► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘Leftist-Islamic Alliance’ Category

Why Did NSA Surveillance Fail To Stop Nidal Hasan? Because MUSLIMS are exempt from scrutiny!

by 1389AD ( 94 Comments › )
Filed under government, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness at June 17th, 2013 - 9:25 am

Blame political correct multiculturalism – and the Muslim Brotherhood moles who have thoroughly infested the federal government. NSA dragnet surveillance wouldn’t have stopped 9-11-01 either. Before the attack, clues were abundant and readily available, but nobody acted upon them. Remember the “failure to connect the dots”?

On YouTube:

Published on Jun 14, 2013 by yazchat
Fort Hood attacker had online terror ties.
Fox News: America’s Newsroom
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas-newsroom/index.html
Fox News Insider: The Official Live Blog of Fox News Channel
http://foxnewsinsider.com/
Fox News Live Wall Chat
http://foxnewsinsider.com/live-wall/
Fox News Tweets
https://twitter.com/FoxNews
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/

Former Bush speechwriter fawns over Samantha Power

by Speranza ( 188 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Sudan and South Sudan, Syria, United Nations at June 12th, 2013 - 11:00 am

Doing his best John McCain/Lindsey Graham imitation – Michael Gerson hearts Samantha Power.  Gerson never mentions her remarks calling Israelis “bastards” or her suggestion that we take money away from the “Israeli military” and give it to “Palestine”  Just another reason for me to hope that we never, ever have another Bush or Bush crony in the White House.

by Michael Gerson

President Obama’s newly designated national security adviser, Susan Rice, and his proposed United Nations ambassador, Samantha Power, are political loyalists. They are also known as liberal interventionists — emotionally seared by U.S. passivity during the Rwandan genocide of 1994 and advocates for military action to prevent a Libyan bloodbath in 2011. So the question arises in Washington and foreign capitals (say, Moscow, Tehran and Damascus): Is the president repaying his debts or making a foreign policy statement?

To Rice, a debt is clearly owed. Following the Benghazi attack, she was sent into talk-show battle with distorted guidance, leaving her both guiltless (in this matter) and unconfirmable as secretary of state. A White House staffer, however, serves at the president’s pleasure — and Rice has earned his confidence.

Power is only beginning to earn her elevation. She does not have a résumé that allows for a quiet, anonymous Senate confirmation. As an ­anti-­genocide activist and writer, she has made a career of inflicting discomfort on public officials. Congress may enjoy the turnabout. Power has been an opinionated, occasionally intemperate, journalist and academic who has left a long paper trail on controversial topics.

She is also a superb choice.

I first got to know Power in her role as a thorn in the side. Having criticized President Bill Clinton for dithering on ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, she had taken to criticizing President George W. Bush for dithering on atrocities in Darfur. (I presume she discovered, serving in Obama’s National Security Council, the powerful institutional bias in favor of dithering on issues such as atrocities in Syria.) [.........]

Meeting her, I found something else. This was intemperance in the best of causes: protecting the innocent from violence. Her passion, sincerity and candor were impressive. She held convictions worth getting worked up over.

Power would bring some uncommon qualifications to U.S. diplomacy. She is a multilateralist who has also written extensively on the limits and failures of the United Nations. She understands the reality of evil in human affairs — the kind that fills mass graves with bodies and covers them with lime. She believes that the strong have a responsibility to protect the weak. She is outraged at outrageous things. [.........]

During her hearings, Power will be called upon to explain some past statements — contemplating absurd hypotheticals or engaging in partisan excess — that the nominee herself has called “weird” and evidence of “stupidity.” I suspect that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will find her blunt assumption of responsibility for past errors unusual and disarming.

The more important question: Will the appointment of Power and Rice influence the direction of Obama’s foreign policy, which has generally resisted intervention and the assumption of new burdens?

Apart from Syria, it is likely to make a large difference. A number of issues will gain sponsorship at the highest level of government: fighting human trafficking, going after war criminals such as Joseph Kony, anti-atrocity efforts in other regions.  [.......]

On Syria, the options are flawed and the president is hesitant. But it is absurd to think that personnel is irrelevant to policy. Large, immediate shifts are not likely. But moving forward, each incremental choice will be influenced by a team of advisers — including Rice, Power and Secretary of State John Kerry — who are predisposed toward greater support for the responsible Syrian opposition. And if worst comes to worst — as it tends to in Syria — there will be people in the room arguing to prevent mass atrocities. The president, of course, can ignore their counsel — and then spend his retirement explaining why.

[..........]

This points to a role that Power is well-qualified to play. If she spends the next three years trying to make the United Nations work as a model institution, it will be frustrating and useless. If she spends the next three years calling attention to the moral and human consequences of collective decisions, it could make all the difference in the world.

 Read the rest – A Power of conviction

Middle East extermination

by Speranza ( 140 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Barack Obama, Christianity, Dhimmitude, Egypt, History, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Israel, Judaism, Lebanon, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, Orthodox Christianity, Pakistan, Palestinians, Turkey at June 3rd, 2013 - 3:00 pm

A brilliant article by Ralph Peters. I particularly like the way he demolishes the myths of Islamic “learning” – pointing out that it was Greek speaking Christians who preserved the great texts, not Muslims (most of whom were backward and illiterate). Also  he mentions the massacres of Assyrian Christians by the Ottomans in addition to the Armenian genocide.

by Ralph Peters

We are witnesses to murder, and our governments are accomplices. The relentless destruction of the last remnants of the Middle East’s Judeo-Christian civilization is well under way. And we are silent.

Captives of political correctness, our governments cater to radical immigrant tantrums as our leaders contort the truth to deny the existence of Islamist terrorism. Meanwhile, our Middle Eastern “allies” and foes alike eradicate thousands of years of Jewish and Christian heritage. Our diplomats treat the persecution as a minor embarrassment, best ignored.

The banishments and butchery aren’t new, but the breakdown of the last rotting order in the wake of the “Arab Spring” has empowered psychotic fanatics who do not even value the lives of the faithful, let alone the lives of unbelievers. This is the end-game, the final persecution of Christians clinging to lands they’ve called home for 2,000 years. Except for Israel and the rarest exceptions elsewhere, Jews are already gone from the realms that nurtured them since the early years of their faith.

A thousand years ago, there were more Christians in the Middle East than in Europe, and Jewish communities prospered from the Nile to the Tigris. Even a century ago, more than 20% of the region’s population was Christian, and Jews still adorned Arab cities with their talents.

Today, estimates put the Christian population of the region at under 5% and sinking rapidly — and only that high because of the 9 million Copts who remain, for now, in Egypt.

The birthplace of Christianity, Bethlehem, now has a Muslim majority of as much as 80% — a reversal that coincided with the West’s decision to embrace Palestinian terrorists as “partners for peace.” A few decades ago, Lebanon had a Christian majority. Now, with Christian numbers fading, it’s tugged between Shia Hezbollah and Sunni fanatics.

Slighted by the US occupation — as our government pandered to Muslim hardliners — the Christian population of Iraq has fallen by two-thirds over 10 years. And the most ferocious elements in the Syrian insurgency see no place for Christians in Syria’s future. Even Jordan, struggling to appease its own Islamists, has cracked down on Christian activities.

The Jews, of course, are already long gone.

[.......]

If you read the New Testament or study the formative centuries of Christianity, there are few references to western cities other than Rome. The names that dot the Epistles of St. Paul and histories of the church are now in Muslim hands: Alexandria, Damascus, Tarsus, Carthage, Ephesus, Nicaea, Constantinople and so many others. Even Mecca and Medina had thriving Christian and Jewish quarters before the first jihads.

But all they possess does not suffice for Islamist fanatics. Israel must be blotted from the earth, and the last Christians must be driven out.

This is an old, old story, nearing its end. We shroud it in lies to excuse ourselves from taking a stand, even accepting the preposterous Arab claim that Muslim failures today are the fault of the Crusades, a brief interlude when Christians occupied a coastal strip hardly larger than Israel. In fact, it was the Mongols, then the Muslim Turks, who shattered Arab civilization. And as for conquests, Muslims occupied Spain in all or part for 800 years — and brutalized the Balkans for half a millennium. The Crusades were hardly a burp.

We also accept extravagant claims that “civilized” Arabs rescued the classical texts that formed our civilization. That’s utter nonsense. The Arab hordes that burst out of barren Arabia in the 7th century were composed of illiterates. Conquering at a time when the warring Byzantine and Persian empires had exhausted themselves, the new rulers found that tribal practices didn’t suffice to run provinces. So they took over the existing bureaucracies, staffed by Greek-speaking Christians and Jews. It was those officials who saved the Greek classics for Europe’s future Renaissance — and their descendants designed Islam’s greatest monuments.

Yes, some Arab rulers came to value learning — but the Arab world never produced a Homer, Plato, Sophocles or Thucydides whose appeal transcended their culture.

Islam was a religion spread by war. It was only a “religion of peace” where it had conquered. True, Islam sometimes proved more tolerant of minorities than Europeans, but that was at the zenith of the faith’s power.

There’s yet another illusion of ours — that Islam is gaining strength. Islam is on the ropes. What we’ve seen in the pogroms and outright genocides over the last 150 years has been the spleen of a once-triumphant faith whose practices and values can’t compete in the modern age.

Consider today’s Middle East, apart from Israel. Despite the massive influx of oil wealth, there isn’t one world-class university. Nothing of quality or technological complexity is manufactured between Morocco and Pakistan. Not even Saudi Arabia has first-rate health-care. Research is nil. Patent applications are statistically zero. Women are regarded as lesser beings, wasting half of the region’s human capital. Not one Arab society’s a meritocracy. And corruption cripples all.

A handful of glitzy hotels and shopping centers do not make a civilization (especially when the merchandise is all imported). Should Islamist fanatics succeed in driving all minorities from the region, they’d be left with a human wasteland of comprehensive failure, seething with hatred and uncontainable violence.  [........]

Birth rates are a red herring. More mouths to feed are not magic sources of strength in lands of scarcity and poverty. The Middle East is self-destructive, morally brittle and falling ever further behind a world that’s charging ahead. Islamists can’t even get terrorism right — today, we’re terrorizing the terrorists. So they turn on the weak in their midst, the last minorities.

[........]

Enraged by failure, the Ottomans turned on their most-productive minorities — whose successes outraged yesteryear’s fanatics. Beginning in the 1880s and accelerating in the 1890s, pogroms against Armenian Christians stunned Western witnesses. But European leaders turned a blind eye, just as we do today. So during the First World War, the Young Turks who had seized power decided to finish the job.

It was genocide. At least a million Armenians — perhaps twice that number — were systematically exterminated . . . although not without being tortured, raped, starved and death-marched first. The scale of the butchery was such that it obscured other, concurrent genocides, most notably that of Assyrian Christians at the hands of Turks and other Muslims. Estimates of Assyrian deaths run from just under 300,000 to one million.

Nor did the slaughters stop there. In British-created Iraq, massacres of Christians recurred from 1933 to 1961.

City names we know from our recent wars, such as Mosul, Basra or Tikrit (Saddam’s home town), once were centers of Christian culture, with bishops, cathedrals and monasteries famous for learning.

Gone. And the last pale ghosts, those Christians holding on to homes their blood knew for 20 centuries, are soon to go. Meanwhile, our president assures us that “Islam’s a religion of peace.”

[.......]

Mr. President, go to Egypt and explain to the brutalized Copts why your embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood government’s good for them.

Then go to Israel, Mr. President, where Christians worship freely, and tell the Israelis they should “return Palestinian land” after Muslims seized the homes that sheltered Jews for 3,000 years.

Explain to Jews why their temples were profaned and obliterated by the adherents of that “religion of peace.”

Of course, the real tragedy for the Arabs in the last century wasn’t the Naqba, Israel’s close-run struggle to survive attacks by an arc of Arab armies. The tragedy was that the most-backward, intolerant and indolent Arabs, primitive tribesmen, got most of the oil wealth and used it to spread their Wahhabi cult throughout the Islamic world. The intellectuals in the great Arab cities never had a chance.

[.......]

Those villages weren’t abandoned. They were the site of the last century’s first great genocide. No one stood up for those inconvenient Christians.

And no one’s standing up for the Middle East’s tormented Christians now, or for the last handful of Jews left beyond Israel.

[.........]

Read the rest – Middle East genocide

al-Nusra Rebels Destroy Shrine of Abraham

by Macker ( 75 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Koran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Syria at June 3rd, 2013 - 11:30 am

Yes, SATAN is at work again…this time, moving Wahhabis aligned with the Syrian al-Nusra Rebels to surround, blow up, and then bulldoze a shrine dedicated to the Prophet Abraham:

Abraham is the father of the Jewish and Christian faiths. Never mind that the Mohammedans consider him a “pre-Islamic” prophet. Islam, in the destruction of multiple shrines of multiple religions, seeks to erase all history anywhere, leaving only Mo and his band of Murderers, Thieves, Rapists, and Pedophiles.
As the civil war in Syria already shows us, they turn upon each other, and they will eventually get rid of their own shrines, such as the Al-Masjid an-Nabawi, and even Mo’s birthplace, leaving only Mecca. I have written about this effort before; the Wahhabis are merely following the dictates of their true leader, which is not even their moon-god Allah.
And where will Satan be when the following happens to Mecca? In Hell of course, weeping and gnashing his teeth just like the rest of the Damned.

Reason #6,254 for not intervening in Syria: Our “leaders” don’t even know who the people they plan to support are

by lobo91 ( 15 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Muslim Brotherhood, Republican Party, Sharia (Islamic Law), Special Report, Syria at May 30th, 2013 - 12:13 pm

Over the Memorial Day weekend, the intrepid John McCain (R-Alzheimer’s) apparently made a heroic trip to Syria to meet with leaders of the Syrian “rebels.” His brain-dead daughter promptly declared that her dad was the “last of the badasses” for his bravery in visiting the war-torn nation.

The reality, however, is that McCain is the “last of the dumbasses” if he actually believes that the people he wants to help are interested in instituting some sort of Jeffersonian democracy in Syria. Let’s look at some of the stories that have come out in just the past 24 hours related to the Syrian “rebels”:

First, McCain claimed that, contrary to just about every bit of actual evidence, only a “small part” of the rebel forces are made up of Islamic extremists:

US Senator John McCain said on Wednesday, two days after meeting with rebels in Syria, that he is confident the United States can send weapons to fighters in Syria without the risk they will fall into the wrong hands.

“We can identify who these people are. We can help the right people,” McCain said on CNN’s program “Anderson Cooper 360.”

McCain, a Republican, is an outspoken advocate for US military aid to the rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar Assad and has angrily denounced Democratic President Barack Obama – McCain’s opponent in his failed 2008 presidential race – for shying away from deeper US involvement in the conflict, which has claimed 80,000 lives.

Critics of some lawmakers’ push to arm the rebels have expressed concerns that weapons could end up in the hands of militants who might eventually end up using them against the United States or its allies.

But McCain said such radical fighters make up only a small part of the rebels forces.

Unfortunately, the Syrian “rebels” themselves seem to disagree with McCain’s analysis of the situation on the ground:

“There is not even one battalion, in all honesty, that they can control,” the Islamic Front representative said. “These people [senior defectors in the FSA like the one the Libyans had met the night before] were placed as facades, in the beginning, as media personalities, but as real commanders on the ground? Not at all.”

The Libyan’s next question was one he would repeat or refer to 16 times over the next two and a half hours: “Why aren’t you united?” And every time, the Syrians would politely respond that their Islamist battalions were better organized and disciplined and had a clearer chain of command than their more-secular FSA counterparts, but that asking for greater unity than that was a difficult proposition.

Now, one could certainly raise the question of who is actually telling the truth. After all, it’s in the interests of each of the various “rebel” factions to inflate their own importance and dismiss the significance of the competition, right? Unfortunately, pictures don’t lie:

Senator John McCain’s office is pushing back against reports that while visiting Syria this week he posed in a photo with rebels who kidnapped 11 Lebanese Shi’ite pilgrims.

The photo, released by McCain’s office, shows McCain with a group of rebels. Among them are two men identified in the Lebanese press as Mohamed Nour and Abu Ibrahim, two of the kidnappers of the group from Lebanon.

A McCain spokesman said that no one who met with McCain identified themselves by either of those names.

So, the great military genius went to Lebanon, snuck across the border into Syria to meet with secular “rebel” leaders in order to promise them US aid, and wasn’t even able to figure out the fact that he was actually meeting with Islamists, because they pulled a dastardly trick on him and used false names?

If that’s all it takes to fool our “leaders,” we’re truly doomed.

Obama is in denial about what Muslims really believe about jihad

by Speranza ( 168 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, British Islamic Jihadists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, UK at May 26th, 2013 - 12:04 pm

It is not only Obama who is/was in denial,  that would  include Bush,  Blair, Cameron, Boris Johnson and just about any politician who spews out nonsense about Islam being a religion of peace.

by Paul Sperry

Even more shocking than the barbarity of the terrorist attacks in London and Boston is the denial by authorities on both sides of the Atlantic about their common religious motive.

British Muslims offered the same explanation as American Muslims for slaughtering their fellow citizens — Islamic holy war — yet the political classes on both sides of the pond rejected it out of hand.

Just minutes after British-born Michael Adebolajo and another Brit ambushed and decapitated soldier Lee Rigby, 25, in the middle of a London street, he spoke calmly into a camera, his blood-stained hands still holding the meat cleaver: “The only reason we have killed this man today is because Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers, and this British soldier is eye-for-an-eye and tooth-for-a-tooth.”

Adebolajo, 28, added that their holy book commands them to seek such revenge.

London’s mayor dismissed his theological rationale as “deluded” and “deranged.” Prime Minister David Cameron said the sickening attack was “a betrayal of Islam.”

Added the British leader: “There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act.”

A month earlier and more than 3,000 miles away, however, naturalized US citizen Dzhokhar Tsarnaev offered the same justification for massacreing fellow Americans at the Boston marathon with his older brother.

In a note on the boat he was hiding in as police closed in, he called the Boston victims “collateral damage” in a holy war against the West. He also scrawled: “When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims.”

Like his British counterparts, President Obama refuses to see the religious connection. He called the War on Terror over, simply because we say so — without acknowledging that Muslim terrorists certainly don’t think so.

[........]

Is it though?

While such violence is written off in official circles as a distortion of the tenets of Islam, it is in fact scripturally supported. And jihad in defense of Muslims and Islam is actually mainstream thinking inside the Muslim community, widely preached in mosques and Islamic literature across Britain and America. According to recent surveys, moreover, the vast majority of Muslim-Americans harbor a similarly deep resentment against the US-led war on terror and the military waging it.

“Jihad and martyrdom attacks have doctrinal threads that trace back from the crime scene to core Islamic texts,” FBI counterterrorism analyst Bill Gawthrop said. Virtually every homegrown terrorism case since 9/11 cites jihad as motivation.

[........]

Why? Western leaders have not read Islamic texts for themselves, relying instead on Islamic clerics and apologists to tell them what they say about jihad and other sanctioned violence.

That’s a problem. After the London beheading, for instance, Muslim leaders insisted the Koran forbids killing. With typical duplicity, they cited a portion of a verse — “Whoever killed a human being . . . it shall be regarded as having killed all mankind” — while leaving out the critical part: “ . . . except as punishment for murder or other villainy in the land.”

Villainy is defined in the next verse as “those who wage war against Allah,” a crime punishable by — you guessed it — beheading.

An almost willful blindness to what motivates the enemy is preventing the West from effectively defeating it, says retired Army Maj. Stephen Coughlin, who has advised the Pentagon on Islamic military doctrine.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong, as long as the enemy thinks it’s right,” he said. “If the enemy says he’s fighting in the name of green cheese, then we’ve got to know green cheese!”

According to the Koran and other sacred Islamic texts, physical fighting is obligatory on every able-bodied male when Muslim lands are invaded by kaffirs, or non-Muslims. This meaning is undisputed by the four major schools of Sunni jurisprudence.

Jihad is also a communal obligation that can be waged by all other Muslims through the pen, tongue or purse. A share of all Muslim tithing, in fact, is set aside for jihad, Gawthrop points out.

The word “jihad” is derived from the Arabic term for warriors — “mujahideen” — who in the Koran are promised a higher reward in the “gardens of Paradise” than “those who sit at home.” (The London beheader’s nickname was “Mujahid.”)

Obama asserted that “Muslims are a fundamental part of the American family.”

But polls show their loyalties are divided between this nation and the greater Muslim world or brotherhood, known as “the Ummah.” A 2011 Gallup poll said Muslims here “strongly identify” with the global Ummah, which includes Afghanistan and Iraq and all other Muslim lands and therefore transcends nationalism, patriotism and even secular friendships in importance.

The same poll found that 83% of Muslim-Americans disapprove of the war in Iraq and almost half say the US never should have sent troops into Afghanistan — even after 9/11.

An earlier survey by Pew, moreover, found that 1 in 4 young US Muslims think suicide bombings to defend Islam are justified.

More and more Muslims living among us are taking violent jihad seriously. To them, the war isn’t just in Afghanistan and Iraq. It’s right here, and the war zones include not just sporting events and city streets but shopping malls, amusement parks, even schools — all fair targets in their holy war.

[........]

Politically taboo or not, it’s time America had a frank national discussion about the “holy” words that motivate such bloodlust, and what they actually mean to the Muslim community, because it’s clear these words can kill.

Read the rest – ‘You will never be safe’

Be Warned America, One Of The Things Necessary For True Evil To Flourish Is True Stupidity,

by Flyovercountry ( 53 Comments › )
Filed under Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, UK at May 24th, 2013 - 7:00 am

View image on Twitter

When I first saw the picture above, I had not initially read the headline. I thought the guy was wearing red gloves. Sadly, this was not the case. It seems that the man in the picture above, for a reason we’ll discuss in a bit, decided along with an accomplice, to attack a complete stranger and cut his head off. The, “red gloves,” he sported turned out to be the blood of his victim. He committed this act of pure barbarism in broad daylight, on a busy London street, and felt no impulse to flee the scene ahead of local police, who by the way took 20 full minutes to arrive, There is an added importance to this fact, which we’ll also discuss in later. They strutted about like rock stars afterwords, granting interviews to people with cell phones. During the times when citizen journalists weren’t recording their rants, they gloated over their accomplishment, taunting the government and the citizens of the nation in which they live.

The motivation for our murderous thugs is not something that requires a psychic. It was not a random act of disaffected youths acting in response to some desperate societal depression. The thought, “I can’t find a job so maybe I’ll kill someone,” was not racing through the otherwise innocent minds of Britain’s future. They quite clearly were shouting, “Allah hu akhbar.” as they severed their victim’s head in front of shocked witnesses. During their many spontaneous interviews, they described in detail that this was their contribution to jihad, Islam’s very visible war with the West, our culture, and our principle of freedom. They strutted around like proud peacocks, not worried about the consequences of their actions, because they were convinced that 72 virgin somethings await them in the grand traditional Islamic afterlife, in which every selfish base desire man kind is capable of having will be satisfied as a reward for those who kill infidels in the most gruesome manner possible.

Until yesterday, Britain and the people in charge of her have pretended that terrorism and Islam have no connection. That changed yesterday, as their Prime Minister, David Cameron, for the first time connected those dots in an official manner. Britain it seems is tired of paying the price for appeasement. Their problem of course is that with decades worth of Muslims who have already established deeply entrenched pockets of Sharia throughout England, they’re in for one hell of a bad time ahead. They are infested with this cancer upon their society, and it was their willful blindness that did it to them.

We have the same problem here. We have the same pockets of deeply entrenched Sharia existing here. Those same sleeper cells that have infested England, have infested us here, and have already made their presence known. There is a price to pay for pretending that there is no connection between Islam and terrorism. That price was paid in Boston most recently. The politically correct and their police force are going to get the rest of us killed, or worse. Handling acts of terror as police matters, and offering empty platitudes as our weapon to combat them will prove as in effective in the future as those methods have been in the past.

This next point I wish to say while you keep a little piece of personal disclosure in mind. While in High School, and through part of my college experience, many years ago, I was one of these people. So believe me when I tell you this. When you see one of these bumper stickers on the back of a car,

you are in the presence of museum grade stupidity. You may wish to get your camera out, and take pictures of who belongs to the sentiment, and place that photo with your collection of other curios. The owner of that sticky backed messaging performed a miracle simply by placing their pants on correctly during the morning hours, let alone driving a car without a brain.

This politically correct message of unbridled appeasement makes at its core a dangerously naive assumption. It combines an asinine level of moral equivalence with a willful blindness that guarantees the annihilation of all societies that follow its advice.

It assumes that all societies are equal, with none being morally superior or even preferable to others. It equates the acts of groups where public beheadings and honor killings are considered acceptable behavior with those who’s acts of barbarism include cutting off the hair and shaving off the beards of any the guilty seek to intimidate. For the liberals reading this, blowing yourself up on a school bus and taking 40 children with you to meet Allah is not on the same level morally speaking as those who spray paint insulting messages on buildings thought to be bars with patrons seeking an, “alternative,” lifestyle.

The other glaring problem with this bumper sticker is that it assumes, quite moronically, that all of the referenced groups have equal amounts of trouble getting along with the others in that collection. Coexisting would be no problem for any of the last five groups, if the first one did not feel that world domination was its duty to their Deity. The message of this idiocy is that the remaining five groups referenced are unwilling to coexist, while ignoring that the first group actually is unwilling to coexist.

There is another aspect to this story. The two assailants were armed, not only with knives and cleavers, but with guns also. In England, guns are not legal to possess, even for police. Somehow, the criminals found a way to break that law, and why shouldn’t they. Clearly, obeying the laws of the land was not one of their priorities. The Police took longer to arrive, because they were tipped that they would be facing a situation where the bad guys had guns. They were able to strut around for 20 minutes unchallenged, precisely because they knew that no one passing by on the street would be armed. When the police arrived, they opened fire on the cops.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Dzhokhar (Jahar)’s nurses admit they feel sorry for him

by Rodan ( 137 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Chechnya, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives at May 20th, 2013 - 11:30 am

Dzhokhar (Jahar) Tsarnaev has become an icon to the Hipster set. The Free Jahar movement continues to grow like a cancerous tumor in the popular culture. Young women are expressing their desires to bear his kid. He has become the Che of a new generation and a cause celeb. This infatuation with Jahar has even reached his nurses. Some of them admit feeling sorry for him and have a hard time not calling him “hon.”

Nurses treating Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev say their natural inclination toward compassion makes it difficult to see the 19-year-old as a possible terrorist. And they have to make concerted effort — and buddy-system pacts — to keep from referring to him with terms of endearment such as “hon.”

One 29-year-old nurse said on Gawker: “When you’re in the room, it’s just a patient. You’re here to … make sure they’re feeling better. When you step away, you take it in. I am compassionate, that’s what we do. But should I be? The rest of the world hates him right now.”

[....]

“You see a hurt 19-year-old and you can’t help but feel sorry for him,” the nurse said, as Gawker reported.

I really wish more was done to confront this Free Jahar movement. People need to show the picture of the 8 year old kid murdered by this Islamic coward. It should be socially unacceptable for anyone to sympathize with this demonic Chechen scumbag. Instead the Free Jahar movement is treated with kids gloves and not many are calling out these people for what they are. The Free Jahar movement are traitors to America and terror enablers. It is time to confront and destroy this evil vile movement on.

7 Chemical Engineers From Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Caught Trespassing at Boston Resevoir

by huckfunn ( 12 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Breaking News, CAIR, Crime, Cult of Obama, government, Headlines, immigration, Islam, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Janet Napolitano, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at May 15th, 2013 - 9:44 am

If theses people aren’t U.S. citizens, they should be deported immediately. Committing any crime above a traffic ticket should be grounds for expulsion for any non-citizen. When are we going to stop coddling the people who would kill us? The people who are sworn to protect and defend this country and her people are not doing their jobs.

BELCHERTOWN (CBS) – Shortly after midnight Tuesday, seven people were caught trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir.

State Police say the five men and two women are from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore, and “cited their education and career interests” for being in the area. The men told police they were chemical engineers and recent college graduates.

The Quabbin, in Belchertown, is one of the country’s largest man-made public water supplies. Boston’s drinking water comes from the Quabbin and the Wachusett Reservoirs.

State Police say there were no warrants or advisories on any of the individuals and “there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing.”

All seven were allowed to leave and will be summonsed to court for trespassing. The FBI is investigating and routine checks of public water supplies have been increased following the incident.

The seven individuals currently live in Amherst, Cambridge, Sunderland, Northampton and New York City. Police have not released their names because a court date has not been set.

Read the entire article here. 

Teen Female Hipsters fuel the Free Jahar Movement

by Rodan ( 245 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Chechnya, Communism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives at May 13th, 2013 - 6:00 pm

To the majority of Americans, Dzhokhar (Jahar) Tsarnaev is an Islamist terrorist scum. To Hipsters, the Chechen terrorist has become the new Che of their generation. With his Hipster looks, Jahar is considred one of them and as such, he has become a cause. This has even reached teenage Hipster girls, who view Jahar as sex symbol and cultural icon.

Some teenage Hipsters have gone so far as to even have Jahar’s tweets tatooed on their arms. Even worse, some of the smitten young hipster chicks have written romantic fantasies about him. A few even have offered to bear his child!

Thousands of American teen girls are crushing on Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar “Jahar” Tsarnaev, 19 — and leading a social-media movement to exonerate him.

The swooning teens will not accept allegations that the bushy-haired college kid — whom they refer to by his nickname, “Jahar” — and his brother, Tamerlan, 26, killed three and maimed hundreds by setting off bombs at the April 15 race and killed an MIT police officer during the ensuing manhunt.

While some scrawl the hashtag “#FreeJahar” on their hands with markers, an 18-year-old in Topeka, Kansas, is going to the extreme — she wants the Dzhokhar’s words inked on her arm forever.

“Getting one of Jahar’s tweets tattooed on me tomorrow. Guess you could say I’m a #FreeJahar supporter,” “@keepitbluntedd” tweeted on May 7.

[....]

On Wattpad, “Stringcheesekitteh” wrote the three-part story “Tsarnaev,” set in the prison medical facility where Dzhokhar is being held. In the tale, a young resident psychiatrist finds herself mesmerized by his eyes — and flirting with danger.

The author wrote that the story was not meant to “offend anyone” and did not express “strong sentiments for or against the suspect.”

Anonymous works on Pastebin.com include fantasy sex and romance scenes with the terrorist.

One scribe imagined Tsarnaev having one last moment of intimacy before getting arrested.

“He kissed your neck, sucking on it to leave his mark, biting down on it every now and then,” reads one scene set just before his arrest.

This is not a laughing matter and is actually scary. Unlike other Islamic terrorists who look scrabby and like 7th Century idiots, Jahar looks like your typical Hipster. The fact he is White allows Hipsters to relate to him and consider him one of their own. Jahar is rapidly becoming a cultural icon to the Hipster set and expect to see T-Shirts and even a movie glorifying him.

The Hipster movement is the base of the Democrat Party and helped fuel the rise of Obama. Despite their stupid animal hats, this is the most dangerous political movement this nation has ever faced. Conservatives continue to underestimate Hipsters at their peril.