► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘British Islamic Jihadists’ Category

UKIP on the Rise?

by coldwarrior ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Economy, Education, Elections 2012, English Defence League, Multiculturalism, Open thread, Politics, Religion, Special Report, UK at November 29th, 2012 - 3:00 pm

Interesting news…

Could this be Ukip’s day?

Rotherham is usually a staunch Labour town, but ahead of Thursday’s by-election, many locals are in the mood for change

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? - Could this be Ukip’s day?

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? Photo: Guzelian

It is a ramshackle campaign office, with a loo that has yet to be plumbed in and two deckchairs for seating. But this little property is one of the busiest places in Rotherham, with a stream of volunteers coming in and out, and camera crews setting up outside.

The former clothes boutique – “two floors of fashion” is still written on the front window – is home to the UK Independence Party’s campaign in the South Yorkshire town. Today, Rotherham goes to the polls in a parliamentary by-election. That all the talk is about Ukip rather than Labour, which has provided the town’s MP since 1933, is a remarkable turn of events.

The by-election has been called because Denis MacShane, who as a Labour MP at one point enjoyed a 71 per share of the vote, has stepped down in disgrace after he fiddled his expenses. The assumption until a week ago was that however much the town disapproves of his behaviour, it would return another Labour MP. “You could put a red rosette on a donkey and it would get voted in,” says Peter Downey, owner of The Master Barber’s Shop.

However, Lisa Duffy, who is running Ukip’s office, says: “We are on a roll.” She brandishes a cheque for £500. “I’ve received £8,000 in donations just to this office since Saturday.”

This surge in support follows The Daily Telegraph’s report that the Labour-run council in Rotherham had taken three children from their foster parents because the couple were members of Ukip.

Some have cried foul, accusing Ukip of manipulating the foster parents – both former long-term Labour voters – to suit their own ends. But Ms Duffy is clear that the couple’s story has changed Rotherham’s perception of the party. “I think it’s made a huge difference. People are very angry about others telling them how to run their lives, and it’s opened them up to talking about us,” she says.

This PR coup was followed by Stuart Wheeler, Ukip’s treasurer, boasting of a possible eight Tory MPs defecting to the party, and the Conservative vice-chairman Michael Fabricant mooting a possible alliance ahead of the 2015 general election.

So is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party – which finished sixth at the general election in Rotherham – could pull off a victory here?

Of the four people I meet in The Master Barber’s Shop, one is a Labour voter, one would prefer not to say, and the other two – including its owner – say they are voting Ukip. This is not an unusual ratio. Wherever grumbling voters are gathered, you can find a significant clutch who say they are thinking of voting for party recently dismissed by David Cameron as being home to “mainly fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists”.

Mr Downey is clear what the appeal of the party is to this town’s voters: “Ukip are doing well here because of the flood of Eastern Europeans in Rotherham,” he says.

Dave Bennett, who is waiting to have his hair cut, agrees. “My mother-in-law will not now come into the town centre because of the amount of Eastern Europeans hanging around in groups. It’s just large groups of men standing around. People don’t want it.”

Mr Bennett might be dismissed as a “fruitcake” or even a “closet racist” by some in Westminster, but he is an NHS worker and lifelong Labour supporter. His views are echoed time and again on the doorsteps of the old Doncaster Road – in the shadow of the enormous Tata steel works, which announced 110 job losses last week. Many are happy to chat about the foster case and their willingness to vote Ukip.

Bryan and Barbara Archer, in their seventies, are not dissimilar to the foster parents themselves. He used to be in the Navy, she was a school teacher for 24 years; both are former Labour supporters. “It’s an utter disgrace what happened to those children,” Mrs Archer says. “Rotherham Council has done nothing but bring shame to this town. They’ve shown us up with EDL [English Defence League] marches and children being exploited. This used to be a lovely town.”

Rotherham centre is still a handsome, bustling place, dominated by the impressive minster, but you don’t have to travel far to find boarded-up shops and a tattoo parlour that has taken up residence in the Temperance Hall. Its glory days as a coal and steel town are well over.

Victoria Parker, aged 26, who is picking up her child Elise from school, says: “The last job I had was six years ago at McDonald’s. It’s been so hard to get a job.”

Would she consider voting for Jane Collins – “she’s a local Yorkshire lass, from a mining family” – asks Ian Clay, a local solicitor out canvassing for Ukip’s candidate. Like others that Clay meets, Ms Parker gives him a warm reception. “I’m certainly thinking about it.”

The feedback from many of the residents is that it is time for a change. What is curious is that so much of their disaffection has led to support for Ukip – a party that began as a one-issue outfit, and an issue that appears to have little relevance in this town.

The party does now have a proper manifesto, with eye-catching and uncosted promises designed to appeal to disillusioned Tories at the libertarian end of the party: a return to smoking in public places, getting rid of employers’ national insurance contributions, a new flat rate of tax, prison sentences to double, student numbers to halve, free eye tests for all citizens.

But these promises – particularly its two central ones: to put a temporary halt to all immigration, and to hold a referendum about pulling out of Europe – have struck a bell far from its roots in the Home Counties, where many regard it as only a half-serious outfit supported by eccentric celebrities such as Peter Stringfellow, the nightclub owner, and Neil Hamilton, the disgraced former MP.

Mrs Archer says: “You work hard all your life for a comfortable retirement and for what? It’s blown away in the wind. There’s all this money being given away to the EU, which could be spent here.”

The economic chaos in Europe has been helpful to Ukip, which believes it has the wind in its sails. Nigel Farage, its leader, claimed the party was “the third force in British politics” after the Corby by-election earlier this month, when it won 14 per cent of the vote and forced the Lib Dems into an embarrassing, deposit-losing fourth place.

Some psephologists believe that Ukip’s importance is over-stated. Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London, disagrees that it could cause many Tories with slim majorities to lose their seats: “If Ukip withdrew, some of these people might not vote at all, some might – believe it or not – vote Lib Dem, some might vote for a more radical party. Only in a handful of seats did Ukip make a difference. It’s nowhere near the 20 or 30 suggested.”

Despite the momentum, Ukip is still small, with a mere 19,000 members – the equivalent of just a few tables of pub drinkers in each constituency. But these sums appear to hold little truck in Rotherham, where the lack of jobs and prospects are the main concerns.

Jodie Dolby, a 19-year-old unemployed mother, says she’s considering Ukip because, “I think there’s a lot more immigration now.” Does she worry that some might think that curbing immigration is racist?

“No way. My daughter’s dad is Asian. My grandma is Asian. But there are a lot more people coming in, getting properties, and all the money is going back, not staying here.”

Mr Downey in his barber shop is clear that Rotherham is a world away from Westminster: “What is classed as racist is determined by white middle-class people down in London, not by minorities up here.”

Tommy Robinson of the EDL arrested to please Islamists

by Rodan ( 21 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Dhimmitude, English Defence League, Islamic Supremacism, Special Report, UK at October 23rd, 2012 - 2:41 pm

A British Imamm Saiful Islam, who has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is a supporter of al-Qaeda, was beaten up Saturday morning. He had been advocating overthrowing the British government and creating an Islamic state. Having enough of his garbage, British patriots rightfully beat him up. Since the victim was a Muslim, the UK police went out of their way to find the perpetrators, unlike when Muslims beat up native British.  They accused the EDL of the action and have arrested their leader, Stephen Lennon who calls himself Tommy Robinson.

English Defense League leader Stephen Lennon has been arrested over an alleged assault in Luton on Saturday morning.

It is believed the victim was Saiful Islam, known for preaching his extremist views in Bury Park.

The pair featured in Channel 4 documentary Proud and Prejudiced earlier this year, and a You Tube video of an altercation between the pair in Bury Park last year has been viewed nearly 300,000 times.

A spokesman for Beds Police said a man was assaulted in New Bedford Road at about 10.15am by five men who got out of a black BMW.

To add insult to injury, Stephen Lennon is being held in a mostly Islamic section of the jail he is in.

If this wasn’t bad enough, Kevin Carroll, a candidate for the EDL linked British Freedom party was arrested on Saturday. They linked him to an arrest of 53 EDL members who were on their way to East London that day.

British Freedom Party candidate Kevin Carroll was arrested after about 50 English Defense League (EDL) supporters were stopped by police on Saturday, the party said.

Police said officers arrested 53 men in connection with an operation in London.

A spokesman for the party said Mr Carroll’s election campaign would be “unaffected”.

The spokesman said: “Following Saturday’s events, we learn directly from Kevin Carroll that he has been bailed until 30 November, which means that his election campaign for Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) is unaffected.

“We can confirm that Kevin was not among EDL supporters stopped by police… but was arrested later whilst driving to his home.”

It is obvious the elites in Britain, like those in America, Europe, Latin America and Australia, believe in appeasing the Islamic scum. Patriots who stand up for their nations are politically persecuted. Meanwhile on Friday there will be Imams all throughout the UK calling for an Islamic state. The British police will do nothing.

I really don’t understand the love of Islam Western elites have.

(Hat Tip: Osprey and Gates of Vienna)

Terrorism has become the real international sport

by Speranza ( 170 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Iran, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, UK at July 16th, 2012 - 2:00 pm

I cannot say that I am surprised that 40 years after the Munich Massacre, the I.O.C. will still not have a minute of silence in honor the the 11 murdered Israelis. As for Britain, the massive security she needs for the summer games  ironically is because so many of her Muslim citizens are potential terrorists, as the Knish points out.

by Daniel Greenfield

In a sign of the times, the London Summer Olympics will be defended by anti-aircraft guns and surface-to-air missiles… just as they were in Ancient Greece. G4S, the world’s largest security company, was to provide 12,000 security personnel, but has so far only managed to come up with 4,000. In another sign of the times, not all of their security personnel speak English. So instead the British government will be deploying 3,000 troops, all of whom hopefully do speak English.

This isn’t the first time that the Olympics have come to London. They came in 1908 when the likely threat was from the Hun. They would have come again in 1944, but war intervened, and London needed its anti-aircraft weapons to protect more vital targets. Instead the games had to be rescheduled to 1948 in a Summer Olympics known as the Austerity Games. Still despite the post-war conditions, the games were described as, “a warm flame of hope for a better understanding in the world which has burned so low.”

But if Europeans could hope to relate to other Europeans through sporting matches, that flame seems rather cool when London has to be ringed with anti-aircraft defenses, as in the days of the Blitz. Muslim terrorists showed the world what they thought of the Olympic Spirit in the Summer Olympics of 1972 with the Munich Massacre and ever since then the shadow of Muslim terror has darkened the flames of the torches.

[.........]

Terrorism has become the true international sport

Terrorism has become the true international sport and newspapers spend almost as much time forecasting the types of terrorist attacks that may be tried, as they do discussing the athletes. Will it be nerve gas this year? A drone attack? Or perhaps an old-fashioned suicide bombing that seems almost quaint now.

[.......]

Hitler’s V2 rockets were not terribly accurate, but they weren’t meant to be. They were weapons of terror and those work best when they are random. Sieges are more devastating to morale than actual battles. The fear that an attack could come at any time and in any place drains away courage and replaces it with fear until any demand that the enemy makes is met with relieved acceptance.

Random terror is the weapon of the weak, whether it was the declining forces of Nazi Germany or the viciously stupid armies of diversity plotting to impose Islamic law by killing a few hundred people here or there. The scrum of preparations and the frantic media panics make them feel strong and potent. As much as Islamic terrorists love their inky Korans, they love the sight of their names in the paper even more. Reading that the entire country is terrified of them does wonders for their morale even as it plummets our own.

There are few open mentions of who the enemy might be that all those weapons and soldiers are directed against. All we know is that they are extremists who are extremely keen on blowing things up for the mysterious unknown reasons that extremists do things—possibly outrage over student tuition or spending cuts. Of course everyone knows, but everyone is also polite enough to say nothing. It’s easier to order a few thousand more guards, some of whom may speak English, and throw up some surface-to-air missiles, than to discuss why these things have become as much a part of the Olympics as torches, medals and rings.

The ring of steel around London isn’t there to protect against German warplanes, but against the men and women with British passports and accents, from Manchester, Birmingham and London, who burn with another kind of flame. Not the flame of the Olympic spirit, but the flame of the Islamic spirit.

1 out of 4 British Muslims say that the 7/7 bombings were justified. 33 percent say killing in the name of religion is justified. 61 percent want Sharia courts operating under Islamic law. With nearly 3 million British Muslims, that’s nearly 750,000 potential terrorists to a mere 12,000 guards. The sight of British soldiers fresh from patrolling Afghanistan being retasked to guard London should be enormously significant as a sign of things to come.

There are already 16 million Muslims in the European Union. That’s half of Afghanistan. With high birth rates and population doubling, there will be an entire Afghanistan’s worth of Muslims in the EU within two decades.

NATO was unable to hold Afghanistan, but it might consider that as practice for the more vital task of holding London and Paris. And it will need a good deal more men and anti-aircraft weapons that are there all through the year.

Naturally no one is thinking of that now, just as when the flood of Muslim immigrants began no one was thinking that the next time the Olympics came to London it would take twenty battalions and weapons designed to fight a Soviet invasion just to secure the brotherhood games of mankind. Considering that no one had enough wit to have enough guards in place for the Olympics, it isn’t likely that the same system frantically deploying troops now is thinking twenty years ahead.

That’s a pity because the enemy, the bearded men in basement mosques who inspire Muslims to blow themselves up, are thinking twenty years ahead. They’re also thinking two-hundred years ahead to an Islamic London which will be as likely to play host to games full of half-naked athletes and pagan symbols as it will be to host a free press or a pub. The idea sounds absurd, but then again Istanbul used to be called Constantinople.

The thing about absurd ideas is that they only stay absurd if someone stops them from being carried out. As the immigrants keep coming, nailing down refugee status, dole payments and several wives, there will eventually be enough of them around so that the 61 percent that wants Sharia law will get their way, just as they did in Egypt. It will take a while, but that just means there will be plenty more terror alerts to look forward to in the interim.

[.......]

The importance of participation is the glorious slogan of diversity, but the people who might just be working out their 2012 Summer Olympics plots are not satisfied with taking part in London or Europe. They did not come there to win “Good Conduct” medals. They came to win.

Their struggle, their Jihad, is to conquer, and the devil take fighting well. If they have to send out dupes with bomb belts into crowded streets, they will do it. If they have to spend years smiling and commiserating over football scores, they will. If they have to resort to sneaking about, sodomy or explosive pants, they will do those things.

There is no good sportsmanship in terror

There is no good sportsmanship in terror. No one congratulates you for following the rules, any rules, or for empathizing with your rival as he struggles toward the finish line. In the Olympics playing well is more important than winning because victory is materialistic, while sportsmanship is a spiritual act. In Islam, both winning and sportsmanship are materialistic, the only spiritual act is the struggle that leads to victory. There is no room for empathizing with the fallen enemy or admiring the runner who limps across the finish line. These are tests of character and the only test of character in Islam that matters is being willing to kill or die in the name of Islam.

There is no character outside Islam. There are no rules outside Islam. There is nothing outside Islam, and that means there is nothing inside Islam either.

Athletics are meant to substitute for war, but the idea of finding substitutes for war is alien to the Islamic Spirit. The Taliban notoriously persecuted chess and football players, and when they took Kabul, they turned football stadiums into places of execution. Egyptian Salafi clerics are already discussing outlawing football. Mali Islamists have banned football, and Somali Islamists have murdered men for watching the World Cup.

To the Islamists, sports are a distraction from what is truly important in life, a contest whose lack of meaning mocks the seriousness of their preferred sport of death. As the Ayatollah Khomeini said, “There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humor in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious.” And when you are as empty as Islam is, then everything is serious.

[........]

The armies of Muslims that have gathered in Europe, whether they know it or not, are not there to play according to any set of rules, they are not there to have fun, they are there to conquer and win.

Read the rest -  The Olympic Spirit and the Islamic Spirit

More evidence and more girls exploited by Muslim cowards in the U.K.

by coldwarrior ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, British Islamic Jihadists, Crime, government, immigration, Islam, Open thread, Pakistan, Patriotism, Political Correctness, Sharia (Islamic Law), Special Report, Terrorism, Theocratic Progressives, UK at May 12th, 2012 - 12:00 pm

I have an update to this story:

 

Fear of Appearing Racist???  This is about a gang of MUSLIM ‘men’ in the UK  from Pakistan and surrounding areas exploiting, raping, and whoring out vulnerable white teen girls. Some girls were as young as 13. Now it turns out that there are at least 47 girls, NONE of whom are muslim south Asians. odd that, isn’t it?

 

It looks like the judge, who appears to be the only adult in Manchester with a functioning brain, in the case has a disagreement with the local police who failed to act against these egregious crimes for fear of being labeled ‘racist’. The police knew about this ring in 2002:

 

Several men have been arrested by Greater Manchester Police on suspicion of sexually abusing the same girl.

The alleged abuse is believed to have taken place over a six-year period when the girl was in her teens.

Sources who spoke to the Manchester Evening News described her as ‘extremely vulnerable’. Detectives have carried out video interviews with the girl, who told them she knew the men only by nicknames.

A string of suspects were tracked down by officers and a number of arrests have now been made.

The men are thought to be from Asian and Afro-Caribbean backgrounds. (CW ads that religion has not been mentioned anywhere yet for any of these scum).

It comes just days after nine Asian men from Rochdale and Oldham were jailed over the sexual exploitation of girls as young as 13-years-old.

Five girls gave evidence during the trial of the abuse they suffered between 2008-2010. Detectives who investigated the case said they encountered 47 other girls who they believe were also the victim of sexual abuse.

The conclusion of the case this week has sparked a major debate about whether the crimes were racially motivated.

Judge Gerald Clifton, jailing the nine, suggested they had targeted their victims because they were ‘not of your community or religion’.

But police and political leaders denied the crimes were about race – saying the men had targeted their victims simply because they were vulnerable.

Following the trial Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, said it was likely more arrests would be made following the trial.

A file of evidence on the new arrests is expected to handed over to the Crown Prosecution Service within weeks.

Detectives are exploring possible links between the men, although none have been established so far.

A spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said he could not confirm the number of men that had been arrested at this stage.

These ‘men’, and i use that term in the biological sense only because real men would never do such a crime, were acting within their cultural norms, as I stated in the original post. Now it looks like some scholars agree:

 

Asian sex gang ‘were acting within cultural norms’

David Starkey risks fresh controversy by claiming that Asian men jailed over a major child sexual exploitation ring were “acting within their own cultural norms”.

 

There comes a point where Englishmen are going to have to act against these muslim coward bastards who are turning England into a Third World Sharia based hell hole. C’mon lads, you had no problems killing and murdering thousands of Irish. This time it’s to save YOURSELVES and take back England.

 

If worse comes to worse, I will lead a team in to dismantle the Tadcaster Brewery and bring it back to the US for safe keeping. I will be asking for volunteers in the near future.

 

 

Fear of Appearing Racist???

by coldwarrior ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Crime, Islam, Special Report, UK at May 8th, 2012 - 7:00 pm

They have lost their minds in the UK, truly lost their damn minds. Fear of being labeled ‘racist’ prevented the prosecution of these muslim scum who gang raped a 13 year old????

 

Appearances were more important than justice and stopping crime?

 

These muslim scum are described as Asian of course. Asian is the ‘safe’ way to say muslim / paki / middle eastern dirt-bags.  I don’t know who is worse, the muslim scum who did this or the police for being spineless. I guess the police are more at fault because i don’t expect much in the way of civilized behavior from muslim males anywhere. So if its not homosexual pedophilia in Afghanistan its gang raping 13 year olds in the UK and honor killing your women everywhere else. Muslim men are cowards because they allow this to go on unchallenged or worse, they approve of and participate in it.  Do we say any muslim ‘men’ protesting these things? no, we don’t. Where are the masses of so called ‘moderate muslims’ rooting this stuff out and decrying it from the rooftops? We don’t see  any real action against this from the muslim community because these deviants are the norm in their rat hole countries and we in the West are just now waking up to the atrocity that is islam.

Rochdale grooming trial: Police accused of failing to investigate paedophile gang for fear of appearing racist

Police and social workers were last night accused of failing to investigate an Asian paedophile gang for fear of being perceived as racist, allowing them to prey on up to 50 young white girls.

The nine men from Rochdale were yesterday convicted of abusing five vulnerable teenagers after plying them with alcohol, food and small sums of money in return for sex.

However, the true number of victims, who were “passed around” by the gang, is likely to be nearer to 50, police have admitted.

Greater Manchester Police and the Crown Prosecution Service have now apologised after they failed to bring the case of the first victim – Girl A – to trial following her cry for help in August 2008.

One 13 year-old victim became pregnant and had the child aborted while another was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night, Liverpool Crown Court heard.

Complaints to social workers and the police were ignored because they were “petrified of being called racist”, former Labour MP for Keighley Ann Cryer said.

Mrs Cryer, who has campaigned to bring the issue of Asian sex gangs to light, said the girls had been “betrayed” and condemned to “untold misery” by the police and social services.

(Clockwise from top left) Abdul Qayyum, Rochdale rape victim known as Girl E, Kabeer Hassan, Qamar Shahzad and Abdul Rauf (Getty Images/Anita Maric /newsteam) (Clockwise from top left) Abdul Qayyum, Rochdale rape victim known as Girl E, Kabeer Hassan, Qamar Shahzad and Abdul Rauf (Getty Images/Anita Maric /newsteam)

“This is an absolute scandal. They were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness,” she said.

“They had a greater fear of being perceived in that light than in dealing with the issues in front of them.”

Girl A told police that she had been raped and provided DNA evidence from her attacker, however the CPS twice decided not to prosecute him.

The 15 year-old’s abuse continued and at its height she was being driven to flats and houses to be raped by up to five men a night, four or five days a week. She was singled out because she was white, vulnerable and under-age.

Her ordeal only ended when her teachers forced social workers to intervene after she fell pregnant and they became concerned by the number of Asian men picking her up from school.

Girl A said that in a six-hour interview she gave police details about her abusers and where the attacks took place. Crucially, too, she handed officers underwear that proved she had been raped by two men in a single attack.

“I hoped they were going to do something and it would stop,” she said.

“But it just carried on. It just started again with different men and more men this time, and that’s when it started becoming up to five men a day”.

Kabeer Hassan, Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rauf, Mohammed Sajid, Adil Khan, Abdul Qayyum, Mohammed Amin, Hamid Safi and a 59-year-old man who cannot be named for legal reasons were yesterday found guilty of running a child exploitation ring at Liverpool Crown Court.

Greater Manchester Police is now being investigated by the IPCC over the failings of its first investigation in 2008.

When GMP did finally pass a file on Girls A’s rape to the CPS the following year, a Crown lawyer decided not to charge anyone because he said she would not be a sufficiently credible witness to put before a jury. A second CPS lawyer backed that opinion.

It was only after social workers notice an upsurge in cases of child grooming that police reinvestigated and made a series of arrests which led to yesterday’s convictions.

It can be reported that the trial was delayed by two weeks when two Asian barristers quit the case due to intimidation by far right groups outside Liverpool Crown Court.

And a tweet from BNP leader Nick Griffin almost caused the trial to collapse when it led to allegations of the jury having a “far-right bias”.

Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood acknowledged that officers could have dealt with the case “better than we did”.

But he denied that the girl’s complaints had been “brushed under the carpet” because officers were reluctant to confront the issue of race.

“At the time we did what we thought was best,” he said. “We have learned a lot of lessons.

“The issue here is genuinely about vulnerability. It just happens that they are Asian men. In no way did we sweep it under the carpet.”

Steve Garner, head of children’s services at Rochdale Council, denied the teenager had been let down by his department.

“No,” he said. “I think it’s really important to remember that what we know now and what we knew in 2008 is very, very different and what we have done is put the lessons in place”.

Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk said: “What’s become clear is that if police had acted seriously on these concerns in 2008 many of the victims of this appalling case would not have had to go through such horrific trauma.

“It is simply unacceptable that these young women were let down in this way by people they should have been able to trust.”

 

Postcard from Londonistan

by Speranza ( 114 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Islam, Political Correctness, Progressives, UK at January 4th, 2012 - 8:30 am

Mr. Shapiro’s experiences in Londonistan mirrors my own the last three  times I was  there (2002, 2003 and 2005). I never tire of walking the streets and exploring the sights and neighborhoods of London and I know interesting historical sites that many Londoners are oblivious of.  However, I am very sad to see a great nation lose its self confidence (heaven forbid Charles – not Charles Johnson lol- ever becomes King)  and I am afraid that the same thing will happen here after another four years of Barack Obama. As much as we need another leader with the wisdom and courage of Ronald W. Reagan, the U.K. desperately needs another Iron Lady (Margaret Thatcher).

by Ben Shapiro

I’ve been spending my Christmas vacation with my wife in Rome and London. We arrived in London on Christmas Eve.  It’s truly an amazing city – everywhere you look, there’s history, from the Tower of London to the Churchill Museum.  But everywhere you look, there is a more ominous presence: Islam.

[.......]

That failure of integration is clear from the get-go.  There are official signs translated into Arabic for those who do not wish to speak or read English.  The chatter of Islamic languages is as prevalent as the mother tongue. The hijab is omnipresent.

Perhaps all this might be a charming byproduct of multiculturalism if it weren’t for the fact that so much of the Islamic population of Great Britain is radicalized.  That radicalization is not difficult to spot.

With all the major official sites closed the day after Christmas, my wife and I headed over to Madame Tussaud’s to take in the famed tourist trap.  As we strolled the halls filled with famous cultural figures, most from the 20th century, we came across the wax doll for Albert Einstein.  And there, crowded around the figure, stood five young Muslims – two male, three female.  While other guests stood next to the model and smiled, or put an arm around it, these Muslim worthies stood next to the wax model – and put their hands around its throat, simulating strangling it.  At first, I couldn’t believe what I was watching – did Einstein do something to offend these people? – but then it dawned on me that they were doing this because Einstein was a Jew.  In fact, Einstein was the only prominent Jew in Tussaud’s.  And who wouldn’t want to strangle a prominent Jew, after all?

That suspicion was confirmed a few minutes later when we reached the wax statue of Adolf Hitler.  Britons and Americans tried to choke the figure, or pointed their fingers at it in imaginary guns, or yelled at it.  These young Muslims happily stood next to it, and took smiling photographs with it as though they’d stumbled upon a friendly uncle. Which, in a way, they had.

And, of course, nobody said anything to these delightfully diverse young people. Mustn’t show evidence of that old, imperialist spirit, you know.

[...]

But that Britishness is buried rather deep.  The day after Christmas in the United Kingdom is Boxing Day, a sort of Black Friday in this country.  It’s a nightmare to navigate the crowded streets, and the shops are packed solid.

It was precisely this day that the British Tube employees – workers of the British subway system – chose to strike for 24 hours.  This meant that everyone was now obliged to use taxis, which were charging double rates, or take a bus – and the traffic was snarled more horribly than Matthew Pocket’s hair.  What were these employees striking for?  Triple pay on holidays – and an offset day to make up for having to work on Boxing Day.  They were already slated to make double pay.

In any rational society, the British government would fire these ne’er-do-wells forthwith and hire scabs to replace them.  But Britain’s post-WWII bargain with the devil has been the same as the rest of the West’s: go Marxist and remove your imperial aggression by doing so.  Capitalism, in the Marxist view, leads to imperialism; breed the capitalism out, and so too will the imperialism fade into history.  And so Britain has castrated itself, both economically and socially.

But deep in the British soul, there stirs the echo of heroism: the echo of Churchill and Henry V, the echo of Elizabeth I and Cromwell. As time passes, that echo will grow ever louder.  The question is whether the echo will restore Britain’s fortitude before it descends into a self-imposed dark night of final decline.

Read the rest: Postcard from Islamic London

EDL Frontman Tommy Robinson Assaulted By….guess who?

by coldwarrior ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, English Defence League, Free Speech, Headlines, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, UK at December 23rd, 2011 - 12:54 am

h/t Zimriel. This is the as of yet unconfirmed story. More details to follow, i am sure.

Details at Gates of Vienna

 

He was out driving, when he saw a car similar to his wife’s, driven by a blond white girl. The other car flashed its lights so Tommy pulled over.

A group of Pakistani youths wearing knuckle dusters poured out. Tommy was knocked out pretty quickly, and they gave him a good kicking.

He looks pretty beaten up, but no bones were broken, and no eyes or teeth are missing. He had a brain scan this morning. We don’t know the results yet.

He has spoken to The Sun, who asked whether he had called the police. Tommy said there was no point, as a racial attack on a white guy was of no interest to them.

Update 3:50pm EST:

The EDL is urging its supporters to remain calm.

We all want Tommy to go to the police. We need to learn whether the police will act against the perpetrators of this heinous act. If not, it is yet more evidence that there is a two-tier system of justice in England.

Update 3:26pm EST:

Message from Tommy: “They were shouting ‘allahu akhbar’ and ‘Merry Christmas, Tommy’”.

Also: He had a C.T. scan, and apparently has “bruising of the brain”. He got out of hospital this afternoon.

 

Merry Christmas indeed.

 

 

Britain on the edge of the cliff

by Speranza ( 130 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Dhimmitude, Egypt, Hezballah, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Jihad, Lebanon, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Libya, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians, Political Correctness, Saudi Arabia, September 11 at September 14th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The  great Melanie Phillips in a long but well worth the time  reading the entire column, gives sad examples to back up her statement that Britain has learned nothing – actually drawn the wrong conclusions -  from 9/11 and the July 7, 2005 terror attacks in London. A slavish devotion to the concept of “multiculturalism”, political correctness, a leftist domination of the Church of England, the media, the popular culture, and academia, (sound familiar?) an undisguised anti Semitism masquerading as anti-Zionism, and an inherent self loathing by the “chattering classes” (think Prince Charles), combined with a “post-Christian” world view,  has all worked its cumulative poison on the United Kingdom.

by Melanie Phillips

The tenth anniversary of 9/11 has been marked by a fresh outbreak in Britain of the political equivalent of auto-immune disease: treating the mortal enemies of the west as the victims of the west, while treating the west’s defenders as its mortal enemies.

One thing al Qaeda got right about Britain and Europe (but not about the patriotic heartlands of the US) was that they no longer had the will to fight and die for their beliefs because they no longer knew what they were.

Surely, however, even al Qaeda could not have envisaged quite how stunningly incapable the western intelligentsia and political class would be of grasping the difference between civilisation and its would-be destroyers, and how comprehensively they would therefore play into the Islamists’ hands – even now, ten years on.

For the chattering classes seem determined to give al Qaeda a helping hand in reducing the west to a state of paralysis and impotence. According to liberal opinion, every single thing America did after 9/11 was wrong.

The strategy of pre-emptive war was wrong. Better, apparently, that Saddam should still be in power developing his nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programmes! Better that the Taliban were still in power training al Qaeda! Then we would all be so much safer!

[...]

In the Guardian the esteemed thinker Francis Fukuyama, whose earlier thesis that the global triumph of democracy had brought about the end of history was not altogether borne out by the events of 9/11, marked the anniversary by dismissing al Qaeda as ‘a mere blip or diversion’, with the US ‘overreaction’ to 9/11 turning anti-Americanism into ‘a self-fulfilling prophecy’ – the murder of almost 3000 Americans in the attacks on New York and Washington clearly being inspired by a ‘blip’ that had nothing to do with anti-Americanism.

Also in the Guardian, Mehdi Hasanidentified the ‘preachers of hate and division’ — not as Islamist fanatics but as those who warn against them. The only victims mentioned in this article were not the murdered Americans on 9/11, nor the Muslim and other victims of Islamist terrorism across the world, but Muslims in Britain who were now apparently too terrified to speak in public for fear of being labelled an extremist (with the exception, it seems, of Mehdi Hasan).

And last week on BBC News Hard Talk, former New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani repeatedly laughed incredulously at the assumptions of his interviewer, BBC correspondent Stephen Sackur. Wouldn’t you admit, said Sackur, that American policy after 9/11 in Afghanistan and Iraq was a mistake? Why should I admit that? said Giuliani when he had finished laughing; the US has foiled 42 separate terror attacks since then because of that security policy put in place by President Bush. 

Sackur tried again. But surely, he said, the police security strategy of targeting the Muslim community ‘gets in the way of the healing’. Giuliani laughed again even more incredulously. Well they would hardly target synagogues or churches he said. Of course the police targeted the mosques. It was from the mosques that the terror plots were coming. This is no more bad for Muslims than it was bad for Italian/Americans when I went after the Mafia in New York!

No wonder Giuliani laughed – he must have thought he’d wandered onto the set of a BBC comedy show by mistake.

[...]

‘There are a few Muslims who argue that democracy, the right to elect a secular government, does not accord with Islamic principles. ..It is perhaps worth noting that the modern Muslim Brotherhood does not subscribe to these non-democratic principles and actually condemned 9/11.

But I still find it difficult to accept that the terror attacks were on ‘freedom’ or ‘democracy’ as some have claimed. The young men who committed the crime came from countries without democratic rights or freedoms, with no liberty to express their views in open debate, no easy way of changing their rulers, no opportunity for choice and well-aware that the west often supported these autocratic rulers, for them as for many others an external enemy was I believe a unifying way of expressing their own frustrations.’

[...]

As for al Qaeda being inspired by frustration with Arab rulers, has this woman never read the works of Osama bin Laden, as in his Letter to the American People where his first requirement is that America should become an Islamic state? How can the inspiration for those who turn themselves into human bombs be frustration at their lack of democratic freedom when so many Islamic terrorists have been highly educated within the west? If they are so frustrated by lack of democratic freedoms, who do they constantly declare their intention to snuff out those freedoms?

And how does ‘taking out their frustration on the west’ explain this, the wholesale persecution of Christians by Islamists across the Third World? How does it explain the assassination of the Pakistani regional governor for his stance against Islamist extremism – and the quarter of a million who took to the streets in Pakistan in support of this murder?

[...]

The real problem with the US and UK reaction to 9/11 was that they did not follow through. It was Iran which destabilised Iraq post Saddam, Iran which was killing coalition troops there just as it had attacked western interests ever since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Saddam and the Taliban were threats to our interests from their sponsorship of terror and pursuit of weapons of mass destruction which they intended to use against the west (and contrary to received wisdom, WMD programmes were found in Iraq that had been in existence up to the start of the war). But we should have gone on to deal with Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Saudi as well.

[...]

Back in the 1990s, Nazir-Ali warned the British government that large numbers of British Muslims were being dangerously radicalised. What’s the difference between his situation then and now? In the 1990s, ministers simply didn’t believe him when he told the truth about the Islamisation of Britain and the need to defend the west against a civilisational attack; his warnings were ignored. In 2009, he was effectively driven out of office in the Church of England because he told the truth about the Islamisation of Britain and the need to defend the west against a civilisational attack.

That is how Britain has travelled in the past ten years since 9/11 – steadily towards the edge of the cliff. And Lemmingland is still travelling in exactly the same direction.

Read the rest: 9/11 anniversary Britain has traveled steadily towards the edge of the cliff

The EDL Clarifies its Position on Israel/ and the EDL Jewish Division Fallout

by coldwarrior ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, British Islamic Jihadists, English Defence League, Islam, Islamists, Judaism, Special Report, UK at August 10th, 2011 - 12:06 pm

Now that they have clarified, lets move on. It is a long read, so I put it in over here in Special Report

 

(This was written after the EDL leadership dismissed Roberta Moore, leader of the EDL’s Jewish Division some weeks ago)

 

Taken Straight from their Webpage:

 

Pre-Word

In recent weeks there has been a great deal of speculation about the EDL’s position on Israel, and the role that the EDL Jewish Division has played in determining our direction.

The following statement is intended to set the record straight. The statement was prepared by the EDL Editorial Team according to the wishes of the leadership, and has been fully approved by EDL Joint-Leader Kevin Carroll.

We do not believe it would be appropriate to single out any individuals involved in recent events, and believe it to be in everyone’s interests that any further concerns be communicated privately.

Thank you,

EDL Editorial Team


Standing Firm

We wish to make this as clear as it can be:

We support Israel’s right to exist, and we support Israel’s right to defend itself.

But there is no reason why we cannot continue to support Israel whilst still being fully committed to halting the advance of radical Islam in our own country.

We support Israel, but England will always come first.

We will never risk the future of the EDL by pursuing an agenda that has little to do with the realities facing our country, and which would, quite rightly, do a great deal to jeopardise our cause.

The English Defence League also has the right to defend itself, and we will not allow the interests of a small minority override the concerns of the majority of our supporters.

Our focus is on England. It always has been and it always will be.

In many ways there are parallels to be drawn between the radicalisation that has infected the Palestinians and their supporters and the radicalisation that continues to breed in British Mosques. In this way at least, the people of England and the people of Israel have a great deal in common.

Whatever we may think of the conflict, the people of Israel face the threat of Islam-inspired terrorism every single day. With the possible exception of other Muslims, it is the Jewish people that have suffered more than anyone else at the hands of radical Islam. Even in the UK prominent Muslim organisations continue to boycott Holocaust Memorial Day, preferring instead to attend Al Quds Day marches, where they publicly support proscribed terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah, celebrate tyrants like Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini, or support pariah Islamic states with appalling human rights records. And in European nations wherever there are increases in the Muslim population, so too are there increases in the number of antisemitic incidents reported.

The war against radical Islam has no borders, even if Israel is the front line of the battle. It is an international problem, and it would be foolish of us not to ally ourselves with like-minded individuals and organisations across the world. Already, we have seen supporters from all over the world travel to this country to stand side by side with us at our demonstrations. We are thankful for their support, and have reciprocated by joining the demonstration against the Ground Zero Mosque and attending La Marche des Cochons.

We should not be afraid to show solidarity with ordinary people who are continuing to suffer at the hands of radical Islam, wherever they may be. Wherever there are Muslims who support a hostile, aggressive, 7th century interpretation of Islam, we will do what we can to aid those who are working to defeat it – be they Christian, Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Americans, Europeans, Brits, Israelis – whoever they are.

In combating the global jihad, we find that we have friends in many distant lands, and that our goals often coincide. Radical Islam may regard the USA as the ‘Great Satan’, but at the root of the conflict is their view that Islam must come to dominate Judeo-Christian civilisation. The global ‘war on terror’ that followed the September 11th attacks was not simply aimed at defending the USA and her allies, but at defeating those who so despise the Judeo-Christian heritage that defines the Western World. It is therefore no wonder that following the fallout from the September 11th attacks many Western nations learned a great deal from Israel – a country with extensive experience of dealing with the realities of terrorism.

If Israel succumbs to the forces of radical Islam and the proponents of Sharia then the “only working democracy in the Middle East” will fall. The impact of such a thing would be felt across the world, and would massively embolden those who hate the freedoms we enjoy in the Western world. It is in all our interests that the nation on the front line of the battle against radical Islam should not fall.

However, our immediate concern will always be with the impact that radical Islam is having at home. Whilst we have a great number of international friends and supporters, and have done our bit to help inspire the establishment of many national defence leagues around the world, our principle concern has always been representing the people that make up our membership – the people of England.

We therefore refuse to be drawn into alliances with individuals or organisations who in their laudable defence of Israel overstep the boundaries of what we believe to be legitimate and reasonable. Extremism cannot be fought with extremism.

The decision made by individuals within the EDL Jewish Division to ally themselves with the JTF (Jewish Task Force), an organisation whose leader, Victor Vancier, was imprisoned on terrorism charges, was made without the authority of the EDL Leadership, and we have ensured that all ties have been severed with that organisation. Israel itself has proscribed the JTF as a terrorist organisation, and Vancier has been recorded making incredibly offensive and inflammatory statements about black people, Christians, and homosexuals. This could hardly be further from the objectives and beliefs of the English Defence League, and it is hugely disappointing that in the fallout of this sorry episode a small number of Jewish Division members saw fit to make personal attacks on members of the EDL Support Group for criticising their decision to align themselves with known extremists.

We once again wish to make it entirely clear that we never have and never will support any individuals or organisations that advocate violence, be it in defence of the Jewish people or in order to advance any other cause (including, of course, attacks against Muslims). Whilst we acknowledge the difference between a non-violent approach and total pacifism, we maintain that the only time violence can be justified is in immediate self-defence, and subject to the laws of the land. We believe that the JTF’s stance and the personal example of its leader go well beyond this. Our commitment has always been to peaceful protest, and we will never do anything to undermine this.

Following these disagreements the leader of the EDL Jewish Division decided to step down and leave both the Jewish Division and the EDL. Our objectives were clearly not the same.

We of course recognise the value of listening to people with different viewpoints, and we certainly respect those who have a genuine commitment to helping to defeat the spread of radical Islam – whoever they may be, and wherever they are in the world. But this does mean that we are willing to turn a blind eye to other forms of extremism. For example, back in December of last year, controversial US pastor Terry Jones enquired about the possibility of speaking at an EDL demonstration. Somehow, the media got wind of this and, quite inaccurately, reported that we had agreed.

The reasons why we did not wish to invite the pastor to speak at one of our demonstrations was made clear at the time – and, in some cases, was accurately reported in the press. Not only do we believe that burning the Qur’an is wrong (and sends out completely the wrong message), but we also believe that it would be wrong to provide a platform to anyone who, like Victor Vancier of the JTF, has made incredibly offensive and intolerant statements about homosexuality. We also certainly do not wish to be associated with a man who has known links to the Westboro Baptist Church – an organisation which, amongst other things, pickets the funerals of US service personnel.

Regardless of all the possible disagreements and positions that people can take on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, no one could possibly claim that any objection that they might have to US or UK involvement in these conflicts could justify taunting the mourning families of those who have lost their lives.

Likewise, although there is certainly a great deal of disagreement within the EDL about the situation in Israel, even an EDL member who might happen to be incredibly critical of Israel would never claim that such a view could justify any mistreatment of Jewish people, or their exclusion from the EDL. In fact, members of the Jewish community have long been an important and integral part of the EDL – and so they shall remain.

The actions of a small minority of individuals should not be seen to sully the reputation of the majority of the EDL’s Jewish supporters, whose commitment to the objectives of the EDL is not in doubt. We would never think of censoring open debate by failing to permit criticism of Israel, but we will continue to be vigilant against infiltration by those who hold antisemitic views.

Unlike organisations such as the UAF or BNP, whose antisemitism is often plain to see, the only evidence ever produced to accuse the EDL of holding such views has been gathered from Facebook – hardly the most compelling of evidence. Why would anyone who does hold antisemitic views join an organisation that has always made clear its support for Israel and which has flown the Star of David since its earliest demonstrations?

The small number of people who have made antisemitic comments whilst falsely purporting to represent the EDL are either grossly misinformed about the nature of the movement, wish to undermine our progress, or suffer from the delusion that the EDL can be steered away from its commitment to opposing all forms of extremism. The BNP, recognising our genuine commitment to continue to be a multi-racial, multi-ethnic and diverse organisation, have threatened to kick out any of their members who might decide to join the EDL.

As well as representing a diverse range of viewpoints, we aim to represent people of every ethnicity, every religion, every political persuasion, and every social class. Radical Islam only discriminates between radical Muslims and everyone else (including ordinary Muslims) – and so should we.

We could not fulfill this commitment if we were to favour any one group of people over everyone else. Our Mission Statement makes clear that we need to protect and promote the human rights of everyone – regardless of who they are. We will continue to allow people to found specialist EDL divisions that reflect their own particular religious or other views, but we will not allow these groups to dictate what it is we believe, or what it is that the EDL exists to do. Our stance will not change. We will not allow anyone who claims to represent the EDL distort our Mission Statement or undermine the unity that has made the English Defence League the world’s leading Counter-Jihad protest movement.

It is disingenuous, offensive and intellectually corrupt to mistake the views and actions of individuals from the views and actions of the EDL. We will continue to promote diversity of opinion whilst at the same time ensuring that we actively oppose those who challenge the fundamental rights and freedoms that we wish to see protected. It is therefore incredibly disappointing that certain members of the wider Counter-Jihad have taken our decision to distance ourselves from individuals who would put our motives in question as evidence that people with more extreme views were exercising their influence. The charge that the EDL is sheltering antisemites or Nazis (an accusation made by a few blogs) is as ridiculous as it is offensive. We would have hoped that those with extensive experience of having their efforts undermined by those who would wish to misrepresent their motives would not have been so quick to jump to conclusions.

We do not believe that it would be in anyone’s interest to publish details of private conversations, accusations, or some of the more odious things that have been posted on the Internet. Suffice to say, we believe it is more important to judge an organisation on the contribution that it makes and on its proven successes than on unfounded accusations and slurs. Luckily, there are some in the public eye who recognise exactly that. But there are far too many people who in unthinkingly repeat an accusation, give it far more credence than it ever deserved.

This is exactly what has happened with the accusation of Nazism. Very, very few people subscribe to a view that could fairly be compared to Nazism, and yet organisations such as the UAF still manage to see Nazis everywhere they look.

The accusation that the English Defence League subscribes to any views that could be regarded as fascist, racist or neo-Nazi is hurtful, disrespectful, and completely untrue. We are fed up with defending ourselves against these baseless accusations. However, the continuous lies from the far Left and from certain sections of mainstream media do little except to advertise the EDL to those who do actually hold these kinds of views. We must therefore continue to refute these baseless claims, if only to make clear to people who do hold these kinds of views that the EDL is not the place for them.

That is why we made a very clear visual statement right back in the early days of the movement:

That Nazis are not welcome in the EDL is a point that we have returned to time and time again. No wonder members of the notorious white supremacist forum Stormfront despise the EDL, calling us “traitors to the cause” for rejecting their racist ideas. Here’s a story from back in 2009 showing what happened when racists from Combat 18 confronted EDL members who were drinking with a group of Muslims:

EDL members meeting with Muslims are attacked by neo-Nazis 

We have done a great deal more to fight these kinds of ideologies than any of the so-called ‘anti-fascist’ organisations that do such a good job of turning a blind eye to the Islamofascism that continues to breed unopposed in our towns and cities.

No EDL member has ever been arrested for a Nazi salute whilst attending an EDL demo – but a member of the UAF has!

Despite this, and despite our most vocal opponents contributing little to the debate aside from repetitive name-calling, the accusations keep on coming. We continue to hear that we’re racists, fascists, or Islamophobes. We continue to be condemned for allegedly being exactly the sort of people we work hard to oppose. The only difference is that we go beyond name-calling, and actually work to make a difference to our communities. We educate our members, we lobby politicians and the media, and we look to a better future – a future where we can be better assured that our fundamental rights and freedoms are being safeguarded by the people we have elected to represent us.

UAF Protester Fined For Nazi Salute 

Where is the positive vision from the UAF? All we ever hear is how they’re going to “smash” us! Of course, the positive vision doesn’t exist. Why? Because it’s easier to call people names than it is to consider their arguments and try to determine how we can overcome the problems that blight our communities and cause us all to live under constant terror warnings.

It’s also easier to understand conflicts by looking at old divisions than it is to be prepared to understand new realities. We are not the National Front, we are not the BNP – nor have we ever been. We are not looking for people to blame, we are looking for solutions. Angrily calling us Nazis because we dare to think our country is worth defending amounts to little more than shooting the messenger.

And that is dangerous.

The more you suppress specific criticism of an ideology, the easier it becomes for that ideology to be completely insulated from any criticism. The more you define critics of Islam, or critics of the government’s approach to radical Islam, as Islamophobes, the more you encourage ordinary Muslims into inaction. No one wants British Muslims to be victimised because of the growing influence of the radicals within their communities – but they should at least feel the imperative to start taking serious action to expel the radicals and determine what needs to change to ensure peaceful integration rather than purposeful segregation and the hostility and misunderstanding that results.

The more the media, the government, and the so-called anti-fascists claim that the EDL is a Nazi organisation, the more they encourage segregation, because this encourages the view that the concerns of ordinary people are born of prejudice and are not worth addressing.

This could not be further from the truth. The people of this country are a tolerant people. The unprecedented success of the EDL as a street movement is not an indication that people have become less tolerant, but that the government has increasingly started to demand that we tolerate the intolerable.

Unlike fascist ideologies, we value each and every person as an individual. We are therefore understandably hostile to any ideology that threatens fundamental human rights, or which wishes to politicise the idea of ‘Allah’s will’ so that it governs every element of a person’s life, whether they believe in Islam or not.

We believe that each individual should be able to choose to live in accordance with the teachings of a religion should he or she wish, but that religion should never be a force of oppression or the justification to take human life.

That is how you defeat radical Islam – by challenging that part of its ideology that denies the sanctity of life and which preaches submission to draconian laws – laws which violate the fundamental rights and freedoms upon which our country depends on for its very existence.

To defend what we have, to defend what we so often take for granted, and to do so with utmost respect for the rights of the individual – that is not the hallmark of Nazism, it is the exact opposite – it is the prime objective of the English Defence League.

First and foremost we exist to give a voice to ordinary people. Ordinary people who do not have people speaking up for them. Ordinary people who see the problems with Islam all too clearly, but have been let down by politicians. Ordinary people who are constantly robbed of the opportunity to help safeguard their communities and their country.

We will never forget why England needs its Defence League.

Much has changed since we were founded in 2009, but we have stayed true to our founding principles. We are now as we were then – a non-violent, anti-racist and anti-Nazi national movement, dedicated to defeating a threat that our government is so unwilling to address that it can barely speak its name.

In households across the country radical Islam passed the dinner table test many years ago – it is on everyone’s lips except the government’s.

It is a fascination for many who have not yet experienced it firsthand. And for those who have, it is a threat made more real by the silence of the government, the media, the Muslim Community, and those who those who brush aside the problem as the result of ‘Islamophobia’.

Modern-day Nazis are not draped in the flag of their country. Their interest is not with nations, nor is it with races – it is with religion. They carry the black flag of the Islamic Caliphate – like the ones flown when they burnt poppies during the Remembrance Day two minutes silence.

The modern-day Nazis are the Islamofascists – the radical Muslims who want to impose their religion on you and me, who want to subjugate women, and who want to remove our laws and replace them with the Sharia.

Our message to the modern-day Nazis is exactly the same as our message to those who believe in the twisted ideology of Nazi-Germany: our forefathers fought to protect our freedoms and our country, and we will never dishonour their sacrifice.

Now, as it was then, we are lucky in that we can count on the support of friends and allies from around the world. Britain has long been a stepping stone between the powers of Europe and America, and we are uniquely placed to help bring together people from either side of the Atlantic in order to respond to a truly global threat.

Nazi Germany was defeated not only because of the bravery and resolve of previous generations, but because of the unity that helped ensure that everyone who fought on the side of freedom never had cause to doubt the strength of their convictions.

As Tommy has said many times, Nazism and Islamism are two sides of the same coin. Like any aggressive ideology, radical Islam thrives on division. As soon as we forget our shared values, the fundamental rights and freedoms that we all too often take for granted, we forget what it is that we are fighting for – the liberal democratic ideals upon which modern Britain was built, and upon which its future depends.

We are the English Defence League, and we will stand firm – because we know who we are, and we know what it is we defend.

No surrender.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Londonistan Calling

by Speranza ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Dhimmitude, Islamic Invasion, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Political Correctness, Special Report, UK at July 8th, 2011 - 9:00 am

As Britain slowly drifts into national suicide,  we can see the dark shadows of the coming times here in America under Obama.

by Hal G. P. Colebatch

British police — sarcastically described as the enforcement arm of the left-wing Guardian because of their zeal in prosecuting political incorrectness — have been accused of suppressing information about a wave of threats, abuse and violence in Islamicising areas of London, in particular the borough of Tower Hamlets.

Victims say police in the borough, fearing racism allegations, have ignored or downplayed cases where people — Muslim and non-Muslim alike — have been threatened or beaten for breaching “Islamic norms.” One such victim, Mohammed Monzur Rahman, was left partially blind after being beaten by a mob for smoking during Ramadan. According to a local anti-extremism campaigner, Rahman reported the incident to police, but was told they could not take action because there were no witnesses — absurd, considering that the street was lined with closed-circuit TV cameras and filled with people.

Already Muslim immigration, concentrated in “Londonistan” and other big-city areas, has reached a point where it is unsafe for Englishwomen to walk in many streets uncovered or for Jews to venture out wearing such identifying symbols as skull-caps. A video is being shown on the Internet of police apparently running in terror through the London streets from a mob bearing placards proclaiming BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT ISLAM and similar slogans. Even politically-liberal comedian John Cleese recently declared: “London is no longer an English city.”

The take-over of large inner-city areas by Islamic extremists, with the concomitant terrorisation of law-abiding Muslims as well as others, has come about as a result of the previous Labour Government’s “Open Door” policy. Like some other Labour policies, Open Door appears to have been predicated on the deliberate altering of voting demographics. It has succeeded perhaps beyond its architects’ wishes. Since Labour enacted the policy in 1997, more than 5.2 million immigrants have arrived in the United Kingdom. When the departures of those moving abroad are taken into account, Open Door has left the foreign-born population in the UK 3.2 million higher, in a country with a total population of only about 60 million. If even one in a hundred of those 3.2 million is an Islamic extremist, that would yield a total of 320,000 new radicals — several times the headcount of the entire British Army.

Britain has not seen an invasion like this since ancient times.

[......]

In the 1930s, out of office and futureless, Winston Churchill turned his hand to writing a history of the English-speaking people. When he got to Alfred the Great he remarked on the British genius for producing great leaders in times of confusion and decay. One can only go on hoping.

Read the rest – Londonistan Calling