First time visitor? Learn more.

It’s a Wonderful day in the Neighborhood…

by Rodan ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Progressives, Republican Party at August 27th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

Guest Blogger: Doriangrey


If, as Erika Johnsen and Ed Morrissey over at HotAir insist on telling their conservative audience, their really are only 4 republicans talking about Impeaching Obama, then why are the Democratic spokesholes like David Axelrod and their pet Fifth Column Treasonous Media whores like Chris Matthews trying so hard to convince the American public that all of this impeachment talk is crazy lunatic fringe conspiracy talk?

Axelrod: Republicans are trying to delegitimize Obama just like they did Clinton

Yes, because that’s what it’s always about, everybody: These trifling conservatives’ personal contempt for a particular Democrat and their deep-seated desire to undermine him, and rarely-to-never about sincere qualms in matters of policy or the lawful administration thereof. So suggested David Axelrod, anyway, during an MSNBC segment bizarrely entitled “Impeachment Fever” — although, as Andrew Stiles noted at NRO, the grand total of Republican impeachment-mentions inciting this particular outrageous outrage from the MSNBC crowd comes to… four.

It looks as though Erika has joined Ed Morrissey’s merry band of Marxists wearing Conservative cloths. What she is doing here is attempting the same kind of Marxist propaganda and thought control that Ed so often engages in. She is attempting to tell her readers what they are allowed to think. Rather than asking why are douche bags like Matthews and Axelrod so worked up and trying to get in front of calls for Obama’s impeachment, she like Ed Morrissey is attempting to tell her readers, this is a subject you are not allowed to even consider.

Ed tried that the other days as well, though on a different subject. He was following the lead of Breitbart editor Joel Pollak in trying to tell their predominantly conservatives audiences that they were not allowed to discus the racist hypocritical double standard being used as a club against conservatives. Joel, in an act that straight up disgraced the memory of his former boss Andrew Breitbart wrote the following article, and then closed it for comments. Apparently Joel knew that his audience would not agree with him, so he exercised his god like dictatorial powers and ended any discussion before it even began..

The Racial Tit-for-Tat of Crime Reporting

Back when the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin story first exploded onto the national scene, with false accounts of a “white” shooter and edited 911 calls, we at Breitbart News made an editorial decision not to become involved in the racial tit-for-tat reporting that tempted many other sites. There was no reason to draw attention to the hypocrisy of the media and the so-called civil rights establishment regarding crimes where the racial labels were reversed, because the labels in the Martin case were wrong in the first place.

Ed’s version of this same propaganda crap was every bit as pathetic as Joel’s, perhaps the only difference is that Ed made the mistake of allowing his readers to comment on his bullshit.

Should conservatives resist the race tu quoque?

So says Breitbart editor Joel Pollak, a good friend of mine, who revealed yesterday that his site intentionally steered clear of the race discussion relating to recent crimes in Oklahoma and Spokane. While a good discussion of media malpractice is always welcome, the urge in using specific and unrelated cases usually leads people to take the arguments too far — a practice of the Left that Pollak would rather avoid (via Ace):

It is becoming harder for some conservative journalists to resist the tit-for-tat arguments when Sharpton et al. continue to pretend the Martin case was about race when everyone involved, including the prosecution, said that it was not. Even the Martin family, given the opportunity (before the verdict) to comment on the fact that there were no black jurors, said that they placed their faith in their fellow citizens and the judicial process. The fact that the racial argument has survived the trial and the facts is both sad and frustrating.

So the temptation to report the race of alleged perpetrators when the roles are reversed is now stronger than it was before–too strong for some conservative sites in the Christopher Lane murder, which reported initially (and inaccurately) that all three assailants were black. Yes, there is a crime problem in the black community. Yes, there is an failure among black leaders, from Obama on down, to do anything about it. That story doesn’t need new white victims to make it potent. This is a game without winners. I’d rather not play.

I spoke about this on my show this morning, in the final segment of the second hour. There are some issues that the Lane and Benton murders may have in common, mainly bored teenagers with little supervision and no engagement in core values — but those issues are not limited to any one community, nor are two incidents involving five teenagers a particularly good look at teens as a whole or an indication of broad cultural decline.

Last week, for instance, I wrote about the story of DHS manager Ayo Kimathi, who runs a website warning fellow African-Americans of a coming race war, complete with enemies list — including President Obama. The issue isn’t that DHS hired a racist, nor does one staffing decision indicate a broad problem with race in America. The public policy issue there was that Homeland Security apparently didn’t know that one of its managers was an extremist that publicly identified the President as an enemy of the people, an act that would probably be prominently featured in a DHS report on Tea Party extremism if Kimathi was part of that movement. I noted at the end:

I’m not “hesitating to be blunt” about race…[.] It’s rather obvious that Kimathi has an issue with race, but that’s not the public policy/performance issue here. Nor is it in any individual act of racism, either. Bringing up isolated incidents of racial animus and stretching that into a narrative about everyone else is what the Left has done for decades. Count me out of that nonsense.

Pollak is saying the same thing. Essentially, the argument from conservatives is self-defeating. We resist categorizing people by identity, and argue against the “society is to blame” explanation for crime and social ills. We preach individual responsibility and consequences. When we stray from that, even to score a few justified points on the media for their hypocrisy and bias, we risk turning individual incidents into “narratives” that aren’t really supported by the facts, and lose track of our philosophical compass. In my opinion, that’s too high a cost for too low a reward.

If you read the comments in at Ed’s article, you will see that the majority of his audience considered Ed and Joel’s actions pretty much on a par with Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister who infamously attempted to surrender Europe to Adolph Hitler. Yes, a few of the brain damaged squishies tried to defend Ed, but the vast majority were having none of it.

The truth is pretty simple in both of these cases, the corrupt GOP leadership is taking, like Ed and Joel, a very Neville Chamberlain approach to Barack Insane Obama and his Marxist cabal. they (The GOP Leadership) utterly refuse to discuss Impeachment or the hypocrisy of the left’s racist attitudes, the Republican base and America’s conservatives on the other hand have no stomach for appeasement or surrender.

David Axelrod and Chrissy Matthews are desperately trying to get out in front of the impeachment issue because while the corrupt GOP Leadership is doing everything they can to avoid the issue, the republican base and conservatives are talking about it, screaming about it and demanding that their corrupt leadership take action. The same is true of the hypocritical racist issue, the republican base and conservatives are damned tired of the Democrats/Marxist and Fifth Column Treasonous Media’s hypocritical double standard being used as a weapon against them.

Ed Morrissey and Joel Pollak, along with the miserable excuse for a Speaker for the House John Boehner, have adopted a strategy. Never engage in any battle that the enemy has already told you you can never win. Combine that with their other strategy, of always taking the enemies advice on how to win your battles and it’s no damned wonder the GOP loses on every major issue.

80 percent of American citizen confess to being Christians to one degree or another, yet 3% of our population is dictating what the moral standards of the other 97% will be, 40% are Conservatives yet the 22% of liberals dictate the nations fiscal policies.

HUGH HEWITT reminds us that Obama is the worst President of the United States, but not because of his constant violating of the US constitution, not because of Operation Fast and furious, or Benghazi, or the IRS targeting conservatives or the NAS spying on average Americans, rather because 15,000 Democrat working for UPS are now receiving exactly what they voted for.

Is Obama the worst president ever?

“If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.” — President Obama, Aug. 11, 2009

So said President Obama again and again through 2009 and 2010 as he sold Obamacare to the country. He promised. He put his personal integrity on the line. His word.

If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.

How many UPS employees voted for the president in 2008 and again in 2012? Because on Friday, UPS announced it was dumping 15,000 spouses of UPS employees from their UPS health plans despite the president’s many, many promises to the contrary.

The UPS spouse-dump followed by a few days the news from New Jersey that Obamacare’s rollout there will end the low-cost, high-deductible plan that more than 106,00 Jersey folks liked and which presumably many of them would have preferred to keep.

Oh, and the cost of individual plans are set to rise on average 41 percent in Ohio, and another major insurance company, Anthem Blue Cross, has pulled out of the California market for small businesses.

Is Obama the worst president ever?

With this kind of Neville Chamberlain leadership, is it any wonder that Barack Insane Obama and his Marxist cohorts are being so successful at “Fundamentally Transforming” America into a Marxist Utopia?

(Cross Posted @ The Wilderness of Mirrors)

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

88 Responses to “It’s a Wonderful day in the Neighborhood…”
( jump to bottom )

  1. eaglesoars
    1 | August 27, 2013 4:42 pm

    Great. They sound just like that fount of racist wisdom, Toure.

    There is a war against whites among some in the black community. The truth and reality are one and the same


  2. 2 | August 27, 2013 4:48 pm

    Sorry Dorian, I disagree slightly with your position here. Quite frankly, it is based not upon the guilt of innocence of Barack Obama, but the eventual outcome. The Senate is not going to convict this man, not with its current makeup. This would be a waste of time. Even if the House were to present the perfect case, and prove everything you wished them to prove, what do you suppose would happen in the end?

    I still hold with my same argument. We got ourselves into this mess by a number of failures in the realm of politics, and that is the only way that we have available to us to get things turned around. I agree that Barack Obama deserves to be impeached and found guilty, but the facts as they are now will not permit this.

    We, meaning the good guys, need to win elections, and a lot of them.


  3. lobo91
    3 | August 27, 2013 4:49 pm

    The public policy issue there was that Homeland Security apparently didn’t know that one of its managers was an extremist that publicly identified the President as an enemy of the people, an act that would probably be prominently featured in a DHS report on Tea Party extremism if Kimathi was part of that movement.

    I absolutely agree with that. It’s just another example of the incompetence of this administration. They apparently relied on the guy’s own description of his website to decide that it was okay. Taking two minutes to look at it never even occurred to them, because they were too busy watching Tea Party groups and veterans.


  4. lobo91
    4 | August 27, 2013 4:55 pm

    @ Flyovercountry:

    Exactly. Impeachment is a political remedy, not a legal one. Conducting an impeachment that is 100% guaranteed to fail is beyond stupid. I really don’t understand why so many people can’t grasp that concept.


  5. 5 | August 27, 2013 5:05 pm

    Flyovercountry wrote:

    Quite frankly, it is based not upon the guilt of innocence of Barack Obama, but the eventual outcome. The Senate is not going to convict this man, not with its current makeup.

    Exzactly. Impeachment is a political act. If you aren’t making political calculations on it, then you are barking up the wrong tree. We can’t convict in the Senate. All we can do is flail, and Obama will come out of it beating his breast about the “RAAAAACIST” Republicans, and the low-info voters will nod in agreement. Talk of impeachment may make the hearts of the base flutter (although I ask you, is inflicting a President Biden on the Republic really an act of patriotism?), but it is going to help Obama sell his agenda. At the end of the day, I am all about the policy that is being implemented. Impeaching Obama won’t bring us any closer to being able to implement our policy. Indeed, it could give Obama the edge that he needs to take the House next year. As things stand now, Obama’s policy agenda is DOA. He wasn’t able to get his gun control measure even through the Senate, despite the Democrats being in control. Lose the House in 2014, and we will see two years of American history that may be the darkest days in our entire history.


  6. 6 | August 27, 2013 5:34 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Impeachment is just a fantasy.


  7. 7 | August 27, 2013 5:39 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Impeaching Obama will make him a hero. People who want this really need to think.


  8. lobo91
    8 | August 27, 2013 5:42 pm

    Indiana: Teenager Who Could Look Like Obama’s Son Rapes 93-Year-Old White Woman…

    Is Jackson “frowning” yet?


  9. 9 | August 27, 2013 5:43 pm

    @ Goldwaterite:

    Exzactly. I can’t think of a single thing Obama could do to more energize his base for the 2014 elections. Much better to leave him where he’s at and dismantle his policy agenda. I am certain that Obama would make it through an impeachment hearing. The Democrats wouldn’t even remove Bill Clinton. There is absolutely no way you get a single vote from a Democrat Senator. Not one.


  10. waldensianspirit
    10 | August 27, 2013 5:43 pm

    Well hang this warmongering around Obama supporters’ necks then


  11. BatGuano
    11 | August 27, 2013 5:43 pm

    @ Goldwaterite:
    Incompetence is not grounds for impeachment. Only high crimes and misdemeanors.


  12. lobo91
    12 | August 27, 2013 5:44 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    You wouldn’t even get all the Republicans.


  13. BatGuano
    13 | August 27, 2013 5:47 pm

    lobo91 wrote:

    You wouldn’t even get all the Republicans.

    But Mccain and Graham would… I see what you mean.


  14. waldensianspirit
    14 | August 27, 2013 5:48 pm

    Flashback: Biden Called For Bush To Be Impeached If He Bombed Iran Without Congressional Approval
    Apparently skin pigmentation makes it ok


  15. 15 | August 27, 2013 5:50 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Nope, you wouldn’t. They didn’t get all the Republcans on Clinton, either. Specter (at least) voted with the Democrats. The irony about that is that if they’d removed Clinton from Office, Al Gore would have likely won the 2000 election. He’d have had a couple of years as President to shore up the votes. As we saw, he wouldn’t have had to swing all that many people.


  16. waldensianspirit
  17. BatGuano
    17 | August 27, 2013 5:54 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Follow the money

    Follow my money. If you find it let me know.


  18. heysoos
    18 | August 27, 2013 5:56 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    Nope, you wouldn’t. They didn’t get all the Republcans on Clinton, either. Specter (at least) voted with the Democrats. The irony about that is that if they’d removed Clinton from Office, Al Gore would have likely won the 2000 election. He’d have had a couple of years as President to shore up the votes. As we saw, he wouldn’t have had to swing all that many people.

    pretty sad when Clinton won his Senate trial…he was guilty as hell


  19. waldensianspirit
    19 | August 27, 2013 5:56 pm

    @ BatGuano:
    I’ll run out of mine before I find yours


  20. waldensianspirit
    20 | August 27, 2013 5:57 pm

    We’re Doomed™


  21. waldensianspirit
  22. heysoos
    22 | August 27, 2013 5:59 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    We’re Doomed™

    pretty much


  23. 23 | August 27, 2013 6:06 pm

    @ heysoos:

    Oh, he was definately guilty. It is just that Democrats won’t vote to remove a Democrat from office. Obama would have the advantage of bein g the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT in addition to being a Democrat. I doubt you could get forty votes in the Senate, no matter what the percipitating action.


  24. 24 | August 27, 2013 6:07 pm

    @ BatGuano:

    Yup.


  25. waldensianspirit
    25 | August 27, 2013 6:07 pm

    Russian Official On Reports Obama Planning To Attack Syria: West Acting Like A “Monkey With A Hand Grenade”…

    Why are the Russians worked up over Lt Col West?

    you know this is their polished up statement

    West/Cruz ’16!


  26. 26 | August 27, 2013 6:10 pm

    @ Iron Fist:

    Obama right now is in a rut, this is the best we can hope for. If the GOP goes for impeachment, Obama gets sympathy and will go into full demagogue mode. he is a formidable campaigner and use impeachment to push his agenda.

    Obama is drowning politically, why give him a rope to improve his situation?


  27. 27 | August 27, 2013 6:11 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Yeah, I think that you’ll find when you are talking about late-term abortion that there is even less support for it. Yet the Democrats are absolutist on Abortion. It is interesting to me that, as in Texas recently,the Democrats vote against common-sense measures like requiring the person performing the abortion be a medical doctor, or parental notification laws, or even that abortion clinics meet a minimum standard of cleanliness. War on Women? Unsanitary conditions, and amature abortionists certainly isn’t putting “women’s health” first.


  28. waldensianspirit
    28 | August 27, 2013 6:11 pm

    A mirage rope


  29. waldensianspirit
    29 | August 27, 2013 6:14 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    I also think it is important to emphasis the male who’s enjoying the hanky-panky needs to pay for contraception and disposal of his biowaste; not the American taxpayer


  30. eaglesoars
    30 | August 27, 2013 6:15 pm

    back on topic.

    If Morrissey et al are refusing to engage in ‘racial tit for tat’ they need to find other careers. If an incident is racial, report if as such, if not then report that.

    Anything else is journalistic malpractice worthy of the MSM


  31. heysoos
    31 | August 27, 2013 6:17 pm

    Iron Fist wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    Oh, he was definately guilty. It is just that Democrats won’t vote to remove a Democrat from office. Obama would have the advantage of bein g the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT in addition to being a Democrat. I doubt you could get forty votes in the Senate, no matter what the percipitating action.

    I’ve never suggested impeaching he POTUS…it’s nothing but a popularity contest…senators just disregard the facts or decide that the charges are not serious enough…but the ABA knew he was guilty and pulled his licence…but cabinet members are a different story…I’d impeach Holder in a heartbeat


  32. heysoos
    32 | August 27, 2013 6:20 pm

    Goldwaterite wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Obama right now is in a rut, this is the best we can hope for. If the GOP goes for impeachment, Obama gets sympathy and will go into full demagogue mode. he is a formidable campaigner and use impeachment to push his agenda.
    Obama is drowning politically, why give him a rope to improve his situation?

    I surf a fair amount of news and don’t see any groundswell to impeach BO…some chatter is all…there is nothing to stick him with, except abuse of power but that’s all just in our minds, eh?


  33. RIX
    33 | August 27, 2013 6:21 pm

    I am sitting at an airport gate & they have CNN on.
    McCain just came on & he wants war! He is just sure that those Syrian Rebels are swell.


  34. waldensianspirit
    34 | August 27, 2013 6:21 pm

    Israel says Assad did it. Yet I wonder if they aren’t setting Obama up


  35. waldensianspirit
    35 | August 27, 2013 6:22 pm

    Being tired of Obama’s heap big talk about red lines and shit


  36. 36 | August 27, 2013 6:22 pm

    @ waldensianspirit:

    Actually, I am waiting for the paternity suiot where the guy gets out of paying for child support beccause he offerd to pay dfor the abortion. Men are completely marginalized in all but the most necessary of ways. A woman can abort your child without any input from you. Men generally can’t get a vasectomy without their wife’s approval.


  37. BatGuano
    37 | August 27, 2013 6:23 pm

    @ Iron Fist:
    Thanks to that absurd law that gave 18 year old’s the vote, I voted for Brown for governor of California in 1974. Bad decision. Too many children are voting. We need to go back to a 21 year old law at least or increase to 25 years.


  38. waldensianspirit
    38 | August 27, 2013 6:24 pm

    And getBatGuano wrote:

    increase to 25 years.

    Move with Obama’s insurance by parent limit


  39. heysoos
    39 | August 27, 2013 6:25 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Israel says Assad did it. Yet I wonder if they aren’t setting Obama up

    O doubt it, if they did it sure backfired on them…I don’t think they are that stupid


  40. eaglesoars
    40 | August 27, 2013 6:25 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Israel says Assad did it. Yet I wonder if they aren’t setting Obama up

    you gotta be kidding! Israel is going to get attacked if we bomb Syria. And that Iron Dome didn’t work so well.


  41. waldensianspirit
    41 | August 27, 2013 6:26 pm

    @ heysoos:
    They being Assad regime? If so the Israelis don’t mind if Obama steps in it


  42. eaglesoars
    42 | August 27, 2013 6:26 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Israel says Assad did it. Yet I wonder if they aren’t setting Obama up

    and Israel has the intercepts


  43. heysoos
    43 | August 27, 2013 6:26 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    @ Iron Fist:
    Thanks to that absurd law that gave 18 year old’s the vote, I voted for Brown for governor of California in 1974. Bad decision. Too many children are voting. We need to go back to a 21 year old law at least or increase to 25 years.

    if you pay income taxes you can vote, otherwise not…it’s the only way as I see it


  44. heysoos
    44 | August 27, 2013 6:27 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ heysoos:
    They being Assad regime? If so the Israelis don’t mind if Obama steps in it

    Iran is threatening Israel as we speak


  45. waldensianspirit
    46 | August 27, 2013 6:34 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    Iran is threatening Israel as we speak

    T’ould give reason to mix crap into their yellow cake


  46. heysoos
    47 | August 27, 2013 6:35 pm

    Syria is Irans proxy, Isreal is out proxy…
    we bomb Iran, they bomb Israel…
    everybody’s got their guns up,
    a Mexican standoff…BO is way over his head


  47. BatGuano
    48 | August 27, 2013 6:35 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    if you pay income taxes you can vote, otherwise not…it’s the only way as I see it

    The income tax was not in founders vision. If that is your standard for voting you must me very happy. The income tax was imposed upon us in 1913! Even at that time you had to be 21 to vote! The 18 year old vote came about in 1972. We are now living with the consequences. You obviously adhere to the dictum, “it’s the law, it’s right!”


  48. The Osprey
    49 | August 27, 2013 6:37 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Russian Official On Reports Obama Planning To Attack Syria: West Acting Like A “Monkey With A Hand Grenade”…
    Why are the Russians worked up over Lt Col West?

    You need to improve your reading comprehension.

    They are talking about “The West” i.e, The US, Britain, France, etc., not a person named West.


  49. heysoos
    50 | August 27, 2013 6:37 pm

    and BO is probably shitting his pants wishing he’d kept his damned mouth shut…Putin must be laughing his ass off


  50. heysoos
    51 | August 27, 2013 6:38 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    if you pay income taxes you can vote, otherwise not…it’s the only way as I see it
    The income tax was not in founders vision. If that is your standard for voting you must me very happy. The income tax was imposed upon us in 1913! Even at that time you had to be 21 to vote! The 18 year old vote came about in 1972. We are now living with the consequences. You obviously adhere to the dictum, “it’s the law, it’s right!”

    the deck is unnaturally stacked with deadbeats…what other solution is there?


  51. eaglesoars
    52 | August 27, 2013 6:39 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    and BO is probably shitting his pants wishing he’d kept his damned mouth shut…Putin must be laughing his ass off

    nah. he’ll hang out with Reggie and let Jarrett call the shots -- literally


  52. waldensianspirit
    53 | August 27, 2013 6:39 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    :mrgreen:

    read me again

    Purposefully obtuse because they in private certainly aren’t referring to the Western civilisation. Read wz’s note for a hint


  53. The Osprey
    54 | August 27, 2013 6:40 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    a Mexican standoff…BO is way over his head

    So who is the good, who is the bad, and who is the ugly? :lol:


  54. heysoos
    56 | August 27, 2013 6:45 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    one of the all time great westerns…
    nice catch


  55. BatGuano
    57 | August 27, 2013 6:45 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    the deck is unnaturally stacked with deadbeats…what other solution is there?

    I don’t know what that means.How about raising the voting age to 25? 200 years ago a 21 year old was a man with responsibilities and had some idea of what his vote meant. Today a 21 year old has no responsibilities and lives off a combination of his parents and the state.He/she should vote?


  56. The Osprey
    58 | August 27, 2013 6:45 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ The Osprey:

    read me again
    Purposefully obtuse because they in private certainly aren’t referring to the Western civilisation. Read wz’s note for a hint

    Well, I haven’t heard Allen West pounding the drums for Syrian intervention, so they must be calling someone else a monkey. ;)

    How long will it be before moonbats are protesting in front of the Russian embassy, chanting, “Racist, sexist, anti-gay, Vladimir Putin, go away”? :lol:


  57. waldensianspirit
    59 | August 27, 2013 6:46 pm

    So if Obama dispenses some cruise for 3 days and nights that’ll give the Russians reason to sell some weaponry and it may help keep a proportional mess in Syria lively


  58. The Osprey
    60 | August 27, 2013 6:47 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    one of the all time great westerns…
    nice catch

    New Mexico (and US Civil War) history quiz…what is the battle depicted in the movie?

    IIRC it took place about a 2 hour drive north of you…you are in Santa Fe, right?


  59. heysoos
    61 | August 27, 2013 6:48 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    the deck is unnaturally stacked with deadbeats…what other solution is there?
    I don’t know what that means.How about raising the voting age to 25? 200 years ago a 21 year old was a man with responsibilities and had some idea of what his vote meant. Today a 21 year old has no responsibilities and lives off a combination of his parents and the state.He/she should vote?

    it means the donks breed their votes, the impervious 47% with no skin in the game except the dole


  60. waldensianspirit
    62 | August 27, 2013 6:48 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    :mrgreen:


  61. eaglesoars
    63 | August 27, 2013 6:49 pm

    heh

    Syrian Electronic Army hacks NYT


  62. heysoos
    64 | August 27, 2013 6:49 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    loosely based on Glorietta Pass, the last time we threw Texas out of here!


  63. heysoos
    65 | August 27, 2013 6:50 pm

    @ The Osprey:
    I’m in Albuquerque


  64. waldensianspirit
  65. The Osprey
    67 | August 27, 2013 6:52 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    So if Obama dispenses some cruise for 3 days and nights that’ll give the Russians reason to sell some weaponry and it may help keep a proportional mess in Syria lively

    PREZ dispenses sweet little lies.


  66. The Osprey
    68 | August 27, 2013 6:52 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    @ The Osprey:
    loosely based on Glorietta Pass, the last time we threw Texas out of here!

    LOL, yep.


  67. BatGuano
    69 | August 27, 2013 6:53 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    t means the donks breed their votes, the impervious 47% with no skin in the game except the dole

    I still have no idea what you are saying. Can someone here interpret?
    What does, “except the dole” mean.


  68. waldensianspirit
    70 | August 27, 2013 6:54 pm

    @ BatGuano:
    About the same thing as BatGuano wrote:

    Today a 21 year old has no responsibilities and lives off a combination of his parents and the state.


  69. BatGuano
    71 | August 27, 2013 6:54 pm

    heysoos wrote:

    I’m in Albuquerque
    repl

    A sentence I understand.


  70. waldensianspirit
    72 | August 27, 2013 6:57 pm

    Shocker: Al Jazeera America’s Opening Week Ratings A Bust, Highest Rated Show Draws Only 54,000 Viewers…

    I’m posting a lot of wz but they keep putting up good ones. 54k viewers!


  71. BatGuano
    73 | August 27, 2013 7:01 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    @ BatGuano:
    About the same thing as BatGuano wrote:
    Today a 21 year old has no responsibilities and lives off a combination of his parents and the state.

    I think I get. “Someone” confused the word “except” with “accept.”


  72. eaglesoars
    74 | August 27, 2013 7:06 pm

    off to do some reading


  73. BatGuano
    75 | August 27, 2013 7:08 pm

    eaglesoars wrote:

    off to do some reading

    Me too. I need to read the Urban Dictionary to keep up with with the arguments here.


  74. eaglesoars
    76 | August 27, 2013 7:11 pm

    wait a sec. I just saw a clip of MLK giving his I Have a Dream speech. Who the hell was that standing behind him? a bunch of black guys in white dress and caps. Looked like Calypso Louie guys???


  75. 77 | August 27, 2013 7:11 pm

    In my reading of the news it appears that the world in in a run up to a Third World War. The sequence of events is so similar to the events prior to the initiation of the First and Second World Wars.

    All it will take now is some idiot who would rather commit a murder than finish his sandwich.

    STOP OBAMA NOW!

    http://lesbates.blogspot.com/2013/08/thought-for-for-day.html


  76. BatGuano
    78 | August 27, 2013 7:12 pm

    @ eaglesoars:
    I saw the same thing. Black muslims, like Ali?


  77. huckfunn
    79 | August 27, 2013 7:14 pm

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Shocker: Al Jazeera America’s Opening Week Ratings A Bust, Highest Rated Show Draws Only 54,000 Viewers…

    I’m posting a lot of wz but they keep putting up good ones. 54k viewers!

    It warms my heart to see Al Gorezeera battling MSNBC for the bottom of the barrel.


  78. eaglesoars
    80 | August 27, 2013 7:16 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    Black muslims, like Ali?

    looked lik it

    ok I’m off


  79. heysoos
    81 | August 27, 2013 7:50 pm

    BatGuano wrote:

    heysoos wrote:
    t means the donks breed their votes, the impervious 47% with no skin in the game except the dole
    I still have no idea what you are saying. Can someone here interpret?
    What does, “except the dole” mean.

    government dole, free stuff, handouts, welfare and Obamaphones


  80. lobo91
    82 | August 27, 2013 8:06 pm

    Ralph Peters is calling O’Reilly out on his idiotic support of attacking Syria.

    I’m glad someone is.


  81. brookly red
    83 | August 27, 2013 8:21 pm

    huckfunn wrote:

    waldensianspirit wrote:

    Shocker: Al Jazeera America’s Opening Week Ratings A Bust, Highest Rated Show Draws Only 54,000 Viewers…

    I’m posting a lot of wz but they keep putting up good ones. 54k viewers!

    It warms my heart to see Al Gorezeera battling MSNBC for the bottom of the barrel.

    al-jizz is very dangerous, the camel’s nose is in our tent.


  82. 84 | August 27, 2013 8:21 pm

    @ lobo91:

    He’s one of the few speaking the truth.


  83. 85 | August 27, 2013 8:23 pm

    New Thread.


  84. brookly red
    86 | August 27, 2013 8:23 pm

    The Other Les wrote:

    In my reading of the news it appears that the world in in a run up to a Third World War. The sequence of events is so similar to the events prior to the initiation of the First and Second World Wars.

    All it will take now is some idiot who would rather commit a murder than finish his sandwich.

    STOP OBAMA NOW!

    http://lesbates.blogspot.com/2013/08/thought-for-for-day.html

    I hate to break it to ya but the third world war has been going on for some time


  85. lobo91
    87 | August 27, 2013 8:28 pm

    Goldwaterite wrote:

    @ lobo91:
    He’s one of the few speaking the truth.

    Peters and Hunt both told him he was completely wrong.

    O’Reilly even tried to compare Syria to Hitler invading Poland.


  86. 88 | August 27, 2013 8:46 pm

    @ lobo91:

    Unreal.


Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David