British Marxist and Islamist sympathizer George Galloway shows his Jew Hatred and cowardice. In an Oxford University debate about Israel, Galloway walked out after he discovered one of the participants was Israeli. He then revealed his racist colors.
George Galloway, a British lawmaker known for his anti-Israel positions and support of Hamas, caused a minor uproar at Oxford University when he abruptly left a debate after realizing his opponent is Israeli.
“I have been misled,” said Galloway when Eylon Aslan-Levy, an Israeli student, confessed his nationality.
[....]
“I don’t debate with Israelis,” Galloway said, got up hurriedly, got his coat, and stormed out.
Upon leaving he reiterated: “I don’t recognize Israel and I don’t debate with Israelis.”
George Galloway is a racist and a coward.
Syrian War Porn: Al-Qaeda bombs Syrian Party HQ.
A massive car bomb explosion in the Syrian capital, Damascus, has killed at least 53 people and injured another 200, reports say.
Syria blamed “terrorist groups linked to al-Qaeda” for the blast, which hit a central district near the headquarters of Syria’s ruling Baath Party.
TV pictures showed images of bodies, wrecked cars and shattered windows.
The violence comes as Russia and the Arab League say they want to broker direct government-opposition talks.
No group has yet admitted the attack.
The Syrian foreign ministry blamed the bombing on “armed terrorist groups linked to al-Qaeda that receive financial and logistic help from abroad”.
The militant Islamist al-Nusra Front previously said it had carried out many of the bombings that have rocked Syria since the uprising began in March 2011
In even better news, Syrian Rebels and al-Qaeda have launched attacks against Hizb’Allah both in Syria and Lebanon.
Syrian al-Qaeda (AL Nusra Front) Fighters.
Hizb’Allah mourns dead fighter from clash with al-Qaeda.
Syrian rebels have reportedly bombed two compounds operated by the Lebanese terror organization Hezbollah, the main Syrian opposition group announced Thursday.
The Free Syrian Army (FSA) claims its forces bombed Hezbollah facilities in Lebanon and Syria, a cross-border raid that indicates the rebels’ desire to increase their attacks on allies of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Assad gave sanctuary to al-Qaeda during the Iraq War. Now they have turned their guns on his regime and their former allies Hizb’Allah. I am enjoying this conflict with a passion.
Tags: al Nusra Front, Arab Spring, Bashar Assad, Popular Uprising, Syrian War
Bad guys vs. bad guys, sit back and enjoy the show.
Target rich environment.
I think that George Galloway is a 21st century William Joyce, aka Lord Haw-Haw.
George Galloway, Purim and the Legacy of Amalek
According to this, human language may have evolved from birdsong. Better tweet that.
@ Speranza:
See also David Horowitz: Unholy Alliance -- Radical Islam and the American Left.
Moe Katz wrote:
This is a wet dream, 2 nasty organizations fighting.
Iron Fist wrote:
These are 2 evil organizations who have now turned one each other.
Moe Katz wrote:
Radical Islam would destroy the Left.
Kudos to George Galloway for letting the Left’s full Israel hatred show
Speranza wrote:
In the blink of an eye. Like they did in Iran after the revolution.
@ Speranza:
Eventually, to be sure. BUt the Left thinks they can use Radical Islam and Radical Islam knows they can use the Left. They both think they can discard the other when they are through with them, but if it comes to it my money is on Islam destroying the Left. They will only do that after they have thoroughly beaten us, though. The Left is too good a vehicle for America’s defeat for Islam to turn on it until we are beaten.
@ Moe Katz:
@ Rodan:
Please pass the Popcorn, please!
Jay Nordlinger of National Review has these interesting excerpts form Elliot Abrams new book “Tested by Zion”
I despise George H.W. Bush! Even though I voted for him in 1988 and 1992 I was not unduly upset when he lost.
@ Iron Fist:
The Left should take note AQ vs. HA fight. They were once allies, now mortal foes. How can they trust any Islamic group?
@ Speranza:
Poppy Bush is the reason the GOP is the mess it is today. His Acolytes run the party. He’s a loser.
@ Rodan:
Oh, the Left doesn’t trust them. Theyjust think that they can betray them first. The Left are anti-American scum. Nothing matters more to them than bringing down America, not even division of the spoils.
Rodan wrote:
He is a mediocrity. W. was far superior and I have issues with him.
@ Speranza:
@ Speranza:
Excellent links.
Much as I despise George Galloway and all his works, I do admire him for one thing: for uncompromisingly and forthrightly stating his position in all its vileness.
Would that the supporters of Israel—and Jews in general—were so uncompromising. Israel and its supporters continually quibble with each other, and importune those who want their destruction, by asking whether Israel really must lop off its arm at the shoulder or whether lopping it off at the elbow will do.
Israel needs to stand up, with its supporters, and unilaterally recognize Jordan as the only legitimate “Palestinian Arab” state, and endorse unequivocally its recognition of the “Palestinian right of return”—to Jordan only, and the sooner the better.
@ Speranza:
I have big issues with W. The truth is the last 2 Republcian Presidents were failures.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I would NEVER admire ANYONE who is that fucking EVIL. Especially George Galloway!
@ Rodan:
@ Speranza:
This is a consequence of allowing “ruling families” and “seniority” to determine the hierarchy of the party that ostensibly represents conservative values.
Rodan wrote:
If they had not been failures, there would still be a Republican president.
Not only have the Republicans adopted the short-money palooka stance generally; they have bought into the notion that it is right and proper for there to be a switch back and forth between one party gaining an electoral majority and then the other party doing so; “So we lose,” they think, “We’ll get our turn in no more than eight years.” The Democrats do not think this way; they have adopted the O’Brien Plan, from 1984—”If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.” The Democrats are not playing switch-off every eight years; they are trying to consolidate a permanent one-party victory. That the Republicans are not even considering this as a possibility, let alone a strategy, tells you what time-servers they are.
Macker wrote:
Never said I admired him. I said I admired his willingness to lay out his position, the consequences be damned.
Israel and its supporters need to do that; the world respects strength. In point of fact, in Moses’ final address to the Children of Israel in Deuteronomy, he says this quite forthrightly; that if they observe the commandments ten thousand will flee before one of them, whereas if they do not ten thousand of them will flee before a single foe.
Israel has played John Boehner to the Arabs’ Obama.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Britain is not a hospitable place for Jews.
The true nature of Hezbollah: Ariel Ben Solomon in the Jerusalem Post.
Speranza wrote:
Never really has been. Not to mention their behavior during the Mandate.
Speranza wrote:
Hasn’t been since the Hugh of Lincoln blood libel and the York massacre, though it has been nominally better at times.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Trading Jews for Muslims i snot a good move. They will wish that Britain had more Jews in a few decades.
Speranza wrote:
You can say that again!
@ Speranza:
I suspect they’re wishing Britain had a few more Britons right the hell now…
@ Rodan:
Yeah, I don’t really get that. Reagan was the last real winner we had in the White House, but devotees of Reagan are ostracized. Followers of Bush run the show. It makes no sense unless you speculate as I do that these people don’t really care if they win elections or not so long as they get all the right invites to all the right parties, the perks, and the privileges. All they really care about is their place in the Ruling Class of America, and they could care less if the Country burns down in the process.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
I did a post on this. Republicans think they are one Austerlitz away from total political victory. The Democrats take Mao’s People’s war long term strategy to politics.
@ Iron Fist:
That is my opinion as well!
Speranza wrote:
The Jews who came to the UK built businesses. The Muslims who come to the UK—look at this Choudary as an example—are looking to suck the system dry.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
“Social” and “economic justice” REQUIRE that we take things away from “some” to give to other “somes.”
Mike C. wrote:
AInt that the truth.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
What the Muslims want to do is remake Britain.
@ Bumr50:
“WE” being the royal, global, all-powerful “WE.”
Mike C. wrote:
I have a thread in pending about the “white flight” from London.
@ Speranza:
I met a couple of Brits who said they would take our Illegal Mexican/Central Americans any day over their Muslim Immigrants.
@ Speranza:
The problem are not the Black British in this case. Its the Muzz.
Iron Fist wrote:
After 1988 the Bushies took over in an internal coup.
Rodan wrote:
You are correct.
Rodan wrote:
British Muslims are generally a bad lot.
@ Speranza:
The fact Karl Rove blew 400 Million and is still respected by the Republican Party shows the power of the Bush clan.
Rodan wrote:
It is getting rather bad over there and too many people over here don’t understand or know what is going on.
Bumr50 wrote:
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”
—Rudyard Kipling, “The Gods of the Copybook Headings”
Note, by the way, the beauty of this stanza. “Carboniferous Epoch” is not merely a play on the terms of prehistoric periods, but a slap at the coalminers’ unions which in Kipling’s time were exerting a stranglehold on the economy. And given Al Gore and his “carbon credits,” it is equally barbed in our own day. The play on “robbing Peter to pay Paul” to elegantly done, too—and slaps the OWS ideology of today no less than the Leftism that obtained when it was written.
Rodan wrote:
But there are only 330 million people in the country! And he didn’t call me!
@ Lily:
Yeah in The UK both Whites and Blacks are being harassed by the Muzz. Its a different dynamic than here. Black British feel and act British. The Muzz do not.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
OMG!
@ Rodan:
No they don’t … and isn’t there no-go zones too in Britian?
@ Lily:
Yes there is with Sharia Law courts. east London is occupied territory. But in all honesty, the Brits brought this upon themselves. The British Elite going back to Queen Elizabeth being a Turkish lackey and puppet have always loved the Muzz. They view The Muzz as allies against Catholic and Orthodox Countries.
Churchill to his credit, did not share this view and hated Islam. The average British despises Islam, but their elites have a historical soft spot for it.
@ Rodan:
America’s elites of both Parties love Islam as well.
@ Rodan:
Which makes no sense….because it isn’t the Catholic’s and Orthodox that are the problem.
Rodan wrote:
Which again makes no sense…they kill nearly 3000 innocents and yet here it is the Christians that are always hated. It is the Christians that are radicals …. yet when you bring up Islam they say it was only a few radicals..just like Christians have. It is rather surreal.
Rodan wrote:
He has been appearing more and more on Fox -- almost every other night.
@ Lily:
Back in the late 1500′s The English Protestants hated Catholic Spain, so they viewed Islamic Turkey as their ally. Later on, The British backed the Islamic Turks against Orthodox Russia. Then the British supported the Arabs over the Israelis.
Let me be clear, I am talking about the British Elite and not the British people who do not like Islam.
Anyone know what’s going on with Bob in Brecknridge?
@ Lily:
You have Conservatives who to this day still support Al-Qaeda and Hizballah against the Serbians. Many Conservatives are willing to go to war to help Muslims. Its madness and something I will never understand.
@ Speranza:
He’s a LOSER and treated with respect. He probably will blow the 2014 election and still be respected. he’s a loser like Trump said.
Rodan wrote:
Not really. That was the French under Francis I (King of France 1519 -47).
@ Rodan:
I understood you were talking about the British elite…the normal people of Britian.
Rodan wrote:
He’s a Republican,not a Conservative and his “Conservative Victory Project” PAC is designed to mislead people.
OT
Sandra Fluke opines that the military should accept transsexual recruits…
Here’s my vagina, here is my dick
I can’t decide which one I should pick
Sound off…
@ Speranza:
The French also were Muzz allies.
Lily wrote:
The British people are being screwed over by their Elites.
Rodan wrote:
Since DeGaulle came to power in 1958, French foreign policy has been decidedly pro Arab/Islamic.
Rodan wrote:
It isn’t understandable to be honest and one doesn’t have to stop there to call out the craziness..it is all over the board on how so many Christians and conservatives have given up their core belief’s. It really isn’t understandable. Sort of like trying to empty the ocean out with a spoon.
Rodan wrote:
More evidence of the special bond between the British and the American people…
@ Speranza:
He’s also an expert of picking some wedge issue and getting Republcian voters distracted. I do not dismiss the possibility of Jeb Bush getting the nomination. He will pick some Social issue and go hard Right on it to win over enough voters in the primary. The Bush family are experts at that.
Rodan wrote:
A lot of regular people on this planet are being screwed over by the elites. It’s a phase I’m not sure where it’s headed to be honest…in these uncertian times it really is hard to predict which way the wind will blow. Just when you think you understand or have a handle on things ….oops! Nope you are wrong. (talking about myself here)
Lily wrote:
Caroline Glick thinks the “normal people of Britain” tolerate anti-Semitsm if not passively concur with it.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Oh my!!!
/but you nailed it.
@ Lily:
To me Serbia is a litmus test like Israel. How can anyone claim to be against Islamic terror and support Islamic terrorists over a Christian people? This Blog, Weasal Zippers, jihad Watch and Atlas Shrugged are the only Conservative Blogs who support the Serbs over the Muzz. The other blogs like Hot Air, Ace of Spades and others still claim AL-Qaeda and Hizballah were good guys against Serbia. That is why I have no respect for thsoe other Conservative blogs.
Rodan wrote:
I kinda of left out *the NOT normal people of Britian*…darn keyboard.
Rodan wrote:
I don’t underestimate them but I find it hard to believe that they are stupid enough to think that the people want to go for the Bush brand name ever again.
@ Speranza:
The EDL whom Charles and the British press label as Neo Nazis support Israel. Some Nazis, huh?
@ Speranza:
This is the Republican Party we are talking about. They are the Stupid Party for a reason.
@ Rodan:
Ah…and that is nasty subject to which a lot of people don’t clearly understand very well.
@ Lily:
To me it is simple. Christian vs.Muslims.
Speranza wrote:
“Jew” has been a term of abuse in Britain for centuries. In the US, the term “act like a white man” (implication, “not like a n*gger”) was a commonplace until the era of the civil rights movement.
In the UK, “act like a Christian” (implication, “not like a Jew”) never really went out of use. Casual side-slaps at Jews are found throughout British literature; John Lennon referred to someone as a “slimy little Jew” in one of his books of verse. Going into debt and having to approach a moneylender was called “going to the Jews.”
Even if this sort of terminology went out among the British elite (and frankly, it never did), terms of this sort tend to hang on in less-elite circles, just as it is common to find people in America who, immune from the elite impulse towards PC language, still casually refer to black people as “n*ggers” in the course of conversation.
@ Speranza:
Well I stand corrected on the normal people of Britian who some do tend to lean anti-Jewish…
/I honestly don’t understand the craziness of it all. You would think after WWII..but then again there is nothing new under the sun.
Rodan wrote:
A moniker they have well deserved.
Lily wrote:
WWII for too many people is as distant a memory as the Napoleonic Wars.
Rodan wrote:
Well to be honest once you pull everything away and are down to the bone. It is really Jewish/Christians vs. Muslims.
Rodan wrote:
Charles thinks the boy scouts are Nazis.
@ Lily:
I view it even deeper, It’s Humans vs. Islam. I caught hell in the early days here because I rooted for China to crush the Muslim Uighurs. I support anyone against Islam.
To paraphrase Churchill, If the Devil was fighting Muslims, I would say nice things about him.
Speranza wrote:
A lesson that wasn’t learned..again through the hard way.
It truly is a shame how ignorant too many people are on history. I don’t expect them to be scholars…but at least a simple understanding of history would do for me…yet I find much more ignorance than even any knowledge of history..the history they do spew is distorted and changes depending on what day it is.
@ Speranza:
He thinks Big Tobacco is behind everything.
@ Speranza:
We are 4 generations removed from that conflict. Not many people in 1913 were discussing a war from the 1840′s.
Rodan wrote:
Well I’m not going to give you hell over it right now (have cardio rehab in just a bit) but I’ll politily disagree with you here. Nothing …and I do mean no good could come from fighting evil with evil. Doesn’t work..maybe at the surface..but it doesn’t last long. All you are doing is trading one horrific evil for a possible more horrific evil and that Rodan is the truth.
@ Lily:
The elites of America and UK have a soft spot for Islam. Until that is changes, nothing will improve vis a vis Islam.
If a Catholic Country was fighting a Muslim country, the US and UK would back the Islamic country. You can take that to bank.
Rodan wrote:
It’s not quite that simple.
There are neo-Nazis that support Israel for the same reason the American Nazi Party supported the Nation of Islam during the civil rights movement. The NOI opposed the civil rights efforts of Martin Luther King, and in the 1960s was demanding that the US government cede several states to American blacks to set up an all-black Bantustan. The Nazis supported this because they, like the NOI, opposed integration and wanted the blacks out.
Some Nazi types do support Israel for the same reason; they want a place to send the Jews to get them out of [insert name of country here]. Whether they hope to then exterminate them, or trust to the Arabs to do the job, is beside the point; they are pro-Israel not because they are pro-Jewish, but because they are anti-Jewish.
They also resent the fact that Israel is organized as an ethnic nation-state even as they see the transnational Left eroding nationalism and ethnic pride in their own countries—and they support Israel because they figure if the Jews can have an ethnic nation-state, they should be able to have one too, and support for Israel will file the rough edges over any Nazi sympathies within their ranks.
There is also the historical anomaly, if you will, that Israel was, after all, built by Leftists, many of whom were non- and in some cases anti-religious; so there is, if you will, at least a superficial similarity between some of the Leftist-ethnic nationalist Zionists and the Leftist, ethnic-nationalist Nazis. This comparison fails in that the Zionists were not racist or genocidal, but there is a superficial basis for comparison.
@ Lily:
I am being rhetorical and not literal. Allah is the Devil. The “god” of Islam is not the same God Jews and Christians worship.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Yes I have encountered some Nazis/White Supremacists who do support Israel.
Rodan wrote:
Clearly, he is biased against our proud Native American heritage.
@ Rodan:
True. allah isn’t anything in heaven for sure..if not the devil a demon. To fight it though we are gonna have to find a way to not become them to defeat them.
Rodan wrote:
Another one of his many “bogey men du jour”. Next week it will be Little League Baseball.
Speaking of LGF -- it appears that Gus802 is in icejimmah’s crosshairs. The over/under for his banning should be Memorial Day.
Rodan wrote:
Of course!!! And I’ll even bet you that some Catholic’s will be on the wrong side. Which is so wrong.
@ Lily:
That’s a tough one.
@ Speranza:
Don’t give him ideas!
In a war between an Islamic nation and a non Islamic nation -- Obama/Kerry/Brennan/Hagel/Hillary -- instinctively take the Islamic nations side.
Rodan wrote:
True..but it is the truth.
Rodan wrote:
That furtive mind of his would have come up with it on his own.
Speranza wrote:
I would add McCain, Lindsey Graham and The Bush Clan to that list.
I’m off work due to some illness that I hesitate to call the flu, and am listening to Glenn Beck for the first time in probably a year and a half.
He’s really going off on having at least one serious, viable candidate in lieu of Christie within the next 100 days, or else he feels strongly that we will be stuck with him.
Not a huge fan, but this has some merit.
Gotta go! Have a good day all!
Rodan wrote:
Ain’t that the truth.
@ Bumr50:
Addendum -- four years ago I said I would NEVER vote for Mitt Romney.
Just ask my wife.
Bumr50 wrote:
We ahve several good candidates and the fat man is not one of them.
Susana Martinez, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, Bob McDonnell (not Bobby Jindal).
Bumr50 wrote:
For all his faults Mitt Romney is a fine man and would have made a far superior POTUS to the Fraud-in-Chief we now have.
Rodan wrote:
Yep. May they both lose; painfully.
Speranza wrote:
Aslan-Levy should have mocked him as a coward and a pussy as he left.
@ Speranza:
My rationale for bucking Romney had more to do with bucking the GOP hierarchy than Romney himself.
We need more than a list when the GOPowers that be coronate their man, be it the Corpulent Governor or some other prog.
Leftists are united in their efforts to rebuild America within a globalist framework.
“We” are nowhere near as united.
@ Speranza:
The sad part is a segment of the Republcian voters would do all they can to sink Martinez or Rubio. I see the hatred directed at them on a daily basis on other Conservative blogs. The same hatred I saw against Giuliani in 07/08.
@ Alberta Oil Peon:
he’s a coward and a racist. Galloway showed what he really is.
Galloway would be one of the first to be killed if the communists or Muslims ever took over.
Rodan wrote:
Pathetic assholes. We don;t need them in the GOP.
Rodan wrote:
ironically, all those names are catholic.
makes ya go hmmmmm……
coldwarrior wrote:
Ethnic Catholic.
Rodan wrote:
He is really a traitor.
Alberta Oil Peon wrote:
Christopher Hitchens would have devastated him (Galloway).
George Galloway’s fit of antisemitic pique may have backfired for his cause. The Oxford Student Union was going to vote for boycott, disinvestment; etc. of the Jewish state, but Galloway’s revolting behavior put a damper on those evil plans: See the third story down within this link.