Archive for the ‘Elections’ Category
by Rodan ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at March 18th, 2010 - 12:00 pm
It is obvious that the reason for Congressional Progressives pushing the Eugenics based Health care plan is Ideological. Barack Hussein Obama’s reason is that he feels his presidency is at stake. Clearly Mr. Hussein feels that in order for his Presidency to be successful, he needs to implement his dark fascistic agenda. For him it’s about remodeling America to fit his Neo-Feudal vision of an elite based society. He is pitching this to Democrats in Congress as the reason to pass Obamacare.
President Barack Obama had exhausted most of his health care reform arguments with members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus during a White House meeting last Thursday when he made a more personal pitch that resonated with many skeptics in the room.
One caucus member told POLITICO that Obama won him over by “essentially [saying] that the fate of his presidency” hinged on this week’s health reform vote in the House. The member, who requested anonymity, likened Obama’s remarks to an earlier meeting with progressives when the president said a victory was necessary to keep him “strong” for the next three years of his term.
For Barack Hussein Obama this is all about him. It’s not about what the American people want or what’s good for the nation, it’s about his Presidency. The President is supposed to be in our service, but this is not the case in the mind of Mr. Hussein. We are his servants and he is our Feudal overlord. This man has one of the biggest egos ever.
Tags: Eugenics, Obamacare
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives | 95 Comments »
by Rodan ( 119 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at March 18th, 2010 - 6:42 am
Good morning Blogmocracy Netizens!
It’s crunch time with the Eugenics based Obamacare. Instead of following regular procedures for a change of this magnitude, the Progressives are using tricks. They are using reconciliation, which is a budget process to implement their health care agenda. This is unprecedented for a change of this size. Even with the polls showing the American public not wanting this Totalitarian reform, they are going ahead anyway. Clearly for the Leftist Democrats, this is about Ideology not politics.
Congress’s latest final push in its ideological crusade called health reform is shaping up to be an act of historic arrogance and deception.
For months, the American people have been telling Congress to scrap the current bills. A recent CNN poll found that 7 in 10 Americans want Congress to start over on health care, or quit working on the issue altogether. Yet, the majority in Congress continues to march on in the face of overwhelming public opposition.
Read the rest: Op-Ed: Health bill is malpractice
Never has the Government gone against the will of the American people in this blatant way. This clearly confirms the Neo-Feudal attitude of the New Left. They will stop at nothing to implement Obamacare, it is the way to achieve their long cherish goal of Eugenics.
Update: Obamacare House Vote likely on Sunday.
Tags: Eugenics, Neo-Feudalism
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Progressives | 119 Comments »
by Rodan ( 167 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis, Uncategorized at March 15th, 2010 - 6:30 pm
The case I have been making here on Blogmocracy that Eugenics is goal for Obamacare has been confirmed. Pro-Left Democrat Bart Stupak of Michigan has said that the reason they are pushing for abortion subsidies is because the procedure saves costs. You read that correct, The Progressives support Abortions because it is a component of Eugenics. The Left seeks to use this procedure as a way to reduce populations. Who will determine when abortions are needed? Well the answer is the Government since they will be controlling Health care.
What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue–come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”
What Stupak is hearing from his colleagues is not the pro-choice argument that the government should permit abortion as a matter of individual liberty. Rather, they claim that the government should encourage abortion as a social expedient–a cost-cutting measure.
Read the rest: ObamaCare and Eugenics
This is disturbing and no matter where one stands on the Abortion debate, this is wrong. Abortions being used for cost saving measures is criminal and anti-Human. Who will be forced to have abortion? The answer is simple, those the Progressives deem undesirable. This type of Ideology is what we fought against in WW2 and the Cold War, now that enemy is in charge.
(Hat Tip: Iron Fist)
Tags: Eugenics
Posted in Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis, Uncategorized | 167 Comments »
by Rodan ( 276 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party at March 15th, 2010 - 8:30 am
The Totalitarian Progressive controlled Democratic Party is on the ropes. They have suffered defeats for the Governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, as well as the Senate seat in Massachusetts. Current polls show them in trouble in both the 2010 Midterms for House and Senate seats. The Eugenics based Health Care plan is extremely unpopular, yet Barack Hussein Obama is pushing ahead with his agenda. The Progressives have waited 100 years for this moment to implement their Neo-Feudal agenda and they will not let this slip by. They will use or do anything to maintain power.
Democrats need to understand that an angry electorate is quite likely to turn on the party that controls all the levers of power (House, Senate and presidency). Voting out Republican incumbents will only perpetuate the status quo. That is why angry voters in 1994 and 2006 turned out only members of the majority party.
Instead of focusing legislative energy on health care, gays in the military and cap and trade, the Democrats should be laser-focused on jobs. Unemployment forms the underpinnings for voter discontent. All other problems will be exaggerated until the recession is under control because, to voters, a jobless recovery is no recovery at all. A year after passing the stimulus, Democrats own the economy in voters’ eyes.
Read more here: GOP surges, but storm could fade
The Republican Party better prepare for total war with the Democrats. The Progressives are vile and ruthless. They have no scruples and will do everything to win. If the GOP follows their typical lets be nice campaign, they will have lost an opportunity to cripple the Left. No mercy and respect is to be given the Totalitarian Progressives. They are the enemy and must be treated as such.
Tags: congress, Neo-Feudalism
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party | 276 Comments »
by Speranza ( 206 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2010 at March 12th, 2010 - 11:00 am
Normally I would agree with Dr. K’s thesis, however Obama is no mainstream Democratic politician as JFK, LBJ, and Bill Clinton were. Giving him a majority in both the House and Senate was a damn foolish thing to do.
by Charles Krauthammer
As the Afghanistan War intensifies — Marja, soon Kandahar, and the steady arrival of 30,000 new American troops — it has come to be seen as Obama’s war.
Not so. It’s become America’s war. When the former opposition party — habitually anti-war for the last four decades — adopts, reaffirms and escalates a war begun by the habitually hawkish other party, partisanship falls away, and the war becomes nationalized.
And legitimized. Do you think if John McCain, let alone George W. Bush, were president, we would not see growing demonstrations protesting our continued presence in Iraq and the escalation of Afghanistan? That we wouldn’t see a serious push in Congress to cut off funds?
Why not? Because Barack Obama is now commander in chief. The lack of opposition is not a matter of hypocrisy. It is a natural result of the rotation of power. When a party is in opposition, it opposes. That’s its job. But when it comes to power, it must govern. Easy rhetoric is over, the press of reality becomes irresistible. By necessity, it adopts some of the policies it had once denounced. And a new national consensus is born.
In this case, the anti-war party has followed the Bush endgame to a T in Iraq and has doubled down in Afghanistan. And there is no general restiveness (at least over this).
The rotation of power is the finest political instrument ever invented for the consolidation of what were once radical and deeply divisive policies. The classic example is the New Deal. Republicans railed against it for 20 years. Then Dwight Eisenhower came to power, wisely left it intact, and no serious leader since has called for its repeal.
[...]
Read the rest: In Praise of the Rotation of Power
Rich Lowry makes a point that I myself have mentioned many times. The irony being that Obama’s best hopes for reelection in 2012 would be for a GOP congress which could rein him in. Quite the conundrum!
by Rich Lowry
The undertakers of Bill Clinton’s political doom showed up in Little Rock, Ark., in 1992 for a meeting with the president-elect two months before his inauguration. They were the leaders of the Democratic Congress, and they might as well have been draped in black crepe.
“You can trust us,” House Speaker Tom Foley told Clinton, in an assurance as false as it was sincere. “We all want to make this administration succeed.”
Two years later, Clinton stood among smoldering political ruins. Democrats had lost both houses of Congress. A Republican upstart had defeated Tom Foley. In trusting the Democratic leadership in Congress, Clinton had nearly destroyed his presidency.
He learned a bitter lesson in the perils of trying to govern a center-right country in league with a left-wing Congress. It’s not an accident that the most sustained period of political success for any of the last three Democratic presidents, outside of their initial honeymoons, came after Clinton lost Congress. Only then was he forced to govern from the center.
If Pres. Barack Obama is ever going to regain the ground he’s lost as a bipartisan healer determined to transcend ideological divisions, he’ll need to have Speaker Nancy Pelosi or Majority Leader Harry Reid or both shunted back to the minority. For Obama, a Republican Congress could be a counterintuitive political boon.
[...]
Read the rest here: Obama’s Best Hope: A GOP Congress
Tags: Charles Krauthammer, Rich Lowry
Posted in Barack Obama, Elections 2010 | 206 Comments »
by Rodan ( 120 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives at March 10th, 2010 - 5:30 am
Barack Hussein Obama has transformed into one of the most divisive presidents in modern times. His pursuit of a Radical Progressive agenda has alienated Conservatives and Moderates. He has angered many on the Left as well. Obama has thrown our allies under the bus and is pursuing a 3rd World Liberation philosophy when it comes to our foreign policy. This is the Cloward-Piven strategy being implemented to fundamentally transform America into a Totalitarian Progressive regime.
WASHINGTON — Whatever the legislative fate of health reform — now in the hands of a few besieged House Democrats — the health reformers have failed in their argument. Their proposal has divided Democrats while uniting Republicans, returned American politics to well-worn ideological ruts, employed legislative tactics that smack of corruption, squandered the president’s public standing, lowered public regard for Congress to French revolutionary levels, sucked the oxygen from other agenda items, re-engaged the abortion battle, produced freaks and prodigies of nature such as a Republican senator from Massachusetts, raised questions about the continued governability of America and caused the White House chief of staff to distance himself from the president’s ambitions.
Read it here: Obama is Choosing Liberal Divisiveness
The American public have had enough of his divisive agenda. Rather than unite the nation to meet our challenges, he has divided us and pitted us against each other. This is how Progressives achieve their aims, by playing off one group against another. They will stop at nothing to accomplish their goals and the last year has been evidence of this.
Americans must unite against Obama and his Totalitarian agenda. He is in trouble politically and we must keep up the pressure.
(Picture Hat Tip: Savage)
Tags: cloward-piven, Neo-Feudalism
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives | 120 Comments »
by Speranza ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at March 9th, 2010 - 5:00 am
Wow that’s a real shocker! /not. A state that believes in individuality and personal responsibility versus a state of fruits and nuts that wants government to just take care of them. However there is an alleged rumor out there that Rick Perry is a CREATIONIST!
by Michael Barone
“Stop messing with Texas!” That was the message Gov. Rick Perry bellowed on election night as he celebrated his victory over Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison in the Republican primary for governor. In his reference to Texas’ anti-littering slogan, Perry was making a point applicable to national as well as Texas politics and addressed to Democratic politicians as well as Republicans.
His point was that the big-government policies of the Obama administration and Democratic congressional leaders are resented and fiercely opposed not just because of their dire fiscal effects but also as an intrusion on voters’ independence and ability to make decisions for themselves.
[...]
They are lessons that are particularly vivid when you contrast Texas, the nation’s second most populous state, with the most populous, California. Both were once Mexican territory, secured for the United States in the 1840s. Both have grown prodigiously over the past half-century. Both have populations that today are about one-third Hispanic.
But they differ vividly in public policy and in their economic progress — or lack of it — over the last decade. California has gone in for big government in a big way. Democrats hold big margins in the legislature largely because affluent voters in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay area favor their liberal positions on cultural issues.
Those Democratic majorities have obediently done the bidding of public employee unions to the point that state government faces huge budget deficits. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s attempt to reduce the power of the Democratic-union combine with referenda was defeated in 2005 when public employee unions poured $100 million — all originally extracted from taxpayers — into effective TV ads.
Californians have responded by leaving the state. From 2000 to 2009, the Census Bureau estimates, there has been a domestic outflow of 1,509,000 people from California — almost as many as the number of immigrants coming in. Population growth has not been above the national average and, for the first time in history, it appears that California will gain no House seats or electoral votes from the reapportionment following the 2010 census.
Read the rest here: Low-tax Texas beats big-government California
Tags: Michael Barone
Posted in Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party | 95 Comments »
by Rodan ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Progressives, Republican Party at March 7th, 2010 - 3:00 pm
When former President George W. Bush developed his Progressive Compassionate Conservative Ideology, he set up his administration for failure. As soon as he came into office, the Radical Totalitarian Progressives began non stop attacks. He became an object of ridicule and it became cool to oppose Bush. When 9/11 occurred there was a break in Bush bashing, but this did not last. After Bush’s Iraq blunder, his popularity began to decline and the Left jumped all over it. Using Alinsky style attacks, the Progressives destroyed his presidency and BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome) became a hip opinion.
Why were these attacks successful? This was due to Bush not fighting back and allowing the Left to define the terms of debate. Karl Rove admitted this was their biggest error. Why didn’t Bush fight back? He was an elitist Progressive Republican who wanted to get along with the Left since he agreed with many of their goals. This mentality is prominent with Leftist Republicans like John McCain, Lindsay Graham and even some Donors.
A prominent Evangelical figure and Republican donor says he will end his contributions to the organized Republican Party in reaction to the leaked fundraising presentation that advised using “fear” to solicit contributions and displayed an image of President Obama as the Joker from Batman.
Mark DeMoss, who heads a major Christian public relations firm in Atlanta and served as a liaison to the Evangelical community for Mitt Romney in 2008, wrote Chairman Michael Steele yesterday that he was “ashamed” of the presentation, calling depictions of Obama, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Majority Leader Harry Reid “shameful, immature and uncivil, at best.”
“I’m afraid the presentation is representative of a culture and mindset within the Republican National Committee,” DeMoss, a past member of the RNC’s “Eagle” program for top donors who gave the party $15,000 in 2008, wrote in the letter to Steele, which he shared with POLITICO. (DeMoss hasn’t given this cycle.) “Consequently, I will no longer contribute to any fundraising entity of our Party—but will contribute only to individual candidates I choose to support.”
Read the rest: RNC Fallout: ‘Ashamed’ donor closes checkbook
Mark DeMoss is the type of Compassionate Conservative who is afraid to fight the Progressives. He would rather drink tea and try to reason with the Left, rather than fight. As Glenn Beck and the Tea Parties have proven, the Progressives when attacked can’t fight effective. No mercy is to be given them since they view politics as war. People like DeMoss need to get out the way, and let those that want to fight go for victory.
Compassionate Conservatism is a failed Ideology and Republicans must reject this ideology and it’s quisling mentality.
Tags: Compassionate Conservatism, Mark DeMoss
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Progressives, Republican Party | 169 Comments »
by Rodan ( 162 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Elections, Elections 2010, Europe, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives at March 5th, 2010 - 5:00 pm
Dutch Anti-Colonialist resistance leader, Geert Wilders, made a speech to the House of Lords in Britain today. He presented his movie Fitna which shows what Islamic Imperialism is all about. Our EDL friends marched in support of Geert Wilders and to counter the Leftist-Islamic Axis. His party made gains in the Dutch Municipal elections and is posed to do well in the June Parliamentary Elections. Geert is at the forefront of European resistance to Islamic Colonization.
Below is his speech to the House of Lords.
Thank you. It is great to be back in London. And it is great that this time, I got to see more of this wonderful city than just the detention centre at Heathrow Airport.
Today I stand before you, in this extraordinary place. Indeed, this is a sacred place. This is, as Malcolm always says, the mother of all Parliaments, I am deeply humbled to have the opportunity to speak before you.
Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for your invitation and showing my film ‘Fitna’. Thank you my friends for inviting me.
I first have great news. Last Wednesday city council elections were held in the Netherlands. And for the first time my party, the Freedom Party, took part in these local elections. We participated in two cities. In Almere, one of the largest Dutch cities. And in The Hague, the third largest city; home of the government, the parliament and the queen. And, we did great! In one fell swoop my party became the largest party in Almere and the second largest party in The Hague. Great news for the Freedom Party and even better news for the people of these two beautiful cities.
And I have more good news. Two weeks ago the Dutch government collapsed. In June we will have parliamentary elections. And the future for the Freedom Party looks great. According to some polls we will become the largest party in the Netherlands. I want to be modest, but who knows, I might even be Prime Minister in a few months time!
Read it here: Speech House of Lords, London, Friday the 5th of March 2010
Here is my favorite part:
If I may quote one of my favourite American presidents: Ronald Reagan once said: “We need to act today, to preserve tomorrow”.
Geert Wilders is no Fascist, He’s a Reagan Conservative!
(Hat Tip: Delectable)
Tags: English Defense League, Freedom Party
Posted in Anti-Jihad, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Elections, Elections 2010, Europe, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives | 162 Comments »
by Speranza ( 156 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, George W. Bush, John McCain, Republican Party, Sarah Palin at March 5th, 2010 - 11:00 am
Although not an expert on Texas politics, I do recognize a Republican (think John McCain) who has spent far too much time developing Potomac fever and her name is Kay Bailey Hutchison. I am particularly glad that the author called out the Bush/Rove/Karen Hughes “new tone” strategy mentality of being gentlemen and reaching out to your opponents. I know that Rick Perry seems to have Texas’s economy in a lot better shape then most states and as far as Medina goes – that 9/11 Troofer moment on Beck’s show was a bit much.
by C. Edmund Wright
While the ever-helpful Jurassic media is trying to force-feed conservatives and Republicans groupthink analysis of Rick Perry’s thumping of Kay Bailey Hutchison (KBH), the GOP had better heed the main lesson: The “new tone” era is over.
Consider: The political team and concepts that dominated the Lone Star State just ten years ago and subsequently engineered two presidential elections just got whipped in what amounts to an intramural contest in their own state.
KBH’s incompetent primary campaign was itself a caricature of the senior senator — and it was precisely that caricature that her opponents wanted to portray. Perry and Tea Party candidate Debra Medina did not have to do much but get out of the way and let the KBH campaign prove that the senior senator and her top advisers were indeed all creatures of Washington who are hopelessly out of touch.
And for some reason, Hutchison, along with advisers Karl Rove and Karen Hughes, thought that the best way to counter this was to bring in George Bush 41, George Bush 43, and James Baker to campaign. Were John McCain, Bob Dole, and Olympia Snowe too busy to come?
Oh, and to top it off, the Hutchison campaign ads featured endorsements from the traditional liberal newspapers. Conversely, Perry brought in Sarah Palin to campaign for him and proudly addressed numerous tea party rallies.
[...]
… Remember that Rove was the architect of Bush’s “new tone” governing and communications strategy that was implemented right after Bush was declared the winner in 2000. The new tone was much like being able to “work with people.” The first new tone decision was to not even debate the national raw vote situation, a decision that still fuels anti-Republican sentiment to this day.
The bottom line is that the new tone was never called for by Americans. To think so was to be rather tone-deaf. Any strategy based on the assumption that people just could not get along — and ignores the possibility of legitimate and deep ideological divides — misses the point. By definition, the new tone more or less meant not debating your opponents very vigorously before compromising with them on almost everything.
Read the rest here: Texas-Sized Lesson: The New Tone Era Is Over
Tags: American Thinker, C. Edmund Wright, Kay Baily Hutchinson
Posted in Elections 2010, George W. Bush, John McCain, Republican Party, Sarah Palin | 156 Comments »
by Rodan ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Politics at March 4th, 2010 - 6:00 am
The Dutch Freedom Party made gains in Dutch municipal elections Wednesday. This is a sign that the Dutch have had it with Colonialists who are attempting to take over their country. The message of Geert Wilders is catching on and the Dutch Resistance to Imperialism is growing.
In the Hague, with 77% of the votes counted, Geert Wilders’ anti-immigration PVV had taken 17.5% of the vote to end in second place. Labour remained in first place with 21% of the vote.
The PVV was also set to be the biggest party in the new town of Almere. The party is only contesting the local elections in the two cities.
Read it here: Liberal parties big winners in local elections
In Europe Liberal refers to Libertarian Conservatives or the Right.
This is a precursor to the Dutch general elections in June. Let’s hope the Freedom Party wins and send a message. Europeans do not want Islamo-Imperialism.
Tags: Dutch Freedom Party
Posted in Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Geert Wilders, Islamic Invasion, Politics | 105 Comments »
by Speranza ( 248 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics at March 3rd, 2010 - 2:00 pm
Say it ain’t so! The prototypical California politcian might come back? I have seen him the past few years on television and he actually seems to have matured quite a bit – but come on! He has long sinced passed his “sell by” date and California needs to be governed on strict conservative, not New Age principles. Jerry Brown is very much a 1970’s politician but I think I know a certain blogger who would be a big Brown supporter.
by Nick Allen
Jerry Brown, 71, a Democrat, has twice before served as governor of the most populous state in the US and was nicknamed “Governor Moonbeam” after proposing that California deploy communications satellites into space.
He previously chose to live in an apartment costing $250 (£150) a month instead of the governor’s mansion. He also used to date the singer Linda Ronstadt.
Brown, who is currently the state’s attorney general, officially declared his candidacy on his website.
[...]
A January poll by the Public Policy Institute of California gave Brown a 41 per cent to 36 per cent lead over Republican Meg Whitman. His lead over Steve Poizner, another Republican candidate, was 44 per cent to 29 per cent.
Brown served two terms as governor from 1975 to 1983 and ran for the Democrat nomination for US President three times, coming second to Bill Clinton in 1992.
Read the rest here: ‘Governor Moonbeam’ could return to power in California
Tags: California, Jerry Brown, Nick Allen
Posted in Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics | 248 Comments »
by Rodan ( 200 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at March 3rd, 2010 - 11:43 am
Barack Hussein Obama showed his 3rd World Dictator colors today. In a move that would make Mugabe, Idi Amin, Castro and Hugo Chavez proud, he is going to shove his Eugenics based Health Care bill down our throats. Ignoring the polls and the election of Scott Brown in Massachusetts, he is going ahead with reconciliation. This process cuts debate and allows passage of a bill with just 51 votes. This is used only for budget purposes, not a radical transformation of our Health Care system.
WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama urged Congress Wednesday to vote “up or down” on sweeping health care legislation in the next few weeks, endorsing a plan that denies Senate Republicans the right to kill the bill by stalling with a filibuster.
“I don’t see how another year of negotiations would help. Moreover, the insurance companies aren’t starting over,” Obama said, rejecting Republican calls to begin anew on an effort to remake the health care system.
Read it here: Time to act on health care, Obama declares
If there is any doubt about the Totalitarian nature of the Progressive movement, this is evidence of it. Barack Hussein Obama is living out his childhood fantasy of being a 3rd world tyrant. The problem is – he’s doing it here in America. With more debt and more government control, Obama is making sure we become the 3rd World nation of his dreams.
Tags: Eugenics, Neo-Feudalism
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives | 200 Comments »
by Rodan ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Politics, Progressives at March 3rd, 2010 - 6:00 am
Since 2001 the Progressives have blamed George W. Bush for every ill on this planet. Bush has been blamed for earthquakes, hurricanes, September 11th, aids, cancer, plane crashes, bridges falling, snow storms, polar bears dying and every other ill imaginable to humanity. This blaming of Bush worked to elect Democrats in 2006 and 2008.
Radical totalitarian Progressive, Barack Hussein Obama, constantly blames Bush for everything. He never owns up to a problem. As recent elections have proven, this tactic is not working. Obama even blamed Bush for the Democrat’s recent losses! For the 2010 Midterms and 2012 Elections, the Progressives and Obama are planning to resort to Bush bashing in the hopes that old trick will work again.
In the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama was supposed to run against John McCain. But, early on, he decided that he’d much rather run against George W. Bush.
Obama was elected. But the campaign against Bush continues to this day. Whenever Obama gets in a tight scrape or suffers a setback or loses part of the electorate, he blames Bush.
After the voters of Massachusetts elected Republican Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate, ABC News’ George Stephanopolous asked Obama to interpret the election results.
“People are angry,” Obama responded, “and they’re frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years.”
Read it all here: Will Obama Still Be Blaming Bush in 2012? Bet on It
Progressives are really children in adult bodies. They always look for a scapegoat and when losing an argument, they name call and project like calling their opponents racist. Barack Hussein Obama is man-child who can’t handle criticism or responsibility. He throws tantrums and ends up blaming Bush for all of his failures. Rather than debate, he gets nasty and calls names. He is clearly not up for the job.
Barack Hussein Obama is the Tiger Woods and Michael Jackson of politics. He’s a man-child who grew up in a bubble and had everything handed to him. He will never claim responsibility for anything.
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Politics, Progressives | 72 Comments »
by Rodan ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Islamic Invasion, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Tranzis, UK at March 1st, 2010 - 12:00 pm
The UK, like America, has had a financial crisis. Like America, they have a Totalitarian regime that appeases the enemy of the British people while demonizing the patriotic British. UK cities have Islamic No Go zones and even Sharia law is accepted there. Unemployment is up and the people are angry about the direction of their nation. This would spell trouble for any government and it appeared to be the case a few months ago when the Tories (Conservatives) had a double digit point lead. However that has vanished to 2 points now and the current radical Progressive PM Gordon Brown may lead a Minority Government .
David Cameron, the favorite to become the U.K.’s next prime minister, has seen his commanding lead over Gordon Brown vanish. Alex Massie on how “change” has lost its magic for the Tories.
It wasn’t supposed to be like this. An exhausted Labour Party led by an unpopular, charmless prime minister whose economic policies had helped bankrupt the country was supposed to be sleepwalking to electoral disaster. Barring calamity, David Cameron’s Conservatives would win this year’s British general election and win it handsomely to boot. Suddenly, however, that’s no longer such a slam dunk. The Tories are wobbling and British politics is less predictable and more interesting than seemed possible just a couple of months ago.
A Sunday Times survey this week reported that the Tories hold just a two-point advantage and consequently, thanks to the quirks of the current constituency boundaries, Labour would, if this result were repeated in the election itself, emerge as the largest party.
Read it here: Will Britain’s Conservatives Blow it?
(more…)
Tags: David Cameron, EDL, Gordon Brown, Tories
Posted in Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Islamic Invasion, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Tranzis, UK | 133 Comments »
