This entry was posted
on Friday, February 15th, 2013 at 6:00 pm and is filed under Open thread, Progressives, Satire.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
19 Responses to “I respectfully disagree: It wasn’t God who made liberals.” ( jump to bottom )
liberals are the masters of creating misery, then coming to the rescue with ‘solutions’ that make the problem worse, yet increases their influence…pretty despicable
liberals live vicariously behind their need to impose their will on others…they are insecure and have a towering inferiority complex…the result is a raging need to do unto others, with no thought of the consequence…the gun grab fury is a perfect example of their inherent weakness…I have spoken
@ Bumr50:
read the link, thanks….quite a story and a good argument for people to come in from outside politics…we need quality leadership from wherever it originates
I wasn’t here for the thread this morning discussing Bloombergs crap. Due to a massive headache I just wasn’t in any kind of mood to deal with the troll.
I relation to this and the earlier article I can put forward a couple prime examples of liberals solving problems with more problems. They banned Styrofoam in the late 70s early 80s due to a largely made up problem. This then required most companies to go to paper which caused higher tree usage. They then protested that. So many companies switched to plastic foam. Now Bloomy is leading the charge on the elimination of that. After that they will proceed to ban paper usage. This will cause major damage to the entire food industry.
Second one of the largest users of plastic foam plates in the country is the local school districts. With the ban on those it will require usage of the more expensive and less effective paper products or a return to the plastic trays which will cause higher water and energy usage.
Oh and does anyone remember that during the 70s and 80s they were pushing us to go to paper and foam plates to cut down on water usage?
This is identical to the drive by the left to eliminate paper bags in the grocery stores in the 80′s. They demanded that companies switch to primarily plastic or get fined. The companies complied, but after a few years the liberals started screaming about plastic bags. Well, paper bags were a no/no, plastic is now a no/no, so you are required to bring your own box or bag.
There is a lot of misunderstanding out there about stryofoam anyway. The styrofoam in food containers and “paper” plates are not styrofoam, they are a thing called plastic foam, you can tell by the shiny film on them. They are a mostly plastic product and recyclable. The packing peanuts in packages are also no longer styrofoam, they are a specially designed product that biodegrades almost instantly in water. Even packaging styrofoam inside of boxes for large electronics are easily broken down by water.
If anyone is old enough they remember the old ads about how styrofoam was going to last for thousands of years in our landfills. Well it turns out that was inaccurate. Most of the styrofoam from the past has already broken down and passed into the system. It is also largely an environmentally neutral product. It isn’t good for the environment, but it isn’t really very harmful either. It breaks down into particles small enough they don’t really have any detectable effect.
heysoos wrote:
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
The real question that needs we need to find an answer to is how the hell do we get rid of the liberal bastards now that they are here??
good question…it might be with votes some day…but at the rate that language and thinking have evolved, I doubt it…maybe massive failure is the cure
I really doubt that there’s enough time left to us for voting to work before TSHTF…
me neither…if we could turn this around in the next few years, which is possible, but it will be epic
Liberalism is Gnosticism. Periodically in the history of the Christian Church there have been theologians who have argued with the hierarchy and formed their own interpretations of the Scriptures. If the theologians get high enough on the scent of their own flatulence, they then start a new hierarchy based on “knowledge” (gnosis).
Right now, we got Harvard and all the little trolls therein with their “international studies” majors.
No, I am not being “anti-intellectual”. In the field of (say) math, any Harvard undergrad in math could skunk me.
But I don’t want these undergrads in positions of leadership. Leadership requires an entirely different set of skills. Parroting the latest pieties isn’t among them.
Liberalism is Gnosticism. Periodically in the history of the Christian Church there have been theologians who have argued with the hierarchy and formed their own interpretations of the Scriptures. If the theologians get high enough on the scent of their own flatulence, they then start a new hierarchy based on “knowledge” (gnosis).
Right now, we got Harvard and all the little trolls therein with their “international studies” majors.
No, I am not being “anti-intellectual”. In the field of (say) math, any Harvard undergrad in math could skunk me.
But I don’t want these undergrads in positions of leadership. Leadership requires an entirely different set of skills. Parroting the latest pieties isn’t among them.
@ Mars:
If you bring your own box or bag for grocery shopping and use it repeatedly (unless you have a washable cloth bag that you launder regularly, and that costs resources too) -- it will become a harbor for pathogenic microbes.
coldwarrior
Savage
Rodan Contributors 1389AD
Bob in Breckenridge Bunk X
Carolina Girl
Eliana Flyovercountry
Huckfunn
Iron Fist
Lobo91 Macker
MightyConservative
Philip Daniel
Speranza Urban Infidel
liberals are the masters of creating misery, then coming to the rescue with ‘solutions’ that make the problem worse, yet increases their influence…pretty despicable
Liberals were made on Sunday whenn God was not
at work.He would never do it.
They sure do hate Him.
liberals live vicariously behind their need to impose their will on others…they are insecure and have a towering inferiority complex…the result is a raging need to do unto others, with no thought of the consequence…the gun grab fury is a perfect example of their inherent weakness…I have spoken
I’m sure somebody probably already gave the heads up on this, but just for reinforcement:
Set your DVRs.
@ Bumr50:
read the link, thanks….quite a story and a good argument for people to come in from outside politics…we need quality leadership from wherever it originates
The real question that needs we need to find an answer to is how the hell do we get rid of the liberal bastards now that they are here??
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
good question…it might be with votes some day…but at the rate that language and thinking have evolved, I doubt it…maybe massive failure is the cure
heysoos wrote:
I really doubt that there’s enough time left to us for voting to work before TSHTF…
I wasn’t here for the thread this morning discussing Bloombergs crap. Due to a massive headache I just wasn’t in any kind of mood to deal with the troll.
I relation to this and the earlier article I can put forward a couple prime examples of liberals solving problems with more problems. They banned Styrofoam in the late 70s early 80s due to a largely made up problem. This then required most companies to go to paper which caused higher tree usage. They then protested that. So many companies switched to plastic foam. Now Bloomy is leading the charge on the elimination of that. After that they will proceed to ban paper usage. This will cause major damage to the entire food industry.
Second one of the largest users of plastic foam plates in the country is the local school districts. With the ban on those it will require usage of the more expensive and less effective paper products or a return to the plastic trays which will cause higher water and energy usage.
Oh and does anyone remember that during the 70s and 80s they were pushing us to go to paper and foam plates to cut down on water usage?
This is identical to the drive by the left to eliminate paper bags in the grocery stores in the 80′s. They demanded that companies switch to primarily plastic or get fined. The companies complied, but after a few years the liberals started screaming about plastic bags. Well, paper bags were a no/no, plastic is now a no/no, so you are required to bring your own box or bag.
There is a lot of misunderstanding out there about stryofoam anyway. The styrofoam in food containers and “paper” plates are not styrofoam, they are a thing called plastic foam, you can tell by the shiny film on them. They are a mostly plastic product and recyclable. The packing peanuts in packages are also no longer styrofoam, they are a specially designed product that biodegrades almost instantly in water. Even packaging styrofoam inside of boxes for large electronics are easily broken down by water.
If anyone is old enough they remember the old ads about how styrofoam was going to last for thousands of years in our landfills. Well it turns out that was inaccurate. Most of the styrofoam from the past has already broken down and passed into the system. It is also largely an environmentally neutral product. It isn’t good for the environment, but it isn’t really very harmful either. It breaks down into particles small enough they don’t really have any detectable effect.
If nature can make this kind of environmental disaster into something harmless and even beautiful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_Beach_%28Fort_Bragg,_California%29
Then something as easy to break down as styrofoam isn’t going to be a lasting issue.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
me neither…if we could turn this around in the next few years, which is possible, but it will be epic
@ Mars:
To the Politician the value of an issue is based on how many stupid people fall for the lies and not whether it is good or right.
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
And to an environmental wacko all that matters is what the feel good lie of the day is.
Mars wrote:
The more money you can squeeze out of stupid people with a lie the better.
this is my reply to tree huggers…take one minute
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHtgOgIkJlY
Liberalism is Gnosticism. Periodically in the history of the Christian Church there have been theologians who have argued with the hierarchy and formed their own interpretations of the Scriptures. If the theologians get high enough on the scent of their own flatulence, they then start a new hierarchy based on “knowledge” (gnosis).
Right now, we got Harvard and all the little trolls therein with their “international studies” majors.
No, I am not being “anti-intellectual”. In the field of (say) math, any Harvard undergrad in math could skunk me.
But I don’t want these undergrads in positions of leadership. Leadership requires an entirely different set of skills. Parroting the latest pieties isn’t among them.
Zimriel wrote:
Well stated.
not sure what’s better than Taj Mahal and Ry Cooder…two roots music icons…an American masterpiece
@ Mars:
If you bring your own box or bag for grocery shopping and use it repeatedly (unless you have a washable cloth bag that you launder regularly, and that costs resources too) -- it will become a harbor for pathogenic microbes.
IOW, you’ll get sick because it’s unsanitary.