► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Israel’

Pelosi: Republican Jews “Being Exploited” by GOP, and they’re “Smart People”; Claims Obama Has Visited Israel “Many Times”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Israel, Politics, Progressives at July 29th, 2012 - 7:02 pm

Nothing this blithering libtard imbecile from San Fransicko says surprises me anymore. I’ve come to expect it, like the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.

We all know that the America-hating Marxist occupying the White House has yet to visit Israel since becoming president. He detests Israel. Muzz swine good, Jews bad.

Every time the dolt opens her rather poorly surgically enhanced piehole, the utter ignorance oozes out for all of us to read.

The interview was conducted by Bloomberg’s Al Hunt, another brain-dead libtard (who’s married to yet another Libtard dolt, Judy Woodruff), so it was one imbecile interviewing another imbecile. The amount of utter stupidity and ignorance in the room during this “interview” must have been off the charts.

Pelosi: Republican Jews ‘Being Exploited’
“And they’re smart people.”

By DANIEL HALPER

In an interview, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi said that she believes Republican Jews are “being exploited,” but she was sure to add, “And they’re smart people.”

Pelosi made the comments in response to whether Jewish voters would support President Barack Obama in the presidential election later this year.

“I think [Obama] will” win the Jewish vote, Pelosi said, when pressed on the subject. “I think that he will, because the fact is when the facts get out. You know, as many of the Republicans are using Israel as an excuse, what they really want are tax cuts for the wealthy. So Israel, that can be one reason they put forth.”

The interviewer then added, “That’s why some of the Republican Jewish supporters are really active.”

Pelosi responded, “Well, that’s how they’re being exploited. And they’re smart people. They follow these issues. But they have to know the facts. And the fact is that President Obama has been the strongest person in terms of sanctions on Iran, which is important to Israel. He’s been the strongest person on whether it’s Iron Dome, David’s Sling, any of these weapons systems and initiatives that relate to Israel. He has been there over and over again.”

Pelosi: President Obama’s Been to Israel ‘Over and Over Again’

By WILLIAM KRISTOL

Daniel Halper has called attention to Nancy Pelosi’s remarkable interview with Al Hunt on the topic of Barack Obama and Israel. I’d note one comment in particular: Pelosi’s claim that President Obama “has been there [Israel] over and over again.”

Wow. I’m involved with the Emergency Committee for Israel. We have an ad up in several states calling attention to the fact that President Obama, who’s been quite the world traveler, has never visited Israel as president. Did we make a terrible mistake? Were we unjust to President Obama? Do we have to pull down the ad?

No, no, and no. Contrary to Pelosi’s apparent claim, President Obama hasn’t been to Israel over and over again. He’s never been as president, which is certainly what Pelosi implied. Well, maybe he visited Israel “over and over” before becoming president, and that’s what Pelosi meant to say? No. When he was senator, Obama went on two trips to Israel, once with several other freshmen members of Congress, and then as a presidential candidate. And he’d never been interested enough in Israel to visit as a private citizen. So much for the notion that Obama’s been “over and over again.”

So Pelosi is wrong, and the Emergency Committee is right. But Pelosi’s resort to a whopper to try to reassure pro-Israel voters does suggest how worried Democrats must be about the reaction to Obama’s attempt to create distance between his administration and Israel, as Obama’s Israel policy gets more scrutiny.

Mitt Romney: I won’t let Iran get nukes

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Breaking News, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Iran, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Military, Mitt Romney, Nuclear Weapons, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party, Sharia (Islamic Law), Terrorism at April 29th, 2012 - 10:30 am

This op-ed was just published in the Wall Street Journal, and it’s more good news for those of us who were unsure about Gov. Romney’s positions on issues important to us and our staunchest ally, Israel.

Maybe Romney should call Bibi and tell him to wait until after the election, like Dear Leader did to Medvedev and Putin, when the traitorous POS promised to give our missile-defense technology to the Russians.

I Won’t Let Iran Get Nukes

Barack Obama is leading us toward a cascade of proliferation in the Middle East.

By MITT ROMNEY

The International Atomic Energy Agency’s latest report this week makes clear what I and others have been warning about for too long: Iran is making rapid headway toward its goal of obtaining nuclear weapons.

Successive American presidents, including Barack Obama, have declared such an outcome to be unacceptable. But under the Obama administration, rhetoric and policy have been sharply at odds, and we’re hurtling toward a major crisis involving nuclear weapons in one of the most politically volatile and economically significant regions of the world.

Things did not have to be this way. To understand how best to proceed from here, we need to review the administration’s extraordinary record of failure.

As a candidate for the presidency in 2007, Barack Obama put forward “engagement” with Tehran as a way to solve the nuclear problem, declaring he would meet with Iran’s leaders “without preconditions.” Whether this approach was rooted in naïveté or in realistic expectations can be debated; I believe it was the former. But whatever calculation lay behind the proposed diplomatic opening, it was predictably rebuffed by the Iranian regime.

After that repudiation, a serious U.S. strategy to block Iran’s nuclear ambitions became an urgent necessity. But that is precisely what the administration never provided. Instead, we’ve been offered a case study in botched diplomacy and its potentially horrific costs.

In his “reset” of relations with Russia, President Obama caved in to Moscow’s demands by reneging on a missile-defense agreement with Eastern European allies and agreeing to a New Start Treaty to reduce strategic nuclear weapons while getting virtually nothing in return. If there ever was a possibility of gaining the Kremlin’s support for tougher action against Tehran, that unilateral giveaway was the moment. President Obama foreclosed it.

Another key juncture came with the emergence of Iran’s Green Revolution after the stolen election of 2009. Here—more than a year before the eruption of the Arab Spring—was a spontaneous popular revolt against a regime that has been destabilizing the region, supporting terrorism around the world, killing American soldiers in Iraq, and attacking the U.S. for three decades. Yet President Obama, evidently fearful of jeopardizing any further hope of engagement, proclaimed his intention not to “meddle” as the ayatollahs unleashed a wave of terror against their own society. A proper American policy might or might not have altered the outcome; we will never know. But thanks to this shameful abdication of moral authority, any hope of toppling a vicious regime was lost, perhaps for generations.

In 2010, the administration did finally impose another round of sanctions, which President Obama hailed as a strike “at the heart” of Iran’s ability to fund its nuclear programs. But here again we can see a gulf between words and deeds. As the IAEA report makes plain, the heart that we supposedly struck is still pumping just fine. Sanctions clearly failed in their purpose. Iran is on the threshold of becoming a nuclear power.

Recent events have brought White House fecklessness to another low. When Iran was discovered plotting to kill Saudi Arabia’s ambassador by setting off a bomb in downtown Washington, the administration responded with nothing more than tough talk and an indictment against two low-level Iranian operatives, as if this were merely a common criminal offense rather than an act of international aggression. Demonstrating further irresolution, the administration then floated the idea of sanctioning Iran’s central bank, only to quietly withdraw that proposal.

Barack Obama has shredded his own credibility on Iran, conveyed an image of American weakness, and increased the prospect of a cascade of nuclear proliferation in the unstable Middle East.

The United States needs a very different policy.

Si vis pacem, para bellum. That is a Latin phrase, but the ayatollahs will have no trouble understanding its meaning from a Romney administration: If you want peace, prepare for war.

I want peace. And if I am president, I will begin by imposing a new round of far tougher economic sanctions on Iran. I will do this together with the world if we can, unilaterally if we must. I will speak out forcefully on behalf of Iranian dissidents. I will back up American diplomacy with a very real and very credible military option. I will restore the regular presence of aircraft carrier groups in the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf region simultaneously. I will increase military assistance to Israel and coordination with all of our allies in the region. These actions will send an unequivocal signal to Iran that the United States, acting in concert with allies, will never permit Iran to obtain nuclear weapons.

Only when the ayatollahs no longer have doubts about America’s resolve will they abandon their nuclear ambitions.

Mr. Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, is seeking the Republican presidential nomination.

A new NASCAR team: America-Israel Racing

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under History, Israel, Sports at March 22nd, 2012 - 5:00 pm

Now this is too cool. A new NASCAR racing team sponsored by Americans who support Israel. Check out the pics at the bottom of the story.

United with Israel at NASCAR!

United with Israel has teamed up with a NASCAR race team whose mission is to spread a message of American support for Israel. Although the “race track” is not a typical venue for pro-Israel advocacy, it will likely become a very effective way to spread positive messages about Israel.

America Israel Racing (AIR) was formed to raise awareness of the importance of America supporting Israel through a unique and very public forum – the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series.

United with Israel is proud to be a sponsor of this incredible effort to promote grassroots support for Israel through America’s most popular spectator sport. “NASCAR provides an entirely new forum to reach and teach millions of people about the importance of standing with Israel,” says Michael Gerbitz of United with Israel.

The America Israel Racing No. 49 Toyota is driven by JJ Yeley, who finished 26 in last Sunday’s Subway Fresh Fit 500 in Phoenix. Yeley currently sits 38th in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Standings.

“This is a critical time in our nation’s history as it pertains to our relationship with Israel,” said Rich Shirey, co-founder of AIR. “As the only true democracy in the Middle East, we feel it is critical that the United States reaffirms its commitment to stand beside Israel.”

AIR partnered with NASCAR veteran Jay Robinson of Robinson-Blakeney Racing for the first three races of 2012 and hopes to continue the relationship throughout the entire NASCAR Sprint Cup season with the support of like-minded individuals AIR will spread its message of American Israeli support by placing a car in the NASCAR Sprint Cup field for the entire 2012 season. Anyone wishing to support America Israel Racing and its cause can make a donation online at AmericaIsraelRacing.com.

“If enough people make a stand, the world will take notice,” said Shirey.

About America Israel Racing

America Israel Racing was formed to raise awareness of the importance of America supporting Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East, as it stands against its enemies. The North Carolina-based race team, founded in 2011, is in the process of fundraising to field a car in the 2012 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series starting with the Daytona 500. Through strategic partnerships and joint ventures with other organizations, America Israel Racing hopes to spread the message throughout the world that the United States supports Israel.

You can visit the America Israel Racing website by clicking here.




Netanyahu to deliver ultimatum to Obama: If the USA does not attack Iran, we will do it alone

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 94 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Elections 2012, History, Holocaust, Iran, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Judaism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Military, Nuclear Weapons, Politics, Progressives, Terrorism at March 5th, 2012 - 11:30 am

Bibi meets with Obungler today (Monday) to discuss Iran. Think Obama will agree to order an attack on Iran? Me neither. So I guess Israel will be on her own. And God will be on Israel’s side. I just hope the Israelis are smart enough NOT to tell anyone in the Obungler administration when and where, because it wouldn’t surprise me if they warned Iran. After all, Obama did say that he’d stand with the moo-slimes.

‘Netanyahu to Tell Obama: Attack Iran – Or Else’

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will deliver President Barack Obama an ultimatum that if the United States does not attack Iran soon, Israel will, the London Telegraph reported Sunday.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said last month that there is a “strong likelihood” of an Israel attack by June. If Prime Minister Netanyahu delivers an ultimatum, it would give the United States 2-3 months to act or face the reality of an Israeli attack that would almost certainly require the United States coming to its aid, if necessary.

Israeli officials have said that in several months, Iran will have buried so many of its nuclear facilities deep under concrete bunkers in mountains that an attack would not be effective.

The Israeli Prime Minister “has the upper hand,” claims the Telegraph’s correspondent Adrian Blomfield.

“Exuding confidence, Mr. Netanyahu effectively brings with him an ultimatum, demanding that unless the president makes a firm pledge to use U.S. military force to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb, Israel may well take matters into its own hands within months,” wrote Blomfield.

He quoted analysts and sources as saying that the year-long Arab Spring rebellion in Syria, on which Iran is dependent to maintain the “axis of evil” with Lebanon, Hizbullah and Hamas, has weakened Iran as well as Damascus.

One other factor he did not mention is that President Obama is running for re-election. Failure to back Israel, if necessary, could torpedo his campaign. Moreover, Republican presidential candidates Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney will address the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention this week. President Obama, Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres also will speak.

The president and the Prime Minister are likely to show a unified stance in public, when they meet this week, but Prime Minister Netanyahu will tell President Barack Obama in private discussions that Israel cannot wait much longer for a military strike to stop or at least delay Iran’s unsupervised nuclear program.

President Obama ruined his already dimming pro-Israel image last year, directly admonishing Prime Minister Netanyahu for continuing to build homes in what the president called “illegitimate” settlements. In return, the Prime Minister gave President Obama a lecture on the facts of life in the Arab-Israeli struggle.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak recently has said that if the Netanyahu government attacks Iran, Israel can defend itself against an Iranian counter-attack.

“It won’t be easy,” a former senior Defense Ministry official told the London newspaper. “Rockets will be fired at cities, including Tel Aviv, but at the same time the doomsday scenario that some have talked of is unlikely to happen. I don’t think we will have all-out war.”

***UPDATE***

Obama- Give diplomacy more time!

Just what the Iranians were hoping to hear (and expected)…

Obama offers Netanyahu assurances over Iran

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama, aiming to head off any premature Israeli strike on Iran, sought to assure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday that the United States would always “have Israel’s back” but said there was still time for diplomacy.

Netanyahu, in a show of unity with an American leader with whom he has had a rocky relationship, said at the White House that both Israel and the United States stood together on the need to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

“The bond between our two countries is unbreakable,” Obama said. “The United States will always have Israel’s back when it comes to Israel’s security.”

The two men, sitting side by side and smiling at each other in the Oval Office, sought to present a united front in the Iranian nuclear standoff after weeks of mounting concern that Israel would preemptively strike Iran on its own.

In one of the most consequential meetings of U.S. and Israeli leaders in years, they made no mention of any differences they may have over red lines that could trigger military action to curb an Iranian nuclear program that Israel sees as a threat to its existence.

“We believe there is still a window that allows for a diplomatic resolution,” Obama said.

Netanyahu made clear that Israel would be the “master of its fate” in deciding how to deal with Iran, which has called for the destruction of the Jewish state.

“It must have the ability to defend itself, by itself, against any threat,” Netanyahu said, echoing remarks Obama made a day earlier in a speech to the powerful pro-Israel lobby AIPAC.

Obama has been urging Israel to allow sanctions more time to work against Iran’s nuclear ambitions while balancing that with assurances of his resolve to do whatever is necessary to keep the Islamic republic from becoming a nuclear-armed state.

At the White House meeting, Obama told Netanyahu the United States reserved “all options” in dealing with Iran. The president has made clear that would include a possible military component.

“We do not want to see a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region in the world,” Obama said.

Iran denies it is seeking nuclear weapons.

Douglas Murray at his best – Israel & Nuclear Iran

by 1389AD ( 36 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, History, Iran, Israel, Jihad, Middle East, Nuclear Weapons, Special Report, UK at February 7th, 2012 - 10:20 am

From YouTube:

Uploaded by lector0003 on Jan 26, 2012
Probably Douglas Murray’s finest speech delineating the inane moral fetor emanating from Western academicians on the Iranian nuclear crisis (and the hapless Jewish state Europe hates).

More from Douglas Murray here.


Dubai Sheikh: If Iran Attacks, Israel Will Wipe It Off the Map

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Headlines, History, IDF, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Nuclear Weapons, Sharia (Islamic Law), Weapons at December 6th, 2011 - 11:53 am

If I was in charge of Israel, I’d do it pre-emptively and not wait to be attacked, but that’s just the war-monger in me.

Dubai Sheikh: If Iran Attacks, Israel Will Wipe It Off the Map

by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has threatened to wipe Israel off the map but will discover his own cities may disappear if he attacks Israel, the United Arab Emirate’s prime minister told CNN.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who also serves as vice president of the Emirates, also said he doubts that Iran would use a nuclear bomb or even build one.

“What can Iran do with a nuclear weapon?” he asked rhetorically. “For example, will they hit Israel? How many Palestinians will die? And you think if Iran hits Israel, their cities will be safe? They will be gone the next day.”

The UAE, like Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, are dead-set against Shi’ite Muslim Iran’s bold desire to head an Islamic empire, based on Sharia law, in every Muslim country.

The UAE probably would provide key bases and air space in the event of a Western or Israeli attack on Iran. It also is a prime target for Iran, which is separated from the UAE by only 50 miles via the Persian Gulf. Furthermore, several Gulf State islands are claimed by Iran.

However, al Maktoum spoke in diplomatic language with CNN. “Iran is our neighbor,” he said. “They are Muslim, and we lived next to each other for thousands and thousands of years. I don’t believe that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon.”

Herman Cain, Superstar (to me), talks about Afghanistan, Israel, Iran, etc….

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 33 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Conservatism, Elections 2012, History, Military, Politics, Progressives, Tea Parties, The Political Right, Weapons at September 27th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Check out this video interview. Herman’s answers are outstanding, especially about Israel and how to deal with Iran.

Insiders and political pros never recognize a superstar when they see one. Herman Cain is just such a star. Now that Rick Perry has been unmasked as a weak debater and an even weaker opponent of illegal immigration, conservatives are turning their lonely eyes to Cain. A stellar debate performance on Fox News led to a smashing victory in the Presidential straw poll in Florida and a strong third place finish — behind Romney and Perry — in the Michigan straw poll. Both Michigan and Florida are likely among the seven states that will hold primaries or caucuses in February (and they are the two biggest of the seven).

Here is a man who offers an alternative to Obama’s class warfare. His life story shows that Obama’s route to the top — through affirmative action, community organizing, and a climb up the political ladder — is not the only one available to minorities. His combination of hard work in the private sector, entrepreneurial initiative, and managerial skill can also get you there. He embraces the successful as role models not as objects of envy. He does not hate rich people. He wants us all to become rich.

In a sense, Cain’s rise and Mitt Romney’s are parallel trajectories. Each has based his appeal on the idea that life in the private sector is better than a career in government service to equip one to solve America’s economic problems. Both say that their hands on experience at job creation qualify them to be president in a way that Perry’s lifelong political immersion does not.

Now, as Perry fades and Romney rises, Herman Cain is on the cusp of front tier status in the Republican nominating contest.

Cain has a grip on the Tea Party grassroots. No matter how diligently the establishment tries to ignore him, he keeps popping up, impelled by his charisma, oratory, issue positions, and broad based appeal.

Daniel Greenfield: The End of Palestine

by Eliana ( 137 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2012, Fatah, Hamas, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Israel, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians, Republican Party, Terrorism, United Nations at September 19th, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Daniel Greenfield has a wonderful article about the current situation with Mahmoud Abbas and the UN on his Sultan Knish blog.

It’s a long article that recounts the history of the Arab-Israel conflict since 1964 with sparkling clarity. It should be a permanent reference on this blog.

The section that describes where we are right now with this situation is insightful, breathtaking and well worth reading:

It might be 2011, but it might as well be 1996 or 2003 or any year in between. Except that the PLO’s power is about done. The negotiations don’t matter. Abbas will do his best to see that they fail, because it’s the only way he can survive his own people. And he needs to have the blame for the failure fall on Israel, because it’s the only way he can hang on to US and European support. As usual, nothing Israel can do will work, and whatever it does, it will get the blame. The media will go on chattering about settlements, as if that were the endgame here.

Statehood is a fiction that will move more money into the pockets of the Fatah elite, but it’s also a double-edged sword. Fatah’s only defense against a Hamas takeover is that it can extract territory through negotiations– something Hamas cannot do because it refuses to negotiate for anything but temporary truces. A unilateral statehood declaration, if taken seriously, would also mean the end of negotiations. That’s something Abbas can’t afford because then his usefulness to Hamas is at an end.

Abbas needs Israel to keep from being overrun by Hamas, but he needs Hamas to keep his image as the moderate alternative to those crazy guys in Gaza. The balancing act has drawn billions in foreign aid, but infuriated everyone. Now Abbas is playing an even more dangerous game, going for broke to shake down Israel and the world into giving him some breathing room. It’s a desperate move, but it may also work in the short term. In the long term though, the whole shebang is still doomed.

The Palestinian Authority is not a government, it’s a terrorist organization in suits and ties. It has shown that it is not self-supporting and not capable of running anything besides a rocket launcher. It existed only as long as it was useful to someone.

The PLO began life because it was useful to the Syrians and Egyptians. When they no longer wanted it, it was still useful to the USSR. When the USSR no longer wanted it, it became useful to America. But now it’s running out of sponsors.

The United States has been funding the Palestinian Authority since 1992 and it has gotten nothing for it, and while the foreign policy establishment insists on blaming Israel for that, there’s only so long that game can go as well. The Bush Administration dumped Arafat and Abbas knows that sooner or later his turn will come. With no more options, no ability to reach a final status agreement and Western patrons whose foreign aid budgets will start tightening in the face of the bankruptcy, he is playing his only remaining card.

Either way the Palestinian myth is on the verge of flickering out. Hamas may talk about Palestinian rights, but it has even less interest in them than the PLO did. Hamas was spawned by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Its goal is an Islamic state in Egypt and Gaza, and then all of Israel. It has replaced the Pan-Arabism of a Shukairy with a Pan-Islamism, that it meant to lead to a Global Caliphate. The leaders of Hamas are no less corrupt than Arafat’s cronies were, but it will take longer for the average Israeli Arab to figure that out.

The Arab and Muslim world has made very effective use of Israeli Arabs [Arabs within the land of Israel as a whole. - Eli.] as terrorists and bullies. From the Lebanese Civil War, to the streets of Iran, where Palestinian Arab terrorists are being used as snipers and gunmen to suppress protests against Ahmadinejad, they have always been weapons. Ideology has served to frame a mythical Palestinian identity for them in terms that make them all into mercenaries, terrorists and martyrs. Where Israel took in Jewish refugees, the Arab world deliberately perpetuated an Arab refugee problem in order to turn them into weapons. Once they were the weapons of Arab Socialism. Now they are the weapons of Islam.

The End of Palestine

I believe he’s right about this. Mahmoud Abbas had hoped that Obama would deliver Israel to him and he said as much in an interview with Jackson Diehl in May 2009.

Yet on Wednesday afternoon, as he prepared for the White House meeting in a suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Pentagon City, Abbas insisted that his only role was to wait. He will wait for Hamas to capitulate to his demand that any Palestinian unity government recognize Israel and swear off violence. And he will wait for the Obama administration to force a recalcitrant Netanyahu to freeze Israeli settlement construction and publicly accept the two-state formula.

Until Israel meets his demands, the Palestinian president says, he will refuse to begin negotiations. He won’t even agree to help Obama’s envoy, George J. Mitchell, persuade Arab states to take small confidence-building measures. “We can’t talk to the Arabs until Israel agrees to freeze settlements and recognize the two-state solution,” he insisted in an interview. “Until then we can’t talk to anyone.”

At that time (May 2009), Mahmoud Abbas fully expected Obama to run Netanyahu out of office:

Abbas and his team fully expect that Netanyahu will never agree to the full settlement freeze — if he did, his center-right coalition would almost certainly collapse. So they plan to sit back and watch while U.S. pressure slowly squeezes the Israeli prime minister from office. “It will take a couple of years,” one official breezily predicted. Abbas rejects the notion that he should make any comparable concession — such as recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, which would imply renunciation of any large-scale resettlement of refugees.

Instead, he says, he will remain passive. “I will wait for Hamas to accept international commitments. I will wait for Israel to freeze settlements,” he said. “Until then, in the West Bank we have a good reality . . . the people are living a normal life.” In the Obama administration, so far, it’s easy being Palestinian.

Abbas’s Waiting Game on Peace With Israel

Obama backed the wrong side in this fight and he’s going through the humiliation of being told by the Arab world that he wished to court so badly that he will be finished in Saudi Arabia and other places if he gives his veto to “Palestinian” statehood.

If Obama doesn’t give his veto (which will be necessary unless he can talk nine members of the Security Council to help him out in defeating the UN bid so that the veto won’t be necessary) – Obama will be excluded from the Middle East peace process that he campaigned in 2008 that he would address seriously on day one of his presidency.

If Obama is kicked out of the peace process by Abbas in favor of the international community and the ICC, he will be humiliated in an election year while he is facing even worse problems domestically.

Obama created this mess and I think/hope that this truly is the “End of Palestine” and the end of Obama’s presidency by January 2013.

Something else is that Abbas may be listening to Republican presidential candidates who don’t even pretend to think that the “Palestinians” have a valid cause. The candidates say the opposite, in fact.

Abbas may be worrying that Obama won’t win next year and “Palestine” will end that way. So this is his last shot for a number of reasons.

Let’s hope so.

Israel Defense chief warns Muzz Terrorists: “Don’t Test Our Strength”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Crime, Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Headlines, Hezballah, IDF, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Judaism, Military, Nuclear Weapons, Palestinians, Taliban, Terrorism at September 6th, 2011 - 7:20 am

Israeli Defense Forces Chief General Benny Gantz warned terrorist groups on Tuesday against attacking Israel.

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz warns terrorists against attacking Israel. “If Hamas or anyone else attacks us we’ll hit them hard.”
by Elad Benari

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz warned terrorist groups on Tuesday against attacking Israel.

Speaking at a special event marking the 35th anniversary of the IDF’s Shaldag Unit, of which he himself was a commander between 1989 and 1991, Gantz said, “Hamas and the other terrorist organizations in Gaza should know that if they harm Israeli citizens we will hit them hard and it would be a mistake on their part to test our strength.”

Gantz also praised the work of the Shaldag Unit in the fight against terror, saying, “When we look at the threats surrounding us, we need operational capabilities, courage and good people, and the Shaldag Unit has been one of our very significant pillars over the years.”

The Shaldag Unit was established in 1976 under the command of Muki Betzer. Shaldag’s mission is to deploy undetected into combat zones and hostile environments in order to conduct special reconnaissance, establish assault zones or airfields, while simultaneously conducting air traffic control and commando actions. Click here to read the rest.

The UN in September 2011

by Eliana ( 63 Comments › )
Filed under Fatah, Hamas, Israel, Open thread, Palestinians at August 31st, 2011 - 11:30 am



Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!

Great prize! Great cause!



What will the “Palestinians” do?

They’ve gone back and forth a million times among all the players on their side (“Yes, we will declare statehood”, “No, we won’t”, “We haven’t decided”, “Yes, we have”, “No, we haven’t”, “We want to negotiate with Israel”, “No, we don’t”, “Yes, we do”, “Israel is the one who’s really refusing to speak to us”, etc.)

Recently, a legal expert told the “Palestinian Authority” that they would be sacrificing the so-called “right of return” (i.e., flooding Israel with millions of Arabs) if they declare statehood. Hanan Ashrawi came forward and said that this isn’t true.

Today, Jordan is also telling the “Palestinian Authority” not to declare statehood because the so-called “right of return” (flooding the state with millions of Arabs) would be ruined. Jordan has some of these refugees themselves and they don’t want to be stuck with them. The rest of the countries that have “Palestinian” refugees don’t want to be stuck with theirs either.

While all this is going on, of course, Israel is under attack in the (“Palestinian”) hope that they will lose enough people to make a bigger stink at the UN (but not enough of a stink to ruin the so-called “right of return” because they want to flood into Israel in the millions no matter how woefully they cry that Israel is mean to them).

What the “Palestinians” want most of all is the “one state solution” because they believe that they would be moving into the Knesset and forcing Benjamin Netanyahu to scoot over in the Prime Minister chair.

So one of the real possibilities in all this is that they will dissolve the “Palestinian Authority” and hand the keys to Israel. In this way, they would force Israel to take care of millions of Arabs in Judea and Samaria. They believe they would get the “one state solution” that they’ve wanted all along (the one that would become an Arab state as soon as humanly possible).

There’s a new document out from the “Palestinians” that ponders some of these questions and Carl in Jerusalem is pondering their pondering (as many of us are doing now as we look at these strange people who believe that declaring a state means sending ones population into the state next door).

Please take a look at Carl’s post to his take on all this:

‘Palestinians’ threaten ‘one-state solution’

Hat Tip: Carl in Jerusalem




Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!

Great prize! Great cause!