► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

Tips for Buying Your First Handgun

by huckfunn ( 22 Comments › )
Filed under Education, Open thread, Special Report, Weapons at March 24th, 2013 - 10:38 am

Yay! A gun thread that actually starts off as a gun thread. Here are some commonsense tips for anyone who is unfamiliar with firearms but is contemplating buying a handgun. The original title of the article is “Tips for Women Buying Their First Handgun”, but the tips Ms. Foxwell offers are not really gender specific and would apply equally to men and women.

Price

You get what you pay for and you also pay for what you get.

There are a few misnomers out there but largely a solid, reliable pistol will cost in- between $400-$600 and slightly less for a revolver. You may have to do a bit of shopping but there is no reason to stray outside of your budget.

A week after I decided to purchase a handgun, I bought a pistol for $250 and I thought it was an amazing deal. After going to the range to shoot my new gun I decided I hated handguns period. It took a year to find out I simply did not own the right handgun for me.

Simplicity =Reliability

The simpler it is to break down and clean your firearm the more often you will do it, and that makes for a reliable firearm.

I fell in love with a gun when I saw my first Kimber. However it was complex to disassemble and that meant it would be a very dirty gun if it were mine. Maintenance is much of what makes the difference in reliability. Be honest with yourself; if it makes you nuts to put it back together how often will you take it apart? Buy something simple to use and maintain.

Read the entire article here.  Hat tip The Daily Caller

Chicken Little Views the World or Politics of Science

by Mars ( 173 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Blogmocracy, Climate, Communism, Economy, Education, Environmentalism, Free Speech, Guest Post, Liberal Fascism, Marxism, Medicine, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Science, Socialism at March 22nd, 2013 - 3:00 pm

I’ve had some weird thoughts lately and have been wondering what is our next big crisis.  Of course that line of thought lead me to thinking about all of the past crises that get thrown at us every day.  Lead paint, bird flu, BPA, cell phone cancer, wireless signals scrambling brains, zombie apocalypse, etc.  We are inundated with this kind of crap almost every second of every day.  The worst part about all of these is when they inevitably trot out the scientists.  The parade of scientists proclaiming each and every crisis to be the next great world destroying tragedy is a never ending media circus.  We all know the biggest of these media/scientific circuses, AGW.  What we don’t often think about in the haze and blur of all this media static constantly buzzing through our brains is this simple matter.  There is a reason this is being done.  Who benefits from false science?  The media benefits by getting the newest and biggest story.  The liberal politicians benefit because they get to implement more freedom destroying laws and regulations helping usher in their grand socialist utopia.  The scientists are the ones that many don’t understand.  How do they benefit?  Well, science is all about getting published.  Once you’re published you get the bigger grants, the bigger college seats, the more recognition.  So, next time you hear that the science is in and there is a consensus, immediately become suspicious.  If they say that all the scientists agree, then you know damn well there is an agenda.  Science is not about agreement, it is about investigating over and over again until you finally either prove something definitively or you find the flaws.  And if it gets proven definitively, it will still be reexamined over and over for anything that might have been missed.

 

What got me thinking along these lines was the BPA scare of the last few years.  It just seemed a little odd that something we have had for years was suddenly and without warning a destructive evil.  From there of course I began to wonder about the lead paint thing.  It seemed odd to me that all the mental illnesses that they are trying to blame on lead paint are more evident now after the bans than they were when lead paint was in everything.  From what I’ve seen it’s mainly a case of more reporting on the mental problems than anything else, so at the worst things have remained the same.  So if that data was flawed and or falsified what else was?  Well, it turns out even though I can’t find any detailed information on the whole lead paint deal, there is a contrary opinion in the scientific community on BPA.

 

 

Anti BPA Crusade Discrediting Science And Environmental Health, Says Leading, Independent Expert

Trevor Butterworth, Contributor

Reason, Risk, and Regulation

Professor Richard Sharpe is a leading expert on male reproductive health, directing a research team at the UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Reproductive Health at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. The MRC, which is celebrating its centenary this year, is one of the world’s oldest medical research institutes, publicly funded and wholly independent of government. Among the discoveries by scientists working under its aegis are penicillin and the structure of DNA. Sharpe’s focus on reproductive problems has put him at the forefront of research into phthalates, a family of chemicals that make plastic flexible, and, more generally, endocrinology, endocrine disruption (how trace exposures to environmental chemicals may adversely effect hormonal function), and the impact of lifestyle effects (such as diet) and other health issues (such as obesity).

Given Sharpe’s key work on chemical risk, and the fact that he is not funded by industry, and that he does not dismiss concerns about the risks of environmental chemicals (“I am not a die-hard ‘chemicals are safe’ man by any means,” he wrote in the UK’s Independent newspaper), it came as a shock to many environmentalists when he denounced the crusade to highlight the risks of another chemical, bisphenol A (BPA), as violating the fundamental principles of scientific inquiry.

The broadside came in a 2009 article for Toxicological Sciences. The controversy over BPA lay, he argued, not in the in chemical posing a threat, but in the refusal of a small group of scientists to accept that their basic research, consisting of small studies with questionable methodologies and limited statistical power, could not be replicated by much larger studies using larger sample sizes and more sophisticated and careful methods. This small group (mostly funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and centered around the University of Missouri biologist Frederick vom Saal) had insisted that an industry-funded conspiracy was the reason the larger studies couldn’t be trusted; and yet, as Sharpe pointed out, very careful research by the Environmental Protection Agency and similar, publicly funded, bodies in Europe and Japan couldn’t replicate their findings either. Scientific method obligated them to either design better studies or concede their original findings were wrong. They did neither. As Sharpe wrote:

If an earlier result cannot be reproduced in a huge study conducted in a scientifically rigorous manner, as exemplified by Ryan et al. (2009), then the original result fails one of the golden rules that govern scientific research. When this happens repeatedly, as is the case with bisphenol A, then there can be no logical, scientifically based reason for continuing to espouse that the original results are the only ones that are correct, rather the converse.

Professor Sharpe was a speaker at a symposium on BPA at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston, where this interview took place (with later follow up by email).

So what has changed in the past three years since publication of your paper in Toxicological Sciences?

Sharpe: I think things have not moved on quite the way that I would have liked them to. There’s still the camp who is ignoring a lot of the evidence, and which remains the most vociferous. One of the issues is that in science nothing is ever absolutely black or white; but if you ignore a lot of the evidence – the bits that don’t fit – you can make something black and white. And I think’s that essentially what’s been happening with bisphenol A. There’s a certain group of people who are convinced that it’s responsible for all manner of ills and when evidence is published that does not fit with that, they find ways of dismissing it. If that doesn’t work, they then try to discredit the people who did it, which is not the way to go about things. I think that is just completely unacceptable.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/trevorbutterworth/2013/02/26/anti-bpa-crusade-discrediting-science-and-environmental-health-says-leading-independent-expert

 

Please read the rest of the article.  It is amazing.  So many of the things that happened to people who did not agree with the BPA findings are identical to the things that happen to any scientist who comes out against AGW.

 

Why is this happening?  Don’t let it fool you, this is about control.  The progressive marxists worldwide are creating crisis after crisis to whittle away at freedom to help promote increased taxation and attack capitalism.  Every thing they come up with helps to create a situation that winds up costing industry massive amounts of money to correct.  This comes with the addition of more regulations that drive costs up even more.    Little by little they nip away at the basis of capitalism and increase government influence into business.  So, every time you hear more of this crap, then be sure to take a second look and follow up with research.  You may find out that things are not what they seem.

 

Dr. Benjamin Carson’s Speech at the National Prayer Breakfast. MUST SEE!

by huckfunn ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Education, Free Speech, Health Care, Medicine, Patriotism, Special Report at February 9th, 2013 - 10:09 am

For those of you who haven’t seen this video, please take a few minutes to at least skim through it. Dr. Carson is the Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins. He made history in 1987 when he successfully separated conjoined twins who were joined at the back of their heads. At any rate, Dr. Carson was selected to deliver the keynote speech at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast. In attendance was none other than Barak Hussein Obama, sitting about 6 feet away and to the right of Dr. Carson. Dr. Carson’s speech goes on for about 27 minutes in which he totally demolishes Obamacare specifically and socialism generally. Dr. Carson’s speech is emotionally and spiritually uplifting with many personal anecdotes and interesting stories about life, all delivered without malice and with the demeanor of a Sunday school teacher. However, one of the more delightful things about this speech is watching Obama do a slow burn throughout the entire speech.

Hat tip – Waldensianspirit

Seven Fascinating Facts About Dr. Benjamin Carson via The Blaze

Age of Narcissism Evil and Insanity Edition

by Mars ( 114 Comments › )
Filed under Corruption, Crime, Democratic Party, Education, Entertainment, Fascism, Free Speech, government, Guest Post, Liberal Fascism, Patriotism, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Second Amendment, Weapons at January 26th, 2013 - 12:00 pm

America: The Kardashian Years

ByClarice Feldman

Life in the Time of Low Information Voters

I used to love American popular culture. I found it rich, diverse and endlessly amusing. These days, I rarely go to the movies or plays and cannot bear to watch television. Even the radio with its repetitive, uninformative news snippets annoys. Our popular culture has moved from family favorites like Your Show of Shows, The Wonder Years, and I Love Lucy to the minute by minute coverage of celebrities not known for their wit, charm, or beauty, They are known for nothing other than the willingness to put their every part of bodies on narcissistic display and to promote the latest chichi leftwing cause.

Alicia Colon examines the phenomenon of the low information voters such a dross culture produces

Right now they are clueless. Consequently they have allowed the Democrats to hijack and distort the GOP’s positions on virtually every issue. Republicans, therefore, don’t care about the middle class and only want to reduce the taxes of the rich. They are also racists who want to keep minorities down. These distortions are repeated often by anchors on MSNBC and the alphabet networks. CNN is always on in the social service offices and in airports and the formerly legitimate cable station is so far on the decline that it feels comfortable allowing disgusting antics by amoral hosts on its New Year’s Eve broadcast.

But it is folly to assume that all the low-info voters are poorly educated or on the dole. College students and graduates of liberal academia have been completely indoctrinated in leftist ideology and loathe all things conservative. Their bibles include the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times which routinely carry and affirm the Democrat lies.

Hollywood trots out alarming films on climate change, environmental doom and the racist doings of evil white men. Stars like Matt Damon, Leonardo DiCaprio, Samuel Jackson, Jamie Foxx, and Morgan Freeman use their talents to shill for the administration and the Democrats. The hypocrites that filmed that anti-gun ad calling for action following the Sandy Hook school massacre blithely ignore their participation in films glamorizing a violent gun culture. Democrats called for the ban on all assault weapons with some leftist reporter asking if we really needed such a weapon to kill an animal.

At one point even Saturday Night Live took note of the clueless citizens among us. Its target was the undecided voter, but a broader sweep was called for. How else to explain that voters elected a man with no executive experience in 2008 (and virtually no other relevant experience of any sort) and then re-elected him after he demonstrated beyond peradventure of doubt why his election to office was a stupid idea in the first place.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/america_the_kardashian_years.html#ixzz2IwT9ikJN
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

 

Second Excerpt

Nominations to Die From: “The Muzzle is Off”

Jewish voters have been notoriously slow to notice that their former friends on the left side of the aisle have abandoned Israel. But — just perhaps — the nominations of Chuck Hagel, John Brennan, and John Kerry, the troika of nominees for Secretaries of State and Defense and head of the CIA most hostile to Israel in U.S. history, might get them to turn off Jon Stewart, pitch their copies of the New York Times, and start paying attention to real news.

Barry Rubin explains Obama’s “muzzle is off”:

–Their ideas and views are horrible. This is especially so on Middle Eastern issues but how good are they on anything else? True, they are all hostile to Israel but this isn’t the first time people who think that way held high office. Far worse is that they are pro-Islamist as well as being dim-witted about U.S. interests in a way no foreign policy team has been in the century since America walked onto the world stage.

Brennan is no less than the father of the pro-Islamist policy. [snip]

–They are all stupid people. Some friends said I shouldn’t write this because it is a subjective judgment and sounds mean-spirited. But honest, it’s true. [snip]Smart people can make bad judgments; regular people with common sense often make bad judgments less often. But stupid, arrogant people with terrible ideas are a disaster.
[snip]

Kerry, of course, was the most energetic backer of sponsoring Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad before the revolt began. Now he will be the most energetic backer of putting the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Syria. Here is a man who once generalized about American soldiers in Vietnam as being baby-killers and torturers. Such things certainly happened but Kerry made the blame collective, except for himself of course.

As for Hagel, suffice it to say that the embarrassing quotes and actions from him in the past — including his opposition to sanctions against Iran — fueled a response to his proposed nomination so strong that the administration had to back down for a while.

What would have happened if President Harry Truman turned over American defense, diplomacy, and intelligence in 1946 to those who said that Stalin wanted peace and that Communist rule in Central Europe was a good thing?

Obama has been president of the United States for four years. Yet in foreign policy, having some decent and competent people in high positions mitigated the damage. Well, the reins are now loosed; the muzzle is off

Shoot, the Gun Grab Threats are Toothless

Facts – they just don’t matter like they used to.

Neither does the Constitution, if you listen to Joe Biden, New York Governor Cuomo, and other politicians grabbing the microphones to take advantage of the low information voters’ short attention span by proposing a series of unconstitutional restrictions on gun ownership (or Nancy Pelosi on the 14th Amendment).

Kimberly Strassel explains very clearly why any sweeping gun reforms being bruited about will be dead on arrival:

On the other side is the reality that any of these proposals must, in the normal course of things, pass Congress. A few quick facts about that body. 1) More than half of its members have an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association. 2) The few members today calling for gun control are the same few who have always called for gun control. 3) The House is run by Republicans.

Despite the press’s exuberant efforts to cast congressional gun supporters as having changed their minds, there has been no actual movement. Senate Democrat Joe Manchin caused a media sensation when he declared, immediately after Sandy Hook, that nobody needed “30 rounds in a clip.” Less reported was that it took the Democrat about the time necessary for your average West Virginian to drive to a ballot box to clarify that statement and to add that he’s “so proud of the NRA.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, even with the press’s best efforts to parse his remarks, has committed himself to nothing more than a “thoughtful debate.”

Montana’s Jon Tester and Max Baucus, Alaska’s Mark Begich, Arkansas’s Mark Pryor, South Dakota’s Tim Johnson, Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu — all are quiet on that red-state Democratic front. North Dakota’s brand new senator, Heidi Heitkamp, declared proposals mulled by the Biden task force as “way in the extreme” and “not gonna pass.” Unlike Mr. Obama, all of these members still face elections.

Over in the House, when asked recently what was more likely — passage of gun control or Speaker John Boehner becoming a pagan — a senior GOP leadership aide told Buzzfeed: “Probably the latter.”

A related piece.

Last Night, I Learned About Real Courage

 

Mollie Hemingway, Ed. · January 14, 2013 at 8:18am

Mark and I watched a bit of the Golden Globes last night. I learned about how very many “journeys” all of these actors and directors are on. And they have travel partners who make their journeys possible. And they go all the way, on these journeys, from being an actor who hadn’t yet performed that given role to being an actor who had. What a journey!

Neil Armstrong went on a journey. I am not entirely sure Django Unchained‘s Christopher Waltz did the same.

Anyway, the other thing actors and directors did was show bravery and courage. Mostly the evening was focused on hailing the anti-Sarah Palin movie Game Change. Yawn.

Director Jay Roach explained just how “brave” Julianne Moore was to mock Sarah Palin in her role. To which I’ll offer up two tweets in response:

@MoRocca: Yes, so brave of Hollywood actress Julianne Moore to make fun of Sarah Palin.

@AndyLevy: Haven’t been able to tweet since learning how brave it was for Julianne Moore to play Sarah Palin cuz I’m afraid she’ll never work again

Making a movie, starring known stage and screen talents, based off of one of the most popular musicals of all time shows courage, said star Hugh Jackman:

“Les Miserables is a project of passion; it took a lot of courage to make it,” declared the handsome actor before thanking his cast mates and his wife Deborra-Lee Furness in a passionate and heart-felt speech.

Writing about your experiences to the acclaim of all elites shows courage:

9:30 p.m. Modern Family nominee Julie Bowen commends comedy actress winner Lena Dunham’s courage and tells THR she lives HBO’s Girls. “I wish I had her courage,” she says. “I’m so glad that generation has someone to tell their stories.”

Michael J. Fox’s son Sam Michael made his debut as Mr. Golden Globe, thereby showing … courage:

Sam has never had any showbiz aspirations, so this was kind of out of the blue,” his famous dad told Access Hollywood Sunday night. “I love that he’s got the courage and the curiosity and the sense of adventure to do it.”

Even the Hollywood Foreign Press Association showed courage, according to the San Francisco Chronicle:

the Hollywood Foreign Press even demonstrated a bit of courage in passing over some TV stalwarts in favor of it-woman Lena Dunham and her brilliant HBO series “Girls.”

It’s humbling to be around so much courage. Maybe I can take a journey like theirs someday, where I will also learn about bravery.

http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Last-Night-I-Learned-About-Real-Courage

The whole article is worth reading.  It is amazing the level of deluded narcissism Hollywood is capable of.

I called this section Evil and Insanity.  The reason for the first is because I remember once hearing that the opposition is not evil, just wrong.  Watching what is going on in this country now I can no longer agree.  Our opposition is evil, actually.  The commit evil, support evil and actively worship evil now.  I don’t mean this in a religious way either, I mean this in a solid, there is good and evil, no shades of gray way.

Secondly I said Insanity.  What we are seeing is insanity in action.  Ensuring a future where the children of this country are endangered even more in order to advance an agenda is both evil and insane.  The gun grabbers plans would leave the most defenseless as human sacrifices on the altar of liberalism.  If they were serious we would follow the lead of several schools around the nation and allow off duty Deputies and Police Officers armed with purchased  AR-15′s to protect our children.
But in the word of the token lib on Hannity’s radio show today.  “We can’t have armed security, because they could potentially be a danger.”

 

Evil and Insanity people.  Coming soon to your schools, homes, workplace, grocery store, and everywhere else.

The Age of Narcissism

by Mars ( 98 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Blogmocracy, Education, Entertainment, Free Speech, Guest Post, Health Care, Media, Political Correctness at January 13th, 2013 - 7:44 pm

We have entered a new era in this country.  One I am not proud to be part of nor do I wish for it’s survival into our future.  We are now in the age of narcissism.  Much was made of the “me” generation several years back, but they had nothing on this current generation of egomaniacs.  Things have gotten so bad that even the Psychology/Psychiatric industry have taken notice.  A few years ago (during O’s run up to the presidency) they began the process of removing Narcissistic Personality Disorder from the upcoming release of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition.

What has brought this on?  How about a school system that rewards mediocrity?  How about sporting events that no longer even keep score in the fear of alienating someone?  How about a culture that embraces relativism at any cost?  Also much damage has been done by an internet culture that convinces every teen out there that his/her opinion is not only equal but actually superior to all others.  Twitter, Facebook, and many others have convinced teens that they are wise beyond their years, they consider their follower counts as proof of their abilities and importance.  Now we have a President in this country that represents what they have always believed about themselves, that the “cool factor” is all that matters.  It doesn’t matter one whit that he has accomplished nothing of substance, it doesn’t matter that he continues to destroy any chance of a future that any of these kids could ever have.  All that matters is that he is cool.  He’s not a boring, old, white man with too much money and not enough coolness.

 

The Age of Narcissism is upon us, may it die soon.

 

 

 

We are raising a generation of deluded narcissists

By

Published January 08, 2013

FoxNews.com

 

A new analysis of the American Freshman Survey, which has accumulated data for the past 47 years from 9 million young adults, reveals that college students are more likely than ever to call themselves gifted and driven to succeed, even though their test scores and time spent studying are decreasing.

Psychologist Jean Twenge, the lead author of the analysis, is also the author of a study showing that the tendency toward narcissism in students is up 30 percent in the last thirty-odd years.
This data is not unexpected.  I have been writing a great deal over the past few years about the toxic psychological impact of media and technology on children, adolescents and young adults, particularly as it regards turning them into faux celebrities—the equivalent of lead actors in their own fictionalized life stories.

On Facebook, young people can fool themselves into thinking they have hundreds or thousands of “friends.” They can delete unflattering comments. They can block anyone who disagrees with them or pokes holes in their inflated self-esteem. They can choose to show the world only flattering, sexy or funny photographs of themselves (dozens of albums full, by the way), “speak” in pithy short posts and publicly connect to movie stars and professional athletes and musicians they “like.”

Using Twitter, young people can pretend they are worth “following,” as though they have real-life fans, when all that is really happening is the mutual fanning of false love and false fame.

 

A Fate That Narcissists Will Hate: Being Ignored

By CHARLES ZANOR
Published: November 29, 2010

 

Narcissists, much to the surprise of many experts, are in the process of becoming an endangered species.

Not that they face imminent extinction — it’s a fate much worse than that. They will still be around, but they will be ignored.

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (due out in 2013, and known as DSM-5) has eliminated five of the 10 personality disorders that are listed in the current edition.

Narcissistic personality disorder is the most well-known of the five, and its absence has caused the most stir in professional circles.

Most nonprofessionals have a pretty good sense of what narcissism means, but the formal definition is more precise than the dictionary meaning of the term.

Our everyday picture of a narcissist is that of someone who is very self-involved — the conversation is always about them. While this characterization does apply to people with narcissistic personality disorder, it is too broad. There are many people who are completely self-absorbed who would not qualify for a diagnosis of N.P.D.

The central requirement for N.P.D. is a special kind of self-absorption: a grandiose sense of self, a serious miscalculation of one’s abilities and potential that is often accompanied by fantasies of greatness. It is the difference between two high school baseball players of moderate ability: one is absolutely convinced he’ll be a major-league player, the other is hoping for a college scholarship.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/health/views/30mind.html?_r=0

 

 

You Useful Idiots Voted For This

by coldwarrior ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Education, Elections 2012, Elections 2016, Open thread at December 22nd, 2012 - 3:00 pm

Open Thread

 

You Useful Idiots Voted For This! Deal with it.

 

American Dream Fades for Generation Y Professionals

After being dismissed from her job as a Midtown Manhattan securities attorney in October 2009, Christina Tretter-Herriger hitched a used horse trailer to her Dodge Ram pickup and drove 1,628 miles to Texas.

The 32-year-old lawyer sold skin-care products in Houston before finding work as the assistant general counsel of a futures-trading firm where an irate customer punctuated a recorded voice-mail message with gunfire.

“No one was left with the impression that he just happened to be phoning from a sporting clays range,” she says.

Eighteen months and two busted jobs later, the daughter of a retired physician and a former editor at Vogue circled back to upstate New York and hunkered down at a small legal office that pays about one-quarter of her former $165,000 salary.

Generation Y professionals entering the workforce are finding careers that once were gateways to high pay and upwardly mobile lives turning into detours and dead ends. Average incomes for individuals ages 25 to 34 have fallen 8 percent, double the adult population’s total drop, since the recession began in December 2007. Their unemployment rate remains stuck one-half to 1 percentage point above the national figure.

Three and a half years after the worst recession since the Great Depression, the earnings and employment gap between those in the under-35 population and their parents and grandparents threatens to unravel the American dream of each generation doing better than the last. The nation’s younger workers have benefited least from an economic recovery that has been the most uneven in recent history.

‘Permanently Depressed’

“This generation will be permanently depressed and will be on a lower path of income for probably all of their life — and at least the next 10 years,” says Rutgers professor Cliff Zukin, a senior research fellow at the university’s John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development. Professionals who start out in jobs other than their first choice tend to stay on the alternative path, earning less than they would have otherwise while becoming less likely to start over again later in preferred fields, Zukin says.

Michael Greenstone, who was chief economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers in 2009 and 2010, says the shift to a downwardly mobile society may be lasting. “Children are not earning as much as their parents, and I think we’re laying the seeds for that to continue into the future,” he says.

Only one-fifth of those who graduated college since 2006 expect greater success than their parents, a Rutgers survey found earlier this year. Little more than half were working full time. Just one in five said their job put them on a career path.

Disappearing Jobs

Those who finish only high school or drop out fare worse. Almost four out of five jobs destroyed by the recession were held by workers with a high school diploma or less, according to Georgetown University’s Center on Education and the Workforce.

Middle-income jobs are disappearing for a wide range of young professionals. The number of financial counselors and loan officers ages 25 to 34 has dropped 40 percent since 2007, outpacing the 30 percent drop in total jobs for the profession, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Similarly, the number of hours logged by first-year and mid-level legal associates — a productivity measure of young lawyers — fell 12 percent from 2007 at some of New York’s largest law firms, says Jeff Grossman, national managing director of Wells Fargo Private Bank’s Legal Specialty Group in Charlotte, North Carolina. Yet profits per partner climbed $50,697 to $1.5 million on revenue of $66 billion last year, according to a separate survey of 86 of the world’s top law firms by The American Lawyer magazine.

Lost Faith

“I had a lot of faith in the system, the mythology that if you work really hard you can achieve anything, and the stock market always goes up,” says 2009 law school graduate Elizabeth Hallock, 33. “It was pretty naïve on my part.”

Hallock is the named plaintiff in one of 14 lawsuits against some of the nation’s best-known law schools, including her alma mater, the University of San Francisco School of Law. The civil complaints, filed in 2011 and 2012, accuse the institutions of overstating graduates’ job-placement results and incomes.

Young Americans are struggling to reconcile their lack of economic rewards with their relatively privileged upbringings by Baby Boomer parents and the material success of their older peers, Generation X, born in the late 1960s and 1970s, says Kathy Sheehan, general manager of GfK Consumer Trends and Roper Reports, a unit of German-based research firm GfK.

Great Expectations

“It’s a generation that had really high expectations, in some part driven by the way they were raised by their boomer parents,” she says. “Yet in the past five years they have had reality slammed in their face by the employment situation.”

About 61 million people, one-fifth of the U.S. population, work at jobs where median earnings declined since 2007 even as the 1.2 million households whose incomes put them in the top 1 percent saw their pay rise 5.5 percent last year. Younger workers are experiencing the worst of the disparity in part because they’re being displaced by older workers. The number of employees ages 55 to 64 is expected to surpass the under-24 working population by 2020 for the first time since at least World War II, according to the BLS.

Dashed expectations crimped even some of the most innovative corners of the economy. Daniel White was wrapping up a week-long vacation to Vermont two summers ago when a co-worker at Chicago-based Groupon Inc. (GRPN) called to share the news that White was about to be fired from the e-commerce discounter.

Father’s Power

The 27-year-old business school graduate was living from paycheck to paycheck, cold-calling hair salons and pizza parlors in Youngstown, Ohio, from crowded offices at company headquarters when he found himself out on the street.

“To be honest, I’m glad it happened,” he says. “I guess I owe that to Steve Jobs, who made getting fired cool.”

This year, White says, he hopes to earn $2,000 at his own startup Web-sales venture in Burlington, Vermont, seeing technology as the one path to potentially matching his father’s generation, “the people with the money and power.”

In more traditional jobs, the fallout from the subprime- mortgage collapse a half-decade ago continues to pummel people, including the architects who designed homes. The number of them ages 25 to 34 has fallen by 41 percent since 2007, compared with the total drop in the profession of 25 percent.

At the Seattle architectural firm of Callison LLC, faces and names began to disappear from the staff directory almost immediately after new hire Eli Hardi joined in January 2008.

Smaller Paychecks

“People would drop off on a daily basis,” says Hardi, 28, a recent graduate of a five-year architecture degree program in California. Within a few months, Hardi rose from an hourly to salaried position. The promotion wiped out overtime pay and reduced his annual income by 12 percent to $39,500, he says.

The smaller paycheck reflected cost-cutting that has erased 40 percent of U.S. architectural firms’ revenue and almost one- third of their personnel since early 2008, according to the American Institute of Architects in Washington.

Hardi worked through Christmas and New Year’s before being laid off during the first week of January 2009, 13 months after his hiring. He walked home in the cold to his apartment and new big-screen TV that was now a symbol of his uprooted ambitions.

“It’s a bit sudden, a bit jarring,” he says. Still, “there’s a certain sense of relief that you don’t have to deal with the sword hanging over your head. I almost felt worse for the people who had to stay, knowing they might lose their jobs.”

Highest Unemployment

Architecture graduates ages 25 to 29 had the highest unemployment rate of 57 degree programs surveyed by the Education Department in 2009. Their 9.6 percent jobless level rivaled the 10.6 percent unemployment for all Americans ages 25 to 29 that year, including those without college degrees. Nursing fared the best with a 1.5 percent jobless rate.

Hardi was called back, at his previous salary, in January 2010 as Callison won store-design work for Apple Inc. (AAPL)

“The hours were long, the pay was low and we got a notice saying the bonus would be minimal,” he says. “The hardest part, I found, is to maintain your own self respect and dignity.” In March, he quit to join a smaller firm where he works on historical renovations.

The same housing crash that hammered young architects and loan officers also slammed lawyers. Law schools are turning out about 45,000 degree holders a year for about 25,000 full-time positions available to them, according to the National Association for Law Placement Inc. in Washington. The class of 2011 had the lowest placement with law firms, 49.5 percent, in 36 years.

Tougher Path

“It is not the perfect path to wealth and success that people may have envisioned,” says Robin Sparkman, editor in chief of The American Lawyer magazine in New York.

Some of the disenchanted have taken their complaints to court. Plaintiffs’ attorneys and recent law-school graduates are pushing to change what they call law schools’ overstated reports of post-graduation employment numbers. The results are used in magazine rankings of the institutions and to recruit new applicants. In state-court lawsuits, the former students allege false advertising and consumer fraud.

The claims are “meritless,” says Angie Davis, spokeswoman for the University of San Francisco School of Law. “We are sympathetic to the difficulty faced by law school graduates nationwide in finding employment on the heels of the Great Recession,” she says, adding the university helps students find work, and many have found “successful, rewarding careers.”

Contested Lawsuits

With the lawsuits playing out, the Chicago-based American Bar Association began requiring accredited schools to disclose far more detailed information about new graduates’ employment beginning in December 2011.

This July, San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Harold Kahn allowed lawsuits against USF and Golden Gate University to proceed, ruling that some law-school graduates may have a basis for claims that they were deceived. Judges in Illinois and Michigan rejected similar complaints.

“It’s hard to look at the information the schools were putting out and say it’s not misleading,” says Derek Tokaz, research director of the nonprofit Law School Transparency initiative. It published research showing that the chance of recent graduates getting permanent full-time work in law was far lower than the 80-95 percent total employment rates the schools typically boasted.

Lehman Fallout

Tokaz, 28, worked with Tretter-Herriger at the Manhattan law firm of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP. She joined the firm in September 2008, the same month that Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed, gradually setting off panic on Wall Street and around the world.

The late nights and long weeks awaited by first-year associates as a grueling rite of passage didn’t come, she says. Instead, there was so little work to do that the hedge fund lawyers and recruiters she worked with frequently retreated after lunch to a street-level pub to watch English soccer.

Tretter-Herriger says she and some other first-year associates were fired 13 months later with the proviso they could keep their desks and look for jobs through October. She found one at the Houston futures trading firm. When it later outsourced some of its legal work, she moved on again and answered an ad on Craigslist for a job in Buffalo, New York.

She now complements her $45,000 lawyer’s salary by training horses and giving riding lessons. She says she’d like to buy a rental property and become self-sufficient in case she loses this job.

“As it is, all of my possessions still fit in the back of my truck,” she says. “I can pack it in a couple hours, pick up the trailer and horses and move anywhere the gas tank will take me at the drop of a hat. What can the system take away from you when you have that kind of freedom?”

Bill Clinton Requested $60 million to Place Cops in Schools

by huckfunn ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Bill Clinton, Crime, Democratic Party, Education, Headlines, Media, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Second Amendment, Weapons at December 22nd, 2012 - 10:24 am

Yesterday the NRA proposed placing armed police officers in every school to protect our children and the media has gone into full mockery mode. However, in April 2000, on the one year anniversary of the Columbine massacre, Bill Clinton essentially made the same proposal and the media was just fine with it.

Today, the same elite media who no doubt send their own kids to private schools that employ armed security, just can’t stop howling ridicule at the NRA’s idea to give every student in America those same protections. Because the NRA’s idea is so appealing, as I write this, the media’s going overboard, mocking it as bizarre, crazy, and out of touch.

This is how the media works to silence and vilify the opposition and to ensure that only their ideas control The Narrative. The media doesn’t care about securing our schools; they only care about coming after our guns and handing Obama another political win.

The media also doesn’t care how wildly hypocritical they look.

In their zeal to rampage this left-wing agenda, the media has apparently forgotten that back in 2000, on the one-year anniversary of the Columbine shooting (which occurred with an assault weapons ban in place), President Clinton requested $60 million in federal money to fund a fifth round of funding for a program called “COPS in School,” a program that does exactly what the NRA is proposing and the media is currently in overdrive mocking.

Clinton also unveiled the $60-million fifth round of funding for “COPS in School,” a Justice Department program that helps pay the costs of placing police officers in schools to help make them safer for students and teachers. The money will be used to provide 452 officers in schools in more than 220 communities.

“Already, it has placed 2,200 officers in more than 1,000 communities across our nation, where they are heightening school safety as well as coaching sports and acting as mentors and mediators for kids in need,” Clinton said.

Read the whole article here. Hat tip – Breitbart

Guest Post: On the tragic loss of 20 innocent children

by coldwarrior ( 100 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Democratic Party, Education, Free Speech, government, Hate Speech, Liberal Fascism, Open thread, Patriotism, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Second Amendment, Theocratic Progressives at December 15th, 2012 - 10:49 am

The Saturday Lecture can be found posted earlier.

 

From Dorian

On the tragic loss of 20 innocent children.

Posted by doriangrey1 on December 15, 2012

Many if not most people in America today are, in the wake of events on Connecticut, failing to understand the significance of that tragic event. Some see only the evil perpetrated by the young gunman, others, the liberals amongst us and a great percentage of the political class seem to be focusing their attention exclusively on the guns that he used and missing the point that the guns didn’t kill anyone out of their own volition. The truth however is that the political class and the liberals are not missing the point, they are intentionally acting to obfuscate the point. What they do not want you or anyone else to focus on is the responsibility that the individual bare in their actions.

If the individual is responsible, then there is nothing that the political class can do. Their are no laws they can pass, no money for them to appropriate, no committees to chair, no hearing to hold, no power to be obtained. It really is that simple.

What the shooter in Connecticut did when he took all those poor innocent lives was endemic of a mentality that has been carefully cultured in our society by our political class and the Fifth Column Treasonous Media. They have carefully nurtured a hedonistic narcissistic class of individuals for whom the notion of personal responsibility is alien and foreign. They have done this over the last 5 or 6 decades for one very simple reason, because it is profitable for them.

The media uses the allure and promise of sex to sell everything from candy to shoes. 15 and 16 year old girls are sexed up to sell lipstick, face-cream and hair care products to 30 and 40 year old women under the unspoken promise that if they just use these products they will look and feel like teenagers again. Scantily clad women are used to sell mid 20 through 50 year old men practically every product known to man, from shaving cream to power-tools and alcohol.

For the political class, the less each individual is responsible for their own actions, the more the state must step in and intervene and assume that responsibility. With each failure of the individual to take responsibility for their own action another law must be passed, another committee must be chaired, a study must be funded money and power must flow to those in the political class who will protect society from the wanton abandonment of moral and ethical responsibility by the individual.

Through propaganda and indoctrination that spanned his entire life, the young man who took so many innocent lives in Connecticut had carefully been conditioned to think certain things. What some of those things were can be deduced by the nature of the actions that he took. Through years of indoctrination he had been taught to see the entire world as revolving around him. His want’s, desires, needs, goals, aspirations, for his entire life he was taught that these were the most important things in life.

Moreover and perhaps even more importantly he had been indoctrinated into believing that the responsibility for, and any consequences of, his actions existed exclusively in the hear and now. In order for anyone to commit an atrocity of the nature and magnitude that he did there are several things that it is absolutely imperative that you believe.

You absolutely have to believe that something in your life is so painful and torturous so impossible to endure that the only possible solution, the only conceivable alleviation of that suffering is the heinous atrocity you are perpetrating. You have to be completely and totally of the belief that any consequence that might come after your actions is worth enduring in order to provide the relief from your current situation.

What we know by the Connecticut shooters final act is, that he did not believe that there would be any eternal consequences that would compare to those that he would face here and now because of his actions. By committing this atrocity and then killing himself he made the simple statement, Game Over, I Win.

No, it was not the guns fault, it was not the fault of inadequate firearms regulations, it wasn’t the fault of poor or insufficient mental health care. It wasn’t even the fault of the people around this young man who failed to see the warning signs of his coming actions. Regardless of the amount or degree of vile and despicable indoctrination from the Fifth Column Treasonous Media heaped on him during his life, honestly it isn’t even their fault. No matter how much the media indoctrinated him to believe that his needs could supersede those of his victims, that when he died it was over and there was nothing else, in the end, that young man, and no one else is responsible for his actions.

Meanwhile back in the real world, the carrion feeders in the Fifth Column Treasonous Media and the Political Class continue to put every bit of energy they can muster into finding any and every conceivable way to exploit this tragedy, to wring every last dollar, every last microgram of power and authority out of a shocked, horrified and painfully vulnerable public. The vultures in the Fifth Column Treasonous Media will interview the shocked and devastated survivors while the Political Class parasites pontificate and bluster with great verbosity attempting at all costs to assign blame for this horrific tragedy on something that they can exercise authority over. This is the culture they have created, that they knowingly and with a foreknowledge of malice continue to sustain.

Why? Because as I said before, it is profitable to them, power and money. Yes, it really is that simple.

Bailout Nation. Next up… $1Trillion Bailout for Student Loans

by huckfunn ( 188 Comments › )
Filed under Bailouts, Barack Obama, Corruption, Cult of Obama, Debt, Democratic Party, Economy, Education, Elections 2012, government, Politics, Socialism, taxation, unemployment at November 30th, 2012 - 6:00 pm

 

We had a brief discussion of the possible bailout/forgiveness of student loans several days ago, and here we are. Congressman Hanson Clarke (D-MI) has proposed H.R. 4170, the Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012. You can see from the chart above that the student loan delinquency rate spiked to a record 11% during the presidential campaign on speculation that Obama would be reelected. Inasmuch as that nightmare has occurred and an actual bailout bill has been proposed, it’s a pretty safe bet that the delinquency rate will will continue straight up.

America’s now-nationalized student loan industry just reached a value of $1 trillion, according to Citigroup, growing at a 20 percent-per-year pace. Since President Obama nationalized the industry (a tacked-on provision of the Obamacare bill), tuition has gone up 25 percent and the three-year default rate is at a record 13.4 percent.

With many young people unable to pay their loans (average graduating debt is about $29,000), Citigroup and others are speculating that this industry might be ripe for a bailout.

To pay off all the current defaults, Citigroup says it would cost taxpayers $74 billion. However, this number doesn’t include those who will default in the coming years, and, when the government rewards the defaulters, it will encourage more borrowers not to pay their debts.

And liberals in Congress have proposed forgiving all student loans via “The Student Loan Forgiveness Act 2012,” costing taxpayers $1 trillion.

Adding another $1 trillion dollars to the national debt isn’t exactly “forgiveness” for young people—it’s prolonging the payoff. In fact, student loan bailouts are a catch-22 for young people because they’re going to be held accountable for paying off the national debt and interest payments.

A student loan bailout will also be rewarding higher education bureaucrats for a diminished product. A college degree used to mean that a person would add on average $1 million to their income over their lifetime. Today a college degree only guarantees an average $300,000 in added income over a lifetime.

Continue reading here. HT – Breitbart

UKIP on the Rise?

by coldwarrior ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Economy, Education, Elections 2012, English Defence League, Multiculturalism, Open thread, Politics, Religion, Special Report, UK at November 29th, 2012 - 3:00 pm

Interesting news…

Could this be Ukip’s day?

Rotherham is usually a staunch Labour town, but ahead of Thursday’s by-election, many locals are in the mood for change

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? - Could this be Ukip’s day?

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? Photo: Guzelian

It is a ramshackle campaign office, with a loo that has yet to be plumbed in and two deckchairs for seating. But this little property is one of the busiest places in Rotherham, with a stream of volunteers coming in and out, and camera crews setting up outside.

The former clothes boutique – “two floors of fashion” is still written on the front window – is home to the UK Independence Party’s campaign in the South Yorkshire town. Today, Rotherham goes to the polls in a parliamentary by-election. That all the talk is about Ukip rather than Labour, which has provided the town’s MP since 1933, is a remarkable turn of events.

The by-election has been called because Denis MacShane, who as a Labour MP at one point enjoyed a 71 per share of the vote, has stepped down in disgrace after he fiddled his expenses. The assumption until a week ago was that however much the town disapproves of his behaviour, it would return another Labour MP. “You could put a red rosette on a donkey and it would get voted in,” says Peter Downey, owner of The Master Barber’s Shop.

However, Lisa Duffy, who is running Ukip’s office, says: “We are on a roll.” She brandishes a cheque for £500. “I’ve received £8,000 in donations just to this office since Saturday.”

This surge in support follows The Daily Telegraph’s report that the Labour-run council in Rotherham had taken three children from their foster parents because the couple were members of Ukip.

Some have cried foul, accusing Ukip of manipulating the foster parents – both former long-term Labour voters – to suit their own ends. But Ms Duffy is clear that the couple’s story has changed Rotherham’s perception of the party. “I think it’s made a huge difference. People are very angry about others telling them how to run their lives, and it’s opened them up to talking about us,” she says.

This PR coup was followed by Stuart Wheeler, Ukip’s treasurer, boasting of a possible eight Tory MPs defecting to the party, and the Conservative vice-chairman Michael Fabricant mooting a possible alliance ahead of the 2015 general election.

So is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party – which finished sixth at the general election in Rotherham – could pull off a victory here?

Of the four people I meet in The Master Barber’s Shop, one is a Labour voter, one would prefer not to say, and the other two – including its owner – say they are voting Ukip. This is not an unusual ratio. Wherever grumbling voters are gathered, you can find a significant clutch who say they are thinking of voting for party recently dismissed by David Cameron as being home to “mainly fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists”.

Mr Downey is clear what the appeal of the party is to this town’s voters: “Ukip are doing well here because of the flood of Eastern Europeans in Rotherham,” he says.

Dave Bennett, who is waiting to have his hair cut, agrees. “My mother-in-law will not now come into the town centre because of the amount of Eastern Europeans hanging around in groups. It’s just large groups of men standing around. People don’t want it.”

Mr Bennett might be dismissed as a “fruitcake” or even a “closet racist” by some in Westminster, but he is an NHS worker and lifelong Labour supporter. His views are echoed time and again on the doorsteps of the old Doncaster Road – in the shadow of the enormous Tata steel works, which announced 110 job losses last week. Many are happy to chat about the foster case and their willingness to vote Ukip.

Bryan and Barbara Archer, in their seventies, are not dissimilar to the foster parents themselves. He used to be in the Navy, she was a school teacher for 24 years; both are former Labour supporters. “It’s an utter disgrace what happened to those children,” Mrs Archer says. “Rotherham Council has done nothing but bring shame to this town. They’ve shown us up with EDL [English Defence League] marches and children being exploited. This used to be a lovely town.”

Rotherham centre is still a handsome, bustling place, dominated by the impressive minster, but you don’t have to travel far to find boarded-up shops and a tattoo parlour that has taken up residence in the Temperance Hall. Its glory days as a coal and steel town are well over.

Victoria Parker, aged 26, who is picking up her child Elise from school, says: “The last job I had was six years ago at McDonald’s. It’s been so hard to get a job.”

Would she consider voting for Jane Collins – “she’s a local Yorkshire lass, from a mining family” – asks Ian Clay, a local solicitor out canvassing for Ukip’s candidate. Like others that Clay meets, Ms Parker gives him a warm reception. “I’m certainly thinking about it.”

The feedback from many of the residents is that it is time for a change. What is curious is that so much of their disaffection has led to support for Ukip – a party that began as a one-issue outfit, and an issue that appears to have little relevance in this town.

The party does now have a proper manifesto, with eye-catching and uncosted promises designed to appeal to disillusioned Tories at the libertarian end of the party: a return to smoking in public places, getting rid of employers’ national insurance contributions, a new flat rate of tax, prison sentences to double, student numbers to halve, free eye tests for all citizens.

But these promises – particularly its two central ones: to put a temporary halt to all immigration, and to hold a referendum about pulling out of Europe – have struck a bell far from its roots in the Home Counties, where many regard it as only a half-serious outfit supported by eccentric celebrities such as Peter Stringfellow, the nightclub owner, and Neil Hamilton, the disgraced former MP.

Mrs Archer says: “You work hard all your life for a comfortable retirement and for what? It’s blown away in the wind. There’s all this money being given away to the EU, which could be spent here.”

The economic chaos in Europe has been helpful to Ukip, which believes it has the wind in its sails. Nigel Farage, its leader, claimed the party was “the third force in British politics” after the Corby by-election earlier this month, when it won 14 per cent of the vote and forced the Lib Dems into an embarrassing, deposit-losing fourth place.

Some psephologists believe that Ukip’s importance is over-stated. Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London, disagrees that it could cause many Tories with slim majorities to lose their seats: “If Ukip withdrew, some of these people might not vote at all, some might – believe it or not – vote Lib Dem, some might vote for a more radical party. Only in a handful of seats did Ukip make a difference. It’s nowhere near the 20 or 30 suggested.”

Despite the momentum, Ukip is still small, with a mere 19,000 members – the equivalent of just a few tables of pub drinkers in each constituency. But these sums appear to hold little truck in Rotherham, where the lack of jobs and prospects are the main concerns.

Jodie Dolby, a 19-year-old unemployed mother, says she’s considering Ukip because, “I think there’s a lot more immigration now.” Does she worry that some might think that curbing immigration is racist?

“No way. My daughter’s dad is Asian. My grandma is Asian. But there are a lot more people coming in, getting properties, and all the money is going back, not staying here.”

Mr Downey in his barber shop is clear that Rotherham is a world away from Westminster: “What is classed as racist is determined by white middle-class people down in London, not by minorities up here.”