Remember all those Gazans, who are touted by the world press as being in “dire economic straits” due to the blockade imposed by Israel? Yep! They’re in such dire economic straits, they’ve gone ahead and opened yet another shopping facility full of goods imported from:
• France! (No surprise there.)
• Turkey! (Imagine that!)
• The United States! (No doubt, courtesy of الرئيس أوباما and the Demo☭rats.)

More photos here.
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if this place were open 24/7? Such is the hypocrisy of the MSM and the Paleostinians.
NOTE TO IDF: Please schedule an after-hours Grand Opening DEMOLITION!
Archive for the ‘France’ Category
Gaza, Under Siege, Opens New Luxury Mall
by Macker ( 76 Comments › )Filed under France, Gaza, Hamas, Islamic hypocrisy, Palestinians, Turkey at July 21st, 2010 - 11:30 am
D-Day 6 June 1944 – Remember Always
by Bunk X ( 106 Comments › )Filed under American Supremacy, Europe, France, Germany, History, Holocaust, Military, World War II at June 6th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

Today, 6 June, is Memorial Day in South Korea and National Day in Sweden.
But more importantly, it is the Anniversary of the 1944 Normandy Invasion of Nazi-held France, commonly referred to as D-Day. There were many D-Days and H-Hours, but most folks remember this one.
God bless the brave and the fallen, who selflessly pulled it off with honor… on our behalf.
Last year, my friend and veteran Amy Oops posted this:
The News & Advance
Published: June 5, 2009Sixty-five years ago today, June 5, close to 350,000 Allied troops were massed in the south of England, poised to launch the largest land and sea invasion in world history. The target? Nazi-occupied Europe. The ultimate goal? The utter destruction of Adolf Hitler’s murderous regime.
On June 6 — D-Day — more than 150,000 soldiers stormed the beaches of Normandy, backed up by close to 200,000 personnel on warships pounding the German defenders. Wave after wave of landing crafts pushed toward Omaha, Utah, Sword, Gold and Juno beaches.
The return fire was so withering, some troops were killed before they could even hit the water; others died the minute they set foot on the beach. Survivors have said the water churned blood-red that day and the sand was mud, not from water, but from the blood of dead and dying troops.
Scholars and researchers with the National D-Day Memorial Foundation in Bedford, after years of painstaking research, have compiled the most accurate listing of the number of Allied soldiers who died that day: 2,499 American troops and 1,915 other Allied soldiers for a total of 4,414 in just 24 hours.
In the late 1990s, D-Day veteran Bob Slaughter took it upon himself to raise some sort of memorial in his hometown of Roanoke to honor the local D-Day vets. In short order, the idea morphed into a grand-scale commemoration of all D-Day veterans that would be erected in Bedford, the community that had the highest per-capita death rate of local soldiers on that fateful day.
Within months after its June 6, 2001, dedication, the federal government was investigating the fundraising tactics of the foundation’s then-director, Robert Burrows; after two mistrials, prosecutors dropped all charges. The foundation, millions of dollars in debt due to a rushed construction schedule, went into bankruptcy reorganization soon thereafter.
Still, the memorial has drawn hundreds of thousands of tourists, many of them World War II and D-Day veterans. Yet today, the nonprofit foundation that operates the site is in very real danger of closing in the not-too-distant future. A drop in donations and the recession have hit the foundation hard.
This week, U.S. Sen. Mark Warner and Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Fifth District, introduced legislation in Congress for the National Park Service to assume control of the site.
We wish them luck. This memorial belongs not just to all free people … everywhere.
It’s a reminder that the freedoms we enjoy today come at a high cost.
A very high cost.
Addendum by Bob in Breckenridge:
D-Day: Operations Neptune and Overlord, 6 June 1944
As most of you know, 66 years ago today approximately 59,000 brave American soldiers, along with thousands of brave British and Canadian soldiers, stormed the beaches of Normandy, France. Casualties were horrific: Over 6000 American G.I.’s were killed or wounded the first day, and there were over 3,700 British and Canadian casualties. The Normandy American Cemetery contains the graves of 9,387 Americans who were killed that first day and in the weeks thereafter…One of the best reenactments of the first wave of Americans to storm Omaha beach was in Steven Spielberg’s great 1998 movie “Saving Private Ryan”. The first three videos are the opening half hour of the movie, depicting the battle on Omaha beach. The entire movie is on youtube (in sixteen 10 minute clips). Parts 4 through 16 can be seen by clicking here. The last touching video is of an 86 year old American veteran of the invasion who is visiting the Normandy American cemetery with his son and grandchild when they are met by some French people who are and always have been extremely grateful for the sacrifices that brave young Americans made for France during the 20th century. U.S Army D-Day battle video and interviews with the soldiers who participated in the invasion can be seen at the U.S. Army’s D-Day website. BTW, the “D” in D-day did not stand for decision. It didn’t stand for anything.
► Hot LinksFaith in the EU is fading rapidly – reality bites!
by Speranza ( 58 Comments › )Filed under Europe, France, Germany at May 16th, 2010 - 3:00 pm
I thought that Angela Merkel had a lot more common sense then to help bail out European social welfare basket case Greece. That would be something that I would expect her predecessor Gerhard Schroder would do. The whole European Union experiment was a Franco-German-Belgian plot to take over Europe through political entrapment. The idea that nations of different languages, cultures, and histories would bond together into one super state is against the laws of history. I for one would not be saddened to see the EU (a bunch of trouble makers in my opinion) fall on its face. The last two Europeans (from France and Germany – what a coincidence!) who tried to unite Europe by force were Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler (and both of their dreams ended in the snows of Russia).
by Peter Millar
GISELA and Susi, thirtysomething civil service secretaries, were shivering over their sausages in what the tabloids labelled the “most miserable May of the millennium” and planning their summer holidays. “I know where I’m not going,” one of them said. “The hotels, service and food aren’t as good as Turkey but the prices are as high as Italy!”
As Berliners bravely sat on the banks of the River Spree in unseasonably cold weather for the Ascension Day holiday that traditionally marks the start of summer, they had no doubt that the cold wind was blowing from the sunny south: Greece in particular.
The multi-billion-euro payout for Greece, followed by an even more expensive rescue package for the threatened single currency, has created the greatest political climate change in a generation.
Suddenly Germans are asking questions about the European project that has been the bedrock of their politics for 60 years, leaving Angela Merkel, the chancellor, under fire from the electorate, the opposition and her own party.
[...]
The tension between Germany and France threatened to spill over at a Brussels summit last weekend when Merkel and Sarkozy had a furious row. According to observers, it ended with Sarkozy threatening to leave the euro.
“It was a stand-up argument,” an official told El Pais, the Spanish newspaper. Sarkozy, furious at Merkel’s reluctance to sign up to a safety net of €750 billion (£644 billion), was shouting and bawling at Merkel and smashed his fist on the table. “It was Sarkozy on steroids,” one witness said.
Dubbed “our Iron Lady” — or just “Mutti” (Mummy) within the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) that she dominates — Merkel returned to Germany accused of having given too much, too late.
Her timing was also poor. The euro talks, combined with the Greek bailout, led to a CDU defeat in North Rhine-Westphalia’s state election last weekend and with it the loss of her majority in the upper house.
Read the rest: ‘Mummy’ Merkel battered as Germans lose face in the EU
George Will finally has an interesting column and on the same subject
by George F. Will
When Chancellor Angela Merkel decided that Germany would pay part of Greece’s bills, voters punished her party in elections in Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia. How appropriate.
The 1648 Peace of Westphalia, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, ratified Europe’s emerging system of nation-states. Since the end of the Thirty-One Years’ War (1914-1945), European elites have worked at neutering Europe’s nationalities. Greece’s debt crisis reveals this project’s intractable contradictions, and the fragility of Western Europe’s postwar social model — omniprovident welfare states lacking limiting principles.
Greece represents a perverse aspiration — a society with (in the words of Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan) “more takers than makers,” more people taking benefits from government than there are people making goods and services that produce the social surplus that funds government. By socializing the consequences of Greece’s misgovernment, Europe has become the world’s leading producer of a toxic product — moral hazard. The dishonesty and indiscipline of a nation with 2.6% of the eurozone’s economic product have moved nations with the other 97.4% — and the United States and the International Monetary Fund — to say, essentially: The consequences of such vices cannot be quarantined, so we are all hostages to one another and hence no nation will be allowed to sink beneath the weight of its recklessness.
Recklessness will proliferate.
“The coining of money,” said William Blackstone more than two centuries ago, “is in all states the act of the sovereign power.”
Read the rest here: Folly of the ‘Euro’ state
► Hot LinksSeventy years ago today (May 10, 1940) in Western Europe
by Speranza ( 154 Comments › )Filed under Europe, France, Germany, Progressives, UK, World War II at May 10th, 2010 - 7:00 pm
Seventy years ago today, Friday May 10, 1940, Nazi Germany launched its long awaited attack in the West. Attacking neutral Holland (using paratroopers) and Belgium, German Army Group A started a diversionary attack (referred to as “the Matadors cape”) through the Low Countries and into North Eastern France. The very best of the Allied armies (the British Expeditionary Force, The French 1st and 7th Armies as well as the French armored cavalry corps ) went forward to meet them just as the Germans planned. However the main German thrust was by Army Group B and went through the Ardennes forest which was considered impassable for tanks. Passing through the impassable Ardennes (and with no allied air attacks on their long stretched out columns) , the Nazis (in which a virtually unknown at the time commander of the 7th panzer division – called the ghost division because they moved so fast- named Erwin Rommel greatly distinguished himself) crossed the Meuse River near Sedan and Dinant on May 13 and then instead of attacking Paris, they swung northeast in a great scythe to cut off the Allied armies fighting in Belgium. Eventually the allies retreated to Dunkirk where the British were miraculously able to evacuate 337,000 British and French troops to England. After regrouping, the Germans then swung South to rout the remainder of the French Army and Paris was occupied on June 14. Eventually France capitulated on June 25, 1940 (being forced to sign the armistice in the same railway car in which French Marshal Foch made the Germans sign their armistice on November 11, 1918). The Maginot Line was never attacked but was merely encircled by German Army Group C. On May 10th another momentous event happened – fed up with the pathetic leadership of Neville Chamberlain as well as being mortified over the failures of the Norwegian campaign, Winston Churchill took over as Prime Minister. As poor as Churchill was as a military strategist, he was brilliant as a political leader and he and he alone, kept Britain still on board in the fight against Hitler until June 22, 1941 when Hitler attacked the USSR and December 11, 1941 when Germany declared war against the United States. Sad to say but there are no more Churchill’s in Britain (Maggie Thatcher was the last) and certainly we cannot look to the White House for Churchill type of leadership. Today, Britain and the rest of the democracies of the world are facing threats from an enemy who while not nearly as competent as Nazi Germany, are just as determined to conquer.
Note – there are a lot of myths concerning the Nazi attack on the West
The Germans had overwhelming superiority in manpower.
False – the allied forces of France, Britain, Belgium and Holland outnumbered the Germans (who had to leave 30 divisions in Poland to keep an eye on the U.S.S.R as well as 7 divisions in Norway).
The Germans had an overwhelming superiority in tanks.
False – the allies had more and better tanks. The Germans however used them in masse at critical points in order to achieve a substantial numerical advantage at critical points.
The Germans dominated the battlefield.
False – the vast majority (90%) of the German army (the same with the allies) was composed of infantry divisions. Where the French and the British infantry divisions went up against German infantry divisions, they held their own. The key factor was the Nazi concentrated use of tanks combined with air support.
The French Army was poor.
False- the individual French solder was good (and the best French soldiers were the Algerian, Moroccan, Vietnamese, and Senegalese colonials who fought brilliantly). The problem was the French military leadership which was stuck in a World War I mindset
by Bruce Walker
Seventy years ago, on May 10, 1940, Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of Great Britain. He had been warning the world about the dangers of Nazism for almost a decade. He had been warning the world about the dangers of Bolshevism since 1918. By the time Churchill became Prime Minister, the British had seen Nazis overrun Poland, Denmark, and Norway. Churchill was watching helplessly as the German Army routed the combined armies of France, Britain, Holland, and Belgium.
The new prime minister did not just face the fury of Hitler’s hordes. Stalin had been a close and effective ally of Hitler since August 1939. Mussolini would quickly pounce and join with Germany against Britain. Japan menaced Commonwealth democracies and British interests in the Pacific. Enemies were everywhere.
Churchill was sixty-five when he first became prime minister. Three days after taking the premiership, Churchill told the British people what to expect: “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat.” His moving words were no exaggeration when he spoke them. Beyond that, few people in May 1940 thought that Britain could actually win the Second World War.
Churchill could have offered something else. Whatever the long-term intentions of the Nazis — and the historians’ battle on that point still rages — there is no doubt about what Hitler was publicly offering: peace, and a peace in which Britain could keep her island and her empire. Churchill, a Conservative, asked Clement Attlee, the Labour Party leader, to join the War Cabinet as Deputy Prime Minister. Attlee remained in the cabinet until Hitler was overcome. (Attlee would go on to defeat Churchill in the 1945 general election.)
Seventy years, almost to the day, after Churchill took over the government of Britain, the nation that produced the most inspiring opponent of totalitarianism and the most courageous politician in the first half of the twentieth century, British political parties contested in a general election, British party leaders showed their mettle and valor, and British voters cast their votes.
Today, Islamic terrorists and militants menace the same Western values that Hitler and Stalin threatened seven decades ago. Like Hitler, radical Islam hates Jews and gobbles up noxious nonsense like Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and believes that Christianity must be destroyed. Like Stalin, radical Islam sees our traditions of ordered liberty and personal freedom as problems. Like Imperial Japan, radical Islam uses suicide bombers. In short, radical Islam operates much like the enemies in the Second World War that Churchill asked his people to fight.
Yet the costs to the British people of stopping radical Islam are trite compared to the price of defeating Hitler, resisting Japanese Imperialism, or containing Communism. No British leader asks the British people to sacrifice serious creature comforts for a brief period of time to stop radical Islam. Churchill led a nation wishing and willing to be led. His eloquence spoke to minds which understood the evil of their enemy and to hearts which would bet their lives to defeat that evil.
Read the rest here: Blood, toil, tears and sweat
► Hot LinksObama vs. Sarkozy over burka
by Rodan ( 33 Comments › )Filed under Dhimmitude, Europe, France, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism at July 6th, 2009 - 4:30 pm
Obama and French President Sarkozy are on a collision course over the issue of banning Burkas. France is looking into banning this symbol of Islamic supremacy. Obama has sated it is his duty to defend Muslims and their interests. This article gives a good analysis of this divergence over the whole issue.
In his June speech in Cairo, U. S. President Barack Obama said that Westerners should “avoid dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear.” On the other hand, French President Nicolas Sarkozy says that burkas and niqabs, both of which cover the face, are a “debasement” of women and shouldn’t be permitted in France.
So who’s right?
Read the rest.
I stand with the French on this one.
Sarkozy Says Burqas Are ‘Not Welcome’ In France
by WrathofG-d ( 51 Comments › )Filed under Europe, France, Free Speech, Islamists, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Religion, Sharia (Islamic Law), World at June 22nd, 2009 - 9:20 am
PARIS (AP) – President Nicolas Sarkozy lashed out Monday at the practice of wearing the Muslim burqa, insisting the full-body religious gown is a sign of the “debasement” of women and that it won’t be welcome in France.
The French leader expressed support for a recent call by dozens of legislators to create a parliamentary commission to study a small but growing trend of wearing the full-body garment in France.
In the first presidential address in 136 years to a joint session of France’s two houses of parliament, Sarkozy laid out his support for a ban even before the panel has been approved—braving critics who fear the issue is a marginal one and could stigmatize Muslims in France.
“In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity,” Sarkozy said to extended applause in a speech at the Chateau of Versailles southwest of Paris.
“The burqa is not a religious sign, it’s a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement—I want to say it solemnly,” he said. “It will not be welcome on the territory of the French Republic.“
In France, the terms “burqa” and “niqab” often are used interchangeably. The former refers to a full-body covering worn largely in Afghanistan with only a mesh screen over the eyes, whereas the latter is a full-body veil, often in black, with slits for the eyes.
Later Monday, Sarkozy was expected to host a state dinner with Sheik Hamad Bin Jassem Al Thani of Qatar. Many women in the Persian Gulf state wear Islamic head coverings in public—whether while shopping or driving cars.
France enacted a law in 2004 banning the Islamic headscarf and other conspicuous religious symbols from public schools, sparking fierce debate at home and abroad. France has Western Europe’s largest Muslim population, an estimated 5 million people.
A government spokesman said Friday that it would seek to set up a parliamentary commission that could propose legislation aimed at barring Muslim women from wearing the head-to-toe gowns outside the home.
The issue is highly divisive even within the government. France’s junior minister for human rights, Rama Yade, said she was open to a ban if it is aimed at protecting women forced to wear the burqa.
But Immigration Minister Eric Besson said a ban would only “create tensions.”
A leading French Muslim group warned against studying the burqa.
________________________________________
► Hot LinksSarkozy: “The Islamization of Europe is inevitable”
by m ( 27 Comments › )Filed under France, Islamic Invasion at June 6th, 2009 - 12:20 pm
According to Philippe de Villiers, Nicolas Sarkozy is resigned to Eurabia.
From Jihadwatch- Sarkozy: “The Islamization of Europe is inevitable”
► Hot Links“Villiers Speaks Out,” from GalliaWatch, June 6 (thanks to Fjordman):
- Why are you so focused on the theme of Turkey and Islamization?
- Quite simply because we will see the first transformations of churches into mosques in the coming three years. At any rate, that is what Nicolas Sarkozy told me.
- When?
- I had an in depth discussion with him at Elysée at the end of last year. He said to me: “You have intuition, I have the figures. And your intuition is confirmed by my figures. The Islamization of Europe is inevitable.” Careful: it’s a process that will not occur overnight, but will take decades.
- Why does this issue appear to be of central importance to you?
- Most politicians have a comforting ignorance of what Islam is and propose transforming Europe into a supermarket of competing religions. Unaware that Islam is not only a religion since, by melding the temporal and the spiritual, it imposes a law. But behind this comforting ignorance of politicians, there are those who know. (…) The reality is that we are headed for a criss-cross (chassé-croisé) with, on one side, Europe and its en masse abortions, its promotion of gay marriage, and on the other, immigration en masse (…)



















