► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘Medicare’ Category

Saturday Morning Lecture: Tropical Disease Guides the Hand of History.

by coldwarrior ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under American Supremacy, History, Medicare, Open thread, Transportation, saturday lecture series at July 31st, 2010 - 8:00 am

This was a lecture that i delivered some years ago at a local university for 20th Century America:

In the late 19th century and early 20th Century America was standing on the edge of becoming a World Power. War with Spain and American expansion into the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific Ocean was driven by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, a belief in Manifest Destiny, and, in a historical twist of fate, a plasmodium and a flavivirus epidemic. The Malaria and Yellow Fever that stopped the French from building the Panama Canal were in turn stopped by the Americans who finished the projects and controlled the Canal Zone for 70 plus years thereby controlling rapid access between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

President T Roosevelt was an Imperialist to the core. He saw American foreign policy as activist. He viewed the World in two ways. The first was the civilized world. These were industrial and were predominantly white. Then there was the uncivilized world. These produced raw materials and were non-white, Latin, or Slavic. Japan was considered civilized because they were industrial. The civilized world had the right to intervene with the uncivilized nations in order to preserve order and stability.

This attitude can be seen in the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. This states that America had the right and the duty to not only oppose European intervention in the American hemisphere (aka the American Lake) but to also intervene when a country proved unable to maintain order and national sovereignty on their own.

This came out of the German, English, and Italian blockade on Venezuela in 1902. Venezuela was having problems paying back international loans so they sent their navies. The US Navy convinced the Europeans to leave. The Corollary was used again and again as justification for action. However, the most creative use of the Roosevelt Corollary was over the Panama Canal.

The geography of Central America combined with the time it takes to sail around South America to get from the Atlantic to the Pacific made an all water canal on the Isthmus of Panama the obvious choice to Charles V, HRE and King of Spain as early as 1534. He ordered a survey of the area so that perhaps a canal could be built so that the Spanish ships could bet from Spain to Peru more rapidly. This would give the Spanish a great tactical and military advantage over the Portuguese.

Other attempts and surveys continued until the French began a serious dig in 1880. The plan was driven by the success of the Suez Canal. The French had control of a strip of land on the Isthmus of Panama. Unfortunately for the French, Panama is a jungle. The Suez canal is in a desert. The Panamanian jungle diseases would stop the French in their tracks.

The French did not have an adequate understanding of disease vectors, nor did they study the geography and hydrology of the area enough to ensure success. Malaria, Yellow Fever, and cave-ins form rain hampered and eventually halted French operations in Panama. The hos[pitals themselves were aiding the diseases. The French had the posts of the be sitting in bowls of water to keep the crawling insects away from the patients. These bowls of water were the perfect breeding ground for the mosquitos that carry Yellow Fever and Malaria. The French abandoned Panama in 1893 leaving 22,000 dead workers, almost all of the deaths were from Malaria and Yellow Fever..

“The basic elements of the life cycle are the same for all Plasmodium sp. transmission begins when a female Anopheles mosquito feeds on a person with malaria and ingests blood containing gametocytes. During the following 1 to 2 wk, gametocytes inside the mosquito reproduce sexually and produce infective sporozoites. When the mosquito feeds on another human, sporozoites are inoculated and quickly reach the liver and infect hepatocytes. The parasites mature into tissue schizonts within hepatocytes. Each schizont produces 10,000 to 30,000 merozoites, which are released into the bloodstream 1 to 3 wk later when the hepatocyte ruptures. Each merozoite can invade an RBC and there transform into a trophozoite. Trophozoites grow and develop into erythrocyte schizonts; schizonts produce further merozoites, which 48 to 72 h later rupture the RBC and are released in plasma. These merozoites then rapidly invade new RBCs, repeating the cycle. Some trophozoites develop into gametocytes, which are ingested by an Anopheles mosquito. They undergo sexual union in the gut of the mosquito, develop into oocysts, and release infective sporozoites, which migrate to the salivary glands. Manifestations common to all forms of malaria include fever and rigor—the malarial paroxysm, anemia, jaundice, splenomegaly, epatomegaly The malarial paroxysm coincides with release of merozoites from ruptured RBCs. The classic paroxysm starts with malaise, abrupt chills and fever rising to 39 to 41° C, rapid and thready pulse, polyuria, headache, myalgia, and nausea. After 2 to 6 h, fever falls, and profuse sweating occurs for 2 to 3 h, followed by extreme fatigue. Fever is often hectic at the start of infection. In established infections, malarial paroxysms typically occur about every 2 to 3 days depending on the species; intervals are not rigid. Splenomegaly usually becomes palpable by the end of the first week of clinical disease but may not occur with P. falciparum. The enlarged spleen is soft and prone to traumatic rupture. Splenomegaly may decrease with recurrent attacks of malaria as functional immunity develops. After many bouts, the spleen may become fibrotic and firm or, in some patients, becomes massively enlarged (tropical splenomegaly). Hepatomegaly usually accompanies splenomegaly”1.

“Yellow fever is a mosquito-borne flavivirus infection endemic in tropical South America and sub-Saharan Africa. Symptoms may include sudden onset of fever, relative bradycardia, headache, and, if severe, jaundice, hemorrhage, and multiple organ failure. Diagnosis is with viral culture and serologic tests. Treatment is supportive. Prevention involves vaccination and mosquito control. Infection ranges from asymptomatic (in 5 to 50% of cases) to a hemorrhagic fever with 50% mortality. Incubation lasts 3 to 6 days. Onset is sudden, with fever of 39 to 40° C, chills, headache, dizziness, and myalgias. The pulse is usually rapid initially but, by the 2nd day, becomes slow for the degree of fever (Faget’s sign). The face is flushed, and the eyes are injected. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, severe prostration, restlessness, and irritability are common. Mild disease may resolve after 1 to 3 days. However, in moderate or severe cases, the fever falls suddenly 2 to 5 days after onset, and a remission of several hours or days ensues. The fever recurs, but the pulse remains slow. Jaundice, extreme albuminuria, and epigastric tenderness with hematemesis often occur together after 5 days of illness. There may be oliguria, petechiae, mucosal hemorrhages, confusion, and apathy. Disease may last > 1 wk with rapid recovery and no sequelae. In the most severe form (called malignant yellow fever), delirium, intractable hiccups, seizures, coma, and multiple organ failure may occur terminally. During recovery, bacterial super-infections, particularly pneumonia, can occur2.”

In 1898, 5 years after the French quit Panama, with the United States and Spain on the brink of war, the Oregon — the U.S. Navy’s first true battleship — took 67 days to rush back from San Francisco to the Caribbean. That event stuck in the mind of Theodore Roosevelt. When William McKinley’s assassination made TR president in 1901, he vowed to build a canal — not for commerce, like the French, but to ensure that U.S. naval power could dominate two oceans. He favored Nicaragua at first but abruptly changed his mind to Colombian-owned Panama when the French made it known they were willing to unload their partly dug ditch at a bargain price of $40 million. A skeptical Congress was eventually swayed with a high-powered lobbying campaign by France’s former chief engineer Philippe Bunau-Varilla, who’d made it his mission to see the project completed. At the last moment, Colombia nearly threw a wrench in the deal by insisting that the United States pay for the right to dig on Colombian soil, but the White House and the Panama Canal lobby were not to be stopped. The Columbian diplomats in Washington under great pressure agreed to a $10 million dollar payment and an annual rent of $250,000. The Columbian Senate refused to ratify this agreement. They wanted $20 million plus. However, at the time the isthmus was part of Columbia. What the Columbians did not realize was that they were on the uncivilized list and the Roosevelt Corollary would soon be visited upon their country.

“We were dealing with a government of irresponsible bandits,” Roosevelt stormed. “I was prepared to . . . at once occupy the Isthmus anyhow, and proceed to dig the canal. But I deemed it likely that there would be a revolution in Panama soon.”

Teddy was right. The chief engineer of the New Panama Canal Company, Philippe Bunau-Varilla organized a local revolt in November 1903. Roosevelt immediately sent the battleship Nashville and a detachment of marines to Panama to support the new government. 1 Person and one donkey were killed in the ‘prevention’. The new, independent nation of Panama quickly gave the United States the go-ahead. The rebels gladly accepted Roosevelt’s $10 million offer, and they gave the United States complete control of a ten-mile wide canal zone. The Americans, however, could only use a portion of what the French had excavated. Over 48,000,000 cubic yards of earth moved through French back-breaking labor was useless as the Americans began to dig.

At first it was to be built in the lowlands in Nicaragua, this would cost $109 million. This would have prevented the need for a lock system but would require a much longer channel. The French had attempted to dig through Panama some years earlier but yellow fever and malaria proved too much for the laborers, the French sold the holdings for $40 million. To fix that situation, TR sent down Dr. William Gorgas to drain the swamps thereby getting rid of the mosquitoes; the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Anopheles are the carriers of yellow fever and malaria respectively.

In 1900, U.S. Army tropical disease expert Walter Reed proved what previous scientists had suspected — that the fever was transmitted not by poor sanitation or contact with infected people, but by certain species of female mosquitoes. The following year, in fever-ridden Havana, a Reed protégé named Col. William C. Gorgas staged a successful campaign to eradicate the mosquitoes; yellow fever disappeared.

Gorgas was assigned to Panama but ran into stiff resistance at first from budget-conscious bureaucrats — who thought, incredibly, that he wanted tons of old newspapers, which he needed to seal windows for fumigating, as reading material for fever patients. Finally, in April 1905, after the fever outbreak had killed 47 workers, Gorgas got the go-ahead and funding he needed. Over the next few months, he installed $90,000 worth of wire screens on windows and sent teams of health workers on a door-to-door search for mosquitoes and their eggs. They fumigated houses — several times if necessary — and enforced a ban on the old Panamanian custom of keeping water indoors in uncovered containers. They traced the movements of victims to determine where they’d been infected. By December, yellow fever had vanished from the Canal Zone And Malaria, as well as other tropical diseases, were greatly reduced.

The American canal builders started out almost as badly as the French: the first wave of laborers had to drive railroad spikes with axes because they hadn’t been given sledgehammers. The Roosevelt administration appointed the illustrious John Findley Wallace as head engineer. This former president of the American Society of Civil Engineers was accustomed to building low-stress projects in urban areas, and he left after just a year to take a job in the private sector.

His successor, John Stevens, lacked a college degree, but he was a rough-hewn outdoorsman who’d extended the Great Northern Railroad through the Rockies, using a mountain pass he himself had discovered. Stevens stopped digging and spent two years methodically building the infrastructure needed to stage the massive project — everything from sewers for Panama’s two cities to a bakery to supply his workers with bread. By early 1907, when Stevens was ready to resume digging, the effort was so well-organized that before long the workers were excavating 500,000 cubic yards of soil a month; more than double the French’s best performance. Stevens astutely realized that a sea-level canal would be too difficult, and convinced Roosevelt to opt for a canal with locks instead.

In 1907, chief engineer Stevens, tough as he was, began to crack under the pressure; he wrote a stinging letter to President Roosevelt accusing bureaucrats and politicians of stabbing him in the back and complaining that, “to me, the canal is only a big ditch.” Roosevelt quickly replaced him with Army officer Col. George W. Goethals, who led the project through its most arduous stages, including the excavation of the mountainous Culebra Cut. During this stage of excavation workers had to brave massive landslides that sometimes set work back for months at a time.

Even so, Goethals took the efficient system that Stevens had built and pushed it to ever-astonishing levels of performance. From 1907 to 1914, Goethals’ work force excavated nearly 215,000,000 cubic yards of earth, nearly three times what the French had accomplished. Goethals also supervised the construction of the locks advocated by Stevens, the biggest and most technologically advanced devices of their kind ever built. In Aug

August 1914, a cement boat, the Cristobal, made the first actual passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific, with Philippe Bunau-Varilla onboard. Two weeks later, on August 15, a ship named Ancon sailed on the first official interocean transit through the Panama Canal. Estimated height of earth excavated if it were piled: one city block wide by 19 miles high

“The canal,” Roosevelt said, “was by far the most important action I took in foreign affairs during the time I was President. When nobody could or would exercise efficient authority, I exercised it.”

Roosevelt was true to his word. He said he would no accept a third term, he would probably have not one the nomination because of the way he completely alienated the Conservatives in his party. So, in true TR form he went to Africa to go big game hunting.

As explained above, the path of history can be changed by the smallest of organisms. Had the French been able to control the Yellow Fever and Malaria mosquito vectors, they would have had control over the Panama Canal. The United States would not have had the opportunity to expand as rapidly as they did without the Canal. Eventually, the situation between the US, France, and Panama would have probably come to violence over use and control of the Canal. For instance, a Vichy or German controlled Canal during WW2 would have been totally unacceptable; invasion would be necessary. In this case, tropical disease guides the hand of history.

1http://www.unboundmedicine.com/merckmanual/ub/view/Merck-Manual-Pro/504083/all/Malaria?q=malaria

2http://www.unboundmedicine.com/merckmanual/ub/view/Merck-Manual-Pro/504111/all/Yellow_Fever?q=yellow%20fever

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Friday with the ‘hammer – Obama’s Act II

by Speranza ( 150 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Medicare, Politics, Progressives at July 16th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Dr. K. brings up several salient points:

1. Underestimate Barack Obama at your own risk

2.If you think that his first term (Act 1)  has been awful, just wait until Obama  gets a second term (Act 2) – that is when he will be making a major push for amnesty and even more regulations and government control of the economy

3. In effect,  Reaganism has been dismantled

4. Obamaism is not going to be easily reversed

by Charles Krauthammer

In the political marketplace, there’s now a run on Obama shares. The left is disappointed with the president. Independents are abandoning him in droves. And the right is already dancing on his political grave, salivating about November when, his own press secretary admitted Sunday, Democrats might lose the House.

I have a warning for Republicans: Don’t underestimate Barack Obama.

Consider what he has already achieved. Obamacare alone makes his presidency historic. It has irrevocably changed one-sixth of the economy, put the country inexorably on the road to national health care and, as acknowledged by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus but few others, begun one of the most massive wealth redistributions in U.S. history.

Second, there is major financial reform, which passed Congress on Thursday. Economists argue whether it will prevent meltdowns and bailouts as promised. But there is no argument that it will give the government unprecedented power in the financial marketplace. Its 2,300 pages will create at least 243 new regulations that will affect not only, as many assume, the big banks but just about everyone, including, as noted in one summary (the Wall Street Journal), “storefront check cashiers, city governments, small manufacturers, home buyers and credit bureaus.”

Third is the near $1 trillion stimulus, the largest spending bill in U.S. history. And that’s not even counting nationalizing the student loan program, regulating carbon emissions by Environmental Protection Agency fiat, and still-fitful attempts to pass cap-and-trade through Congress.

But Obama’s most far-reaching accomplishment is his structural alteration of the U.S. budget. The stimulus, the vast expansion of domestic spending, the creation of ruinous deficits as far as the eye can see are not easily reversed.

These are not mere temporary countercyclical measures. They are structural deficits because, as everyone from Obama on down admits, the real money is in entitlements, most specifically Medicare and Medicaid. But Obamacare freezes these out as a source of debt reduction. Obamacare’s $500 billion in Medicare cuts and $600 billion in tax increases are siphoned away for a new entitlement — and no longer available for deficit reduction.

The result? There just isn’t enough to cut elsewhere to prevent national insolvency. That will require massive tax increases — most likely a European-style value-added tax. Just as President Ronald Reagan cut taxes to starve the federal government and prevent massive growth in spending, Obama’s wild spending — and quarantining health-care costs from providing possible relief — will necessitate huge tax increases.

[...]

The next burst of ideological energy — massive regulation of the energy economy, federalizing higher education and “comprehensive” immigration reform (i.e., amnesty) — will require a second mandate, meaning reelection in 2012.

That’s why there’s so much tension between Obama and congressional Democrats. For Obama, 2010 matters little. If Democrats lose control of one or both houses, Obama will probably have an easier time in 2012, just as Bill Clinton used Newt Gingrich and the Republicans as the foil for his 1996 reelection campaign

[...]

The real prize is 2012. Obama sees far, farther than even his own partisans. Republicans underestimate him at their peril

Read the rest here: Obama’s next act

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Kagan lied to Supreme Court in 9/11 case, should be disbarred and Dhimmitude?

by savage ( 188 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Health Care, Judicial, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Medicare, Religion at June 29th, 2010 - 9:00 pm

From our good friend Alec Rawls.

As Obama’s solicitor general, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan urged the Court to dismiss the suit that our 9/11 families have been pressing against the Saudi government and several Saudi princes for their extensive funding of al Qaeda. The families sued under the domestic tort exception to sovereign immunity, which according to Kagan’s Supreme Court brief (at p. 14):

requires not merely that the foreign state’s extraterritorial conduct have some causal connection to tortious injury in the United States, but that “the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee” be committed within the United States. 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(5).

The “tortious act or omission” is the wrongful act (the tort) that leads to the injury. Thus she is claiming that for Saudi funding of al Qaeda to be actionable, the funding itself has to have been transacted within the United States. Compare this with the actual wording of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(5):

(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case – … (5) … in which money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property, occurring in the United States and caused by the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee of that foreign state while acting within the scope of his office or employment…”

Contrary to Kagan’s assertion, the law only specifies that the injury has to have occurred within the United States. Not a word about the wrongful act that leads to domestic injury also having to have taken place within the United. Kagan flat lied about the clear wording of a law that goes to the very heart of our ability to use the courts to combat Islamic terrorism, and thanks to the Court’s failure to review this crucial case, the simple wording and intent of Congress—that foreign states whose actions do injury in the United States can be sued for those injuries—has now been undone, as if the law had never been passed.

Oops!… I did it again”

Kagan proves that her lie was self conscious by also lying about the relevant Supreme Court precedent, claiming (again at p. 14):

In Amerada Hess the Court considered and rejected the argument that domestic effects of a foreign state’s conduct abroad satisfy the exception. 488 U.S. at 441.

In fact, the Court in Amerada never considered “the domestic effects of a foreign state’s conduct abroad” at all, for the simple reason that there were no domestic injuries in that case. The injuries occurred outside of U.S. territory, which is why the domestic tort exception was held not to apply. Here are the simple facts, as recounted in Justice Rehnquist’s majority opinion (joined by Brennan, White, Stevens, O’Connor, Scalia and Kennedy):

… the injury to respondents’ ship occurred on the high seas some 5,000 miles off the nearest shores of the United States. Despite these telling facts, respondents nonetheless claim that the tortious attack on the Hercules occurred “in the United States.” [At p. 440.]

The Amerada Company ship was attacked at sea. Since the tortious act and the damages from it both occurred “5,000 miles off the nearest shores,” the Court did not bother to distinguish between the wrongful act and the injuries from it. Kagan uses this to claim that the Court found Amerada’s domestic injuries to be unrecoverable, when in fact the Supremes agreed with the district court that there were no domestic injuries (p. 439-441).
(more…)

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

With Practice, Even You Can Administer Popular Posterior Vaccinations In Your Spare Time.

by Bunk X ( 251 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Health Care, Humor, Medicare, Open thread, Technology, Weapons at May 2nd, 2010 - 10:37 pm

Yep. That’s a simulated buttcheek for hypodermic needle training practice, and it tells you if you’ve done it right. That’s right, THIS HALF-ASS SPEAKS.

This strap-on simulator is a lifelike model of a right buttock with anatomical landmarks needed for injections. Correctly administered injections produce audiovisual feedback.

Just think how much fun this could be at frat parties, what with the anatomical landmarks and all… give a shot, take a shot. I hope they come up with a left-handed model. For now, let’s just hope for an Overnight Open Thread.

[Found here, via here, and  crossposted here.]

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Partisan Politics

by Bunk X ( 257 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Financial, Health Care, Healthcare, History, Liberal Fascism, Medicare, Open thread, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism, Tea Parties at April 11th, 2010 - 10:00 pm

Read into it as you see fit. Seems obvious to me.

The source of the graph along with some excellent commentary here. Might as well be an Open Thread, too.

[Crossposted here.]

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Obamacare Vote Open Thread

by Rodan ( 258 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Elections 2010, Health Care, Liberal Fascism, Medicare, Open thread, Progressives, Republican Party at March 21st, 2010 - 1:00 pm

This is an Open thread to discuss the House vote on Obamacare. It’s coming down to the wire and I will update this post as the news becomes available.

Discuss any topic here as well.



Update I: Rep. Bart Stupak has announced he will vote on the bill claiming he reached an agreement with Obama. This guarantees passage in the House.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Pics From Code Red Rally

by Mr. P ( 142 Comments › )
Filed under Free Speech, Guest Post, Healthcare, Medicare, Patriotism, Politics, Tea Parties at March 20th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

I spent this gorgeous Saturday afternoon in D.C. with 10s of thousands of other patriots at the “Code Red Rally.”

WASHINGTON – Tea Party activists fanned out across the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol Saturday, calling on lawmakers to vote down the health care bill which is expected to come up for a vote on Sunday.

“Kill the bill! Kill the bill! demonstrators chanted during the demonstration. Opponents of the health care bill that’s to be taken up in the House of Representatives later went inside the Capitol to urge lawmakers to vote against the legislation.

Among the thousands who attended the rally was actor Jon Voight, who praised all the people who came out on Saturday. Voight says the health care legislation will be “disastrous” if it goes through.

“This isn’t health reform — this is takeover,” said Dr. David Summers, a cardiologist from Frederick, Md., who attended the rally.

indeed.

Here are some of the photos taken by my girlfriend and myself:

(more…)
► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The U.S. Department of Homeland Suppository

by Bunk X ( 117 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Free Speech, Guest Post, Healthcare, Humor, Medicare, Open thread, Political Correctness, Socialism, Weapons at March 9th, 2010 - 10:00 pm

Never forget that these nice people were once sentient law-abiding citizens just like yourselves, prior to the insidious onslaught commonly referred to as El Rayo Estupido.

This is an open forum for Advanced Fuldkommen Gak and other miscellaneous topics of interest. The line forms to the rear.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Old Weird Howard: Don’t Pass Hellcare

by snork ( 112 Comments › )
Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Healthcare, Medicare, Politics, Progressives at March 5th, 2010 - 1:00 pm

It’s starting to crack. The monolithic support for ramming through socialized medicine with the nuke option is giving cold feet to none other than Howard “Scream” Dean.

Passing the healthcare proposals before Congress will “hang out to dry” every Democratic incumbent running for reelection this fall, Howard Dean said Thursday.

Dean, a physician by training who’s a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), said that Democrats in Congress — and President Barack Obama — would do themselves more harm than good by passing the current healthcare bill.

“The plan, as it comes from the Senate, hangs out every Democrat who’s running for office to dry — including the president, in 2012, because it makes him defend a plan that isn’t in effect essentially yet,” Dean said during an appearance on the liberal Bill Press Radio Show.

Ya think, Howard? So what’s up with Olosi? Are they such political nincompoops that they don’t even have the political horse sense that Howard “Scream” Dean seems to have?

I think the whole thing is over for now anyway. The reconciliation process (“nuke option”) requires that the house pass the exact bill passed in the senate. It looks like that’s not going to happen, because there are a dozen donkeys who voted for the original bill, but won’t vote for the senate version over the publicly funded abortion provisions.

So I guess it’s all over but the screaming. Take it away Howard…


Addition by Speranza:

At the Washington Examiner yesterday an Editorial compared Obama’s obsession with trying to ram Obamacare down our throats despite the public’s opposition to it, to Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg. “a horrendous, bloody carnage that could have been avoided, had not their commander, Gen. Robert E. Lee, been so determined to do it his way — a massed frontal assault against a nearly impregnable position.”

hat tip to Powerline

Just about everyone who was on that battlefield July 3, 1863 knew that 12,000 men were going to be sent to their doom due to the stubbornness of their commander, the same as just about everyone in this country knows that Obamacare will lead to a disaster as well. At least Lee was man enough to say after the disaster “It is all my fault” – words that are alien to Obama. Dr. K. yesterday said that he thinks 2010 might not be the complete disaster for the Dems as 2006 was for the GOP because 1. Obama is still popular and, 2. Americans felt lied to about the war. I disagree. 1. Obama might be personally popular (primarily because too many naive people invested so much in him) but his policies are not, 2. in addition to the wildly unpopular Obamacare, we still have massive unemployment to worry about, and 3. voters are waking up to the dangers of having one party rule when the POTUS is an ideologue. I expect a Republican tidal wave in November.

by Charles Krauthammer

So the yearlong production, set to close after Massachusetts’ devastatingly negative Jan. 19 review, saw the curtain raised one last time. Obamacare lives.

After 34 speeches, three sharp electoral rebukes (Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts) and a seven-hour seminar, the president announced Wednesday his determination to make one last push to pass his health care reform.

The final act was carefully choreographed. The rollout began a week earlier with a couple of shows of bipartisanship: a Feb. 25 Blair House “summit” with Republicans, followed five days later with a few concessions tossed the Republicans’ way.

Show is the operative noun. Among the few Republican suggestions President Obama pretended to incorporate was tort reform. What did he suggest to address the plague of defensive medicine that a Massachusetts Medical Society study showed leads to about 25 percent of doctor referrals, tests and procedures being done for no medical reason? A few ridiculously insignificant demonstration projects amounting to one-half of one-hundredth of 1 percent of the cost of Obama’s health care bill.

[...]

Obama has chosen differently, however. The time for debate is over, declared the nation’s seminar leader in chief. The man who vowed to undo Washington’s wicked ways has directed the Congress to ram Obamacare through, by one vote if necessary, under the parliamentary device of “budget reconciliation.” The man who ran as a post-partisan is determined to remake a sixth of the U.S. economy despite the absence of support from a single Republican in either house, the first time anything of this size and scope has been enacted by pure party-line vote.

Surprised? You can only be disillusioned if you were once illusioned.

Read the rest here: Why the Health Care Bill is a Failure

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Katie Couric: Return of the Palin Slayer

by Speranza ( 197 Comments › )
Filed under Medicare, Politics, Sarah Palin at February 15th, 2010 - 1:15 pm

I never understood and never will, the attraction that Katie Couric holds for so many people. First off the woman is 53 and is still called “Katie”?  Second – I personally am not into “perkiness”. Third, she is not very bright and belongs more with the Barbara Walters School of “Feelings” Journalism. In fact I expect her one day to be a regular on The View. When she asked Sarah Palin what newspapers she read I wish Sarah would have asked her what newspapers she herself reads. I never could understand why the alphabet networks go for the Couric’s and Diane Sawyer’s to host their evening news while a splendid newsman such as Brit Hume is shunted aside (another reason we should be grateful for having Fox News – they hired him to anchor “Special Report”).

by Stuart Schwartz

You know they’re worried.

Big government, big media, big Barack — they’re all worried. And they’ve brought in the knight in designer armor, the savior of all that is Washington and New York and Rodeo Drive, privileged and Democratic — Katie Couric.

Katie the Palin Slayer is back.

The CBS Evening News anchor is on the cover of Harper’s Bazaar this month, all progressive chic and mainstream media glitter. And just a week ago, she genuflected before Barack Obama to open the Super Bowl on CBS.

[...]

Neither her eighth cover for the glamor magazine nor the Super Bowl interview are meant to inform. Instead, in concert with the White House, Katie is hitting the “reset” button on a failing presidency. I’m-Katie-Couric-and-I’m-here-to-admire-you. Barack, Nancy, Harry, Rahm — don’t worry, got you covered.

They need Katie and her media platform. The Tea Party is gaining ground, The U.S. Congress and Obama job approval ratings are at historic lows, newspapers — long an arm of the Democratic Party — are failing at a record rate, and the networks — bastions of liberalism — are hemorrhaging viewers.

And — OMG!!! — Sarah Palin is back! Quick, hand me the wooden stakes and call Katie!  Katie Couric isn’t doing journalism; rather (or…Rather), she is 911 for the Obama agenda.  The natives are restless, and who better to call on than Katie the Palin Slayer?

And so Katie has again swung into action. Hail the “conquering Couric,” the Washington Post exults, “a power broker in stiletto heels.” Katie’s back, and as Robert Browning might have written had he been funded by a grant from the Obama administration, “the condom’s back on the banana — all’s right with the world.” (The original line read “God’s in his heaven”; this is Obama safe schools czar Browning, National Endowment for the Humanities poetry.)

Of course, she had no choice. You see, Katie hearts Barack. They are part of what New York Times columnist David Brooks proudly calls the “intellectual class,” a political and media elite that knows what’s best for the rest of us.

[...]

Read the rest: Katie Couric: Return of the Palin Slayer

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Senate passes Obamacare

by Rodan ( 177 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Healthcare, Medicare, Progressives at December 24th, 2009 - 10:00 am

In a 60-39 party line vote and against the will of the American people, The Progressive controlled Senate passed the Eugenics based Obamacare. This is a travesty as the whole bill is just a tax increase and the government will now take over our healthcare. With this power they will determine, who lives and dies.

WASHINGTON — The Senate passed a health insurance overhaul on Thursday morning, 60-39, as both Democrats and Republicans held unified in their positions on the massive bill that mandates coverage for about 9 percent of the U.S. population now without insurance.

All 58 Democrats and two independents supported the $871 billion, 10-year package that aims to cover about 30 million Americans. Thirty-nine of 40 Republicans rejected the bill. Kentucky Sen. Jim Bunning, who is retiring at the end of this Congress, did not vote.

Read the rest.

Make no mistake about this, this is a step towards Eugenics. They will determine who will be born via Abortions and who dies via the Death panels. This is a victory for the Progressive Movement and a realization of their goal of total control.

The Democrats have given us Americans a lump of coal by increasing the debt ceiling as well.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

AARP to Sell Out Seniors

by Rodan ( 173 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Medicare, Progressives at November 4th, 2009 - 4:19 pm

AARP which claims to represents American Senior Citizens is planning on throwing them under the bus. The AP is reporting that they are set to endorse Obamacare.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Officials are telling The Associated Press that AARP_the seniors’ lobby_will endorse the health care overhaul bill that House Democrats are preparing to take to the floor.

Officials with knowledge of the group’s decision told The Associate Press on Wednesday that the seniors lobby has decided to give the $1.2 trillion measure its seal of approval. An announcement is expected Thursday. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the announcement has not been made.

The endorsement, in advance of floor votes as early as this weekend, would be a major boost for President Barack Obama’s signature issue.

The Obama plan for Health Care will negatively effect seniors. Medicare will be slashed for “savings”. The question I have is that if there are saving in this program why not do it now? It is simple, this The Progressives hate the elderly. The Old represent our past and pass along memories to the young. The Totalitarians seek to create a new society by eliminating the Senior Citizens. They then will create their version of the past and mold their vision of the future.

The AARP is just an arm of the Progressive Movement. They don’t have the interests of Seniors at heart. Their support for Obamacare makes it plain for all to see.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Out of Control Medicare…

by savage ( 245 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Medicare at October 30th, 2009 - 12:47 pm

Guest Post from savages_girl

This is a story I saw on 60 Minutes last Sunday. I can’t believe this stuff…

Medicare Fraud: A $60 Billion Crime

Or more interesting to watch it here:

Steve Kroft in action

Did anybody else see this?

I can’t believe that bilking the government-run Medicare system would be bigger business in Miami than drug trafficking. Who’d have thought? I’m just astounded on the one hand and disgusted on the other.

Anybody have any thoughts to share on this?

SG

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon