► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘History’ Category

Washington DC considers $250K Insurance Policy for Gun Owners

by Rodan ( 85 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Fascism, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Second Amendment, The Constitution at May 17th, 2013 - 11:30 am

Despite Obama and OFA’s spectacular defeat at the hands of the NRA, The Progressives have not given up on Gun Control. They are enacting laws at the local level to restrict American’s Constitutional civil rights to bear arms. Washington DC is now looking to add another hurdle to Gun ownership. They are contemplating forcing gun owners to get a $250,000 insurance to own a gun. The average person can not afford this, thus an end run around the Supreme Court’s Heller case.

WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) — Two D.C. councilmembers said Thursday that they support some form of mandate that gun owners carry liability insurance, but they would have to overcome the objections of Mayor Vincent Gray for the District of Columbia to become the nation’s first jurisdiction to require such coverage.

Councilmembers Vincent Orange and Mary Cheh said after a hearing Thursday that any bill they pursue would likely be narrower than Cheh’s initial proposal, which includes a requirement that gun owners insure themselves against intentional as well as accidental shootings

At least a half-dozen states are considering insurance requirements for gun owners, although none of the bills has made it past the hearing stage.

[....]

The district has some of the strictest gun-control laws in the nation. Handguns were banned outright in the nation’s capital until a landmark 2008 Supreme Court ruling, and since then, about 2,000 people have legally purchased firearms. The 13-member council includes 11 Democrats and two left-leaning independents, potentially making the city fertile territory for those pushing an insurance mandate.

This is a disturbing development and end run around people’s Constitutional Rights.

American ambassadors have gone from untouchable to dead

by Speranza ( 148 Comments › )
Filed under History, Libya, World War II at May 14th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

An attack on an American Ambassador ought to be considered an attack on an American president and treated as an act of war.

by Shmuley Boteach

I just finished one of the best books I’ve read in a long time: In the Garden of Beasts by Erik Larson. The book tells the story of William Dodd, President Roosevelt’s first ambassador to Hitler, and chronicles the slow descent of Germany into Nazi tyranny. One of the most striking features of the narrative is the fear that slowly descends on the German populace as they become terrified of expressing an opinion about Hitler and his police state, even in the company of close family and friends.

Yet Dodd and his family were utterly immune to such fear. Though they lived in a home that was owned by a Jewish banker; regularly hosted journalists who wrote critically of Hitler; drove by the home of Franz von Papen – the deputy chancellor – to show their support even after he had been placed under house arrest by Hitler for his Marburg speech of June, 1934; though Dodd openly snubbed Hitler every year by refusing to attend the Nazi Nuremberg rally where Hitler was celebrated as a god, Dodd never had anything to fear.

He did not have to worry that the SA would ransack his Berlin home in the middle of the night. He did not have to fear that his daughter Martha, who even had an affair with Gestapo head Rudolf Diels, would be summarily shot for her increasing disillusionment with Hitler’s regime. [.......] And he did not have fear that roaming bands of Nazi thugs would attack him for his protests to the German foreign minister against unprovoked attacks that threatened the lives of Americans.

And why didn’t he fear? Because even a monster as evil as Hitler, arguably the most dangerous man that ever lived, wasn’t going to mess with the American ambassador.

In fact, one of the stories told in the book is of the day Dodd took a walk with French ambassador André François-Poncet in the Tiergarten, when the latter told him he would not be surprised if he were shot in the street by the SS. Dodd was astonished. It had never occurred to him to worry; he was the American ambassador.

Indeed, Hitler and the Nazis never harassed Western ambassadors.

It therefore matters that just 80 years later a bunch of terrorist thugs think they can murder an American ambassador, in full sight of the world, without consequence.

American diplomatic staff were once the safest people in the world, representatives of a superpower that would rain hell from the skies should you touch one.  [......]

The revelations coming out of the Congressional hearings on Benghazi, Libya – such as that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack, cleansing them of any mention of al-Qaida and terrorism – are a travesty and demonstrate a lack of moral will to call evil by its proper name.

ABC News and Fox News reported this past Friday that the department’s talking points were revised fully 12 times to purge them of any mention of terrorism. State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland asked the CIA to remove mention of their own security warnings about Benghazi. According to ABC News the original paragraph read, “The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qaida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. [......]

We cannot rule out [that] individuals [have] previously surveilled… US facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.”

But Nuland was concerned that the line “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that, either?” I have earlier written about how ambassador Susan Rice was an utterly inappropriate choice as secretary of state based on her efforts to disassociate the word “genocide” from the Rwandan mass slaughters of 1994 so as not to commit the Clinton administration to intervention. In a 2001 article published in The Atlantic, Samantha Power, author of the Pulitzer-Prize winning A Problem of Hell and arguably the world’s foremost voice against genocide, who currently serves on the National Security Council as an aide to President Obama, referred to Ambassador Susan Rice and her colleagues in the Clinton administration as “Bystanders to Genocide.”

[........]

Worse, the attempt to whitewash the Benghazi attacks and describe them merely as “a protest that turned violent” trivializes the death of ambassador Chris Stevens and the three Americans murdered with him, and threatens to cheapen the life of every American diplomat currently serving in a dangerous post.

We need to accept that the fear the United States once instilled in those with evil intent against our diplomatic staff has worn thin and the only way to reintroduce that fear is to understand fully what happened in Benghazi, and to rain fire on the culprits so that this never happens again

Read he rest - American ambassadors: from untouchable to dead

My colleague at CBS was a Communist spy

by Speranza ( 185 Comments › )
Filed under Cold War, Communism, History, Media at May 13th, 2013 - 2:00 pm

Wow, I remember Winston Burdett very well from the late 1960′s and  1970′s. He had such an impressive speaking voice, was soft spoken and came across like a knowledgeable and popular small town college history professor.

hat tip – Powerline

by Paul Miller

LIKE EVERY other American born since 1950, I was raised on some very basic and universally acknowledged notions of our country’s history.

Near the top of the list of things written in stone was that the McCarthy era was a shameful period of paranoid witchhunting and blacklisting based on fabricated or imagined allegations, and that the man it was named for, former Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy, was one of our greatest villains — a man who saw communists everywhere he looked, and who publicly vilified hordes of perfectly innocent people and ruined their lives for no other reason than his own personal gratification.

What a surprise, then, to find out that one of the most prominent broadcasters of the McCarthy era, and a man I looked up to 25 years later when he was at the height of his career and I was just a kid hanging around the CBS newsroom, had actually been a spy for Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin.

A real spy for the USSR? Was that even possible?

The newsman’s name was Winston Burdett, and for many years he was a familiar, comforting presence on the radio and on the “CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite,” reporting from Rome, where he especially gained distinction for his coverage of the Vatican.

To me, as a young assistant editor on the CBS News foreign desk from 1977 to 1981, he was a friendly, but intimidating, voice on the other end of numerous international telephone calls.  [........]

Burdett was just one of the broadcasting giants who had me in awe. There was Walter Cronkite, of course, whose program I nominally worked for, but who only spoke five or six words to me in the three-and-a-half years I toiled no more than 30 feet from his desk. The other old-timers were friendlier. Douglas Edwards, Charles Collingwood, Eric Sevareid, Dallas Townsend, etc., etc. — these men had actually worked with Edward R. Murrow, for God’s sake.  [........]

I don’t remember the McCarthy era coming up much, but if it did, it could only have been with scorn. Nobody mentioned that one of the people we put on the air every day had worked, in his youth, to help overthrow the government of the United States in favor of “the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

It wasn’t that Burdett’s role was a secret. He admitted it — first, in a letter to his bosses at CBS in March 1951, and later to the FBI and in testimony to a congressional committee. But 25 years later, with the McCarthy era neatly put in its “national embarrassment” cubbyhole — an era of hyperventilated accusations, not actual spying — nobody talked about it, and Burdett was allowed to continue his broadcasting career in peace.  [.......]

Secrets revealed

The 1990s, however, also happened to be the time when quite a few of the Soviet Union’s secrets started to emerge. The USSR collapsed in 1990, and there was brief access to some of its Stalin-era espionage archives. In 1993, a former KGB officer, Alexander Vassiliev, was permitted to copy some of those documents, which he turned into a book, “Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America.”

And in 1995, the United States declassified more than 2,500 cables which had been intercepted in the 1940s and early 1950s between Soviet agents in this country and their handlers in Moscow. Decoding those cables had been called the Venona Project, and several books examined their revelations in detail, including “Venona — Decoding Soviet Espionage in America,” by John Haynes and Harvey Klehr.

Lo and behold, the secrets that were suddenly spilling out of Moscow and Washington revealed that Joseph McCarthy and his supporters, while they unfairly targeted some people who were innocent, actually grossly underestimated the extent of Soviet espionage in the U.S. government. Alger Hiss, Julius Rosenberg, Klaus Fuchs, Harry Dexter White, Laughlin Currie and Laurence Duggan were just the most prominent names among hundreds of American citizens who not only gave Moscow the atom bomb, but a very long list of other diplomatic, military and industrial secrets, helping Stalin enslave his own people, send millions to their deaths by violence or starvation, conquer Eastern Europe, start the Korean War, and nearly bring the world to a nuclear Armageddon. And these American traitors did so not because they were paid, but because they believed Soviet communism was a better form of government than American capitalism and democracy, and they wanted it to succeed and spread.

Even during the notorious period from August 1939 to June 1941 — when Stalin had a peace pact with Hitler, helped himself to half of Poland, and made it possible for the Nazis to conquer Europe and launch the Holocaust — the Americans stayed loyal to the communist dictator.

It was in the book by Haynes and Klehr that the name Winston Burdett popped up. The book revealed that in 1937, as a young reporter for a left-wing newspaper called the Brooklyn Eagle, Burdett joined the Communist Party of the USA, which was controlled and funded by Moscow, and which was used to attract supporters among the American public, and especially from its universities and labor unions. The CPUSA was also used to recruit spies, and Burdett soon agreed to become one.

According to the declassified Venona documents, he was told by his handlers to volunteer for an assignment for the Brooklyn Eagle to Finland, where he would pretend to be a disinterested journalist, but where he would actually gather intelligence to help the USSR defeat Finland after the Soviets invaded it in November 1939. Later, with World War II raging across the European continent, Burdett also travelled to Romania, Turkey and other front-line countries on behalf of the Soviet government.

[........]

But Burdett’s past haunted him. In 1951, CBS was under pressure to purge its ranks of known communists, and the network’s owner, Bill Paley, asked every employee to sign a “loyalty oath,” disclosing whether he had ever been a “member of a group which advocated the overthrow of our constitutional form of government, or which has adopted a policy approving of acts of violence to deny other persons their rights under the United States Constitution, or of seeking to alter the form of government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

‘An idealistic guise’

For most employees, having to answer such a question was a silly annoyance. But Burdett’s answer to the momentous question on the CBS loyalty oath was, “Yes.”

He had joined the communist Party in 1937 when he was 24 years old, he said in an accompanying letter to his CBS bosses, because “to a young person, Communist notions present themselves in an idealistic guise.”

Since then, he said, communism had become “as abhorrent to me as anyone I know,” but that he had only realized after his period of youthful foolishness what the Communist Party was “in fact, all about, and how dishonest it was, both morally and intellectually.”

He apologized for embarrassing CBS, but he also called his story “rather banal,” and said his activities as a communist union activist had been harmless. In fact, he was covering his tracks: Only later did he admit to the FBI and to a Congressional committee that he had been much more than a simple member of the Communist Party; he had been a hostile spy in the middle of a war.

In his 1955 congressional testimony, Burdett made a full confession and identified numerous other members of the Communist Party of the USA in the 1930s, including some in prominent positions in the media, academia and politics. Because he “came clean,” CBS decided not to fire him, and it may have been the furor over naming names that led to his exile to the Rome bureau for the rest of his career.  [.......]

As the decades passed, what had been a notorious story in the 1950s was forgotten. On a recent trip to New York, I asked several of my CBS colleagues in the 1970s who also knew Burdett whether they’d ever heard anything about his espionage career.

They all said, “No.”

[.......]

Read the rest -  When you find out your colleague was a Communist spy

Pope Canonizes Hundreds who refused to covert to Islam

by Rodan ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, History, Islam, Religion, Special Report at May 12th, 2013 - 10:20 pm

Islam is Catholicism’s #1 enemy since the 7th Century. The wars between Catholics and Islam had raged for centuries. Many Catholics were killed by the Islamic savages. Pope Francis I canonizes hundreds of Italian Catholics who in 1480 refused to covert to Islam when Turks seized the city of Otranto.

(TheBlaze/AP) — Pope Francis on Sunday bestowed sainthood upon hundreds of 15th-century martyrs beheaded for refusing to convert to Islam as part of his first canonization ceremony in a packed St. Peter’s Square.

The “Martyrs of Otranto” were 813 Italians who were slain in the southern Italian city in 1480 for defying demands by Turkish invaders who overran the citadel to renounce Christianity.

[....]

Francis told the crowd that the martyrs are a source of inspiration, especially for “so many Christians, who, right in these times and in so many parts of the world, still suffer violence.” He prayed that they receive “the courage of loyalty and to respond to evil with good.”

The pope didn’t single out any country. But Christian churches have been attacked in Nigeria and Iraq, and Catholics in China loyal to the Vatican have been subject to harassment and sometimes jail over the last decades.

I salute the Pope on this move and recognition of the current Islamic persecution of Christians.

Germany’s World War II Occupation of Poland: ‘When we finish, nobody is left alive’

by Speranza ( 183 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Communism, Germany, History, Holocaust, Nazism, Poland, World War II at May 9th, 2013 - 7:00 pm

As the author states, the Nazis turned Poland into one vast cemetery. Hitler’s hatred of the Slavs was only surpassed by his hatred of the Jews and for 6 years Poland endured one nightmare after another. No other nation (outside of modern day Israel) has been stuck in such a terrible and dangerous neighborhood as Poland was – caught between Adolf Hitler on the West and Northeast (East Prussia) and Joseph Stalin in the East. Nevertheless Poland’s soldiers fought heroically in 1939 (it was a myth that Polish cavalry attacked German tanks with lances) and throughout World War II in the Battle of France, during the Battle of Britain (as pilots), in the Middle East and North Africa, at Monte Cassino in Italy (the Poles and French finally took the monastery and to this day the entire back of Monte Cassino is one vast Polish war cemetery), in Normandy and at Arnhem. Add in the heroic but doomed Warsaw Uprising of August 1944 and Poland’s 20th century history is one  of betrayal and heroism. As a side note, let us not forget the Polish defeat of the Red Army in 1920 at the Battle of Warsaw which probably saved Central Europe from Communism.

In Prague, big red posters were put up on which one could read that seven Czechs had been shot today. I said to myself, ‘If I had to put up a poster for every seven Poles shot, the forests of Poland would not be sufficient to manufacture the paper.’

Hans Frank, 1940

Governor-General of occupied Poland’s ‘General Government‘ territory.

by Michael Sontheimer

Adolf Hitler left no doubt about his goal before he ordered the invasion of Poland. Addressing generals and commanders at a reception he gave at his Berchtesgaden retreat on August 22, 1939, Hitler said he was not interested “in reaching a specific line or a new border.” He wanted “the destruction of the enemy.”

On September 1, 1939, German soldiers marched across the border into neighboring Poland. The vastly superior Wehrmacht forces advanced so quickly that the Polish government was forced to flee to Romania just 16 days later. On September 27, the defenders of the Polish capital, Warsaw, gave up. Nine days later, the last remaining Polish troops laid down their weapons.

Thus begun a nightmarish occupation that would last more than five years. In Poland, the Nazis had more time than in any other occupied country to implement their policies against people they classified as “racially inferior.”

The task of implementing Hitler’s plan fell to Hans Frank, a 39-year-old lawyer, Nazi Party member and brutal champion of the Nazis’ vision of racial purity. Frank was named “Governor-General” of a large chunk of Poland, an area of about 95,000 square kilometers (36,680sq mi), with approximately 10 million inhabitants. This was the western part of Poland that had been annexed by the German Reich, while the eastern half of the country was occupied by the Red Army in accordance with the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, the 1939 non-aggression treaty between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

War Crimes Committed from the Outset

Frank was unashamedly proud of his ruthless regime, which contrasted with the comparatively lenient system of rule in the “Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia,” as the Nazis called the majority ethnic-Czech region they had occupied. In 1940, Frank told a reporter for the Völkische Beobachter newspaper: “In Prague, for example, large red posters were hung up announcing that seven Czechs had been executed that day.” That had made him think: “If I had to hang up a poster every time we shot seven Poles, we’d have to cut down all the Polish forests, and we still wouldn’t be able to produce enough paper for all the posters I’d need.”

German soldiers committed war crimes in Poland from the very outset. One soldier in the 41st infantry division noted, “Polish civilians and soldiers are dragged out everywhere. When we finish our operation, the entire village is on fire. Nobody is left alive, also all the dogs were shot.”

Wehrmacht soldiers without battle experience thought they saw snipers everywhere, and ended up firing at anything that moved — often their own comrades. And if Polish soldiers merely shot at them, the Germans took revenge by setting entire villages ablaze or taking hostages and executing them.

[........]

Although Jews weren’t persecuted systematically during the “Polish campaign,” the anti-Semitism of the German troops surfaced time and again. The war diary of one machine gun battalion noted, “All the male inhabitants are standing under guard in a large square. The only exceptions are the Jews, who are not standing, but have been made to kneel and pray constantly.”

On the very day the last Polish soldiers gave themselves up, Hitler gave a speech to the German parliament, the Reichstag, promising to “reorganize the ethnographic conditions” in Europe. Hitler appointed SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler to carry out this project, whereupon Himmler was named Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood.

Plan for German Colonization up to the Urals

Himmler had his staff draw up an Eastern General Plan, a blueprint for the German colonization of all areas up to the Urals. After all, as Joseph Goebbels claimed, eastern Europe had always been Germany’s “destiny.” The propaganda minister predicted, “Tough peasant races will stand guard in the East.” SS leader Reinhard Heydrich said German settlers would act as a bulwark against the “raging tides of Asia.”

He wanted the annexed parts of western Poland to be “depolonized” and “germanized” as quickly as possible. To this end, some eight million Jews and Poles were to be moved into the General Government, the area of Poland under Nazi military control. Their places were to be taken by ethnic Germans “repatriated” from around the Baltic and from Volhynia and Galicia in western Ukraine.

[.......]

The people deported to the General Government were only permitted to carry one suitcase each, as well as “one blanket per Pole.” Beds had to be left behind. Securities and valuables could not be taken — “wedding rings excepted.”

Himmler ordered all those living in the annexed eastern zones to be classified by race. The list of alleged “Germanic peoples” divided ethnic Germans into four groups. These ranged from those who identified themselves as German and were thus naturalized immediately, to Poles considered “capable of germanization,” who were deported for so-called “training” in the Altreich (Old Empire), as the Nazis called the area under German control before 1939. Such Poles were thus given German citizenship on a probationary basis.

A Nation of Slaves

The Nazis’ aim was to transform the Poles into a nation of slaves. In May 1940 Himmler wrote that “the non-German peoples of the East may not receive any education beyond four-year elementary school.” Their educational goal was to be as follows: “The ability to do simple sums no higher than 500, write their name, and understand that it is their divine duty to obey Germans, be honest, diligent and well-behaved.” The SS Reichsführer did not consider reading an essential element of the Polish curriculum.

In October 1940 Hitler ordered “all members of the Polish intelligentsia” to be killed. SS leader Heydrich therefore instructed the heads of the security police task forces to ensure that the remaining members of the Polish “political leadership” be “rendered harmless and placed in a concentration camp.” He also saw to it that lists of “teachers, clergymen, noblemen, legionaries, returning officers, etc.” were drawn up immediately.

[........]

In the fall of 1939, occupied Poland became a nightmare of often spontaneous and wanton terror. For instance, the head of Radom district threatened the death penalty for anyone caught felling trees in the forest for use as firewood. Throughout the country, the SS and the police slaughtered all those they considered to be Polish nationalists. The race-based expulsions and resettlement carried out by Himmler’s henchmen sowed fear, unrest and chaos.

Creation of Jewish Ghettos

But the Jews would soon be the main focus of the Nazis’ attention. Poland’s Jews were forced to wear white armbands with a blue Star of David almost two years before Jews in the Altreich were made to sew yellow stars on their clothes. As early as September 21, 1939, Heydrich decreed that “the Jewry” in the areas under his control were to be “concentrated in ghettos for easier control and subsequent expulsion.”

The occupiers set up the first major ghetto in Lodz, which they renamed Litzmannstadt, in the “Reich District of Wartheland” (also known as the Warthegau), where 3.7 million Poles and 400,000 Jews were resettled for “germanization.” In late April 1940, regional governor Friedrich Uebelhoer had 144,000 Jews corralled into an area of just 4 square kilometers (1 sq mi). As a result, the people in Lodz ghetto had to live six to a room on average.

In mid-November 1940, the Nazis set up the Warsaw ghetto, into which they packed at least half a million people. Very soon, more that 5,000 people a month were dying of hunger, typhoid and other infectious diseases in this “Jewish reservation.”

[.......]

The creation of Lviv ghetto in late 1941 more-or-less completed the imprisonment of Poland’s Jews, who could now be given “special treatment,” as their systematic annihilation was officially termed.

“The Jewish problem must be solved during the war because this is the only way it can be completed without a general global hullabaloo,” wrote Franz Rademacher, the diplomat who headed the “Jewish department” of the German foreign ministry. Although no written order has ever been found in which Hitler ordered the “final solution of the Jewish problem,” there is much evidence to suggest that the Fuhrer decided to wipe out the European Jewry in the fall of 1941.

‘We Have to Destroy the Jews Wherever We Find Them’

In mid-December of that year, Governor-General Frank told his cabinet in Krakow that he had asked Berlin what was going to be done with the Jews. The reply had allegedly been: “Liquidate them yourself.” Frank therefore announced, “Gentlemen, I would ask you to steel yourself against any thoughts of compassion. We have to destroy the Jews wherever we find them.”

Measures were quickly put into place to carry out this genocide. The SS had the first extermination camp built in Chelmno near Lodz in November 1941. To this they had added the slaughterhouses of Auschwitz, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka and Majdanek by the summer of 1942. The lack of technology for large-scale killing initially proved the biggest problem. At first the SS locked Jews in sealed trucks and poisoned them with exhaust fumes, but that wasn’t considered quick enough.

SS researchers eventually hit upon a more satisfactory procedure whereby Soviet prisoners-of-war and Poles in Auschwitz were poisoned using the pesticide Zyklon B, which contains cyanide. In this way, the SS murdered more than a million people at the Auschwitz-Birkenau extermination camp alone. Rings, coins and tooth fillings from the victims were melted down, enabling Himmler’s men to send a phenomenal 33 metric tons of gold to the Reichsbank in Berlin.

[........]

Nevertheless, sympathy and solidarity with the Jews were more widespread in Poland than anti-Semitism. Tens of thousands of Jews in the General Government survived the occupation, most of them hidden by fellow Poles, even though the Nazis typically shot all the members of any family found to be harboring Jews.

Even minor offenses led to Poles being sent to Germany as forced laborers. In this way, more than two million people were enslaved.

Resistance Groups in the Forests

From the very beginning, the Nazis’ policy toward occupied Poland was beset by an intractable contradiction: You can’t destroy what you want to exploit. This dilemma became all too clear after Himmler ordered the city of Lublin and Zamosc district in southeastern Poland to be made a German “settlement area” within the General Government.

In November 1942, police officers began brutally evacuating more than 100,000 Polish farmers to make way for 20,000 ethnic Germans. Those fit for work were sent to Germany as slave laborers, old people and children were resettled in so-called “retirement villages,” while anyone deemed “inferior” or “unreliable” was deported to Auschwitz.

[........]

The defeat of the Wehrmacht forces besieging the Russian city of Stalingrad in January 1943 lifted the hopes of resistance fighters across Poland. On April 20, 1943, Governor-General Frank complained to the German head of chancellery: “The murder of Germans is increasing to an alarming degree. Trains are being attacked, and transport routes are being made unsafe.”

Warsaw Ghetto Uprising

The day before, posters had appeared on the walls of the Warsaw ghetto: “Brothers, the time has come to fight and take revenge on our occupiers. If you can bear arms, come and join our fighters! The elderly and women can provide support. Arm yourselves!” Unfortunately, weapons were in short supply. Only about a tenth of the approximately 1,200 insurgents had a gun, yet they soon found themselves up against almost 2,000 heavily-armed police officers and SS men.

The Germans even used flame-throwers on the Jewish resistance fighters. For a month, insurgents waged a desperate guerrilla war on their occupiers. Several thousand Jews were executed immediately. About 50,000 more died in the Treblinka gas chambers. On May 16, 1943, Jürgen Stroop, the SS officer in charge of Warsaw district, reported: “The former Jewish residential district of Warsaw no longer exists.”

The Nazis answered stiffer resistance with yet more brutality. Between October 1943 and July 1944, a total of 2,705 Poles were publicly executed in Warsaw. Another 4,000 were killed in secret.

Nevertheless, Governor-General Frank realized that the Germans were at a numeric disadvantage and could not keep the Poles under their thumb indefinitely. He conceded that “this negative, disapproving, destructive approach is now almost impossible to maintain.” [.......]

In a letter to Hitler, Frank raise doubts about the closing of schools as well as the mass arrests and executions by the German police. Referring to the Soviet massacre of more than 20,000 Polish officers and other professionals and academics in Katyn in 1940, Frank proposed the Poles be “actively involved in the defense against Bolshevism.” However Hitler refused to entertain any such notion, preferring ruthless brute force instead. In January 1944 loyal, obedient Frank therefore issued an order that a hundred Poles were to be executed for every German killed.

Another occupation-era tragedy occurred on August 1 that summer, when the Armia Krajowa — the home guard of the Polish government-in-exile — staged an armed uprising in an attempt to recapture Warsaw ahead of the arrival of the Red Army. Emboldened by the attempted assassination of Adolf Hitler on July 20 and the successful “D-Day” landing of Allied forces in Normandy on June 6, Polish patriots believed they could force the Germans to withdraw from Warsaw.

The insurgents managed to liberate the half of Warsaw west of the River Vistula, but the occupiers struck back with brutal might. Although the Soviets had already reached the eastern banks of the Vistula, they wanted to secure their positions before pressing on.

‘A Nation of Such Courage is Immortal’

Himmler, whom Hitler had tasked with quelling the rebellion, had the SS shoot civilians at random until ammunition began running low. The Germans then launched an offensive in which nearly 40,000 men were sent after the rebels holed up in the old town. Bitter house-to-house fighting ensued, but the insurgents lacked experience, weapons and ammunition.

More than 150,000 people died in the battle for the city. Before they eventually capitulated after 63 days, the Polish home guard sent out one last radio message from Warsaw: “A nation of such courage is immortal.”

[.......] Of the 35 million people who had lived in Poland at the start of the War, six million had perished — almost 18 percent of the population.

Red Army soldiers entered Krakow, the capital of the General Government, on January 17, 1945.

Frank’s official diary contains the following entry for that day: “The Governor-General left Krakow castle in a motorcade in splendid winter weather and brilliant sunshine.” On the journey back to his native Bavaria, Frank and three of his staff burnt most of the official files they had taken with them.

After the War, Frank was brought before the Nuremberg Trials, accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. In a moment of enlightenment he admitted, “In a thousand years, people will still be blaming Germany.”

But in his closing remarks, Frank complained about the “most horrific mass crimes” allegedly committed against Germans in the East, acts which he said “easily match any guilt on our part.”

Frank was found guilty, and sent to the gallows.

Read the rest – ‘When we finish, nobody is left alive’

With the rise of the National Socialist Jobbik Party, Hungarian Jews fear for their safety

by Speranza ( 146 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Holocaust, Iran, Israel at May 8th, 2013 - 7:00 am

Unfortunately  a lot  of the feelings expressed by the  Jobbik Party are reflected to a different extent  by the more “mainstream” political parties throughout Europe.

by Colin Freeman

As the self-declared “capital” of the ultra-nationalist Jobbik Party, the town of Tiszavasvári prides itself on being a showcase for how the whole of Hungary might one day look.

Since winning control of Tiszavasvári’s local council three years ago on a pledge to fight “Gipsy crime”, the party has been on a vigorous clean-up campaign, banning prostitution, tidying the streets, and keeping a watchful eye on the shabby Roma districts at the edge of town. It even swore in its own Jobbik “security force” to work alongside the police, only for the uniformed militia, which drew comparisons with Hitler’s brown-shirts, to be banned by Hungary’s national government.

Yet Gipsies are not the only bogeyman that Jobbik has in its sights, as a sign on the well-trimmed green opposite the Communist-era mayoralty building suggests. Written in both Hungarian and Persian, it proudly announces that Tiszavasvári is twinned with Ardabil, a town in the rugged mountains of north-west Iran.

Gabor Vona delivers a speech during a rally against the World Jewish Congress Plenary Assembly in Budapest (Reuters)

On the face of it, there is no obvious reason why a drab rustbelt town in Hungary’s former mining area should seek links to a city in a hardline Islamic Republic 2,000 miles away. But this is no ordinary cultural exchange programme, and friendship has very little to do with it. Instead, the real purpose of Jobbik’s links to Iran is to show their mutual loathing of the Jewish state of Israel, which the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, notoriously declared should be “wiped from the pages of history”.

[........]

In many other countries in Europe, such a scheme might be dismissed as just petty town hall posturing, a Far right version of the “Loony Left” gesture politics practised in British town halls in the 1980s. But it is particularly sensitive in Hungarian towns like Tiszavasvári, where anti-semitism has seen Jews wiped from the pages of history once before.

Inquiries by The Sunday Telegraph via official Holocaust archives show a dozen names of Jewish victims from Tiszavasvári, part of the mass extermination programme that gave Jews in the Hungarian countryside only a one in ten chance of survival in 1944, Some simply disappeared, while others like Andor Krausz, a 30-year-old bookbinder, and Rozsi Gruenweld, a 48-year-old shoe merchant, were murdered in Auschwitz, along with among more than 400,000 other Hungarian Jews.

A Jobbik supporter, the tattoo reads ‘My Honor is Loyalty’ (Reuters)

It was one of the most intensive anti-Jewish campaigns of Holocaust, and while it was conducted during Hungary’s period of Nazi occupation, it was done with the active connivance of the Hungarian state.

” You can see Jobbik’s true nature through this,” said Peter Feldmajer, the President of the Federation of Hungarian Jewish Communities, which today represents an estimated 100,000 Hungarian Jews, nearly 90 per cent of whom still refuse to disclose their Jewishness publicly. “They hate the Jewish people, and so does the Iranian government, and that is why they have formed this allegiance. [.......]

Such concerns will loom large in the minds of delegates of the World Jewish Congress, which opens amid tight security today at the Soviet-era Budapest Intercontinental Hotel overlooking the Danube.

Normally the Congress meets in Jerusalem, but this year it has deliberately chosen to convene in the Hungarian capital to highlight what its president, the billionaire philanthropist and cosmetics heir Ronald Lauder, describes as a “dramatic” rise in anti-Semitism in Hungary.

Much of the blame for that is attributed to the Jobbik party, which was founded just ten years ago yet now represents the third-largest faction in politics, with 47 of 386 parliamentary seats.

Also in Mr Lauder’s sights, though, is the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orban, whose ruling centre-right Fidesz Party competes for many of the votes that Jobbik now vies for, and who has been criticised for not taking a firm enough stance against anti-Semitism.

[.........]

The Congress meeting adds to a growing sense of political isolation in Hungary, where earlier this year, the European Union said that Mr Orban’s party was placing too many curbs on the judiciary and media, measures it said could ultimately disqualify the country from EU membership.

While Mr Orban insists the measures have been necessary to end decades of corruption and inefficient government under his predecessors, the fear is that such measures are making it all the easier for groups like Jobbik to gain a foothold. A ban on the Jobbik party holding a counter-demonstration at the World Jewish Congress’s presence in town has only added to their sense of grievance.

Roughly translated as “the Movement for a Better Hungary”, Jobbik’s success has far outstripped similar movements in neighbouring former Communist states. Its appeal in towns like Tiszavasvári has been based partly on confronting problems associated with the country’s half-million strong Roma community, whom many Hungarians see as crime-prone and welfare-dependent.

But as the global banking crisis has hit Hungary hard, leaving more than 1 in 10 jobless, Jobbik has also revived a folk devil at the opposite end of social spectrum – the wealthy, all-controlling Jews, who were traditionally influential in the finance world.

Barely a month now passes in Hungary without a fresh furore over some anti-Semitic incident. Jewish community leaders have been attacked in the street and Jewish cemeteries desecrated. Far-Right biker gangs have also held ugly counter demonstrations to anti-Semitism rallies, entitled “Step on the Gas” days. Mr Gyongyosi, the Jobbik MP, was castigated recently for saying that a “security” register should be created of Hungarian MPs and civil servants who were of “Jewish origin”.

The Hungarian national football association, meanwhile, was recently fined after fans shouted anti-Semitic slogans during a recent World Cup qualifier. And only last week, the leader of the Raoul Wallenberg Association, a charity named after a businessman who rescued many Jews from Nazi-occupied Hungary, was beaten up after telling skinhead thugs to stop chanting “Seig Heil” at a soccer match.

[.........]

True, while verbal abuse has apparently increased, incidents of actual violence are still relatively rare in Hungary: Mr Feldmajer recollects only around 50 physical attacks in 20 years. And it is fair to say that the bootboy image by no means fits all of Jobbik’s supporters, many of whom are respectable working people whose motivations sound little different to the average UKIP supporter. The talk is of frustration with politically correct attitudes to crime and immigration, of children no longer being taught Hungarian history in schools properly, and of a loss of faith in mainstream political parties, whose economic record since communism’s collapse is patchy at best.

Typical is Sipos Ibolya, 55, a cheerful schoolteacher who is Jobbik’s deputy mayoress in Tiszavasvári. The twinning arrangement with Iran, she insists, is not borne of anti-semitism, but simple national self-interest.

“Economically, the Israelis do have too much power in Hungary,” she said.

[.........]

There was a similarly mixed picture at a Jobbik May Day fair last week, which combined elements of Glastonbury festival with a historical re-enactment society. In front of an open-air stage, burly men tattooed with skulls, crossbones and the odd swastika sat listening to bands play right-wing folk music, whose choruses of “we are all one blood” had them singing along. The sideshows, meanwhile, were devoted to displays of swordsmanship, archery and whipcracking, skill practised by the ancient Hungarian tribes whom many Jobbik supporters see as the country’s true forefathers.

But what was billed as a day of harmless, Far-Right family fun also had its darker side. At least one book stall had Hitler’s Mein Kampf on sale, and when it caught the attention of the Sunday Telegraph’s photographer, a youth was overheard was overheard saying “What are these Jews doing here?” What alarms Hungarian liberals, though, is the way that under Mr Orban’s government, such events have become part of the political mainstream. Songs by Far Right bands now do well in the charts, with one group, Carpatia, even receiving an official award, and last year, Hungary’s state-funded New Theatre planned to stage a play about a group of powerful Jews who plot the country’s downfall. Although it was eventually pulled after an outcry from anti-racism activists, it is hard to imagine such a production getting anywhere near a theatre in many other European countries.

Nonetheless, after the trauma of the Holocaust, most of Hungary’s remaining Jews have an all too well-developed sense of perspective about Jobbik. In the old Jewish quarter of Budapest, a maze of cobbled streets, synagogues and smart restaurants, few are planning to take to the streets to mount their counter-Jobbik protests. For one thing, Jews here have learned the hard way to keep a low-profile, and for another, the feeling is that while anti-Semitism comes and goes, it never disappears entirely.

[.......]

Read the rest -  Inside the far-Right stronghold where Hungarian Jews fear for the future

 

 

4 May 1970 – Remember Kent State

by Bunk X ( 85 Comments › )
Filed under History, OOT, Politics at May 4th, 2013 - 11:00 pm

4_MAY_1970_KSU

Remember Always
Who Set It Up and Who Paid The Price

It began when left-wing activists from off-campus arrived by bus on Friday May 1 1970 to host a May Day protest rally. Kent State, a small university in northeast Ohio, had been chosen.

On the surface, the shootings were the result of student protests and irrational military action by the Ohio National Guard. The events that led up to the atrocity are rarely discussed, and those outsiders who deliberately orchestrated it were never prosecuted.

Oh, and by the way, Neil Young can go fuck himself, because it’s time for
The Overnight Open Thread.

Tony Clifton: The Man. The Legend.

by Bunk X ( 30 Comments › )
Filed under Entertainment, History, Humor, OOT, Satire at April 28th, 2013 - 11:00 pm

Tony Clifton Las Vegas

One thing is for sure. Tony Clifton is larger than life, and his imposing image on the Las Vegas Strip deserves to be spilled into the right hand margin. If you don’t like him, you can leave this blog right now. He’s that big.

The late Andy Kaufman knew Tony Clifton personally. For those who only remember Kaufman as Latka Gravas from the TV series “Taxi,” you’re missing out, as Kaufman was an awesome, if eccentric, comedian. Prior to his stints on SNL, Kaufman was a stand up comic whose specialty was long set ups that often had no punch line, yet occasionally provided a responsive audience transportation to a local venue for milk and cookies. He was also a talented impersonator.

Kaufman impersonated Elvis, Tito Puente and Jerry Lawler, but his epitome [embodiment, exemplification, quintessence, essence, perfect example, exemplar, representative, type, typification, personification, incarnation, archetype, model, prototype, pattern, ultimate, last word; see also model] was Tony Clifton, and it was spot on.

I’ve never seen a better impersonation of Tony Clifton, the greatest lounge singer/entertainer/comedian ever. So welcome to  Rafael’s Silver Cloud Lounge, order a tropical beverage (the tiny umbrella is free) and tip the waitress while we introduce the next act: The Overnight Open Thread.

Tiger Attack!

by Speranza ( 129 Comments › )
Filed under Germany, History, Weapons, World War II at April 25th, 2013 - 7:00 pm

 

Pz.Kpfw. Tiiger Ausf.E
The Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf.E

The most feared tank of World War II and probably the one tank that actually put fear into the hearts of its opponents, the German Panzer VI aka  the ” Tiger” tank was a powerful weapon of war.  The genesis of the 56-ton Tiger tank was the German army’s experiences in the Soviet Union in 1941 with the superior KV-1 and T-34 tanks that the Red Army fielded, which came as a shock to the armored and infantry formations of the German Army.  Hitler ordered the development of tanks to counter them and two designs were accepted. The Panzer V aka the “Panther” was a 45-ton  medium tank designed to take on the Soviet T-34 medium and the Panzer VI “Tiger” was built to take on the KV-1 heavy tanks.  The Tiger had a powerful .88 millimeter gun as well as thick almost impenetrable armor. The problem with the Tiger was that it took 300,000 man hours to build each tank, the tanks parts were not interchangeable with the other German tanks, the Tiger used a lot of fuel, and they had a lot of “teething” problems. The Germans had a tendency to over engineer their tanks which was not conducive to mass production or to quick repairs.  These factors made it impossible to build the Tiger in the massive numbers that the Nazis needed on the Eastern Front, and only 1,347 were ever built.  Nevertheless the Tiger in combat pretty much ruled the battlefield.  Most of the Tigers were sent to the elite Waffen S.S. armored divisions and in the hands of tank aces such as the legendary Michael Wittmann they racked up huge numbers of Soviet tanks.  On the Western Front in Normandy it was painfully obvious that despite the information being fed to our soldiers, the M-4 Sherman with its thin armor and  its .76 millimeter gun was an inferior weapon and had little chance one on one against the Tiger.  The fault was with the Army ordinance corps which felt that tanks were not needed to destroy other tanks (tanks should be used for exploitation) and that anti tank guns could do the job of killing enemy tanks. However the Sherman could be produced in mass and as V.I. Lenin allegedly once said “quantity has a quality of its own”.  Hitler, being Hitler and obsessed by “super weapons” that he thought could change the course of the war ordered an even bigger tank – a 70 ton monster – called the  “King Tiger” or Tiger II which played a  prominent role in the Battle of the Bulge. However the Germans built only 492  of these monsters. In  hindsight, Germany would have been better off concentrating on the mass production of the late model versions of the Panzer IV which was an excellent tank and could be produced in far greater numbers.

 

 

 

Cassettes, Pencils and Holes

by Bunk X ( 159 Comments › )
Filed under History, Humor, Media, Music, OOT, Open thread, Technology at April 24th, 2013 - 11:30 pm

cassettes

A common question on “How Old Are You Really” online quizzes asks for the relationship between a No. 2 pencil and an audio tape cassette. The answer? It’s in the hole, and this is the lead in to Side A on The Overnight Open Thread.