Archive for the ‘LGF’ Category

The Omega Men of LGF

by snork ( 164 Comments › )
Filed under Humor, LGF, Open thread at March 19th, 2010 - 8:30 pm

Slate has an article on what it describes as “omega men” – several notches below beta, and why they are becoming so numerous. This is actually a new wrapper for a phenomenon that has been written about much in the past few years – men who are conforming to neither the traditional alpha role, or the new and improved feminist approved model, the beta. This is more-or-less independent of the metrosexual dimension; Rahm Emmanuel for example is an alpha metro.

They develop a taxonomy for omegas, and use a lot of TV actors as examples. But there are descriptions, as well. Here are some, and who at LGF they remind me of:

The Liberal Arts Layabout: Since he’s hanging out with successful artist types, Greenberg falls into this category, along with other Noah Baumbach characters (Jack Black in Margot at the Wedding, Chris Eigeman in Kicking and Screaming) and every role that Jason Schwartzman has ever played. They are usually failed artists of some sort, often surrounded by more successful friends and relatives. The bitter ones—Greenberg, Chris Eigeman—hide their inability to live up to the demands of the world with cynicism verging on cruelty. For example, after yelling, unprovoked, at his young lover Florence, Greenberg tells her that it’s partially her fault and that she should “take some responsibility for trying to see me.” The sweeter ones—Jason Schwartzman in Bored to Death—retreat to an elaborate fantasy world. In Bored to Death, Schwartzman plays Jonathan Ames, a writer whose career has stalled. He decides to become an amateur private eye after reading too many pulp novels and is mostly incompetent at his new fake job.

Example: the “failed artist” was a dead giveaway: This is the blogmeister himself, Mr. Johnson

The Mimbo: Unlike the liberal arts layabout, the mimbo revels in not participating in mainstream masculine culture. This character is very good-looking (hence the contraction—male bimbo) but doesn’t necessarily use his looks for personal gain. Mimbos of TV and film include Cougar Town’s Brian Van Holt, who plays the lead character’s hapless, underemployed golf-pro ex-husband, and Dax Shepard’s vain “male model” in When in Rome. Though Shepard’s character is obsessed with his own “shredded” physique, he can’t make it translate into gainful employment or public adulation: The photos in his modeling book were all done on spec, and when he takes his shirt off in a cafe, everyone hectors him to put it back on. Despite his lack of steady employment or fulfilling relationships, Van Holt’s Cougar Town character, Bobby Cobb, is so secure in his alternative masculinity that in a recent episode he was not even embarrassed when he was beaten up and robbed by a woman.

There are no good-looking men left at LGF. They all split and went to Blogmocracy. But this type does rather remind me of our POTUS, now doesn’t he?

Beer Guy: As Kerry Howley pointed out in an XX Factor post from earlier this year, beer guy appeared in many of the sexist ads that ran during the Super Bowl. There are two variations on this type: original beer guy and sad beer guy. Original beer guy is a mimbo gone to seed. He’s a happy couch potato, crashing a book club with his buddies from the softball league just to score some Bud Light. He is unbothered by his inability to live up to the masculine ideal—unlike sad beer guy, who is hyperaware of the fact that he is falling short. The middle-aged dudes on Men of a Certain Age—an unemployed actor, a man whose marriage fell apart because of his gambling addiction, and an unhappy car salesman—are sad beer guys. So are the miserable-looking men in the infamous Dodge Charger Super Bowl ad who appeared to be crushed by the responsibilities of their days, which didn’t just include working long hours but also dealing with the demands of their wives. As a New Jersey Star-Ledger review of Men of a Certain Age says of Ray Romano’s character in that show, “Joe is a man who misses his wife, cares about his kids, depends on his friends but also feels like he should be doing better with all of them, if he could only figure out how.”

Example: Cato

The Game Boy: The Apatovian stoners and the passive lads of Grandma’s Boy (whom Reihan Salam termed beta males in this Slate article from 2006) are exemplary game boys. These men live in a perpetually adolescent zone, ignoring adult responsibilities unless they are forced to consider them. If they’re employed, it’s playing video games (Grandma’s Boy) or creating a redundant Web site listing movie nude scenes (as in the Apatow flick Knocked Up). The newest entry in the game-boy posse is the star of She’s Out of My League, Apatow crony Jay Baruchel. In that movie, Baruchel plays a nebbishy TSA airport screener who somehow nabs a blond, hot event-planner with a law degree. Though Baruchel may get the girl at the end of the film, as EW reviewer Owen Gleiberman writes, “He’s a socially inept underachiever who works in airport security, and she’s a high-end event planner who oozes poise and would never be drawn to such a gawky, shambling loser.” Sounds like the writers are stuck in the same game-boy male dream-world that their characters inhabit.

Example: KKKilgore Trout

Or, nominate your own, and add to the types. Or whatever; this is an open thread.

The Un-Mata Hockeystick

by snork ( 167 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, LGF at March 8th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

This isn’t about Mann and his climatological hockeystick. Instead, this is about a not-too-well-hidden decline. At 1.0. Here are a few graphs from Quantcast.com:

The big spike at the right is the “why I flounced the right” post, that got him so much love from the left for…15 minutes. The rest of it’s pretty much downhill. Did something change?

And BTW, let me point out that that graph (unlike a lot of climate alarmist graphs) goes all the way to zero on the y-axis. If I wanted to be cheesy, I could have made it look a lot worse by cutting it off at, say, 6k.

Next, we have an interesting chart that shows how many people are frequent users.

Hmm. 3% of the visitors are responsible for 48% of the visits. Interestingly, that’s up from 1% when Sharmuta was still around. If you were looking to advertise on a site with these numbers, would you?

Other information that an advertiser might be interested in is demographics:

I’m not really sure how they arrive at this information, and a lot of it may be dated. 91% Caucasian; really diverse there. I’m also not sure if that’s by visits, or by visitors (makes a huge difference).

They need a third category besides male and female; I don’t think that they all fit into one or the other.

The final chart is what they call “affinity”. Not too long ago, this was filled with sites like AoS and Malkin And Hot Air. Now we get this:

The one thing in there that seems odd is ACS. I have no idea whatsoever why people who visit the ACS visit 1.0. The science and technology ones aren’t that hard to understand. Wired is a weird magazine that has a lot of whizbang stuff that appeals to the Nintendo crowd. It occasionally has some good stuff too, but that’s more the exception than the rule. New Scientist is also known as “nude socialist” (hat tip: Lubos Motl). They’re not a serious magazine either, though like Wired, they can occasionally have a good piece. ScienceDaily and livescience are both online services that are geared to the popular audience. Again, not to be taken seriously.

So the common pattern here seems to be a certain overlap with the PBS/NPR crowd, and a bunch of whizbang science for kiddies mags.

I think you all get the picture. Trekkies who think sciency stuff is cool, but don’t know a photon from a futon. Well into middle age. Like their leader.

Oh. And one final reason:

Patrick Trout? And what does that say when he needs to explain what a Glock is?

Oh, and BTW, why isn’t 1.0 doing a thread on this?

Rescued: The Lost Threads Of Wild Irish Rose

by ChenZhen ( 452 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Blogwars, Humor, LGF at March 5th, 2010 - 7:30 pm

OK, I’m not here to beat a dead horse. But I thought that with the relative significance of this rather ironic departure, it might be a good idea to mention that, in addition to the “goodbye“, the gal in question had completely scrubbed every one of those classic CJ worship threads from her blog.  This is such a shame, given the hours obviously invested on her part, and the countless more from us spent laughing and pointing.  But could they be lost….forever?

Not to fear, the google remembers everything (in no particular order):

Charles Johnson is right: on parting ways with the right

Money quote:

To the surprise of absolutely no-one, the usual mob of venomous frothing Johnson haters are out in force tonight, trying to downplay the post and discredit Johnson’s character on every venue that will allow them the bandwidth to do so, and on every blog post where the writer displays even a modicum of support for Mr. Johnson.

Charles Johnson is right: Kejda Gjermani takes on white supremacist Robert Stacy McCain

Charles Johnson is right: when right-wing smear merchants attack

Charles Johnson is right: Bruce Bawer slams fascist anti-jihad bloggers

Charles Johnson is right: exposing the haters… another violent threat from a rabid hatemonger

Charles Johnson is right: Mary Madigan gets it

Charles Johnson is right: Render gets it

Charles Johnson is right: defending the defensible

Charles Johnson is right: blogging with integrity, post 9/11

..and the crown jewel; this got the ultimate reward of a LGF main page entry (twitter redirect)…

Charles Johnson is right: why I stand in support of Charles Johnson and Little Green Footballs

…and the “oh my” quote:

Mr. Johnsons material is extremely well written, and thoroughly researched for accuracy before it ever posts on his mainpage. And if after posting he finds that he is in error, he is quick to post an immediate retraction.

This is called “journalistic integrity”… something that bloggers like the absurd, bikini-blogging Pamela Geller and the irresponsibly opportunistic Glenn Beck, will never have.

I’ve also come to understand the character of this man through his public comments, his refusal to tolerate arguementative, bigoted and violent comments from others on his website and his extraordinary personal commitment to diligent (and time-consuming) website moderation… something that is an extreme rarity in the blogosphere, among lazy bloggers who for the most part tend to post a disclaimer and hide behind it to avoid having to go back in and clean up the messes that they create.

Finally, I’ve come to understand over time who Charles Johnson is as a human being, not just a website administrator… and I like what I see.

I see a confident and dignified gentleman, a man who has clearly proven that he will not be intimidated or bullied into silence by anything or anyone… and I respect and admire that. I admire Mr. Johnson for his moral courage as well, his common sense, his strength of character, and his willingness to speak the truth – even if its’ unpopular, and comes with a price tag.

His tendency toward personal and professional restraint – even in the face of some of the most vile and defamatory abuse imaginable on websites like Atlas Shrugs, Jihad Watch, Brussels Journal, Gates of Vienna and a handful of smaller websites that exist solely to slander the mans’ reputation – is equally admirable.

Charles Johnson is a rarity in the oftentimes whorishly self-promotional world of politiblogging: a man who actually cares about the comments that are made on his website, doesn’t hesitate to give public credit to his ideological opponents where credit is due, and never goes out into the public square to toot his own horn.

But then, he really doesn’t need to… the quality of his work more than speaks for itself.

One has to wonder about the mindset of someone who would take the time to put up all that stuff in the first place, and wonder further about what dramatic development would prompt the same person to obliterate it all less than a year later.  (Any psychology buffs, feel free to chime in) A real heartbreaker, in any case.

Oh, and for a few more study material, go ahead and check out Irish Rose’s moment of glory in the old comment thread at 1.0.

The Jazz Artist crushes the Irish Rose

by Rodan ( 266 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Humor, LGF, Liberal Fascism, Open thread, Progressives at March 4th, 2010 - 8:48 pm

Radical Totalitarian Progressive Psychopath, Irish Rose, was one of the biggest defenders of a 1980’s Jazz Guitarist. She has been banned from his blog. This Section 8 Welfare Queen, who invented stories about people from Blogmocracy looking for her Trailer Park and about having an imaginary Swedish boyfriend, has been banned from The Obscure Mediocre 70’s/80’s Jazz Guitarist’s Groupie Blog. I really don’t feel sorry for her as she tried to have this blog shut down completely (it lasted an hour). Her and her buddy Defense Man, aka Honorary Yooper, went out  their way to defend their once beloved Jazz Artist. After getting nailed by yours truly and many other Netizens, they cowered into the back ground to lick their wounds.

Irish Rose then went on to make a new enemy, Ice Weasel. This fascist creature is now the most powerful blogger on the Groupie Blog other than the Jazz Musician himself. She even eclipsed fellow groupie Killgore Trout in power and influence. Irish Rose and Ice Weasel are both evil people and like Stalin/Hitler or Mao/Khrushchev or more recently Obama/Chavez, it was a matter of time before they fought. Well it has finally happened and just like in the case of Sharmuta, the Jazz Guy picked his new minion over someone who went out of their way to defend him.

Irish Rose went from being a Conservative to a Far Left Neo-Maoist to please Icarus. This was not enough, when the musician chooses a new Groupie, it’s apparently time for the old one to leave.

This is just another example of Leftists turning on each other!

Below is her goodbye post!

This is the overnight Open thread, enjoy!

(Hat Tip: Josephine)

Update: With the recent bannings of Irish Rose and Sharmuta leaving, it shows the low character of the low character of this Obscure and Mediocre 70’s/80’s Jazz Guitarist. He used two mentally disturbed people for his benefit. Being the Musician he is, once he became enamored of another groupie (Iceweasel), He kicked them to the curb. This shows the vile nature of Progressives.

The Cowardly Jazz Guitarist

by Rodan ( 251 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Blogwars, LGF at March 2nd, 2010 - 8:09 pm

It is often said that when people are bullied as youths they become abusive as adults. This could be the case of a certain obscure mediocre 80’s jazz guitarist. This musician, as we all know, is a blog bully. If you disagree or beat one of his pets in a debate he bans you. He then outs your identity and libels you as a Racist/Nazi/White Supremacist. Clearly this washed up jazz artist has mental issues and today we may have found out why!

He admits he avoided defending himself. This is the mark of a coward and someone who runs when confronted. This explains his paranoia that people are out looking for him. I hate to break it to him, but who would waste their time with a has been jazz guitarist that most people have never even heard of.

He was a coward as a youth and he is coward now. This is why he bullies people on his blog. It’s to make up for being a cowardly youth. He should have stuck to playing Jazz Guitar.

Enjoy the Overnight Open and feel free to discuss anything.

Update: Is it possible the Jazz Artist is really Max Headroom? They are both relics of the 1980’s are a figures of ridicule! I will let you all be the judge.

Max Headroom

The Jazz Guitarist!

Inside the Mind of Charles Johnson…

by savage ( 357 Comments › )
Filed under Humor, LGF, Open thread at February 26th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

I happened to have some spare time on my hands so I made a video for everyone to laugh their asses off. Good for a drinking thread.

Enjoy the evening!

Rap Artist claims Obama can save UK

by Rodan ( 168 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Blogwars, Humor, LGF, Music, Open thread, Progressives at February 23rd, 2010 - 7:00 pm

Rap Artist Jay-Z (I will admit I like much of his music), is just another ignorant musician. He claims that the UK needs an Obama to save them. I can’t figure why these musicians really act as if they are great thinkers. What is even worse is when their groupies actually take them serious.

However, he reckons neither GORDON BROWN nor DAVID CAMERON have the charisma of PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.

Jay-Z said: “Everyone needs new blood once in a while. And Britain needs it to shake up the country. People are calling it Broken Britain, so there’s obviously a problem.

“Someone needs to reinvigorate and galvanise the country and give it something to believe in. That means a leader with charisma to get the youth out to vote.

Read the rest.

Seriously, what does Jay Z know about Politics? He’s an ignorant uneducated man who is just talented in entertainment.

(more…)

Did the Jazz Guitarist write a Book?

by Rodan ( 128 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Humor, LGF, Open thread at February 21st, 2010 - 7:30 pm

This is an anonymous guest post. The Netizen who sent it requested  not to be named.

Did Chucky Johnson write a book? You decide.

Product Description

High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Little Green Footballs (LGF) is a political blog run by American web designer Charles Johnson. Media observers in the past have described the site as “right wing”, but since 2007 the site has dramatically changed emphasis, and is now better known for its criticism of creationists, leading conservative figures, and right-wing blogs. A later-day LGF focus is investigations of other bloggers and political commentators in the name of “anti-racism” and “anti-fascism”. Johnson once stated: I’m not pretending I’m giving equal time to both sides. But I do think what I’m advocating, and what I believe in, is the right side. Earlier, in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, Johnson – who describes himself as “pretty much center-left before 9/11″ transformed his blog’s discussion of bicycle racing, programming, web design, and the occasional humorous news item into a very active discussion of the War on Terror, Islam & Islamism, Eurabia and the Arab-Israeli conflict. LGF won the “Best Israel Advocacy Blog” award from the Jerusalem Post in 2005.

http://www.amazon.com/Little-Green-Footballs-September-programming/dp/613025928X

The above is the Editorial Review for Chuckie Johnson’s book which sells for $114.00.on Amazon.

That description is the same identical description of every single book published by Alphascript books.Not only that. Each book has the same identical editors:,John McBrewster Frederic P. Miller (Editor), Agnes F. Vandome (Editor) These people are well known. If you don’t believe it…just follow the links and see what others say.In other words, is Chucky Johnson really a prolific author? Key words Folks are High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles!

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/175137

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript_Publishing_sells_free_articles_as_expensive_books

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2YLTOH201KJ06

There is so much more.But this is plenty to see what has happened here.

Update: Avid Editor has an update to his guest post from last night concerning the radical Leftist Blog Little Green Football’s smearing of Glenn Beck.

Charles Johnson at LGF compares Glenn Beck giving the CPAC speech to Hitler

by Rodan ( 304 Comments › )
Filed under LGF, Leftists, Progressives at February 20th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Poster: Avid Editor


Beck gave a great speech tonight at CPAC. Watch it here if you missed it.

The once anti Jihadi now possible junkie. Said this

Wow. He really crossed that line? Wasn’t he offended by the LaRouche nuts signs at the Tea parties calling Obama Hitler?

Beck is a friend to Israel and the Jews. Like Beck or hate him he is for freedom and self reliance, while Hitler was about oppression and state power. To call him Hitler is offensive. Why is CJ trying to trivialize the singling out and genocide of more than 6 million Jews? Is he going to throw Israel under his bus soon like the whole Anti Jihadi movement?  In doing this CJ you are showing your anti-Semitism. Know wonder you drifted to the left.

CJ went on to post more insanities

Let me ask again. CJ what are you on?  Even though you hate me please go to rehab. You are making a total fool of yourself.

(Cross Posted @ Avid Editor’s Insights)

Rodan Note: Avid is correct, what the Obscure Mediocre Jazz Guitarist did by comparing Beck to Hitler is despicable and needs to be condemned.

Update: Below is Beck’s Speech.

Why take the political views of musicians seriously?

by Rodan ( 196 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Humor, LGF, Open thread at February 17th, 2010 - 7:30 pm

All of us here at Blogmocracy are refugees from another blog. That place at it’s heyday in 2004-2007. It was the place to meet interesting people. The owner of the blog, who is an obscure mediocre 70’s/80’s Jazz Guitarist, shifted his political opinions. Thinking the nation was moving Left, he decided to attack the Right. He began by banning those who he could not intimidate or beat in a debate. Then promoting Tranzi progressive talking points. Many including myself, did post after post attacking him. Discussions of this Jazz Artist consumed many threads. After thinking about it, I’m like what for?

Let’s look at another musician and his political opinions, rapper 50 Cents. In the clip below he is talking about the 2008 race between Hillary and Obama. He displays his ignorance of politics and attacks Bill O’Reilly.

If he started a political blog, would anyone take him serious? Absolutely not, he’s a rap artist. What does 50 know about the political attitudes of Americans that we don’t? He doesn’t and he’s not taken serious.

My question is if 50 Cents is not taken seriously, why take the Jazz Guitarist by the name of Charles “Icarus” Johnson serious?

Please explain to me why this Jazz Guitarist’s Opinions on Politics or Science are worth more than 50 Cents?

Rescued: Walter L. Newton’s essay for LGF

by ChenZhen ( 184 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Global Warming Hoax, LGF, Science at February 16th, 2010 - 6:30 pm

BLOGMOCRACY IN ACTION!

Here is Walter’s essay, in it’s entirety* (not in it’s entirety because walter would rather let the lgf crowd tear him down than anyone actually READ what he seemed to have worked so hard on):

Charles has given me permission to examine some of the programming code and data that has been used by Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University for their climate modeling. My information comes from material that was “hacked” from the CRU servers in Britain and released to the public. This material included program code, databases, private emails and documents. Charles indicated that I could use anything I deemed necessary to make my case.

re: #723 Charles
OK, then go ahead and post whatever you think makes your case. I seriously doubt that you’re going to be able to show an “inaccuracy,” which is what you claimed. And quibbling over quick and dirty methods used to parse a flat file is not the same thing as demonstrating that the code produced inaccurate results.

[snip]

re: #731 Charles
And for your part, you have to prove that a section of code actually produced inaccurate or mistaken results. Not simply that it could have done so. Because that’s what you claimed.

As Charles said “I seriously doubt that you’re going to be able to show an “inaccuracy,” Charles may be right. I wasn’t at CRU, I didn’t see the actual data from the time it was generated till the time it appeared in a report or paper (or disappeared), no more than Charles actually saw William Shakespeare pen any of his plays. In the same way Charles could use the historical records to prove Shakespeare did create all of those wonderful plays, I am going to use the historical record of the programmer who was responsible for maintaining, modifying and correcting the legacy programs at CRU who can
show us the inaccuracies he found. Meet Mr. Ian “Harry” Harris.
(end comment 1)

(more…)

Sorry, Husky Blogger

by m ( 408 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, LGF, Leftists, Progressives at February 15th, 2010 - 8:30 am

At Spitfire Murphy, LoppyD has some great links about the neurobiology professor (Amy Bishop) that went on a shooting rampage at the University of Alabama.

Sorry, Husky Blogger. The Nutty Professor Is A Far-Left Extremist

What’s this? A left-leaning, Harvard-educated professor lost her sh*t (for at least the second time) and went on a shooting rampage? But the Husky Blogger told me it’s always tea-bagging, racist, homophobic, right-wing extremists who commit such acts.

A family source said Bishop, a mother of four children – the youngest a third-grade boy – was a far-left political extremist who was “obsessed” with President Obama to the point of being off-putting.

I know the type.

There is an abundance. But I’m sure the husky blogger™ will be on the job exposing this BAD CRAZINESS!


Many thanks to Patricius for the image from this very fitting post.

Funny Parody Video

by Rodan ( 144 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Humor, LGF, Liberal Fascism, Open thread, Progressives at February 11th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

This video is too funny and I just had to post it. We need a laugh and break from the news.

This reflects the Elitist attitudes of Progressives. They impose standards on others and they don’t live up to. Since their Ideology is based on a lie, they are hypocrites in life. This is especially true of an Obscure Mediocre 80’s Jazz Guitarist. Why anyone takes a Musician’s opinions of Science and Politics seriously is beyond me. No one takes Barbra Streisand serious, why should this Jazz Artist be any different?

(Video hat Tip:drorfannkyl)

Update: Treat this as the Nightly Open Thread.

Groovy Blogger: Proud Mysogynist

by snork ( 319 Comments › )
Filed under LGF, Open thread, Progressives at February 9th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

This isn’t any news to anyone who has been paying attention, but just for the record, naked misogyny is proudly on display here:

Pamela Geller Shrieks on Joy Behar

Blogosphere | Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:10:19 am PST

Pamela Geller’s appearance last night on the Joy Behar show with Ron Reagan and Stephanie Miller perfectly demonstrates why Geller has become known on the Internet as the “shrieking harpy.”

Geller actually seems to think she came off well on this show, in which she tells Ron Reagan what his own father would have thought about Sarah Palin, and rants continuously like a howler monkey on crack for the whole segment. Notice that it ends as Joy Behar tells Geller, “You have not shut up.”

His defense will be, of course, that this was a debate that involved other women who weren’t being called harpies. That would be like Robert Byrd saying it was ok for him to use the “N” word, because he’s sitting next to Jesse Jackson. Non-sequitur. But notice, also, that his stated justification is that other extreme left-wing fanatics on the internet also do it, so that makes it ok.

This shouldn’t be surprising, given the classless way that this (these?) blogger(s?) also uses the homophobic term “teabagger” routinely. And as we all know, one of his favorite sockpuppets regulars has been caught planting n-bombs on other sites.

Memo to whomever is writing that blog: you don’t have to use such juvenile, bigoted, and offensive language, if you have an actual point to make. But if you don’t, shutting up will make less of an ass of yourself(ves?) than displaying your bigotry and childishness.

There. Somebody had to say it. This is an open thread.

Extra: It appears that the time has finally come when Islamist talking points are openly discussed there:

235 jamesfirecat Tue, Feb 9, 2010 12:12:49pm replyquote

re: #232 JeffM70
I simply don’t understand this obsession the far right has with Israel. It’s almost as if the United States has to subordinate its interests to those of Israel’s, at least in instances where there is a disagreement.

What I never got about Israel is if we were trying to make up for the horrors of the holocaust, why we didn’t just give them a part of Germany…

25 comments go by before someone responds lamely to this:

260 JeffM70 Tue, Feb 9, 2010 12:22:49pm

re: #235 jamesfirecat

They wanted their ancestral home land returned to them, and Germany was not it, so why would they want it?

Soon, Mearsheimer and Walt will be respected scientists there. Just watch.

Extra Extra: Speaking of misogynists at the BVoAF, it seems like their misogynist-in-chief is leaving the farm due to lack of internet:

43 Cato the Elder Tue, Feb 9, 2010 5:02:48pm

Just to let you all know, I will soon be losing my internet account for lack of funds. It’s been real, but don’t expect to hear from me in the foreseeable future.

Bubye, dick. Just because you were never able to get any doesn’t mean you should hate women whom you’ve never met.

Spin on Overdrive

by snork ( 47 Comments › )
Filed under LGF, Media at February 5th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

Sorry, I said I wouldn’t do any more Nancy posts, but this is so precious, I’ll just quote the centrifuge in it’s entirety, and leave it at that:

O’Keefe ‘Race and Conservatism’ Updates

Politics | Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:34:48 am PST

Andrew Breitbart has turned his “Big Journalism” website into an amazingly lengthy tirade demanding “retractions” from practically every media organization in America, for writing about the Max Blumenthal-One People’s Project report that claimed ACORN sting filmmaker James O’Keefe was photographed at a “white supremacist forum” in 2006.

There have been some developments in the story; David Weigel of the Washington Independent, who was at the same event as a reporter, walked back his first statement that he could “confirm all the details” about the story, and has posted an update here explaining which details he could not confirm: Clarification — and Mea Culpa — on James O’Keefe and ‘Race and Conservatism’.

Among some less important points, there are three key details from the Blumenthal-One People’s Project story Weigel now says he does not confirm: 1) that O’Keefe was manning a table of racist literature; 2) that the event was a white nationalist conference (Weigel now describes it as a debate); and 3) that O’Keefe was an organizer of the event (he wasn’t).

(Note that the veracity of the first claim, that O’Keefe was manning a table with literature from white nationalist groups, has not been decided either way. O’Keefe says it isn’t true, but One People’s Project hasn’t retracted it. More on this below.)

In the interest of accuracy, I need to respond to one point Weigel makes in this post about the story: Conservative Media Mogul Plays Defense on Racism Story.

The article trafficked around the web at a moderate pace. Because I attended the event, I wrote about it, and the Blumenthal story, here. Soon, other websites grabbed onto the story and added unsupportable spin. Little Green Footballs, whose editor Charles Johnson has made a splashy departure from the right, linked to the revelation about what he called a “white nationalist conference.”

That’s not an accurate description of what I wrote, and saying I “called” the event a white nationalist conference is not true. Here are my exact words:

According to a group called “One People’s Project,” ACORN sting filmmaker James O’Keefe was photographed attending a 2006 white nationalist conference titled “Race and Conservatism.”

It’s very clear that I attributed the “white nationalist conference” claim to One People’s Project; that’s what the words “according to” mean. And that’s exactly what the claim is at the One People’s Project page that started all this: HEY JAMES O’KEEFE, ABOUT THAT WHITE RACIST FORUM YOU ATTENDED IN 2006…

Interesting what could have been – or not have been – had we caught this four years ago. Back then, there was this white supremacist forum that we had called attention to and eventually attended…

So I do not agree with Weigel that I added an “unsupportable spin” to the story. I correctly attributed and reported the statement.

More importantly, it’s now incumbent on One People’s Project to put up the goods if they have them. They should release an uncropped version of the picture they said shows O’Keefe manning a table of racist literature, or they should retract that claim because they can’t prove it.

I’ll add one more thing: Heh™.

Extra: Pam Geller smacks down he who fights with girls. You go, girl!

Extra Extra: It appears that he who fights with girls doesn’t get quitting when you’re behind. As of 17:30 PST, he’s got two, count them, two additional threads about why O’Keefe really is a white supremacist/I didn’t really say that/Breitbart is on a rampage/this is a nontroversy/hey look over there!