► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

A Christian backlash brews in Africa

by Speranza ( 200 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Islam, Religion at July 19th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

I am happy to read that Christianity in Africa is not going  to lay down and play dead to the Islamic Imperialists. Of course the Muslims will throw the term “Crusade” around  forgetting that the Crusades were a counter attack directed against centuries of Islamic imperialism.

by Ralph Peters

The Islamists have it wrong: Islam isn’t the world’s fastest-growing religion. By birth numbers and convert tallies, it’s Christianity.

And Africa’s at the forefront — a fact that going to body-slam Muslim extremists sooner or later.

The bombings that recently butchered World Cup fans in Uganda were just the latest in a long line of crazed attacks on African Christians by Islamist fanatics. In the central states of Nigeria — Africa’s most-populous country — religious pogroms and counter-pogroms between Muslims and Christians have become routine.

In Kenya, al Shabaab terrorists from neighboring Somalia stir up trouble and make grotesque threats. And we all know what bestial acts Sudan’s Islamist government has perpetrated against black Christians over the decades.

Throughout the region, patience is wearing thin. Africa’s impassioned forms of charismatic and Pentecostal Christianity won’t turn the other cheek forever. The coming backlash could be ferocious (even dictatorships could exploit a vengeful popular mood).

The Islamist imperialists pushing to expand in Africa would do well to recall that Christianity has historical claims on such states as Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Are they ready for mass violence aimed at a rollback? Or state conflicts?

[...]

As far as converts go, Muslims are being baptized (at great personal risk), but Christians aren’t converting to Islam. Wahhabi Islam’s rejection of joy just doesn’t speak to Africans — who even in misfortune seem incomparably alive.

Throughout sub-Saharan Africa, the old mysticism of folk religion glides easily into charismatic Christianity, but collides head-on with the intolerance of Wahhabism.

Read the rest:The coming Crusade

► Hot Links

Fired for his Catholic beliefs

by Speranza ( 60 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Political Correctness at July 10th, 2010 - 11:00 am

Can you imagine this happening to any other group in America? A professor at the University of Illinois has been fired for admitting that he accepts his church’s teachings on homosexuality after some student file a complaint against him. Of course if were a Muslim and admitted that he accepted theKoran’s teachings on everything, nobody would dare say a word. Anti-Catholicism is the  last accepted bigotry in America. What about all the English Literature professors who feel the need to inject their personal politics into their lectures?

The University of Illinois has fired an adjunct professor who taught courses on Catholicism after a student accused the instructor of engaging in hate speech by saying he agrees with the church’s teaching that homosexual sex is immoral.

The professor, Ken Howell of Champaign, said his firing violates his academic freedom. He also lost his job at an on-campus Catholic center.

Howell, who taught Introduction to Catholicism and Modern Catholic Thought, says he was fired at the end of the spring semester after sending an e-mail explaining some Catholic beliefs to his students preparing for an exam.

“Natural Moral Law says that Morality must be a response to REALITY,” he wrote in the e-mail. “In other words, sexual acts are only appropriate for people who are complementary, not the same.”

An unidentified student sent an e-mail to religion department head Robert McKim on May 13, calling Howell’s e-mail “hate speech.” The student claimed to be a friend of the offended student. The writer said in the e-mail that his friend wanted to remain anonymous.

“Teaching a student about the tenets of a religion is one thing,” the student wrote. “Declaring that homosexual acts violate the natural laws of man is another.”

Cary Nelson, president of the American Association of University Professors, said professors should be able to tell students their own views and even argue in favor of them, provided students can disagree without being penalized

Howell said he was teaching his students about the Catholic understanding of natural moral law.

“My responsibility on teaching a class on Catholicism is to teach what the Catholic Church teaches,” Howell said in an interview with The News-Gazette in Champaign. “I have always made it very, very clear to my students they are never required to believe what I’m teaching and they’ll never be judged on that.”

Howell also said he makes clear to his students that he’s Catholic and that he believes the church views that he teaches.

McKim referred questions to university spokeswoman Robin Kaler, who said she couldn’t comment on Howell or his firing because it’s a personnel issue.

According to the university’s Academic Staff Handbook, faculty “are entitled to freedom in the classroom in developing and discussing according to their areas of competence the subjects that they are assigned.”

Read the rest: University of Illinois instructor fired over Catholic beliefs

► Hot Links

The Methodist Church in England’s moral blindness

by Speranza ( 171 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Israel, UK at July 7th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Instead of worrying about the decline in membership of their church in Britain and the growing Islamization of British society and culture,  the Methodists boycott no other country in the  world but the Jewish one. There is a moral perversity going on in the Mother Country that shows no sign of abating. The British Methodists (and the Religious Left elsewhere) as Robin Shepard points out -  ought to realize that boycotts can go both ways and if they own any property in Jerusalem or in Galilee, well nationalization is always an option (or should be) as well as taxing their churches and expelling their missionaries.

by Robin Shepard

The decision last week by the Methodist Church of Britain to launch a boycott against goods emanating from settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem will send a shiver down the spine of anyone with a feel for where the rancid, global campaign against the Jewish state is currently heading.

The boycott will involve transactions of the church itself, and extends to encouraging all affiliated Methodists to follow suit. The Methodists boycott no other country.

The fact that an institution professing allegiance to values of love, truth and justice should have succumbed to an agenda of hatred, hypocrisy and barbarism is sadly emblematic of the degraded spirit of our times, and of the moral inversions which blow through them.

But who, these days, can really be surprised about such happenings in modern Europe? It is only the banality, to appropriate Hannah Arendt, of this particular evil that still has the power to shock us. For, in watching the discussions at the Methodist Conference which approved the boycott, there was little in the way of the visceral hatred of Israel which we have become so accustomed to seeing in academic settings or in the trade unions. Here was a group of almost stereotypically ordinary, middle-class, English Christians calmly reciting every hackneyed anti-Israeli calumny in the book.

“What is happening in Palestine today is what was happening in South Africa in the recent past,” one delegate said. Another spoke of the “66 percent of 9- to 12-month-old babies [that] are anemic in Gaza.”

[...]

I DID not have the pleasure of talking to the Rev. Carter, who would certainly reject any suggestion of wrongdoing, let alone that he had taken his church down the road to bigotry. But I did speak to the Methodist Church’s head of media relations, Anna Drew, whose well prepared brief offered a lesson in where things have gone so badly wrong.

“Do you have any boycotts of other countries in the world, Saudi Arabia for example, where Christianity is banned?” I asked.

“Almost certainly not,” she said.

“So why have you singled out the Jewish state?” I asked.

[...]

If the Methodist Church is to launch a boycott of Israel, let Israel respond in kind: Ban their officials from entering; deport their missionaries; block their funds; close down their offices; and tax their churches.

If it’s war, it’s war. The aggressor must pay a price.

Read the rest The banality of Methodist evil

► Hot Links

Saturday Lecture Series: Prof Weber lectures on Early Christianity and the Judiasm of that Era

by coldwarrior ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Christianity, History, Judaism, Open thread, Religion, saturday lecture series at June 26th, 2010 - 8:30 am

This morning, get your coffee and walk back into the UCLA lecture hall where Prof Eugen Weber’s Lectures on Early Christianity in the Roman Empire ,(you may to follow the links out to  the video). Roman culture begins to fail, the Stoics lose their grip over the ruling class. The people in these hard times look for ‘salous’- the health of the soul aka: salvation instead of the ascetic rationality of stoicism that valued virtue, wisdom, and strength. The more the disorder in the Empire  grew the less relevant rationality was.

Meanwhile, the Hellenistic and  Jewish influence act on Early Christianity while Christianity grows and  acts to change the  contemporary world from 100-400AD.

Do feel free to get caught back up if you missed the earlier lectures on the Rise of Rome and the Engineering of Rome.  Professor Weber ‘s main point is that Early Christianity spread despite contempt and persecution from Rome.

► Hot Links

Johnny Hart’s OpEd Slam

by Bunk X ( 181 Comments › )
Filed under Art, CAIR, Censorship, Christianity, Dhimmitude, Free Speech, Humor, Islamists, Open thread, Political Correctness, Politics, Religion at May 20th, 2010 - 10:30 pm

While perusing the internest on “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” I stumbled upon a story I’d missed from 2003.  Apparently Johnny Hart (1931-2007) had voiced his coded opinion in his long-running strip “B.C.” and garnered complaints from CAIR and others.

The cartoon, which appeared Nov. 10 [2003] in more than 1,200 newspapers worldwide—including The Washington Post—shows a caveman entering an outhouse at night, and then saying, from inside, “Is it just me, or does it stink in here?” … [T]he cartoon contained six crescent moons—three in the sky, and three on the outhouse door—and wondered if this might have been a veiled slur on the world’s 1 billion practicing Muslims. … [An email] noted that Hart had drawn a prominent sound effect—”SLAM”—between two frames to accompany the closing of the outhouse door. The SLAM was stacked vertically, in the shape of an I, and could be seen to signify “Islam.” The cartoon appeared on the 15th day of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month.

The Washington Post asked six well-known cartoonists—all admirers of Johnny Hart—to look at the strip. Most said they had no idea what the joke was supposed to be. When the religious interpretation was suggested, five of the six thought it was probably right, even given Hart’s denial. “It’s highly, overwhelmingly, incontrovertibly suspicious,” said Berkeley Breathed, creator of “Bloom County” and the new Sunday-only strip “Opus.” “There’s no explanation for that gag without Islam. It’s meaningless.”

“That vertical SLAM is completely unnecessary to whatever surface gag is there,” said Jef Mallett, creator of the nationally syndicated cartoon “Frazz.” The cartoon would work equally well, and far more efficiently, Mallett said, without the prominent sound effect. “And other than the excuse to add three more crescents, there was no need to set the scene at night.”

Kathleen Parker added:

In answer to the question he posed in “B.C.,” it’s not the outhouse that stinks. It’s our virtuous “sensitivity” and the demand for tolerance by the manifestly intolerant that reeks.

Image from here, quotation from here, both found via link from here, and this is an Overnight Open Thread.

► Hot Links

Christian Zionists — Why They Really Support Israel

by Eliana ( 155 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Israel at May 13th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

Christian Zionists are often accused by the left of having ulterior motives for supporting Israel.

Pastor John C. Hagee has written an article in the Jewish Daily Forward newspaper about the importance of Christian support for Israel and the real reasons behind it:

On May 23, pastors, ministers and priests at more than 1,500 churches in all 50 states and over 50 foreign countries will dedicate their Sunday services to teaching the importance of Christian support for Israel.

On that day — the second annual Christians United for Israel Sunday — church leaders will speak to their congregants about God’s enduring covenant with Abraham and the Jewish people, including God’s promise in Genesis 12:3 that He will bless those who bless Israel. Worshippers will learn about the tragedies of Jewish history. Christian leaders will speak the truth about our culpability and silence during the Holocaust, pogroms and Crusades. The message at churches around the world will be clear and unequivocal: Christians can never again be silent in the face of threats to the Jewish people.

Christians attending these churches will also learn about the miraculous rise of the modern State of Israel and the existential threats it faces today. Many will leave church with a better understanding of the dangers of Iran’s nuclear weapons program, Palestinian terror and the international campaign against Israel’s legitimacy.

Why Christian Zionists Really Support Israel

John C. Hagee directly addresses the charges made most frequently about Christian Zionism being an attempt to hasten Biblical prophecies:

Like all people of faith, we Christians firmly believe that our religion is true. But we also believe in religious freedom and have enormous respect for the Jewish faith. The first rule adopted by Christians United for Israel was that there would be no proselytizing at our events. CUFI exists only to honor and support the Jewish people, never to convert them.

Regarding the other allegation, the fact is that the vast majority of Christian Zionists and Evangelicals do not believe there is anything we can do to hasten the second coming of Jesus. Our theology is clear that we humans are utterly powerless to change God’s timetable. Yes, like many Jews we do believe that the creation of Israel was the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. And like our Jewish friends we also search the Scriptures to understand what may come next in God’s plans for His creation. But since we are powerless to change these plans, our motives for standing with Israel come from elsewhere.

So what’s the real reason for Christian support for Israel?

Christian support for Israel starts with the Bible, is strengthened by an understanding of history and endures because of the Judeo-Christian commitment to democratic values. Everything that forms the Christian understanding of the world leads to the same conclusion: Christians should support Israel because it is simply the right thing to do.

American Christian support for Israel is more crucial than ever in the days of Obama. Many thanks to our Christian friends for your support for Israel and the Jewish people!

HAT TIP: Carl in Jerusalem

► Hot Links

Dhimmitude U.K. style

by Speranza ( 196 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Political Correctness, Religion, UK at May 13th, 2010 - 1:00 pm

Well it’s come to this. A U.K. Catholic school girl is now labeled a truant because she refuses to wear a head scarf on a compulsory visit to a Liverpool Mosque. (Frankly the only places in Liverpool probably worth visiting would be Beatles sites like the Cavern Club, but I digress.) We all know that the Church of England led by the  incompetent and politically correct Archbishop Rowan Williams, is  a bunch of wobbly cowards but I hope that the Roman Catholic church in England is made of sterner stuff.

hat tip – Weasel Zippers

by James Tozer

A Roman Catholic schoolgirl has been labelled a truant after she refused to wear a headscarf during a compulsory trip to a mosque.

Amy Owen, 14, and fellow girl pupils at a Catholic secondary school were told to cover their heads and wear trousers or leggings out of respect for their Muslim hosts.

But when her mother objected, saying she did not want her daughter to ‘dress as a Muslim’, she received a sternly worded warning letter from the headmaster saying she had no choice.

Peter Lee, head of Ellesmere Port Catholic High School in Cheshire, informed her that the local diocese ‘requires’ pupils to have an understanding of other religions.

In the letter – with words in block capitals and underlined – Mr Lee said the visit was ‘as compulsory as a geography field trip’.

He added: ‘There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.

Read the rest Catholic School girl who refused headscarf for Mosque trip labelled a truant

► Hot Links

15 Nigerian Christian Farmers killed by Islamic Imperialists

by Rodan ( 159 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Media at April 20th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

In the last month, two raids by Islamic Imperialists have left a total of fifteen Nigerians dead. The world media says nothing because in the Tranzi Progressive narrative Christians are inferior humans. If Muslims are killed it’s called genocide and the world must do something about it. Americans are getting sick of this propaganda and their sympathy factor with Muslims is very low.

KANO, Nigeria — Two Christian farmers were killed Monday and two others went missing in fresh attacks by suspected Muslim-Fulani nomads in Nigeria’s central Plateau State, police and residents said.

The Fulani nomads allegedly attacked the farmers who were working on their farms ahead of the rainy season in Christian-dominated Riyom village, 30 kilometres (18 miles) south of Jos, capital of the volatile state.

An overnight attack on the village last month by marauding Fulani nomads claimed 13 lives while a dozen houses were burnt

Read the rest: Two Christian farmers slain in Nigeria: police

No one in the media cares about this. If it was Muslim being attacked, Barack Hussein Obama would be ordering air strikes and the media would be reporting this on a massive scale. When Christians, Jews, Hindus and others are killed, it’s just terrorism. When Muslims are killed its genocide and the world must stop. Americans are sick of this double standard.

(Hat Tip: Weasel Zippers)

► Hot Links

Alan Dershowitz defends the Catholic Church

by Rodan ( 263 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Religion, Tranzis at April 13th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

This article really warms my heart. Alan Dershowitz writes a great defense of the Catholic Church, which is currently under assault by Tranzi Progressives forces. This is the second such great defense of my church by a Jew and what is especially amazing, one who is a Liberal Democrat. It is obvious that the current attacks are emanating from the same sources that despise Israel. Obviously Alan Dershowitz gets the big picture and rather than throw us under the bus in revenge for the history of blood between the Catholic Church and Jews, he comes out with a strong defense.

Having criticized particular Catholic cardinals for blaming everything–including the Church’s sex scandal–on “the Jews”, let me now come to the defense of the Pope and of the Church itself on this issue.  To begin with, this is an extraordinarily complex problem, because the Church has at least five important traditions that make it difficult to move quickly and aggressively in response to complaints of abuse.

The first tradition involves confidentiality, particularly not exclusively the confidentiality of the priest with regard to the penitent.  But there is also a wider spread tradition of confidentiality within the Church hierarchy itself.

Second, there is the tradition of forgiveness.  Those of us outside the Church often think, perhaps, that the Church goes too far in forgiving.  I was shocked when the previous Pope immediately forgave the man who tried to assassinate him.  But this episode and other demonstrate that the tradition of forgiveness is all too real.

Read the rest: In Defense of the Pope

The Child abuse scandal is wrong and the Church did drop the ball on it. That said, the attacks on the Catholic Church have nothing to do with the scandal. It is an attempt by the Tranzi Progressives to destroy a pillar of Judeo-Christian/Roman-Greco Civilization. Alan Dershowitz sees the big picture and rather than dwell on historical grievances, he stands for what is right. Anti-Catholicism is just a despicable form of bigotry like Anti-Semitism. Unfortunately, Catholic bashing is acceptable in American society and it’s time to confront this bigotry.

Mr. Dershowitz sums it up perfectly here.

Most important, this tragedy should not be used as an excuse to attack a large and revered institution that does much good throughout the world.  Blame must be placed with precision and praise should be given with precision as well.  The eleventh Commandment, Thou Shalt Not Stereotype, must never be forgotten.

Thank you Alan, for coming to our defense in our time of need!

(Hat Tip: Iron Fist)

Update: The House Pope Benedict was born in was vanadalized. This is another example of howAnti-Catholicism is acceptable in society.

Update II: Addition by Speranza

Although I appreciated his support during the Iraq war, Christopher Hitchens (just like “Snowball” who turns 57 today), reverts to his Trotskyite and/or left wing past. There has been an attempt to target Israeli politicians and military personnel with arrest in Great Britain but as many have warned in the past, this “universal jurisdiction” will go a “bridge to far” one day. Let’s see them try the “universal jurisdiction” against Ahmadinejad.

by Robin Shepard

If I have said it once, I have said it a hundred times. The one great hope for those of us calling for sanity over the state of Israel in particular and the western world in general is that the group hysteria that inspires our opponents will ultimately render them so ridiculous that they will lose all credibility outside the lunatic fringe.

Well, vindication may be just around the corner. Now it emerges that the universal jurisdiction laws that have been used to effectively exclude prominent Israelis from Great Britain for fear of war crimes indictments may be used to launch a prosecution against, wait for it, the Pope.

This is not a theoretical idea. Two prominent atheist writers, Richard Dawkins (author of The God Delusion) and Christopher Hitchens, announced over the weekend that they are consulting lawyers with a view to prosecuting His Holiness when he comes to Britain in September. Charges, being considered by high profile human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC, would relate to Pope Benedict’s alleged cover up of abuses by paedophilic priests. The alleged cover up is said to amount to a crime against humanity. If, on that basis, a prosecution is launched the universal jurisdiction procedures would provide the route to do it.

Where to start? Perhaps firstly by pointing out that any such prosecution could (and probably would) be taken by Catholics around the world as a declaration of war against them by a Protestant judicial system. (The Queen is the titular head of the Anglican church and also of the English courts).

Apart from anything else, this would thus amount to an abrogation of the Peace of Westphalia — the treaties which followed the Thirty Years war (1618-1648) and which sought to bring an end to religious conflict across Europe.

[...]

If Stephens is right, what this all means is that the universal jurisdiction laws are almost certain to be amended beyond recognition in the very near future since the mere possibility they could see the Pope hauled before a British court is something the UK authorities will swiftly move to forestall.

[...]

Read the rest here: The U.K. “Universal Jurisdiction” insanity continues

► Hot Links

Happy Easter Sunday To All of You

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 67 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, History, Religion at April 4th, 2010 - 4:25 am

It’s not about baskets filled with candy, fuzzy cute bunnies or colored eggs…It’s about the resurrection of Jesus.

► Hot Links

Easter and Eggs

by Bunk X ( 128 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Christianity, History, Open thread, Religion at April 3rd, 2010 - 8:30 pm

easter_pysanka1.jpg

The History of the Easter Egg:

To keep a Christian perspective of Easter in your home, please note the following research that can help you explain the history of the Easter egg to your children.

The earliest Christian history of the Easter egg tradition is found approximately 50 years after Jesus’ resurrection. Bright red-colored eggs were simply exchanged as gifts as a symbol of continuing life and Christ’s resurrection. The red color was an intentional Christian tradition commemorating the blood of Christ. The red Easter eggs in Christian history were originally used when two friends met on Easter day. The two friends would know to tap their eggs together and one would greet the other with the words, “Christ is Risen!” and the other would respond, “Christ is Risen Indeed!” Then the eggs were eaten in fellowship.

In the Reformation years, the church instituted the custom of breaking the Lenten fast with hard-boiled eggs. The eggs were brought to the Easter morning service, and the priest blessed them saying, “Lord, bless these eggs as a wholesome substance, eaten in thankfulness on account of the resurrection of our Lord.”

Our main focus must always be that our children meet Jesus in a personal way. If an Easter egg will bring Jesus alive to a child as a symbolic illustration, we should rejoice in the revelation of Jesus and his Resurrection to our children!

[History of the Easter Egg from here, image from here, and previously posted here.]

This is an open thread for all the reverent, as well as for heathens like myself.

► Hot Links

Remembering John Paul II

by m ( 86 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Christianity, Guest Post, Religion at April 2nd, 2010 - 4:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: MTC!


I’ve never written a blog post before. I hope you like this one.

April second marks the fifth anniversary of Pope John Paul II’s death. He died after a lon bout with Parkinson’s disease. He was beloved around the world and some of his greatest contributions were toward the end of his life. He practiced what he preached; simply by remaining in office, he gave hope to the marginalized of society as well as hope to the physically challenged.

I had the pleasure of seeing him at Yankee Stadium in 1979. It was magical. When he drove around the stadium in the popemobile, I could feel the presence of God. There was an electricity in the air and his vestments were whiter than white. He seemed to be extraordinary yet he was also very ordinary. He seemed to be the type one could sit down with and have a normal conversation.

The greatest tribute I heard after he died was when I asked one of the developmentally disabled adults I had worked with what made her sad about the Pope’s death.

She said, “He was my friend.”

I think that sums it up nicely. Also, the fifth anniversary of Pope Benedict’s election is coming up on April 19th. He was elected on his 78th birthday; I guess the cardinals wanted to give him a present he would never forget!

Lately, he has been hammered by the press for the Vatican’s response to the abuse of children in the Church. I have tried to make heads or tails out of it. The Anchoress’s blog has a lot of good links and so does www.wdtprs.com by Father Z. There is a greater agenda at work here. The Pope came into office with an undeservedly bad reputation. As the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he was the Church’s chief theologian. He was thought to be rigid (not true). His nicknames were God’s Rottweiler and Der Panzerkardinal. He was the one who sent the abusive German priest away when he was Archbishop of Munich. He also took charge of investiating abusive priests starting in 2001. Once he saw how slow the process was for removing abusers, he did his best to speed things up. Unfortunately, he wasn’t always able to move as fast as he would like.

The Vatican is very hierarchical; only the Pope can make a final decision about a priest. Pope Benedict thinks that the best cure for abusive priests is to keep gay men out of the seminary as well as tighter standards for admission. He is the first Pope to meet with abuse victims and, shortly before his election, he called on the Church to get rid of the “filth”. This campaign, in the MSM and in certain blogs, to call for his abdication is just an excuse to bring down someone they don’t like. “We want another John Paul”, they say but they forget that they didn’t care for his ideas either. The Achoress, among others, thinks that if this papacy is ruined, it would be damaging to the church. The liberals can’t tolerate someone who thinks life begins at conception and it really burns them that Pope Paul’s encyclical Humanae Vitae is correct. Pope Benedict also advocates improved worship and sticking with an all-male priesthood. So for this Easter season, let’s remember Pope John Paul II and pray for Pope Benedict XVI.

Maybe we could share some of our memories of John Paul II

-mtc

► Hot Links

Where Do Jews and Christians on the Left Get Their Values?

by Speranza ( 109 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Judaism, Progressives, Religion, Tranzis at April 1st, 2010 - 3:30 pm

Dennis Prager makes a good point that for  Leftist Jews and Christians , their real  religion is Leftism.  In their warped values system, Leftist values are not in any conflict with their Jewish or Christian values. This allows them therefore to vote for an Obama who is not exactly a great friend of the Jews (or Christians).

by Dennis Prager

Many Americans find it difficult to understand why Jews on the Left — including many who would call themselves “liberal” rather than “Left” — continued to enthusiastically support President Obama after the revelations about the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish views of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the religious mentor and close friend of Obama. This confusion is all the greater now that Obama has humiliated the prime minister of Israel and created the most tense moment in American-Israel relations in memory.

Likewise, many Americans wonder how Democratic congressmen who claim to be faithful Catholics and are pro-life could vote for the health care bill that allows for federal funding of abortions — after opposing it up to the last day.

There is an explanation.

Leftism, though secular, must be understood as a religion (which is why I have begun capitalizing it). The Leftist value system’s hold on its adherents is as strong as the hold Christianity, Judaism and Islam have on their adherents. Nancy Pelosi’s belief in expanding the government’s role in American life, and therefore her passion for the health care bill, is as strong as a pro-life Christian’s belief in the sanctity of the life of the unborn.

Given the religious nature and the emotional power of Leftist values, Jews and Christians on the Left often derive their values from the Left more than from their religion.

Now, of course, most Leftist Jews and Christians will counter that Leftist values cannot trump their religion’s values because Leftist values are identical to their religion’s values. But this argument only reinforces my argument that Leftism has conquered the Christianity and the Judaism of Leftist Christians and Jews. If there is no difference between Leftist moral values and those of Judaism or Christianity, then Christianity is little more than Leftism with “Jesus” rhetoric added, and Judaism is Leftism with Jewish terms — such as “Tikkun Olam” (“repairing the world”) and “Prophetic values” — added.

But if Christianity is, morally speaking, really Leftism, why didn’t Catholics or Protestants assert these values prior to 19th-century European Leftism? And, if Judaism is essentially a set of Left-wing values, does that mean that the Torah and the Talmud are Leftist documents? Or are the two pillars of Judaism generally wrong?

More questions:

Why are almost no Christians and Jews who believe that God is the author of the Bible (or, in the case of Jews, the Torah) on the Left?

Why are so few pro-life Catholic and Protestant Christians on the Left? Do they not care about “the poor”?

Of course, that is what people on the Left believe. As former head of the Democratic Party Howard Dean said, “Our moral values, in contradistinction to the Republicans, is, we don’t think kids ought to go to bed hungry at night.”

They believe such things despite the fact that traditional Protestants and Catholics have created more institutions to take care of the sick and needy than probably any other groups in the world. And despite the fact that religious Americans give more charity and volunteer more time than secular Americans do.

Read the rest

► Hot Links

Pauley says…

by m ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Open thread at March 29th, 2010 - 8:30 am

Pauley the Patriot

► Hot Links

The Feasts of St. Joseph

by Bunk X ( 240 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Communism, Democratic Party, Healthcare, Politics, Progressives, Religion at March 20th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

On Friday 19 March 2010, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi invoked a prayer to St. Joseph for help in passing the Health Care debacle. Not being Catholic, I couldn’t remember who he was the patron saint of besides children’s aspirin, so I decided to check Wikipuddlia.

Here’s the entry for St. Joseph:

Further down, under Sainthood, we find this:

Here’s the pertinent paragraph enlarged.

Now click on that image. It’s on Wikipedia, so it’s got to be true… heh. My initial reaction was that some wag edited the Wiki for fun, BUT WAIT! IT’S TRUE!

From The Washington Times:

Seeking to shore up support for her embattled health bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today announced it was the feast of Saint Joseph the Worker, adding “We pray to Saint Joseph to benefit the workers of America which is what our health bill would do.”

Problem is, March 19 is indeed the feast day of Saint Joseph, foster-father of Jesus. But the actual feast of St. Joseph the Worker (same man, two ways of commemorating him) comes in six weeks. Set for May 1, it was introduced by Pope Pius XII in 1955 to counteract May Day, the high holiday for communist and socialist workers.

So, Wikipedia is right, Nancy blew it twice in one fell swoop, and Joe Biden’s disease is contagious.

[Crossposted here.]

Update 3:42PM: This doesn’t look good.

[Source for Odds of Healthcare Passage as of 20 March 2010 here.]

► Hot Links