► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for the ‘English Defence League’ Category

UKIP on the Rise?

by coldwarrior ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Economy, Education, Elections 2012, English Defence League, Multiculturalism, Open thread, Politics, Religion, Special Report, UK at November 29th, 2012 - 3:00 pm

Interesting news…

Could this be Ukip’s day?

Rotherham is usually a staunch Labour town, but ahead of Thursday’s by-election, many locals are in the mood for change

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? - Could this be Ukip’s day?

Is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party could pull off a victory in Rotherham? Photo: Guzelian

It is a ramshackle campaign office, with a loo that has yet to be plumbed in and two deckchairs for seating. But this little property is one of the busiest places in Rotherham, with a stream of volunteers coming in and out, and camera crews setting up outside.

The former clothes boutique – “two floors of fashion” is still written on the front window – is home to the UK Independence Party’s campaign in the South Yorkshire town. Today, Rotherham goes to the polls in a parliamentary by-election. That all the talk is about Ukip rather than Labour, which has provided the town’s MP since 1933, is a remarkable turn of events.

The by-election has been called because Denis MacShane, who as a Labour MP at one point enjoyed a 71 per share of the vote, has stepped down in disgrace after he fiddled his expenses. The assumption until a week ago was that however much the town disapproves of his behaviour, it would return another Labour MP. “You could put a red rosette on a donkey and it would get voted in,” says Peter Downey, owner of The Master Barber’s Shop.

However, Lisa Duffy, who is running Ukip’s office, says: “We are on a roll.” She brandishes a cheque for £500. “I’ve received £8,000 in donations just to this office since Saturday.”

This surge in support follows The Daily Telegraph’s report that the Labour-run council in Rotherham had taken three children from their foster parents because the couple were members of Ukip.

Some have cried foul, accusing Ukip of manipulating the foster parents – both former long-term Labour voters – to suit their own ends. But Ms Duffy is clear that the couple’s story has changed Rotherham’s perception of the party. “I think it’s made a huge difference. People are very angry about others telling them how to run their lives, and it’s opened them up to talking about us,” she says.

This PR coup was followed by Stuart Wheeler, Ukip’s treasurer, boasting of a possible eight Tory MPs defecting to the party, and the Conservative vice-chairman Michael Fabricant mooting a possible alliance ahead of the 2015 general election.

So is it possible that a party with no MP and fewer councillors than the Green Party – which finished sixth at the general election in Rotherham – could pull off a victory here?

Of the four people I meet in The Master Barber’s Shop, one is a Labour voter, one would prefer not to say, and the other two – including its owner – say they are voting Ukip. This is not an unusual ratio. Wherever grumbling voters are gathered, you can find a significant clutch who say they are thinking of voting for party recently dismissed by David Cameron as being home to “mainly fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists”.

Mr Downey is clear what the appeal of the party is to this town’s voters: “Ukip are doing well here because of the flood of Eastern Europeans in Rotherham,” he says.

Dave Bennett, who is waiting to have his hair cut, agrees. “My mother-in-law will not now come into the town centre because of the amount of Eastern Europeans hanging around in groups. It’s just large groups of men standing around. People don’t want it.”

Mr Bennett might be dismissed as a “fruitcake” or even a “closet racist” by some in Westminster, but he is an NHS worker and lifelong Labour supporter. His views are echoed time and again on the doorsteps of the old Doncaster Road – in the shadow of the enormous Tata steel works, which announced 110 job losses last week. Many are happy to chat about the foster case and their willingness to vote Ukip.

Bryan and Barbara Archer, in their seventies, are not dissimilar to the foster parents themselves. He used to be in the Navy, she was a school teacher for 24 years; both are former Labour supporters. “It’s an utter disgrace what happened to those children,” Mrs Archer says. “Rotherham Council has done nothing but bring shame to this town. They’ve shown us up with EDL [English Defence League] marches and children being exploited. This used to be a lovely town.”

Rotherham centre is still a handsome, bustling place, dominated by the impressive minster, but you don’t have to travel far to find boarded-up shops and a tattoo parlour that has taken up residence in the Temperance Hall. Its glory days as a coal and steel town are well over.

Victoria Parker, aged 26, who is picking up her child Elise from school, says: “The last job I had was six years ago at McDonald’s. It’s been so hard to get a job.”

Would she consider voting for Jane Collins – “she’s a local Yorkshire lass, from a mining family” – asks Ian Clay, a local solicitor out canvassing for Ukip’s candidate. Like others that Clay meets, Ms Parker gives him a warm reception. “I’m certainly thinking about it.”

The feedback from many of the residents is that it is time for a change. What is curious is that so much of their disaffection has led to support for Ukip – a party that began as a one-issue outfit, and an issue that appears to have little relevance in this town.

The party does now have a proper manifesto, with eye-catching and uncosted promises designed to appeal to disillusioned Tories at the libertarian end of the party: a return to smoking in public places, getting rid of employers’ national insurance contributions, a new flat rate of tax, prison sentences to double, student numbers to halve, free eye tests for all citizens.

But these promises – particularly its two central ones: to put a temporary halt to all immigration, and to hold a referendum about pulling out of Europe – have struck a bell far from its roots in the Home Counties, where many regard it as only a half-serious outfit supported by eccentric celebrities such as Peter Stringfellow, the nightclub owner, and Neil Hamilton, the disgraced former MP.

Mrs Archer says: “You work hard all your life for a comfortable retirement and for what? It’s blown away in the wind. There’s all this money being given away to the EU, which could be spent here.”

The economic chaos in Europe has been helpful to Ukip, which believes it has the wind in its sails. Nigel Farage, its leader, claimed the party was “the third force in British politics” after the Corby by-election earlier this month, when it won 14 per cent of the vote and forced the Lib Dems into an embarrassing, deposit-losing fourth place.

Some psephologists believe that Ukip’s importance is over-stated. Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London, disagrees that it could cause many Tories with slim majorities to lose their seats: “If Ukip withdrew, some of these people might not vote at all, some might – believe it or not – vote Lib Dem, some might vote for a more radical party. Only in a handful of seats did Ukip make a difference. It’s nowhere near the 20 or 30 suggested.”

Despite the momentum, Ukip is still small, with a mere 19,000 members – the equivalent of just a few tables of pub drinkers in each constituency. But these sums appear to hold little truck in Rotherham, where the lack of jobs and prospects are the main concerns.

Jodie Dolby, a 19-year-old unemployed mother, says she’s considering Ukip because, “I think there’s a lot more immigration now.” Does she worry that some might think that curbing immigration is racist?

“No way. My daughter’s dad is Asian. My grandma is Asian. But there are a lot more people coming in, getting properties, and all the money is going back, not staying here.”

Mr Downey in his barber shop is clear that Rotherham is a world away from Westminster: “What is classed as racist is determined by white middle-class people down in London, not by minorities up here.”

Tommy Robinson of the EDL arrested to please Islamists

by Rodan ( 21 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, Dhimmitude, English Defence League, Islamic Supremacism, Special Report, UK at October 23rd, 2012 - 2:41 pm

A British Imamm Saiful Islam, who has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is a supporter of al-Qaeda, was beaten up Saturday morning. He had been advocating overthrowing the British government and creating an Islamic state. Having enough of his garbage, British patriots rightfully beat him up. Since the victim was a Muslim, the UK police went out of their way to find the perpetrators, unlike when Muslims beat up native British.  They accused the EDL of the action and have arrested their leader, Stephen Lennon who calls himself Tommy Robinson.

English Defense League leader Stephen Lennon has been arrested over an alleged assault in Luton on Saturday morning.

It is believed the victim was Saiful Islam, known for preaching his extremist views in Bury Park.

The pair featured in Channel 4 documentary Proud and Prejudiced earlier this year, and a You Tube video of an altercation between the pair in Bury Park last year has been viewed nearly 300,000 times.

A spokesman for Beds Police said a man was assaulted in New Bedford Road at about 10.15am by five men who got out of a black BMW.

To add insult to injury, Stephen Lennon is being held in a mostly Islamic section of the jail he is in.

If this wasn’t bad enough, Kevin Carroll, a candidate for the EDL linked British Freedom party was arrested on Saturday. They linked him to an arrest of 53 EDL members who were on their way to East London that day.

British Freedom Party candidate Kevin Carroll was arrested after about 50 English Defense League (EDL) supporters were stopped by police on Saturday, the party said.

Police said officers arrested 53 men in connection with an operation in London.

A spokesman for the party said Mr Carroll’s election campaign would be “unaffected”.

The spokesman said: “Following Saturday’s events, we learn directly from Kevin Carroll that he has been bailed until 30 November, which means that his election campaign for Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) is unaffected.

“We can confirm that Kevin was not among EDL supporters stopped by police… but was arrested later whilst driving to his home.”

It is obvious the elites in Britain, like those in America, Europe, Latin America and Australia, believe in appeasing the Islamic scum. Patriots who stand up for their nations are politically persecuted. Meanwhile on Friday there will be Imams all throughout the UK calling for an Islamic state. The British police will do nothing.

I really don’t understand the love of Islam Western elites have.

(Hat Tip: Osprey and Gates of Vienna)

EDL in Denmark Saturday…UPDATED thru the day

by coldwarrior ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Christianity, English Defence League, Europe, Free Speech, Headlines, Islam, Patriotism at March 30th, 2012 - 10:36 pm

Good Luck Lads!

READ EDL OFFICIAL SITE HERE
Something to keep an eye on:

 

Anti-fascists mobilise against English Defence League summit in Denmark

 

Hundreds of demonstrators will confront the English Defence League tomorrow as the far-right group holds its first ever European summit in a bid to set up a Continent-wide alliance of anti-Islamic organisations.

Danish activists claimed that as many as 4,000 anti-fascist activists would make their way to the town of Aarhus, where the meeting is due to take place tomorrow afternoon, from the UK, Denmark and Germany.

Organisers said they would march one hour before an EDL rally in the town, in what they predicted would be the country’s largest anti-fascist mobilisation in 15 years.

Danish members of Anti-Fascist Action, the group believed to be heavily involved in violence which followed the eviction of squatters from a Copenhagen youth centre in 2006, plan to take part in the anti-EDL march.

The group has a ferocious reputation for robust opposition to any far-right demonstrations. But members today insisted they would march peacefully.

The group was keeping a look out for EDL members arriving in Denmark last week and set up a hotline for people to report sightings.

A post on the group’s website read: “Up to 50 participants at Saturday’s racist demonstration over the last few days arrived at Copenhagen.

Today, the group reported seeing EDL leader Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – also known as Tommy Robinson – arrive in Copenhagen.

“Already Monday, a group of suspicious looking people – about 40 – observed in central Copenhagen. They were followed by a group of police officers.”

One member said today that they expected to be joined by a broad coalition of left-wing groups and trades unions from Denmark and Germany.

They said that nine buses from Copenhagen were planned to ferry more than 400 demonstrators from the Danish capital to join local residents and members of anti-fascist groups from Denmark and Germany.

Anti-EDL demonstrators from the British group Unite Against Fascism have also travelled to Denmark to confront the group.

The EDL will take a small team into the talks, which Mr Yaxley-Lennon insisted would take place behind closed doors this week. But its delegation will be joined by a larger contingent of supporters who will hold a rally in Aarhus from 2pm, local time.

The talks are expected to be attended by Defence Leagues from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the USA, Italy, Poland and Finland, along with the anti-Muslim groups Stop Islamisation of Europe, Stop Islamisation of the World and the far-right European Freedom Initiative.

They said they wanted to set up a pan-European Defence League to deal with problems they claim are caused by “Islamification”.

It is expected several hundred supporters of the various Defence Leagues will attend. Danish Police advised local residents to stay away from the area of Aarhus expected to be targeted by the demos, saying they expected heavy traffic.

Last week, a group of around 5,000 people attended an anti-EDL concert. The Mayor’s Office said the concert was set up to show that Aarhus “does not want to be associated with extremist groups [which represent] everything we want to distance ourselves from”.

 

 

UPDATE:

 

The festivities start at 1400 Western Europe Time, that is 0800  Saturday.

 

Here is the memorandum of understanding for the participants:

 

European Defence Leagues

Memorandum of Understanding

‘Defending the right to defend free nations’

Memorandum of Understanding relating to the formation of a European network of advocates for human rights and personal freedoms, in opposition to Sharia Law and other forms of oppression.

Recognising the need to make a statement outlining the shared principles that will act as the foundations for future cooperation, the above-listed organisations have agreed the following:

We believe that our nations, our people and our traditions, are all in need of defence.

Islamic extremism threatens our rights, our freedoms, and even our very lives.

But it would not be so dangerous a foe if, unlike previous generations, we had not become paralysed in the face of this extremism.

We are paralysed by moral relativism, political correctness, cowardly appeasement, strict self-censorship and self-loathing.

We should not be afraid to speak our minds, to fly the flags of our nations, to say plainly what we believe to be right and what we believe to be wrong.

But instead, we seem ashamed of our identities, our traditions, our heritage.

We are tolerant and accepting, but often only because we fear to make a stand against intolerance and hatred.

We have, it seems, already begun to surrender.

It is almost as if we no longer believe in all that should make us proud; all that makes our countries distinct, and all that unites them.

Our politicians refuse even to talk about it.

Our newspapers insult and attack those who refuse to bow down – those who refuse to submit or surrender their freedoms – as if they are responsible for the assaults on freedom about which they protest.

And all the while, we let the radicals decide the modern face of Islam in Europe.

We all know that a battle is being waged, not between Muslim and non-Muslim, but between fundamentalist and reformer.

But what are we willing to do?

The more we capitulate, the more we appease, the harder the reformer has to fight.

The more we abandon our own principles, the more we forget our pride, the more confident the fundamentalist becomes.

That is why we need to be loud.

We need to send a message to the fundamentalists, to our governments, to the press, and to anyone who may have given up on the people of Europe:

We believe in the rights enshrined in the laws of our nations.

We believe in the freedoms long-enjoyed in our lands.

And we believe in the democratic traditions that best protect both our rights and freedoms.

We believe in equality under the law and due process, regardless of race or religion.

We believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of conscience and freedom of worship.

And we believe that it is our right to speak out against those who would threaten these freedoms, as well as those who would enable them to do so.

In 2004, the European Court of Human Rights declared that “freedom of thought, of religion, of expression and of association as guaranteed by the [European] Convention [on Human Rights] could not deprive the authorities of a State in which an association, through its activities, jeopardised that State’s institutions, of the right to protect those institutions.”

In other words, the European Court of Human Rights recognised that we have a right to defend our democratic institutions from those who, in attacking these institutions, would exploit the rights and freedoms granted to them in the Western world.

Unfortunately, much of the modern Islamic world continues to deny the rights of its people and to suppress their freedoms.

And there are also some – not just the supporters of Sharia Law – who wish to see this model of oppressive, divisive, supremacist religious totalitarianism imported into Europe.

Within some Muslim communities it has already begun.

Honour killings, child grooming, hate preachers, home-grown terrorists, and women encased in the Burqa.

Much of the time it is Muslims themselves who are the first victims.

We must not be afraid to say what should be obvious to all:

Our way is better.

Not different, better.

Individual Muslims may well have plenty to offer, but there is much about Islamic culture that we cannot stay silent about.

We are committed to countering extremism, wherever it be found.

And we will guard against anything that would threaten our diverse and tolerant nations.

We are anti-extremist, anti-fascist, and anti-racist.

We will protest peacefully, but we will defend ourselves if need be.

We will be loud, and we will not back down.

Because the defence of our countries, our people, our rights, our freedoms, our values, and our futures demands nothing less.

JDL Canada Chanukah Party *TONIGHT* December 26, 2011 Toronto

by 1389AD Comments Off
Filed under Canada, English Defence League, Headlines, Islam, Israel, Judaism at December 26th, 2011 - 1:52 am

Please attend the JDL
CHANUKAH PARTY FOR FREEDOM

The JDL will light a candle for Tommy Robinson
as we light the Menorah.

This is a time for all of us to come together.

Monday, December 26, 2011 7:30pm until 9:30pm

Toronto Zionist Centre
(416) 736-7000
788 Marlee Avenue
Toronto, ON M6B-3K1
(Marlee and Lawrence)

It’s time to reflect, eat some good food and support our friends. Many times, the mainstream media outlets refuse to post pro-Israel information. And thank G-d we have many pro-Israel bloggers on our side. And when they stand with us, we also must stand with them. It has been a very active year for JDL.

Let us pull together!

Breaking: Tommy Robinson attacked by “youths”:
He needs our prayers

Michael Coren On Tommy Robinson & Islam

Uploaded by blazingcatfur on Dec 23, 2011


EDL Frontman Tommy Robinson Assaulted By….guess who?

by coldwarrior ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under British Islamic Jihadists, English Defence League, Free Speech, Headlines, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, UK at December 23rd, 2011 - 12:54 am

h/t Zimriel. This is the as of yet unconfirmed story. More details to follow, i am sure.

Details at Gates of Vienna

 

He was out driving, when he saw a car similar to his wife’s, driven by a blond white girl. The other car flashed its lights so Tommy pulled over.

A group of Pakistani youths wearing knuckle dusters poured out. Tommy was knocked out pretty quickly, and they gave him a good kicking.

He looks pretty beaten up, but no bones were broken, and no eyes or teeth are missing. He had a brain scan this morning. We don’t know the results yet.

He has spoken to The Sun, who asked whether he had called the police. Tommy said there was no point, as a racial attack on a white guy was of no interest to them.

Update 3:50pm EST:

The EDL is urging its supporters to remain calm.

We all want Tommy to go to the police. We need to learn whether the police will act against the perpetrators of this heinous act. If not, it is yet more evidence that there is a two-tier system of justice in England.

Update 3:26pm EST:

Message from Tommy: “They were shouting ‘allahu akhbar’ and ‘Merry Christmas, Tommy’”.

Also: He had a C.T. scan, and apparently has “bruising of the brain”. He got out of hospital this afternoon.

 

Merry Christmas indeed.

 

 

Tommy Robinson on a Hunger Strike

by Rodan ( 52 Comments › )
Filed under English Defence League, Europe, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, UK at September 11th, 2011 - 4:51 am

British patriot Stephen Lennon AKA. Tommy Robinson is on a hunger strike. The English Defense Leader is on a hunger strike. He is protesting his status as a political prisoner.

THE leader of the English Defence League, Stephen Lennon, is on hunger strike and is claiming to be a “political prisoner of the state”, following his arrest after a protest in London on Saturday.

Mr Lennon, who also calls himself Tommy Robinson, was remanded in custody at Luton Magistrates Court this morning (Monday, September 5) after appearing charged with breaching bail conditions imposed on him by Blackburn Magistrates Court, where he is due to go on trial on September 29.

The trial relates to an EDL protest in the Lancashire town on April 2, during which it is alleged he assaulted a man, a charge he denies.

In response to an enquiry from Luton Today, EDL spokesperson Helen Gower said: “Tommy is on a hunger strike and will only be accepting water.”

She added: “He is now a ‘political prisoner’ of the state and isn’t prison food halal, something which Tommy feels very strongly about and campaigns against.”

If he was Muslim, Tommy would have been released.

10 years after 9/11, a British Nationalist is locked up for standing up to Islamic Imperialism. This is a disgrace. This is more evidence of the Islamic influence onthe UK and American elites.

Here’s a video of why the EDL started.

In Hoc Signo Vinces, is what the EDL has on their shield. Asa Latin that term is dear to me. in 312 AD. the Roman Emperor Constantine had that phrase on his banner. The EDL will conquer Islam in Britain.

God Bless the EDL!

As the tenth anniversary of 9/11/01 approaches…

by 1389AD ( 36 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Canada, English Defence League, Israel, September 11 at September 10th, 2011 - 3:00 pm

Please visit these links:


Peaceful Muslims attack EDL

by Kafir ( 14 Comments › )
Filed under English Defence League, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Liberal Fascism, Special Report, UK at September 9th, 2011 - 3:00 pm

Muslims Attack EDL Bus In London, EDL Members Arrested

A mob of angry “Asians” — the media’s code-word for Muslims — in England attacked a busload of members of the English Defense League who were traveling through an Muslim neighborhood in London on their return from a rally.

The “Asians” launched rocks and bottles at the bus, which broke down in the dangerous place, and then attacked a white woman who exited the bus. Police arrested the victims of the attack and not the attackers.

The sudden upsurge of hornet-like violence is yet another sign the EDL is hitting a nerve. It is protesting the Islamization of England, and the “Asians” don’t like it.

[...]

The brazen attack was unprovoked and obviously a sign of growing Muslim muscle in England.

The bus broke down in Tower Hamlets, a Muslim-controlled territory where homosexuals are afraid to walk the streets, a Christian teacher was attacked and beaten to within an inch of his life, and Muslims try to enforce Sharia law.

“The yellow, red and black bus, carrying around 44 EDL members, was showered with stones as angry teenagers threw traffic cones and bricks, shattering the windows of the bus, the Daily Mail reported.

Oh how sweet.

Not.

The EDL Clarifies its Position on Israel/ and the EDL Jewish Division Fallout

by coldwarrior ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, British Islamic Jihadists, English Defence League, Islam, Islamists, Judaism, Special Report, UK at August 10th, 2011 - 12:06 pm

Now that they have clarified, lets move on. It is a long read, so I put it in over here in Special Report

 

(This was written after the EDL leadership dismissed Roberta Moore, leader of the EDL’s Jewish Division some weeks ago)

 

Taken Straight from their Webpage:

 

Pre-Word

In recent weeks there has been a great deal of speculation about the EDL’s position on Israel, and the role that the EDL Jewish Division has played in determining our direction.

The following statement is intended to set the record straight. The statement was prepared by the EDL Editorial Team according to the wishes of the leadership, and has been fully approved by EDL Joint-Leader Kevin Carroll.

We do not believe it would be appropriate to single out any individuals involved in recent events, and believe it to be in everyone’s interests that any further concerns be communicated privately.

Thank you,

EDL Editorial Team


Standing Firm

We wish to make this as clear as it can be:

We support Israel’s right to exist, and we support Israel’s right to defend itself.

But there is no reason why we cannot continue to support Israel whilst still being fully committed to halting the advance of radical Islam in our own country.

We support Israel, but England will always come first.

We will never risk the future of the EDL by pursuing an agenda that has little to do with the realities facing our country, and which would, quite rightly, do a great deal to jeopardise our cause.

The English Defence League also has the right to defend itself, and we will not allow the interests of a small minority override the concerns of the majority of our supporters.

Our focus is on England. It always has been and it always will be.

In many ways there are parallels to be drawn between the radicalisation that has infected the Palestinians and their supporters and the radicalisation that continues to breed in British Mosques. In this way at least, the people of England and the people of Israel have a great deal in common.

Whatever we may think of the conflict, the people of Israel face the threat of Islam-inspired terrorism every single day. With the possible exception of other Muslims, it is the Jewish people that have suffered more than anyone else at the hands of radical Islam. Even in the UK prominent Muslim organisations continue to boycott Holocaust Memorial Day, preferring instead to attend Al Quds Day marches, where they publicly support proscribed terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah, celebrate tyrants like Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini, or support pariah Islamic states with appalling human rights records. And in European nations wherever there are increases in the Muslim population, so too are there increases in the number of antisemitic incidents reported.

The war against radical Islam has no borders, even if Israel is the front line of the battle. It is an international problem, and it would be foolish of us not to ally ourselves with like-minded individuals and organisations across the world. Already, we have seen supporters from all over the world travel to this country to stand side by side with us at our demonstrations. We are thankful for their support, and have reciprocated by joining the demonstration against the Ground Zero Mosque and attending La Marche des Cochons.

We should not be afraid to show solidarity with ordinary people who are continuing to suffer at the hands of radical Islam, wherever they may be. Wherever there are Muslims who support a hostile, aggressive, 7th century interpretation of Islam, we will do what we can to aid those who are working to defeat it – be they Christian, Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Americans, Europeans, Brits, Israelis – whoever they are.

In combating the global jihad, we find that we have friends in many distant lands, and that our goals often coincide. Radical Islam may regard the USA as the ‘Great Satan’, but at the root of the conflict is their view that Islam must come to dominate Judeo-Christian civilisation. The global ‘war on terror’ that followed the September 11th attacks was not simply aimed at defending the USA and her allies, but at defeating those who so despise the Judeo-Christian heritage that defines the Western World. It is therefore no wonder that following the fallout from the September 11th attacks many Western nations learned a great deal from Israel – a country with extensive experience of dealing with the realities of terrorism.

If Israel succumbs to the forces of radical Islam and the proponents of Sharia then the “only working democracy in the Middle East” will fall. The impact of such a thing would be felt across the world, and would massively embolden those who hate the freedoms we enjoy in the Western world. It is in all our interests that the nation on the front line of the battle against radical Islam should not fall.

However, our immediate concern will always be with the impact that radical Islam is having at home. Whilst we have a great number of international friends and supporters, and have done our bit to help inspire the establishment of many national defence leagues around the world, our principle concern has always been representing the people that make up our membership – the people of England.

We therefore refuse to be drawn into alliances with individuals or organisations who in their laudable defence of Israel overstep the boundaries of what we believe to be legitimate and reasonable. Extremism cannot be fought with extremism.

The decision made by individuals within the EDL Jewish Division to ally themselves with the JTF (Jewish Task Force), an organisation whose leader, Victor Vancier, was imprisoned on terrorism charges, was made without the authority of the EDL Leadership, and we have ensured that all ties have been severed with that organisation. Israel itself has proscribed the JTF as a terrorist organisation, and Vancier has been recorded making incredibly offensive and inflammatory statements about black people, Christians, and homosexuals. This could hardly be further from the objectives and beliefs of the English Defence League, and it is hugely disappointing that in the fallout of this sorry episode a small number of Jewish Division members saw fit to make personal attacks on members of the EDL Support Group for criticising their decision to align themselves with known extremists.

We once again wish to make it entirely clear that we never have and never will support any individuals or organisations that advocate violence, be it in defence of the Jewish people or in order to advance any other cause (including, of course, attacks against Muslims). Whilst we acknowledge the difference between a non-violent approach and total pacifism, we maintain that the only time violence can be justified is in immediate self-defence, and subject to the laws of the land. We believe that the JTF’s stance and the personal example of its leader go well beyond this. Our commitment has always been to peaceful protest, and we will never do anything to undermine this.

Following these disagreements the leader of the EDL Jewish Division decided to step down and leave both the Jewish Division and the EDL. Our objectives were clearly not the same.

We of course recognise the value of listening to people with different viewpoints, and we certainly respect those who have a genuine commitment to helping to defeat the spread of radical Islam – whoever they may be, and wherever they are in the world. But this does mean that we are willing to turn a blind eye to other forms of extremism. For example, back in December of last year, controversial US pastor Terry Jones enquired about the possibility of speaking at an EDL demonstration. Somehow, the media got wind of this and, quite inaccurately, reported that we had agreed.

The reasons why we did not wish to invite the pastor to speak at one of our demonstrations was made clear at the time – and, in some cases, was accurately reported in the press. Not only do we believe that burning the Qur’an is wrong (and sends out completely the wrong message), but we also believe that it would be wrong to provide a platform to anyone who, like Victor Vancier of the JTF, has made incredibly offensive and intolerant statements about homosexuality. We also certainly do not wish to be associated with a man who has known links to the Westboro Baptist Church – an organisation which, amongst other things, pickets the funerals of US service personnel.

Regardless of all the possible disagreements and positions that people can take on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, no one could possibly claim that any objection that they might have to US or UK involvement in these conflicts could justify taunting the mourning families of those who have lost their lives.

Likewise, although there is certainly a great deal of disagreement within the EDL about the situation in Israel, even an EDL member who might happen to be incredibly critical of Israel would never claim that such a view could justify any mistreatment of Jewish people, or their exclusion from the EDL. In fact, members of the Jewish community have long been an important and integral part of the EDL – and so they shall remain.

The actions of a small minority of individuals should not be seen to sully the reputation of the majority of the EDL’s Jewish supporters, whose commitment to the objectives of the EDL is not in doubt. We would never think of censoring open debate by failing to permit criticism of Israel, but we will continue to be vigilant against infiltration by those who hold antisemitic views.

Unlike organisations such as the UAF or BNP, whose antisemitism is often plain to see, the only evidence ever produced to accuse the EDL of holding such views has been gathered from Facebook – hardly the most compelling of evidence. Why would anyone who does hold antisemitic views join an organisation that has always made clear its support for Israel and which has flown the Star of David since its earliest demonstrations?

The small number of people who have made antisemitic comments whilst falsely purporting to represent the EDL are either grossly misinformed about the nature of the movement, wish to undermine our progress, or suffer from the delusion that the EDL can be steered away from its commitment to opposing all forms of extremism. The BNP, recognising our genuine commitment to continue to be a multi-racial, multi-ethnic and diverse organisation, have threatened to kick out any of their members who might decide to join the EDL.

As well as representing a diverse range of viewpoints, we aim to represent people of every ethnicity, every religion, every political persuasion, and every social class. Radical Islam only discriminates between radical Muslims and everyone else (including ordinary Muslims) – and so should we.

We could not fulfill this commitment if we were to favour any one group of people over everyone else. Our Mission Statement makes clear that we need to protect and promote the human rights of everyone – regardless of who they are. We will continue to allow people to found specialist EDL divisions that reflect their own particular religious or other views, but we will not allow these groups to dictate what it is we believe, or what it is that the EDL exists to do. Our stance will not change. We will not allow anyone who claims to represent the EDL distort our Mission Statement or undermine the unity that has made the English Defence League the world’s leading Counter-Jihad protest movement.

It is disingenuous, offensive and intellectually corrupt to mistake the views and actions of individuals from the views and actions of the EDL. We will continue to promote diversity of opinion whilst at the same time ensuring that we actively oppose those who challenge the fundamental rights and freedoms that we wish to see protected. It is therefore incredibly disappointing that certain members of the wider Counter-Jihad have taken our decision to distance ourselves from individuals who would put our motives in question as evidence that people with more extreme views were exercising their influence. The charge that the EDL is sheltering antisemites or Nazis (an accusation made by a few blogs) is as ridiculous as it is offensive. We would have hoped that those with extensive experience of having their efforts undermined by those who would wish to misrepresent their motives would not have been so quick to jump to conclusions.

We do not believe that it would be in anyone’s interest to publish details of private conversations, accusations, or some of the more odious things that have been posted on the Internet. Suffice to say, we believe it is more important to judge an organisation on the contribution that it makes and on its proven successes than on unfounded accusations and slurs. Luckily, there are some in the public eye who recognise exactly that. But there are far too many people who in unthinkingly repeat an accusation, give it far more credence than it ever deserved.

This is exactly what has happened with the accusation of Nazism. Very, very few people subscribe to a view that could fairly be compared to Nazism, and yet organisations such as the UAF still manage to see Nazis everywhere they look.

The accusation that the English Defence League subscribes to any views that could be regarded as fascist, racist or neo-Nazi is hurtful, disrespectful, and completely untrue. We are fed up with defending ourselves against these baseless accusations. However, the continuous lies from the far Left and from certain sections of mainstream media do little except to advertise the EDL to those who do actually hold these kinds of views. We must therefore continue to refute these baseless claims, if only to make clear to people who do hold these kinds of views that the EDL is not the place for them.

That is why we made a very clear visual statement right back in the early days of the movement:

That Nazis are not welcome in the EDL is a point that we have returned to time and time again. No wonder members of the notorious white supremacist forum Stormfront despise the EDL, calling us “traitors to the cause” for rejecting their racist ideas. Here’s a story from back in 2009 showing what happened when racists from Combat 18 confronted EDL members who were drinking with a group of Muslims:

EDL members meeting with Muslims are attacked by neo-Nazis 

We have done a great deal more to fight these kinds of ideologies than any of the so-called ‘anti-fascist’ organisations that do such a good job of turning a blind eye to the Islamofascism that continues to breed unopposed in our towns and cities.

No EDL member has ever been arrested for a Nazi salute whilst attending an EDL demo – but a member of the UAF has!

Despite this, and despite our most vocal opponents contributing little to the debate aside from repetitive name-calling, the accusations keep on coming. We continue to hear that we’re racists, fascists, or Islamophobes. We continue to be condemned for allegedly being exactly the sort of people we work hard to oppose. The only difference is that we go beyond name-calling, and actually work to make a difference to our communities. We educate our members, we lobby politicians and the media, and we look to a better future – a future where we can be better assured that our fundamental rights and freedoms are being safeguarded by the people we have elected to represent us.

UAF Protester Fined For Nazi Salute 

Where is the positive vision from the UAF? All we ever hear is how they’re going to “smash” us! Of course, the positive vision doesn’t exist. Why? Because it’s easier to call people names than it is to consider their arguments and try to determine how we can overcome the problems that blight our communities and cause us all to live under constant terror warnings.

It’s also easier to understand conflicts by looking at old divisions than it is to be prepared to understand new realities. We are not the National Front, we are not the BNP – nor have we ever been. We are not looking for people to blame, we are looking for solutions. Angrily calling us Nazis because we dare to think our country is worth defending amounts to little more than shooting the messenger.

And that is dangerous.

The more you suppress specific criticism of an ideology, the easier it becomes for that ideology to be completely insulated from any criticism. The more you define critics of Islam, or critics of the government’s approach to radical Islam, as Islamophobes, the more you encourage ordinary Muslims into inaction. No one wants British Muslims to be victimised because of the growing influence of the radicals within their communities – but they should at least feel the imperative to start taking serious action to expel the radicals and determine what needs to change to ensure peaceful integration rather than purposeful segregation and the hostility and misunderstanding that results.

The more the media, the government, and the so-called anti-fascists claim that the EDL is a Nazi organisation, the more they encourage segregation, because this encourages the view that the concerns of ordinary people are born of prejudice and are not worth addressing.

This could not be further from the truth. The people of this country are a tolerant people. The unprecedented success of the EDL as a street movement is not an indication that people have become less tolerant, but that the government has increasingly started to demand that we tolerate the intolerable.

Unlike fascist ideologies, we value each and every person as an individual. We are therefore understandably hostile to any ideology that threatens fundamental human rights, or which wishes to politicise the idea of ‘Allah’s will’ so that it governs every element of a person’s life, whether they believe in Islam or not.

We believe that each individual should be able to choose to live in accordance with the teachings of a religion should he or she wish, but that religion should never be a force of oppression or the justification to take human life.

That is how you defeat radical Islam – by challenging that part of its ideology that denies the sanctity of life and which preaches submission to draconian laws – laws which violate the fundamental rights and freedoms upon which our country depends on for its very existence.

To defend what we have, to defend what we so often take for granted, and to do so with utmost respect for the rights of the individual – that is not the hallmark of Nazism, it is the exact opposite – it is the prime objective of the English Defence League.

First and foremost we exist to give a voice to ordinary people. Ordinary people who do not have people speaking up for them. Ordinary people who see the problems with Islam all too clearly, but have been let down by politicians. Ordinary people who are constantly robbed of the opportunity to help safeguard their communities and their country.

We will never forget why England needs its Defence League.

Much has changed since we were founded in 2009, but we have stayed true to our founding principles. We are now as we were then – a non-violent, anti-racist and anti-Nazi national movement, dedicated to defeating a threat that our government is so unwilling to address that it can barely speak its name.

In households across the country radical Islam passed the dinner table test many years ago – it is on everyone’s lips except the government’s.

It is a fascination for many who have not yet experienced it firsthand. And for those who have, it is a threat made more real by the silence of the government, the media, the Muslim Community, and those who those who brush aside the problem as the result of ‘Islamophobia’.

Modern-day Nazis are not draped in the flag of their country. Their interest is not with nations, nor is it with races – it is with religion. They carry the black flag of the Islamic Caliphate – like the ones flown when they burnt poppies during the Remembrance Day two minutes silence.

The modern-day Nazis are the Islamofascists – the radical Muslims who want to impose their religion on you and me, who want to subjugate women, and who want to remove our laws and replace them with the Sharia.

Our message to the modern-day Nazis is exactly the same as our message to those who believe in the twisted ideology of Nazi-Germany: our forefathers fought to protect our freedoms and our country, and we will never dishonour their sacrifice.

Now, as it was then, we are lucky in that we can count on the support of friends and allies from around the world. Britain has long been a stepping stone between the powers of Europe and America, and we are uniquely placed to help bring together people from either side of the Atlantic in order to respond to a truly global threat.

Nazi Germany was defeated not only because of the bravery and resolve of previous generations, but because of the unity that helped ensure that everyone who fought on the side of freedom never had cause to doubt the strength of their convictions.

As Tommy has said many times, Nazism and Islamism are two sides of the same coin. Like any aggressive ideology, radical Islam thrives on division. As soon as we forget our shared values, the fundamental rights and freedoms that we all too often take for granted, we forget what it is that we are fighting for – the liberal democratic ideals upon which modern Britain was built, and upon which its future depends.

We are the English Defence League, and we will stand firm – because we know who we are, and we know what it is we defend.

No surrender.

 

 

 

 

 

 

EDL To patrol Luton and Manchester Streets

by Rodan ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under English Defence League, Headlines, UK at August 9th, 2011 - 9:07 pm

With police unable to stop the riots, the EDL has announce they will be patrolling Manchester and Luton. They plan to confront and stop the rioters.

LONDON — The leader of a British far-right group says its members are taking to the streets of British cities in an attempt to quell riots that have spread across the country for four nights.

Stephen Lennon, leader of the English Defense League, told The Associated Press that up to 1,000 members planned to turn out in Luton, where the group is based, and others areas that have suffered unrest, including the northwestern city of Manchester.

Lennon said some members had were already carrying out patrols trying to deter rioters, and that hundreds more would join them Wednesday.

I wish them luck.