Memo to Roger Ailes: More Pat Caddell’s and less Karl Rove. Nixon was called an Imperial President by Kennedy court historian Arthur Schlesinger, yet Barack Obama can give the Kennedy’s lessons in royalty. Another thing, for whatever their faults JFK and Nixon were patriots. Obama not so much.
by Patrick Caddell
It is not without a bit of irony that, in the 40 years since the explosion of the Watergate story, Bob Woodward would again be under attack from the White House for trying to tell the truth. But this time the attack is coming from a Democrat.
While Barack Obama may not share the Nixon pedigree, he and his White House are the closest thing to the Nixon regime of any that we have seen since then — both in the extent of their paranoia and their willingness to suppress the truth and push the boundaries of law.
In my lifetime, in over 40 years in national politics, Mr. Obama is the only president who comes close to rivaling Richard Nixon for fundamental disingenuousness.
[.......]
As the youngest person on Nixon’s enemies list in 1972, I am particularly sensitive to a White House where they have utter disregard for trampling on dissent and on the rights of individuals.
Since Benghazi, when I raised the alarm about a media that was not only willing to blatantly support one political party or one political a candidate but for the first time seemed willing to suppress or ignore the facts and truth as related to a disaster of American foreign policy, my fear has been that we are now on a slippery slope. Almost everything since then has helped to realize that fear. Chuck Hagel, the sequester, Mr. Obama’s speeches — all of these have revealed a mainstream press that has absolutely decided to wear its bias openly as outriders of the Obama administration. [.........]
What this Woodward, White House sequester battle highlights is the crisis in our democracy. Not so much for what it says about Mr. Obama and his administration but for what it says about the establishment press and all the members of my own party.
During Watergate, there were a number of Republicans who were willing to stand against the president of their party in defense of the United States of America.
Sadly, as as Democrat, I must confess, that today there is no Democratic Senator or member of the House who appears to be willing to publicly put the country ahead of Barack Obama’s White House.
[........]
During the Chuck Hagel confirmation fight, it was revealed that to this day, neither the public nor the Congress know the names of those who were evacuated out of Benghazi. [........]
The White House’s excuse, that this information cannot be revealed because of an FBI investigation, is eerily and frighteningly similar to Nixon telling H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman to “turn off” the Watergate investigation as it threatened national security.
Sadly, it now appears that Director Mueller and the FBI are willing to serve, once again, as an instrument of cover up for an administration — this time following a tragedy in which 4 Americans are now dead.
As much as I have always admired Bob Woodward and admire now him in the sequester fight and for his willingness to take on the White House, I cannot refrain from expressing my disappointment that this man, who did such a service for the country 40 years ago, has essentially taken himself off the boards of the Benghazi fiasco. I wish that if Woodward were to get in a fight, he would do it on an issue that really matters to the safety of the United States.
Tags: Pat Caddell, Richard Nixon, Watergate
This is nothing new. Bill Clinton enjoyed the exact same kind of backing. What this shows us is that the Republicans were mistaken with Nixon. They should have supported their President.
Waiting for Obama to design new uniforms for the White House guards…
Mr. Bubba Clinton is relieved
@ Mike C.:
I’m sure they would be fabulous! Obama is a natural designer, just like he is a Constitutional Lawyer and nuclear physicist…
@ Iron Fist:
Boehner: House will consider any gun measures passed by Senate
@ Rodan:
That is a huge mistake. If the fold on gun control, there really is no purpose in voting Republican. I am most upset. Boehner is useless.
@ Iron Fist:
Of course they will CONSIDER it. Just like Antonio Scalia told Orly Tatiz at one point that he would CONSIDER a petition for cert she had filed in one of her insane birther attempts. I’m sure he gave it at least a couple femtoseconds of thought before putting it in the round file.
@ Iron Fist:
They held on sequester which was a change for once. But if they cave on Gun Control, they are done as a party. It’s bad enough they have nothing to counter OFA and let Obama play them like a fiddle. Guns are the only issue Republicans have credibility on. If they cave, it will be the end of them.
Rodan wrote:
Time for a new party.
@ Mike C.:
I hope you are right. I just don’t trust the Republican Party on guns. The only reason the Assault Rifle ban isn’t still the law of the land is because it had a sunset provision. If it had been left to the Republicans, they’d have never repealed it.
@ The Other Les:
Its getting close to that. Seeing how the GOP is not taking the OFA threat seriously speaks volumes. They are not a serious party.
@ Iron Fist:
I stopped trusting them during the Bush years. Their true colors came out then. I started warming up to them again during the Tea party era, but the cover to Obama during the lame duck session of 2010 and the 2012 process which was joke confirmed to be they are just a strawman for Democrats.
A perfect example, the GOP claims its against terrorism, yet it wants war to help al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood in Syria. That alone should disqualify the party from ever speaking on terror again.
Mike C. wrote:
That was one of Nixon’s more embarrassing moments in 1969 after he came back form Europe trying to emulate the European tradition of guards and in their Napoleonic era uniforms.
Mike C. wrote:
lol and quite true.
Rodan wrote:
I stopped trusting them after that lying sack of shit George Herbert Walker Bush broke his “read my lips, no new taxes” pledge.
@ Speranza:
Yeah, that proposed WH guard uniform had people of all political stripes laughing their asses off from coast to coast. I remember it well…
@ Speranza:
That man destroyed the Republican Party. I can’t believe the amount of respect that Saudi puppet gets from Republicans. Him, his son, that fat pig Jeb are all a bunch of losers.
@ Rodan:
@ Rodan:
I am really suspicious of a good portion of the GOP. A conspiratorial could easily see them as working covertly to aid the demonrats, wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Rodan wrote:
Seems good on it’s face, however the demorats and their compliant media will spin in the admins favour. Did you hear komrad zero already priming the pump to blame slow growth, or any economic hit on the sequester and all the Republican’s fault. Them media will eat it up and offer no countervailing augment.
@ citizen_q:
OFA is the key to the Democrat message power. The Republicans have no answer to OFA. This is huge con job.
@ citizen_q:
Nah I think they are arrogant and living in the past. The GOP thinks people should vote for them and they do nothing win votes.
Rodan wrote:
The Republicans perpetually have their finger up their collective ass.
Rodan wrote:
I cannot stand the sight of them. W. is the best of them and he gave us that “Islam is a religion of peace” crap.
@ Speranza:
The Republican Party is not living in reality. They live in a bubble.
@ Speranza:
W lied to Americans and said Muslims wanted freedom and democracy. As we have seen, events have proved him a liar.
Rodan wrote:
Add stupid, incapable of learning, rigid, and I guess I am closer to your position.
Problem is I don’t think these are stupid people, so perhaps arrogance is the deciding factor and not malevolence.
Speranza wrote:
That weakened the chair considerably for me. Allowing Afghanistan to wite a constitution compliant with sharia kicked the legs out the chair. Doing the same in iraq confirmed it.
Rodan wrote:
“Liar” or more naivete?
citizen_q wrote:
And now President Maliki of Iraq is getting friendly with Iran.
@ citizen_q:
Yup! They think people should vote for them. They do not try to get people to vote for them.
@ Speranza:
Malaki has been an Iranian stooge. He was in exile in Iran and his Dawa Party were Iranian puppets. We installed an Iranian puppet regime in Iraq.
Olbermann Angling for Return to ESPN
@ Speranza:
I think W was naive. Cheney and his gang are the liars.
Speranza wrote:
He should design new uniforms for the press instead. THEY’RE the new Praetorian Guard.
Instapundit thinks Boehner is putting pressure on Senate Dems with his assertion that he’d consider any gun control that came out of the Senate. I don’t know. I’d like to think that is it, but Boehner has been so weak so far that I don’t know if I believe it.
@ Iron Fist:
I am with you, I think this is either wishful thinking or the RNC talking points.
Pat Caddell is right, Benghazi is a much more dramatic
issue than the sequester.
Four Americans died either do to misfeasance or malfeasance &
the survivors are under wraps. The public can get that.
Rodan wrote:
Cheney is tough-minded in some ways—but it’s a shame that his having a homosexual child has blinded him to the danger the gay-rights movement poses to the Constitution.
I do not think I have heard one prominent conservative figure, certainly not any Republican, articulate intelligent opposition to the same-sex marriage push in purely Constitutional and political terms.
Reince Priebus is out supposedly doing minority outreach.
How’s he doing?
You probably didn’t know that until I told you.
The GOP has no idea how to market a message. Hell, they don’ even have a cohesive, unifying message to market.
Iron Fist wrote:
Boehner is one of those inflatable clowns with sand at the bottom that were popular toys when I was a kid. Blow ‘em up, put sand in the base, and you can punch it and punch it while it pops back up each time you knock it over.
@ RIX:
And the real sequester that we should be talking about is that of the survivors.
Carolina Girl wrote:
I would bet that the Benghazi survivors have been kept under wraps for the same reason that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, or whatever he’s called this week, was hauled off in the dead of night; to ensure that no reporter with silly ideas about doing his job gets to talk with them.
I’m still betting that Nakoula was being funded by the Administration to produce his Mohammed video, precisely for the purpose of providing something to point to as an excuse for some Muslim eruption and to apologize to the Muslims for. That is, to my mind, the only thing that explains how widely the Administration, and practically nobody else, was so aware of that obscure piece of crap.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
You really have been worked up lately on Gay Marriage.
@ Bumr50:
I saw somebody catch a ton of flack for saying that here a few days back…
Bumr50 wrote:
Yeah with no infrastructure to counter Democrat lies. OFA has already begun smearing Rubio and Susanan Martinez with Hispanic voters. The emails are out already and the Tweets.
Unless something is done about OFA, the Republicans will go nowhere.
@ Mike C.:
You caught slack becasue you said Technology does not matter. No one disputes getting better messaging. But you can not do that without a counter to OFA.
As they say at Gateway Pundit, “This is getting a little creepy”: Obama DHS purchases 2,700 light-armored tanks to go with its 1.6 billion-bullet stockpile.
Rodan wrote:
Yes—for two reasons:
1) I find it extremely frustrating that people who can understand that it is financially disastrous to mortgage the country by borrowing money we don’t have do not understand that it is politically disastrous to mortgage Constitutional rights in the name of “tolerance”;
2) There is a case now before the Supreme Court that is going to be a disaster.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
Would yopu like to do a guest post and gather all your points into one thread?
Army sniper teams battle the mutant giant rats of Tehran.
That’s the truth. The Media should display as much outrage
as they did when W would go to the ranch to clear brush.
Rodan wrote:
I’ll consider it. There’s a lot—and some of the material is not linkable, since it exists, as far as I know, only in hard copy.
@ buzzsawmonkey:
The militarization of the police has been going on for 20 years. I’d say it got a lot creepy with the Waco Massacre, and has never gotten any better. That DHS feels the need to have enough bullets on hand to fight a 30-year insurrection should be of concern to all Americans. What do they know that we don’t know that makes them fear this?
Rodan wrote:
As I said the other day, I don’t give a crap if you have Vorlon technology if you have nothing to transmit by it. Priorities….
@ Iron Fist:
It all began with Nixon and his stupid war on drugs. Drug Prohibition is the pretext used to infringe on our personal liberties.
@ Mike C.:
You should feel good then, the Republican Party agrees with you that Technology does not matter. Enjoy your defeats in 2014 and being wiped out in 2016.
Iron Fist wrote:
I remember shrugging off Waco at the time as “just some wackos”—the equivalent, if you will, of Philadelphia burning out the block where the MOVE nuts were holed up back in the ’80s. In other words, a one-off blunder that got out of hand due to incompetence, with tragic consequences.
Since then, I’ve come to see the government’s whacking wackos at Waco to more in the nature of a wake-up call that I missed at the time.
Rodan wrote:
Point 1 -- I’m not a Republican. I’ve never belonged to a political party in my life.
Point 2 -- You enjoy your losses convincing voters you’re Democrat-Lite via high tech. Maybe if the Republicans can get handle on Hispandering that will help, eh? Preferably tweeted with a rap accompanyment. Hopefully they can get fully with the program and spend a significant amount of time bashing various and sundry Bushes. Hey, worked for the Dems, right? And if Dem-Lite is the future, go with the working model, yes?
Mike C. wrote:
Nixon was impressed by the French guards (cuirassiers) in their lobster style helmets.
Cool thread on Michael Mann and the CO2 fraud going on over on
http://www.wattsupwiththat.com
We need to pry this crack in the lie base of the commie democrats wider open so that more can see.
It is full lie based all of it.
Hispandering?
@ buzzsawmonkey:
What Waco showed us was that if they can sufficiently demonize a group of people they can and will kill them with impugnity. True, the Branch Davidians had some weird religious beliefs, but were they any less protected by the First Amendment therefore? And it will come a sno surprise to you that now the move is underway to define thse who hold traditional views of homosexuality as the whackos. Will they single them out and kill them? Not yet, I wouldn’t think, but that day may yet come.
Carolina Girl wrote:
In the 2nd century the Praetorian Guards would put the emperorship up for sale to the highest bidder.
@ Iron Fist:
I understand the Social Security Administration recently added another 1,000,000 rounds of 9 mil and .40 to their stockpile.
Are they anticipating a crowd of grannies with canes and walkers descending on the nation’s capitol any time soon?
@ Speranza:
I’m thinking more along the time of the Caesars.
Caught up on Ripper Street yet -- surprisingly, on Saturday I watched an episode I apparently missed -- don’t see how but I did.
Also downloaded the entire “ROME” series off HBO on Demand. Amazing what you get away with on pay cable vis-a-vis gore and sex. Not “I Claudius” by any means!
@ Mike C.:
Bullcrap you are a Bushy Establishment type.
So trying to win over Hispanics is pandering? What would you call Southern Stragtgy then? Was that pandering or becasue they are “real Americans” that was OK. What about the GOP’s outreach to Ethnic Whites under Ike, Nixon and Reagan? Was that pandering also or are they “real Americans.” That term Hispandering I find very offensive BTW.
Your attitude is very revealing why the Republicans lose. But is being a loser is what makes you feel better, go knock yourself out. Many on the Right will not stay on your sinking ship.
Carolina Girl wrote:
If you look at those and the DHS contracts, they’re actually contracts for deliveries over 4-5 years. Not that it’s not stupid, but I mention that because I don’t think it has much to do with the current ammo shortage.
Speranza wrote:
Yup, Republicans who try to win Hispanic voters are called Hisandering. The GOP can only reach out to “real Americans.”
Then they wonder why they lose 70% of the Hispanic vote and 76% of Asians. We are not real Americans according to many Republicans.
I am really considering going Libertarian.
tset
@ taxfreekiller:
Hey huge favor becasue you have connections. Find out what you can about OFA. I did research and it scares the daylights out of me.
The commie Democrats will send you a thank you letter with a note to turn in your guns attached. Make their day.@ Rodan:
@ Carolina Girl:
I think in some measure the grabbermint is buying up as much ammo as possible to keep out the hands of the citizens. A facet of the attack on 2nd Amendment. Firearms with ammunition are at best clumsy clubs.
@ citizen_q:
PIMF!
Let’s try Firearms without ammunition are at best clumsy clubs.
@ Mike C.:
No, I don’t think it has much to do with the current shortage, but I do wonder why DHS wants to have enough ammunition to fight an Iraq-scale insurgency for 30 years. There’s something not right going on. They can’t convince me that they need all that ammunition for “training”.
@ citizen_q:
It’s nice to know that someone else is of that mind as well. I thought I was sounding paranoid in my grey matter. Why does DHS need a billion rounds? Why does it need tanks?
I wonder -- are the personnel of DHS exempt from the posse comitatus laws? (Dear heaven, I’m sounding more and more like my black helicopter seeing friend every day).
@ Mike C.:
I wasn’t thinking ammo shortage -- I’m wondering why Social Security needs an ammo stockpile to rival Belgium.
@ Rodan:
Go under ground http://www.barackobama.com
or just google OFA it is there, you can join, get to be a leader infiltrate them like we did Earth First and Greenpeace.
Make sure none of them know the real you as they will go after you if they find out your a spy.
good luck
If you post about what you find out make sure you use a posting point where they can not track you. I can tell you they can do that as you should know also.
You would be much more useful doing that than gettting in with the Laup Nor libertarian kooks.
Rodan wrote:
Yes, I knew you’d find the term “Hispandering” offensive. It’s why I used it.
Many on “The Right” have already jumped off my sinking ship. The common term for them is “RINOs.” Some of your favorites, like Boner (sic) and McLame (sic) are off the ship and far away.
Look, I’m an old-fashioned, crude guy with just simple thinking available to me. I think in basic terms. In my quaint opinion, I don’t want a candidate that appeals to blacks, Hispanics, urbanites, or whatever. I want a candidate that appeals to Americans. And appeals to Americans on our founding American principles. If that sort of basic thing upsets you, good.
Right now there’s an all-out war going on over one of those basic principles. Silly me, I call it what is popularly known as a “litmus test.” It’s more important than messaging technology, it’s more important than what some muslims are doing somewhere, it’s even more important than economic issues -- it’s life-or-death for the very most basic precepts of our form of government. Lose that battle, and frankly, I don’t give a crap about the rest of it.
And, if I can remember, that will be my last comment on this basic topic.
@ Iron Fist:
I think they are stockpiling ammo to create a shortage and drive up prices. That way people can’t get ammo.
It’s gun control through other means.
Carolina Girl wrote:
Those aren’t tanks, despite what someone wrote as a scare headline.
Posse comitatus has nothing to do with law enforcement agencies. It applies to the military.
@ Mike C.:
If you ever do find a party to join, let me know. I’ll be right there with you.
On the light armor things DHS has bought, we might hope it is because they listen to U.S. regarding the danger the open Mexican border is.
If there is a govt. problem and food shortage ect. down there the border can be over run now with ease by large nunbers or Chavez and the ones of Iran could just send large numbers of death squads to attack over it. As it is now they could get far inland in AZ, New Mexica, Clif and Texas. Even get to nuke plants.
But knowing the commie Democrats they fear U.S. more.
@ Carolina Girl:
DHS is not the military, so they are not bound by the posse comitatus law. Besides, they don’t have tanks. They have MRAPs.
Rodan wrote:
They haven’t purchased enough to create a shortage or drive up prices. Whatever amount they’ve ordered is a tiny fraction of actual production.
That ammo is all sitting in people’s basements.
@ lobo91:
I can’t say it’s a physical impossibility, but I’ve sure never seen any evidence of a political party worth joining…
Carolina Girl wrote:
I am of a conspiratorial bent these days.
I keep thinking komrade zero’s infamous statement about need a civilian domestic force equal in strength to the military.
Google “obama civilian security force”, working so I don’t have time to surf through all the hits back to 2007 and 2008. There are youtube videos
I too was wondering about the tanks. I know they won’t be using them to secure the border against drug cartels. Hell, they were arming them not too long ago.
There is only one current in any way effective counter to the commie Democrats and the RINO’s and that is within the Republican Party.
We took Texas back, and there are the numbers of people in every state to do the same. Only thing is there are to many who think the waste land of the libertarians or other minor operations can do something about the commies. Not at all.
No time to build another party. We have to bend the R’s to our will.
@ lobo91:
Thanks for that. I thought they were trying to create a shortage.
@ taxfreekiller:
OFA is planning to make Texas blue. Do NOT underestimate them.
lobo91 wrote:
Exactly correct. The government hasn’t created the current ammo shortage -- the American people have created the current ammo shortage. This should concern the government.
Rodan wrote:
I’m sure they’d like to, but that’s not what’s happening.
For one thing, most of the figures you see being reported are for multi-year contracts. They won’t take delivery of some of it until after Obama’s gone. That’s certainly not affecting current supplies.
And a billion rounds is something less than one month’s worth of production.
@ lobo91:
I’ve heard people say -- forget gold, stockpile ammo. It’s going for a buck a round in places and you can resell it your surplus.
Can I just say how much it’s alarming me to read and hear what’s going on these days. $4.50 for the same loaf of bread that was $2.00 when Obama took office. Gas is over $4.00 a gallon here in the Golden State. And Obama just appears to be working harder and harder at consolidating Presidential power, with the help and support of the stenographic media.
@ Mike C.:
I think it was a Jersey gun shop that recently named Obama “gun salesman of the year.”
@ Mike C.:
That’s nice use an offensive term. Do not bitch when Democrats trash Old Wahite males. You yourself used a derogatory statement and are no better than them.
Yeah, you think its RINOs who are going to jump ship? Just wait until Libertarian leaning Center Right Republicans get sick of losing and people with your stubborn attitude and jump ship. Then what, your party will go the way of the whigs.
Yup, the only real Americans in your book are Rural Whites. Everyone else is non America. No thanks, I do not want to be part of a Party that tells people they do not consider to be real Americans to FOAD.
I appreciate your honesty and it confirms what I always thought the Republican Base thinks of othesr who are not in their club.
Enjoy losing elections!
@ lobo91:
Someone I know posted a picture on Facebook recently about “UN Tanks” in the states. I had to inform them that those tanks were desert tan not the brilliant white of U.N. vehicles. As well, there’s not one generic type of U.N. vehicle. Posted links to pictures so that they would understand.
Some people just don’t get it.
@ lobo91:
This is all just fear mongering then? That was my suspicion. There’s enough to worry about with Obama that there’s no need to make shit up.
New Thread at 12 EST.
@ Mike C.:
People are buying thousands of rounds in calibers they don’t even use. It’s getting ridiculous.
@ Carolina Girl:
That’s what’s causing the shortages.
@ Rodan:
You know Rodan, you really are an asshole. Fuck this -- I’m out.
@ Rodan:
You either have a reading comprehension problem or you’re deliberately trolling.
Not sure which, but it’s starting to piss me off.
@ lobo91:
What do you know about the government buying up brass? I noticed at our local gun range that where I used to see about two or three people with brass catchers, now fully 50% have them. And the range is annoyed because from what I gather they’re used to sweeping up and keeping the brass. One guy told us that the government was buying up all the brass and the EPA was going to be make it harder and harder for reloaders to purchase lead.
It’s getting harder and harder to separate the breakfast cereal from the game on the back of the box.
@ Carolina Girl:
They can only buy what people sell them. I haven’t heard anything about them buying brass, and don’t know of any good reason they’d be doing so. They don’t reload ammo.
In fact, it usually works the other way around. Government (including the military) usually sells expended brass. When they stopped selling fired .50 cal brass a couple years back, it caused a huge outcry and they ultimately resumed selling it.
The lead thing has been an ongoing issue. That one really is a backdoor attempt at control.
Rodan’s exclusivity from “my kind” will insure Obama’s clan long rule
My tent is much more inclusive
@ lobo91:
Re the brass, that’s an interesting point. If the government isn’t selling the brass as they’ve done in the past, I can see where that could be a problem. Maybe they’re melting it down so Obama can build some statues to himself since he fancies himself a modern-day Caesar (minus, you know, the intelligence and the military genius) -- he’s already using Caesar’s favorite political ploy -- money and goodies to the plebes to buy their good will and support.
I did a little checking, and this is the DHS division those MRAPs (not tanks) belong to:
As soon as the ammo shortage gets really serious, never fear—DHS workers will pilfer it and sell it on the black market.
A little Dale Carnegie goes a long way
Oh, Mother of God, tell this twit that the only voice he’s got belongs to Karl Rove….
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/03/04/jeb-bush-says-he-wont-rule-out-2016-white-house-run-but-wont-declare-today/#disqus_thread
@ Carolina Girl:
They still are, back in 2009 they tried stopping it. There was too much screaming and yelling so they resumed it again. Any post about this issue that’s new always seems to quote the original 2009 article. Just did some searching on this since I have heard it making the rounds.
lobo91 wrote:
It’s the Gay Enforcement Police!
@ Carolina Girl:
Bush could prompt me to stay home in 2016. We don’t need another bush. As you say, the only person pining for the Glory Days of the Bush Administration is Karl Rove.
Iron Fist wrote:
I thought that was part of the NEA?
waldensianspirit wrote:
Don’t be silly.
Implying that anyone who’s opposed to breaking the country up into little hyphenated groups is a member of the KKK is a brilliant strategy!
//
Iron Fist wrote:
We are the Knights Who Say, “Ni!”—and we want a shrubbery!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Thought of that:-) And how I can capitalize….
@ lobo91:
Unfortunately, the breaking of America into little hyphenated groups is already a done deal. We either play the game by the new groundrules or we forfit.
Iron Fist wrote:
If that’s true then the game’s already over.
@ lobo91:
To a degree, it is over, and we lost. I think electing Obama to a Second Term spells the doom of America as a united nation. Obama intends to spend until he breaks the back of the economy. It won’ tmatter who got a leg up in the hyphenated Americans class then, but the low info voters that voted for Obama don’t know that, and most importantly don’t want to know it. They are content as Obama breaks this once pround nation. At least someone else will be paying fr Sandra Fluke’s birth control.
Systems always aggregate. Just sad the Best cannot beat the Byzantine Empire.
And agglomerates
lobo91 wrote:
The game is over. But don’t let that stop you from playing!
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
We’ll be switching to a new game.
@ lobo91:
Gosh. There was a time when Matthew Broderick wasn’t a paunchy, pasty-faced nebbish with lifeless eyes.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
Living with Sarah Jessica Parker for 15 years will do that.
lobo91 wrote:
She probably sucks the life out of him every night—and not in a fun way.
Rodan wrote:
Mike C. is NOT a typical member of the Republican base.
The Republican base is made up of Second Amendment people, fiscal conservatives, and pro-lifers. It’s primarily Christian.
buzzsawmonkey wrote:
I get in trouble everywhere I go for talking about secession and/or emigration.
Because I don’t think that secession will happen soon enough to do me any good, I will soon emigrate. It takes a LOT of planning and preparation to do it right.
@ Iron Fist:
At least Clinton was an American, he did many things I disagree with, but we knew from day one, his history as an American, Obama not so much…………..
@ 36 RIX:I would say Benghazi is 100 times worse than Watergate also
@ darkwords: Some talking head on Fox needs to ask the question “did obama kill 4 people in Benghazi to meet a political objective?” The question needs to be asked of Obama in the media at large.
Carolina Girl wrote:
The worst mistake Ronald Reagan ever made was picking that prissy GHWB to be his V.P.