First time visitor? Learn more.

Jukebox Hero OOT

by lobo91 ( 87 Comments › )
Filed under Music, OOT at February 5th, 2013 - 10:55 pm

Everyone wants to be a jukebox hero, right?

 

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

87 Responses to “Jukebox Hero OOT”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Lily
    1 | February 5, 2013 10:57 pm

    Yeah!!!! Now one for all the Night Owls…


  2. Lily
    2 | February 5, 2013 11:01 pm

    I’ve got the thread to myself?


  3. Lily
    3 | February 5, 2013 11:05 pm


  4. lobo91
    4 | February 5, 2013 11:09 pm

    @ Lily:

    I’m watching Justified.


  5. CynicalConservative
    5 | February 5, 2013 11:09 pm

    I got nothin…

    /galt


  6. heysoos
    6 | February 5, 2013 11:12 pm

    plug yer hears…


  7. Calo
    7 | February 5, 2013 11:13 pm

    @ CynicalConservative:
    Meh!

    Quitter


  8. CynicalConservative
    8 | February 5, 2013 11:18 pm

    @ Calo:
    Shite happens.

    /reload

    //galt


  9. Lily
    9 | February 5, 2013 11:21 pm

    @ lobo91:

    I like that show!!! ;)


  10. lobo91
    10 | February 5, 2013 11:27 pm

    @ Lily:

    It’s my favorite show.


  11. 11 | February 5, 2013 11:40 pm

    Unfortunatly the Wife HATES justified. So I have to DVR it and watch the next day!


  12. CynicalConservative
    12 | February 5, 2013 11:43 pm

    @ Calo:
    Ok, fine.

    /galt


  13. Lily
    13 | February 5, 2013 11:48 pm

    AZOlddog wrote:

    Unfortunatly the Wife HATES justified. So I have to DVR it and watch the next day!

    Dude…that’s bad…I’m sure she’d hate *Sons of Anachary* too. ;)


  14. Lily
    14 | February 5, 2013 11:50 pm

    @ CynicalConservative:

    Oh my!!! Got the idea from me today because I posted it today! ;)
    /good song though.


  15. Lily
    15 | February 5, 2013 11:53 pm

    Secret post! They know who this is for. ;)


  16. 16 | February 5, 2013 11:54 pm

    @ Lily:
    She probably would if I wanted to watch it! I don’t like it, not hate just don’t like! :)


  17. Calo
    17 | February 5, 2013 11:55 pm

    @ CynicalConservative:
    Perfect imagery after I just finished up shopping for Halloween tonight.


  18. CynicalConservative
    18 | February 6, 2013 12:04 am

    @ Lily:
    Nope, Youtube is actually blocked 99% of the time for me, so I have no idea what’s been posted lately. I just had that link handy so threw it out there.

    oh well, sucks to be me

    /galt


  19. Lily
    19 | February 6, 2013 12:08 am


  20. Lily
    20 | February 6, 2013 12:10 am

    @ CynicalConservative:

    LOL!!!!! Then GMTA then!!!!!!! Great song! We think alike then! ;)


  21. Lily
    21 | February 6, 2013 12:11 am

    AZOlddog wrote:

    @ Lily:
    She probably would if I wanted to watch it! I don’t like it, not hate just don’t like!

    My husband is a biker so he *loves* that show!!! ;)
    /ask Calo what his bike looks like. 8-)


  22. Lily
    22 | February 6, 2013 12:14 am

    @ CynicalConservative:

    A song for you to make up for my oops on that …..so sorry!


  23. Lily
    23 | February 6, 2013 12:16 am

    @ CynicalConservative:

    I sent you a happy song! :)
    /actually we have the same tastes in songs sometimes. ;)


  24. Calo
    24 | February 6, 2013 12:18 am

    @ Lily:
    Lily’s husband has a really big bike.

    OK, now that just sounds wrong when I read what I just wrote aloud back.


  25. Lily
    25 | February 6, 2013 12:19 am

    Where’s everyone?
    I’m lonely now!


  26. Lily
    26 | February 6, 2013 12:20 am

    @ Calo:

    Naw…..Calo speaks the truth! ;)


  27. Calo
    27 | February 6, 2013 12:21 am

    Oh look!

    Someone posted a link on DoD last night that made me laugh.


  28. Lily
    28 | February 6, 2013 12:21 am

    @ Lily:

    CC?
    Where you at?


  29. Lily
    29 | February 6, 2013 12:25 am

    @ Calo:

    Well it’s just me and you….no one wants to talk to us *soul sister*!


  30. Lily
    30 | February 6, 2013 12:29 am


  31. Calo
    31 | February 6, 2013 12:29 am

    We will double kill the thread before the night is over, Lily, no guns necessary.


  32. Lily
    32 | February 6, 2013 12:32 am

    @ Calo:

    A double murder….. oh well….. 8-)

    Let’s rock!


  33. Lily
    33 | February 6, 2013 12:34 am


  34. Calo
    34 | February 6, 2013 12:36 am

    @ Lily:
    I might need some Southern Rock next, please.


  35. Lily
    35 | February 6, 2013 12:36 am

    @ Calo:

    Want to hear a song from my cousin?????? ;)


  36. Lily
    36 | February 6, 2013 12:40 am

    @ Calo:

    Will do….


  37. Calo
    37 | February 6, 2013 12:40 am

    @ Lily:
    BEYONCE, baby!

    Sometimes I wish my butt looked as good as hers does.


  38. Lily
    38 | February 6, 2013 12:42 am

    @ Calo:

    Coming up!!!!!


  39. Lily
    39 | February 6, 2013 12:45 am


  40. Calo
    40 | February 6, 2013 12:46 am

    What if she’s a transsexual and I am lusting after her a**?


  41. Lily
    41 | February 6, 2013 12:48 am

    @ Lily:

    I like this song though…..because I have survived…


  42. Lily
    42 | February 6, 2013 12:49 am

    Calo wrote:

    What if she’s a transsexual and I am lusting after her a**?

    Naw you just want to look *hot*!!!
    /and don’t think you aren’t now! ;)


  43. Lily
    43 | February 6, 2013 12:53 am

    A rockin classic……Calo!


  44. Lily
    44 | February 6, 2013 12:56 am

    Calo wrote:

    What if she’s a transsexual and I am lusting after her a**?

    Then again you might be confused…… :shock:


  45. Lily
    45 | February 6, 2013 12:57 am

    Lily wrote:

    Calo wrote:
    What if she’s a transsexual and I am lusting after her a**?
    Then again you might be confused……

    I know you weren’t born that way!!!!!!


  46. Lily
    46 | February 6, 2013 12:59 am

    One of my theme songs. Oh yeah.


  47. Moe Katz
    47 | February 6, 2013 1:01 am

    Folks, this one goes out to the Power Tool Primate:


  48. Lily
    48 | February 6, 2013 1:04 am

    Calo wrote:

    What if she’s a transsexual and I am lusting after her a**?

    Would the doc’s make you into a chicken if you felt you were born a chicken in a womens body???? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?


  49. Lily
    49 | February 6, 2013 1:06 am

    Another cajun song …..


  50. Moe Katz
    50 | February 6, 2013 1:11 am

    8% of Canadians admit to having had sex in a canoe. We are a nation of canoedlers.


  51. 51 | February 6, 2013 1:12 am

    @ Calo:
    That one stopped me in my tracks for a bit. My mind went blake.


  52. Lily
    52 | February 6, 2013 1:13 am

    A personal fav that we both like….. ;)


  53. Lily
    53 | February 6, 2013 1:17 am

    @ Moe Katz:

    LOL! ;)


  54. Lily
    54 | February 6, 2013 1:18 am

    @ Moe Katz:
    @ Bunk X:

    Dammit I’m striking out!!!! :(


  55. Calo
    55 | February 6, 2013 1:19 am

    @ Moe Katz:
    ROTF, yep! I like living in the land of the confused.


  56. huckfunn
    56 | February 6, 2013 1:19 am

    The imbeds are bogging the thread. Recommendation. Give a description and then the url
    Tom Petty: The Waiting
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQQ6yaBX300
    Great tune.


  57. 57 | February 6, 2013 1:20 am

    @ Lily:
    What.


  58. Lily
    58 | February 6, 2013 1:20 am


  59. Calo
    59 | February 6, 2013 1:21 am

    @ Bunk X:
    @ Lily:
    Your not swinging with a broad brush tonight, Lily.

    It doubles your chances for a base hit.


  60. Lily
    60 | February 6, 2013 1:22 am

    @ huckfunn:

    Sorry. I’ll stop…it’s time for me to get off anyway. Nite.


  61. Lily
    61 | February 6, 2013 1:23 am

    @ Calo:

    I know!!!! :oops:


  62. Lily
    62 | February 6, 2013 1:24 am

    Nite everyone! Have a good one! :)


  63. huckfunn
    63 | February 6, 2013 1:24 am

    @ Lily:
    Sweet dreams.


  64. huckfunn
    64 | February 6, 2013 1:28 am

    Leon Russell; Sweet Home Chicago
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Vmz_nQ4ZY


  65. Lily
    65 | February 6, 2013 1:30 am

    Before I go to bed and huck forgive me I love embeds…. sorry.


  66. Lily
    66 | February 6, 2013 1:32 am

    Huck forgive me….it was a special song….and no more tonight for me I promise!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please leave it up….pretty please! :(


  67. Moe Katz
    67 | February 6, 2013 1:32 am

    @ Lily:
    Lily, I’m working on getting some science links together for the blog on this question. But let me just say this (and this I address also to Lobo): We know that people do not choose their gender identification or their sexuality. These things emerge in us at a very age, for reasons that are not yet fully understood, although experience and biology both seem to play a part. I’m happy to be living in a time when the world is becoming more inclusive and more accepting of sexual minorities, a world in which we don’t have authority figures holding rigid standards over us about who we can be and what orientation is okay or not okay. Sometime I have to swallow hard not to be shocked or judgmental, but I do my best to accept everyone, because I think everyone deserves that acceptance, that ratification of their identity by others, as long as they aren’t harming anyone else. For me, our ability to accept a greater variety of sexual orientations and gender identities is one of the great accomplishments of our time, though it is a work in progress.


  68. huckfunn
    68 | February 6, 2013 1:34 am

    Lily wrote:

    Before I go to bed and huck forgive me I love embeds…. sorry.

    Great tune! Pure Prairie League was a great band.
    I love the imbeds and the music threads. Problem is the imbeds totally choke the thread. Clicking the url will take you to the vid and the tune.


  69. Lily
    69 | February 6, 2013 1:38 am

    @ huckfunn:

    I know. :( But that was my last one promise. ;)


  70. Lily
    71 | February 6, 2013 1:42 am

    @ Moe Katz:

    I understand your opinion…I really do. I just have a different one…but it isn’t bad like you would think. But if you would want to ask me my opinions you can …I will not mind. The only thing is tonight I have leave early because of Cardio Rehab tomorrow…it’s early…blah! It was nice seeing you on the thread! See ya tomorrow or the next day! Always enjoy talking to you! :)


  71. Lily
    72 | February 6, 2013 1:44 am

    This time for real….NITE ALL!!


  72. Moe Katz
    73 | February 6, 2013 1:45 am

    @ Lily:
    Night Lily, have a good rehab session tomorrow!


  73. BatGuano
    74 | February 6, 2013 2:14 am

    I can’t believe that I still have an account at LGF.


  74. 75 | February 6, 2013 2:16 am

    @ BatGuano:

    Try posting “Heh.” Worked for me…


  75. Calo
    76 | February 6, 2013 2:19 am

    @ BatGuano:
    Honestly, I had to laugh today reading some of that stuff posted.

    Nice work.


  76. BatGuano
    77 | February 6, 2013 2:23 am

    @ Mike C.:
    Look at the latest diary of Daedalus.CJ even responded to my post.He’s clueless.


  77. Calo
    78 | February 6, 2013 2:24 am

    @ BatGuano:
    And, don’t say much more on this site, please.

    Sentries are on watch.


  78. BatGuano
    79 | February 6, 2013 2:26 am

    @ Calo:
    Thank you.It’s fun messing with them.


  79. BatGuano
    80 | February 6, 2013 2:28 am

    @ Calo:
    I think they are all sleeping on post.


  80. 81 | February 6, 2013 3:02 am

    I don’t read DoD but only because I kong ago gave up caring about Chaz & Co.


  81. BatGuano
    82 | February 6, 2013 3:14 am

    @ Mike C.:
    I don’t care about him either; I just like jerking his chain.


  82. BatGuano
    83 | February 6, 2013 3:21 am

    I have an old but serviceable 9mm hand gun but would like a semi-automatic rifle. Any suggestions out there?


  83. BatGuano
    84 | February 6, 2013 3:34 am

    The doldrums.


  84. 85 | February 6, 2013 5:11 am

    BatGuano wrote:

    I have an old but serviceable 9mm hand gun but would like a semi-automatic rifle. Any suggestions out there?

    Not a good time to want to buy one of those. There’s always the most popular design, the AR. Most (AR-15) fire the dirt-common (or was) .223 Remington/5.56 mm NATO round. The most customizeable rifle in the world. Gas piston uppers make them better (IMHO) if you’ve got the coin. There’s also the AR-10 variant in 7.62 NATO (.308 Winchester). Bitching rifle… To keep on the 7.62 NATO theme, there’s the Springfield Armory M1A rifle, a currently made semi-auto version of the M 14. A superb rifle. Bring your wallet.

    Then there’s the AK-47 design, firing the 7.62 Soviet round. Probably # 2 in popularity. More cheaply made and less accurate than the ARs, but packing more of a punch. Don’t personally like them myself, but that’s a matter of individual taste They are the most widespread military rifle (the automatic version) in use today. Allah says don’t leave the tent without one.

    Lagging behind at # 3 is the somewhat stealthy/less Fudd frightening Ruger Mini-14. Chambered for the .223/5.56 round, althought there is a variant (the Mini-30) chambered for the Soviet 7.62 round. In most configurations, looks less scary than a standard EBR. Also based on the M 14 action, which in turn derives from the M1 Garand action. I’ve got one of these and quite like it. Even the most Fuddish version can be accesorized to look as Tacti-Cool as you could want. My modifications have been limited to adding a GG&G rail and a Burris mini red dot sight.

    Then there’s always the actual M1 Garand itself. If you belong to a CMP-recognized organization, you can still get one of these old warhorses. 8 rounds, .30-06. The gun that won WW II and Korea. You can get a :rack grade” version my CMP and delivered right to your doorstep by the USPS (which you can’t do with any other gun) for $ 555, hard case included. There are more expensive, better versions as well, but even a rack grade will shoot.

    Down in rimfire, there are a number of semi-auto designs still made, but the king of that hill is the Ruger 10/22, the most popular rimfire rifle in recent years. Also capable of wide accessorization.

    With the exception of that M1 Garand from CMP, all of the above are essentially Unobtainium today, or at least at anything approaching a rational price. Can’t get ammo for them, either.


  85. 86 | February 6, 2013 5:19 am

    @ Mike C.:

    Addendum -- I now belong to a CMP-recognized organization, and am giving serious consideration to getting a “service grade” M1 Garand myself, just to have it. “Service grade” is $ 655 delivered, incl. hard case. My dad would have had one of those back in the 6th Marine Division in 44-45.


  86. Guggi
    87 | February 6, 2013 9:30 am

    Moe Katz wrote:

    Lily, I’m working on getting some science links together for the blog on this question. But let me just say this (and this I address also to Lobo): We know that people do not choose their gender identification or their sexuality. These things emerge in us at a very age, for reasons that are not yet fully understood, although experience and biology both seem to play a part. I’m happy to be living in a time when the world is becoming more inclusive and more accepting of sexual minorities, a world in which we don’t have authority figures holding rigid standards over us about who we can be and what orientation is okay or not okay.

    It’s not about exclusion it’s about destroying the core issues of the main society. There is no argueable reason for same sex marriage. How do you prevent polygamy if you allow same sex marriage ? While polygamy only extends the rules to two and more women same sex marriage alters the entire idea of the concept of marriage (and no: the idea of marriage has nothing to do with love).

    Beside this there is a minor problem: the gay community is divided into two camps: one which claims they are born gay and the other which claims it is their choice to live as gays (!) and this matches perfectly with the claim of some Evangelical groups. I’m with you that homosexuality causes in a combination of prenatal and postnatal social, biological, and psychological factors and that sexual orientation is (more or less) fixed at the childs age of about five years. That’s why so many gays claim that they were born gay and have known they were gay since they were about five.

    re. inclusion: during most of the time of mankind homosexuals haven’t been excluded from society.

    Sometime I have to swallow hard not to be shocked or judgmental, but I do my best to accept everyone, because I think everyone deserves that acceptance, that ratification of their identity by others, as long as they aren’t harming anyone else. For me, our ability to accept a greater variety of sexual orientations and gender identities is one of the great accomplishments of our time, though it is a work in progress.

    Where do you stop with „identity“? Is BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder) acceptable for you? If you perform phalloplasty and vaginoplasty how can you deny someones bid to cut off a limb to make his „identity complete“? (I write „his“ because I coudn’t discover a single female who suffered from BIID and more than two thirds of the males are gays and the most common claim is to cut off the left leg above the knee).

    With making „identity“ your first choice of judgment you fall into trap of the old sexism. „Identity“ is the old sexism only nicely dressed up and labeled with another – better sounding – term. You no longer judge this person on her/his character or what she/he stands for but about with which sexual identity she/he identifies her/himself. You don’t include but exclude them, you make them „special“. Both „civil rights“ as „human rights“ claim that gender/sexual orientation shouldn’t be a tool for discrimination but you do exact this. Now you could claim that this is „positive“ discrimination and the opposite to „negative“ discrimination. I say nonse although I admit that there is a difference:

    Under „negative“ discrimination you single out a minority group and discriminate this minority group.

    Under „positive“ discrimination you single out a minority group and discriminate the majority.

    I can’t accept neither one.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David