Archive for the ‘Multiculturalism’ Category

Europe Died in Auschwitz

by Eliana ( 124 Comments › )
Filed under Europe, Holocaust, Islamists, Judaism, Multiculturalism at March 11th, 2010 - 8:00 am

by Sebastian Villar Rodriguez
Spanish journalist – Front Page Magazine
September, 2005

I was walking along Raval (Barcelona) when all of a sudden I understood that Europe died with Auschwitz.

We assassinated 6 million Jews in order to end up bringing in 20 million Muslims!

We burnt in Auschwitz the culture, intelligence and power to create.

We burnt the people of the world, the one who is proclaimed the chosen people of God.

Because it is the people who gave to humanity the symbolic figures who were capable of changing history (Christ, Marx, Einstein, Freud…) and who is the origin of progress and wellbeing.

We must admit that Europe, by relaxing its borders and giving in under the pretext of tolerance to the values of a fallacious cultural relativism, opened it’s doors to 20 million Muslims, often illiterates and fanatics that we could meet, at best, in places such as Raval, the poorest of the nations and of the ghettos, and who are preparing the worst, such as the 9/11 and the Madrid bombing and who are lodged in apartment blocs provided by the social welfare.

We also have exchanged culture with fanaticism, the capacity to create with the will to destroy, the wisdom with the superstition.

We have exchanged the transcendental instinct of the Jews, who even under the worst possible conditions have always looked for a better peaceful world, for the suicide bomber. We have exchanged the pride of life for the fanatic obsession of death. Our death and that of our children.

What a grave mistake that we made!!!

Europe died in Auschwitz
Sebastian Villar Rodriguez, a Spanish journalist, Front Page Mag

Geert Wilder’s Speech to The House of Lords

by Rodan ( 162 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Elections, Elections 2010, Europe, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives at March 5th, 2010 - 5:00 pm

Dutch Anti-Colonialist resistance leader, Geert Wilders, made a speech to the House of Lords in Britain today. He presented his movie Fitna which shows what Islamic Imperialism is all about. Our EDL friends marched in support of Geert Wilders and to counter the Leftist-Islamic Axis. His party made gains in the Dutch Municipal elections and is posed to do well in the June Parliamentary Elections. Geert is at the forefront of European resistance to Islamic Colonization.

Below is his speech to the House of Lords.

Thank you. It is great to be back in London. And it is great that this time, I got to see more of this wonderful city than just the detention centre at Heathrow Airport.

Today I stand before you, in this extraordinary place. Indeed, this is a sacred place. This is, as Malcolm always says, the mother of all Parliaments, I am deeply humbled to have the opportunity to speak before you.

Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for your invitation and showing my film ‘Fitna’. Thank you my friends for inviting me.

I first have great news. Last Wednesday city council elections were held in the Netherlands. And for the first time my party, the Freedom Party, took part in these local elections. We participated in two cities. In Almere, one of the largest Dutch cities. And in The Hague, the third largest city; home of the government, the parliament and the queen. And, we did great! In one fell swoop my party became the largest party in Almere and the second largest party in The Hague. Great news for the Freedom Party and even better news for the people of these two beautiful cities.

And I have more good news. Two weeks ago the Dutch government collapsed. In June we will have parliamentary elections. And the future for the Freedom Party looks great. According to some polls we will become the largest party in the Netherlands. I want to be modest, but who knows, I might even be Prime Minister in a few months time!

Read it here: Speech House of Lords, London, Friday the 5th of March 2010

Here is my favorite part:

If I may quote one of my favourite American presidents: Ronald Reagan once said: “We need to act today, to preserve tomorrow”.

Geert Wilders is no Fascist, He’s a Reagan Conservative!

(Hat Tip: Delectable)

Progressives Continue to Push away American allies

by Rodan ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under American Supremacy, Barack Obama, Multiculturalism, Progressives, Tranzis at March 4th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

The foreign policy of Barack Hussein Obama is 3rd World Liberation based. Whether it’s allies like Israel, the UK or Colombia he continues to ignore their interests to please our enemies. His appeasement of Dar AL Islam has resulted in nothing. The Progressives in Congress continue to hold up the Colombia Free Trade Agreement to please Hugo Chavez. Now is he backing Argentina against our British allies over the Falklands. He is destroying a century of friendships all for the sake of his radical Transnationalist Ideolgy.

Almost 30 years after losing a war over the Falkland Islands, Argentinais once again warning Britain that it still wants back what it calls the Malvinas.

Argentina is now angry over a British company’s oil exploration off the windswept islands in what it considers its own South Atlantic backyard.

Although nominally democratic, the unpopular Kirchner government in Buenos Aires has claimed that the sparsely settled islands are a symbolic matter of Spanish-speaking pride throughout Latin America – and is theirs because the islands once belonged to Spain in the 19th century.

Read the rest: No Allies — But Plenty of Enemies

Victor Davis Hanson, being the historian he is, grasps the enormity of what Barack Hussein Obama is doing. Our President was influencedby 3rd World Liberation Ideology in his youth. His backstabbing of traditional American allies is a strategic disaster. He is not turning our enemies into friends, but isolating the US. At this rate, we will lose allies and have only enemies.

Clearly, Barack Hussein Obama is fulfilling the 3rd World Liberation goals of a weakened America. I don’t think his foreign policy is an accident, but based on designed.

America, the last man standing

by m ( 183 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Free Speech, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Sharia (Islamic Law) at March 2nd, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Blond bombshell Geert Wilders returns to Britain, looking for a fight

Boyish, topped with a bouffant mane of bleached blond hair, cheerful and cherubic, Geert Wilders is the unlikely new face of the far Right in Europe. But appearances are deceptive. The leader of the Dutch anti-immigration Freedom Party has emerged as one of the most divisive politicians in Europe, the purveyor of a virulent brand of anti-Islamic rhetoric that calls for a tax on Islamic headscarves and a ban on the Koran, which he likens to Mein Kampf.

Well, there are many similarities.

The whole article gives the dhimmified editorial vibe. The last sentence sums up this “fight”.

Some polls suggest that after the June elections Mr Wilders may lead the biggest single parliamentary party, raising the prospect that a former fringe provincial politician with extreme views and peculiar hair could end up leading the country. “At some point it’s going to happen and then it will be a big honour to fulfil the post of prime minister,” he says. If that comes to pass it will mark both the triumph of a new, more subtle brand of right-wing politics in Europe, and the final demise of the stereotyped image of the Netherlands as a nation of bland liberal views and easygoing tolerance.

They must tolerate the intolerance of Islam or else people may call them intolerant. Got it?

A nice little reminder via Israpundit:

ISLAMAPHOBES UNITE!

Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands , at the Four Seasons, New York, Oct ‘08, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem .

Read it. Remember it. Pass it around.

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe . This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe .

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe . Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.

[...]

Please take the time to read and understand what is written here. Please send it to every free person that you know, it is so very important.

Also, US4Israel asks that you please write to Israel’s Prime Minister bnetanyahu@knesset.gov.il; and tell him you will stand by him if he firmly rejects the periodic initiatives to set up yet another Islamic state — this one situated so close to Tel-Aviv that it will endanger the only Jewish state in the world.

Read the whole thing (there will definitely be a test): Wilders: “America, the last man standing”

Rodan Update: Below is a a video from our EDL friends in support of Geert Wilders!

Backing the burka ban

by m ( 135 Comments › )
Filed under Europe, Islamic Invasion, Multiculturalism, Politics, Sharia (Islamic Law) at March 2nd, 2010 - 1:30 pm

It seems the majority of people in Europe have spoken. I wonder if their governments will listen (probably as well as ours). Personally, I see it as a public safety issue. Unidentifiable blobs walking around do not give a perception of safety, or equality.

via Drudge:

Five European states back burka ban

More than half of voters in four other major European states back a push by France’s Nicolas Sarkozy to ban women from wearing the burka, according to an opinion poll for the Financial Times.

As Mr Sarkozy presses ahead with plans to ban the wearing of the burka in public places, the FT’s latest Harris poll shows the move is not just strongly supported in France, but wins enthusiastic backing in the UK, Italy, Spain and Germany.

The poll shows some 70 per cent of respondents in France said they supported plans to forbid the wearing of the garment which covers the female body from head to toe. There was similar sentiment in Spain and Italy, where 65 per cent and 63 per cent respectively favoured a ban.

Of course, they have to throw up an apples to oranges equivalency:

Asked if they would support the burka ban if it were accompanied by a clampdown on wearing all religious icons such as the Christian crucifix and the Jewish cappel, only 22 per cent of French people said they supported such a move. In Britain, just 9 per cent of people said they would back such a move.

No they didn’t try to equate the full body covering of a burka that hides a person’s identity with a crucifix or covering the head/hair (I believe that’s what they are talking about)? It is a shame that 22% would be ok with that in France.

(thank you to Rodan for the link tip)

Muammar Gaddafi calls for jihad on Swiss after ban on building minarets

by Speranza ( 153 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Islamic hypocrisy, Libya, Multiculturalism at February 26th, 2010 - 5:00 am

Well get back to us when we can build churches in Libya, Muammar. The arrogance of these people knows no boundaries.  They make demands and then threats, demands and threats one after the other  – all the while we keep on giving up our freedoms bit by bit.

by Roger Boyes

Muammar Gaddafi has appealed for jihad against Switzerland, long regarded as one of the most peaceful nations in the world.

The Libyan leader’s call for a holy war was, he said, a response to a Swiss referendum in November to ban the construction of minarets on mosques.

It is the low point in a relationship that has been deteriorating since 2008 when Colonel Gaddafi’s son Hannibal was briefly detained in Geneva after allegedly beating his servants.

“Any Muslim in any part of the world who works with Switzerland is an apostate, is against (the Prophet) Muhammad, God and the Koran,” Colonel Gaddafi said at a rally broadcast on television.

He made the speech to mark the Prophet’s birthday, ensuring that many Arabs would take the call seriously.

It was not clear how he wanted Muslims to target Switzerland. “The masses of Muslims must go to all airports in the Islamic world and prevent any Swiss plane landing, to all harbours and prevent any Swiss ships docking,” he said, apparently unaware that Switzerland does not have a merchant navy, or coast.

He has been attempting to demonstrate to the West that he is not at the helm of a rogue state, that it has no nuclear ambitions or contacts with terrorism. He criticised al-Qaeda during his address, calling it a “a psychological disease”. He added: “There is a big difference between terrorism and jihad.”

He made clear that Switzerland, “an infidel, obscene state which is destroying mosques”, was at the very least an ideological enemy.

Read the rest here: Muammar Gaddafi calls for jihad on Swiss after ban on building minarets

Progressive Politician wants to keep Geert Wilders out of Government

by Rodan ( 35 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Geert Wilders, Multiculturalism, Politics at February 24th, 2010 - 7:00 am

Good morning Blogmocracy Netizens! I hope everyone slept well! It’s a new day and I hope it’s good for all.

Conservative anti-Imperial colonizer, Geert Wilders and his party might come in 1st place in the upcoming Dutch elections. Normally he would be asked to form a government or if he comes in 2nd, offered cabinet positions. Not in this case. A Politicain from the Progressive Labour party has said that no party should form a coalition with Wilders’s  Anti-Jihadist Freedom Party.

AMSTERDAM, Feb 23 (Reuters) – A Dutch Labour politician’s call to keep far-right leader Geert Wilders out of a new government has stirred anger among other parties who consider the move undemocratic and likely to drive voters towards him.

Wilders and his Freedom Party have been a focus of debate since the Dutch cabinet collapsed on Saturday, as the election which could be held as early as May will be a key opportunity for the anti-immigration group to increase its influence after a stunning success at European elections last year.

Read the rest: Dutch parties tussle over approach to far right

Geert Wilders wants to preserve the Dutch way of life and prevent it from being choked with islamic immigration. The Left is allied with islamic interest and is opposed to his goals. Expect the attacks to increase on Wilders becasue if he wins, it will send shock waves through the world.

The Dutch want Freedom, not enslavement at the hands of Islamo-Imperialists.

Multiculturalism Strikes again!

by Rodan ( 153 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness at February 19th, 2010 - 8:30 am

This is what tolerance and multiculturalism leads to. Even our Military has been infected and the enemy is taking advantage. I will let the Netizens comment on this. This gets me too angry to discuss rationally.

CBN News has learned exclusively that five Muslim soldiers at Fort Jackson in South Carolina were arrested just before Christmas. It is unclear whether the men are still in custody. The five were part of the Arabic Translation program at the base.

The men are suspected of trying to poison the food supply at Fort Jackson.

Read the rest.

Comment away guys, I’ll discuss it in the thread.

Latino is a Racist term Saturday Open Thread

by Rodan ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Multiculturalism, Open thread, Political Correctness, Progressives at February 13th, 2010 - 9:39 am

The term Latino used by treacherous self hating Hispanic Progressive Organizations is a Racist term. The word Latino is the Spanish/Italian pronunciation of the word Latin. So called Hispanic civil rights groups use this term to describe the community. However, by doing so they are accepting inferiority status. By using the Latin term instead of it’s English version they are saying that Hispanics can’t speak English. An example of this would be German Americans calling themselves Deutsche American. In essence they have accepted White Progressive racist attitudes about Hispanics, that they we are too dumb to learn English.

The term Latino is also used wrong big time. Latino means Latin. The term Latin goes beyond Spanish Speakers. Italians (The Original Latins), Portuguese speakers, French, Romanians and Filipinos are all Latin peoples. Just as there is a Latin America, there’s also a Latin Europe . In Fact Latin America is just a cultural extension of Southern Europe. The term Latin is like saying Semite or Germanic, it can include many related cultural and linguistic groups. The three greatest Latin powers were The Roman Empire, Spanish Empire and Napoleonic France. Napoleon was Corsican, so he was really Italian. He rightfully viewed himself as an heir to the Romans.

So these so called Latino leaders are self hating and exclude our cousins. In short, the term Latin is not the same as saying Hispanic. Spanish people are a subgroup of Latins. Hence not all Latins are Hispanic.

This is another example of Progressive racism and how they twist terms for political purposes. In short, I’m proud of being a Hispanic-Italian Latin. I’ll say Latino, Cuando hablo Espanol!

Update: Below is a statue in Rome of the She wolf God sent to take care of Romulus and Remus. The Twins founded Rome and the Latin Culture.

Treat this as a Saturday Open Thread. Link to stories and discuss any topic.

English Defence League – Scales of Justice

by savage ( 157 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamists, Jihad, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Terrorism, UK at February 11th, 2010 - 4:30 am

Good morning everyone. I thought I would post this video from a comment on a previous thread. It’s very good and worth discussing.

The hat tip goes out to The Osprey, and it was originally posted at Lionheart’s site, you know, that insane racist according to the ponytail.

Chimpanzees Loose at UC Irvine

by snork ( 99 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Free Speech, Hate Speech, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism at February 10th, 2010 - 3:30 pm

You have to see this to believe it. The Ambassador from Israel, Michael Oren, attempts to speak at the invitation of students there. Then the apes start screeching.


No comment is necessary.

Et tu, ‘Tarjay’?

by m ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Religion at February 4th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

On sale exclusively at Target is this innocent-looking toy globe. Thousands of these trinkets have already moved out of malls, from Queens to Honolulu, and landed in living rooms and kids’ rooms across America.

But folks who forked over a buck for the miniature worlds got less than they bargained for.

These planetary models contain just about all the countries on Earth — from France to China, Singapore to Spain. But there’s one glaring exception:

Israel.

In the spot where Israel should be, this word is printed: “Palestine.” Some of those who unwittingly purchased the Israel-free orbs feel as if they’ve played a role in a modern-day Final Solution.

[...]

“We didn’t want to offend any of our guests,” said Amy Reilly of Target customer relations, who initially said the omission of Israel was due to lack of space on the item. (Isn’t “Palestine” a longer word?)

Read the rest.

(thanks to Speranza for the tip)

I am glad that they are trying to “correct” the situation, but it never should have happened in the first place. Apparently it wasn’t an oversight or they would not have had the excuses handy. But at least they did respond this time – not as much luck with the “islam is the light” dolls.

Amy Reilly of Target’s Media Relations office called Lee and directed parents “To talk to Mattel if you have any issues with the doll.” Reilly carefully stated, “We have not had a national recall on those dolls.” When told of parents concerns about the doll Reilly stated, “The doll is a well selling doll.” She said, for anything else “I would continue to try reaching Mattel.”


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Chaplaingate

by snork ( 62 Comments › )
Filed under Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Religion at February 4th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Here’s an interesting situation. At Vanderbilt University there’s a Muslim Chaplain. Unlike Christian and Jewish chaplains there, he is rather adamant that gays must be executed.

The author, a Vanderbilt Divinity grad, observes:

I absolutely guarantee that the university would fire a Christian chaplain who denounced homosexuality as merely abominable. However, execution of homosexuals is a fact in Islamist countries, especially Iran.

But in this case, we have a Chaplain who:

publicly acknowledged what those of us who study shariah Islamic law know…, when pressed on whether or not shariah Islamic law requires the death penalty for homosexuals, asserted that yes, it does. Furthermore, he stated: “I don’t have a choice as a Muslim to accept or reject teachings.”

Two gay teenagers about to be hanged in Iran

Well. What does Vanderbilt have to say for themselves?

There has been some confusion as to Binhazim’s role at Vanderbilt. He is the Muslim chaplain at Vanderbilt, a volunteer position. He is not a professor of Islam and is not associated with Vanderbilt University Divinity School. He has adjunct associate professor status at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in pathology. This position, which carries no teaching or research responsibilities, is also unpaid.

According to Vanderbilt’s website, he’s an “affiliated chaplain”. Whether he is in the Divinity school is irrelevant. He’s still there representing and teaching Islam. So, it’s about the money? If you don’t pay him, he’s allowed to be on your staff spouting not only homophobia, but death to gays? If he’s not getting paid by the university, how does he support himself? The piece doesn’t say, but I know what I’d put my money on.

And it gets worse. He’s a speaker, with the credibility of being a Vanderbilt Divinity professor (yes, I know he’s adjunct, but to the outside world, he’s a professor). And in that role, he spoke at a forum put on by the DoD on Islam in the military.

The whole forum lasted about 80 minutes. The co-speaker, Army Reserve Capt. Cox, is a Muslim convert. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, testified to Congress this week that the Defense Dept.’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy should be revoked and that gays should be allowed to serve openly. A good question for Capt. Cox would be, “As a Muslim officer, do you accept Islam’s doctrine that homosexuality is an abomination?” There is no possible answer for him but yes, since textual literalism is a basic tenet of Islam. Then, “If you were directed by your superior commanders to participate in and publicly support a gay rights event, similar to such events already held by the military for ethnic minorities, would you comply?”

It’s a hypothetical question, but it seems to me that when he says:

“I don’t have a choice as a Muslim to accept or reject teachings.”

He’s implicitly agreeing that Muslims in the military have an obligation first to Islam, and then second to the military. In other words, he’s providing religious cover for terrorists in the military including Hasan.

Lovely.


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Female Suicide Bombers…

by coldwarrior ( 153 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Terrorism, Multiculturalism, Terrorism at February 2nd, 2010 - 10:00 am

This background was taken from wiki, it is accurate and is a good place to start this post.

Sunni Muslims, often referred to as Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamā‘h or Ahl as-Sunnah, are the largest denomination of Islam.

The word Sunni comes from the word sunnah, which means the teachings and actions or examples of the Islamic prophet, Muhammad. Therefore, the term “Sunni” refers to those who follow or maintain the sunnah of the prophet Muhammad. Another etymology proposed by some[who?] is that the word “sunni” comes from a movement “Am-ul-sunnah” started by Mu’awiya.

The Sunni believe that Muhammad did not specifically appoint a successor to lead the Muslim ummah (community) before his death, and after an initial period of confusion, a group of his most prominent companions gathered and elected Abu Bakr Siddique—Muhammad’s close friend and a father-in-law—as the first caliph of Islam. Sunni Muslims regard the first four caliphs—Abu Bakr, `Umar ibn al-Khattāb, Uthman Ibn Affan and Ali ibn Abu Talib—as “al-Khulafā’ur-Rāshidūn” or “The Rightly Guided Caliphs.” Sunnis also believe that the position of caliph may be democratically-chosen, but after the Rashidun, the position turned into a hereditary dynastic rule. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1923, there has never been another as widely-recognized caliph in the Muslim world.

Shia Islam (Arabic: شيعة‎ Shī‘ah, sometimes Shi’a or Shi’ite), is the second-largest denomination of Islam. Shia Muslims—though a minority in the Muslim world—constitute the majority of the populations in Azerbaijan, Bahrain and Iran, as well as a plurality in Iraq, Kuwait, and Lebanon.

In addition to believing in the authority of the Qur’an and teachings of the Muhammad, Shia believe that his family—the Ahl al-Bayt (the People of the House), including his descendants known as Imams—have special spiritual and political rule over the community[3] and believe that Ali ibn Abi Talib, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law, was the first of these Imams and was the rightful successor to Muhammad, and thus reject the legitimacy of the first three Rashidun caliphs.[4]

The use of a female suicide bomber in Iraq by the Sunni against the majority Shia (backed by Iran) during a high religious pilgrimage is not unique, the press is covering this as if this was the first time a female suicide bomber has been used. Females have been used over the past 20 years, the first was in Lebanon by secular members of the Syrian Socialist Nationalist Party in Southern Lebanon. It is impossible to pretend that Hezbollah had nothing to do with this given their operational control over that area in the 1980’s. They have occurred also in India, the Tamil Tigers used female suicide bombers to murder Prime Minister Ghandi. They have been used in Chechnya, Turkey (by the PPK), in Israel by the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, and by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s al Qaeda in Iraq. I do see a pattern here, the Iranian funding and training of these groups; that makes this aspect of suicide bombing primarily a Shia operation.

The advantages of using females is that they do not fit into the terrorist ‘profile’ and are often overlooked by security professionals. Modesty is also a factor, women are not searched, or even looked at in Muslim countries as thoroughly as men; women are often allowed to pass freely through the checkpoints. Combine this with a hajib, burqa, and the niqab and what you have is a concealed, invisible smart bomb.  ABC reported “last week alleged that American law-enforcement officials have been told to be on the lookout for female suicide bombers who may attempt to enter the United States. The network quoted one official saying that at least two such women are believed to be connected to Al Qaeda in Yemen and may have a non-Arab appearance and be traveling on Western passports.” The terrorists will never stop, they will continue to find ways to attack us.  Be prepared, In my opinion the next attack will have nothing to do with airplanes. All of the airport/airplane probes are a ruse to keep our attention away from other, now much easier to hit, targets. We can’t watch all of the malls, restaurants, schools, or other soft targets.

If women are used more frequently this means that the masculine chauvinistic Muslim ideals of jihad, martyrdom, and free pass to paradise and its rewards is not holding in the face of increased anti-terrorism efforts and more aggressive searches and profiles. The next step for the terrorists is that once the women are searched and countered, children will be used as suicide bombers next.


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Petition in Indonesia to remove Obama Statue

by Rodan ( 120 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism at January 26th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

Barack Hussein Obama bragged about his childhood in Indonesia. He claimed this experience in a mostly Islamic country ,would allow him to outreach to them. That outreach has failed and even in his beloved adopted homeland, they reject him. There is a Statue to a Boy Obama near the school he went too. Well there is movement that wants to remove it.

JAKARTA — Indonesian authorities said Monday they are considering a petition to tear down a statue of US President Barack Obama as a boy, only a month after the bronze was unveiled in Jakarta.

The statue of “Little Barry” — as Obama was known when he lived in the capital in the late 1960s — stands in central Jakarta’s Menteng Park, a short walk from the US president’s former elementary school.

Critics say the site should have been used to honour an Indonesian and 55,000 people have joined a page on social networking website Facebook calling for the statue to be removed.

Read the rest.

Indonesians want nothing to do with this guy. He is a Totalitarian Radical Progressive, who heading for a big downfall. They don’t want to be associated with him when he fails. Can you honestly blame the Indonesians?