Archive for the ‘Racism’ Category

54% of Texas Hispanics are Conservative

by Rodan ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Racism, Republican Party at February 24th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

The Progressive Media has been hyping that Texas will turn into a Democratic State. The basis for this assumption is the growing Hispanic population in that state. Well a new Poll comes out that throws cold water on this theory. More than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves Conservative. This doesn’t surprise me as I have encountered many of my Tejano (Hispanic Texans) cousins and they are even more Conservative than I, especially on social issues. Texas is one of those states where discussing social issues works in the GOP’s favor. This is drawing many Tejanos into the Right and rejecting the Totalitarian Progressive Movement and their attempts to enslave them.

AUSTIN – A bent to conservatism and family makes Hispanics a promising pool of votes for Republicans, but the party’s targeting of illegal immigrants has withered its attraction.

Regardless, Gov. Rick Perry has fared relatively well, perhaps because of his anti-Washington rhetoric and his careful immigration stance, a recent poll indicates.

It shows more than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves conservative, and a surprising 23 percent say they might participate in Tuesday’s GOP primary. Among those, Perry leads Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison by 2 to 1, according to the poll, commissioned by an Austin consultant for a national group of Hispanic legislative leaders.

Read the rest here: More than half of Hispanics identify as conservative, poll finds

With control of the Education system, the Left has erased the true history of Hispanics. Instead they emphasize victimhood and teach us that we are inferior to whites. Thankfully, in my case my Spaniard Grandfather taught me about the 700 year Resistance to Arab Aggression  and how for 150 year the Spanish Empire had the world by the balls. This gave me pride and lead me to reject the slave mentality that many of my fellow Hispanics have. This is why I despise Progressives, because it is personal to me. They lied about my history and view me as inferior. They only racially insult any Rightwing Hispanic like Marco Rubio, who doesn’t accept subservient status.

The article of course downplays the findings by claiming that 70% define themselves as Democrats. This doesn’t mean anything, remember the Reagan Democrats? They were White Catholics who, although Democrats, voted for Reagan in 1980 and 1984. Many switched to the GOP and their Children also vote Republican. Hispanics are no different. Contrary to the racist Progressive myth the Hispanic experience is closer to the White Catholic one, than the Black experience in America. We are an immigrant group and like all before want to achieve the American dream. The Totalitarian Progressives  don’t want Hispanics to succeed. They want us to live in Ghettos and be their serfs as they have tried to do to Blacks. Well I have news for the racist Left, it isn’t going to happen!

Bill and Melinda Gates – Racists

by snork ( 144 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Racism at February 1st, 2010 - 4:00 pm

This is even more disturbing than the money the Gates Foundation threw away on the Gaza greenhouses. This is a brief blurb from the National Policy Institute, a think tank in Augusta, GA., that, according to Wiki, describes itself as the right’s answer to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Bill Gates has made his scholarship fund off limits to white teenagers. The Gates Millennium Scholarship fund is financed by a $1 Billion endowment Bill Gates made in 1999. The fund explicitly denies eligibility to white students.

“Students are eligible to be considered for a GMS scholarship if they: Are African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander American, or Hispanic American;”

Yes, I know that there’s a such thing as the United Negro College Fund, and other such racially designated scholarships. But Mr. Gates made a point when he testified in front of congress that capitalism works because of meritocracy.

And let’s dispel one myth right now: Gates wasn’t just some middle class kid from Seattle. His father, from Harvard Law School, was a partner in Preston-Gates, one of the country’s largest and most prestigious law firms. His dad had a significant hand in growing Microsoft from a small business to a megacorporation through his contacts at IBM through Harvard. And he and Paul Allen went to a very upscale private high school where they had a minicomputer at a time when that was extremely rare. So I don’t take anything away from Mr. Gates for what he achieved, but it was hardly from a middle-class beginning.

Melinda Gates, of course, married into money. Tons of it. And she’s the moonbat of the two. This has her fingerprints all over it. Her famous accomplishments include the Microsoft Paperclip, and Microsoft Bob.

So both of these white people, living lifestyles that Roman Emperors would have killed for, want to make a scholarship available to Obama’s kids, but not Joe the plumber’s. That is racism, and the racism can’t be washed off of that. And in case it’s not completely obvious by inspection, let’s haul out the dictionary:

Main Entry: rac·ism

Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\

Function: noun

1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

This fits #2 squarely. Note also, FWIW, that criticism of the president doesn’t fit this. And it doesn’t fit a long list of other things routinely called racism, such as:

- Calling Michelle Obama a wookie.
- Calling loud, obnoxious people water buffalo.
- Criticizing criminals who are non-white.
- Criticizing politicians who want to go easy on criminals who are non-white.
- Criticizing a religion.

No, if it’s not #1, or #2, it’s not racism. And this move by the Gates Foundation is racism.

FWIW, SuSE Linux works wonderfully if you don’t need to run windows applications. And it’s free.

Hat Tip: Nevergiveup

Is International Policy On Jewish Presence In Judea & Samaria Racial Segregation?

by WrathofG-d ( 205 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Fatah, Gaza, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamists, Israel, Judaism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Palestinians, Progressives, Racism, Religion, Sharia (Islamic Law), Uncategorized, United Nations, World at December 29th, 2009 - 5:00 pm

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BLlJwLdIRpk/SFK22rL6_nI/AAAAAAAAAno/kqlxOVWco44/s1600/WhitesOnly.jpg

It seems that the more you live, the more you realize that there is nothing new under the sun. This is ever so true with the canary-in-the-coal mine of the Jewish people, and their representative on the international stage; Israel. The amount of hypocrisy, and downright injustice of the American policy (especially recently) regarding the post-1967 Jewish communities of Judea and Samaria continues to be on display to the World, and yet they continue to choose the status quo of ignorant blindness.

While the entire world, lead by our President Obama is up in arms over “illegal building” in Judea and Samaria, -even going as far as to state that it is the number one problem stumbling block regarding “Middle East” peace, they are purposefully blind to the fact that Arab/Muslim illegal building continues at a remarkable pace.


No Inspectors to Enforce Illegal Building by Arabs

Although the issue of Jewish life in Judea & Samaria is often discussed, and debated among the talking heads throughout the world, none (or at least very few) are aware or willing to admit or discuss the horrible inequality, and injustice to the present “accepted norms” with this situation.

This is surprising however as what is going on regarding the treatment of the Jews in Judea & Samaria is very familiar to the World, and especially Americans. As some have argued, the continuing double standard, and willful blindness to the violations by the Muslim/Arabs within the world and specifically Judea and Samaria and the World’s “accepted norms” regarding their final solution is in actuality nothing short than an actual Apartheid policy and the implementation of racial segregation laws against he Jewish people reminiscent to the “separate but equal”, and other famous former Civil Rights problems within the United States.

Settlement freeze is like racial segregation in U.S. (from Haaretz if you can believe it!)

Once upon a time there was a black woman; her name was Rosa Parks. There were racially discriminating laws in the United States, but she continued to sit on the bus even when she was told to vacate her seat for a white person. She was arrested, which set off a process whose end saw the abolition of racial segregation on American buses. How is it possible that one little black woman, a dressmaker by profession, could change history simply because she remained sitting? Her protest was stronger than any demonstration, op-ed piece or Knesset vote. She opted for the natural choice; that is why she was triumphant.

My family and friends were outlawed. Why? Because we are building in the Land of Israel. After all the permits and approvals, in recognized and orderly settlements in which a third generation has already been raised, we woke up one morning to the humming of drones in the sky, taking pictures of us and the situation on the ground. It is forbidden to build. Not even a storeroom. Not a kennel. In certain places, it is even forbidden to add an air conditioner.

The freeze is an edict that the public cannot tolerate. It is not democratic, nor is it humane… But at its foundation, either intentionally or by accident, is pure and basic apartheid – it is forbidden for Jews to live in certain places. It is forbidden to build. It is forbidden to develop.

This author, although admittedly not eloquent, is right as these rules apply ONLY to Jews, and the excuses by the world for such treatment, and their excuses are not much different than when the U.S. claimed “separate but equal”. Then, as is the case as well now, the situation and laws applied are anything but “equal”, and as a result of the inherent injustice with the application of the laws the “separate” part only applies to the Muslim/Arab neighborhoods, as the Jews are forced to allow Muslim/Arab building, and inclusion, where the Muslim/Arab ones aren’t. A great example of this was the 2005 Expulsion of everything Jews in Gaza without any requirements or demands on the Muslim/Arabs within Israel, or within Gaza. This horrible segregation and double standard is still present today in the complete silence about the nearly complete Islamification of Gaza by the Islamist Hamas. The international communities policy on Israel is that it force Jews living in Judea & Samaria (and then, Gaza) to halt life, be stripped of all their rights, and be expelled yet they are completely silent regarding the Arab/Muslim populations within Israel or within Judea & Samaria. Similar to pre-Civil Rights America, the policies are directed at curtailing the existence of one racial group at the preference of another. In the U.S., the Black communities rights were curtailed while the Whites were given free reign.

In the context of Islamist doctrine (Sharia Law), the Caliphate, and dhimmihood, none of this really is surprising. As the Koran instructs, the Muslims are to have the superior (white/Muslim) role in society, and the infidel/dhimmi (Black/Jew) the inferior. The double standard and racial segregation methods of the presently used “peace process” where Muslims can live where ever they wish, build whatever they wish, and practice their religion openly and freely, but the Jews of Judea & Samaria cannot, only bolsters this understanding.

Further bolstering the argument that what we see today against the Jews of Judea & Samaria is nothing less than racial segregation are the stats as provided by the CIA Fact Book regarding the population of Gaza, Judea & Samaria, and Israel where Israel has a large minority of cultures, religions, ethnicities, and languages while Gaza and Judea & Samaria are nearly 100% “palestinian arab” and “Muslim” only.

There is a bit of irony to the fact that our President, raised in a Black Liberation Church, and who happens to identify with his Black heritage would be the leader of the new international Klan which has at its core -consciously or unconsciously – policies of racial segregation and our generations own “separate but equal” treatment but on an international scale.

The Balkan Problem, Part 1

by coldwarrior ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islamists, Racism, Religion, Serbia at December 29th, 2009 - 12:00 pm

Several times on Blogmocracy, the actions of the Serbs in the FYRs (former Yugoslav Republics) have come up for discussion. What is lacking in these discussions is the background, history, and ethnic tension that underlies the actions. This post will attempt to clarify how a culture of Serbian Orthodox Christians can end up as war criminals. What drives civilized men to massacre? This is part one in a series. Next, Did the US and NATO pick the wrong side in the Yugoslavian Wars?

Serbie_Serbia_Srbija_Dusan_by_Boban_Markovic

The above map is for the 1st Serbian Empire in the late 1300’s. Do note the proximity of Serbia from Constantinople and Rome, between the Muslim Ummah and Western Christian Europe. Keep the geography in mind when considering the animosity between Roman Catholics, Muslims, and Orthodox Christians. The geography is at the crossroads of three religions and is in the path of later Muslim Expansion from what is now Turkey.

The Serbs, as a civilization, have occupied the area of what is now Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, and Bulgaria. By 825 A.D. Serbs are fully converted to Christianity. Over the next generations, Serbia becomes folded into the Eastern Empire of Byzantium. In 1054 the problems begin, the East West Schism between the Roman/Western Catholic Church and Byzantine/Eastern Orthodox Church. The Serbs choose the Orthodox version due to Byzantine pressure while the coastal areas choose the Roman version because of pressure from Venice.

By 1463, the Ottoman Turks (Muslims) take Serbia. For the Next 400 years, the areas of Serbia is a violent area full of intrigue, assassinations, and war between East and West. The land changes hands many times and the population migrates back and forth following any safety that can be found. It is in this period that the Slavs in Bosnia Herzegovina convert to Sunni Islam instead of fighting the Ottoman occupation. In 1766, the Ottomans abolish the Serbian Orthodox Church and subjugate it to Constantinople, and Southern Serbia is colonized by Albanian and Turkish Muslims, uprooting the traditional Serb Orthodox populace.

The stage is set for continued conflict in the 20th Century. The Croatian Catholics are backed by Rome, the Bosnian Muslims are backed by Turkey and then heavily by Iran, the Serbian Orthodox are backed by Russia.

Events of WWII then set the stage for the Serbian actions in the 1990’s. The ethnic/religious splits listed above were exploited by Hitler when his armies invaded Yugoslavia. Hitler found willing allies in the Albanian, Kosovar, and Bosnian Muslims which were openly supported by the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini and Croatian Catholics led by the Pope in Rome and the Nazi Puppet leader of Croatia Ante Pavelic. The Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini was a famous anti-Semite. He preached that the Muslims in Yugoslavia should join the 13th Handschar Waffen SS division and the Muslim Albanians should join the 21st Skanderbeg Waffen SS Division, these same divisions would be implicated and found guilty of war crimes such as murder, ethnic cleansing, rape, forced migration against the Orthodox Serbs.

The Catholic Church, through blessings and cooperation from Rome and the active participation of the clergy, especially the Franciscan order in Croatia, were directly responsible for total support of the creation of Ante Pavelic’s fanatical Catholic Ustashe. The end result is ethnic cleansing of Orthodox Serbs and the creation of the Jasenovac Concentration Camp in Croatia, staffed by Ustashe of both Catholic and Muslim religions were responsible for 750,000 Serbs, 60,000 Jews, and 25,000 Gypsies murdered. Yes murdered, not killed in war, murdered in a concentration camp so that the expanded Greater Croatian State could be for Catholics and Muslims only. More people were murdered in the Jasenovac Concentration Camp than died in actual war in Yugoslavia. Pope John-Paul II apologized for this atrocity in 1997.

During the later half of the 20th Century, Yugoslavia, which contained Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Vojvodina, and Kosovo, with all of its ethnic and religious differences is brought under one state by Josip Broz Tito, former leader of the Socialist ‘Partisans’ who fought the Nazi occupiers in WWII. He was able to keep the peace by squashing, violently at times, any hint of nationalism that would occasionally pop up. His leadership by force and personality could not survive his death.

After Tito dies in 1980, Yugoslavia starts to fall apart. The old ethinic hatred is brought right back up to the surface, by the 1990’s war occurs again. Alija Izetbegovic becomes president of Bosnia-Herzegovina. He is the connection to WWII. He was a recruiter for the SS Handschar division and collaborated with the ABWER and GESPTAPO to send Serbs to Jasenovac Concentration Camp. In 1970 he published the Islamic Declaration, where he argues for Sharia law and the creation of an Iranian style Muslim Republic in Bosnia. He also received massive funding from Iran to become president of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Bosnian and Kosovar Serbs become the victims of ethnic hatred and clashed with Muslims and Croatian Catholics. The poor economic condition of the erea at the time helped fuel the fire. Meanwhile, in Croatia, Fanjo Tudjman publicly denies the extent of the Massacre of the Serbs in WWII. This causes fear in the 13% Serbian population in Croatia. War in Croatia breaks out in 1990. The Orthodox Serbs in Croatia fear for their lives and property. Given the history, who can blame them? By 1992, Bosnia-Herzegovina, led by Izedbegovic and backed by Croatia and Iran and other Muslim countries is at war against the Serbs in both Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia proper.

By 1995, the Serbs have the upper hand and allow the anger of the atrocities against them from WWII all the way back to 1054 to get the best of them and the Srebrenica Massacre occurs in July of 1995, 8,000 mostly men are murdered. The Army of the Republic of Serbia and the paramilitary group Scorpions are responsible, I cant say if it was out of revenge for Jasenovac, or out of fear, or both.

For some reason, the caterwauling Christian Amanpour and the rest of the CNN/BBC crew never really bothered to explain to the American people why this massacre occurred. It is as if the Serbs acted in a vacuum, the approximately 800,000 total murders never happened. According to the press and the Clinton State Dept history in the Balkans started with Milosevic in 1988, the history from the above was never discussed; Izedbegovic was an innocent peacemaker, Croatia had never done anything wrong.  Yes the Serb Army and Scorpions should not have done what they did in Srebrenica, but they did not act in a vacuum without any history.

End of part 1.

The Johnson – Racist, or Malthusian?

by snork ( 306 Comments › )
Filed under Abortion, Blogwars, Global Warming Hoax, LGF, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Racism, Socialism, Tranzis at December 20th, 2009 - 7:00 pm

Over at Bite Me! comix, finally a conventional post. It’s titled: “Charles Johnson – Racist”. The gist of it is that in a post showing what Manhattan looked like in the 17th century, Mr. Johnson said the following:

National Geographic strips away the skyscrapers, the traffic, and the humans, and visualizes the island of Manhattan in the early years of the 17th century.

He seems to be suggesting that American Indians aren’t humans. I have a different take on it. In the radical environmental movement, “excess humans” is a standard talking point. They routinely talk about “excess humans” just like normal sane people talk about termites. Something to be exterminated.

I’m going to give Mr. Johnson the benefit of the doubt, and attribute this to carelessness, when he left the word “excess” off. He didn’t mean to imply that American Indians aren’t humans, he meant to imply that there are simply too many humans on earth, and we need to eliminate most of them.

Such as when he said that aborting black Africans is a good way to fight global warming.

Racism, or old-fashioned Malthusianism? You decide. Either way, the minorities end up taking it in the shorts for white man’s screwy ideas.

The Joys of Being Banned at Liberty Forest

by Rodan ( 163 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Racism at December 14th, 2009 - 2:00 pm

Blogmocracy In Action

Guest Blogger: elyakatz


I have had the unmitigated pleasure of being banned from Liberty Forest, a website which purports to promote the ideology of the Libertarian Party, and specifically, the agenda of Dr. Ron Paul and his son, Dr. Rand Paul. Turns out however, it is a haven for antisemites. What a feather in my cap.

Those who come to the site with sympathy towards the State of Israel, Jews or Judaism had better walk softly. Any itty bitty sign of rudeness will be noticed and quickly censured by either JoshLowry (Admin) or the moderators. Awhile back, I had decided I was going to leave the forum permanently on post number 777. I have better things to do with my time.

My candid views of these people  earned me a place in the banned pile. No matter. I have saved every single thread I participated in. My words, and theirs are preserved for my future reference.

The main reason I chose to stick around, even after discovering how tolerated Jew haters are, and how intolerant they are of having that fact pointed out, was because arguing, even with antisemites, tends to solidify my own learning. I guess I have a heretofore undiscovered learning style: Arguing. My mother has been telling me this for years. And years. She is a worn out woman. A saint even.

After listening to one of my favorite rabbis tell off an antisemite who called him to insult him, I decided it was okay to insult antisemites, as long as there is incontrovertible evidence that they are indeed antisemites and not just innocently uninformed.

I do not excuse Dr. Paul in this matter either. I emailed his official site and told him about what was going on, since his name appears as a part of the  site’s name. I figured his campaign people would care that this sort of vitriol was being spewed at a site with his name.

I was wrong. And disappointed, because I was an enthusiastic Ron Paul supporter during his run for President. I do believe the Federal Reserve is a problem. I just don’t happen to believe the problem of the Federal Reserve is a part of some vast, evil  Zionist conspiracy. On the contrary, I believe the Jewish state, and Jews will be among the first victims if world governance, (the Federal Reserve is a part of this whole thing) ever comes into being.

To be fair, the vast majority of members at Liberty Forest are probably genuine believers in small government, returning to the constitution, ridding the American people of the chain and ball called the Federal Reserve etc. etc. etc. Things many Americans know must change if we are to retain and regain our freedoms. The problem with the site is the free reign the antisemites have…all in the name of “freedom of speech” according to one moderator who’s handle is Cowlesy. I think I spelled that correctly.

(more…)

Liberals are racists? Say it ain’t so, Tony!

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Leftists, Progressives, Racism at December 9th, 2009 - 12:47 pm

Did anyone see Football Night in America Sunday night and hear former Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy’s comments about race and racism being a factor in colleges’ not hiring black head football coaches?

And who is it that runs these racist institutions of higher learning that won’t hire blacks to be their head football coaches?

Why, it’s liberals, of course!

Those same all-caring and compassionate liberals who claim to to care about the plight of minorities and save them from us evil conservatives and republicans!

Of course, we all know that’s a crock of crap. Leftists are the true racists who think blacks can’t survive without the liberal to give them their monthly welfare check, government housing, or give them an education using disciminatory affirmative action laws. Here’s a letter to the editor he wrote in the New York Times-

Diversity Everywhere but the Sidelines

By TONY DUNGY
Tampa, Fla.

IN the last month, we witnessed the inauguration of our first African-American president and also saw Mike Tomlin of the Pittsburgh Steelers become the second African-American head coach to lead his team to a Super Bowl win. The fact that there was very little talk of Tomlin’s race in the week leading up to the game suggests just how much progress has been made in terms of black men in leadership positions in the N.F.L.

February is also the month that high school football players choose the colleges they will attend in the fall. While it’s an exciting day for those seniors, it’s a disappointing day for me. You see, many of those players who choose the top schools are African-American and yet almost none of them will get the opportunity to play for an African-American head coach. Of 120 teams in the N.C.A.A.’s Bowl Subdivision, the top tier of play, only seven have black head coaches.

One would think that our universities would be leading the way in progressive thinking. You wouldn’t think that in 2009 it would be more likely for an African-American to become president of the United States than to be hired as head coach of a top-20 football program. But that seems to be the case.

Over the past decade I’ve been contacted by many universities who were looking for head coaches. I’ve recommended African-American coaches including Herm Edwards, Lovie Smith, Mike Tomlin, Ron Meeks and Leslie Frazier — men with great leadership skills and great track records in the N.F.L. None was hired, and rarely did they even get interviewed by those universities.

With the progress that has been made in terms of diversity in politics, in other collegiate sports and in professional football — Edwards, Smith and Tomlin all got top jobs in the N.F.L. — why is college football hiring so far behind? At a seminar last spring in Indianapolis with other N.F.L. and college head coaches and university athletic directors, I asked that very question, and was enlightened by the responses of those directors. The biggest factor, they said, was the involvement of other people associated with the universities. It was not just the president and the athletic director who made the hiring decisions — alumni and boosters were involved, and the presidents often felt pressure to hire coaches the boosters would support.

That appears to be the biggest difference between the N.F.L. and the N.C.A.A. in hiring practices. While a university president may have to appease alumni, Dan Rooney, the owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers, can hire someone like Tomlin without having to consult anyone else.

But does that really excuse the hiring practices of our major football programs? Shouldn’t minority students be able to see role models of diverse leadership at the college level? How long should we give a pass to these institutions that should be at the forefront of diversity?

Read the rest here

An Example of Racialism

by Rodan ( 266 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Racism at December 8th, 2009 - 7:07 pm

Radical Progressive writer, Eugene Robinson, wrote one of the most racist articles I have ever read. He basically calls Tiger Woods a race traitor because he is attracted to slim, white women. To begin with Tiger Woods isn’t black. He’s a combination of different ethnic groups. He has a right to choose the women he wants. Now his cheating ways I don’t approve of but his selection of women…

Leave Tiger alone. Enough with the puns — we get that he’s really just a “cheetah” in disguise. Enough with the Barbie-of-the-Day revelations — we get that he’s attracted to a certain type. Enough with the whole thing — we have far more important things to worry about.

Yeah, right. Sit down with a friend over lunch and try to have a conversation about health care, climate change, financial regulation or Afghanistan without straying at least once onto the oh-so-unimportant subject of Tiger Woods’s philandering. I’ve given up trying to deny that the unfolding saga is compelling, even if paying attention leaves me feeling a bit disappointed in myself. Prurient interest is rarely something to be proud of.

Read the rest.

Eugene Robinson clearly has a Racialist view. He feels Tiger Woods should keep it real and stick to black women. This is a very ridiculous attitude to have in this day and age. I’m attracted to Russian/Ukrainian women, does that make me a traitor to Latins? Well all of you know how proud I am about my heritage. It’s about a personal preferences for whom they partner with.

Progressives believe in keeping people in a straight jacket. Their Totalitarianism extends even into people’s choices for partners. This is another example of the tyrannical nature of this vile movement.

Has Iran’s Supreme Leader Disappeared?

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 160 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Iran, Islamists, Leftists, Nuclear Weapons, Progressives, Racism at December 8th, 2009 - 2:00 pm

(Israelnationalnews.com) An underground Iranian activist has told Israel National News that the country’s highest official — Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei — was spirited to a “secret place” for his own safety and that the nation’s religious leaders are “scared.” The source – an activist in the global Iranian pro-democracy movement who is involved in assisting a group of some 30,000 students located in Tehran and several other major cities – said Khamenei has disappeared. It is the Supreme Leader who controls Iran’s foreign policy, and specifically its decisions regarding its nuclear development activities.

“I am told that Khamenei was taken to a secret place to monitor the situation and perhaps for his safety, and a helicopter was ready with a pilot in it to perhaps fly him out to Russia if the situation got out of hand,” the source told Israel National News on Tuesday. “I am also told that prominent clergy went to meet with him hoping to force him to show leniency…. [Our consensus] is that [the] mullahs are scared.”

Foreign journalists were once again banned, phone networks cut and Internet connections spotty at best as government forces tried to put the lid back on the growing unrest that again broke out during special observances on Monday.

The demonstrations, planned months in advance, were held on the nation’s annual observance of the deaths of three students during anti-American riots in 1953, a day known in Iran as “16 Azar” — December 7 on the secular calendar. It is a day that has “bitter memories for Iranians,” according to the activist, who explained that the Shah’s army had opened fire and killed students on that day.

Basij militia and police officers wielded batons and fired tear gas at demonstrators in Tehran who continue to protest what they contend was the rigged re-election in June of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They also accuse the government of silencing academic freedom.

“16 Azar” ceremonies were held in all universities across Kurdestan and the suburbs, according to an Iranian blogger who reported that some 700 protesters gathered at Kurdestan University alone, singing anti-government songs, waving signs (“Death to dictator”) and chanting slogans. At least 400 demonstrators did the same at Payam eh Noor University, as did a similar number at Sanandaj Azad University.

“Demonstrators’ spirits were high,” said the activist. “Frankly, I was nervous, since all communications systems were down, and [I was] afraid of a bloody massacre. But the turnout was great when [the] cities of Kerman, Shahr Kord and especially Esfahan came out en masse and confronted the Basij,” he related.

Basij ‘Very Very Sorry’ — or Not?
“Students and most people participating were emboldened since there was confusion among the military, secret service and Basij,” said the source. “Many Basij called [Persian-language] radio stations [outside Iran] over the phone and apologized to the people of Iran, crying for having beaten demonstrators under Khamenei’s orders,” he said. “They said that they were told demonstrators were anti-Islam and Western-paid troublemakers, but now they — the Basij — are finding out that they have been told a lie by the mullahs and were very, very sorry for beating their own countrymen.

Read the rest here

Harry Reid Uses Slavery to slander Obamacare Opponents

by Rodan ( 54 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Healthcare, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Racism at December 7th, 2009 - 1:42 pm

The Radical Totalitarian Progressive Leader of the Senate Harry Reid has played the race card. He claims the opponents of Obamacare would support Slavery. This shows the desperation of the Left and how their agenda is in trouble. Obama’s popularity is down and the trend is not good. Therefore, they will use their Alinsky tactics to smear the American resistance.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago.

Read the rest.

Here is the video clip.

Nice try there Harry, just one problem. It was the Republicans who were against slavery and the Democrats supported it. The truth doesn’t matter, Progressives are ruthless and will use any tactics. We must continue to hammer them without mercy. It’s a political war and we will prevail.

(Hat Tip: Snork)

Hypocritical Racist Progressive Cesspool Website: VDARE

by Rodan ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Racism at November 28th, 2009 - 1:00 pm

There is a vile Racist Progressive National Socialist website called VDARE. Although they are labeled Rightwing and some Conservatives cross post articles, it is not on our side. They are openly White National Socialists who hate all Non White Immigrants, regardless of Culture. They were founded by one of the biggest and  Ultimate Hypocrites: Peter Brimelow. This vile Racist Vermin is not an American by birth, he was born in the UK. Here is a foreigner telling us Native born Americans not to let anyone else in. Well Peter, in your case I would love to have denied your entry here and you can take a ship or plane back to your homeland. Here is one of his recent hypocritical 2 face articles.

Yawn. The conspicuous absence from these “myriad ways to accelerate job growth”: an immigration moratorium–stemming the flood of 150,000 legal immigrants who enter the US job market every month.

Read the vileness here.

Peter is a Progressives of the Race based National Socialist variety and a fake. What gives this refugee a right to say others can’t come to America? Immigrants are not to blame for our economic issues, it’s our Progressive economic policies that caused this mess. Mr. Brimelow should have no credibility in his anti-Immigrant rantings, he was not born here and is no different than others coming here. I say deport Racist Refugees like this clown! Peter go back to your country and man up by resisting the Islamo-Imperialist Colonization there. You will not because like all Progressives you are a coward!

Another Racist Progressive hypocrite is a clown that I despise, Pat Buchanan. This White National Socialist advocates Progressive economic policies and is an anti-Semite. In a more recent article of his at the Racisl Leftist website VDARE, he compares Mexicans to Islamo-Imperialist colonialists.

And, yet, we are surprised by ethnic espionage in our midst, the cursing of America from mosques in our cities, the news that Somali immigrants are going home to fight our Somali allies, and that illegal aliens march under Mexican flags to demand American citizenship.

Read his garbage here.

Hey Pat, Mexicans are part of the civilization you come from. They come from the Latin-Catholic Branch of Western Civilization and within a generation integrate into America. Mexican-Americans have fought and died in many wars for the United States like any other group. Oh and Pat some of them Mexicans may even be your relatives, so the jokes on you! Hey did your parents or grandparents ever tell you of the racism towards Irish Immigrants? Does No Irish need apply ring a bell, you vile creature? You are no Conservative but a Racist Progressive of the White National Socialist Variety.

VDARE is not a friend of the Right, it is a National Socialist Progressive website that is advocates many of the same positions as the rest of the Progressive Movement. They are Leftwing Racists and I have no respect for them. Oh and if people think I’m turning into Charles “Icarus” Johnson and engaging in a Nazi witch hunt, you are wrong. I am a Libertarian leaning Conservative that believes in Borders, Language and Culture. These impostors don’t believe in that, they believe in the supremacy of Races which is not an American value. VDARE is anti-American like any Progressive website.

Update: British Racist Refugee Peter Brimelow openly admits his Leftist White National Socialist views and alliances.

Now I will boldly go etc. We also publish on VDARE.COM a few writers, for example Jared Taylor, whom I would regard as “white nationalist, in the sense that they aim to defend the interests of American whites. They are not white supremacists. They do not advocate violence. They are rational and civil. They brush their teeth. But they unashamedly work for their people—exactly as La Raza works for Latinos and the  Anti-Defamation League works for Jews.

Get used to it. As immigration policy drives whites into a minority, this type of interest-group “white nationalism” will inexorably increase.

Read it here.

Peter Brimelow is a Racist Anti-American Refugee condemned in his own words. This clown should be deported because we don’t need his garbage in America, We have enough Trash here we need to get rid of.

Left or Right: Where One Truly Is In The Political Spectrum

by m ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Racism at November 19th, 2009 - 6:36 am

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Morgan

On this blog, bringing up the issue of fascists and socialists and where they are in the political spectrum is borderline overkill, if not plain and simple overkill already. I myself have already written about the subject on this blog. However, this is something I believe needs to be said.

Fascists (a.k.a. Nazis) have usually been labeled as right-wing and socialists (a.k.a. Marxists, Stalinists, Communists, Trotskyists, Leninists, you get the idea) have been regarded as left-wing. Rodan, among others elsewhere in the Internet, has presented the arguments that fascists and socialists share very few differences. Looking at the stances the fascists and the socialists hold on the issues we contemplate over today, at the methods employed by both sides when they were (in some cases, are) in power, and at the goals both sides have sought, I agree with Rodan on his contention.

The one real difference between the fascists and the socialists is how they describe their ideology. The fascists describe their “struggle” along the lines of nationalism and racism, while the socialists describe theirs along the lines of societal classes. The ideological difference is there, but is so minor compared to everything else about both sides, it’s a cosmetic difference. It is also a difference which doesn’t differentiate where the two sides are on the American political spectrum.

The best way to prove both sides are left-wing in nature is to ask yourself this question: Where do they stand on the roles of the individual and the state in society? Based solely on the writings and spoken words of Hitler, Marx and Lenin, they contended the state is greater than the individual; the individual serves the state, and the state is paramount in all things. My own opinion of what constitutes a left-winger or a right-winger is this: if you believe the individual serves the state, you are a left-winger; if you believe the state serves the individual, you are a right-winger.

Those who call themselves “democratic socialists” will doubtless say the state serves the individual and vice versa, but their idea of the size of the roles of the state and the individual should play in society still makes them left-wingers in my opinion. Our Founding Fathers had some choice words to say about the role of the state and the individual in American society, and what the democratic socialists envision for American society lies in the middle between what our Founders envisioned and what Marx envisioned; it lies between the midpoint and the far left point of the spectrum.

Those who claim the fascists are right-wing cite racism as the reason, as if being racist is one of the symptoms of being far-right. I don’t buy that crap. Racism is a part of bigotry, bigotry is an evil, and evil (in whatever form) transcends groups. Race, ethnicity, age, sex, nationality, religion; there’s always at least one bigot in every group. To use any form of bigotry as a factor in deciding one’s political location is misleading.

Calling Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, VDARE, the BNP, Vlaams Belang, Stormfront and others racists or bigots or just crazy is one thing (whether you’re wrong or not depends on the individual or group in question), but if you want to know whether they are right-wing or left-wing, ask them what they think is the role of the individual and the role of the state in society. If their answer isn’t crystal clear, look at where they stand on the issues and discern how it affects the individual. There’s no other way, in my opinion, to decide one’s place in the political spectrum.

(cross-posted @ Morgan’s 2 cents)

NY Muslims: To Hell With America and Democracy!

by m ( 285 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Multiculturalism, Racism at October 27th, 2009 - 10:00 am

Blatant Anti-Americanism and hatred from a “peaceful muslim”,
brought to light by Black and Right (Oct. 26):

NY Muslims: To Hell With America and Democracy!
Younus Abdullah Muhammad continues to do us a favor and speak the ugly truth about Islam.
That Islam calls for the hatred of everything that does not coincide with Islam.

(thanks to melinwy for the link!)

Progressive Racism against Hispanic farmers

by Rodan ( 255 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Racism, Tranzis at October 14th, 2009 - 2:10 pm

The American Progressive Movement is racialist and racist at it’s core. They believe that Blacks and Hispanics are helpless victims who can’t succeed with without the help of Enlightened White Progressives. They have smeared Those on the Right that preach Individualism and self reliance as racists. In reality it is the American Left that is racist, just like their German Progressive Cousins were 70 years ago. As a Hispanic, I can testify that the most racist people I have met are White Progressives.

In a blatant example of Progressive Racism, a judge ordered the water turned off for Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This has crippled the farmers, many of whom are Hispanic and has caused loss of jobs and loss of Food productions. Former Democrat, turned Republican and comedian Paul Rodriguez is leading the protest against this. His family owns a farm in the San Joaquin Vally and they will be affected. He lobbied Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to no effect. Clearly this is done for Racial reasons. The Obama Administration would rather please White Progressive Environmentalists than help out Hispanic farmers.

Paul Rodriguez

Paul Rodriguez wants water – and he’s angry enough to get some

One wouldn’t immediately associate comedian and actor Paul Rodriguez with a serious issue such as water.  But, as Mark Twain said: “Whiskey is for drinking; water is for fighting over.”

Rodriguez is so concerned about water that he helped create the California Latino Water Coalition, led marches with several thousand people in recent weeks, and spoke Saturday night to a convention of the conservative California Republican Assembly in Bakersfield.  I addressed the convention goers about my U.S. Senate run against Barbara Boxer just before Rodriguez’ turn at the podium.

What has Rodriguez’ concerned to spark political action is the shutdown of water pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.  These pumps move water from California’s wet north to the agricultural Central Valley and urban Southern California.   A judge’s ruling switched the pumps off over a controversial U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report that declared a fish, the delta smelt, threatened.  No one really knows if turning the pumps off will help the fish, but most can agree that California’s agricultural industry will take a big hit this year due to lack of water.

Rodriguez and his family own farmland in the Central Valley where, as the comedian said Saturday night, “We grow the sweetest oranges and sourest lemons.” But now, because of a judge’s ruling, the most fertile land on “this blue marble” will lie fallow.  People will be out of work.  Less food will be grown.  And farmer and farm worker alike will be hurt.

Rodriguez had notes at the podium but didn’t refer to them as he spoke for 40 minutes, presenting a potent alternating mix of passion, humor, and fact.  He recalled using his talent to help many prominent Democrats raise money only to have every one of them turn him a deaf ear when he asked them for assistance over the water issue.  “What are they afraid of,” he asked, “fish can’t vote.”

Read the rest.

Paul Rodriguez asks a very good question, “What are they afraid of?” He has discovered that the Progressive controlled Democratic party views Hispanics as their inferior vassals. When it comes to the interest of Hispanic farmers vs. White Environmentalist, the vassals must back down to their masters. This attitude caused Rodriguez to flip to the Republicans after seeing they don’t care about Hispanic farmers.

Rodriguez also has advise to the GOP in regards of Media and RINO calls of moving away from Social Conservatism.

And in contrast to much of the mainstream media’s habit of encouraging Republicans to moderate on social issues, he suggested that the Republican party’s conservative positions on issues like abortion and family values would be an advantage in attracting Hispanic voters. Rodriguez: “You need to attract more of me, or else you’d be an endangered species. … You know, we have so much in common. A lot of the values that this party espouses, we espouse. We believe strongly in family. We believe life is sacred.”

He is spot on, the GOP should not sell out to please the Media or Progressives. What the GOP should do is take advantage of this situation and have Paul Rodriguez as a spokesman to the Hispanic Community. He has seen Progressive Racism first hand and would be a great voice to show Latins, who the real racists are!

Conservatives/Libertarians must use the Race card Card against the Progressives. The achilles heel of the Left is their elitist Racist attitude and it should be exploited.

Below is a clip of Rodriguez on Hannity.

Update: song_and_dance_man makes a valid point.

Not only are the progressives racist, they are biased for taking into consideration the concerns of fish over their fellow human beings.
Now how exactly does one find what the fish really want? Their whole premise is flawed and the progressives use issues like these to promote their various whack job special interest groups as in this case the Environmental lobby.
These are the same people who save baby seals but have no problem with terminating the life of an unborn human.
They are totally reprobate and no better than animals that kill or eat their young.

Progressives hate Humans!

The Amnesty Race Card

by tqcincinnatus ( 286 Comments › )
Filed under Healthcare, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Racism at September 22nd, 2009 - 5:00 am

More from the right-wing nut over at Renew America,

Why is this the case? Because, as we all know, those on the Left are singularly inept when it comes to being able to marshal facts and logic and reason in support of their arguments and policy positions. It’s much easier — and likely much more emotionally satisfying to boot — for those on the Left to simply fall back on rank emotionalism. Few things invoke emotion more than the thought that somebody might hate or want to harm somebody else — or maybe hate and want to harm ME! — all because of an uncontrollable factor such as what the color of their skin is or where their ancestors are from. Race is the perfect vehicle for those who want to obfuscate discussion and get around uncomfortable facts that destroy their arguments. Which is, of course, why those on the Left and in the Democrat Party talk about race so much. In a sense, it’s the last refuge of the intellectually improficient scoundrel.

You can bet your bottom dollar that once amnesty gets firmly ensconced as a provision of the general Obamacare package, you will see this race card played, just as it was with the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court. Opposition to the bill(s) will be cast as “racism.” The “racism” argument will be used to shepherd the bill through Congress against the public’s wishes, while suppressing what little vocal Republican opposition there has been to Obamacare to date. Though pushing for amnesty may seem like madness, it has a method to it. As a result, this may end up being make-or-break time for conservatives. The Left can only scream “racism” so many times before the charge simply has no force any more. I, for one, eagerly await the day when calling someone a “racist” has about as much meaning or effect as calling someone a “free silverite.” Will this health care monstrosity, with the amnesty monstrosity attached, be what finally drives Middle America to simply decided that we don’t care whether we’re called racists anymore, we’re going to do what’s right, regardless?

Read the whole thing.  I hope I’m wrong, and that I don’t have to make another one of those “I told you so” posts.