First time visitor? Learn more.

Newt Gingrich takes apart Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens

by Rodan ( 164 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Elections 2016, Mitt Romney, Republican Party at February 26th, 2013 - 12:00 pm

Say what you want about Newt Gingrich but unlike other Republican analysts, he lives in reality. During his Presidential run, he warned Republicans that if they do not start to appeal to a broader electorate, they would lose. he unfortunately ended up be right. Despite his prophetic warning, many Republican establishment types like Karl Rove and Mitt Romney’s consultant Stuart Stevens continue to live in a delusional world.

Karl Rove a man who blew 400 million in 2012 and had nothing to show for it has decided to go to war against the “Tea Party.” What Rove misses is that movement is dead as it was hijacked by others with ulterior motives ( example: Sharon Angle) and the media’s demonization of the movement because of the hijackers, who probably were false flag operatives. What Rove really wants to do is play political boss and keep his stranglehold on the Republican Party. Never in the history of humanity has an organization given so much power to a man who blew 400 Million dollars!

Stuart Stevens is another establishment buffoon. As Romney campaign manager, who writes off sections of the electorate and this created a backlash against Romney. Stuart did not realize the demographics have changed and tried to appeal to this new electorate. He also misled Romney on strategy and lied using phony data. Mitt Romney went into election night, thinking he had won because of Stuart’s lies.

Newt Gingrich eviscerates Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens over their outdated views of the electorate and political strategies.

First, Rove.

I am unalterably opposed to a bunch of billionaires financing a boss to pick candidates in 50 states. This is the opposite of the Republican tradition of freedom and grassroots small town conservatism

[....]

However there are going to be some very powerful opponents to any serious rethinking of Republican doctrines and strategies. It is appalling how little some Republican consultants have learned from the 2012 defeat. It is even more disturbing how arrogant their plans for the future are.

Of course these consultants have made an amazing amount of money asserting an expertise they clearly don’t have. They have existed in a system in which the candidate was supposed to focus on raising money and the smart consultant would design the strategy, spend the money and do the thinking.

[....]

While Rove would like to argue his “national nomination machine” will protect Republicans from candidates like those who failed in Missouri and Indiana, that isn’t the bigger story.

Republicans lost winnable senate races in Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Florida. So in seven of the nine losing races, the Rove model has no candidate-based explanation for failure.  Our problems are deeper and more complex than candidates.

Handing millions to Washington based consultants to destroy the candidates they dislike and nominate the candidates they do like is an invitation to cronyism, favoritism and corruption

[....]

Stuart Stevens represents a very different problem. Based on our time together on This Week on ABC last Sunday, it seems he is indifferent to the facts and has no sense of responsibility for a presidential campaign that he dominated. Jonathan Karl did a great job drawing out some amazing opinions.

On the disastrous Romney collapse among Latino voters (it was worse, by the way, with Asian Americans), Stuart responded as though the campaign were irrelevant.

[....]

The Romney campaign decision to savage first Governor Perry and then me on immigration destroyed any chance to build a Latino-Asian appeal. The Romney formula of self-deportation (which must have seemed clever when invented) led to a collapse of acceptability. The most powerful Obama ad in Spanish language media was Romney talking about self deportation.

The fact that Stevens can’t acknowledge any of this tells you how hard it will be for some in the consultant class to learn anything about winning in the 21st century.

Newt Gingrich is spot on and he hints at something I have suspected. The 2012 Republican Presidential campaign was really a money making scam by washed up Consultants. Both Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens, deceived their candidates and Conservatives voters that Republicans were going to win in 2012. They published crappy polls and ignored real ones that showed Obama with a lead and the true makeup of the electorate.

This attitude of denial about the election and polls did not just mislead Romney, Republican voters were misled. Talk Show radio hosts and Conservative blogs (not this one), lied to their listeners and readers. They told their audience to ignore the polls and that Romney was a cinch to win. This led to the creation of the stupid unskewed polls website which was run by a con artist and was promoted by many Conservative blogs. Too many Conservatives were kept in a bubble to the reality of the election. This bubble was created by Republican consultants like Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens who deceived Romney and Republican voters.

Despite Newt Gingrich’s observations, nothing much has changed since November 6th 2012. Karl Rove is still powerful and many Republicans are denial. Because of this, we are on the verge of a one Party Country where the Democrats will win every Presidential election for the next few cycles. If the GOP does not change its strategy and tactics, they will become irrelevant and could well vanish as a Party after 2016. One way to begin to change is to purge losers like Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens. Until this happens, Republicans will keep losing and Americans do not like losers.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

164 Responses to “Newt Gingrich takes apart Karl Rove and Stuart Stevens”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | February 26, 2013 12:50 pm

    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…


  2. yenta-fada
    2 | February 26, 2013 12:56 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…

    Something I’ve been wanting to ask you, OT. How many gallons are in a “barrel” of oil? U.S. gallons or Imperial gallons?


  3. yenta-fada
    3 | February 26, 2013 12:57 pm

    From up here, I don’t know who Stuart Stevens is. Hard for me to get into the topic. Sorry.


  4. Speranza
    4 | February 26, 2013 12:58 pm

    Rove is a pig.


  5. Speranza
    5 | February 26, 2013 12:59 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    From up here, I don’t know who Stuart Stevens is. Hard for me to get into the topic. Sorry.

    Well now you know who he is. He was the hapless campaign adviser to Romney.


  6. lobo91
    6 | February 26, 2013 1:00 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…
    Something I’ve been wanting to ask you, OT. How many gallons are in a “barrel” of oil? U.S. gallons or Imperial gallons?

    42 gallons


  7. 7 | February 26, 2013 1:02 pm

    The Consultant Class don’t really care about pushing an agenda, or even winning. They care about keeping the fat paychecks coming to themselves. Why anyone would trust Rove or Stevens after all of this is beyond me. Rove showed how useless his line of thinking is in this last election. It isn’t like he won big. Sarah Palin has a better track record of picking winners than Karl Rove does.


  8. Speranza
    8 | February 26, 2013 1:03 pm

    Romney’s dopey son saying that his dad never really wanted to run was like a major kick to the shins to those of us who contributed to him.


  9. lobo91
    9 | February 26, 2013 1:05 pm

    Ashley Judd Compared Mountaintop Mining To The Rwandan Genocide, Bush To Attila The Hun, Slammed Christianity As Sexist…

    Yeah…those positions will sell real well in Kentucky…
    //


  10. 10 | February 26, 2013 1:08 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…
    Something I’ve been wanting to ask you, OT. How many gallons are in a “barrel” of oil? U.S. gallons or Imperial gallons?

    42 US gallons.


  11. citizen_q
    11 | February 26, 2013 1:28 pm

    Speranza wrote:

    Romney’s dopey son saying that his dad never really wanted to run was like a major kick to the shins to those of us who contributed to him.

    I often wonder if much of the GOP are there to simply give the appearance of a choice. Guess I am getting grumpy and cynical as I age.


  12. eaglesoars
    12 | February 26, 2013 1:31 pm

    It’s not clear how Rove and Stevens ‘lied’. I believe they used bad models, thinking that the 2008 models would not apply -- as it turned out they obviously did. I can think of 2 analysts who got it right -- Scott Rasmussen and Larry Sabato.

    But it is clear to me that Stevens is a dissembler. The other day when he denied any media bias against Romney was a whopper. If he actually believes that he has no business near a campaign for dog catcher. But he doesn’t believe it. He’s just trying to stay in the good graces of the MSM.

    And lest we forget 2 of the most malicious establishment republicans, Steve Schwartz who was McCain’s campaign manager and Nicole Wallace, McCain’s communications director. Both undermined Sarah Palin with the MSM and didn’t give a rat’s ass what it did to their candidate.


  13. yenta-fada
    13 | February 26, 2013 1:42 pm

    @ lobo91:
    @ Mike C.:

    Thanks!


  14. eaglesoars
    14 | February 26, 2013 1:43 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    check yer mail gurl


  15. 15 | February 26, 2013 1:59 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace are two other vile creatures. They are still trashing Palin.


  16. brookly red
    16 | February 26, 2013 2:00 pm

    Mike C. wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…
    Something I’ve been wanting to ask you, OT. How many gallons are in a “barrel” of oil? U.S. gallons or Imperial gallons?

    42 US gallons.

    Huh, did not know that… I assumed 55 as like a 55 gallon oil drum.


  17. 17 | February 26, 2013 2:01 pm

    @ citizen_q:

    I often wonder if much of the GOP are there to simply give the appearance of a choice

    .

    You are not alone.


  18. 18 | February 26, 2013 2:02 pm

    @ lobo91:

    She’s on her way to a win!
    ////

    She’s in the wrong state. Maybe she can convince Dianne Feinstein to give up her seat in 2016 and run in Cali.


  19. eaglesoars
    19 | February 26, 2013 2:03 pm

    more chores -- gotta hop


  20. brookly red
    20 | February 26, 2013 2:04 pm

    citizen_q wrote:

    Speranza wrote:

    Romney’s dopey son saying that his dad never really wanted to run was like a major kick to the shins to those of us who contributed to him.

    I often wonder if much of the GOP are there to simply give the appearance of a choice. Guess I am getting grumpy and cynical as I age.

    well look how they responded to the T-party… kinda leaves no doubt.


  21. 21 | February 26, 2013 2:05 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    The Consultant Class don’t really care about pushing an agenda, or even winning. They care about keeping the fat paychecks coming to themselves. Why anyone would trust Rove or Stevens after all of this is beyond me. Rove showed how useless his line of thinking is in this last election. It isn’t like he won big. Sarah Palin has a better track record of picking winners than Karl Rove does.

    You got it, the Consultant Class are a bunch of scam artists who swindled Republican voters out of money.


  22. 22 | February 26, 2013 2:07 pm

    @ brookly red:

    They hijacked it and destroyed it.


  23. brookly red
    23 | February 26, 2013 2:11 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ brookly red:

    They hijacked it and destroyed it.

    hijacked yes, destroyed? I am not sure… it might come back in search of braaaains. Literally.


  24. yenta-fada
    24 | February 26, 2013 2:13 pm

    eaglesoars wrote:

    @ yenta-fada:
    check yer mail gurl

    Yes! Replied.


  25. Speranza
    25 | February 26, 2013 2:14 pm

    eaglesoars wrote:

    And lest we forget 2 of the most malicious establishment republicans, Steve Schwartz who was McCain’s campaign manager and Nicole Wallace, McCain’s communications director. Both undermined Sarah Palin with the MSM and didn’t give a rat’s ass what it did to their candidate.

    Nicolle (two “l’s” by the way) Wallace is a real *****.


  26. 26 | February 26, 2013 2:15 pm

    @ Speranza:

    She’s a nasty backstabber. I despise her.


  27. 27 | February 26, 2013 2:29 pm

    @ brookly red:

    In retrospect the Tea Party should have organized, come up with a platform and go 3rd party. But it’s all crying over spilled milk.


  28. yenta-fada
    28 | February 26, 2013 2:36 pm

    Romney would not have had an essentially different foreign policy.

    October 10, 2012, -- 5:07 pm

    Romney: “I’ll Recommit US to Goal of Palestinian State, Fund/Arm Syrian Rebels” & Other Obama-esque BS


  29. 29 | February 26, 2013 2:38 pm

    yenta-fada wrote:

    Romney would not have had an essentially different foreign policy.
    October 10, 2012, — 5:07 pm
    Romney: “I’ll Recommit US to Goal of Palestinian State, Fund/Arm Syrian Rebels” & Other Obama-esque BS

    Part of the reason romney lose was becasue he supported going to war over Syria. I had 5 coworkers who told me they did not vote for Romney over that.

    Republicans need to drop the nation building democracy spreading garbage.


  30. yenta-fada
    30 | February 26, 2013 2:38 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ brookly red:
    In retrospect the Tea Party should have organized, come up with a platform and go 3rd party. But it’s all crying over spilled milk.

    The Tea Party would be the scapegoat along with the Republicans no matter how much they organized. They don’t have the money/media/race
    machine.


  31. brookly red
  32. 32 | February 26, 2013 2:41 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    In retrospect, Romney did little to distinguish himself from Obama. He felt (because his consultants told him so) that all he hasd to do was provide a credible picture of him as President, and Obama’s negatives would destroy him. That simply did not happen. Much of that was because the media was point man and lap dog for Obama. There were any number of scandals that should have brought Obama down, but the media soft-peddled them. Likewise, the unemployment numbers alone should have destroyed Obama. The unemployed slackers of the Millinal Generation showed up in droves to vote for the man most responsible for their unemployment. They’ve accepted this as the best deal that they can get.


  33. yenta-fada
    33 | February 26, 2013 2:42 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Most U.S. politicians seem like they would be fine with Sharia Law in the U.S. They aren’t keen on ‘nation building’ in their own nation.


  34. yenta-fada
    34 | February 26, 2013 2:46 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    yenta-fada wrote:
    Other Obama-esque BS
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/26/illegal-immigrants-released-detention-centers-sequ/ grrrrrr…

    From the article,

    “Over the last week, ICE has reviewed several hundred cases and placed these individuals on methods of supervision less costly than detention,”

    hahahahahahaha. What comes after cynical?


  35. 35 | February 26, 2013 2:47 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    Mike C. wrote:
    yenta-fada wrote:
    Mike C. wrote:
    Dang. Slow time of day. Maybe a signpost below might help…
    Something I’ve been wanting to ask you, OT. How many gallons are in a “barrel” of oil? U.S. gallons or Imperial gallons?
    42 US gallons.
    Huh, did not know that… I assumed 55 as like a 55 gallon oil drum.

    55 gallon drums are the common standard for many chemicals these days. But oil “barrels” were standardized back when barrels were still, well, barrels (made of wood), and oil was actualy bought, sold and shipped in them. That’s been a while.


  36. 36 | February 26, 2013 2:59 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    Most US politicians have no problem sending Americans overseas to die for the Caliphate.


  37. 37 | February 26, 2013 3:02 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    You the difference between Republican Consultants and Democrat Consultants? The Democrat Consultants believe in winning at all costs and actually believe in their cuase. The Republican Consulatnts just want a paycheck.

    That’s the difference. Newt reallly exposed that.


  38. BatGuano
    38 | February 26, 2013 3:02 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Republicans need to drop the nation building democracy spreading garbage.

    Republicans cannot impose democracy in the middle east mainly because the middle east doesn’t want it. They want to choose their oppressors.


  39. brookly red
    39 | February 26, 2013 3:05 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    They want to choose their oppressors.

    I think we may have caught some of that too…


  40. BatGuano
    40 | February 26, 2013 3:06 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Republicans cannot impose democracy in the middle east mainly because the middle east doesn’t want it. They want to choose their oppressors.

    Actually, that sounds like a paradoxical statement.


  41. BatGuano
    41 | February 26, 2013 3:09 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    I think we may have caught some of that too…

    Now that you mention it, I think we caught a ****load of it.


  42. 42 | February 26, 2013 3:10 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Not really. Islamic Democracy == One man, one vote, one time. Look at how long the Palestinians have gone without an election, yet we give in to the fiction that they are a functioning government, legitimate, and all that. Of course, when the Palestinians vote, they vote for terrorists. Like you said, choosing their oppressors. That’s all they want.


  43. 43 | February 26, 2013 3:10 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Exactly and I for the life of me why the GOP hangs onto this braindead idea. Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya should be proof.


  44. brookly red
    44 | February 26, 2013 3:12 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ BatGuano:

    Exactly and I for the life of me why the GOP hangs onto this braindead idea. Iraq, Afhanistan and Libya should be proof.

    the only thing I can think of is there must be money to be made somehow.


  45. 45 | February 26, 2013 3:17 pm

    @ brookly red:

    Yup and some payoffs from Qatar and the House of Saud.


  46. citizen_q
    46 | February 26, 2013 3:21 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    It is the natural order of things under islam.

    Sooner or later it reverts back to from. Look at turkey.


  47. BatGuano
    47 | February 26, 2013 3:25 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    up and some payoffs from Qatar and the House of Saud.

    George bush hearts the house of saud.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0R6QFwKWFpA


  48. 48 | February 26, 2013 3:31 pm

    Okay, here’s your feel-good story of the day…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284542/Art-Bouvier-Man-spots-Jhaqueil-Reagan-walking-10-miles-job-interview-gives-job.html?offset=0&max=100

    The sad thing is having to read about it in a British newspaper.

    Hat tip -- rayra at GCP


  49. 49 | February 26, 2013 3:32 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Both him and Poppy were just saudi Subsidiaries.


  50. BatGuano
    50 | February 26, 2013 3:36 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Both him and Poppy were just saudi Subsidiaries.

    Wholly owned. But I would love to have either one of them in the white house now rather than this travesty of a president.


  51. 51 | February 26, 2013 3:40 pm

    Finance Comittee endorsed Lew. That’s really no surprise. Oh, and some cowardly RINOs backed out of filibustering Hagel. I didn’t see whether John McCain was one of them, but it wouldn’t surprise me. He went after Hagel so that when his resistance collapsed, there’d be no on eleft to resist.


  52. brookly red
    52 | February 26, 2013 3:41 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    Both him and Poppy were just saudi Subsidiaries.

    Wholly owned. But I would love to have either one of them in the white house now rather than this travesty of a president.

    shit I would take Klinton back over 0


  53. 53 | February 26, 2013 3:44 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Want to bet the GOP caves on Sequester?


  54. lobo91
    54 | February 26, 2013 3:46 pm

    @ yenta-fada:

    From the article,

    “Over the last week, ICE has reviewed several hundred cases and placed these individuals on methods of supervision less costly than detention,”

    hahahahahahaha. What comes after cynical?

    Hey, it worked really well when they tried it with Obama’s uncle, back in the late ’70s.

    I hear he has another deportation hearing scheduled for sometime in December. Unless they push it back due to the sequester.

    Or he doesn’t show up.


  55. heysoos
    55 | February 26, 2013 3:47 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    BatGuano wrote:
    Rodan wrote:
    Both him and Poppy were just saudi Subsidiaries.
    Wholly owned. But I would love to have either one of them in the white house now rather than this travesty of a president.

    shit I would take Klinton back over 0

    hell yes…Clinton actually liked leading and playing politics, and he was generally a good enough POTUS…it’s the arrogance and malicious nature of BO that pisses people off…other than that he has no political skills at all


  56. BatGuano
    56 | February 26, 2013 3:47 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    Finance Comittee endorsed Lew. That’s really no surprise. Oh, and some cowardly RINOs backed out of filibustering Hagel. I didn’t see whether John McCain was one of them, but it wouldn’t surprise me. He went after Hagel so that when his resistance collapsed, there’d be no on eleft to resist.

    This would have been a justifiable use of the filibuster: i.e., protect America from a person who can do great harm to our republic. It is more of a question of competence and Hagel is spectacularly incompetent, Although his views on Israel are enough of a reason to reject him.


  57. 57 | February 26, 2013 3:47 pm

    @ Rodan:

    It would be in character for them, but Obama wants sequester. He can cut defense and blame the Republicans. That’s why he proposed it in the first place. We lost the sequester vote when we raised the debt ceiling without substantive cuts. Boehner is useless as tits on a boar hog.


  58. brookly red
    58 | February 26, 2013 3:49 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:

    Wnat to bet the GOP caves on Sequester?

    well Boehner has been warned… http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/02/26/sen_ron_johnson_if_boehner_caves_he_will_lose_his_speakership.html


  59. brookly red
    59 | February 26, 2013 3:51 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    other than that he has no political skills at all

    actually he has all the skills of Mao Zedong

    (note the complete absence of a sarc tag)


  60. BatGuano
    60 | February 26, 2013 3:52 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Wnat to bet the GOP caves on Sequester?

    They will cave, with some kind of “face saving” fiction. Me? Let the sequester begin!


  61. brookly red
    61 | February 26, 2013 3:52 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ Rodan:

    It would be in character for them, but Obama wants sequester. He can cut defense and blame the Republicans. That’s why he proposed it in the first place. We lost the sequester vote when we raised the debt ceiling without substantive cuts. Boehner is useless as tits on a boar hog.

    we could have a freaky situation… imagine if Boehner caves and Zero doesn’t accept it


  62. heysoos
    62 | February 26, 2013 3:53 pm

    I think Boehner with stand up this time…and it’s really not entirely his choice, by principle anyhow


  63. brookly red
    63 | February 26, 2013 3:54 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    Wnat to bet the GOP caves on Sequester?

    They will cave, with some kind of “face saving” fiction. Me? Let the sequester begin!

    if we have 10 sequesters it will start to resemble what these jerks were sent to Washington to do in the first place


  64. 64 | February 26, 2013 3:55 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Its a win win for Obama. Sequester goes through he blames Republicans for for “kids not getting vaccines” and if the GOP caves, he looks like a winner.


  65. brookly red
    65 | February 26, 2013 3:56 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    I think Boehner with stand up this time…and it’s really not entirely his choice, by principle anyhow

    I think you may be right sooner or latter O has to lose one


  66. BatGuano
    66 | February 26, 2013 3:57 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    if we have 10 sequesters it will start to resemble what these jerks were sent to Washington to do in the first place

    F****** A bubba. Well told!


  67. brookly red
    67 | February 26, 2013 3:57 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:

    Its a win win for Obama. Sequester goes through he blames Republicans for for “kids not getting vaccines” and if the GOP caves, he looks like a winner.

    ironic that his base are anti vacsers


  68. heysoos
    68 | February 26, 2013 4:00 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    I think Boehner with stand up this time…and it’s really not entirely his choice, by principle anyhow

    I think you may be right sooner or latter O has to lose one

    he’s got his own words, J Carney disputed BO’s claim, Woodward is on it…I can’t help but think BO can’t dodge this one…if Rodan’s right, that’s it for me…I’ll disown the whole thing and never vote again…I have my limits to being played for a stooge


  69. Bumr50
    69 | February 26, 2013 4:02 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    Wnat to bet the GOP caves on Sequester?


  70. lobo91
    70 | February 26, 2013 4:03 pm

    House Dems File Bill To Create Federal “Department of Peacebuilding”…

    Not from The Onion…


  71. 71 | February 26, 2013 4:04 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Yup, I do not have a problem with cutting the military either. We use it to fight for Islam. Our troops deserve betetr and I would rather we cut the military so we do not send Americans to do for Islamic interests.

    I am tired of Americans dying for Muzz.


  72. 72 | February 26, 2013 4:05 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    House Dems File Bill To Create Federal “Department of Peacebuilding”…
    Not from The Onion…

    I heard that, :lol: !


  73. heysoos
  74. brookly red
    74 | February 26, 2013 4:06 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    if we have 10 sequesters it will start to resemble what these jerks were sent to Washington to do in the first place

    F****** A bubba. Well told!

    well yes… I get the idea that people forget that gubermint spending is the problem and we elected these mooks to reign it in.


  75. BatGuano
    75 | February 26, 2013 4:07 pm

    @ lobo91:
    There is not enough marijuana in the world to get this through. At least we know what the first director would look like.


  76. 76 | February 26, 2013 4:07 pm

    @ heysoos:

    I am already voting for the Libertarians in 2014 in Florida’s local elections. If they cave on Sequester, I will vote even for the Libertarians in 2014 at the Federal level.

    They have caved too much.


  77. heysoos
    77 | February 26, 2013 4:08 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    House Dems File Bill To Create Federal “Department of Peacebuilding”…
    Not from The Onion…
    I heard that, !

    that’s an example of BO’s “leaner, more more effective govt”


  78. 78 | February 26, 2013 4:08 pm

    @ Bumr50:

    It’s their speciality.


  79. lobo91
    79 | February 26, 2013 4:11 pm

    More scare tactics:

    Obama Admin Warns Sequester Could Hinder Gun Control…

    All sides say they want better enforcement of current gun laws, but law enforcement officials are warning the budget cuts looming at the end of this week would be a major setback to those efforts — and could end up putting more guns in the hands of criminals.

    This one might even seem plausible, to people who don’t know better.

    First, this administration almost never investigates or prosecutes anyone for violations of federal gun laws as it is, so I doubt that anyone would notice a reduction.

    And second, the idea that criminals buy guns from dealers is a joke. Since its inception almost 20 years ago, the NICS system has resulted in only a handful of actual prohibited persons being caught trying to buy a gun. Almost all of the tens of thousands of rejections they like to mention were “false positives” that were later allowed to proceed.


  80. BatGuano
    80 | February 26, 2013 4:13 pm

    Rodan wrote:

    I am tired of Americans dying for Muzz.

    I was all for war in Afghanistan. I was skeptical of Iraq. I am dead set against another American dieing in either of those medieval hell holes. We should have been out while George the second was still in office.We should leave immediately with a warning: Do not make us come back!


  81. brookly red
    81 | February 26, 2013 4:13 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    this is interesting…
    http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/26/left-wing-group-urges-obama-to-shut-down-campaign-group/

    Re: “If President Obama is serious about his often-expressed desire to rein in big money in politics, he should shut down Organizing for Action and disavow any plan to schedule regular meetings with its major donors,” said Bob Edgar, president of Common Cause, which helped pass the 2002 campaign finance law.

    I speak fluent democrat please allow me to translate for Mr. Edgar… Ahem, ” Are you fuckin crazy!11!1 we are all going to end up in fuckin prison !1!1!!”


  82. heysoos
    82 | February 26, 2013 4:13 pm

    @ heysoos:
    Jay Carney on the OFA…
    ““It will not be engaged in political campaign-related activities … [but] has been organized to rally support for the president’s policy agenda,” he claimed.”

    that’s some Hall Of Fame doubletalk….needs moar nuance?


  83. lobo91
    83 | February 26, 2013 4:14 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    There is not enough marijuana in the world to get this through. At least we know what the first director would look like.

    Dennis Kucinich repeatedly proposed such a thing over the years, as well.

    Basically, they just want to add an automatic “no” vote on the NSC.

    I guess they forgot that we already have one, with Obama.


  84. Bumr50
    84 | February 26, 2013 4:14 pm

    @ lobo91:

    We already have one, when used properly.

    It’s called the Department of Defense.

    Att. PA residents:

    ‘Honoring Our Veterans’ License Plates Now Available, Says English 2/26/2013
    HARRISBURG – Pennsylvanians can demonstrate their support for the state’s servicemen and women with an “Honoring Our Veterans” license plate now available from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), Rep. Hal English (R-Allegheny) said today.

    “This is a wonderful way to pay tribute to our men and women in uniform here in the Commonwealth, and across the nation,” said English.

    The plate was authorized by Act 194 of 2012. It features an American flag and a bald eagle with the words “Honoring Our Veterans.”

    The cost of the license plate is $35, with $15 from the sale of each plate dedicated to the Veterans Trust Fund. The trust fund is administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs to provide grants to veterans service organizations and other charitable organizations.


  85. citizen_q
    85 | February 26, 2013 4:14 pm

    @ lobo91:
    My G-d! What a sicking and ultimately dangerous brew of naivety and delusion.


  86. brookly red
    86 | February 26, 2013 4:16 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Rodan wrote:

    I am tired of Americans dying for Muzz.

    I was all for war in Afghanistan. I was skeptical of Iraq. I am dead set against another American dieing in either of those medieval hell holes. We should have been out while George the second was still in office.We should leave immediately with a warning: Do not make us come back vaporize your asses!

    minor edit.


  87. lobo91
    87 | February 26, 2013 4:17 pm

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    My G-d! What a sicking and ultimately dangerous brew of naivety and delusion.

    I particularly like the description of what they want it to be in charge of. Everything from international conflicts to stopping school bullying.

    Because those two topics obviously go together…


  88. brookly red
    88 | February 26, 2013 4:19 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    citizen_q wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    My G-d! What a sicking and ultimately dangerous brew of naivety and delusion.

    I particularly like the description of what they want it to be in charge of. Everything from international conflicts to stopping school bullying.

    Because those two topics obviously go together…

    well yes the do… the weak always get beat up and have their shit stolen.


  89. BatGuano
    89 | February 26, 2013 4:19 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    minor edit.

    Shhh! That is what I meant.


  90. lobo91
    90 | February 26, 2013 4:20 pm

    Looks like John Kerry has already assumed that role:

    Kerry To American Diplomats: “We Are Also Citizens Of The World”…


  91. heysoos
  92. brookly red
    92 | February 26, 2013 4:22 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    minor edit.

    Shhh! That is what I meant.

    see I would have said, “if you don’t knock it off I am drop a bomb so big on you yo mama’s teeth are gonna be found in Australia”


  93. eaglesoars
    93 | February 26, 2013 4:25 pm

    Oh, please, God, make it stop.

    Santorum Heads to Iowa


  94. 94 | February 26, 2013 4:26 pm

    @ heysoos:

    Most transparent in history!
    ///


  95. 95 | February 26, 2013 4:27 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Remember Global test?


  96. brookly red
    96 | February 26, 2013 4:27 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Looks like John Kerry has already assumed that role:

    Kerry To American Diplomats: “We Are Also Citizens Of The World”…

    well if Benghazi has a sliver lining it is that’s O’s cronies are not exactly falling over themselves to get a chushy diplomatic assignment.


  97. 97 | February 26, 2013 4:29 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Santorum needs outside intervention.


  98. brookly red
    98 | February 26, 2013 4:29 pm

    eaglesoars wrote:

    Oh, please, God, make it stop.

    Santorum Heads to Iowa

    /isn’t a santourm where they send crazy people?


  99. 99 | February 26, 2013 4:30 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Spot on!


  100. 100 | February 26, 2013 4:30 pm

    @ brookly red:

    He’s a Socialist scumbag. He is using Social issues to trick Conservatives.


  101. BatGuano
    101 | February 26, 2013 4:31 pm

    I’m sure you have all heard La Hood, Napolitano, Obama et al., describe what would happen if the sequester occurs. We all have been in positions in our jobs where we were given difficult tasks: Increase production this much; cut costs this much; reduce over-time this much; reduce maintenance costs this much, etc. We did not have the luxury of saying, “We can’t do it and and all hell will break loose.”
    We just did it.


  102. heysoos
    102 | February 26, 2013 4:31 pm

    arm bloodthirsty Muslims in Lybia, for no apparent benefit to the US…
    disarm law abiding American citizens minding their own business…
    why would ANYBODY be okay with this?


  103. BatGuano
    103 | February 26, 2013 4:33 pm

    @ lobo91:
    Didn’t take him long.


  104. lobo91
    104 | February 26, 2013 4:34 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    That’s the difference between us and them.

    Competence.


  105. heysoos
    105 | February 26, 2013 4:34 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    I’m sure you have all heard La Hood, Napolitano, Obama et al., describe what would happen if the sequester occurs. We all have been in positions in our jobs where we were given difficult tasks: Increase production this much; cut costs this much; reduce over-time this much; reduce maintenance costs this much, etc. We did not have the luxury of saying, “We can’t do it and and all hell will break loose.”
    We just did it.

    if you’re running a multi trillion dollar business and can’t find 2.4% to cut the budget, you should immediately fired for incompetence


  106. brookly red
    106 | February 26, 2013 4:35 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    I’m sure you have all heard La Hood, Napolitano, Obama et al., describe what would happen if the sequester occurs. We all have been in positions in our jobs where we were given difficult tasks: Increase production this much; cut costs this much; reduce over-time this much; reduce maintenance costs this much, etc. We did not have the luxury of saying, “We can’t do it and and all hell will break loose.”
    We just did it.

    minor difference… it was our own money.


  107. lobo91
    107 | February 26, 2013 4:36 pm

    And the hits keep coming…

    Federal Appeals Court Rules Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Is Unconstitutional…


  108. Bumr50
    108 | February 26, 2013 4:39 pm

    Sanitorium.

    Leave me be.

    Off to dinner, stay classy my friends!


  109. brookly red
    109 | February 26, 2013 4:45 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    And the hits keep coming…

    Federal Appeals Court Rules Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Is Unconstitutional…

    well by prescient now drug testing employees is unconstitutional too…


  110. BatGuano
    110 | February 26, 2013 4:46 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    And the hits keep coming…
    Federal Appeals Court Rules Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Is Unconstitutional…

    Cripes. I’ve been drug tested many times just to work.


  111. BatGuano
    111 | February 26, 2013 4:48 pm

    @ brookly red:
    GMTA


  112. lobo91
    112 | February 26, 2013 4:53 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    And the hits keep coming…
    Federal Appeals Court Rules Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Is Unconstitutional…
    well by prescient now drug testing employees is unconstitutional too…

    Nope. Different basis.

    Employers can mandate drug testing on the grounds of safety and liability.


  113. brookly red
    113 | February 26, 2013 4:53 pm

    I am gonna run out and play some numbers… anyone got a favorite


  114. brookly red
    114 | February 26, 2013 4:54 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    And the hits keep coming…
    Federal Appeals Court Rules Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Is Unconstitutional…
    well by prescient now drug testing employees is unconstitutional too…

    Nope. Different basis.

    Employers can mandate drug testing on the grounds of safety and liability.

    Raaaacist


  115. lobo91
    115 | February 26, 2013 4:54 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    I am gonna run out and play some numbers… anyone got a favorite

    666 seems a likely choice today…


  116. brookly red
    116 | February 26, 2013 4:55 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    I am gonna run out and play some numbers… anyone got a favorite

    666 seems a likely choice today…

    I was gonna say any but 666


  117. BatGuano
    117 | February 26, 2013 4:55 pm

    42


  118. brookly red
    118 | February 26, 2013 4:56 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    42

    gotta be 3 digit… is 042 OK?


  119. lobo91
    119 | February 26, 2013 4:56 pm

    @ brookly red:

    Raaaacist

    Just the other day some whackjob or other claimed that requiring background checks was racist.


  120. brookly red
    120 | February 26, 2013 4:57 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    @ brookly red:

    Raaaacist

    Just the other day some whackjob or other claimed that requiring background checks was racist.

    /it is… next you will want voter ID.


  121. BatGuano
    121 | February 26, 2013 4:57 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    gotta be 3 digit… is 042 OK?

    Yes.The zero is merely a place holder.


  122. lobo91
    122 | February 26, 2013 4:59 pm

    Here we go:

    Feds say employee background checks are racist

    A federal agency has issued a directive claiming that federal contractors who perform criminal background checks may violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because “racial and ethnic minorities are arrested and convicted at a higher rate than whites.”

    The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued Directive 306, which states that contractors who conduct background checks and exclude job seekers “based upon their criminal history may be discriminatory.”

    The OFCCP even states that contractors who advertise hiring positions for only applicants with “clean records” are in violation of anti-discrimination laws.


  123. brookly red
    123 | February 26, 2013 5:01 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    gotta be 3 digit… is 042 OK?

    Yes.The zero is merely a place holder.

    OK if we win you have a choice. 250 bucks to the charity of your choice or I buy a shitload of ethnic food and send it to Rodan.


  124. lobo91
    124 | February 26, 2013 5:02 pm

    I guess Bill Ayers will be relieved that he doesn’t have to pass a background check:

    Minnesota State University Names Domestic Left-Wing Terrorist Bill Ayers A “Visiting Scholar”


  125. brookly red
    125 | February 26, 2013 5:02 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Here we go:

    Feds say employee background checks are racist

    A federal agency has issued a directive claiming that federal contractors who perform criminal background checks may violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because “racial and ethnic minorities are arrested and convicted at a higher rate than whites.”

    The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued Directive 306, which states that contractors who conduct background checks and exclude job seekers “based upon their criminal history may be discriminatory.”

    The OFCCP even states that contractors who advertise hiring positions for only applicants with “clean records” are in violation of anti-discrimination laws.

    it’s too sick to save… let’s just burn it down.


  126. BatGuano
    126 | February 26, 2013 5:04 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    OK if we win you have a choice. 250 bucks to the charity of your choice or I buy a shitload of ethnic food and send it to Rodan.

    if you giveit to charity it will be eaten up in administrative costs. If you send food to Rodan it will just be eaten. send it to Rodan.


  127. lobo91
    127 | February 26, 2013 5:06 pm

    God…Eric Bolling just said that the GOP should nominate Christie in 2016.


  128. brookly red
    128 | February 26, 2013 5:06 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    OK if we win you have a choice. 250 bucks to the charity of your choice or I buy a shitload of ethnic food and send it to Rodan.

    if you giveit to charity it will be eaten up in administrative costs. If you send food to Rodan it will just be eaten. send it to Rodan.

    let’s win first…


  129. brookly red
    129 | February 26, 2013 5:08 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    God…Eric Bolling just said that the GOP should nominate Christie in 2016.

    fuck him and the horse he rode in on…
    http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/christie_budget_details.html#incart_river_default


  130. citizen_q
    130 | February 26, 2013 5:09 pm

    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.


  131. BatGuano
    131 | February 26, 2013 5:09 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    God…Eric Bolling just said that the GOP should nominate Christie in 2016.

    What Brookly said.


  132. BatGuano
    132 | February 26, 2013 5:11 pm

    citizen_q wrote:

    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.

    God help us all.


  133. citizen_q
    133 | February 26, 2013 5:13 pm

    @ BatGuano:
    The bad news keeps rolling in.


  134. lobo91
    134 | February 26, 2013 5:13 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    citizen_q wrote:
    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.
    God help us all.

    Not like it was a surprise


  135. lobo91
    135 | February 26, 2013 5:16 pm

    Using the sequester for fundraising:

    Gollum On Republicans: “Time To Slap Some Sense Into Them”…

    Since losing the election, Republicans have had steam coming out of their ears.

    And now they’re taking their temper tantrum out on the middle class.

    With this sequester business, they don’t care who loses their job or education or health care as long as President Obama fails. It’s time to slap some sense into them — but you’ve got to act before Thursday’s fundraising deadline.

    48 HOURS LEFT — ALL GIFTS MATCHED: Donate $3 or whatever you can muster today and show Republicans that they can’t keep throwing the world’s biggest temper tantrum.

    They can be sore losers until the cows come home — but they can’t do it at the expense of everyday Americans’ livelihoods and happiness.

    These Republicans only respond to money — so let’s raise a bunch of it and hit them where it hurts.

    http://dccc.org/Call-Them-Out

    C’mon now!

    James Carville


  136. heysoos
    136 | February 26, 2013 5:19 pm

    @ lobo91:
    legal blackmail…bunch of friggin mobsters


  137. lobo91
    137 | February 26, 2013 5:25 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    legal blackmail…bunch of friggin mobsters

    Why expect anything different from this crowd?


  138. Tanker
    138 | February 26, 2013 5:26 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    BatGuano wrote:
    citizen_q wrote:
    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.
    God help us all.
    Not like it was a surprise

    And the supposed future leader for the Repubs Rand Paul voted yes! So much for the righteous little “l” libertarian! Primary all the losers!


  139. lobo91
    139 | February 26, 2013 5:27 pm

    Hagel Confirmed As Defense Secretary…

    Chuck Hagel won confirmation Tuesday to become defense secretary over objections to his views on Middle East security and the administration’s handling of an attack on a U.S. consulate in Libya.

    On a 58 to 41 vote, the Senate confirmed the former GOP senator as four Republicans joined 54 Democrats in approving Hagel, ending a nearly two-month battle that included an unprecedented filibuster against the nominee.

    The four Republican senators voting in favor were Thad Cochran (Miss.), Mike Johanns (Neb.), Richard C. Shelby (Ala.) and Rand Paul (Ky.). All 41 no votes came from Republicans.


  140. brookly red
    140 | February 26, 2013 5:27 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    citizen_q wrote:

    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.

    God help us all.

    not likely… we as a people earned his wrath, it shall be.


  141. 141 | February 26, 2013 5:31 pm

    As I have been saying, there was never any doubt Hagel would be confirmed. Lew is next, and he’ll get confirmed, too.


  142. brookly red
    142 | February 26, 2013 5:31 pm

    Tanker wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:

    BatGuano wrote:
    citizen_q wrote:
    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.
    God help us all.
    Not like it was a surprise

    And the supposed future leader for the Repubs Rand Paul voted yes! So much for the righteous little “l” libertarian! Primary all the losers!

    well it’s looks like full court press time against Israel. I guess we shouldn’t worry about the debt and the deficit this is the end of days.


  143. Da_Beerfreak
    143 | February 26, 2013 5:37 pm

    Chuck Hagel’s Plan for U.S. Forces in ‘Palestine’

    Who would enforce an imposed two state solution according to the recommendations signed off by Hagel? A “U.S.-led multinational force” which would be “under a UN mandate” and “feature American leadership of a NATO force supplemented by Jordanians, Egyptians and Israelis.” Jerusalem would have “a special security and administrative regime of its own.”
    Which is EXACTLY what Samantha Power said before the election.


  144. BatGuano
    144 | February 26, 2013 5:43 pm

    Tanker wrote:

    lobo91 wrote:
    BatGuano wrote:
    citizen_q wrote:
    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.
    God help us all.
    Not like it was a surprise

    And the supposed future leader for the Repubs Rand Paul voted yes! So much for the righteous little “l” libertarian! Primary all the losers!

    Paul and Hagel have the same regard for Israel. which is none.


  145. brookly red
    145 | February 26, 2013 5:43 pm

    Da_Beerfreak wrote:

    ” Jerusalem would have “a special security and administrative regime of its own.”

    yes and so it was written these folks are in for a surprise.


  146. BatGuano
    146 | February 26, 2013 5:44 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Tanker wrote:
    lobo91 wrote:
    BatGuano wrote:
    citizen_q wrote:
    Hannity on his radio show says that hagle was confirmed.
    God help us all.
    Not like it was a surprise
    And the supposed future leader for the Repubs Rand Paul voted yes! So much for the righteous little “l” libertarian! Primary all the losers!

    Paul and Hagel have the same regard for Israel. which is none.

    Like father like son.


  147. brookly red
    147 | February 26, 2013 5:46 pm

    well I guess there is no reason left for Israel not to take out Iran…


  148. BatGuano
    148 | February 26, 2013 5:49 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    well I guess there is no reason left for Israel not to take out Iran…

    Looks like they are on their own.


  149. brookly red
    149 | February 26, 2013 5:51 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    well I guess there is no reason left for Israel not to take out Iran…

    Looks like they are on their own.

    I shall never leave you nor forsake you … not quite alone.


  150. BatGuano
    150 | February 26, 2013 5:53 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    BatGuano wrote:
    brookly red wrote:
    well I guess there is no reason left for Israel not to take out Iran…
    Looks like they are on their own.

    I shall never leave you nor forsake you … not quite alone.

    Touche’!


  151. heysoos
    151 | February 26, 2013 5:55 pm

    WW2.1
    grab your Big Gulp


  152. brookly red
    152 | February 26, 2013 5:58 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    BatGuano wrote:
    brookly red wrote:
    well I guess there is no reason left for Israel not to take out Iran…
    Looks like they are on their own.

    I shall never leave you nor forsake you … not quite alone.

    Touche’!

    I would buy some iodine pills and if you have to ask why, don’t.


  153. BatGuano
    153 | February 26, 2013 5:59 pm

    @ brookly red:
    Say no more.


  154. brookly red
    154 | February 26, 2013 5:59 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    WW2.1
    grab your Big Gulp

    dude I am in NYC…


  155. BatGuano
    155 | February 26, 2013 6:00 pm

    @ brookly red:
    Nurse Bloomberg and all.


  156. BatGuano
    156 | February 26, 2013 6:00 pm

    Nap time.


  157. brookly red
    157 | February 26, 2013 6:01 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    @ brookly red:
    Say no more.

    there is nothing more to say.


  158. heysoos
    158 | February 26, 2013 6:01 pm

    brookly red wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    WW2.1
    grab your Big Gulp

    dude I am in NYC…

    and probably on somebody’s target list


  159. brookly red
    159 | February 26, 2013 6:05 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    brookly red wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    WW2.1
    grab your Big Gulp

    dude I am in NYC…

    and probably on somebody’s target list

    well NYC is hated by the Muzz… a badge of honor. or did you mean me personally? that too I have learned to deal with :)


  160. heysoos
    160 | February 26, 2013 6:25 pm

    Hagel 58-41…blew away the no vote record which was 11 for SecDef…a small thing but he knows he’s not well liked, but he probably gets a far raise


  161. heysoos
    161 | February 26, 2013 6:28 pm

    @ brookly red:
    @ brookly red:
    you’d think there would be more Muslims here in ABQ, mild winters, sunshine and all…but the ones who do live here all work at Sandia Labs inventing then stealing secret weapons tech


  162. 162 | February 26, 2013 9:21 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    They also want to choose who will be the most effective at making life for Jews and Christians…Hell!


  163. Jim
    163 | February 27, 2013 6:38 am

    Good article, but we have an uphill battle with this RINO. The liberal media loves to quote him when he runs down conservative or Tea Party candidates. So all the story’s they write about him won’t have the venom in them like they would if they were writing about a conservative. They’ll make him look like a reasonable man who’s up against an unreasonable, rightwing, racist, low IQ, gun loving, intolerant, Christian mob.


  164. Jim
    164 | February 27, 2013 6:52 am

    Sometimes those closest to you can stab you in the back and not be aware of it. Either that or he’s just another airhead. Everybody has one of those in their family. @ Speranza:


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David