General Douglas MacArthur once said “old soldiers don’t die, they just fade away.” Unfortunately, MacArthur’s saying does not apply to ex servicemen who become Senators. John McCain has become an embarrassment and is clearly senile fool. He is now open to tax increases to avoid sequestration. This is the stance of the Obama Regime, who the first time since the 2010 elections are on the losing end of a political standoff. McCain is knocking the feet out under Republicans and helping the Obama Regime.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Sunday that he is willing to consider supporting new tax revenue as part of a plan to avert $85 billion in looming budget cuts, as the White House pushed back against Republican lawmakers who say President Obama is solely responsible for the spending reductions.
McCain made the comments as he once again warned about the adverse effects of the spending reductions, known as sequestration, that will require federal agencies to slash $85 billion in spending by Sept. 30 — including $43 billion at the Pentagon.
“Republicans and Democrats are responsible for this new cliff and I’ll take responsibility for it for the Republicans,” McCain said of the spending cuts. “But we’ve got to avoid it. We’ve got to stop it.”
Averting the cuts “requires bipartisanship,” McCain added. “Will I look at revenue closers? Maybe so. But we’ve already just raised taxes. Why do we have to raise taxes again?”
I wish this senile Muslim Brotherhood stooge would take MacArthur advise and just fade away. There are plenty of great golf courses in Arizona, he could spend his time being useful there.
Update: Eaglesoars pointed out that McCain can’t use his hands for many functions. I forgot about that and the gold course analogy was metaphorical. That said, he can enjoy his time watching some good golf, heck I would!
This guy is a senile jerk.
He’s a disgrace!
@ Rodan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyTtFNGzFsE
@ Rodan:
He wont fade away.
Chris Kyle memorial in Cowboys Stadium, Arlington Texas. Live stream here.
Following the service, a motorcade will carry his body 200 miles south to be buried in The Texas State Cemetery in Austin.
BatGuano wrote:
Old soldiers fade away, old a-holes just continue to annoy.
Wait. I saw him on Sunday is this is NOT what I understood him to mean. Yes, he does want to avoid sequestration and he will agree to some taxes WITH REDUCTION IN SPENDING. It wasn’t nearly as one-sided as it’s presented here.
eaglesoars wrote:
How many times have we heard that tired old song before? And each time he and the others who warble it crumple like cheap umbrellas in a hurricane.
Rodan, shame on you. He can’t type, comb his hair, tie his shoes due to his war injuries. And I think he limps.
The lede is misleading. I watched him and his demeanor vis a vis tax hikes was CLEARLY one of last-resort distaste.
@ eaglesoars:
New taxes are indefensible. There will be no reduction in spending.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
And it may turn out like that again. But nothing in McCain’s remarks is PRPEDCICTIVE of that.
I just think the presentation of this piece is unfair.
BatGuano wrote:
Preachin’ to the choir. But I’m still not sure Obama is going to win on this one.
Rodan wrote:
You think he is a disgrace to YOU? Try being a Republican in Arizona and watch the buffons the state “establishment” put up against him!
Oh Yeah and the DemProgs all vote for him also!
AZOlddog wrote:
i feel for ya. we had arlen sphincter, then we removed him.
@ eaglesoars:
Pelosi made it pretty clear in yesterday’s interview with Chris Wallace that they have no intention of making any actual cuts in anything. She and Obama are railing against the minor cuts that are going to come as a result of the sequester, much less any cuts that would make a difference.
@ Rodan:
Karl Rove loves him! Get with the republican program.
MacDuff wrote:
like hemorrhoids
lobo91 wrote:
Seriously, I thought someone had spiked my morning tea w/LSD. “We Don’t have a spending problem, we have a budget deficit problem”
@ eaglesoars:
You have seen this movie before. McCain by saying he is open to new revenue, just created a crack Obama will press through. The Obama Regime have no intentions of reducing spending. By saying he is open, Obama will now put pressure on the GOP with his balance approach crap.
McCain just gave him fodder and that was the point of the thread.
@ eaglesoars:
I forgot about that. I was being metaphorical about golf courses and not literal. I’ll update the thread to make it clear.
Foreign policy and national security was what he was always about. Like Nixon, he never gave a rats ass about economics and on the domestic side all he cares about is amnesty.
eaglesoars wrote:
And even after Wallace pointed out to her that if you took every penny the so-called rich earn, you couldn’t make up the difference, she just continued on yapping about how “we have to try” or some such nonsense.
And her new favorite term, “evidence-based,” is seriously getting on my nerves.
@ eaglesoars:
I updated the thread explaining the golf course reference was metaphorical.
@ lobo91:
Pelosi is not of this reality…she lives elsewhere
McCain is infamous for “reaching across the aisle” to his democrat “friends”.
Speranza wrote:
His foreign policy is just as atrocious as Obama. If he were President we would have troops on the ground in Syria fighting alongside al-Qaeda.
BatGuano wrote:
The Judas Kiss from The Architect aka Pig Vomit.
BatGuano wrote:
How did that work out for him in 2008?
Rodan wrote:
He still thinks getting rid of Gaddafi was the best decision.
BatGuano wrote:
he’s old school, gentlemanly….it’s over for him, now days you gotta knife your opponent then kick him when he hits the ground….partisanship has left him in the dust
Obama says the job of debt reduction is nearly done:
Even the Washington Post isn’t buying this bullshit. Obama really does think the American people are dumb. I gues he figures if 51% of us voted for him, 51% of us are terminally stupid.
Iron Fist wrote:
He is, alas, correct.
@ Iron Fist:
I would add that one reason he is correct is that his buddy Ayers, and Ayers’ allies in the world of “education,” have worked long and hard to ensure that the American people would be stupid enough to elect Obama.
@ Speranza:
I think he had lost it.
@ Iron Fist:
I guess my problem is that I don’t speak Democrat.
In English, “reducing” something means to make is smaller.
Our debt has gone up every days since he took office, and will do so every day he remains there.
How is that a reduction?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
just wait til the herd stampedes
The republican establishment does not understand that we have to survive in the dysfunctional world they are helping to create. Fuck Rove and the horse he rode in on!
@ Iron Fist:
When you have the media on your side and weak opposition, who can blame him.
@ lobo91:
When Democrats mean reducing, they mean reducing the percentage of increases. They have been doing this game now for who knows how long.
Nancy Pelosi – We Don’t Have A Spending Problem
(emphasis mine):
Off the scale STUPID…
lobo91 wrote:
that’s easy….
watch
2+2=1
And global warming is dead last.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Obama was re-elected so, yes, he was correct.
Rodan wrote:
Thanks sweetie.
lobo91 wrote:
Good gawd, the man’s embarrassment. I don’t ever want to hear another Dan Quayle joke from one of these SOBs. Not a one.
MacDuff wrote:
Biden is living proof of the Peter Principle
@ MacDuff:
I’ve met Dan Quayle. He’s not stupid.
Biden, on the other hand, is an ass.
@ MacDuff:
You say potato, I say Patatoe.
(Ducks)
lobo91 wrote:
You know why there won’t be any ‘gun control’ laws?
Because the explosive growth in gun ownership and gun sport is among -- WOMEN
@ eaglesoars:
Another front in the Dems’ war on women…
//
lobo91 wrote:
No he’s not, quite the opposite.
I wonder if the Communists in then North Vietnam managed to brainwash Sen. McCain. He frequently adopts Communist principles of the opposition; e.g., raiiling against corporations, support for the global warming fraud, support for higher taxes; etc.
@ MacDuff:
Yes, Dan Quayle is a very smart man.
I guess this is why Biden isn’t “running for Pope”:
“I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
“[S]equestration was designed as a budget threat, not as a budget strategy, Durbin said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday.
I hope this gets some attention…BO has got to be getting nervous…I say go for it and let the blood flow
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/durbin-obama-s-sequester-threat
lobo91 wrote:
uuuh, sir, please don’t pee on that fence sir…
heysoos wrote:
yup go for it.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Reminds me of trying to force Israel to make peace with the paleosimians.
Of course, what he believes is that we aren’t spending enough…
@ heysoos:
And they keep claiming that it was Boehner’s plan, which is bullshit.
The idea of sequestration came from the White House.
BatGuano wrote:
To this day I think twice when writing the word potato. In many ways, Quayle was the first victim of the “cheap shot journalism” that’s common today,
The easiest way for a government official to succeed in troubled times is to obtain more money, create a dark paper trail, and avoid all audits. Both political parties fan out like an anvil cloud when they hit the atmospheric pressure limits. As TFK says there becomes no difference in them. Just a few words here and there.
At the working grassroots level we need accountability and audits. GWB was an Anvil thinker, as is McCain. They can’t see the grass from their elite views and make a lot of tower decisions.
@ lobo91:
That is one reason why if the Republicans know what is good for them they’ll oppose Obama on this. We’ll see. They have enough votes to stop gun control dead in the Senate if they stick together. It takes Republican votes to overcome a filibuster in the current Senate.
lobo91 wrote:
I know it’s tricky and the risk pretty high, but I think it’s worth the gamble to let the donks eat this one….the GOP has little to lose and supposedly this debt issue is a thing most working Americans see a pretty simple…time to dig in and hold the ground, maybe the truth will prevail
@ 34 buzzsawmonkey: We need a few headlines like this.
“Does voting for Obama mean you are stupid?” It will get the right conversation going.
lobo91 wrote:
darkwords wrote:
agreed…time for the ball bat approach
darkwords wrote:
I guess it depends on how many times you voted…
@ 30 Speranza: I don’t think the US is competent enough anymore to run a Middle East policy. We should just hand it off to Israel. Send China an FYI
FOX needs to put up a one hour, prime time gig exposing Benghazi and the cowardice of the CinC and his Sec State
heysoos wrote:
Preaching to the choir.
Most people who watch FNC already know the story, and the rest will diesregard anything they show anyway.
OT
I wish the Pope had said he was resigning “to spend more time with his family.”
heysoos wrote:
And Brit Hume needs to do it.
Tomorrow the e-book “Benghazi: The Definitive Report” becomes available. I’m going to download it, but it’s not sourced AT ALL apparently.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
or….hey, I’m a pious guy but I dig sport fishing too
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I wish he had excommunicated Pelosie first…
@ 73 buzzsawmonkey: Heh!!! still time.
lobo91 wrote:
think positive…it ain’t over yet…you give us reasons to not try, I’ll fight with a rock and a stick
heysoos wrote:
Apparently there is no need /////
White House: All questions answered on Benghazi attack
@ 76 brookly red: We could start shipping her staff wooden stakes in case they need them
@ heysoos:
They’ve already done that, back before Christmas. IIRC, Bret Baier did the reporting on it. I guess they have more to expose now, but what they had then was pretty damning.
@ citizen_q: ” What difference does it make” Parting words of some popular government honcho” I think that is the Animal House wing of the Democratic party.
@ citizen_q:
time to double the pressure…there is blood in the water, where are the GOP sharks?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
That makes total sense. Before he was made pope, he was already planning to resign to spend time with his brother, who is a Priest.
heysoos wrote:
“Top ‘sky pilot’ goes sky-diving!”
brookly red wrote:
…and Biden, second.
Iron Fist wrote:
they could run the latest CBO numbers, the lawsuits, drag the CC into it, run with the CA debacle…lots of stuff, all of it…make BO accountable for his deception…at least TRY for gods sake
@ heysoos:
@ Iron Fist:
@ citizen_q:
@ lobo91:
The American people do not care about Benghazi. We can wail all day about it, but most Americans don’t care or think people talking about it are crazy. I don’t like that, but it is what it is. This is not the magic bullet to destroy Obama.
Speaking of Pelosi:
So now the Dems are getting policy advice from 10 year olds?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I have no beef with the CC or the Pope…he’s a man, just like me but with more endearing habits I suppose…a man nevertheless
MacDuff wrote:
I think Biden is protected by the “child like mentality” clause…
lobo91 wrote:
Carter set the precedent -taking advice from Amy on nuclear weapons.
lobo91 wrote:
Sad to say, that would be an improvement.
heysoos wrote:
Hiding under Mommy’s bed…
Rodan wrote:
I don’t care about magi bullets or bringing down BO…I care about the truth, when Americans die in service to their country I deserve to know the truth…and there are millions like me, it will not go away
gotta run some errands.
be good.
lobo91 wrote:
I guess the alleged 8 year old didn’t pan out…
eaglesoars wrote:
Of course this is exactly contradictory to what she said yesterday with Wallace. She said that they don’t want to legislate based on “anecdotes,” and that “the plural of anecdote isn’t data.”
I doubt that she could actually define “anecdote” or “data,” but that’s not really the point.
lobo91 wrote:
Isn’t that an improvement??
heysoos wrote:
Interestingly it is Lindsey Graham poking them.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
I suppose it’s better than taking advice from Jesse Jackson, who claimed that a semi-auto AR-15 can be used to “blow up railroads.”
lobo91 wrote:
heh, how can you tell when a dem is lying?…
citizen_q wrote:
Not really. Miss Lindsey is up for reelection in ’14 and is feeling the heat…
lobo91 wrote:
no one needs 20 shots to kill a rail road…
@ heysoos:
I’m with you, but sadly most people don’t care. That’s why this story has gotten no traction. It’s sad and Ambassador Stevens was killed because of lack of security. Yet people don’t care, they love Obama and he can nothing wrong.
It’s just a sad state of affairs.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
I have been sayin his own is gonna eat him…
Rodan wrote:
nothing like a bread line to wake people up…
lobo91 wrote:
Jesse is one of those talented few that can phuckup an iron ball with a wooden stick…
Rodan wrote:
it is sad…but when you give up, it’s over…those SEALs didn’t give up and I won’t either…I realize I’m accomplishing little on this blog, but I have the spirit and so do many others
Rodan wrote:
Most people that I run into, have only the foggiest idea of Benghazi. The press has done an excellent job as an arm of the the DNC and the obama campaign to cover this up. Many still naively trust the media.
If Benghazi were a big deal, why don’t they see it in the nightly news?
Personally I also angry with the Romney campaign for not sticking to their guns initially, and using this as soon as it was apparent what a disaster it was and coupled with the amateurish cover-ups. I kept waiting for the ads that never appeared.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
All our elected officials should be feeling some electoral heat.
@ heysoos:
I’m not saying do not discuss it. My point is that its a sad day that the public does not care about a dead Ambassador.
Obama can anally rape a 5 year old on TV and the people will still love him.
brookly red wrote:
Rove’s cavalry will come riding in with TV ads blasting to to save Miss Lindsey from the EVIL minions of the TEA Party.
@ brookly red:
I don’t know if that would work with this guy. He can have everyone living in shanty towns and the people will love him.
Rodan wrote:
As long as they have their Obamaphones…
Rodan wrote:
it’s already working… as we say in the business “ask you doctor…”
liberals…
after getting pasted by Sandy the FEMA response has been dismal, many properties are still in shambles, so what does the city do?….raise property taxes
http://tinyurl.com/cz8gyqa
@ lobo91:
You know what, that’s the sad part. As long as they feel Obama “cares” about them,. people will love him.
I’ll tell you were the GOP went wrong. After the 2010 elections, their surrender in the Lame Duck Session set the stage for Obama’s come back. Plus they fought him with kids gloves. But that lame duck set up Obama’s re-election.
heysoos wrote:
I am glad you mentioned that… a lot of libs are starting to realize that really is a dick in their ass… pardon my vulgarity but it is accurate.
Forward!
lobo91 wrote:
well we should automatically sign people up for foodstamps when they file for underemployment, it could reduce the state workforce and save a lot of money…
brookly red wrote:
Ahh the sweet taste of liberal tears!
No matter how bad things get for America, the liberal areas are going to suffer more.
They have more biological government infrastructure.
@ brookly red:
Which is why it won’t happen
@ coldwarrior:
We have Boxer and Feinstein. And Nancy Pelosi, or as I call them, the Stygeon Witches.
@ lobo91:
Going to “rural America” to sell gun control?
That’ll go over like a lead zeppelin.
Carolina Girl wrote:
The Unholy Trinity or Macbeth’s three witches.
Carolina Girl wrote:
A great rock band!
@ Rodan:
Starving people in theUkraine loved Uncle Joe Stalin. Cults of Personality are scary things. It would be bad enough if Obama were doing something to merit respect, let alone reverence, but he isn’t.
@ Speranza:
Flyboy’s favorite. That and Rush.
well, I’m outa news…
time to bitch or play some blues….hmmm
Iron Fist wrote:
No, no, only 29.3 % voted for him (voter turnout: 57.5 %)
Guggi wrote:
much less when you figure in voter fraud
@ lobo91:
DAMN! what a awful stat.
brookly red wrote:
This is indeed a dangerous problem in your country. I guess no other nation with democratic principles (republic or kingdom or….) has such a serious voter fraud problem like the U.S.A.
Guggi wrote:
brookly red wrote:
What is this: gallows humor ?
@ Guggi:
Yet Democrats assure us that reqiring ID to vote is RAAAAACIST. Nevermind that all other Western Democracies require positive ID to vote.
Guggi wrote:
In a way… we don’t defend our borders, our elections or our culture. Might as well hang our selves.
Iron Fist wrote:
My favorite is when they claim that there’s no problem with voter fraud, and that it’s just something Republicans made up recently.
The cliche about the dead voting in Chicago has been around since long before I was born. Everyone knows that elections are routinely stolen in Dem strongholds.
The BBC America show Copper had an episode that took place on election day of 1864. There was a bar right next to the polling station, and they had a steady stream of guys who came into the bar to get a new name to vote under. When they came back, they got a free drink as payment, and another name. It was supervised by the police.
Iron Fist wrote:
In my country you can only vote if you are on the voters list and you have to show either your ID or your passport. A driver licence is not accepted.
Iron Fist wrote:
I don’t consider our last election legitimate
@ Guggi:
In the US, we don’t have IDs issued by the federal government. A drivers license issued by your state of residence is the primary form of ID most Americans have.
And the majority of Americans don’t have passports. Of course, Europeans look down on Americans because of that, but they don’t consider the fact that we live in a huge country. It’s not like we can hop on a train and go to another country for lunch like many people in Europe can.
@ brookly red:
Anyone who does is a fool.
Or a Democrat.
I suppose that’s redundant…
lobo91 wrote:
if it was up to me I would make both voter fraud and identity theft a hanging offense… as well as offering or accepting a bribe…and if someone in a foreign land commits credit card fraud it’s OK to drone them. Enough of this bullshit.
lobo91 wrote:
Mohammad Atta had FIVE drivers licences
lobo91 wrote:
hey is it foolish to have someone else pay your way? they look at us as foolish for working.
Speaking of fools:
Another example of why you shouldn’t equate statements made by policially appointed police chiefs with the views of actual cops.
@ brookly red:
But if you’d asked him to show one to vote, you’d be a RAAAAACIST!
@ brookly red:
We’d have to kill off the entire populations of some African or eastern European countries in that case…
lobo91 wrote:
you know for some reason that historically just keeps happening…
Speranza -- are you caught up with “Ripper Street” yet?
brookly red wrote:
Hey, it was stolen fair and square.
Iron Fist wrote:
Double jeopardy. I have already been declared a raaaacist by the word’s foremost authority, I am a racist and a global warming denier
lobo91 wrote:
Without consistent, systematic controls like ID checks against legitimated voter registration, how can anyone discount fraud?
Corporations have outside auditors to confirm the veracity of in-house accounting to the stockholders, we should be afforded the same protection.
MacDuff wrote:
easy just charge less than the going rate
lobo91 wrote:
Romania. e.g.
lobo91 wrote:
And this on the heels of Pelosi saying that Washington doesn’t have a spending problem. My dear mother told me that “saying doesn’t make it so“…..she didn’t live long enough to see that basic wisdom actually called into question by these rogues and charlatans.
MacDuff wrote:
“I did not have sex with that woman”. Dems lie pathologically
I think Beckel just quoted the Bible to say that Obama rules by divine right.
MacDuff wrote:
you know we should make pols do press conferences under oath…
You just can’t make this shit up…
And these are the people who see themselves as our “intellectual betters”.
@ brookly red:
I’d prefer to see them hooked up to electric shock harnesses.
MacDuff wrote:
And what did Nye answer ?
eaglesoars wrote:
without getting all religious and quoting scripture let me just say that I for one look forward to seeing the left reap what they have sown. I will leave it at that.
Speaking of our “intellectual betters”:
lobo91 wrote:
or an electric chair
lobo91 wrote:
no really, for an elected official to knowingly make a false statement should be perjury
lobo91 wrote:
They won’t be disappointed. He’s going to go after coal.
@ brookly red:
Unfortunately, members of Congress are exempt, according to the Constitution.
eaglesoars wrote:
That’s not really because of “climate change,” though. It’s so he can further enrich his cronies in the “green energy” sector.
eaglesoars wrote:
in the meantime we can ban the use of electricity for entertainment purposes
Carolina Girl wrote:
I just got the tape from my friend, watching it tonight.
lobo91 wrote:
you know I keep looking for ways to fix this mess without bloodshed, but you keep pulling the rug out from under me
brookly red wrote:
There should absolutely be a price to be paid in the short term, particularly when the press is oft aiding and abetting some of these people.
Our “watchdog” press is eating treats from the hands of politicians and the political machine is oft fixing elections. This is the stuff that feeds uprising and revolt; it’s no wonder they’re frantic to implement gun control.
eaglesoars wrote:
I’d like to know what their carbon footprint is like.
lobo91 wrote:
Not quite. Members of Congress are exempt from being held legally accountable for what they say on the floor of Congress, except when under oath—but they are not exempt from all perjury charges.
MacDuff wrote:
I wish I could say you were wrong…
Guggi wrote:
Feyerick, who had earlier quizzed Nye about the possible link between global warming and the weekend snowstorm, was referring to Asteroid 2012 DA14, which will whiz within 17,000 miles or so of Earth on Feb 15. The asteroid’s relatively close trajectory on its latest pass of Earth has been extensively covered in recent weeks.
“No, no, no, no,” Nye replied to the spaced-out question, before gracefully extending Feyerick a lifeline by saying “except it’s all science. The word meteorology and the word meteor come from the same root, so, uhh…”
Several of Nye’s fellow scientists were less diplomatic.
“Nye was good enough to respond with what sounded like a non-sequitur … instead of saying, ‘No, dummy,’” noted Popular Science’s website.
“Dinosaurs unavailable for comment,” one person slyly commented on Twitter.
Most asteroids are leftovers from the formation of our solar system about 4.6 billion years ago, noted Space.com, making it impossible for it or anything else hurtling through space to be affected by changes in Earth’s atmosphere.
Most asteroids are leftovers from the formation of our solar system about 4.6 billion years ago,
so is Nancy Pelosie… what’s you point?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Close enough.
You’d never be able to prosecute them for most false statements, anyway, because they could always claim that it was opinion.
politicians should be kept in cages to minimize the harm they do…feed them once a day…maybe
Obama continues his tradition of making everything about him:
MacDuff wrote:
lobo91 wrote:
I pray to God I am allowed to live long enough to see these bastards receive their rewards.
New Thread.
I’ve got a bow tie—several, in fact.
Maybe I can be a “science guy” on TV too.
brookly red wrote:
heh…I’m almost 61…I think about that everyday…I have two grandchildren now
http://www.esquire.com/features/man-who-shot-osama-bin-laden-0313
if this is true and I say if even though I suspect it is… well guess the rest.
@ brookly red:
That former SEAL is supposed to be on Hannity tonight.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
/oh great and I suppose at taxpayer expense?
lobo91 wrote:
people talk about their guns and revolution and all, but I think a coup is more likely… they are almost begging for it.
brookly red wrote:
Why at taxpayer expense? Bill Nye is paid by the networks he appears on.
@ lobo91:
His tribute to Pope Benedict will no doubt involve posting a picture of Obama walking by St. Patrick’s in New York.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
did I really screw up or are you not MS buzzsawmonkey?
@ brookly red:
I didn’t shoot bin Laden, but that sounds an awful lot like my situation.
Carolina Girl wrote:
well it would be a Photoshop… O don’t walk these streets.
@ MacDuff:
Mac -- and I bet she really believed she sounded oh-so-intellectual when she asked it. Meanwhile….she has become the joke of the conservative blogosphere.
@ brookly red:
He’ll get out of the Presidential limo so that Mooch can grab a quick photo taken by her OBAMAFOE!!
lobo91 wrote:
well that’s why your on the watch-list…
brookly red wrote:
“MS?” Microsoft? Manuscript?
If you’re inquiring about my gender configuration, I am not now and have never been of the female persuasion.
Carolina Girl wrote:
nope Bloomberg would have even the Phat-mobile towed…
@ buzzsawmonkey:
That would require a nasty and mutilating operation
lobo91 wrote:
I vagued out for just a sec and imagined that’s what in store for Obama.
waldensianspirit wrote:
…which still would not make me a woman.
No, thanks.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
OK my bad… then yes go be science guy… I obviously have made a grave error.
brookly red wrote:
Clearly you were confused by my shapely and shaven legs…
eaglesoars wrote:
well he will either retire with stolen billions or die of anal cancer in prison… the Lord works in mysterious ways.
Are there still people supporting Dorner now that we know he called and taunted the parent of someone he murdered?
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
not if front of the other posters…
waldensianspirit wrote:
well only liberals but yes.
waldensianspirit wrote:
to them it is no worse than an abortion provider having a collection agency calling… they have no souls
I dig the whole “majority wins” part of elections, but when some 52% feel perfectly comfortable in openly trashing people of faith (except, gawd forbid, ISLAM), actively disassembling every institution and tradition that many of us hold dear, recklessly exposing us militarily, ruining us economically and worshipping the President in the manner of a demigod, I have a very, VERY serious problem.
These were elections we had in ’08 and ’12, not coups and not revolutions. The party in power DOES NOT have the privilege of destroying the vanquished and riding roughshod over the last 230 years of history. The party in power DOES NOT have the privilege of defining compromise as “do it my way, I won”- the 48% still deserve to be heard, and our voices need to be respected.
I don’t think I’m even close to being alone in getting fed up, in fact I know I’m not. Frustration is a dangerous emotion to the subject of that frustration and it grows by the day.
In the words of Howard Beale, “I’M MAD AS HELL AND I’M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANY MORE!”
@ MacDuff:
Exactly
MacDuff wrote:
well yes and no, an election without voter verification is not really an election like a trial without a jury is not really a trial. But it is what we got.
lobo91 wrote:
well that is the problem it’s not that our voices are not heard, they are… it is that our voices are not respected. Welcome to the jungle
@ waldensianspirit:
Now they’re falling all over themselves making excuses for him -- probably because he praised them in his Manifesto. Must drive them nuts -- never can find a TEA Party/NRA type to link mass killings to, but here we have a Piers Morgan and other libturd fan committing obscene and merciless acts.
Carolina Girl wrote:
and he is not even white… what are they going to do with that? was he influenced by zionic rays?
@ brookly red:
Brainwashed by the military
lobo91 wrote:
yeah thanks for having the balls to step up and post…
I’ll bet السناتور ماكين’s rectum is quite wide now, thanks to أوباما!