Archive for the ‘Elections’ Category

Obama’s Fanatical Progressivism causes Division

by Rodan ( 120 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives at March 10th, 2010 - 5:30 am

Barack Hussein Obama has transformed into one of the most divisive presidents in modern times. His pursuit of a Radical Progressive agenda has alienated Conservatives and Moderates. He has angered many on the Left as well. Obama has thrown our allies under the bus and is pursuing a 3rd World Liberation philosophy when it comes to our foreign policy. This is the Cloward-Piven strategy being implemented to fundamentally transform America into a Totalitarian Progressive regime.

WASHINGTON — Whatever the legislative fate of health reform — now in the hands of a few besieged House Democrats — the health reformers have failed in their argument. Their proposal has divided Democrats while uniting Republicans, returned American politics to well-worn ideological ruts, employed legislative tactics that smack of corruption, squandered the president’s public standing, lowered public regard for Congress to French revolutionary levels, sucked the oxygen from other agenda items, re-engaged the abortion battle, produced freaks and prodigies of nature such as a Republican senator from Massachusetts, raised questions about the continued governability of America and caused the White House chief of staff to distance himself from the president’s ambitions.

Read it here: Obama is Choosing Liberal Divisiveness

The American public have had enough of his divisive agenda. Rather than unite the nation to meet our challenges, he has divided us and pitted us against each other. This is how Progressives achieve their aims, by playing off one group against another. They will stop at nothing to accomplish their goals and the last year has been evidence of this.

Americans must unite against Obama and his Totalitarian agenda. He is in trouble politically and we must keep up the pressure.

(Picture Hat Tip: Savage)

Low-tax Texas beats big-government California

by Speranza ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at March 9th, 2010 - 5:00 am

Wow that’s a real shocker! /not.  A state that believes in individuality and personal responsibility versus a state of fruits and nuts that wants government to just take care of them. However there is an alleged rumor out there that Rick Perry is a  CREATIONIST!

by Michael Barone

“Stop messing with Texas!” That was the message Gov. Rick Perry bellowed on election night as he celebrated his victory over Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison in the Republican primary for governor. In his reference to Texas’ anti-littering slogan, Perry was making a point applicable to national as well as Texas politics and addressed to Democratic politicians as well as Republicans.

His point was that the big-government policies of the Obama administration and Democratic congressional leaders are resented and fiercely opposed not just because of their dire fiscal effects but also as an intrusion on voters’ independence and ability to make decisions for themselves.

[...]

They are lessons that are particularly vivid when you contrast Texas, the nation’s second most populous state, with the most populous, California. Both were once Mexican territory, secured for the United States in the 1840s. Both have grown prodigiously over the past half-century. Both have populations that today are about one-third Hispanic.

But they differ vividly in public policy and in their economic progress — or lack of it — over the last decade. California has gone in for big government in a big way. Democrats hold big margins in the legislature largely because affluent voters in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay area favor their liberal positions on cultural issues.

Those Democratic majorities have obediently done the bidding of public employee unions to the point that state government faces huge budget deficits. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s attempt to reduce the power of the Democratic-union combine with referenda was defeated in 2005 when public employee unions poured $100 million — all originally extracted from taxpayers — into effective TV ads.

Californians have responded by leaving the state. From 2000 to 2009, the Census Bureau estimates, there has been a domestic outflow of 1,509,000 people from California — almost as many as the number of immigrants coming in. Population growth has not been above the national average and, for the first time in history, it appears that California will gain no House seats or electoral votes from the reapportionment following the 2010 census.

Read the rest here: Low-tax Texas beats big-government California

Elitist Republican reluctant to fight Progressives

by Rodan ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Progressives, Republican Party at March 7th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

When former President George W. Bush developed his Progressive Compassionate Conservative Ideology, he set up his administration for failure. As soon as he came into office, the Radical Totalitarian Progressives began non stop attacks. He became an object of ridicule and it became cool to oppose Bush. When 9/11 occurred there was a break in Bush bashing, but this did not last. After Bush’s Iraq blunder, his popularity began to decline and the Left jumped all over it. Using Alinsky style attacks, the Progressives destroyed his presidency and BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome) became a hip opinion.

Why were these attacks successful? This was due to Bush not fighting back and allowing the Left to define the terms of debate. Karl Rove admitted this was their biggest error. Why didn’t Bush fight back? He was an elitist Progressive Republican who wanted to get along with the Left since he agreed with many of their goals. This mentality is prominent with Leftist Republicans like John McCain, Lindsay Graham and even some Donors.

A prominent Evangelical figure and Republican donor says he will end his contributions to the organized Republican Party in reaction to the leaked fundraising presentation that advised using “fear” to solicit contributions and displayed an image of President Obama as the Joker from Batman.

Mark DeMoss, who heads a major Christian public relations firm in Atlanta and served as a liaison to the Evangelical community for Mitt Romney in 2008, wrote Chairman Michael Steele yesterday that he was “ashamed” of the presentation, calling depictions of Obama, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Majority Leader Harry Reid “shameful, immature and uncivil, at best.”

“I’m afraid the presentation is representative of a culture and mindset within the Republican National Committee,” DeMoss, a past member of the RNC’s “Eagle” program for top donors who gave the party $15,000 in 2008, wrote in the letter to Steele, which he shared with POLITICO. (DeMoss hasn’t given this cycle.) “Consequently, I will no longer contribute to any fundraising entity of our Party—but will contribute only to individual candidates I choose to support.”

Read the rest: RNC Fallout: ‘Ashamed’ donor closes checkbook

Mark DeMoss is the type of Compassionate Conservative who is afraid to fight the Progressives. He would rather drink tea and try to reason with the Left, rather than fight. As Glenn Beck and the Tea Parties have proven, the Progressives when attacked can’t fight effective. No mercy is to be given them since they view politics as war. People like DeMoss need to get out the way, and let those that want to fight go for victory.

Compassionate Conservatism is a failed Ideology and Republicans must reject this ideology and it’s quisling mentality.

Geert Wilder’s Speech to The House of Lords

by Rodan ( 162 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Elections, Elections 2010, Europe, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives at March 5th, 2010 - 5:00 pm

Dutch Anti-Colonialist resistance leader, Geert Wilders, made a speech to the House of Lords in Britain today. He presented his movie Fitna which shows what Islamic Imperialism is all about. Our EDL friends marched in support of Geert Wilders and to counter the Leftist-Islamic Axis. His party made gains in the Dutch Municipal elections and is posed to do well in the June Parliamentary Elections. Geert is at the forefront of European resistance to Islamic Colonization.

Below is his speech to the House of Lords.

Thank you. It is great to be back in London. And it is great that this time, I got to see more of this wonderful city than just the detention centre at Heathrow Airport.

Today I stand before you, in this extraordinary place. Indeed, this is a sacred place. This is, as Malcolm always says, the mother of all Parliaments, I am deeply humbled to have the opportunity to speak before you.

Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for your invitation and showing my film ‘Fitna’. Thank you my friends for inviting me.

I first have great news. Last Wednesday city council elections were held in the Netherlands. And for the first time my party, the Freedom Party, took part in these local elections. We participated in two cities. In Almere, one of the largest Dutch cities. And in The Hague, the third largest city; home of the government, the parliament and the queen. And, we did great! In one fell swoop my party became the largest party in Almere and the second largest party in The Hague. Great news for the Freedom Party and even better news for the people of these two beautiful cities.

And I have more good news. Two weeks ago the Dutch government collapsed. In June we will have parliamentary elections. And the future for the Freedom Party looks great. According to some polls we will become the largest party in the Netherlands. I want to be modest, but who knows, I might even be Prime Minister in a few months time!

Read it here: Speech House of Lords, London, Friday the 5th of March 2010

Here is my favorite part:

If I may quote one of my favourite American presidents: Ronald Reagan once said: “We need to act today, to preserve tomorrow”.

Geert Wilders is no Fascist, He’s a Reagan Conservative!

(Hat Tip: Delectable)

Texas-Sized Lesson

by Speranza ( 156 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, George W. Bush, John McCain, Republican Party, Sarah Palin at March 5th, 2010 - 11:00 am

Although not an expert on Texas politics,  I do recognize a Republican (think John McCain) who has spent far too much time developing Potomac fever and her name is Kay Bailey Hutchison. I am particularly glad that the author called out the Bush/Rove/Karen Hughes  “new tone” strategy mentality of being gentlemen and reaching out to your opponents. I know that Rick Perry seems to have Texas’s economy in a lot better shape then most states and as far as Medina goes – that 9/11 Troofer moment on Beck’s show was a bit much.

by C. Edmund Wright

While the ever-helpful Jurassic media is trying to force-feed conservatives and Republicans groupthink analysis of Rick Perry’s thumping of Kay Bailey Hutchison (KBH), the GOP had better heed the main lesson: The “new tone” era is over.

Consider: The political team and concepts that dominated the Lone Star State just ten years ago and subsequently engineered two presidential elections just got whipped in what amounts to an intramural contest in their own state.

KBH’s incompetent primary campaign was itself a caricature of the senior senator — and it was precisely that caricature that her opponents wanted to portray. Perry and Tea Party candidate Debra Medina did not have to do much but get out of the way and let the KBH campaign prove that the senior senator and her top advisers were indeed all creatures of Washington who are hopelessly out of touch.

And for some reason, Hutchison, along with advisers Karl Rove and Karen Hughes, thought that the best way to counter this was to bring in George Bush 41, George Bush 43, and James Baker to campaign. Were John McCain, Bob Dole, and Olympia Snowe too busy to come?

Oh, and to top it off, the Hutchison campaign ads featured endorsements from the traditional liberal newspapers. Conversely, Perry brought in Sarah Palin to campaign for him and proudly addressed numerous tea party rallies.

[...]

… Remember that Rove was the architect of Bush’s “new tone” governing and communications strategy that was implemented right after Bush was declared the winner in 2000. The new tone was much like being able to “work with people.” The first new tone decision was to not even debate the national raw vote situation, a decision that still fuels anti-Republican sentiment to this day.

The bottom line is that the new tone was never called for by Americans. To think so was to be rather tone-deaf. Any strategy based on the assumption that people just could not get along — and ignores the possibility of legitimate and deep ideological divides — misses the point. By definition, the new tone more or less meant not debating your opponents very vigorously before compromising with them on almost everything.

Read the rest here: Texas-Sized Lesson: The New Tone Era Is Over

Dutch Freedom Party makes gains

by Rodan ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Politics at March 4th, 2010 - 6:00 am

The Dutch Freedom Party made gains in Dutch municipal elections Wednesday. This is a sign that the Dutch have had it with Colonialists who are attempting to take over their country. The message of Geert Wilders is catching on and the Dutch Resistance to Imperialism is growing.

In the Hague, with 77% of the votes counted, Geert Wilders’ anti-immigration PVV had taken 17.5% of the vote to end in second place. Labour remained in first place with 21% of the vote.

The PVV was also set to be the biggest party in the new town of Almere. The party is only contesting the local elections in the two cities.

Read it here: Liberal parties big winners in local elections

In Europe Liberal refers to Libertarian Conservatives or the Right.

This is a precursor to the Dutch general elections in June. Let’s hope the Freedom Party wins and send a message. Europeans do not want Islamo-Imperialism.

‘Governor Moonbeam’ could return to power in California

by Speranza ( 248 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics at March 3rd, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Say it ain’t so! The prototypical California politcian might come back? I have seen him the past few years on television and he actually seems to have matured quite a bit – but come on!  He has long sinced passed his “sell by” date and California needs to be governed on strict conservative, not New Age principles. Jerry Brown is very much a 1970’s politician but I think I know a certain blogger who would be a big Brown supporter.

by Nick Allen

Jerry Brown, 71, a Democrat, has twice before served as governor of the most populous state in the US and was nicknamed “Governor Moonbeam” after proposing that California deploy communications satellites into space.

He previously chose to live in an apartment costing $250 (£150) a month instead of the governor’s mansion. He also used to date the singer Linda Ronstadt.

Brown, who is currently the state’s attorney general, officially declared his candidacy on his website.

[...]

A January poll by the Public Policy Institute of California gave Brown a 41 per cent to 36 per cent lead over Republican Meg Whitman. His lead over Steve Poizner, another Republican candidate, was 44 per cent to 29 per cent.

Brown served two terms as governor from 1975 to 1983 and ran for the Democrat nomination for US President three times, coming second to Bill Clinton in 1992.

Read the rest here: ‘Governor Moonbeam’ could return to power in California

Breaking News: Obama to use Reconciliation

by Rodan ( 200 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at March 3rd, 2010 - 11:43 am

Barack Hussein Obama showed his 3rd World Dictator colors today. In a move that would make Mugabe, Idi Amin, Castro and Hugo Chavez proud, he is going to shove his Eugenics based Health Care bill down our throats. Ignoring the polls and the election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts, he is going ahead with reconciliation. This process cuts debate and allows passage of a bill with just 51 votes. This is used only for budget purposes, not a radical transformation of our Health Care system.

WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama urged Congress Wednesday to vote “up or down” on sweeping health care legislation in the next few weeks, endorsing a plan that denies Senate Republicans the right to kill the bill by stalling with a filibuster.

“I don’t see how another year of negotiations would help. Moreover, the insurance companies aren’t starting over,” Obama said, rejecting Republican calls to begin anew on an effort to remake the health care system.

Read it here: Time to act on health care, Obama declares

If there is any doubt about the Totalitarian nature of the Progressive movement, this is evidence of it. Barack Hussein Obama is living out his childhood fantasy of being a 3rd world tyrant. The problem is – he’s doing it here in America. With more debt and more government control, Obama is making sure we become the 3rd World nation of his dreams.

Progressives will blame Bush even in 2012

by Rodan ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Politics, Progressives at March 3rd, 2010 - 6:00 am

Since 2001 the Progressives have blamed George W. Bush for every ill on this planet. Bush has been blamed for earthquakes, hurricanes, September 11th, aids, cancer, plane crashes, bridges falling, snow storms, polar bears dying and every other ill imaginable to humanity.  This blaming of Bush worked to elect Democrats in 2006 and 2008.

Radical totalitarian Progressive, Barack Hussein Obama, constantly blames Bush for everything. He never owns up to a problem. As recent elections have proven, this tactic is not working. Obama even blamed Bush for the Democrat’s recent losses! For the 2010 Midterms and 2012 Elections, the Progressives and Obama are planning to resort to Bush bashing in the hopes that old trick will work again.

In the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama was supposed to run against John McCain. But, early on, he decided that he’d much rather run against George W. Bush.

Obama was elected. But the campaign against Bush continues to this day. Whenever Obama gets in a tight scrape or suffers a setback or loses part of the electorate, he blames Bush.

After the voters of Massachusetts elected Republican Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate, ABC News’ George Stephanopolous asked Obama to interpret the election results.

“People are angry,” Obama responded, “and they’re frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years.”

Read it all here: Will Obama Still Be Blaming Bush in 2012? Bet on It

Progressives are really children in adult bodies. They always look for a scapegoat and when losing an argument, they name call and project like calling their opponents racist. Barack Hussein Obama is man-child who can’t handle criticism or responsibility. He throws tantrums and ends up blaming Bush for all of his failures. Rather than debate, he gets nasty and calls names. He is clearly not up for the job.

Barack Hussein Obama is the Tiger Woods and Michael Jackson of politics. He’s a man-child who grew up in a bubble and had everything handed to him. He will never claim responsibility for anything.

Tories and Cameron blow Huge Point lead in UK Elections

by Rodan ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Islamic Invasion, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Tranzis, UK at March 1st, 2010 - 12:00 pm

The UK, like America, has had a financial crisis. Like America, they have  a Totalitarian regime that appeases the enemy of the British people while demonizing the patriotic British. UK cities have Islamic No Go zones and even Sharia law is accepted there. Unemployment is up and the people are angry about the direction of their nation. This would spell trouble for any government and it appeared to be the case a few months ago when the Tories (Conservatives) had a double digit point lead. However that has vanished to 2 points now and the current radical Progressive PM Gordon Brown may lead a Minority Government .

David Cameron, the favorite to become the U.K.’s next prime minister, has seen his commanding lead over Gordon Brown vanish. Alex Massie on how “change” has lost its magic for the Tories.

It wasn’t supposed to be like this. An exhausted Labour Party led by an unpopular, charmless prime minister whose economic policies had helped bankrupt the country was supposed to be sleepwalking to electoral disaster. Barring calamity, David Cameron’s Conservatives would win this year’s British general election and win it handsomely to boot. Suddenly, however, that’s no longer such a slam dunk. The Tories are wobbling and British politics is less predictable and more interesting than seemed possible just a couple of months ago.

A Sunday Times survey this week reported that the Tories hold just a two-point advantage and consequently, thanks to the quirks of the current constituency boundaries, Labour would, if this result were repeated in the election itself, emerge as the largest party.

Read it here: Will Britain’s Conservatives Blow it?

(more…)

Favorgate: Obama Administration breaks federal law, offers job to Dem Senate candidate opposing Sen. Mike Bennett, D-CO.

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Crime, Democratic Party, Elections, Leftists, Politics, Progressives at February 27th, 2010 - 8:30 am

Here’s yet more proof that most democrats, starting right at the top with The Zero™, are criminals and have no problem breaking federal laws, and as usual the state-controlled media buries their collective heads in the sand and ignores it.

Favorgate
What did the president know, and when did he know it?
Posted by Mark Impomeni
Tuesday, February 23rd at 9:00AM EST

We take a break from the hyperventilating over the latest moves in the slow-motion kabuki dance that is the Obama Administration’s efforts to ram its federal takeover of the health care system down the throats of the overwhelming majority of Americans who oppose the various bills to take a look at what should be a much, much bigger story.

Last week, Democratic Senate Candidate Joe Sestak, a retired Admiral, let slip in an interview that someone in the White House offered him a position in the Administration if he would drop his primary challenge of Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania. Sestak wouldn’t elaborate on which job he was offered – speculation centers on Secretary of the Navy – but it hardly matters. As Jeffrey Lord points out, federal law prohibits anyone from offering, soliciting, or receiving any federal office in exchange for a political favor.

“Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” – 18 USC Sec. 211

It seems highly unlikely that this was a misunderstanding or exaggeration on Sestak’s part. It’s the second time in this election season that another Democrat has accused the White House of trying to buy them out of a Senate challenge with an offer of employment.

Last year, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s deputy, Jim Messina, reportedly suggested that Colorado Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff might find himself a position in the Department of the Interior if he dropped his prospective primary challenge of Sen. Michael Bennett. Romanoff, like Sestak, refused to be bought off.

The Sestak and Bennett incidents are potentially far worse than that. Republicans need to start asking very pointed, very public questions, right now. They should call for a Special Counsel to lead a Department of Justice investigation along the lines of Patrick Fitzgerald’s look at the Valerie Plame affair. Even if no wrongdoing is uncovered, the atmospherics of this scandal in waiting are bad for the Obama White House. The president would have to explain why relativley low-level staffers in his Administration feel empowered to offer high-ranking positions as plums for doing the Administration’s bidding without consulting their superiors.

Read the rest here

Paul Ryan Schools Barack Hussein Obama

by Rodan ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Republican Party at February 26th, 2010 - 12:30 pm

Rep Paul Ryan of Wisconsin is rapidly becoming my favorite Republican. He has offered a Blueprint called Move America Forward. The plan calls for a balanced budget and making America competitive again. Yesterday at the Health care summit, he really took Obama apart. While Obama appealed on fairness and emotion, Paul emphasized facts. He took apart Obama’s plan and made the case that the spending was not sustainable.

I hope Paul Ryan runs for President. He offers a clear contrast to Obama’s Totalitarian Progressive agenda. We don’t need another Compassionate Conservative. We need a Fighter!

Update:  New CNN Poll out says  Majority says government a threat to citizens’ rights. This is part of America’s rejection of  The Totalitarian Ideology of Progressivism.

Health Care Summit recap

by Rodan ( 231 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, John McCain, Progressives, Republican Party at February 25th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

I didn’t get to watch much of this summit. However in my Lunch Break, I did get see Eric Cantor and yes, even McCain take Obama to task. What I noticed is that Barack Hussein Obama the whole time was smirking at the Republicans. he seemed arrogant and also looking at them as they are inferior. His posture was that of a 3rd World Dictator feeling untouchable looking down at the Peasants.

What are the Netizen’s take on this?

Let’s have a discussion on this summit.

Update: below are some Clips showing Obama’s arrogance.

Obama on Time Division

Obama: We’re Not Campaigning

Obama Scolds Cantor

(Video Hat Tips:Breitbart TV)

Progressives in 2005 were against Reconciliation

by Rodan ( 118 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at February 25th, 2010 - 5:00 am

Good morning Blogmocracy Netizens! I hope everyone is ready for another day and in good health. I found some Leftwing hypocrisy to share with you all.

The Tranzi Totalitarian Neo-Feudal Progressive controlled Congress is talking about using the process of reconciliation, which requires just 51 votes to pass their Eugenics based Obamacare. They are telling the Republicans to stop complaining about it. However back in 2005, they themselves were against such a process. They called it the Nuclear option when republicans considered using it to get some of Bush’s judges appointed. Well let’s a take a trip back to 2005, to see what they said back then.

At the National Press Club on April 26, 2005, then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was asked about a move being discussed by Senate Republicans, then in control, to change the Senate rules so as to require a mere majority vote rather than the 60 votes necessary to end a potential filibuster.

“You know, the Founders designed this system, as frustrating it is, to make sure that there’s a broad consensus before the country moves forward,” then-Sen. Obama told the audience.

Read it here: Obama Quotes on Senate Rules in 2005 Given New Scrutiny

How times have changed. Now that he has power, it’s OK to do what he accused the GOP of wanting to do. Progressives always project their intentions on their opponent.

Here are the progressives in their own words.

This is just a latest example of Progressive hypocrisy.

54% of Texas Hispanics are Conservative

by Rodan ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Racism, Republican Party at February 24th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

The Progressive Media has been hyping that Texas will turn into a Democratic State. The basis for this assumption is the growing Hispanic population in that state. Well a new Poll comes out that throws cold water on this theory. More than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves Conservative. This doesn’t surprise me as I have encountered many of my Tejano (Hispanic Texans) cousins and they are even more Conservative than I, especially on social issues. Texas is one of those states where discussing social issues works in the GOP’s favor. This is drawing many Tejanos into the Right and rejecting the Totalitarian Progressive Movement and their attempts to enslave them.

AUSTIN – A bent to conservatism and family makes Hispanics a promising pool of votes for Republicans, but the party’s targeting of illegal immigrants has withered its attraction.

Regardless, Gov. Rick Perry has fared relatively well, perhaps because of his anti-Washington rhetoric and his careful immigration stance, a recent poll indicates.

It shows more than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves conservative, and a surprising 23 percent say they might participate in Tuesday’s GOP primary. Among those, Perry leads Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison by 2 to 1, according to the poll, commissioned by an Austin consultant for a national group of Hispanic legislative leaders.

Read the rest here: More than half of Hispanics identify as conservative, poll finds

With control of the Education system, the Left has erased the true history of Hispanics. Instead they emphasize victimhood and teach us that we are inferior to whites. Thankfully, in my case my Spaniard Grandfather taught me about the 700 year Resistance to Arab Aggression  and how for 150 year the Spanish Empire had the world by the balls. This gave me pride and lead me to reject the slave mentality that many of my fellow Hispanics have. This is why I despise Progressives, because it is personal to me. They lied about my history and view me as inferior. They only racially insult any Rightwing Hispanic like Marco Rubio, who doesn’t accept subservient status.

The article of course downplays the findings by claiming that 70% define themselves as Democrats. This doesn’t mean anything, remember the Reagan Democrats? They were White Catholics who, although Democrats, voted for Reagan in 1980 and 1984. Many switched to the GOP and their Children also vote Republican. Hispanics are no different. Contrary to the racist Progressive myth the Hispanic experience is closer to the White Catholic one, than the Black experience in America. We are an immigrant group and like all before want to achieve the American dream. The Totalitarian Progressives  don’t want Hispanics to succeed. They want us to live in Ghettos and be their serfs as they have tried to do to Blacks. Well I have news for the racist Left, it isn’t going to happen!