First time visitor? Learn more.

Propaganda For The Masses!

by coldwarrior ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Cult of Obama, Free Speech, government, Media, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Special Report at July 14th, 2013 - 10:43 pm

ideadlly, the ready is familiar with The Communist Manifesto, the goals of Communism, the Smith-Mundt Act, shortwave, and Propaganda. Becasue these are fairly specialized areas of knowledge, I will put this post in SPecial Report so everyone can get caught up.

 

Below is a translated excerpt of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. The Left slowly gains and are willing to take the long road, never quit, always inching toward victory. Those of us who had the last internet, shortwave radio, are familiar with the fact that if one tried to QSL a VOA or other US Govt broadcasts meant for foreign consumption, you would be met with a letter from VOA, et al, that states that  “you did not in fact hear that broadcast as it was not meant to be heard in the US, thank you, have a nice day.” They would use your SINPO data tho.

 

VOA and Radio Free Europe during the Cold War were propaganda run by the US Government. Propaganda does not necessarily mean that there were overt lies like Radio Moscow’s eternal claims that ‘wheat production is up 32%” meanwhile, we were shipping tons of grain to the USSR. Propaganda means this:

prop·a·gan·da
 [ pròppə gándə ]
  1. publicity to promote something: information put out by an organization or government to promote a policy, idea, or cause

With that definition in mind, however, lets take a look at this article and imagine the ways that today’s FEDGOV can now manipulate, indeed formally propagandize everything in the domestic market. Read the below article very carefully:

For decades, a so-called anti-propaganda law prevented the U.S. government’s mammoth broadcasting arm from delivering programming to American audiences. But on July 2, that came silently to an end with the implementation of a new reform passed in January. The result: an unleashing of thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption in a reform initially criticized as a green light for U.S. domestic propaganda efforts. So what just happened?

Until this month, a vast ocean of U.S. programming produced by the Broadcasting Board of Governors such as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks could only be viewed or listened to at broadcast quality in foreign countries. The programming varies in tone and quality, but its breadth is vast: It’s viewed in more than 100 countries in 61 languages. The topics covered include human rights abuses in Iran; self-immolation in Tibet; human trafficking across Asia; and on-the-ground reporting in Egypt and Iraq.

The restriction of these broadcasts was due to the Smith-Mundt Act, a long standing piece of legislation that has been amended numerous times over the years, perhaps most consequentially by Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright. In the 70s, Fulbright was no friend of VOA and Radio Free Europe, and moved to restrict them from domestic distribution, saying they “should be given the opportunity to take their rightful place in the graveyard of Cold War relics.” Fulbright’s amendment to Smith-Mundt was bolstered in 1985 by Nebraska Senator Edward Zorinsky who argued that such “propaganda” should be kept out of America as to distinguish the U.S. “from the Soviet Union where domestic propaganda is a principal government activity.”

Zorinsky and Fulbright sold their amendments on sensible rhetoric: American taxpayers shouldn’t be funding propaganda for American audiences. So did Congress just tear down the American public’s last defense against domestic propaganda?

BBG spokeswoman Lynne Weil insists BBG is not a propaganda outlet, and its flagship services such as VOA “present fair and accurate news.”

“They don’t shy away from stories that don’t shed the best light on the United States,” she told The Cable. She pointed to the charters of VOA and RFE: “Our journalists provide what many people cannot get locally: uncensored news, responsible, discussion, and open debate.”

A former U.S. government source with knowledge of the BBG says the organization is no Pravda, but it does advance U.S. interests in more subtle ways. In Somalia, for instance, VOA serves as counterprogramming to outlets peddling anti-American or jihadist sentiment. “Somalis have three options for news,” the source said, “word of mouth, Al-Shabaab or VOA Somalia.”

This partially explains the push to allow BBG broadcasts on local radio stations in the United States. The agency wants to reach diaspora communities, such as St. Paul Minnesota’s significant Somali expat community. “Those people can get Al-Shabaab, they can get Russia Today, but they couldn’t get access to their taxpayer-funded news sources like VOA Somalia,” the source said. “It was silly.”

Lynne added that the reform has a transparency benefit as well. “Now Americans will be able to know more about what they are paying for with their tax dollars – greater transparency is a win-win for all involved,” she said. And so with that we have the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which passed as part of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, and went into effect this month.

But if anyone needed a reminder of the dangers of domestic propaganda efforts, the past 12 months provided ample reasons. Last year, two USA Today journalists were ensnared in a propaganda campaign after reporting about millions of dollars in back taxes owed by the Pentagon’s top propaganda contractor in Afghanistan. Eventually, one of the co-owners of the firm confessed to creating phony websites and Twitter accounts to smear the journalists anonymously. Additionally, just this month, The Washington Post exposed a counter propaganda program by the Pentagon that recommended posting comments on a U.S. website run by a Somali expat with readers opposing Al-Shabaab. “Today, the military is more focused on manipulating news and commentary on the Internet, especially social media, by posting material and images without necessarily claiming ownership,” reported The Post.

But for BBG officials, the references to Pentagon propaganda efforts are nauseating, particularly because the Smith-Mundt Act never had anything to do with regulating the Pentagon, a fact that was misunderstood in media reports in the run-up to the passage of new Smith-Mundt reforms in January.

One example included a report by the late Buzzfeed reporter Michael Hastings, who suggested that the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act would open the door to Pentagon propaganda of U.S. audiences. In fact, as amended in 1987, the act only covers portions of the State Department engaged in public diplomacy abroad (i.e. the public diplomacy section of the “R” bureau, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors.)

But the news circulated regardless, much to the displeasure of Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), a sponsor of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012. “To me, it’s a fascinating case study in how one blogger was pretty sloppy, not understanding the issue and then it got picked up by Politico‘s Playbook, and you had one level of sloppiness on top of another,” Thornberry told The Cable last May. “And once something sensational gets out there, it just spreads like wildfire.”

That of course doesn’t leave the BBG off the hook if its content smacks of agitprop. But now that its materials are allowed to be broadcast by local radio stations and TV networks, they won’t be a complete mystery to Americans. “Previously, the legislation had the effect of clouding and hiding this stuff,” the former U.S. official told The Cable. “Now we’ll have a better sense: Gee some of this stuff is really good. Or gee some of this stuff is really bad. At least we’ll know now.”

 

Look at the bolded paragraph above…the Somalis in MN don’t have the internet? This isn’t aimed at them. But be assured this WILL be aimed at you in the future!

There is no way that today’s FEDGOV just lets this opportunity slide by. This will go far in legitimizing the relationship between the Mass Media and FEDGOV. In fact, now it can become official. It is fairly obvious that the ‘Free and Fair Press’ died many years ago. How can this new paradigm keep the press, who are failing financially, above water? I can see some tax dollars going to the networks/papers in exchange for a pipeline of propaganda without the pretense of a free and fair press like is the charade now. Eventually:

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

Karl Marx, yet again, had one of his goals achieved:

 

 

Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionizing the mode of production.

 

These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.

 

Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

 

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

 

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

 

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

 

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

 

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

 

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

 

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

 

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

 

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

 

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.

 

When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.

 

In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.

File this one away…for later

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

2 Responses to “Propaganda For The Masses!”
( jump to bottom )

  1. yenta-fada
  2. yenta-fada
    2 | July 15, 2013 12:50 am

    Not to take away from a serious topic, I have to say that art mirrors life.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRx4pLbfPyM


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David