First time visitor? Learn more.

Our President Budgets Like My Ex-Wife

by Flyovercountry ( 34 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Special Report at March 13th, 2013 - 11:30 am

          Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

During the less than blissful early days of my first marriage, (unfortunately, a list that can be said to have numerous entries,) I would come home from work on certain days to find my young bride sitting in our apartment’s small living room with what appeared to be at first glance, about a dozen shopping bags. These bags would invariably have hempen handles and be made of that sturdier form of paper that was pretty close to corrugated cardboard in quality. The bags served two purposes. First, they served to help transport the contents from store to home and let everyone who saw them know that the store who provided the shopper with such happiness was where the purchases were made. The second and more subtle purpose was to let the entire world know that the prices exacted for the contents of those bags resided in a region somewhat North of the prices exacted at one’s local Wal-Mart. Her admittedly cute brown eyes would look up at me each and every time, while she made the same statement, “you’ll never guess how much I saved you at Hudson’s today.”

Welcome to the world of spin. Those shoes, that anyone with two functioning grey cells would have to have recognized as not only being unnecessary, but also soon to be abandoned, were supposed to be viewed by me as some sort of bargain that could not be passed up. They were half off you see, which means that we saved half of the price listed, and only paid the price exacted. I was too insistent on concentrating on the latter number for her tastes, and anger ensued when she wanted credit for the, “budget savings,” from the full price listed with only half being paid. Our car you see needed repairs, or groceries needed to be purchased, or heat paid, or savings invested for those golden years far off in an unseen future.

I told you that story so that you would understand this latest gem, in its proper context. Recently I heard the President, during his latest campaign tour, which has been termed a, “charm offensive?” convincing us of his bipartisan bona fides, make this statement.

I’ve already cut $2.5 Trillion in spending from the budget over the next 10 years.

We’ve gone over this nefarious ground before, you and I. It is that bit of Legislative Kabuki Theater known as Baseline Budgeting, and ridding ourselves of it should definitely be the first order of business once sane people start winning elections again in sufficient numbers. You would have to be from some woozy Unicorn Infested alternate dream Universe to believe that anything this President has done or advocated can in any way be termed, a spending cut.

In 2008, the last year that George W. Bush was our President, he presided over an amount of spending that was admittedly alarming in both size and scope. His deficits, (which during his last two years in office were partly the doing of a Nancy Pelosi led House and a Harry Reid led Senate,) rang all sorts of bells at the astronomically absurd number of $450 Billion. (I say partly, because they still required the man’s signature in order to become law.) Today, those $450 Billion deficits would be a welcome change of pace, since Barack Obama’s promise to, “cut them in half,” came with the usual Obama Promise Expiration Date, which is about 5 whole minutes after he’s left what ever stage he was on at the time. Our deficits are now North of $1.4 Trillion, and will automatically grow at a staggering 8% per year according to the baseline law. Any growth less than that 8% is, as a matter of the magical baseline law, now labeled a cut in spending. It should also be noted that President Obama as of now, has not yet signed his name to a budget, as is Constitutionally required. Perhaps, and I’m just spit balling here, this is part of the problem.

A new demographic in American society has been identified this year, and it has been given credit for the election of our current President. That demographic has been labeled, and appropriately so by the way, as the low information voter. That group of people who vote in our national elections, helping to decide our collective fate as it were, without bothering to familiarize themselves with trite little things such as actual policy positions, basic economics, foreign policy beliefs, or even the cursory perusal of a candidate’s resume. I’ve talked to these people plenty over the last 5 years, and one thing is certain, they were all Obama voters, and proud of their choice. The astounding thing for me is this, many of them were well aware of the fact that they were low information voters, and just plainly felt that the banality of the Obama campaign and the endless stream of mindless platitudes emanating from that high tech internet driven cult group known as OFA, (Organizing For America,) would somehow translate into real world results that would match the dream and not the nightmare.

Hopety Change has led to some real world disaster. Unemployment has been reported as having ticked down, but only the economically illiterate believe that fairy tale being told by the Solis Labor Department. The Labor Force Participation Rate is the lowest since just prior to World War II, a period of time commonly referred to as, “The Great Depression.” Per Capita Income has dropped each and every year of the Obama Presidency, and every single commodity requires more of our devalued dollars to purchase on a world market that has clearly not been fooled by the single greatest currency manipulation in world history. Our President’s goal, clearly is to follow this path, knowing full well that the ramifications of such an action will mean tremendous economic hardship for Millions of Americans. At the same time that he is doing what ever he can to destroy our nation, he is telling those irresponsible minions who make up the low information voter demographic, (unfortunately one of the largest American demographics,) that he has indeed seen to the greatest spending cut of any President in American history.

Please for the love of God America, buy one of those $1.00 calculators that are available in dollar stores all around this great nation and perform some simple math. You don’t cut spending by increasing the amount on the checks you write from $2.5 Trillion to $3.8 Trillion. That, at least to people not operating in the Unicorn filled world of the baseline scam, is what is termed a spending increase.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

34 Responses to “Our President Budgets Like My Ex-Wife”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Speranza
    1 | March 13, 2013 11:52 am

    He has no budget. He wants to spend us into bankruptcy.


  2. 2 | March 13, 2013 12:06 pm

    This shows the absurdity of writing “laws” like the one requiring that annual budgets be passed. The “laws” have no penalty and no agency for enforcement. They’re just a waste of paper. The attorney general is in contempt of congress. So what?


  3. eaglesoars
    3 | March 13, 2013 12:18 pm

    I had to restart the Howard Stern audio twice because I was laughing so hard


  4. MikeA
    4 | March 13, 2013 12:21 pm

    So its kind of like… I can’t be out of money, I have more checks. and its helpful when you can print your own money. That is until everyone stops accpeting your money since its worthless.


  5. eaglesoars
    5 | March 13, 2013 12:24 pm

    MikeA wrote:

    its helpful when you can print your own money.

    Now, how. It’s not printing, it’s digitizing


  6. 6 | March 13, 2013 12:27 pm

    @ MikeA:

    Not quite. If you kite checks, you’re going to jail. See the difference?


  7. MikeA
    7 | March 13, 2013 12:40 pm

    @ Mike C.:

    Ah yes…

    Its good to be the king.


  8. 9 | March 13, 2013 12:41 pm

    @ Speranza:

    He figures Ben Bernanke will keep printing money.


  9. 10 | March 13, 2013 12:51 pm

    @ MikeA:

    Its even better being the god-king!


  10. eaglesoars
    11 | March 13, 2013 1:02 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Hey Lobo91!

    remember that story the other day that said a chaplain was awarded a bronze star for a koran-sensitivity powerpoint presentation?

    NOT TRUE

    It WAS an end-of-tour medal.

    Rich Lowry at NRO has the story


  11. taxfreekiller
    12 | March 13, 2013 1:09 pm

    New Climate Gate e-mails sent by unknown person up at

    http://www.wattsupwiththat.com

    and other sites he sent them to along with the password ..


  12. 13 | March 13, 2013 1:12 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    I really wish our side would stop latching on to these false stories. I swear the hysteria I see sometimes is just plain stupid.

    I am convinced these BS stories our side latches onto is all OFA disinformation.


  13. buzzsawmonkey
    14 | March 13, 2013 1:14 pm

    The Obama Credo.

    RTWT.


  14. lobo91
    15 | March 13, 2013 1:15 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Figures.

    Most civilians have no clue what they’re looking at in these stories.


  15. buzzsawmonkey
    16 | March 13, 2013 1:27 pm

    @ Rodan:

    Reply to you in the prior thread.


  16. eaglesoars
    17 | March 13, 2013 1:30 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    New Climate Gate e-mails sent by unknown person up at

    http://www.wattsupwiththat.com

    and other sites he sent them to along with the password ..

    justification for regional reconstructions rather than what Mann
    et al did (I don’t think we can say we didn’t do Mann et al because we think it is crap!)

    *snort*


  17. eaglesoars
    18 | March 13, 2013 1:31 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    Most civilians have no clue what they’re looking at in these stories.

    That was no civilian, son, that was a journalist


  18. taxfreekiller
    19 | March 13, 2013 1:33 pm

    Do not do like Mann did it will make people snort at you and not just because your short.


  19. taxfreekiller
    20 | March 13, 2013 1:34 pm

    What a “Mann” ing punk that guy is, worse than John F. Kerry.


  20. eaglesoars
    21 | March 13, 2013 1:38 pm

    taxfreekiller wrote:

    What a “Mann” ing punk that guy is, worse than John F. Kerry.

    Did you know he’s suing National Review? PSU will pay for it and he thinks they have deep pockets (not as deep after the $41 mil the Sandusky debacle cost) -- but we’re all waiting for discovery.

    That should be great fun!


  21. eaglesoars
    22 | March 13, 2013 1:58 pm

    wanna laugh your ass off?

    listen to this. A guy is in his car and he calls his boss to leave a msg when something happens……….


  22. eaglesoars
    23 | March 13, 2013 2:07 pm

    omg I think the smoke is WHITE!!!


  23. BatGuano
    24 | March 13, 2013 2:08 pm

    Ye,white Smoke


  24. 25 | March 13, 2013 2:11 pm

    Damn, that was quick.


  25. 26 | March 13, 2013 2:22 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    I searched youtube for the Guido Sarducci bit about Sarducci making book on who would be the next Pontiff. Funny stuff. They solved this before SNL could get Novello back on the air. Oh well, congrats to my Catholic friends on your new Pope.


  26. 27 | March 13, 2013 2:34 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Someone in the office is saying it’s the French cardinal that’s been elevated.


  27. BatGuano
    28 | March 13, 2013 2:34 pm

    @ Flyovercountry:
    I loved Father Sarducci way back then. I too offer my congratulations to the Catholic faithful.


  28. 29 | March 13, 2013 2:35 pm

    I did a Thread on the New Pope.


  29. eaglesoars
    30 | March 13, 2013 2:35 pm

    Carolina Girl wrote:

    @ eaglesoars:

    Someone in the office is saying it’s the French cardinal that’s been elevated.

    nobody knows yet -- he hasn’t come out but the Swiss Guard has taken up positions


  30. 31 | March 13, 2013 2:35 pm

    @ Flyovercountry:

    So your post gets exposure, I will put it in special report and do the Pope as a breaking thread.


  31. 32 | March 13, 2013 2:38 pm

    @ eaglesoars:

    Hee….lawyers love to speculate. Always hysterical. My only answer when she said it was “is the Camerlengo your paid informant?”

    She blinked and stared. I said “see, you guys don’t understand us at ALL.”


  32. eaglesoars
    34 | March 13, 2013 2:41 pm

    @ Carolina Girl:

    I have a question. Does the Camerlengo change with the pope?


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David