is some nameless legislator to tell me what I need for self-defense in my own home? Frankly, that goes for machineguns and suppressors, too, and most especially short-barreled rifles and shotguns.
brookly red wrote:
Isn’t that the truth and expensive is his middle name! Now if 1/2 of American people will wake up to it! The other 1/2 that is.
Iron Fist wrote:
say what?
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Yes we are simply undocumented gun owners, and that is the way it should stay. Nt illegal gun owners, mind you, but undocumented.
Iron Fist wrote:
More than un-American, unearthly, alien, hostile to reason.
Guggi wrote:
Can’t wait until the first transgender soldier puts in for maternity leave.
Seriously, though, despite my general unease where this is concerned, if one accepts the concept of domestic partnership laws then this cannot be avoided.
That is, however, why the line must be drawn between the term “domestic partnership” for same-sex couples and “marriage” for traditional couples. Permitting “marriage” between members of the same sex—creating a new form of marriage—plays havoc with too many aspects of the legal system and the Constitution. No matter how often or how loudly you call a tail a leg, a dog still only has four legs.
Of course, what I think is beside the point; if/when the First DA/DT Justice writes the Supreme Court’s opinion this Spring, the First Amendment and the Tenth Amendment are done, and same-sex marriage will be a “civil right” forced on all fifty states.
Lily wrote:
no it’s Hussein and don’t ever forget that…
Urban Infidel wrote:
France?
In case any of you have not seen this. Ted Nugent female-dog slaps Morgan.
Iron Fist wrote:
talk about a path to citizenship
Iron Fist wrote:
Or, “gun owners out of status,” as John Conyers might say…
Guggi wrote:
I did run across that story when I was searching around before posting. Never heard of it before today. That’s probably it, but seriously, Romney is so irrelevant right now, why would they bother wasting the chalk on a message like that?
Lily wrote:
It was either the second or third debate that Obama said, “it’s about time that
Governor Romney took responsibility”
Like Romney was President for the last four years.
Urban Infidel wrote:
If they’re legal spouses, why shouldn’t they get benefits? Your barking up the wrong tree here…
@ brookly red:
Empire State gun owners sue to block state’s gun ban. It has to go through the courts, but I don’t see how this passes even a reasonable standard test. 7 round magazines? That is an unreasonable and arbitrary number. And thus unconstitutional, even if they decline to give the Second Amendment the strict scrutiney test that it deserves.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
His mouth needs to be registered.
@ Iron Fist:
Ask a leftist if they know what the 2nd Amendment really means…they don’t know. They repeat the stupid talking points of the media and the obama administration…the 2nd Amendment needs changing to them because when it was written the gun of the hour was muskets. Then they go on to repeat the lie that if it saves only one childs life they are willing to give up their right to the 2nd amendment. Whoaaaaa! I refuse to give up any RIGHT and they should too! Then I ask them again to tell me what the 2nd Amendment really means…the other answer I get besides the one up above is *I’m not stupid*…oh yeah you are if you can’t tell me what the 2nd Amendment really means.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
After transgenderism BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder) will be the next “civil right”. They are working on it and you can’t prevent it if you allow vaginoplasty and phalloplasty because of “identity”.
Urban Infidel wrote:
I’d add evil to that mix too.
Iron Fist wrote:
I’ve been undocumented for many years, I’m not stupid enough to tell the Government about what I have now. What I own is nobody’s business but my own.
Letting the Government know what I have is also the main reason I’ve passed on getting a CCW permit. Letting then know about even one gun is one too many…
Mike C. wrote:
I think so too, it’s a small thing pretty easily ignored
Iron Fist wrote:
unreasonable and arbitrary… that could spill over into NYC which as you know has different laws than the state as a whole.
@ song_and_dance_man:
Again, Piers asked “why somebody needs” a gun. “Need” is the issue—because the point is that Morgan, Obama, and all the rest of the gun-grabbers are grabbing for the right to determine what they think other people need. They have not the slightest right to do this—and everybody should be asking these “need” people where the hell they get off taking unto themselves the right to determine whatever they think I “need”?
In case you missed it: “Reason Not the Need.”
RIX wrote:
As if obama has ever taken responsibilty!!!! It really is insane!!!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I would have asked him why does anybody need a locked door?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
very frustrating when gun owners get sucked into the ‘needs’ or ‘hunting’ issues…whey give them an irrelevant plank to attack you from?
@ song_and_dance_man:
Thanks for posting. I missed that. Piers should be at msnbc.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Oh indeed! Because they go even farther with *what you need* than just guns. I don’t need anyone telling me how to live. Period.
We “need” our guns as a counter to all the failed liberal policies of of the last 100 years.
each according to their ‘needs’
“Need” is so subjective it’s perfect for the progressives.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Right. Just like almost every policy the Left advances it’s about their need for control.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Oh the *need* issue it’s more than guns…how much food you *need* how much gas you *need* how much electricity you *need*….this is a very dangerous path in my opinion. We don’t need the government telling us how much or what we *need*. Slippery slope.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
ironic coming from a brit…
heysoos wrote:
I’m really a kind and generous person and more than willing to donate lead to any liberal that comes looking for some…
Lily wrote:
ahem… how much healthcare you need.
Lily wrote:
Exactly what I discuss in the essay I linked to.
Who would have seen that coming?/
@ brookly red:
Darn forgot that..but yeah..the list is end-less!!!
RIX wrote:
it is actually twice that number when you figure in the people that will lose their job and thus their healthcare…
RIX wrote:
People who had their eyes wide open and weren’t wearing pink sunglasses.
brookly red wrote:
Or do you really “need” to lice long enough to see your great grand kids…
Once started there’s no end…
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Not sure about your state, but in KY when I got my CCW permit, I didn’t register or declare any gun! Did the training, applied, got permit!
Who really needs anything? Abstract it out for him. Need is just a group of people expressing a desire. If gun owners have a need for a gun and view the government as the reason they need it. Then less government is the obvious solution is gun control is that important to someone. Remove a lot of Federal activities and transform then into state and local regs.
Who “needs” CNN and why? The internet does a better job of entertaining and informing. Let’s register TV sets and connections so we can regulate CNN more.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
It also opens up the entire universe of straw men, and changes the entirety of the debate to eliminate the actual reason for the inclusion of the Second Amendment in the first place. I keep waiting for someone to take Morgan to task for this, but it never happens.
The Second Amendment was never about hunting, target shooting, skeet shooting, home protection, collection, needing, or anything even related to those topics. The Second Amendment is about putting fear into the minds of those people who run our government and to serve as a constant reminder that the people only need put up with as much tyranny as they really want to.
The right to bear arms is inherently given me by my creator simply because I draw breath, and what my needs are or are not simply does not factor into that equation. That is something that as a citizen of a foreign nation, Piers either is incapable of, or unwilling to understand.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
When I saw the need wording in your post…that is straight were my mind went…need to read your post. But being around enough lefties I know exactly what it says.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
lice == live.
damn keyboard, I hates it.
Anyone who claims the power to tell you what you “need” is demanding the power to let you have only what he thinks you “deserve.”
hipster — needy hysterical lib.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
pssst I will trade you a can of Spam for 2 rolls of toilet paper…
Iron Fist wrote:
Not really Obama’s fundamental transformation, though he is trying to lay claim to it.
@ heysoos:
Yeah, all you need is a cot in a shack, a thin blanket, and a potato. See how good the State is to you?
I’d tell Cuomo that I want as many weapons to secure my safety in the same way that you want a $200 haircut to secure your vanity
@ Tanker:
Did you have to get a pic I.D. and get finger printed?
@ Flyovercountry:
Exactly. Read my essay at the link; you’ll like it.
darkwords wrote:
You are forgetting something…we most certainly need food. We need water. We need fuel. We need electricity. We need doctors. We need medicience. This is were the *need* grabbers are going to hit us. Make no mistake about it. Not TV’s and stuff like that. Already they are going for the guns which will prevent them for going after what we really need and it isn’t TV.
Tanker wrote:
I live in a major very blue city that already requires hand gun registration, both to own and to buy. I’ve been in violation of those laws for many years now, and I don’t see things getting better anytime soon. In fact the State want to out do New York with its new gun law bills.
@ Lily:
Both, I am sure. They aren’t registering guns with carry permits. They are registering gun owners. That is why more states need to adopt Arizona’s Constitutional Carry provision. There are a couple of cases in the pipeline right now to determine if the Second Amendment applies outside your home. It’ll be interesting to see what the Court does with that.
Lily wrote:
Don’t be silly Lily, you don’t need any of those things… Unless you are a party member in good standing… Comrade…
Deficits will fall to less than $1 trillion in 2013, CBO reports
THE BILL OF NEEDS
1st Amendment -- No one NEEDS freedom of religion.
2nd Amendment -- No one NEEDS magazines greater than 10 rounds in capacity or a semi-auto rifle.
3rd Amendment -- No one NEEDS all the space in their house or apartment. If the federal government can’t pass a budget, citizens must house and feed active soldiers for free.
4th Amendment -- No one NEEDS warrants or privacy.
5th Amendment -- No one NEEDS due process.
6th Amendment -- No one NEEDS a speedy trial. They’ll get to it when they get to it.
7th Amendment -- No one NEEDS a jury trial. Judges Judy, Joe Brown, and Mathis can handle the additional work load. Because bribery is rare, all arguments can be straightened out behind closed doors.
8th Amendment -- No one NEEDS reasonable fines.
9th Amendment -- No one NEEDS anything more than what is described above.
10th Amendment -- No one NEEDS states. The federal government is able to manage state affairs from DC.
@ Guggi:
That is if Sequestration takes effect. Obama is already trying to stop that, so these numbers are so much piss and wind.
@ Iron Fist:
So that is what my husband had to do finger prints and photo I.D. and more for CCW. Never thought of what you just said…not the gun they are registering but the owners…see doesn’t matter what gun they have only that there is guns in this persons home.
darkwords wrote:
There are many real “needs” (i.e. air, water, food) the list is not long. What you are describing are “wants” thing that a person can live without. Liberals are great at claiming “need” when it’s really something they “want”. And of course they always “want” someone else to “give” it to them without charge.
@ doriangrey:
Just a potato huh? LOL!
/dear heavens what is it coming to? Thank the Lord I had my by-pass surgery before all this kicked in…because they would just let me die I do believe because I’m over 50.
@ doriangrey:
I’ll see you both at the reedukation kamp!
@ song_and_dance_man:
Even more examples…mine were only the basic needs.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
You’re not a fellow denzian of Owe-mally’s magic wonderland are you?
Flyovercountry wrote:
With just a potato too.
Darn did it again…the thread went dead.
/at least I do it right.
citizen_q wrote:
I’m in the ‘Land of 10,000 Sky Blue Kool-Aid drinkers’.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Sounds not delightful.
Lily wrote:
see you don’t *need* a gun… if someone breaks into your house you can just send him an e-mail
England might actually need some guns at this point.
Muslim patrols in London.
Lily wrote:
I do have a very nice view of the Mississippi river from my front steps.
@ brookly red:
When seconds count, the police are minutes away
It’s just wonderful what obama has done!
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/05/new-cbo-report-predicts-7-million-americans-will-lose-their-employer-based-healthcare-because-of-obamacare/
for some reason the NYT needs to know who’s packing…maybe some dope should ask them why, just for the recor
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/court-nytimess-request-new-york-city-gun-owners-violates-law_700264.html
@ Urban Infidel:
They could not do that here.
Lily wrote:
Picture Id and finger printed. I’ve had so many military clearances it didn’t matter though. They have my prints and DNA on file!
brookly red wrote:
Oh hell yes! That would get rid of the booger for sure!
/you know you aren’t that far off base on this.
Can I post you a song????? LOL!
heysoos wrote:
ahem… http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/02/04/flash-mob-mayhem-violent-groups-of-teens-leave-nyc-neighborhoods-in-disarray/
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
MN correct? MIN?
Lily wrote:
I never accept songs from married women…
song_and_dance_man wrote:
I can see urban liberals okay with it, same mentality
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Gotcha!
Tanker wrote:
/he said in a MAJOR city…
@ Urban Infidel:
WTH???? People put up with this???? What happens when some Christian and Jewish patrols happen???? Hmmmmmm?
/I don’t understand why they put up with this or why they don’t do something about it.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Well at least you have a good view!!!
brookly red wrote:
flash mobs in NYC are under official media blackout…disregard this story…or else
heysoos wrote:
How so?
Lily wrote:
Because Europe has self-castrated with a dull knife.
@ Tanker:
Sounds like what my husband is going through to get his CCW.
@ Tanker:
Y
Urban Infidel wrote:
needs…we’ve been discussing how a few impose their will on you
The Left won’t be satisfied until America is one big Gitmo.
@ Urban Infidel:
Wasn’t “Defender of the faith” one of the titles given to the British monarchy?
Paging Prince Charles! /
brookly red wrote:
Oh my word!!!!! LOL! You never know what I was going to post.
Urban Infidel wrote:
we should start a charity to send them guns…
“for just pennies a day you can arm Tommy”
brookly red wrote:
Yep and see it worked…I don’t need a gun…the printed word works for me. LOL!
Lily wrote:
yes I did and I am too fast for that
@ brookly red:
None of it matters much to me. DHS labeled me a potential thread because of being a retired vet. Might as well let them know I’m not rolling over! If my CCW gives them pause all good, if it doesn’t oh well, we will see!
brookly red wrote:
NYC needs Rudy back.
Urban Infidel wrote:
Indeed they have. Good grief!!! No wonder they have so many problems…yet hey we are horrible!!! Hypocrites. No back-bone at all.
citizen_q wrote:
Now it’s the Muslim faith.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
FREE THE BIG GULP!!!
song_and_dance_man wrote:
well now that bloomy repealed term limits we can have him back…
Lily wrote:
The first real sign that winter is over is when the first towboat makes it to town.
@ brookly red:
/could have been “I wouldn’t want to be like you” or “lunatic fringe”
Tanker wrote:
indeed.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
last fall I crossed the Missouri at KC and the Mississippi at St Louis…both rivers were in terrible shape….in all my days I’ve never seen anything like it….miles of mud
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
meanwhile I am waiting to see the first mini skirt on Madison ave…
@ brookly red:
I’m labeled a threat, they wish I was just a thread!
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Yep! Gator end of the Mississippi here…but I don’t have the view I’d have to drive 3 hours to see the Mississippi …it is a pretty river though!
heysoos wrote:
It’s just a direct form of comrade zero’s redistribution.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Would you mind if I linked to your essay in a blog post on my site, giving you full credit of course?
By the way, Mao wrote in his Little Red Book, “Every Communist must grasp the truth. Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
OK—let’s posit, for the sake of argument, that Obama himself is not a Communist. Just because his father was a Communist; just because his mother was a Communist; just because his political mentor, Bill Ayers, was an avowed Maoist; just because his childhood mentor was card-carrying Communist Frank Marshall Davis; just because he admits in his books that he sought out the radical Marxists in college; just because he appointed open Mao admirer Anita Dunn and avowed Communist Van Jones to positions in his Administration; just because his manager David Axelrod is a red diaper baby; just because his and his wife’s most trusted adviser is Valerie Jarrett, whose father-in-law Vernon Jarrett was also a well-known Communist; just because of all these things, there is no reason to believe Obama himself is a Communist.
Nonetheless, there is that dictum by Mao Zedong. And there is the evidence before us that Barack Obama is interested in gaining, not in sharing, power. And there is the evidence that he wants to go after gun ownership—and not just any gun ownership, but legal gun ownership of that segment of the population least sympathetic to him.
So…if “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun,” and Obama wants to take away the guns of the people he likes least and who like him least, what could that possibly say about Obama’s desires for political power?
Flyovercountry wrote:
Not at all.
@ Tanker:
ignore the feds…if you get a letter, toss it away…get a call, hang up…don’t give in an inch
beer run… back in 10
Anyone remember Tony Martin of the UK? He killed a burglar in his home and was convicted of murder. He was denied parole because he was ” a danger to burglars.” He used a weapon that he had no license for.
heysoos wrote:
Not part of my nature. best defense is the strongest offense. Too bad our military leaders (spit) don’t grasp that truth!
Lily wrote:
I’m up top of the bluff here, about a quarter of a mile from the river.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
To turn the United States into a communist country period. You have made your case completely. Guilty as charged.
BatGuano wrote:
A danger to criminals? A burglar is a criminal isn’t he? The UK brings new meaning to stupid and honey you just can’t fix stupid.
BatGuano wrote:
Sure do. All part of the greater plan to make all forms of self-defense illegal.
Tanker wrote:
my life is such that I post with more bravado than the typical guy…I have no home, no job or income, no debt and I own nothing but a car and a truck…easy for me to sat I guess, but if bad mojo comes my way I’m ready…I’m past 60yrs and I’m not doing hard time because I defy the govt, who in fact made me a felon and their enemy….fuck that
@ Lily:
That’s right. We do not need to look to the UK for guidance on gun control (Piers Morgan).
@ BatGuano:
Indeed. The UK should rather look to us as a pillar of freedom, something that they are in ever-increasing need of.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
An armed citizenry has an unfair advantage over unsuspecting criminals.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Sounds like you have a lovely view! Around Baton Rouge along River Road the Mississippi is a pretty lady of a River with all the Oaks and old homes. Awesome. But I’m not near there. Nice place to visit. I am further south and I don’t have to go far to see me some gators though or blue crabs or water moccasin (cotton mouth) snake or snapping turtles….just a few miles down the road about 30 or 40…been on the rivers and such a lot when I was younger. Love the smell of pine and the rivers.
@ heysoos:
No home??? You have talked about your house.
@ Flyovercountry:
Nice ganja!!
Lily wrote:
I don’t own it….poor wordage
@ heysoos:
Oh…was hoping you weren’t homeless there.
@ Lily:
They ruled that he was a danger to the public, since burglars are part of the public.
@ Iron Fist:
There are some states where your carry permit is only good for a specific gun. They put the serial number on the permit and everything.
If you get a new one, you have to go and take the test again.
@ heysoos:
Just for you…and your house…and because speaking of houses reminded me of this song.
Lily wrote:
no, I didn’t mean to imply that…I live in the back house of a two house property, my bunkhouse…the owner lives here a bit but mostly up in NYC…he’s a well known artist and has some money…he utterly insists that I pay nothing, just watch the place and keep track of maintenance…it’s a sweet deal for me, I got very very lucky
lobo91 wrote:
well they should be part of the general population…
@ Iron Fist:
They should know about the importance of armed citizens protecting their freedom.There was an incident in 1775 ( I forgot what happened…)
lobo91 wrote:
lobo that makes it even more stupid to be honest! I have noticed they go easy on very dangerous criminals across the pond.
@ Lily:
what a great record…loved those guys
lobo91 wrote:
A Policeman’s Lot
—WS Gilbert, “The Pirates of Penzance”
When a felon’s not engaged in his employment,
Or maturing his felonious little plans,
His capacity for innocent enjoyment
Is just as great as any honest man’s.
Our feelings we with difficulty smother
When constabulary duty’s to be done:
Ah, take one consideration with another,
A policeman’s lot is not a happy one!
Oooh, when constabulary duty’s to be done, to be done
A policeman’s lot is not a happy one (happy one)
When the enterprising burglar isn’t burgling,
When the cut-throat isn’t occupied in crime,
He loves to hear the little brook a-gurgling,
And listen to the merry village chime.
When the coster’s finished jumping on his mother,
He loves to lie a-basking in the sun:
Ah, take one consideration with another,
The policeman’s lot is not a happy one!
Oooh, when constabulary duty’s to be done, to be done
A policeman’s lot is not a happy one (happy one)
@ heysoos:
My goodness you do have a sweet deal going on there. Lucky you!
heysoos wrote:
sweet…
now have some appreciation us NYC types
@ heysoos:
Glad you liked it!
@ brookly red:
Oh your song by Red Rider…because red is in your nic!
@ lobo91:
I looked for a link to the original and couldn’t find it. It was a danger to the public and not burglars?
@ Lily:
I just needed to explain my situation…the feds know where I am, I have one bank account in my name here in ABQ…my ‘wealth’ is scattered around and not really tracable on the surface…I’m trying to get the feds to ignore me while I return the favor…so far I’m getting my way but typical folks with jobs and families and records cannot do it and I respect that….I’m sort of a renegade, a pirate…I’ll fight the feds tooth and nail when it comes to my privacy, my habits, my money
BatGuano wrote:
Let the criminals apply for workman’s comp, if they survive.
Don’t understand why people can;t understand that taking stuff that doesn’t belong to you is an inherently dangerous proposition.
Why are leftists side with the criminals? Professional courtesy?
Lily wrote:
I always confuse them with Badd Company for some reason…
@ Lily:
How appropriate! The song was about rising ant-semitism.
@ BatGuano:
I think it meant that burglars are part of the population that he was a dangerous to the burglars in the population basically.
BatGuano wrote:
G. Washington won the coin toss and the Redcoats had to play target…
@ brookly red:
Bad Company one of my favs…I have a lot of favorites though!
citizen_q wrote:
yes till someone takes their shit… then they get all conservative.
@ BatGuano:
Glad you liked it!
@ citizen_q:
“Professional courtesy” is classic! Wish I had thought of that. Yes that about sums it up.
brookly red wrote:
MSNBC host Chris Hayes gets upset when his wealth, in the form of his bike, gets “redistributed.”
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
I if they had put on green coats they might have won…
Lily wrote:
Yup
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
comments are pretty funny
@ BatGuano:
Thanks! Think of me when you use it.
@ heysoos:
Don’t blame you….always have a back-up plan. My husband does.
Lily wrote:
Mine involves more ammunition…
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
every morning when I go for coffee I see some hipster standing by the frame of their bike locked to the signpost wondering where the seat, wheels and handlebar went…
@ citizen_q:
Indeed.
lobo91 wrote:
I’m static, not going anywhere…they will simply over run me
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Bright red coats in combat? What morons would do that?
heysoos wrote:
/when they finally come for you it will be for not filling out that census form…
BatGuano wrote:
at least after the first battle
@ brookly red:
Oh indeed…….knock upside the head by a clue-bat they are after that.
@ brookly red:
You’d think.
lobo91 wrote:
Yep there’s that one too!
brookly red wrote:
during WW1 the Brits would halt a furious advance to have tea…blew the American troops away
ms tfk tells me she heard on her grape vine that the liberals have their collective panties all wadded up because the Ravens road in their victory prade in Humvees driven by Army guys in camo.
oh, no….. no….. what to do,,,, did they have GUNs on themmm
piss their pants now
Lily wrote:
I still say the colonists were the original guerrillas
BatGuano wrote:
In the days when armies met face to face, before trenches became the thing, it was not so crazy as you might think. Have you ever seen Zulu, or Khartoum—films which show this kind of battle in the 19th century?
The British used a volley-by-ranks form of fire, where by firing single-shot weapons in massed volleys by front rank altering with rear rank, they sent a withering wall of bullets against enemies who counted it a mark of their own bravery to meet their adversaries face to face. Vast numbers of people were mown down in these exchanges.
taxfreekiller wrote:
just tell them they were GAY army guys, and they will feel better.
heysoos wrote:
Yep and that’s why they kept pleading for our help…..and the Red Coats well that is why they lost…at least we had the good sense not to wear red in green areas….and that’s why we are like Curr dogs…
Ground Zero imam accused of plundering funds to finance lavish lifestyle.
brookly red wrote:
They were!!!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
and they also used swarm attacks on German machine gun positions… not the smartest people. Brave yes, smart no.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I kinda think we all saw that one coming.
brookly red wrote:
the Jamaican Maroons fought the Brits to a draw with clubs and spears…the were undefeated, decades before the Revolutionary war…a remarkable story, and to this day the two Maroon tribes involved still live autonomously from the Jamaican govt
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Oh my!!!!! Who would have thunk it????????
/some things just are meant to be.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
extradite him to Malaysia… see how he like islamic justice
“A is for Activist”: new book for indoctrinating pre-schoolers into left-think.
brookly red wrote:
2d Marines at Belleau Wood…Marines stormed the woods with no French backup (what?…we’re here to kill Germans, not sit on our ass)…they got up into the dense forest, ran out of ammo, went to bayonets and the rest is history…the Germans were utterly terrified of the Marines, expert shots and a lust for stabbing, slashing and pounding, the Devil Dogs…the war ended a few months after that
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
P is for Purge
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I have seen both movies. At Cowpens, Captain Morgan instructed his militia to stand their ground and give him two fires and then run away. The British rushed into the breach and were met with the regulars fire who were concealed beneath a low hill.The continentals prevailed that day because of concealment.Later, it was used by the Duke of Wellington at Waterloo.
@ heysoos:
Just for you…..
@ buzzsawmonkey:
That was pretty much the only effective tactic available to them, given the limits of the technology. They were using not only single-shot muzzleloaders, but smoothbores at that. Being able to hit a man-sized target at a range beyond about 50 yards would have been luck.
@ brookly red:
Concur.
Lily wrote:
Right now, I’m trying to find a scope for one of my rifles. Nobody seems to have the one I want in stock, at least at a reasonable price.
@ Lily:
Semper Fi baby
lobo91 wrote:
have you tried e-bay?
@ heysoos:
Oh yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
…used millions of dollars in donations to fund a lavish lifestyle of travel and cars, a bombshell lawsuit charges.
Uh…hmmm
@ brookly red:
Yup
It’s a fairly new model from Nikon. I think they’ve been overwhelmed by the demand.
@ lobo91:
It was actually an update of Alexander the Great’s “phalanx” tactic.
lobo91 wrote:
e-bay not kidding http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_ipg=50&_sop=1&_from=R7&_sofindtype=0&_armrs=1&_nkw=telescopic+sights&_sacat=0&_lncat=0&_arm=1&_armm=94&_ruu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2FEverything-Else-%2F99%2Fi.html%3F_ipg%3D50%26_sop%3D1%26_from%3DR7%26_sofindtype%3D0%26_armrs%3D1%26_nkw%3Dtelescopic%2Bsights%26_arr%3D1&_armi=Everything+Else
lobo91 wrote:
OK disregard my last… have you tried going direct to Nikon?
lobo91 wrote:
Maybe scroll all over the internet….you never know sometimes it takes me a few hours to find excatly what I’m looking for …but it’s there and good luck too!
BatGuano wrote:
The red coats go all the way back to Oliver Cromwell’s new model army. Red was the cheapest dye at the time so that is what they used for the new uniforms.
@ brookly red:
I checked there already. Nobody has the exact model I’m looking for at the moment. Someone has a similar one, but it has a different reticle than what I want.
This is the one I’m looking for
Lily wrote:
also check estate sales… you never know
@ Lily:
makes my blood run hot…my dear old dad was 2d Marines…he went to his grave with Japanese iron stuck inside him
BTW, I retired my LGF sock puppet effective immediately. I just logged in to LGF to see if I still have an account and I do. My last time there was election day and I haven’t been there since. My nic was EdDantes.There are a few good folks there but I wont name them because of possible repercussions.
@ brookly red:
I have. Doesn’t look like their site is set up for retail sales.
That particular item has an export restriction on it, so that might complicate things.
lobo91 wrote:
what model ?
lobo91 wrote:
a .308 Lapua?…what rifle?
BatGuano wrote:
I still have one there, but I’ve forgotten the password.
@ brookly red:
There’s a link to it in 267 above
waldensianspirit wrote:
Mmmmm! Bait!
@ song_and_dance_man:
Don’t bother. Chuck is hopeless.
@ heysoos:
.308 Winchester (7.62x51 NATO)
It’s for a Springfield Armory M1A
@ lobo91:
Ooh! Nice rifle!
heysoos wrote:
To all the military men and women ….past and present…
THANK-YOU!
and to your dad too.
got a 4 16x 50 for $179
BatGuano wrote:
His brain went to mush. Blahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
@ song_and_dance_man:
EdDantes made the Diary of Daedelus at least twice. One was a misunderstanding of my post the other was election night when my post was fully understood.
@ brookly red:
Or check Pawn Shops!
Never know.
Lily wrote:
Cheetos dust blowing around in an empty cavity…
@ brookly red:
This particular scope is made specifically for long-range shooting (out to 800 yards) with the .308 Winchester cartridge. You zero it at 100 yards, and the reticle is marked with the appropriate holdover points all the way out to 800.
@ Lily:
irretrievably.
Lily wrote:
or for that exact model call Eric Holder and speak Spanish…
brookly red wrote:
You bad. L
L
lobo91 wrote:
OK can’t be of help…
@ brookly red:
I suspect that the Mexican cartels shoot a lot like Muslims do.
No need for a scope like that for spray-and-pray.
@ BatGuano:
I was tired of that place well before I was banned. The place was already turning into a mess.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Bingo!
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
I am a project manager… I know how to get things done.
@ brookly red:
I’ve found a number of places that carry it. They’re all out of stock.
I’ll probably just wait until Midway gets them back in.
brookly red wrote:
Now that’s funny.
Mike C. wrote:
Thanks.
I figure it deserves a decent scope.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
No kidding! The hate for people who believed in God ….the whole thing. I got banned for just reading a thread the secret thread were Zombie was banned because I didn’t comment. Dumb. I like it here better.
song_and_dance_man wrote:
gosh every time I seriously try to help people think I am joking, wtf?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
One “needs” a gun for the same reason one “needs” a fire extinguisher in one’s home, or a seat belt in one’s car. Prudence dictates that, if certain tools are available that may help one to preserve his life in the case of certain eventualities, that one should avail himself of those tools.
lobo91 wrote:
Yep. No skills.
lobo91 wrote:
Things that make grown men drool. Springfield M1A makes it worse. Love my Ruger M77 .308 synthetic stock.
brookly red wrote:
There ya go! That’s place to go! LOL!
lobo91 wrote:
fine, whatever, deport his ass the sooner the better.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Exactly.
And unlike a wrench or a drill bit, when the tool you need is a gun, you don’t have time to go to Home Depot and pick it up.
brookly red wrote:
Ya know maybe it’s the in the way ya word it. Just saying.
@ Lily:
CJ banned everyone who had given him credibility. I’m just being Captain obvious.
Tanker wrote:
got M1903 Springfield .30-06… drool away.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Many people who do not feel that need will not accept that you or I or someone else does. But while you are right in the larger sense, it does not matter; the fundamental point is that you don’t get to determine my needs, and I don’t get to determine yours.
Whether one of us feels the “need” for a gun or a Faberge egg, it is we who determine our own needs, not someone else.
@ Tanker:
I have this one.
I looked at the synthetic stock, but I didn’t like the feel of it. It’s a little shorter, along with being lighter. I have fairly long arms.
@ BatGuano:
Yeah he’s boring now and annoying…haven’t been there in years.
lobo91 wrote:
I suppose Springfield is the best after all.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Excatly I like soda’s….you don’t…you don’t get to tell me not to drink them. In essense.
@ brookly red:
Nothing wrong with Rugers. I own one of theirs, too.
I was referring to the synthetic stock version of the M1A, though.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
well unfortunately it is usually others that do actually determine our need for a gun… often in packs of 4 or 5. Juss saying
lobo91 wrote:
Yours Loaded Match grade or standard? I sold a match grade about 7 years ago….dumbass move on my part!
@ Lily:
I’m still posting crap there now. His sentry’s are asleep.
lobo91 wrote:
oh boy…
@ Tanker:
Mine is a loaded, with the stainless barrel and walnut stock.
lobo91 wrote:
the first time I shot it was a Ruger .22 with the rotary clip I really wanted one but my father got me the Browning T-bolt instead… Gosh I am old.
@ Lily:
Offer void in NYC
//
@ brookly red:
The venerable 10/22. First gun I bought with my own money. $69 when I was 16.
They go for close to $300 now.
Lily wrote:
A Molotov cocktail, or better yet, a hand grenade pitched off a dark roof into the heart of the mob would be very effective. Most likely no person, and no video camera, would be able to see or identify the hurler, and he or she could make a clean getaway.
lobo91 wrote:
I would rather have my Springfield (Walnut stock) back, but having a .308 is a must in my book so Ruger it is for now! My 30.06 is a Mouser!
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Best one I’ve heard was “A gun is like a parachute, you may never need it, but if you do and don’t have one…”.
BatGuano wrote:
Oooooooooooooh why????? Isn’t it just plain nutty over there???
lobo91 wrote:
my first gun was a 1909 Win .22ca short pumper…12 shots I think…a downsized toy
lobo91 wrote:
yeah… we used to saw off most of the barrel and the stock in shop class.
This is disturbing:
When did I move to New York?
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
I do believe you have a plan there. Kill the cell phones and the video camera’s too. Yeah I think this would work.
brookly red wrote:
I want a sawed off .410 auto load for home D…people think I’m crazy
@ Lily:
Very nutty. I’m just waiting for them to catch on.
lobo91 wrote:
Yep.
heysoos wrote:
My youngest son’s first gun bought when he was 5 (19 now) was a Marlin Model 60 18 shot tube. He still loves that gun, really reliable.
heysoos wrote:
then get this…http://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=662&category=Revolver
BatGuano wrote:
LOL! That’s going to be a loooooooooong wait.
Tanker wrote:
In NY that is an “assault rifle” …
@ Lily:
Apparently so. I just got a response from CJ!
brookly red wrote:
I’ve checked them out, they come in a 5′ barrel too, I think…hell of a car jack deterrent…when a 410 slug comes roaring out the barrel, game over
BatGuano wrote:
no matter how much he begs don’t send him any money.
@ brookly red:
Not a chance.
heysoos wrote:
they got great loads… 3 pcs of shot, followed by 3 discs, followed by 2 pcs shot in 1 load!
New Thread.
Cool, I step away to make some soup and we new have a gun thread!
Rodan wrote:
Dagnabbit!
I wuz just gettin used to this one agin.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I agree with that, and failed to state it explicitly, because to me it’s so obvious, that stating it verges on redundant. But libs are dense, for sure.
@ Tanker:
Hey, Tanker! I went back and added another comment to the bottom of those to Moran’s piece:
Boy, the libs would hate this video:
@ heysoos:
Read this: Box O Truth.
lobo91 wrote:
The cricket….granddaughter’s revenge! My daughter thought it was pellet rifle when I gave it to my granddaughter. Thought she was going to faint when the trigger was pulled the first time!
@ lobo91:
That little pink rifle reminds me of time I tried to talk my wife letting me build her a pink accented AR.
She looked at me like I was picking my nose in public.
Ah, well, I have made significant inroads with her anti-firearm upbringing, but Rome wasn’t built in a day I guess.