We’ll call this one a palate cleanser today, as I’m tired of writing on the heavy stuff. What is striking about this video is that it’s not heavy handed, it’s not edited in a cute way, and it’s not some out of context gotcha snark hit piece. It’s just a guy, asking Hillary’s very own army, why they are about to go out and campaign their collective keisters off to help get her elected our 45th President and why they feel she deserves this honor. The responses are to say the least, hilarious. Enjoy!
Posts Tagged ‘Hillary Clinton’
Filed under Democratic Party, Marxism, Progressives at March 6th, 2014 - 4:00 pm
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Egypt, Hillary Clinton, Iran, Islamists, Israel, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians, Russia, Syria, Turkey at August 26th, 2013 - 11:30 am
One of the reasons I do not complain when Obama goes golfing is because it is less time he has to spent messing up the world.
by Caroline Glick
Aside from the carnage in Benghazi, the most enduring image from Hillary Clinton’s tenure as US secretary of state was the fake remote control she brought with her to Moscow in 2009 with the word “Reset” in misspelled Russian embossed on it.
Clinton’s gimmick was meant to show that under President Barack Obama, American foreign policy would be fundamentally transformed. Since Obama and Clinton blamed much of the world’s troubles on the misdeeds of their country, under their stewardship of US foreign policy, the US would reset everything.
Around the globe, all bets were off.
Five years later we realize that Clinton’s embarrassing gesture was not a gimmick, but a dead serious pledge. Throughout the world, the Obama administration has radically altered America’s policies.
And disaster has followed. Never since America’s establishment has the US appeared so untrustworthy, destructive, irrelevant and impotent.
Consider Syria. Wednesday was the one-year anniversary of Obama’s pledge that the US would seek the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime if Assad used chemical weapons against his opponents.
On Wednesday, Assad’s forces used chemical weapons against civilians around Damascus. According to opposition forces, well over a thousand people were murdered.
Out of habit, the eyes of the world turned to Washington. But Obama has no policy to offer. Obama’s America can do nothing.
America’s powerlessness in Syria is largely Obama’s fault. At the outset of the Syrian civil war two-and-a-half years ago, Obama outsourced the development of Syria’s opposition forces to Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Erdogan. He had other options. A consortium of Syrian Kurds, moderate Sunnis, Christians and others came to Washington and begged for US assistance. But they were ignored.
Both of these goals are transformative.
In the first instance, Obama believes that anti-Americanism stems from America’s actions. By accepting the mantel of global leadership, Obama believes the US insulted other nations. To mitigate their anger, the US should abdicate leadership.
As for courting Islamic fundamentalists, from his earliest days in office Obama insisted that since radical Islam is the most popular movement in the Islamic world, radical Islam is good. Radical Muslims are America’s friends.
Obama embraced Erdogan, an Islamic fascist who has won elections, as his closest ally and most trusted adviser in the Muslim world.
And so, with the full support of the US government, Erdogan stacked Syria’s opposition forces with radical Muslims like himself. Within months the Muslim Brotherhood comprised the majority in Syria’s US-sponsored opposition.
The Muslim Brotherhood has no problem collaborating with al-Qaida, because the latter was formed by Muslim Brothers.
It shares the Brotherhood’s basic ideology.
Since al-Qaida has the most experienced fighters, its rise to leadership and domination of the Syrian opposition was a natural progression.
In other words, Obama’s decision to have Turkey form the Syrian opposition led inevitably to the current situation in which the Iranian- and Russian-backed Syrian regime is fighting an opposition dominated by al-Qaida.
At this point, short of an Iraq-style US invasion of Syria and toppling of the regime, almost any move the US takes to overthrow the government will strengthen al-Qaida. [.......].
A distressing aspect of Obama’s embrace of Erdogan is that Erdogan has not tried to hide the fact that he seeks dictatorial powers and rejects the most basic norms of liberal democracy and civil rights.
Under the façade of democracy, Erdogan has transformed Turkey into one of the most repressive countries in the world. Leading businessmen, generals, journalists, parliamentarians and regular citizens have been systematically rounded up and accused of treason for their “crime” of opposing Turkey’s transformation into an Islamic state. [........] Following the overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt last month, Erdogan has openly admitted that he and his party are part and parcel of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Obama’s approach to world affairs was doubtlessly shaped during his long sojourn in America’s elite universities.
Using the same elitist sensibilities that cause him to blame American “arrogance” for the world’s troubles, and embrace radical Islam as a positive force, Obama has applied conflict resolution techniques developed by professors in ivory towers to real world conflicts that cannot be resolved peacefully.
Obama believed he could use the US’s close relationships with Israel and Turkey to bring about a rapprochement between the former allies. But he was wrong. The Turkish-Israeli alliance ended because Erdogan is a virulent Jew-hater who seeks Israel’s destruction, not because of a misunderstanding.
Obama forced Israel to apologize for defending itself against Turkish aggression, believing that Erdogan would then reinstate full diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. Instead, Erdogan continued his assault on Israel, most recently accusing it of organizing the military coup in Egypt and the anti- Erdogan street protests in Turkey.
As for Egypt, as with Syria, Obama’s foreign policy vision for the US has left Washington with no options for improving the situation on the ground or for securing its own strategic interests. To advance his goal of empowering the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama pushed the Egyptian military to overthrow the regime of US ally Hosni Mubarak and so paved the way for elections that brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power.
Today he opposes the military coup that ousted the Muslim Brotherhood government.
The US claims that it opposes the coup because the military has trampled democracy and human rights. But it is all but silent in the face of the Muslim Brotherhood’s own trampling of the human rights of Egypt’s Christian minority.
Obama ignores the fact that Mohamed Morsi governed as a tyrant far worse than Mubarak.
Wresting an Israeli apology to Turkey was Obama’s only accomplishment during his trip to Israel in March. Secretary of State John Kerry’s one accomplishment since entering office was to restart negotiations between Israel and the PLO. Just as the consequence of Israel’s apology to Turkey was an escalation of Turkey’s anti- Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric, so the consequence of Kerry’s “accomplishment” will be the escalation of Palestinian terrorism and political warfare against Israel.
As Jonathan Tobin noted Wednesday in Commentary, to secure Palestinian agreement to reinstate negotiations, not only did Kerry force Israel to agree to release more than a thousand Palestinian terrorists from prison. He put the US on record supporting the Palestinians’ territorial demands. [........]
The current round of talks will fail of course because like the Turks, the Syrians and the Egyptians, the Palestinians are not interested in resolving their conflict.
They are interested in winning it. They do not want a state. They want to supplant Israel.
Clinton’s Reset button was played up as a gimmick. But it was a solemn oath. And it was fulfilled. And as a result, the world is a much more violent and dangerous place. The US and its allies are more threatened. The US’s enemies from Moscow to Tehran to Venezuela are emboldened.
The time has come to develop the basis for a future US policy that would represent a reset of Obama’s catastrophic actions and attitudes. Given the damage US power and prestige has already suffered, and given that Obama is unlikely to change course in his remaining three years in power, it is clear that reverting to George W. Bush’s foreign policy of sometimes fighting a war on nebulous “terrorists” and sometimes appeasing them will not be sufficient to repair the damage.
The US must not exchange strategic insanity with strategic inconsistency.
Instead, a careful, limited policy based on no-risk and low-risk moves that send clear messages and secure clear interests is in order.
The most obvious no-risk move would be to embrace Israel as America’s most vital and only trustworthy ally in the region. By fully supporting Israel not only would the US strengthen its own position by strengthening the position of the only state in the Middle East that shares its enemies, its interests and its values.
Washington would send a strong signal to states throughout the region and the world that the US can again be trusted.
This support would also secure clear US strategic interests by providing Israel with the political backing it requires to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program. Moreover, it would bring coherence to the US’s counter-terror strategy by ending US support for Palestinian statehood. [........]
Another no-risk move is to support former Soviet satellite states that are now members of NATO. Here, too, the US would be taking an action that is clear and involves no risk. Russia would have few options for opposing such a move. And the US could go a long way toward rebuilding its tattered reputation.
Low risk moves include supporting minorities that do not have a history of violent anti-Americanism and are, in general, opposed to Islamic fascism.
Such groups include the Kurds. In Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Iran, the Kurds represent a national group that has proven its ability to self-govern and to oppose tyranny. With certain, easily identified exceptions, the stronger the Kurds are, the weaker anti-American forces become.
Then there are the Christians. The plight of the Christians in the Islamic world is one of the most depressing chapters in the recent history of the region. In country after country, previously large and relatively peaceful, if discriminated against, Christian minorities are being slaughtered and forced to flee.
Strong, forthright statements of support for Christian communities and condemnations of persecution, including rape, forced conversions, massacre, extortion and destruction of church and private Christian-owned property from Egypt to Indonesia to Pakistan to the Palestinian Authority would make a difference in the lives of millions of people.
It would also go some way toward rehabilitating the US’s reputation as a champion of human rights, after Obama’s embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Under Obama, America has made itself worse than irrelevant. In country after country, it has become dangerous to be a US ally. The world as a whole is a much more dangerous place as a consequence.
Nothing short of a fundamental transformation of US foreign policy will suffice to begin to repair the damage.
Read the rest - Resetting US foreign policy
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Progressives at July 30th, 2013 - 8:30 am
The media and popular culture are in full campaign mode for the “Great Mother” Hillary Clinton. NBC is making a mini-series about Hillary. Not to be undone, now CNN is making a Hillary Clinton movie.
CNN Films has tapped documentary filmmaker Charles H. Ferguson to direct a feature-length documentary about former Hillary Clinton, POLITICO has learned.
“CNN is very pleased to be working with Academy-Award winner Charles Ferguson on the film, which will be released in theaters and air on CNN,” Allison Gollust, the network’s senior vice president of communications, told POLITICO on Monday. The release date has yet to be determined.
The film adds yet another installment to the growing list of Hillary-related television projects and books slated for release before the 2016 presidential campaign. But is also presents a potential image problem for CNN’s News division as it covers Clinton in the run up to her highly anticipated bid for the White House.
CNN was called Clinton News Network for a reason.
(Hat Tip Weasel Zippers via Lobo91)
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Islamists, Progressives at May 14th, 2013 - 7:00 am
For those of you who voted for Barack Obama, I sincerely hope you’re proud of your vote. I hope you find the bag of, “free,” goodies was worth the cost that America can not only ill afford, but also the hidden costs inherent in electing the emotionally broken narcissist produced by a dysfunctional family to our nation’s highest office.
The crime committed by our President is that in two separate instances that we know of so far, Barack Obama put his keen and penetrating mind to the task of performing some political calculus, and determined that it would be better for American citizens to die so that the failures of his policies would go unnoticed just prior to an election. (The other instance of our President performing this calculus and finding murder to be an acceptable part of political expediency was the Fast and Furious scandal. With that little gem of an operation, he decided that a few dead bodies would be useful if they helped him with his gun control legislation.)
While politicians doing bad things in the game of political expediency was not something invented by Barack Obama, he does stand as the first President in our history to make this leap. He is the first President who’s belief that his destiny to fundamentally transform our nation to match his vision gives him license to shirk his duty to protect and defend our Constitution, and actively allow citizens to be killed, so that we might not ever learn that Al Qaeda is not on its heels, and projecting American weakness abroad has indeed wrought a frightful consequent harvest.
In this video, Judge Jeanine Pirro does an excellent job of not only parsing the facts, but in placing the importance and relevance of the accompanying timeline. In short, anyone who still believes that Obama is anything other than a national disgrace is either brain dead, or willfully obtuse. Those who voted for him in 2012 are complicit in his crimes against this country. Those who stayed home or lodged a protest vote are guilty of lesser crimes, but are complicit as well.
The cover up, which included some of the worst lies told to the American Public by any administration during my life time, the arrest, incarceration, and usurpation of a citizen’s first amendment rights, for producing what must be the worst youtube video ever produced, and some of the most egregious witness intimidation ever seen by our 230 year old republic, has not stooped to the level of murder, at least not yet. Make no mistake about it, that was one of the real crimes committed by our President, Barack Obama, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and her Director of Central Intelligence, Leon Panetta. I would include an, “et al,” here, but quite frankly, there are just too many of them complicit on this one. This is the stuff angry mobs wielding torches and pitch forks are made of. This is the Obama Administration in its purest form.
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2016, Headlines, Republican Party at March 21st, 2013 - 12:15 pm
If Hillary Clinton decides to run for President, the 2016 election will be over the minute she declares. With OFA backing her plus Bill Clinton and Obama stumping for her, there’s no way any Republican can win in 2016. A new poll shows her leading either Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush in the state of Florida.
Hillary Clinton has double-digit leads over two favorite sons of Florida in the 2016 presidential race, according to a Quinnipiac University poll on Thursday.
Clinton leads former Gov. Jeb Bush, 51 percent to 40 percent, and tops Sen. Marco Rubio, 52 percent to 41 percent, in the survey of Florida voters.
If Hillary declares, do not be shocked if many prominent Republicans sit it out. She’s practicable invincible and the best bet is to wait until 2020 when an economic crisis and 12 years of Progressive rule will make Americans ready to throw out the Democrats.
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, George W. Bush, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Mitt Romney, Muslim Brotherhood at September 14th, 2012 - 12:00 pm
The Arab Spring which was hailed as a great Democracy movement by the Obama Regime and the Republican Establishment has reared it’s true nature. In the wake of the 9/11 assassination of the US ambassador to Libya, there were more protests again this Friday. Encouraged by apologies from the Obama Regime about a hysterical movie mocking Mohamed as the pedophile he is, there were more protests today. The German Embassy in the Sudan was set on fire. Even worse, the US Embassy in Tunisia was breached and the Black flag of al-Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood/Salafists was raised on its ground!
According to CNN, Tunisian protesters have breached the U.S. Embassy in Tunis.
They have lowered the American flag from its pole and are raising the black flag of the protestors in its place.
This information was provided to CNN by an eyewitness.
Hundreds of protesters headed to the neighborhood that’s home to U.S. Embassy in Tunisia’s capital earlier on Friday, the eyewitness told CNN.
I wonder what Barack Obama, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Ms. Lindsey Graham, Joe Lieberman, George W. Bush and Condi Rice have to say about this? These clowns supported the whole Middle East Democracy nonsense. Them and our elites in Washington are responsible for this monster now unleashed in that region. If Mitt Romney was smart, he would distance himself from supporting the Arab Spring and say that these nations will be treated as hostile nations.
Thank you Obama. You really did keep your promise of standing by the Muslims. John McCain, you really are scum for giving Obama cover for this. The Wilsonian ideology of Democracy spreading and nation building has failed! The Arab Spring is the rebirth of the Caliphate!
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney at June 12th, 2012 - 8:30 am
It is no secret that the vindictive Clinton’s have never reconciled losing the nomination to the “amateur” (as Bill Clinton referred to him) Barack Obama. It makes perfect sense that Bill Clinton wants Romney to win in November. If Obama wins another four years he will be as toxic as George W. Bush was in 2008 (maybe even more so) and no Democrat will stand a chance in 2016. Hillary made a huge mistake taking the position of Secretary of State (in which she has not distinguished herself) and thus tying herself in with Obama. By the way I like that the author finally points out that we have a RNC chairman Reince Priebus who unlike his predecessor Michael Steele, is up to the job.
by Thomas Lifson
Panic is setting in among the people who ran the Democratic Party prior to the miraculous arrival on the scene of Barack Hussein Obama and the perfect storm of events that propelled him into the White House.
These people, starting with Bill Clinton, the master Democratic politician of our era, can read the tea leaves, and the following factors alarm them:
1. Obama has energized his opposition. Despite throwing everything they could into the game, the turnout effort in Wisconsin was handily beaten by those Tea Party nobodies and an RNC head who is actually up to the job.
2. Obama has alienated hugely important constituencies. Labor unions, utterly essentially to the ground game in November, feel betrayed, and are starting to focus more on their own survival than the success of the Obama re-election campaign. The antiwar left feels betrayed over Gitmo, drones, rendition, domestic surveillance, and a host of other issues. They turned out in San Francisco picketing his fundraisers, and spoke of not voting. His Bain Capital attacks are verging into a repudiation of capitalism, so Wall Street and the finance sector are getting alarmed, and the essential flow of political contributions to Democrats from them is drying up.
3. The economy is a disaster, and Obama is doing all the wrong things. The administration is reduced to making implausible claims of spending moderation based on an internet post. The public is fed up with Obama’s performance, and his personal popularity is declining and will tank further as he goes increasingly negative on Romney. Swing voters are almost as negative about Obama as are Romney voters.
4. Obama is out for himself, and himself only. He has even thrown national security under the bus, allowing the leaking of critical information to the press about intelligence operations and cyber-warfare, and feigning outrage in Friday’s presser over the idea that he would do such a thing. Never mind what they say publicly; the insiders know that we are at cyber-war with Iran and China, among others, right now. Following the prosecutorial lynching of Scooter Libby, it is politically impossible to sweep this leak, which actually is causing our allies to shun information-sharing with us, under the rug. Unlike the Valerie Plame case, people have died, and intelligence operations have been seriously harmed.
5. A wave election is shaping up. Democrats could be swept out of office in Congress, and on down to statehouses, city halls, and dog pounds. With the left flank threatening to stay home, union funds and enthusiasm depleted, and Obama offering nothing but negativity, while Tea Partiers mobilize nationally as never before seen on the GOP side, the electorate will skew so far right that the GOP could end up as dominant in 2013 as the Democrats were in 2009.
This, not coincidence, is why several brainy Democrats, including Cory Booker, Deval Patrick, Ed Rendell, and Lanny Davis, have been providing sound bites that can be used by the Romney campaign to destroy the effectiveness of Obama’s attacks on Mitt Romney. The biggest damage has been done by Bill Clinton, whose barrage includes providing the title for the current number-one bestseller about Obama, Ed Klein’s The Amateur, calling Mitt Romney’s business track record at Bain “sterling,” and stating that the Bush tax rates should not be increased, disagreeing with Obama.
He’s laying down the groundwork for Hillary Clinton running for president in 2016. Everything she is doing and everything he is doing argues that they want to run Hillary Clinton for president in 2016, so while he might appear with Obama in fundraisers in New York and elsewhere, he’s basically undermining Obama.
My colleague Richard Baehr believes that Bill Clinton actively wants Obama to lose:
Bill Clinton thinks long term. Hillary will run in 2016, I am certain of it. No one loses the bug after one attempt when they came that close. I am guessing that Clinton thinks that if Obama wins this time, it will be tougher in 2016 for Hillary than if Romney wins. If Obama wins, then Hillary has to run at age 69 against a Rubio or a Ryan – somebody young and charismatic. She goes down in flames, especially if economy is still in the tank.
But if Romney wins, Clinton thinks he will have his hands full, and there is no magic bullet to turn the economy around. He is right. In fact, all the stuff that could happen January 1st with taxes going up and spending cuts could sink the economy into a big hole for another few years. If Obama loses in November, do you think he cooperates with GOP to avoid this? I don’t. If Romney wins, then Hillary runs against him in 2016, after people think GOP did not solve the problems. She wins.
All very logical. But there are only two problems with this scenario.
1. If the Clintons and their allies, like Ed Rendell and Lanny Davis, are believed by black voters to have sabotaged the re-election of the first black president, blacks will turn with fury on the Clintons. I do not imagine for a moment that Barack Obama will quietly sit back and take what he sees as abuse from the Clinton gang. If word is already out that Cory Booker is “dead to” Obama, we can be certain that the president will let his most devoted followers know if he regards the Clintons as traitors, should he lose. No Democrat can be elected president without an overwhelming share of the black vote.
2. Countless other elected Democrats in Congress and down the ticket stand to lose their offices if discouraged Democrats stay home and a wave election results. Lobbying prospects would be reduced in tandem with the loss of Democratic officeholders.
The Clinton forces are already warning the rest of the party that the Obama operation is not to be trusted. Lanny Davis called Obama’s people “vicious”:
You have vicious people who are working for the president – not the president [himself] – who are saying that Corey Booker – one of the great supporters of President Obama’s policies – is ‘dead’ because he’s giving the president good advice, disagreeing with the Kool-Aid drinking people in the campaign who think the way to win the presidency is to trash the other guy rather than to defend your own guy’s record.
[W]hy would they want to create enemies, or depict people as enemies, who are their friends?
Bill Clinton, for all his bonhomie in public, is a bitter man — first for his impeachment, and second for the humiliation he and his partner were dealt by the Obama forces in 2008. A man prone to purple rages in private, following his heart surgery, he may be taking his revenge slowly, a moderate blood pressure, as it were, smiling when walking back the latest diss.
Until Obama came along, Bill was hopeful that the novelty and wonder of history’s first husband-and-wife team of presidents would overwhelm the shame of his impeachment and lying under oath. Obama spoiled that, and made Clinton’s sobriquet “first black president” faintly ridiculous.
Whichever way the current campaign goes, with Obama defeated and the party in ruins, or with Obama off the ticket and Hillary triumphantly accepting the nomination for the good of the party and the nation, or so we will be told, Bill Clinton would prefer it to a second Obama term. And this time, he may get his way.
Read the rest - The Clinton’s war on Obama