One of the scariest politicians in America today is NY Governor Andrew Cuomo. He supports gun confiscations and the anger in his speeches would put Il Duce to shame. He started out as a Conservative Democrat, taking on the Public Sector Unions and balancing the budgets. After the 2012 election, Cuomo has interpreted that as a mandate for Progressive governance, he has gone Hard Left.
Andrew Cuomo’s newest initiative is removing any restrictions on abortion. He wants to get rid of adoption alternatives and make all abortions paid for with tax dollars.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo seeks to impose a radical new abortion regime on the state, one that goes far beyond the euphemistic byword “choice.” The bill would in fact limit many choices, for instance the choice of Catholic hospitals and other institutions with moral objections to decline to allow abortions to be performed in their facilities. It would limit the choices of organizations that counsel pregnant women if their counseling were held to be insufficiently enthusiastic about abortion. It would limit the choices of organizations that seek to help women in crisis without involving themselves in the politics of abortion.
The anodyne-sounding “Reproductive Health Act” is a very bad proposal indeed. Where it regulates, it regulates the wrong parties in the wrong way. But it also deregulates with equal disregard: It would among other things allow persons other than physicians to perform abortions.
[....]
Governor Cuomo’s bill is not about easing access to abortion — those bloody skids already are well-greased. The issue is political domination. The abortion party does not brook resistance, and it steadfastly seeks to ensure that everybody has a hand in its grisly business: taxpayers, employers, priests. All must be implicated. If a religious hospital declines to provide abortions, then it must be forced to do so. If a counseling center treats adoption as preferable to abortion, it will either change its mind or have its mind changed for it by the gentle persuasion of the State of New York.
Like the abortion provisions in the Patient Protection Act, Governor Cuomo’s proposal is a gross assault on individual liberties. The free exercise of religion requires that institutions not be forced to violate their precepts and their consciences; freedom of speech means that counseling services must be free to express their views, regardless of whether those views are welcome in Albany. Even those who support the right to abortion ought to be able to appreciate that “choice” also applies to those who do not wish to provide abortions, to house abortionists, or to finance them.
As someone who believes Social Issues should be determined at the State Level, I have no beef with NY doing abortion on demand. I live in Florida and would oppose any type of law of this nature here, but this is bigger than NY. Andrew Cuomo is one of the names mentioned for the Democrat nod in 2016. This is why he is taking Hard left on social issues. because he is NY Governor, this gives him access to the media, many of whom are based in NYC. They will hype Andrew Cuomo and he could very well get the Democrat nomination.
Some may say that Cuomo would have no chance at the Democratic nomination in 2016. I disagree with that analysis. He’s based in a big media market that has national influence. Although Cuomo is White, he’s Sicilian and not Anglo. This would allow him to play up his ethnic heritage and play the minority role. He’s hard left on social issues, which would rally the media and entertainment industry to him.
The factors I listed above would make Andrew Cuomo formidable for the Democrat nomination. Once he gets the Democratic Nod, he would be the odds on favorite as any Democrat would be for the general election. That is what is at work behind this abortion law and why it merits national attention. Cuomo is a Fascist and would be a danger to this nation as President.
Tags: Abortion, Andrew Cuomo
Andrew Cuomo is scary.
Posts like this really causes confusion for many like myself. Although I understand the national implications of the post and I also understand the states right issues, too many times people like myself have been told that it is an issue that needs to be off the table! It’s Law and I agree that the Law isn’t going to be changed.
My sole issue on abortion at that point is that my money shouldn’t ever be used to pay for them. If NY wants it this way, then so be it, just make sure no federal dollars are used for their abortions, is that really too much to be asked?
Rodan wrote:
I think “insane” is the word you are looking for. “Power-mad” also springs to mind.
@ Tanker:
Cuomo is using this issue to gain traction for the 2016 Dem nod.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
His speech on Gun Control was very Mussolini like.
I wish this loser would go away.
Report: Mitt Romney to speak at CPAC 2013
Watch Fox News hire him.
unrestricted abortion payed for with federal taxes will not fly…not in a million years
Chris Christie will support him.After all, they were both raised by Sicilian mothers.
Rodan wrote:
And this issue is used to hammer conservatives (the elusive base) over the head with daily. I have to learn, there are issues I need to not comment on!
@ heysoos:
Youtube his Gun Control speech. It’s very scary.
BatGuano wrote:
Sicilian?
You’re breaking my heart. You’re shaking my confidence, daily…
BatGuano wrote:
Christie said he agrees with him on 98% of the issues.
BatGuano wrote:
And he has stated he “Christie” agrees with Cuomo 98% of the time!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I said Sicilian not Cecilia!
Rodan wrote:
Then read this essay.
Rodan wrote:
I can’t see anyone using a gun control platform as radical as his to gain national office.
Yes, he’ll have the backing of the MSM and Hollywood, but 2/3 of the country opposes his position. And unlike abortion, which is a hypothetical for most people, gun control is not.
Rodan wrote:
He denies it, but what the hell.
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/chris-christie-i-agree-with-andrew-cuomo-on-probably-98-of-the-issues/
heysoos wrote:
It’s been happening for years as it is.
The abortion lobby just gets its allies in the media to keep it quiet.
@ lobo91:
I hope you are right. Cuomo is scary. When I saw his Gun speech, it really frightened me.
@ BatGuano:
Obama has already set a precedent for left-wing politicians to simply deny having said things even when confronted with videotape evidence.
Marxist, Fascist, “what does it mater”?
Rodan wrote:
Cuomo is to the left of Obama and Feinstein’s current position, which is opposed by something like 68% of the country.
I can’t see it getting him anywhere.
If they want to turn the 2016 election into a referendum on the Second Amendment, let them. We might actually have a chance of winning that one, rather than who can pass out the most free stuff.
@ Rodan:
If the Republicans run competant opposition, Cuomo is unelectible. He i stoo far out of the main stream of American political thought to have a chance. But Obama was likewaise outside of the mainstream of political thought, and he won two elections because the GOP declined to field competant opposition for him. One thing Cuomo has going against him is that he’s white. That’s going to hurt him in a head-to-head matchup with any of the minority heavy hitters in the Donk Party.
lobo91 wrote:
Another example of how how Obama has damaged this country. He has not only lowered the bar he has put it on the ground.
Cuomo is a tool.
Like Soetoro.
OT -- I wish the laundromat had a beer machine.
@ lobo91:
All the money that goes to Planned Parenthood effectively pays for abortions. Money is fungible. Even if they technically use the money for other things, it is freeing up cash to pay for abortions. Planned Parenthood is Big Abortion. And they make plenty of money assuring that more black babies aren’t born into this world. Just like Margaret Sanger wanted.
@ Iron Fist:
Exactly.
And they get a lot of tax dollars. Not just from the feds, but most states, as well.
@ Iron Fist:
He can play the Sicilian card and claim to be an ethnic minority. Remember this term: “Mediterranean-American.” That could be his way of getting around the White part.
That said, Cuomo is really a scary guy. When I saw his anti gun rant where he said you don’t need 10 bullets to kill a dear, I was scared as hell. The anger in his speech makes Mussolini’s speeches look like they were about love.
This man scares me.
Iron Fist wrote:
Don’t you wonder if the Black community will ever figure this out.
@ lobo91:
I hope they do, because it would be a sure win for any competent Republican. Their heads are gassed and they feel invincible, so you never know.
Stupid on multiple levels.
First, it goes back to what I said yesterday about crime on college campuses being deliberately underreported, despite a federal law requiring it.
Second, rape isn’t the only crime women have to worry about.
Finally, most colleges actually allow female students to leave the campus at will. If they live on campus, though, or go someplace directly after leaving class, they still have to be unarmed, because some bureacrats decided that they can’t have a gun.
Good thing nothing ever happens to female college students, though. Greta Van Sustern probably makes up all those cases she covers on her show.
@ Tanker:
They haven’t yet. And we have a public school system that pretty much guarantees that most of them never will.
Tanker wrote:
(emphases added)
Hell yes it’s too much too ask of a D’Rat who wants to destroy Federalism and create a monster ‘one size fits all’ National Government to run a single united state from DC Town.
The States are our last firewall protecting the People from the over reaches of the national government in DC Town. And the D’Rats hate that.
Tanker wrote:
It will never figure it out, unless a Democrat figure emerges with the welfare of that community in mind. It is unlikely because the dems want to keep poor, uneducated blacks poor and uneducated. As long as they vote democrat. Which they will.
@ lobo91:
I instantly reject any dialog that begins with, “how many, what size, who needs”
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Even the State Firewall is crumbling.
Republicans are losing the battle against big government in state capitals now, too.
Rodan wrote:
Make that “So-Silly Yawn.”
For those who thought that Kerry would be a disaster as Secretary of State, he hasn’t disappointed:
So, by trying to slow the rampant growth of spending that we’ll never be able to pay back, Republicans are sending the wrong message to other countries that are in similar situations?
Rodan wrote:
There will be no help coming from the Blue States since they have sold their souls to DC Town for a few pieces of silver.
@ lobo91:
Has the Russian FM returned Sec. of Ketchup Kerry’s call yet??
Didn’t think so…
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest…
Da_Beerfreak wrote:
Actually, yes, he did. On Sunday, which was 7 days after he called.
@ lobo91:
I guess Kerry doesn’t have to worry about being taken seriously as a diplomat, regardless of what happens with our budget.
The Russians already showed what they think of him.
@ lobo91:
I see your jacka$$, and raise you one schmuck
New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said Wednesday that Chuck Hagel “almost had tears in his eyes” as he explained to the former Nebraska senator that the expression “Jewish lobby” is rooted in a negative depiction of Jews.
lobo91 wrote:
That’s what I get for trying to be snarky…
citizen_q wrote:
Crocodiles cry, too.
And while Hagel “almost” had tears in his eyes, he had genuine—not “almost”—cash in his pockets from friends of Iran and Hezbollah.
@ lobo91:
When I wonder will Kerry be making a speech about the hacking and stealing of America’s trade secrets, military information and personal information by the Chinese?
I’m thinking …. oh, never.
@ lobo91:
Didn’t the Chinese give hillary essentially the same treatment?
Luv how our elitist leaders are so eager to step on their constituents, yet so meekly accept such shoddy treatment.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Oh and it turns out that story by Ben Shapiro WAS true about Hagel getting money from Hamas. My, my, my, looks like Jazzy Ponytail backed the wrong horse AGAIN.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Also from some group called friends of hamm-a$$, or so I’ve heard.
@ Da_Beerfreak:
Some Red States are doing so as well.
@ lobo91:
That main is a joke.
OT. Gold and silver are truly getting into a buy range for those with any savings left after the FED again tells us there’s been no inflation.
Rodan wrote:
There’s no doubt that too many States are doing it and in the long run if not stopped will lead to the complete destruction of Federalism in a few more years. That’s exactly what the D’Rats want.
@ yenta-fada:
Just ignore food costs and its all gravy!
Rodan wrote:
And energy
Also OT. A cautionary lol regarding the perils of bilingualism.
Mississippi ratifies 13th amendment abolishing slavery … 147 years lateAcademics prompt ratification after noticing that 1995 move to accept amendment detailed in Lincoln had not been completed
Rodan wrote:
They stripped out food and energy from the Consumer Price Index at least 20 years ago. It’s almost like it was planned….
@ yenta-fada:
Of course it was. Can’t tell people the truth.
@ lobo91:
Print 80 billion a month and the result is higher fuel costs.
@ yenta-fada:
@ Rodan:
Same kind of sophistry is used reporting unemployment.
@ Guggi:
How are things in Austria?
citizen_q wrote:
That’s a fancy word for bullshit.
Rodan wrote:
Not to mention burning food for fuel raising food prices.
@ Rodan:
My son works in a “bargain” grocery. I shop at the higher end (sorry, my bigoted Southern head is fed up dealing with the EBT crowd who let their brats run around the store like it’s playground).
In the past, his store was not all that crowded, except for the EBT crowd. Now, he tell me that they’re busy all hours of the day and when I go shopping at my store, it’s not nearly as busy. More importantly, he says they’ve started getting higher numbers of the “after work” crowd (his store is one block from the transit commute hub), where they used to take the time to go to Raley’s over the overpass.
@ citizen_q:
Yup Corn ethanol is just stupid.
Rodan wrote:
That 80 billion goes right into derivatives. There’s no effect whatsoever on the economy. It doesn’t even support the banking system. It just keeps the banks at the roulette tables.
Here are some of the headlines from a military newsletter I receive:
But hey, it’s not all bad:
@ yenta-fada:
true, I’m always trying to live down my Southern MD public school education. /
@ Carolina Girl:
The fact that even Wallmart’s latest earnings report was down shows you that people are not able to buy the basics.
Right on cue:
lobo91 wrote:
It is no accident that they have first gone after the Military. It is so disturbing.
yenta-fada wrote:
Obviously, the answer is to give WalMart employees a big raise.
@ lobo91:
Another one who’s never held an honest job in her life who will get rich telling us how to live our lives.
@ yenta-fada:
They’re going after all of the bastions of traditional society.
Can’t “fundamentally transform” America without tearing down the existing society, after all.
citizen_q wrote:
Blame the Republicans.
http://rumfordmeteor.com/?p=9518
@ yenta-fada:
LOL
Sadly, if you send that to MSNBC, they’ll probably run it as a real story.
Here’s another one that’s not mine:
“Participating in a gun buy back program because you believe that the criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you believe that the neighbors have too many kids.”
lobo91 wrote:
We can always hope that they would.
@ lobo91:
There are moments I could kill Rush for calling her a slut. Not that she didn’t deserve it, but now we can’t get rid of her. She still believes she has a place on the national stage.
Meanwhile, she couldn’t even wrangle 20 people to a personal appearance in Nevada. In a parking lot. And I think 10 of those in attendance were shoppers who wandered over to see if there were free samples being given out.
Some good news!
Al-Qaeda ambushes Hizb’Allah patrol in South Lebanon
@ yenta-fada:
Trying to make it sound like it BOTHERS them they’re having to cut the military is nothing more than salesmanship.
@ Carolina Girl:
Who would want a free sample of her?
//
Rodan wrote:
moar!
I didn’t want to watch her on TV for free. Why would I pay to hear her?
Carolina Girl wrote:
And of course showing video of Obama promising to do just that back in 2008 would be racist.
Carolina Girl wrote:
The D’Rats needed a replacement for Cindy Sheehan; now they have one.
Rodan wrote:
Serves the bastards right! Faster, please.
@ BatGuano:
I hate both of them. I hope they do suicide bombings against each other.
yenta-fada wrote:
In MD they were not supposed to track or have such a database, but during the Beltway Sniper attacks, the police were going to gun owner’s homes asking for their ARs. The information on who had a regulated firearm is not supposed to be retained after processing. Not sure if they went to individual FFLs to get that info. From the discussions I have seen on the subject, I don’t think they did.
Anyhow, when someone asks about my firearms instead of claiming losing them in a tragic boating accident, I am considering just saying I gave them all up at one of those no questions asked gun turn ins.
No, this is not from The Onion:
@ lobo91:
How many will be to oil ticks like her hubby? One could almost think quid pro quo. /
@ citizen_q:
I can pretty much guarantee you that they didn’t. FFLs maintain their sale records in hard copy form, in a bound ledger.
They’d still be looking today if they went to all of them and looked through their records.
citizen_q wrote:
And the Chinese.
Rodan wrote:
Yep, let them keep doing as muslims do, murder as long as they keep it amongst themselves.
My local news (NBC affiliate) is pushing Christie for 2016 already.
We are being fed the sh*t sandwich again.
@ Bumr50:
Yup and I know some here will disagree with me, but he could get the nomination. Rubio, Rand Paul and JIndal all can split the Conservative/Libertarian vote. Christie will go hard right on one issue to win part of the base over. Then in the general election, the Democrats will destroy Chris Christie.
I have seen this movie before (2000 -- Bush,2008 -- McCain,2012 -- Romney)
lobo91 wrote:
Interesting…I’m listening to Patsy Cline singing “Love’s Litter’s in the Sandra” right now.
Boy, we really missed out by not having her as Secretary of State…
//
Bumr50 wrote:
the MSM is gonna get us all killed…they are the enemy of ALL the people
lobo91 wrote:
proof that image is more important than lives…I’d like to knock that bitch into next month
@ Rodan:
@ heysoos:
The idea of a Christie nomination needs to be treated as a joke.
It does us no good to have “serious” arguments as to why Christie is a bad nominee.
That’s exactly what they want.
lobo91 wrote:
Still pushing the party line after being played the chump?
How are the demonrats not like organized crime? They must really take care of their soldiers as long as they remain loyal and follow orders.
citizen_q wrote:
this is govt service, well paid for…
I tell ya, something is gonna blow
Be back later, good evening everyone.
@ citizen_q:
There is no difference between the Chicago wing of the Democrats, who are currently running our government, and organized crime.
lobo91 wrote:
complete with a Don, underboss, capos and soldiers….it’s the exact same thing
heysoos wrote:
The Fifth Column Treasonous Media is just the tip of the iceberg of Government indoctrination/propaganda operation being conducted against the free thinking People of America.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Are you sure that’s not ” Love letters in the sand” ?
BatGuano wrote:
In this case, yes…
the donks have the media, entertainment, and public schools in their pocket…I’m beyond jaded
Nothing to see here…move along…
heysoos wrote:
well that sucks up to a point… but when the shit hits the fan they own it and there is nowhere to hide.
lobo91 wrote:
tell me again I forgot… Obama was raised in a what?
this many.
yenta-fada wrote:
But copper, brass and lead have jumped in price…at least together.
The Osprey wrote:
/and that is Obama’s brilliant deficit reduction plan! The gubermint buys up all the ammo and then sells it back to us at a huge profit!
comrade, you are not smiling?
lobo91 wrote:
She would have been a disaster, but look at what we ended up with; John Fool Kerry who starts his SOS career by yammering about global warming. The whole world is laughing.
huckfunn wrote:
she should be horse whipped for her latest outburst…rarely have I ever heard anything so cold and callous…I’d like to impose about 50k in dental work upon her heartless face, and she deserves worse
new threat. its art, its history, its real men doing ‘real man’ things.
heysoos wrote:
As Groucho once said “I’d horse whip you if I had a horse”.
huckfunn wrote:
in a way it is good, we have to hit bottom before we can rise…
brookly red wrote:
A barn, from the way he puts his feet on the White House furniture…
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Nooo, think again. starts with an M as in muslim…
huckfunn wrote:
heh…good one
I get pissed
@ lobo91:
That’s right Rice. The real tragedy in all this was denying you the position of Secretary of State. How could any of us have forgotten that four dead Americans, including our Ambassador, pales in comparison to the embarrassment you and the rest of that criminal enterprise of an Administration must have felt having to be DRAGGED kicking and screaming to Capitol Hill to answer for your effing incompetence?
Also not from The Onion:
Carolina Girl wrote:
preach it…I’m starting to actually foam…never heard anything so base in my life
Carolina Girl wrote:
I am still not convinced it was incompetence… I still say left out to dry, set up. show me I am wrong.
J & G Sales and renowned manufacturer Barrett have joined the boycott of vendors and manufacturers refusing to sell anything to NY state government agencies that they cannot also sell to NY state citizens.
Mike C. wrote:
heh…who’s your big brother now?
@ Mike C.:
I don’t see law enforcement needing anything Barrett makes, anyway.
They have no use for any sort of ultra-long range sniper rifles in any caliber, and certainly not .50 BMG. Typical LE “sniper” engagements are at less than 200 yards.
Mike C. wrote:
the worm is turning, the people are rejecting the tyrants
@ brookly red:
That’s the one thing that REALLY makes my blood boil -- those goons at State watching it live like it’s an action movie download from Netflix.
And there were five survivors. Why hasn’t ANYONE heard from them??
lobo91 wrote:
good grief, that’s not the point bro…think positive once in a while
Tourism to North Korea is Booming!
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100203666/north-korea-claims-tourism-is-booming-from-one-iranian-nuclear-scientist-a-year-to-two/
@ Carolina Girl:
There’s no phone service at the outpost in Outer Mongolia where they were transferred?
lobo91 wrote:
/have you seen the rats in the Bronx lately? like mini cooper’s with greasy fur.
brookly red wrote:
not too sure, but could be…the problem with the donk agenda is that they make nothing, produce nothing and stand for nothing…they rob a finite well…it has to come to a head
lobo91 wrote:
5 million quatloos says the NYPD and the state police already have some. Police departments in CA sure did, and Barrett voided all their warrenties and refused all requests for factory repair work.
@ heysoos:
You apparently missed my point.
Regardless of whether or not they have any justifiable need for such things, they do buy them, along with surplus APCs and all sorts of other hardware they shouldn’t have.
Anything that limits their access to those things is a plus.
Carolina Girl wrote:
you already know the answer… there were not supposed to be any survivors. look up my comments the first night, they were set up, but why?
Mike C. wrote:
Barrett is trying to contribute…pointing out all the possible road blocks dulls the spirit
@ Mike C.:
Oh, I’m sure they do, along with surplus M113s and all sorts of other stuff they don’t need.
Mike C. wrote:
well yes they do… I wonder if that ban includes the state militia?
lobo91 wrote:
your ‘point’ is easily diluted into ho hum…why don’t you give some credit for attitude instead of constantly pointing out fire arms tactics…
@ brookly red:
Barrett’s ban also includes federal government office in NY state. In other words, if the citizens can’t buy it, they don’t sell it to anybody in NY. J&G Sales and several others have said the same thing.
@ heysoos:
I apologize for occasionally bringing facts into the discussion here.
Mike C. wrote:
You know I live in NY and I think the rest of the country needs to bitch slap us a bit. I would like to see soft drink companies embargo us for example…
anytime any manufacturer denies doing business to an anti 2nd Amendment idealists, I consider a very good thing…bitch and moan ABOUT DETAILS
ch and moan thAT IT WON’T WORKlobo91 wrote:
why back off?…it’s not about facts in this world, it’s about attitude…pick a fight and fight it…you find fault too often
@ brookly red:
It wouldn’t be the first time something like that happened.
About 10 years ago, Maryland passed a law mandating that all handguns sold in the state beginning in the following year had to include technology that would prevent anyone other than the registered owner from firing them. Never mind the fact that no such technology existed at the time (or does today, for that matter).
As the deadline approached, all the gun manufacturers notified FFLs in the state that they wouldn’t be shipping any new products to them.
The state repealed the law pretty quickly after than.
brookly red wrote:
heh…pretty funny…it’s like trans regional tho, the crazyness is almost everywhere…so many screaming tards…we may have to hire the Chinese to update our crowd control
306 county sheriffs and 10 state sheriffs associations have now pledged that they will not enforce laws that encroach on the 2nd amendment.
@ heysoos:
I’m not picking a damn thing. You are.
You know what? Add yourself to the list of people who can ignore my comments, and I’ll do the same with yours.
lobo91 wrote:
it’s hardly come to that within 4 posts…how may I serve you?
lobo91 wrote:
see the worm is turning… If Phillip Morris said 7 dollars a pack tax on cigarettes? we won’t sell in your state the boston tea party would look like a 5 yrs olds BD a chucky cheese.
lobo91 wrote:
relax dude, Barrett’s stance is a good thing technically efficient or not… the task is at hand and only unity will save the day.
@ brookly red:
I’m really hoping that Magpul moves out of state once our legislature finishes passing their new magazine ban.
They inserted an exemption for manufacturers because they don’t want to lose those jobs, but they should leave the state anyway.
huckfunn wrote:
Cali and Ill are huge.
@ brookly red:
Where did I say anything about “efficiency”?
The short version of what I said was “Good. They don’t need them anyway.”
@ brookly red:
I’m a fan of lobo’s facts, as well as his military service.
@ lobo91:
agreed, it’s the principle…go just over the Kansas line and set up shop again…if I were a billionaire I’d front them the money, just say bill me
brookly red wrote:
Percentage-wise, New Mexico is winning with 32 of 33 sheriffs signing.
Video is a wonderful thing:
Bringing this up would probably be considered racist or something…
Morons.
lobo91 wrote:
I hear you it’s just that we have so little good news for the sake of morale let it be?
@ brookly red:
For the sake of my own morale, I could do without some of the mindless sniping.
Maybe it’s time for me to find a different forum, anyway.
say what you want…the Chinese aren’t stupid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unocjGOPRUM
lobo91 wrote:
well the way I see it we need to cut spending & Sequester is like snipping up Obama’s credit card which any sane chapter 11 court would do… now if we need to find more funding for defense we can take it from social programs.
brookly red wrote:
I eagerly await the the Sequestion From Hell..I’m already medievil
hey what do we need more health care for illegals, or a Navy? sometimes you gotta make the hard choices.
brookly red wrote:
Unfortunately, an awful lot of people would pick the former.
lobo91 wrote:
well let’s put it to the test shall we? historically guns win over butter every time.
@ brookly red:
We’ve always had relatively sane people in charge before, though.
lobo91 wrote:
so shall we surrender?
New Thread.
@ brookly red:
I’m not planning to, but then, I took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
@ 119 huckfunn: Susan Rice was a minority hire in the bad sense of the words.
darkwords wrote:
There’s a good sense?
Guggi wrote:
Fact is, once an amendment has been ratified, there is no need for the few remaining states to take any position on it. It’s already the law of the land.
This is just media posturing.
I sure as HELL wish that more people would concern themselves more with human trafficking in the 21st century, in the present, in which we can take action against the (mostly Muslim) perps, rather than with human trafficking in the 19th century, in which nothing can be done because it’s in the past.
It’s been said that the Devil gets us to fret about the past and worry about the future, to keep us from doing God’s work in the present.
lobo91 wrote:
Please stay here.