► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘Economy’ Category

The Obama Boom leads to a loss of 54,000 Jobs

by Rodan ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Misery Index, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis at September 3rd, 2010 - 11:30 am

It’s early September andthe Friday before Labor Day weekend, thus officially ending Joe Biden’s Recovery Summer. The results of this much hyped turnaround shows that It should have been called Wreckovery Summer due to the damage Obama’s Progressive policies have done. The much hyped and heralded Obama Boom has proved to be a mirage and a lie invented by the media. As a result, the American people have turned against the Progressive establishment and are set to deliver a massive blow on November 2nd.

WASHINGTON — Job losses continued to mount in the U.S. economy last month, though at a more modest pace than expected, putting further pressure on policy makers to take action to spur growth and employment.

Nonfarm payrolls fell by 54,000 last month, matching the level of revised losses recorded the previous month, the U.S. Labor Department said Friday. The revision in July layoffs to 54,000 followed an original estimate of a 131,000 drop in payrolls.

The U.S. economy has shed jobs for three straight months, though the losses in August were about half the 110,000 predicted by economists in a Dow Jones Newswires survey.

The unemployment rate, calculated using a separate household survey, edged up to 9.6%, as expected, after holding at 9.5% for previous two months.

The report is likely to cause renewed debate during the long Labor Day weekend over what new steps the Federal Reserve and Congress should consider to jump-start the job market.

Read the rest: U.S. Economy Lost 54,000 Jobs in August; Unemployment Rate Rises to 9.6%

Americans are suffering from wage stagnation and dim job prospects, yet the Progressive Propaganda media keeps lying. Here is an article claiming that the jobs are numbers are actually good!

“These are very nice numbers for the labor market,” said Kathy Lien, a director of currency research at GFT in New York. “It means for the time being, some of the fears of weakness in the U.S. economy may be misplaced as the data shows the labor market is not as bad as feared.”

[....]

The smaller-than-expected job losses last month lessened fears the economy risked sliding back into recession and eased pressure on the Fed to launch a fresh round of bond buying to keep borrowing costs low.

Can you imagine the media saying this if a Republican was President? When Bush was President and the economy was adding 150,000-200,000 jobs a month, they claimed that was stagnant. Meanwhile jobs losses or anemic private hiring is called a boom! The American people are not being fooled and it will be the Tranzi Totalitarian Progressive Democratic Party who will have to answer to the people. Obama’s policies have failed and no amount of spin can hide this fact.

This was not recovery summer and there is no Obama Boom.

Update: Obama’s Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis claims the Economy is good and that jobs are out there!

The big question: Are things getting better? To answer that, we need to look back more than a year ago, when the economy was losing a staggering 800,000 jobs a month. Our actions, most notably the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, stopped those losses.

The Recovery Act saved millions of American jobs — keeping health care providers in hospitals, teachers in classrooms, and police and firefighters on the beat. But the benefits weren’t just in the public sector. During the past eight months, the economy has averaged 95,000 new private sector jobs.

[...]

There are jobs out there. And, this Labor Day — and every day — I’m going to continue helping people find them and employers fill them. If you’re ready to embrace a 21st century career, I want you to know your Department of Labor is here to help you. And, if you’re an employer looking to fill positions, we’ve got a list of great candidates for you.

We have always been at war with Eastasia! This is outright 1984 style propaganda that Totalitarian regimes have done. It sounds very reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s declarationsof their economic success. Those were false and this hype over the Obama boom is false.

Update II: The young whom analysts had proclaim as solidly Democratic and would lead to a permanent Leftist majority, has lost faith with Obama. A bad job market has awaken many young people to the economic reality that Progressive policies don’t work.

FORT COLLINS, Colo. — The college vote is up for grabs this year — to an extent that would have seemed unlikely two years ago, when a generation of young people seemed to swoon over Barack Obama

Though many students are liberals on social issues, the economic reality of a weak job market has taken a toll on their loyalties: far fewer 18- to 29-year-olds now identify themselves as Democrats compared with 2008.

“Is the recession, which is hitting young people very hard, doing lasting or permanent damage to what looked like a good Democratic advantage with this age group?” asked Scott Keeter, the director of survey research at the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan group. “The jury is still out.”

[....]

“There’s a vibe,” he said on a recent afternoon, while pumping weights at the gym. “Right now it seems like Republicans just care a lot more than Democrats.”

The Republicans have an opportunity to win over younger voters. Republicans such as Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor can appeal to the youth. The Republicans need to focus on the economy to seal the deal with these voters.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The poll that scares the Dimocrats most

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 128 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, History, Misery Index, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party at September 3rd, 2010 - 8:30 am

With yesterday (9-2-10), being two months until the 2010 mid-term elections, here’s some food for thought-

The poll that scares the Dimocrats most

Posted by Moe Lane
Wednesday, September 1st at 2:30PM EDT

It’s this one, from the never-to-be-sufficiently-hated-by-the-Left Rasmussen: and on its face it’s innocuous enough. It’s the partisan identification poll, and it currently lists Democrats at 35%, Republicans at 33.8%, and Neither at 31.1%. Unsurprising, based on recent events, right? – Also, it’s a poll of adults, so this probably means a Republican advantage among likely voters, as that’s the usual rule of thumb for these things. So, nothing really unusual here, right?

Wrong. If this poll is accurate, it’s a harbinger of DOOM for the Democrats.

I don’t pretend to be a professional pollster, but I’ve been dealing with polls on a regular basis since 2003, so I at least know the basics. And I know that – once you get past the pure technical details about whether or not a poll has gotten a true random sample, or whether there’s deliberate bias in the questions – the two major questions that have to be addressed about an election poll both touch on how well it snapshots the actual electorate.

For example: experience shows that a poll that samples 1,000 adults will have a result that is significantly different than one that samples 1,000 likely voters*. The trick is determining what a ‘likely voter’ is, which is why many pollsters at least try to work with the more quantifiable ‘registered voters:’ it doesn’t give you as good results, but it at least screens out the people who can’t vote. It’s also why pollsters try to find out who is enthusiastic about voting, and who isn’t. But that’s only half of the problem; the other half is determining whether or not the current partisan mix of voters has shifted since the last benchmark. That benchmark is usually an election; it’s a truism that, generally, Republicans vote for Republicans and Democrats vote for Democrats. So pollsters look at reliable exit polls, and they look at election results, and every so often they do new partisan identification polls.

And that’s what makes this such a problematic poll of Rasmussen’s for the Democrats. As the pollster noted, historically speaking:

In August 2004, the Democrats had a 2.6 percentage point advantage. In August 2006, they enjoyed a 5.4 percentage point advantage. In August 2008, the gap was 5.7 percentage points. See the History of Party Trends from January 2004 to the present.

…and if you look at the results for those years, you’ll notice that they trended between August and November in all three years towards the party that ended up ‘winning’ those particular election cycles. Which implies that the breakdown is going to be even worse for the Democrats in November. It might even be close to equal.

Why this matters is that a perennial complaint this election cycle is that pollsters keep using partisan breakdowns that assume no major changes between the fundamental makeup of the 2008 electorate and today’s. Yes, pollsters will address the enthusiasm gap – but there is a difference between a politician being down five points because of one party not being motivated to get out the vote and a politician being down five points because there are less members of that party to draw votes from. If Rasmussen is right – and there are a lot of people out there in this business who have a vested professional interest in getting Rasmussen perceived as being wrong – then the problems for the Democratic party will not be addressed in better appeals to their base; they’ll be addressed by changing the policies that are apparently driving voters into the Republican camp**.

And if they don’t, they will simply not be prepared for the psychic shock of Election Night.

Click here to read the rest.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Obama considering Bloomberg for Treasury Secretary

by Rodan ( 255 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Economy, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis at September 2nd, 2010 - 2:00 pm

The Totalitarian Tranzi Progressive Mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg and President Barack Hussein Obama are both appeasers and supporters of Islamic Colonialism. They are elitists and tjey seek to impose a Neo-Feudal system on America. Mike Bloomberg is a Fascist who supports a nanny state and tells New York City residents how to live. He is anti-gun rights and has sued gun makers as a means to keep Americans disarmed. Now there is talk that the Obama regime will hire him for Treasury Secretary.

Is Mayor Bloomberg being wooed to join the Obama administration?

Asked about last weekend’s four-hour golf game with President Obama on Martha’s Vineyard, Bloomberg told reporters yesterday, “The economy was the main subject, other than discussing golf.”

Now there are whispers that the president went even further and sounded out Bloomberg about whether he would join his foundering economic team as treasury secretary, replacing prime blame-target Timothy Geithner.

“Obama needs Bloomberg more than Bloomberg needs Obama,” a source tells us. “Obama’s looking to do something bold and credible before the election.”

Read the rest: White House flirts with Mayor Bloomberg

It’s bad enough that Barack Hussein Obama is perusing a radical Progressive economic agenda, but with Mike Bloomberg as Treasury Secretary it will be even worse. He is for government controls and raising taxes. He is anti-small business and loves burdensome regulations. This will be a nightmare for America. This is probably a reward for his support of the 9/11 Ground Zero Mosque. Both Obama and Bloomberg are allies of the Islamic Imperialists.

Question for the readers, does Mayor Bloomberg and Chuckie look similar?



To me the Prince and the Mayor have a resemblance.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Where did the “FAIL” Internet meme come from?

by 1389AD ( 251 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Elections 2010, Financial, Humor, Open thread at September 2nd, 2010 - 11:30 am

Train wreck at Montparnasse 1895 - FAIL - click for larger image

What’s new about FAILure?

Failure has been part of the human condition ever since the Fall of Man. Every one of us learns of the ubiquity of failure, almost from birth. Failure generally means that you tried something that didn’t work, with consequences all too often catastrophic. In a larger sense, you can also fail by not bothering to make an adequate effort in the first place.

Failure, actual and impending, of every stripe, is celebrated hilariously on an ever-growing cornucopia of blogs and websites, such as The Darwin Awards, Fark.com, There, I Fixed It, The Smoking Gun, numerous demotivational poster sites, and one of my own favorites, the Lords of Logistics series on Dark Roasted Blend.

During the past decade, the familiar word “failure” has become the Internet meme “FAIL”. The infamous Urban Dictionary defines Fail in various ways, including “The glorious lack of success.” The FAIL meme has propagated in tandem with the seemingly exponential growth of FAILure in the world at large.

I’ve occasionally experimented with the FAIL meme myself, both on deviantART and on 1389 Blog. The following example suddenly became more relevant after John McCain won the 2010 Arizona Republican primary election:

Swirling vortex of Arizona FAIL license plates

The unfortunately leftist online Slate Magazine contends that the growth of the FAIL meme reflects Schadenfreude, defined as pleasure at the misfortunes of others:

Slate: Why is everyone saying “fail” all of a sudden?

the good word
Epic Win: Goodbye, schadenfreude; hello, fail.
By Christopher Beam
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2008, at 11:55 AM ET

…What’s with all the failing lately? Why fail instead of failure? Why FAIL instead of fail? And why, for that matter, does it have to be “epic”?

It’s nearly impossible to pinpoint the first reference, given how common the verb fail is, but online commenters suggest it started with a 1998 Neo Geo arcade game called Blazing Star. (References to the fail meme go as far back as 2003.) Of all the game’s obvious draws—among them fast-paced action, disco music, and anime-style cut scenes—its staying power comes from its wonderfully terrible Japanese-to-English translations. If you beat a level, the screen flashes with the words: “You beat it! Your skill is great!” If you lose, you are mocked: “You fail it! Your skill is not enough! See you next time! Bye bye!”

Normally, this sort of game would vanish into the cultural ether. But in the lulz-obsessed echo chamber of online message boards—lulz being the questionable pleasure of hurting someone’s feelings on the Web—”You fail it” became the shorthand way to gloat about any humiliation, major or minor. “It” could be anything, from getting a joke to executing a basic mental task. For example, if you told me, “Hey, I liked your article in Salon today,” I could say, “You fail it.” Convention dictates that I could also add, in parentheses, “(it being reading the titles of publications).” The phrase was soon shortened to fail—or, thanks to the caps-is-always-funnier school of Web writing, FAIL. People started pasting the word in block letters over photos of shameful screw-ups, and a meme was born.

The fail meme hit the big time this year with the May launch of Failblog, an assiduous chronicler of humiliation and a guide to the taxonomy of fail. The most basic fails—a truck getting sideswiped by an oncoming train, say, or a National Anthem singer falling down on the ice—are usually the most boring, as obvious as a clip from America’s Funniest Home Videos. Another easy laugh is the translation fail, such as the unfortunately named “Universidad de Moron.” This is the same genre of fail that spawned Engrish, an entire site devoted to poor English translations of Asian languages, not to mention the fail meme itself. A notch above those are unintentional-contradiction fails, like “seedless” sunflower seeds or a door with two signs on it: “Welcome” and “Keep Out.” Architectural fails have the added misfortune of being semipermanent, such as the handicapped ramp that leads the disabled to a set of stairs or the second-story door that opens out onto nothing. Even more embarrassing are simple information fails, like the brochure that invites students to “Study Spanish in Mexico” with photos of the Egyptian pyramids. These fails often expose deep ignorance: One woman thinks her sprinkler makes a rainbow because of toxins in the water and air.

The highest form of fail—the epic fail—involves not just catastrophic failure but hubris as well. Not just coming in second in a bike race but doing so because you fell off your bike after prematurely raising your arms in victory. Totaling your pickup not because the brakes failed but because you were trying to ride on the windshield. Not just destroying your fish tank but doing it while trying to film yourself lifting weights.

Why has fail become so popular? It may simply be that people are thrilled to finally have a way to express their schadenfreude out loud. Schadenfreude, after all, is what you feel when someone else executes a fail. But the fail meme also changes our experience of schadenfreude. What was once a quiet pleasure-taking is now a public—and competitive—sport.

It’s no wonder, then, that the fail meme gained wider currency with the advent of the financial crisis. Some observers relished watching wealthier-than-God investment bankers get their comeuppance. It helped that the two events occurred at the same time—Google searches for fail surged in early 2008, around the same time the mortgage crisis started to pick up steam. And the ubiquity of phrases like “failed mortgages” and “bank failures” seemed to echo the popular meme, which may have helped usher the term out of 4chan boards and onto blogs.It’s rare that an Internet fad finds such a suitable mainstream vehicle for its dissemination. It’s as if LOLcats coincided with a global outbreak of some feline adorability virus. The financial crisis also fits neatly into the Internet’s tendency toward overstatement. (Worst. Subprime mortgage crisis. Ever.) Only this time, it’s not an exaggeration….

Read the rest.

Somebody else’s troubles may be our own

As with the gapers block phenomenon, we can never quite look away from failures that are not our own. Whether trivial or spectacular, whether humiliating or oddly heroic, whether well-deserved or the outcome of pure happenstance, failure gets our attention, and well it should.

I don’t think it’s always schadenfreude. Sometimes we laugh out of relief because the troubles belong to somebody else this time around, even though we know it could have happened to us.

Other times, we laugh about failure even when the failure DOES embroil us in its consequences, as with the ongoing political, social, and economic debacles in the US and the EU. (If you need a good laugh right now, check out the Sunday Funnies political cartoon series on Flopping Aces.) When we can share a good laugh, it not only underlines the lessons that we can learn from these failures, but also lightens the burdens that we all must bear as we work our way through.


► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Because We Are Too Stupid

by Macker ( 156 Comments › )
Filed under Cars & Trucks, Climate, Democratic Party, Environmentalism, George W. Bush, Regulation, Transportation at September 1st, 2010 - 6:00 pm

Allow me to inform you that this proposed new vehicle sticker was in response to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which was enacted by a Congress controlled by the Demo☭rats and signed by President George W. Bush. We all know how independent and secure our national energy resources are as a result of this magnanimous act, don’t we.
We’re all on the same page…good.

This pisses me off. It offends me to know that the Government assumes that I can’t make the decision for myself and for my family what kind of vehicle we should be driving, and that all the research I would do before hand, especially with the Internet available, isn’t good enough either.
Y’know, I was at the Ford Dealer yesterday afternoon having them check out my battery, which wasn’t cranking enough cold amps. They ended up replacing it at no charge and suggested some maintenance is coming up for the Official Car (and yes, since we’ve been married, that means there’s also an Official Truck too!). I was sorely tempted to go out onto the lot and ask to test drive either an Escape or Edge. I held off on that for now.
Still, this bullshit is leading me down to actually purchasing an SUV as our next Official Vehicle, just to flip the Government off!

CROSS-POSTED AT: Macker’s World

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Cracks in the Great Wall

by coldwarrior ( 78 Comments › )
Filed under China, Economy, Financial at September 1st, 2010 - 11:30 am

It always seemed to me that China and their amazing growth numbers seemed somewhat questionable. I have always had a sneaking suspicion that the Chinese would run out of steam just like the Japanese did in the late 1980′s. So now there is some evidence that the Chinese ‘miracle’ may come to an end after 30 years of growth:

BEIJING — Three numbers should suffice to give Chinese economic policymakers a sleepless night: 65.4 million, $28.7 billion and $2.45 trillion.

In order, they are the estimate by a government researcher of how many apartments stand vacant in China, many of them bought as speculative investments; the country’s trade surplus in July; and the international reserves the central bank has accumulated by buying dollars to hold down the yuan.

Together, they encapsulate the distortions of an economy that favors investment by suppressing the cost of capital and other inputs at the expense of consumers, whose spending power is held down by low wages and low deposit rates.

Unable to sell at home all that it produces, China exports the rest…

…This template has powered 30 years of headlong growth that is catapulting China past Japan to become the world’s largest economy after the United States.

But it is a formula that Beijing readily agrees is unsustainable: China needs to rely more on household spending, especially as its export prospects are darkening now that the West is tightening its belt to purge excess debt.

Many experts are confident that a pragmatic China will succeed in making the transition in the coming decade to a new growth model anchored by urban-based consumption, technological upgrading and a greater role for market forces.

Please, read the rest, its an excellent article!

Buy buying dollars, the Chinese have managed to hold down the value of their Yuan. By forcing the value of the Yuan down, this makes exports, especially to the US, cheaper and more marketable. In effect, this is the Chinese exporting unemployment. The problem with an imbalance as noted in the article is that as the West and America tighten their belts and consume less, the export market in China can crash, leading to  unemployment and other economic problems. The trick for the Chinese is to increase domestic consumption, which is going to be a problem because of the resistance of the entrenched interests and the desire of the Party to retain control.

This situation is something to keep an eye on. Watch for the term ‘China Trap’ to start making its way around the economic circles.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Greasy Joe the pitchman; and Chris Christie – the anti Obama

by Speranza ( 178 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Elections 2010 at August 31st, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Has there been anything more ridiculous then the sight of Joe Biden on television running around the country on a fools errand, acting like the late Billy Mays the infomercial pitchman,  touting a “Recovery Summer” despite all the evidence that there is no recovery and the American people are not buying into it? If we win in November (and I believe we will) it will be in spite of the Republican party (a party  referred to as “the stupid party”) and because our opponents have made such a palpable muck of things.

by Rich Lowry

Joe Biden was an inspired choice as spokesman for the “summer of recovery.”

If the Obama administration wanted someone with little credibility to lose, who will say anything without a hint of shame or compunction, whose mouth habitually outruns the facts and common sense, it found its man.

Biden is still hawking his recovery summer, even as GDP growth slows to a crawl, and he’ll still tout the marvels of the stimulus even if we dip into negative territory again later this year. He makes the late, great pitchman Billy Mays look restrained and rhetorically scrupulous by comparison.

Biden is joined at the hip to the most disastrous White House shibboleth since President Gerald Ford’s “whip inflation now.”

In a vaguely Soviet act of governmental exhortation, in 1974 Ford wanted local citizens’ groups to “whip inflation now,” or WIN. He offered a shiny “WIN” button to anyone enlisting “as an Inflation Fighter and Energy Saver for the duration.” Six months later, only one local committee had been formed, and even Ford concluded the initiative was “too gimmicky.” Inflation remained unwhipped.

[...]

In a favorite administration statistic, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the stimulus increased the number of people employed by 1.4 million to 3.3 million in the second quarter, a suspiciously wide range redolent of seat-of-the-pants guesswork. All the report proves is that if you adopt a model that assumes that the stimulus created jobs, it created a lot of them. The stimulus excels in this ethereal category of assumed job-creation.

If the stimulus provided any initial boost to the economy, it was a sugar high, its effect neither healthy nor enduring. It’s been a chilly summer of recovery. Macroeconomic Advisers, which estimates growth on a monthly basis, says GDP growth declined 0.4 percent in June. Only 61,000 private-sector jobs were created in June and July. Biden must be banking on a hell of an August.

Read the rest here: Joe’s shameless ‘recovery’ line

Chris Christie has become the anti-Obama by following one of Reagan’s great strengths – appealing to people beyond his base constituency. That is why I feel we need to tone down the red meat social issues and concentrate on those issues which affect the most Americans which is jobs, taxes and each family’s  burden of the national debt.  When President Reagan fired the air traffic controllers in 1981 after they broke the law and were warned of the consequences, he sent a message to the rest of America – “I am president of the United States, not a puppet of any union.”

by Kevin Hassett

With all the crazy talk of President Barack Obama being the antichrist, it’s sort of amusing that the anti-Obama is a guy named Christie.

To understand the political force sweeping our country, one need only search the words “Chris Christie” on YouTube. The New Jersey governor’s town hall appearances have received hundreds of thousands of hits and glowing comments because the man, like Ronald Reagan before him, has an uncanny ear for what troubles Americans.

The truth is, a mensch like Christie could never have emerged in American politics if super-slick Obama had not enraged so many Americans first. If Jimmy Carter created Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama created Chris Christie.

[...]

Small Town

On June 15th, Christie appeared at a town hall meeting in Perth Amboy, New Jersey. The crowd assembled was hardly a stereotypical BMW-driving Republican audience, looking like a group that could represent any small town in America

One senses that these Americans rarely gather all in one place, and that when they do, the gravity of the moment is palpable to them. And then Christie says, “our way of life is being challenged by an economy where we have too much debt, too big a government, too much spending and taxes being too high. We all know it in our hearts…we all understand that the day of reckoning is here.” And while he speaks, the people gather — even Wilda Diaz, the Democratic mayor, seem to nod in agreement.

[....]

Angry Teachers

And attack he does. One of Christie’s most popular YouTube moments is a confrontation with an angry teacher, who upbraids him for not paying her enough. When Christie replies that if she doesn’t like the pay package “then you don’t have to do it,” the crowd cheers like the Giants just scored a touchdown.

[....]

Reagan became on overwhelming political force because of his ability to appeal to audiences beyond his natural constituency, as Christie did at that Perth Amboy gathering. Christie clearly has the same knack, and will become an irresistible political force if New Jersey can recover.

It is an open question whether it will, but if it does, then the Republican Party may have found a real star.

Read the rest here: Christie Channels Reagan to Become Anti-Obama

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Lifestyles of the Rich and Progressive

by Speranza ( 240 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Progressives at August 30th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

I agree with the last paragraph – Obama could survive his less then stellar work ethic if the rest of the nation has jobs.  Jobs will be the key to his winning or losing reelection, not peripheral social con issues. That is why we have to hammer him day after day with the question “Where are the (private sector) jobs?”

by David Pietrusza

By now, the adjectives have become commonplace for Barack Obama and his administration.

Progressive.

Game-Changing.

Wilsonian.

Yes, similarities do exist between Barack Obama and his Democratic predecessor, Woodrow Wilson. Both are frigidly demeanored but messianic academics. With barely two years of government experience in statewide office, each assumed the presidency and presided over fundamental overhauls of the existing American system.
But here’s where one can find another little-noticed but perhaps telling comparison: their work habits.

Barack Obama is already more famous for vacations, golfing, and theater-going than he ought to be. In a period of economic crisis, he is off to Maine and Hawaii and Broadway and Martha’s Vineyard. His wife communes with the King of Spain. In time of war, he ducks a Memorial Day ceremony to vacation in America’s favorite sun-and-fun vacation spot — Chicago. He plays basketball. He works out. He golfs and golfs — and golfs.

The pattern and the perception are set. Aside from Barack Obama’s time before the teleprompter, the American public, now out of work, remains unsure of just when this fellow works.
And that brings us back to Mr. Wilson.

[...]

Yet Wilson survived a Republican resurgence to narrowly gain another term in 1916. The early Wilson years, after all, were years of prosperity. And in comfortable times, it matters not at all whether Ike golfs or LBJ pulls beagles up by their ears. Conversely, when unemployment or inflation stalk the land, it remains of similar low consequence if solemn engineers Herbert Hoover or Jimmy Carter burn the midnight oil to fiddle with the details of a sinking ship of state.

The bottom line: if the American people are at work in 2012, it matters not at all if Barack Obama plays.

Read the rest: Lifestyles of the rich and progressive


► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Nation-Building in Muslim Countries: EPIC FAIL

by 1389AD ( 182 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Financial, George W. Bush, Iraq, Islam, Military, Republican Party, Tranzis at August 30th, 2010 - 8:30 am

US Government Wasted Billions in Rebuilding Iraq
h/t: NoThreat2U

By Kim Gamel, AP

KHAN BANI SAAD, Iraq — A $40 million prison sits in the desert north of Baghdad, empty. A $165 million children’s hospital goes unused in the south. A $100 million waste water treatment system in Fallujah has cost three times more than projected, yet sewage still runs through the streets

As the U.S. draws down in Iraq, it is leaving behind hundreds of abandoned or incomplete projects. More than $5 billion in American taxpayer funds has been wasted — more than 10 percent of the some $50 billion the U.S. has spent on reconstruction in Iraq, according to audits from a U.S. watchdog agency.

That amount is likely an underestimate, based on an analysis of more than 300 reports by auditors with the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction. And it does not take into account security costs, which have run almost 17 percent for some projects.

Read it all.

What a waste!

We need to rebuild America, and we can do it only by restraining our spending, by cutting the deficit, by deregulating, and by lowering taxes.

“Foreign aid” is one place where we need to stop spending money. I do not mean that we should merely “cut” spending, I mean that we should stop entirely. That also means not a penny more for QUANGOs or NGOs such as USAID.

Nation-building = EPIC FAIL

Presidents in both parties like to use the often illusory and temporary benefits that the US government provides for overseas beneficiaries as a PR move and sometimes a backdrop for photo ops. Too bad nobody ever asks the American people whether we want or can afford to spend this money.

The amount of waste, graft, and simple incompetence taking place place on government projects overseas tends to be even higher than that which takes place on the same type of government project at home. One reason is that distance is always and everywhere the enemy of accountability. The other reason is that the US has so often been trying to modernize Islamic countries, which is inherently impossible to do without eliminating Islam. This is one area where I do fault George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice. Due to their backgrounds in the oil industry, and due to their indoctrination in the fraudulent Wilsonian ideology, neither one of them is intellectually, emotionally, or spiritually capable of comprehending the threat that is Islam.

Money sent to Islamic nations is not received with gratitude. It is interpreted either as an attempt at manipulation on the part of the Judaeo-Christian West, or as a form of jizya and a sign of weakness and dhimmitude.

Any US government spending overseas costs us heavily at home. We cannot afford it; more often than not, it is counterproductive; and the sooner we put an end to it, the better.

GWB and the Republican Party have paid the price for these fruitless attempts at ‘nation-building’.

The exchange of comments that appeared on a prior thread on 2.0: The Blogmocracy, regarding this very issue, underline my point:

1389AD wrote:

Speranza wrote:

Rodan wrote:

@ 1389AD:
Bush has a Progressive Pro-Islamic Wilsonian foreign policy. He really believed they would love Democracy.

Islam and democarcy are not compatible.

Islam and anything other than Islam (with the proven historical exception of Nazism) are not compatible.

(Visit this link to read the other comments.)

What to do?

Our politicians must be taught the lesson that ‘nation-building’ is always and everywhere doomed to fail. But that will happen if, and only if, people like ourselves hold their feet to the fire.

If you are an American, I ask that you write, call, or better yet, VISIT the offices of your US Senators and your US Representative. Tell them NO more tax dollars should go to foreign aid or nation-building, and that the money should go instead toward deficit and tax reduction. If you visit their district offices, you will usually be able to talk with a staffer. That’s just fine – the staffers relay constituent concerns to the legislator, and your message will get through.


► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Why do I detest liberals? Watch “I want your money”, and President Reagan’s reply…

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 69 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Health Care, Misery Index, Patriotism, Progressives, Republican Party, Tea Parties, Tranzis at August 26th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

God, I wish President Reagan was still alive. This is why I hate, no…that’s too nice…I absolutely detest liberals….

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Nice Work, If You Can Get It

by Speranza ( 157 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Politics at August 26th, 2010 - 11:30 am

Remember the old days when those who did not go to college went into civil service? The trade off was that while they would not make a lot of money, they would have job security and good benefits. Now governmental work is preferable to private sector work – yet a lot of government workers have a strong sense of entitlement.  Barack and Michelle Obama epitomizes the type of people who could never make it in private industry.

by Carol Peracchio

Recently, Congressman Charlie Rangel went to the floor of the House of Representatives to make a spirited defense against the thirteen ethics charges laid against him. This caught my attention:

Hey, I’m 80 years old. All my life has been from the beginning public service. That’s all I’ve ever done. Been in the Army, been a state legislator, been a federal prosecutor, 40 years here. …

Public service. An interesting choice of words. Merriam-Webster defines public service as being employed by the government. But like so much of our language today, the meaning has evolved. Under the Obamas, public service is now a holy calling, light-years beyond what used to be known as civil service.

Public service now encompasses working for non-profit corporations, the “helping” professions, and work which advances the latest pet causes of the Left. Included are community organizers, officeholders, and any job whose description includes the term “raising awareness” or has the word “advocate” in its title.

Both Obamas have preached the superiority of public service over self-employment or success in the private sector. During the 2008 campaign, at a women’s forum, Michelle Obama instructed her audience:

We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do[.] … Don’t go into corporate America. You know, become teachers. Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we’re encouraging our young people to do that. But if you make that choice, as we did, to move out of the money-making industry into the helping industry, then your salaries respond. [Emphasis added.]

President Obama added qualifiers on what makes a job public service-worthy. In a commencement speech at Arizona State University in 2009, the president lectured the graduates:

With a degree from this university, you have everything you need to get started. Did you study business? Why not help our struggling non-profits find better, more effective ways to serve folks in need. Nursing? Understaffed clinics and hospitals across this country are desperate for your help. Education? Teach in a high-need school; give a chance to kids we can’t afford to give up on – prepare them to compete for any job anywhere in the world. Engineering? Help us lead a green revolution, developing new sources of clean energy that will power our economy and preserve our planet.

Therefore, working in business can be public service if one is helping “struggling non-profits,” and engineering is public service when it is part of a “green revolution.” At least we know that the Obamas are admonishing us from experience. After all, as Michelle Obama told us, they “left corporate America.” But did Michelle’s salary respond?

It certainly did. In 1991, Michelle Obama left the world of corporate law to serve the public in Chicago Mayor Daley’s office. She then served the public at the Chicago Department of Planning and Development and by founding the Chicago chapter of Public Allies, a non-profit organization. In 1996, Mrs. Obama continued her public service at the University of Chicago and the University of Chicago Hospitals. By 2005, Mrs. Obama’s salary had “responded” to her public service work to the tune of $317,000.

Nice work if you can get it.

[...]

Read the rest here: Public service: Nice Work If You Can Get It

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Intel CEO Blasts Admin

by snork ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Regulation, Technology at August 25th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

Things are getting bad in Silicon Valley when you start reading this kind of scathing criticism of the way the administration, congress, and the  power structure in Sacramento are driving investment out of the US.

The U.S. legal environment has become so hostile to business, [Intel CEO] Otellini said, that there is likely to be “an inevitable erosion and shift of wealth, much like we’re seeing today in Europe–this is the bitter truth.”

Not long ago, Otellini said, “our research centers were without peer. No country was more attractive for start-up capital… We seemed a generation ahead of the rest of the world in information technology. That simply is no longer the case.”

Cnet tries to deflect some of the criticism with this:

The phenomenon of technology executives advancing dismal predictions and offering pointed critiques of Washington politicking isn’t new, of course.

For instance: In 2005, midway through the Bush administration, Microsoft’s Bill Gates told a Washington audience that curbs on immigration and guest workers would provide a boost to research institutions in China and India. A year earlier, then-Intel CEO Craig Barrett warned that the U.S. must dramatically improve its education system.

However, the comparison is apples and oranges. Gates’ criticism had to do with immigration policy, education, and his ability to attract and keep well-qualified talent. Otellini is talking about something different, and much broader:

Otellini singled out the political state of affairs in Democrat-dominated Washington, saying: “I think this group does not understand what it takes to create jobs. And I think they’re flummoxed by their experiment in Keynesian economics not working.”

Since an unusually sharp downturn accelerated in late 2008, the Obama administration and its allies in the U.S. Congress have enacted trillions in deficit spending they say will create an economic stimulus — but have not extended the Bush tax cuts and have pushed to levy extensive new health care and carbon regulations on businesses.

He likens this to a ‘do’ loop:

As a result, he said, “every business in America has a list of more variables than I’ve ever seen in my career.” If variables like capital gains taxes and the R&D tax credit are resolved correctly, jobs will stay here, but if politicians make decisions “the wrong way, people will not invest in the United States. They’ll invest elsewhere.”

Take factories. “I can tell you definitively that it costs $1 billion more per factory for me to build, equip, and operate a semiconductor manufacturing facility in the United States,” Otellini said.

The rub: Ninety percent of that additional cost of a $4 billion factory is not labor but the cost to comply with taxes and regulations that other nations don’t impose. (Cypress Semiconductor CEO T.J. Rodgers elaborated on this in an interview with CNET, saying the problem is not higher U.S. wages but anti-business laws: “The killer factor in California for a manufacturer to create, say, a thousand blue-collar jobs is a hostile government that doesn’t want you there and demonstrates it in thousands of ways.”)

“If our tax rate approached that of the rest of the world, corporations would have an incentive to invest here,” Otellini said. But instead, it’s the second highest in the industrialized world, making the United States a less attractive place to invest–and create jobs–than places in Europe and Asia that are “clamoring” for Intel’s business.

Note something critical here: there’s nothing there unique to the silicon business, or to tech in general. The same economic buggery that the donkeys are ruining the tech sector with is also death for all other manufacturing, and even service jobs.

The comments from Intel’s chief executive echoed statements made a day earlier by Carly Fiorina, the former HP CEO turned Republican Senate candidate.

America’s skilled-worker visa system is so badly broken and anti-immigration that “we have to start from scratch,” Fiorina said, adding that too many government policies push jobs overseas instead of making U.S. companies competitive against international rivals.

Our corporate tax rates are the second highest in the world,” and Congress has repeatedly failed to make an R&D tax credit permanent, Fiorina told the Aspen audience. It’s time to start “acknowledging the reality that companies go where they’re welcome,” she said. (The effective U.S. corporate income tax is 35 percent [essentially tied for first place with Japan of "lost decade" fame -ed], far over the industrialized-nation average of 18.2 percent.)

We’re doomed.

____________

Update:

Even some donkeys seem to be getting it.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Thanks to Obama and the libs, the economy is so bad that…

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 358 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Humor, Misery Index, Open thread, Politics, Progressives at August 24th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

I got a pre-declined credit card offer in the mail.

African television stations are now showing ‘Sponsor an American Child’ commercials.

I ordered a burger at Wendy’s and the kid behind the counter asked, “Can you afford fries with that?”.

My ATM gave me an IOU.

I saw a Mormon polygamist with only one wife.

I bought a toaster oven and got a bank as a free gift.

If the bank returns your check marked “Insufficient Funds,” you call them and ask if they meant you or them.

Hot Wheels and Matchbox stocks are trading higher than GM and Chrysler.

McDonald’s is selling a 1/4 ouncer with cheese.

Angelina Jolie adopted a child from America.

My cousin had an exorcism but when she couldn’t afford to pay for it, they re-possessed her.

A truckload of Americans was caught sneaking into Mexico.

Motel Six won’t leave the light on for you anymore.

A picture is now only worth 100 words.

They renamed Wall Street “Wal-Mart” Street.

When Bill and Hillary travel together, they now have to share a room.

The Treasure Island casino in Las Vegas is now managed by Somali pirates.

I was so depressed last night thinking about the economy, wars, jobs, my savings, Social Security, retirement funds, etc., I called the Suicide Hotline. I got a call center in Pakistan, and when I told them I was suicidal, they got all excited, and asked if I could drive a truck or knew how to fly a plane.

President Obungler now has to play miniature golf

And finally…

The libs in Congress say they are looking into this Bernard Madoff scandal. Oh Great!!! The guy who made $50 billion disappear is being investigated by the same people who made $1.5 trillion disappear.

This is also an open thread to discuss anything your little ol’ heart desires!

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Another Viral Email

by snork ( 145 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Open thread, Sports at August 23rd, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Some have said that the stimulus hasn’t saved any jobs, but here is a case where at least one job was saved.

Take for instance Oregon State University Athletic Director
Bob DeCarolis.


Now Mr. DeCarolis was considering firing their
Basketball Coach…….
Craig Robinson


after an 8 -11 start (2-5) in the Pac 10 conference).
When word reached Washington ,
Undersecretary of Education
Martha Kanter


was dispatched to Corvallis with $17 million
in stimulus money for the university.
Thankfully, Craig Robinson’s job is
safe for another year


Now comes the interesting part of our story….
For those of you unfamiliar with
Coach Robinson,


he just so happens to be the brother in law
of none other than our country’s
beloved President,


NOW YOU’RE CATCHING ON……
that’s right he is the brother of
Michelle Obama!


But hey, can’t we all come to the conclusion
that Coach Robinson’s job security
was all just a coincidence?
I’m sure of it!
Aren’t You?
Thank Goodness For The Stimulus!!!

Damn tootin. Because any other conclusion would be… c’mon now class…

RACIST!!!!!

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Giving it Away

by snork ( 222 Comments › )
Filed under Economy at August 23rd, 2010 - 2:00 pm

A blog post at The TaxProf (original WSJ piece behind paywall) brings up one of those startlingly counterintuitive issues: does money given away to charity serve society in general and the poor of society in particular better than the same money invested for profit?

Bill Gates and Warren Buffett announced this month that 40 of America’s richest people have agreed to sign a “Giving Pledge” to donate at least half of their wealth to charity. With a collective net worth said to total $230 billion, that promise translates to at least $115 billion.

It’s an impressive number. Yet some—including Messrs. Gates and Buffett—say it isn’t enough. Perhaps it’s actually too much: the wealthy may help humanity more as businessmen and women than as philanthropists.

When I read this, I flashed back to my thread on the Professional Left:

Obama’s entire career has been about organizing, sustaining, and advancing the professional left and their operations. One such undertaking involved the processing of $50 million given by the conservative Annenberg Foundation to reform Chicago public schools from 1995 to 2001. In this Obama was assisted by Bill Ayers, the former Marxist terrorist turned professor, who develops and teaches the methodology of advancing leftist dogmas in the classroom.

One case study to be sure, but how much charitable money actually goes to do good, as opposed to lining the pockets of malevolent activists? I don’t think there’s much doubt that the Annenberg money not only didn’t benefit any poor, it actually hurt. The same money invested in a plant or warehouse in Chicago would have clearly done more good.

Back to the BlogProf:

I do not mean to belittle philanthropy. I represent a foundation and believe it can accomplish a great deal of good if it achieves its donor’s objective, which is to free individuals to pursue their ambitions without the burden of intrusive government. My point is simply that there is nothing inherently better or nobler about using one’s resources for charitable purposes than for any number of other ones. If anything, the marketplace does a better job of channeling resources toward where they are most valued, and of punishing failure. Companies shut down all the time. How many philanthropies close because of poor performance?

An amazing bit of candor from someone in the “biz”, but true. We’ve been cutting any operation under the heading of “non-profit” too much slack while at the same time presuming all for-profit organizations guilty without a trial. There’s no logical reason to believe this.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon